Qualified Capital Expenditure (QCE)
"Tangible personal property acquired specifically for the conduct of qualified research within Alaska, excluding general administrative assets."
— Core Definition based on AS 43.20.021 & IRC § 41
Explore this interactive report to understand how Alaska rewards infrastructure investment in R&D, distinguishing between standard operational costs and true innovation drivers.
Legal Framework & Nuance
Understanding the specific statutory requirements is critical. Unlike federal credits that prioritize wages, Alaska places heavy emphasis on the physical tools of innovation.
Alaska Statute 43.20.021
The statute adopts the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41 definition of qualified research expenses but modifies it to strictly apply to activities conducted within the geographic borders of Alaska.
Key Takeaway: The expenditure must be "directly related" to the research. General overhead or dual-use property often fails the audit test unless the "Substantially All" (80%+) rule is met.
Criteria for Qualification
- ✓ Tangible Property: Must be physical equipment (e.g., spectrometers, test rigs, prototype machinery).
- ✓ Direct R&D Use: The item's primary purpose must be experimentation, testing, or development.
- ✓ Useful Life: Typically depreciable property with a useful life exceeding 1 year.
- ✕ Exclusion: Land, buildings, and general administrative assets are strictly excluded.
State Revenue Guidance
The Alaska Department of Revenue strictly interprets "Qualified Research." While Federal law allows for a broader interpretation of "supplies," Alaska audits focus heavily on the location of the asset.
Allocation of Typical R&D Budget
Visualizing where "Qualified Capital Expenditures" fit within a typical tech/industrial budget in Alaska.
The "Qualified" Simulator
Review the assets below. Which ones are Qualified Capital Expenditures (QCE)?
Electron Microscope
Cost: $150,000
Payroll Server
Cost: $25,000
Arctic Test Rig
Cost: $85,000
New Lab Building
Cost: $2,500,000
Impact Estimator
Adjust the slider to see how increasing your Qualified Capital Expenditure impacts your potential Alaska Tax Credit.
*Note: This is a simplified projection based on a standard 10% credit rate for qualifying expenses exceeding a base amount. Actual results vary based on gross receipts.
Investment vs. Tax Benefit Curve
Compliance & Reporting Checklist
Identify Assets
Review fixed asset ledger. Segregate items used >80% for R&D vs. mixed-use assets.
Verify Location
Ensure all claimed assets are physically located and operational within Alaska state lines.
Calculate Base
Determine your base amount (historic R&D spending) to calculate the incremental credit available.
File Form 6300
Submit the Alaska Incentive Tax Credit Form with your corporate tax return.
"The burden of proof rests on the taxpayer to demonstrate the nexus between the capital expenditure and the qualified research activity."
Strategic Clarity: Deconstructing Qualified Capital Expenditure (QCE) in the Context of the Alaska R&D Tax Credit
I. Executive Summary and Statutory Conflict
A Qualified Capital Expenditure (QCE) refers specifically to capitalized costs, primarily lease expenditures for geological or geophysical exploration, as defined under Alaska’s oil and gas tax statutes (AS 43.55). In the context of the Alaska Research and Development (R&D) tax credit (AS 43.20), QCEs are generally excluded because the state credit adopts the federal definition of Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) found in Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41, which systematically prohibits the inclusion of expenditures for capitalized property.
The inherent complexity in navigating Alaskan tax incentives stems from the state’s dual approach to encouraging investment. The term “Qualified Capital Expenditure” (QCE) is fundamentally linked to a specific, historical incentive structure within Title 43, Chapter 55, dedicated to oil and gas exploration and production.1 These expenditures are, by their nature, long-lived assets that must be capitalized under federal tax principles.3
In stark contrast, the Alaska R&D tax credit is not a purely unique state credit but rather an attribution credit entirely dependent on and limited by the calculation of the federal R&D tax credit, which is governed by IRC Section 41.4 IRC §41, the federal foundation for the Alaska R&D credit, explicitly excludes expenditures for capitalized property, land, and improvements to land from being Qualified Research Expenses (QREs).6 Therefore, nearly all costs that meet the criteria for Alaska’s definition of a QCE—which necessitates capitalization—are immediately disqualified from being included in the QRE base for the state R&D credit calculation.
