Detailed Analysis of the Property Factor in Nebraska Research and Development Tax Credit Apportionment

The property factor is a ratio comparing the value of a business’s real and tangible assets in Nebraska to its total assets everywhere, used to calculate the state’s share of federal R&D tax credits. Under Method I apportionment, this factor is averaged with the payroll factor to determine the portion of research activity attributable to Nebraska’s economic environment. 1

This fundamental metric ensures that tax incentives are distributed proportionately to a business firm’s physical footprint within the state, bridging the gap between national research expenditures and localized economic impact. For multistate corporations, the property factor serves as a stabilizer against the volatility of sales or temporary payroll shifts, anchoring the tax benefit to the long-term capital investments—such as laboratories, specialized machinery, and testing facilities—that define the modern research and development landscape. 3 While Nebraska has generally moved toward a single-factor sales apportionment for corporate income tax to encourage exports and local hiring, the Nebraska Advantage Research and Development Act retains the property factor as a critical diagnostic tool for measuring the geographic source of innovation. 2 Understanding the nuances of this factor is essential for tax directors and controllers seeking to optimize their state tax positions while ensuring strict compliance with Nebraska Department of Revenue (DOR) mandates.

The Legislative Foundation: Nebraska Advantage Research and Development Act

The Nebraska Advantage Research and Development Act, established primarily for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2006, serves as the primary statutory vehicle for innovation-based tax relief. 6 The Act, codified under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 77-5803, explicitly links state incentives to the definitions provided in the Internal Revenue Code (IRC). 3 Specifically, the credit is available to business firms making expenditures in research and experimental activities as defined under IRC § 174. 8

The statute allows a credit equal to 15% of the federal credit allowed under IRC § 41, or 35% if the research is conducted on a university campus. 3 However, for a business firm doing business both within and without Nebraska, the credit must be “apportioned to this state.” 3 This is where the property factor enters the legal framework. The law provides two distinct methodologies for this apportionment, giving taxpayers the flexibility to choose the method that yields the highest credit—a notable “taxpayer-friendly” feature of Nebraska’s incentive regime. 1

Statutory Context of Apportionment

The mechanics of the property factor are not found in the R&D Act alone but are imported from the broader Nebraska Revenue Act of 1967. Neb. Rev. Stat. § 77-2734.12 defines the property factor for corporate income tax purposes, and these same rules are applied to the R&D credit through cross-referencing in administrative regulations and instructions for Form 3800N Worksheet RD. 8 This legal synthesis means that the definitions of “real and tangible personal property,” the rules for “original cost,” and the “eight times rent” multiplier apply uniformly across the state’s tax landscape. 1

The Mechanics of the Property Factor Calculation

To calculate the property factor, a business must determine the average value of its property in Nebraska (the numerator) and its total property everywhere (the denominator). This seemingly simple fraction is governed by complex valuation rules that distinguish between owned and rented assets. 1

Valuation of Owned Property: The Original Cost Basis

Nebraska deviates from some states that use net book value (cost minus depreciation) by requiring that all owned property be valued at its original cost. 1 This original cost is generally defined as the basis of the property for federal income tax purposes at the time of acquisition, before any adjustments for depreciation or amortization. 4

The rationale behind using original cost is to maintain a consistent benchmark. If a company operates an R&D facility in Nebraska that is 20 years old and fully depreciated, and a new facility in Iowa that is only 2 years old, using net book value would unfairly skew the property factor toward Iowa, despite the Nebraska facility potentially housing more significant research activity. By using original cost, the factor reflects the historical capital commitment to the state. 2

Leasehold Improvements as Owned Property

A specific nuance in Nebraska Regulation 24-362 is the treatment of leasehold improvements. Regardless of whether the improvements revert to the landlord upon the expiration of a lease, they are treated as property owned by the taxpayer for apportionment purposes. 4 The original cost of these improvements must be included in the property factor, adding another layer of “owned” assets to what might otherwise be a rented facility. 4

