Alaska R&D Tax Credit
"The Alaska R&D Credit creates a dollar-for-dollar reduction in state income tax liability, calculated as 18% of the eligible Federal Research Credit generated within the state."
This interactive report analyzes the intersection of Federal IRC Section 41 and Alaska Statute 43.20.021. It provides a comprehensive framework for businesses to understand eligibility, calculate potential savings, and navigate compliance requirements.
Credit Rate
of the Federal Credit amount
Statute
Applicable Law
Legislative Mechanics
Understanding how the Alaska credit "piggybacks" on the Federal statute is crucial for compliance. The state does not create its own definition of research; it adopts the federal definition.
🏛️ Federal Basis (IRC §41)
Section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) defines "Qualified Research Activities" (QRAs) and "Qualified Research Expenses" (QREs). To qualify, activities must pass the "Four-Part Test."
- • Wages: Taxable wages for employees doing research.
- • Supplies: Materials used/consumed in the process.
- • Contract Research: 65% of payments to third parties.
🏔️ Alaska Application (AS 43.20.021)
Alaska Statute 43.20.021(k) specifically adopts the federal definitions but alters the calculation rate.
- 1. Adoption: The credit is allowed against the Alaska Corporate Income Tax.
- 2. Calculation: The credit equals 18% of the *Federal* credit amount determined under IRC §41(a).
- 3. Limitation: The credit cannot exceed the tax liability (non-refundable), but carryforwards are typically allowed (consult local guidance for current carryforward years, historically 7 years).
The Flow of Calculation
Visual representation of how Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) translate to Alaska Credits.
The 4-Part Test Analyzer
To claim the credit in Alaska, the underlying activity must meet all four criteria of the Federal test. Click each card to explore the requirements.
Select a criteria above
Click on one of the four cards above to see detailed requirements and an Alaska-specific example.
Financial Impact Calculator
Estimate your potential Alaska R&D tax credit. This model assumes a simplified "Regular Credit" calculation for demonstration purposes (20% Federal rate on excess QREs).
Input Data
Wages, Supplies, 65% Contractor fees.
Historical avg. spend or fixed base.
Expense vs. Tax Benefit Analysis
State Revenue Office Guidance
Form 6320
To claim the credit, taxpayers must typically file specific schedules detailing the federal calculation and the application of the 18% Alaska rate. Ensure this is attached to the Alaska Corporate Income Tax Return (Form 6000).
Audit Proofing
Alaska Department of Revenue (DOR) often requests the same substantiation as the IRS. Maintain project accounting records, time tracking, and "nexus" proof that the R&D occurred physically within Alaska.
Statute of Limitations
Generally follows the federal timeline (3 years), but can be extended if there are net operating loss (NOL) adjustments.
Conclusion & Strategic Outlook
The Alaska R&D tax credit represents a significant opportunity for companies operating in the state's challenging but resource-rich environment. By effectively adopting IRC §41 standards, the state encourages modernization in fisheries, energy, and cold-weather engineering.
For a business spending $1M in qualified research, the combined Federal and State benefit significantly lowers the effective cost of innovation, improving cash flow and ROI.
Navigating the Alaska R&D Tax Incentive: IRC Section 41 Adoption and the 18% Federal-Based Credit Mechanism
The Alaska R&D tax incentive is a federal-based credit, utilizing IRC Section 41 definitions for qualified expenditures, but strictly limiting the allowable state credit to 18% of the apportioned federal amount. This financial mechanism ensures definitional consistency while rigorously controlling the fiscal outlay via Alaska Statute AS 43.20.021(d).
This tax structure is claimed as a dollar-for-dollar offset against the Alaska corporation net income tax and is entirely contingent upon a taxpayer first successfully claiming the federal Credit for Increasing Research Activities. By conforming to the federal standard for defining qualified research expenses (QREs), Alaska minimizes its administrative overhead while still supporting investment in innovation.1 The state’s policy relies on the taxpayer meeting all rigorous federal qualification criteria, formalizing the claim through the mandatory filing of Alaska Form 6390 (Alaska Federal-based Credits).3
The Federal Anchor: Deep Analysis of IRC Section 41
The Research Credit Framework and Alaska’s Definitional Link
IRC Section 41 details the statutory basis for the federal Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credit. This section of the Internal Revenue Code provides comprehensive guidelines covering the criteria for qualified activities, the methods for calculating the credit, the types of eligible expenses, and specific exclusions.4
Alaska’s strategic adoption of IRC § 41 is critical to understanding the state incentive. Alaska explicitly adopts the definition of Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) identically as provided under the federal statute.2 This conformity ensures that if a corporation’s research activities meet the exhaustive federal criteria—which cover the design, development, or improvement of products, processes, techniques, formulas, software, or inventions—they are definitionally qualified for the Alaska credit. This is true even if the research itself is not physically conducted within Alaska, provided it occurs within the United States.2
This full definitional conformity offers a substantial benefit to the state’s tax administration. By leveraging the technical rigor and established audit standards of IRC § 41, the Alaska Department of Revenue (DOR) avoids the considerable expense and complexity of establishing and enforcing its own unique regulatory framework for research eligibility. The legal and evidentiary burden for justifying QREs remains firmly rooted in meeting federal audit standards, allowing Alaska to incentivize innovation without incurring the accompanying high compliance costs of an independent R&D program.