This statutory divergence creates a significant point of confusion for taxpayers operating in Alaska, particularly those in the resource sector. The analysis of these two tax regimes reveals that the state legislature utilized similar terminology (“Qualified Expenditure”) across two systems designed for entirely different policy goals: one focused on broad technological innovation (R&D credit) and the other focused exclusively on physical resource extraction (Oil & Gas credits). The key distinction for tax compliance is that the Alaska R&D credit functions merely as a percentage adjustment (18%) to the federal QRE calculation, not as a separate mechanism with its own expenditure definitions.8
II. Statutory Definition and Context of Qualified Capital Expenditure (QCE)
To understand why QCEs are excluded from the R&D credit base, it is essential to first define the term strictly within its originating statutory context: Alaska Statute (AS) 43.55.
II.A. QCE Defined in Alaska Statutes Title 43, Chapter 55
The definition of “qualified capital expenditure” is codified under AS 43.55.023(o).2 The term outlines specific types of expenditures related to resource exploration that the state historically incentivized through various tax credit programs under Chapter 55, which governs the oil and gas production tax.
A QCE must satisfy two key statutory requirements:
- It must constitute a lease expenditure as defined under AS 43.55.165.3
- The expenditure must be incurred for geological or geophysical exploration.2
Alternatively, the statute clarifies that a QCE must be treated as a capitalized expenditure under 26 U.S.C. (Internal Revenue Code), irrespective of any elections made by the taxpayer.3 This mandatory capitalization requirement is definitive and distinguishes QCEs from deductible or expensed operational costs.
II.B. The Capitalization Mandate and Tax Regime
The classification of QCE as a capitalized asset is central to its purpose within the AS 43.55 framework. These expenditures, such as those related to drilling rig mobilization, onsite operations, and seismic data acquisition 10, are not intended for immediate expensing or to be categorized as consumable supplies. They represent long-term investments in tangible or intangible property associated with resource development.11
Historically, QCEs were critical components used to generate refundable and transferable tax credit certificates under AS 43.55, designed to offset Alaska Production Tax liability.12 Furthermore, these capitalized lease expenditures are integral to the calculation of the Production Tax Value (PTV), where they are subtracted from the Gross Value at the Point of Production (GVPP).13
It is also important to note the historical and geographical limitations placed on QCEs. For example, QCE credits were subject to legislative limitations, such as the exclusion of QCE credits for North Slope expenditures effective January 1, 2014, although QCEs were previously allowed statewide.11 This history confirms that QCEs are highly specific, geographically and sectorally tailored incentives belonging to the resource extraction regime, reinforcing their separation from general R&D incentives. The legislation’s intense focus on QCEs in AS 43.55 relates to a specific era of resource policy, and the legislative sunsetting or restriction of certain QCE credits further underscores their specialized function, separate from the federally linked R&D tax credit.14
III. The Controlling Standard: Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) under IRC Section 41
The mechanism for the Alaska R&D tax credit (AS 43.20) is defined by its wholesale adoption of the federal standard for Qualified Research Expenses (QREs). This mandate ensures that capitalized costs, including QCEs, are excluded from the credit calculation base.
III.A. Defining the Research Base (QREs)
The Alaska R&D credit explicitly relies on the definition of qualified research expenditures as set forth in IRC Section 41.4 To qualify, expenditures must meet the federal four-part test for Qualified Research Activities (QRAs), which involves demonstrating a purpose relating to a new or improved function, elimination of uncertainty, and a process of experimentation.16
QREs are generally operational expenditures and fall into three primary categories 17:
- Wages: Amounts paid for qualified services performed by employees, including those directly involved in research, supervision, or direct support.6
- Supplies: Items used or consumed during the performance of qualified research, such as raw materials and components destroyed during testing.17
- Contract Research: 65% of amounts paid to non-affiliated third parties to conduct research on the taxpayer’s behalf.18
III.B. The Explicit Exclusion of Capital Expenditures
The foundational incompatibility between a QCE and a QRE rests on the explicit exclusions mandated by federal tax law. IRC Section 41 systematically prohibits the inclusion of expenditures related to capital assets.
The statute defines “supplies” as tangible property other than land or improvements to land.6 More broadly, the R&D credit is strictly limited to non-depreciable costs. Any item that is subject to depreciation (such as facilities, long-lived equipment, or capitalized exploration assets like those defining a QCE) is explicitly excluded from QREs.7
This exclusion is a deliberate policy mechanism. The federal R&D credit (IRC §41) and the rules governing the tax treatment of Research and Experimentation (R&E) costs (IRC §174) are intended to incentivize immediate investment in operational activities that drive innovation.17 Because a QCE is, by the definition in AS 43.55.023(o), a capitalized cost under federal law, it necessarily fails the QRE test. The cost recovery for a QCE must occur through long-term depreciation or amortization, not through the R&D credit mechanism, which is designed for operational, consumed expenses.