Valuation of Rented Property: The Eight-Times Multiplier

For property that is rented rather than owned, Nebraska uses a standard industry formula to convert annual rent into a “capitalized” value. The value of rented property is determined by multiplying the net annual rental rate by eight (8). 1 The “net annual rental rate” is the total annual rent paid by the taxpayer, less any annual rental income received from sub-rentals. 1

This multiplier is intended to create a rough parity between the value of owned real estate and the value of leased space. For a research firm that leases laboratory equipment or office space, this calculation significantly impacts the property factor. It is important to note that “rent” includes not only the base lease payments but also any additional payments that are considered “in lieu of rent,” such as property taxes or insurance premiums paid by the lessee under a triple-net lease arrangement. 4

The Averaging Method

The value used in the property factor is the “average value” for the tax period. 1 This is calculated by taking the value of the property at the beginning of the tax year, adding the value at the end of the tax year, and dividing the sum by two. 1

However, the Nebraska Tax Commissioner maintains the authority to require or permit the averaging of monthly values if a simple beginning-and-end average does not fairly represent the taxpayer’s property distribution. 1 This might occur if a company opens a massive new research center in November; a simple average would include half of that facility’s value for the whole year, potentially overstating the activity. Monthly averaging would more accurately reflect that the facility was only available for two months of the tax period. 1

Inclusions and Exclusions: What Counts as “Used” Property?

The Nebraska Administrative Code provides a rigorous definition of property that is “used” and therefore includable in the apportionment factor. 316 Neb. Admin. Code, ch. 24, § 362 states that the factor includes all real and tangible personal property owned or rented and used during the tax period. 4

Qualifying Assets

1. Tangible Personal Property: This includes machinery, equipment, laboratory apparatus, specialized research computers, and furniture. 4
2. Inventory and Stocks of Goods: Raw materials used in the research process, such as chemicals or prototype components, are generally included if they are held for use in the business. 4
3. Stand-by and Reserve Facilities: Property held as a reserve source of materials or as a stand-by facility (such as a backup generator or a temporarily idle pilot plant) must be included in the factor. 4
4. Property Available for Use: If an asset is capable of being used but is currently idle due to a lack of projects, it remains in the property factor. It only exits the factor upon “permanent withdrawal,” which is typically defined as an identifiable event like a sale or a lapse of five years without use. 4

Excluded Assets

1. Intangibles: Items such as patents, copyrights, trademarks, coins, and currency are explicitly excluded. 4 While patents are often the primary output of R&D, they are not “tangible personal property” and thus do not affect the property factor.
2. Property Producing Non-Business Income: If property is used to produce income that is not subject to apportionment (non-business income), it is excluded. 4
3. Construction in Progress (CIP): Property or equipment under construction is generally excluded until it is actually placed in service and “used.” 4 The only exception is goods in process that will become inventory. 4 If a facility is partially used while still under construction, the value must be included to the extent of that use. 4

The Strategic Importance of Method I vs. Method II

The Nebraska R&D credit offers a unique flexibility: taxpayers can choose between two apportionment methods. Method I relies heavily on the property factor, while Method II focuses on actual expenditures. 1

Method I: The Property and Payroll Blend

Method I determines the Nebraska portion of the federal credit by averaging the property factor and the payroll factor. 1 The resulting percentage is multiplied by the total federal credit. This method is often beneficial for companies that have significant capital investment in Nebraska but conduct a portion of their highly-paid research labor in other states. 11

Formula for Method I:

$$\text{Average Factor} = \frac{\text{Nebraska Property Factor} + \text{Nebraska Payroll Factor}}{2}$$

$$\text{State Credit} = (\text{Total Federal Credit} \times \text{Average Factor}) \times 15\% \text{ (or 35\%)}$$

Method II: The Actual Expenditure Ratio

Method II determines the Nebraska portion based on the ratio of actual Qualified Research Expenditures (QREs) in Nebraska to total QREs everywhere. 1 This method is often preferred by software companies or service-based research firms that have minimal physical property but high-density payroll located within the state. 15