The Four-Part Test: Defining Qualified Research Activities (QRAs)
The foundational requirement for any company seeking either the federal or the Alaska R&D tax benefit is successfully applying the four-part test to its research activities. This test confirms that the expenditures relate to true research conducted in the experimental sense.
The four components of this test are:
- Permitted Purpose: The activity must aim to develop or significantly improve the functionality, performance, reliability, or quality of a new or existing business component. A business component can be a product, process, software, technique, formula, or invention.4
- Elimination of Uncertainty: The research must seek to discover information that resolves technical uncertainties. These uncertainties must relate to the appropriate design, the capability, or the method of developing the business component.4
- Process of Experimentation: A systematic process of experimentation must be employed. This involves evaluating one or more alternatives to eliminate the identified technical uncertainties, often taking the form of detailed testing, modeling, or systematic trial-and-error.6
- Technological in Nature: The experimentation process must fundamentally rely on the principles of the hard sciences, such as engineering, physics, chemistry, biology, or computer science.4
Qualified Research Expenses (QREs): The Calculation Base
Once the activities are qualified, the next step involves calculating the QREs, which form the monetary base for the federal credit. This federal QRE amount directly dictates the potential Alaska benefit.
Eligible expenses fall into three main categories under IRC § 41 7:
- Wages: Any wages paid or incurred to an employee for qualified services performed by that employee. The term “wages” adopts the definition provided in IRC Section 3401(a).7 Qualified services include both engaging in qualified research and direct supervision of qualified research.
- Supplies: The cost of tangible property consumed during the research process, excluding land, improvements to land, and property subject to depreciation (capital expenditures).7
- Contract Research Expenses: Generally, 65 percent of amounts paid to outside research organizations for qualified research performed on behalf of the taxpayer.
The Federal R&D credit is then calculated using methods such as the Regular Research Credit (RRC) or the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC), which typically generate a credit ranging from 4% to 7% of eligible spending.6 The determination of the base amount in both methods requires comparing current QREs against historical averages of gross receipts or prior QREs.8
For corporations seeking to maximize their Alaska credit, strategic optimization of the federal calculation method is essential. Since the Alaska credit is fundamentally a percentage of the calculated federal credit amount, any election made at the federal level that increases the IRC § 38 credit—such as electing the ASC if it results in a higher benefit than the RRC—will directly and proportionally increase the final 18% capped Alaska benefit. Therefore, securing the highest potential state credit requires treating the Alaska benefit as a derivative outcome of maximizing the upfront federal incentive.
Alaska’s Statutory Adoption: AS 43.20 and the Federal-Based Model
Statutory Framework: The General Business Credit Flow-Through
Alaska Statute (AS) 43.20 governs the state’s corporate net income tax and establishes general conformity with the Internal Revenue Code (IRC). AS 43.20.021 states that portions of the IRC have full force and effect unless explicitly modified or excepted by other provisions of the chapter.10 The R&D tax credit flows through IRC Section 38 (the General Business Credit, or GBC), making it subject to the state’s modifications.1
It is important to emphasize that Alaska does not operate an independent, stand-alone state R&D tax credit program. The state R&D tax relief available is exclusively structured as a limited, fractional allowance of the federal GBC.5
The Controlling Statutory Provision: AS 43.20.021(d)
The definitive legal constraint on the R&D credit is imposed by Alaska Statute 43.20.021(d). This provision sets the strict percentage limit applicable to corporations:
“Where a credit allowed under the Internal Revenue Code is also allowed in computing Alaska income tax, it is limited to 18 percent for corporations of the amount of credit determined for federal income tax purposes which is attributable to Alaska.” 3
This 18% rule confirms the state’s policy of providing a modest, capped incentive based directly on the federal finding of qualified research.