Formula for Method II:

$$\text{Expenditure Ratio} = \frac{\text{Qualified Research Expenditures in Nebraska}}{\text{Total Qualified Research Expenditures Everywhere}}$$

$$\text{State Credit} = (\text{Total Federal Credit} \times \text{Expenditure Ratio}) \times 15\% \text{ (or 35\%)}$$

Annual Optimization

The Nebraska DOR allows taxpayers to calculate both methods and enter the larger resulting credit on Form 3800N. 1 Furthermore, businesses are not locked into a single method for the life of the credit. A company might use Method I in Year 1 while building out a new lab (leveraging high property values) and switch to Method II in Year 3 as its research staff expands (leveraging high expenditure ratios). 1 This dynamic choice makes the accurate calculation of the property factor an annual strategic necessity.

Enhanced Credits and the “On-Campus” Property Factor

A hallmark of the Nebraska Advantage Research and Development Act is the university collaboration bonus. While the standard credit is 15%, research conducted “on the campus of a college or university in this state or at a facility owned by a college or university in this state” qualifies for an enhanced credit of 35%. 3

Defining the Campus Property Factor

Revenue Ruling 29-10-2 clarifies that the enhanced and regular credits are separate calculations. 10 For a firm operating both in its own private lab and in a university-owned incubator, the property factor must be bifurcated on Form 3800N Worksheet RD. 10

1. Line 3a (Off-Campus Property): The numerator includes property at the firm’s private Nebraska locations. 1
2. Line 3b (On-Campus Property): The numerator includes property (owned or rented by the taxpayer) that is physically located at the university campus or facility. 1

This bifurcation is critical because the 35% rate applies only to the portion of the federal credit apportioned to the on-campus activity. 3 If a company uses its own high-value spectrometry equipment inside a university lab, that equipment’s original cost must be reported on Line 3b to ensure it contributes to the enhanced credit calculation rather than the lower 15% rate. 1

Revenue Ruling 29-10-2: The Importance of Location

The Department of Revenue has explicitly stated that the phrase “in this state” refers to the location of the research activity, not the headquarters of the university. 10 For example, if a firm conducts research at a facility in Omaha owned by the University of Nebraska, it qualifies for the 35% rate. 10 The property factor must reflect the specific tangible assets used at that Nebraska location. 10

Corporate Structures and Apportionment Nuances

The application of the property factor varies depending on the legal structure of the business firm. Nebraska provides specific guidance for partnerships, S-corporations, and unitary groups. 8

Pass-Through Entities (PTEs)

For partnerships, LLCs, and S-corporations, the R&D credit is typically calculated at the entity level but used at the owner level. 7 The entity must still complete Form 3800N Worksheet RD to determine the total credit amount. Once the credit is calculated (using either Method I or Method II), it is distributed to the partners or shareholders in the same proportion as income. 8

While the credit is refundable at the entity level (allowing the partnership to receive a check for sales tax refunds), it is nonrefundable at the individual owner level. 8 This distinction makes the initial calculation—and the property factor that drives it—paramount for the ultimate tax benefit realized by the owners. 8

Unitary Groups and Common Control

If a taxpayer is a member of a unitary group, special rules apply. The Department of Revenue requires that if a federal research credit was calculated for a group of businesses under common control, the Nebraska property and payroll factors must be calculated specifically for the individual taxpayer claiming the credit. 1

This prevents a large national conglomerate from “diluting” its Nebraska research activity by including the massive property holdings of non-research-heavy affiliates in the denominator. Conversely, it ensures that the Nebraska credit is tied to the specific entity that is creating economic value within the state. 1

Tiered Partnerships

In complex tiered partnership structures, the property factor must include the pro-rata share of the property owned or rented by lower-tier entities. 17 This ensures that if a Nebraska company conducts research through a joint venture or a subsidiary partnership, its “indirect” property holdings in the state are reflected in the numerator of its apportionment factor. 17

Compliance, Documentation, and the E-Verify Mandate

Claiming the R&D tax credit in Nebraska is not purely an accounting exercise; it is also a compliance exercise. The Department of Revenue maintains strict standards for documenting the property factor and other apportionment metrics. 1

Required Documentation for the Property Factor

When filing Form 3800N Worksheet RD, taxpayers must attach a schedule showing the detailed calculations for both the property and payroll factors. 1 For the property factor, this schedule should include:

• A list of all Nebraska property locations.
• The addresses of any college or university campuses used. 1
• The original cost of all owned assets, broken down by category.
• A summary of annual rent payments and the application of the 8x multiplier.
• The beginning and ending values for each asset class to demonstrate accurate averaging. 1

The E-Verify “Cliff”

A unique and non-negotiable requirement for the Nebraska R&D credit is the use of the federal E-Verify system. 6 All business firms claiming the credit must verify the work eligibility of every employee hired in Nebraska during the tax year. 6 While this primarily affects the payroll factor, the DOR has the authority to disqualify the entire credit—including the portion driven by the property factor—if a firm fails to comply with the E-Verify mandate. 9 This makes human resources compliance a prerequisite for tax incentive realization.

Audit Protocols and Record Retention

The Nebraska DOR typically has four years to audit an R&D credit claim. 15 However, if the credit is being carried forward, the records must be kept for at least three years after filing the last return on which the credit carryforward is used. 18 Given that the R&D credit can be carried forward for 20 years, a firm might need to maintain property records (showing the original cost and location of assets) for well over two decades. 6

Economic Statistics and Program Impact

The Nebraska Department of Revenue’s annual reports provide a window into the scale and effectiveness of the R&D credit program. These statistics highlight the sectors where the property factor plays the most significant role. 19

Total Credits and Utilization

Between 2006 and mid-2023, the Nebraska Advantage Research and Development Act has facilitated over $77 million in tax credits. 19 A significant portion of these credits is used to obtain refunds of sales and use taxes, providing immediate liquidity to capital-intensive research firms. 9

Source: 2023 Tax Incentives Annual Report. 19

The Role of University Research

The “enhanced” 35% credit, which requires research property to be located on a university campus, is a major driver of public-private partnerships. The University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL) reported $617 million in total research expenditures in FY 2023. 20 Industry-sponsored research expenditures at UNL reached $32.7 million, representing a significant pool of activity that likely utilizes the on-campus property factor calculation to maximize state tax benefits. 20

Practical Example: Multistate Property Factor Calculation

To further clarify the application of these rules, let us examine a detailed scenario. Consider “Precision Ag-Systems,” a manufacturer of autonomous tractor components with operations in Nebraska and Colorado.

Step 1: Asset Identification and Valuation

Precision Ag-Systems holds the following assets during the 2024 tax year:

Step 2: Calculating Nebraska Values (Numerator)

1. Owned Real Property: The Lincoln facility average is $(\$4,000,000 + \$4,000,000) / 2 = \$4,000,000$.
2. Owned Personal Property: The Nebraska lab equipment average is $(\$800,000 + \$1,200,000) / 2 = \$1,000,000$.
3. Rented Property: The Omaha office value is $(\$50,000 \times 8) = \$400,000$.

Total Nebraska Property (Numerator): $\$4,000,000 + \$1,000,000 + \$400,000 = \$5,400,000$. 1

Step 3: Calculating Total Values (Denominator)

1. Total Owned Real Property: $(\$4,000,000 + \$10,000,000) = \$14,000,000$.
2. Total Owned Personal Property: $(\$1,000,000 \text{ NE Avg} + \$500,000 \text{ CO Avg}) = \$1,500,000$.
3. Total Rented Property: Nebraska $(\$400,000) + \text{Colorado (Assume } \$0) = \$400,000$.

Total Property Everywhere (Denominator): $\$14,000,000 + \$1,500,000 + \$400,000 = \$15,900,000$. 1

Step 4: Final Factor Calculation

$$\text{Nebraska Property Factor} = \frac{\$5,400,000}{\$15,900,000} = 0.3396 \text{ (or 33.96\%)}$$

1

This 33.96% property factor will then be averaged with the firm’s Nebraska payroll factor. If the payroll factor is 40%, the Method I apportionment percentage would be 36.98%. This percentage is applied to the company’s total federal R&D credit to determine the portion eligible for the 15% Nebraska credit. 1

Common Pitfalls in Property Factor Reporting

Through audits and administrative rulings, the Nebraska DOR has identified several recurring errors that taxpayers make when calculating the property factor for the R&D credit.