Furthermore, the 18% limit is not applied to the total federal credit, but specifically to the amount attributable to Alaska.10 This necessitates an intermediate apportionment step for any multi-state taxpayer. The credit base must be calculated by applying Alaska’s specific apportionment rules to the total federal credit generated.
This apportionment requirement highlights a critical policy distinction: although qualified research activities themselves need not be confined to Alaska to qualify for the underlying QREs 2, the actual state tax benefit is fundamentally tied to the corporation’s apportioned economic presence in Alaska (e.g., sales or income sourcing). This correlation ensures that the state’s fiscal incentive primarily rewards corporations that generate revenue within the Alaska market, even if their R&D operations are centralized elsewhere.
Finally, AS 43.20.021(d) contains an exception, stating that the 18% limitation does not apply to the “special industrial incentive tax credit under AS 43.20.042”.10 AS 43.20.042 governs investment credits, historically directed toward major capital projects such as gas processing.11 This legislative structure demonstrates a deliberate classification of incentives: general R&D flow-through credits are subject to stringent fiscal caps, whereas certain high-impact, targeted industrial investments are granted distinct, more generous tax relief percentages to spur specific economic development.
Local State Revenue Office Guidance and Compliance
The Role of Alaska Form 6390 (Alaska Federal-based Credits)
Compliance with Alaska’s credit regime is managed by the Department of Revenue (DOR) through Alaska Form 6390. This form is mandatory for any taxpayer claiming federal-based credits against their state income tax return (Forms 6000, 6100, or 6150).1
The primary function of Form 6390, according to the DOR’s guidance, is to ensure the proper ordering and limitation of these federal-based credits.3 This mechanism enforces the AS 43.20.021(d) requirement by calculating the R&D credit at precisely 18% of the apportioned federal amount and sequencing its application against the taxpayer’s final liability.
Credit Application and Carryover Provisions
The Alaska credit provides a powerful tax benefit by functioning as a direct, dollar-for-dollar offset against the Alaska corporation net income tax liability.1
However, the credit’s application is subject to restrictions regarding the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT). The R&D credit cannot be applied against the Alaska AMT.1 Further complicating the sequencing, federal-based credits are only allowed to offset Alaska AMT after all specific Alaska incentive credits have been fully applied.2
To mitigate the risk of credit expiration, particularly for companies that incur significant QREs during pre-revenue or development phases, Alaska offers generous carryover rules. Unused portions of the state credit may be carried back one year and carried forward for up to 20 years.1 This long carryforward period is a significant asset for corporate financial planning, especially within volatile or capital-intensive sectors. It effectively treats the state incentive as a deferred tax asset, guaranteeing future utilization and reducing the risk of forfeiture, thereby increasing the net present value of the R&D investment.
The following table summarizes the key statutory constraints on the Alaska federal-based R&D credit:
Table Title: Statutory Limitations of the Alaska Federal-Based Credit
| Statutory Limit/Provision | Details | Citation/Form |
| Credit Rate Limitation | Limited to 18% of the apportioned federal credit amount (for corporations). | AS 43.20.021(d)3 |
| Eligible Tax Liability | Offset against Corporation Net Income Tax only. | AS 43.20.021(d)1 |
| AMT Restriction | Cannot be applied against Alaska Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT). | 1 |
| Definitional Base | Adopts definition of Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) exactly as defined in IRC Section 41. | 2 |
| Filing Requirement | Mandatory filing of Alaska Form 6390 (Alaska Federal-based Credits). | 1 |
| Carryback/Forward | Carry back 1 year, carry forward 20 years. | 1 |
Case Study: Calculating the Alaska R&D Tax Benefit
Scenario Overview: Oil & Gas Component Manufacturer
The following example is based on a multi-year study of an Anchorage-based company specializing in designing and manufacturing components for the critical oil and gas industry.1 The company’s engineering activities consistently qualify under the IRC § 41 four-part test. For simplicity in demonstrating the 18% cap, this case assumes the company’s income is 100% attributable to Alaska, meaning no apportionment is required. Over the four-year period examined, the company generated $3,300,000 in QREs and qualified for a total of $330,000 in federal R&D tax credits.1
Step-by-Step Calculation: Applying the 18% Rule
The state credit calculation involves applying the 18% limitation specified in AS 43.20.021(d) directly to the annual federal credit amount.1
Table Title: Alaska R&D Tax Credit Case Study (Oil & Gas Component Manufacturer)
| Year | Total Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) | Federal Credit Claimed (IRC § 41/38) | Alaska Credit Calculation | Alaska Credit (18% Cap) |
| 2021 | $1,300,000 | $130,000 | $\$130,000 \times 0.18$ | $23,400$ |
| 2020 | $900,000 | $90,000 | $\$90,000 \times 0.18$ | $16,200$ |
| 2019 | $650,000 | $65,000 | $\$65,000 \times 0.18$ | $11,700$ |
| 2018 | $450,000 | $45,000 | $\$45,000 \times 0.18$ | $8,100$ |
| Total | $3,300,000 | $330,000 | Total Federal Credit: $330,000 | Total Alaska Credit: $59,400$ |
Source: 1
Over the four-year period, the company qualified for $59,400 in Alaska R&D tax credits. This calculation explicitly demonstrates that the Alaska credit is derived solely by multiplying the pre-apportioned federal credit amount by the statutory 18% rate.