1. Using Net Book Value

Many corporate tax departments default to their financial statement values, which include accumulated depreciation. 13 As discussed, Nebraska statute strictly requires original cost. 1 Failing to add back depreciation will result in an incorrect factor and potentially a significant underpayment or overpayment of tax, depending on where the oldest assets are located. 4

2. Mischaracterizing Leasehold Improvements

There is often confusion over whether improvements to a leased space should be capitalized using the 8x rent multiplier or treated as owned property at cost. 4 Nebraska guidance is clear: improvements are owned property. 4 This is advantageous for the taxpayer, as the cost of improvements often exceeds the value that would be derived from the 8x rent multiplier.

3. Ignoring Property “Available for Use”

When a facility is temporarily closed for renovation or a project ends, firms sometimes remove the property from the factor. However, unless the property is permanently withdrawn or held for sale for five years, it must remain in both the numerator and denominator. 4

4. Failure to Bifurcate On-Campus Assets

Companies that collaborate with universities often fail to separate the equipment and rented space used on campus from their general Nebraska operations. 10 This leads to all Nebraska research being credited at 15%, missing out on the 35% enhanced credit rate for the on-campus portion. 3

Future Outlook and the Transition to ImagiNE Nebraska

The Nebraska tax incentive landscape is in a period of transition. The Nebraska Advantage Act was the flagship program for over 15 years, but it stopped accepting new applications on December 31, 2020. 21 It has been succeeded by the ImagiNE Nebraska Act. 22

Continuity of the R&D Credit

While the primary “Advantage” application window has closed, the Nebraska Advantage Research and Development Act continues to exist as a separate, stand-alone incentive. 6 Many of the core concepts—including the 15% and 35% rates and the use of the property factor for apportionment—have been maintained to provide stability for the state’s research sector. 6

Legislative Trends

The Nebraska Legislature has recently focused on “foreign adversarial companies,” making them ineligible for state incentives starting in 2025. 24 This adds a new layer of due diligence for companies claiming the R&D credit: they must not only calculate their property and payroll factors accurately but also certify their corporate ownership and control status to remain eligible for benefits. 24

The Sunset Date

The Nebraska R&D credit currently has a sunset date of December 31, 2033. 9 This provides a long runway for businesses to plan capital investments and research projects. However, it also means that the property records used to calculate the credit today could be subject to audit well into the 2040s if carryforwards are utilized. 6

Conclusion: Mastering the Property Factor for Tax Efficiency

The property factor is far more than a simple fraction in a tax return; it is a mathematical representation of a business firm’s commitment to the Nebraska economy. In the context of the R&D tax credit, it serves as a bridge between federal innovation policy and state-level economic development. 3 By anchoring the credit to tangible assets like research facilities and laboratory equipment, Nebraska ensures that its tax expenditures yield real-world physical infrastructure within its borders. 4

For the tax professional, mastering the property factor requires a multi-disciplinary approach. It requires a deep understanding of accounting for original costs, a legal grasp of leasehold improvements and “available for use” status, and a strategic view of when to utilize Method I versus Method II. 1 Furthermore, the “on-campus” enhancement provides a powerful incentive for university collaboration, but only for those who can accurately bifurcate their property factors to prove where the innovation is occurring. 10

As Nebraska continues to compete for high-tech and agricultural-science investments, the R&D tax credit remains a cornerstone of its strategy. The property factor will continue to be the diagnostic tool that ensures these incentives are applied fairly, accurately, and in a manner that rewards the firms that choose to call Nebraska home for their most innovative work. 9 Consistent attention to detail, rigorous documentation of asset locations, and annual optimization between apportionment methods will remain the hallmarks of a successful and compliant Nebraska R&D tax credit claim. 1

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/