The Impact of Apportionment (Hypothetical Multi-State Entity)
If the same company were a multi-state entity, the calculation would require the intermediate step of apportionment. Assume, for instance, that based on Alaska’s apportionment formula, only 60% of the company’s total income is attributable to Alaska.
In the 2021 tax year, the process would be:
- Determine Federal Credit Attributable to Alaska: $\$130,000 \times 60\% = \$78,000$
- Calculate Alaska Credit (18% Cap): $\$78,000 \times 18\% = \$14,040$
This hypothetical scenario illustrates that the 18% limitation is the secondary restriction. The most consequential variable for multi-state corporations is the apportionment formula itself, which defines the eligible credit base before the 18% cap is applied. Rigorous and accurate adherence to Alaska’s specific income and sales sourcing rules is paramount for calculating the maximum potential state benefit.
Strategic Implications and Conclusion
Policy Analysis: Balancing Innovation Support with Fiscal Prudence
Alaska’s model for R&D tax relief represents a conscious policy decision to support economic sectors reliant on technology and innovation—such as oil/gas, specialized manufacturing, and aquaculture—while simultaneously enforcing stringent fiscal controls.6 The adoption of IRC § 41 provides a high, nationally consistent standard for technical qualification, thereby protecting the state incentive from claims based on routine engineering or development work.4 Conversely, the mandatory 18% cap, enforced by AS 43.20.021(d), ensures that the state’s financial exposure remains measured and predictable, balancing competitiveness with budgetary responsibility.
Recommendations for Corporate Tax Strategy
- Integrated Federal and State Compliance: The Alaska R&D credit must be treated as a fully integrated, downstream component of the federal tax strategy. Every element of the claim, including the QRE calculation base and the detailed documentation (technical narratives, labor records), must first be fully defensible under the standards and methodology of IRC § 41.
- Meticulous Apportionment Defense: For corporations operating across multiple jurisdictions, dedicated analysis is required to accurately determine the portion of the federal credit attributable to Alaska. Since the apportionment percentage is applied before the 18% cap, it is the primary factor dictating the quantum of the state benefit.
- Credit Utilization Planning: Proactive tax modeling based on Alaska Form 6390 principles is essential. This planning must account for the credit ordering rules, ensuring the R&D credit is applied correctly against net income tax and recognizing the prohibition against offsetting the Alaska AMT. The robust 20-year carryforward window provides significant flexibility, which should be modeled to maximize deferred tax assets and enhance future cash flows.
Final Synthesis: Nuanced Adoption
The meaning of IRC Section 41 Adoption in the context of the Alaska R&D tax credit is distinctly nuanced. IRC § 41 acts first as the definitional gateway, supplying the necessary standards and compliance rigor for qualified expenditures. Secondly, the calculated federal credit serves as the monetary base for the state incentive. Alaska’s statutory intervention, AS 43.20.021(d), then limits this federal-derived amount to a corporation’s apportioned activities and applies the final, controlling 18% financial cap. This structure defines Alaska’s fiscally conservative approach to technology incentives: reliable in its technical foundation, yet rigorously controlled in its financial outlay.
Are you eligible?
Why choose us?
Pass an Audit?
What is the R&D Tax Credit?
The Research & Experimentation Tax Credit (or R&D Tax Credit), is a general business tax credit under Internal Revenue Code section 41 for companies that incur research and development (R&D) costs in the United States. The credits are a tax incentive for performing qualified research in the United States, resulting in a credit to a tax return. For the first three years of R&D claims, 6% of the total qualified research expenses (QRE) form the gross credit. In the 4th year of claims and beyond, a base amount is calculated, and an adjusted expense line is multiplied times 14%. Click here to learn more.
Never miss a deadline again
Stay up to date on IRS processes
Discover R&D in your industry
R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services
Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.
If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.
R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services
creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.
Our Fees
Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/
Choose your state