The following table summarizes the federal criteria that dictates eligibility for the Alaska R&D credit:
Table 1: Federal R&D Credit (IRC §41) QRE Eligibility Criteria
| Expense Category | Inclusion/Exclusion Rule | IRC Statutory Reference | Significance |
| Wages (Qualified Services) | Included (Direct, Supervisory, Support for research activities) | IRC §41(b)(2)(A)(i) | Forms the largest portion of QREs. Basis for R&D operational reward. |
| Supplies Consumed in Research | Included (Tangible property consumed in R&D) | IRC §41(b)(2)(A)(ii) | Must be consumed/used up; cannot be depreciable. |
| Contract Research Expenses | Included (65% of amounts paid to non-affiliated researchers) | IRC §41(b)(3) | Rewards outsourcing of R&D functions. |
| Land or Improvements to Land | Excluded (Capital Expenditure) | IRC §41(b)(2)(C)(i) | Direct statutory exclusion of QCE-type real property assets. |
| Depreciable Property (Capital Assets) | Excluded (Subject to cost recovery methods other than immediate expensing) | Treasury Reg. § 1.41-2(b)(4) | Primary exclusion preventing QCEs (capitalized assets) from qualifying. |
IV. Alaska Department of Revenue (DOR) Guidance and Filing Requirements
The Alaska Department of Revenue (DOR) guidance confirms the state’s reliance on the federal credit calculation and provides specific mechanisms for claiming the benefit, reinforcing the separation between QCEs and QREs.
IV.A. The Alaska R&D Credit Mechanism (AS 43.20)
The Alaska R&D tax credit is available to companies doing business in the state, and the activities generating the QREs need not be conducted in Alaska to qualify, so long as they occur within the United States.4
The credit is calculated as a fixed percentage of the allowed federal R&D tax credit. Specifically, the Alaska credit is limited to 18% of the amount of the federal credit determined for federal income tax purposes.4 If a taxpayer is taxable both inside and outside Alaska, the credit must first be calculated by apportioning the federal credits generated to Alaska.8 The resulting credit provides a dollar-for-dollar offset against Alaska tax liabilities.8 Unused credits are non-refundable but may be carried back one year and forward for up to 20 years.4
IV.B. DOR’s Guidance on Expense Definitions and Forms
Compliance with Alaska law is achieved through specific forms and adherence to federal definitions. To claim the credit, a company must file Alaska Form 6390 – Alaska Federal-based Credits along with its state tax return (e.g., Form 6000, 6100, or 6150).4 Form 6390 is the mechanism used to limit federal-based credits to the prescribed 18% of the apportioned federal amount.19
The DOR confirms that the definition of qualified research expenses used for the Alaska credit is identically the same as under IRC Section 41.4 For audit purposes, businesses must maintain documentation sufficient to substantiate the federal credit claim, including general ledger detail, payroll records, project notes, and other business communications demonstrating that expenditures meet the QRE definition and adhere to the four-part test.16 This rigorous documentation is crucial for demonstrating that QCEs—which appear in the same sector’s financial records—have been correctly excluded from the QRE base.
IV.C. The Prohibition Against Double Benefits
Alaska law maintains strict rules against using the same expenditure to claim multiple state tax benefits. This policy, often referred to as an anti-stacking rule, reinforces the separation between QCEs and R&D credits.
Guidance relating to the Service Industry Credit (AS 43.20.049) is demonstrative of this policy. The DOR specifies that if an expenditure was the basis upon which a federal income tax credit was claimed, the taxpayer may not claim attribution of that federal credit on its Alaska corporate income tax return (Alaska Form 6390 Federal-based credits).20 Conversely, an expenditure claimed for the Service Industry Credit (which covers the in-state manufacture or modification of tangible personal property with a useful life of three years or more for oil or gas exploration, development, or production 20) may not be used for the R&D credit.
Since QCEs are related to specific AS 43.55 incentives and are characterized by capitalization, the state’s fiscal policy is structured to prevent taxpayers from simultaneously claiming resource-specific benefits and general R&D benefits on the same dollar of spending. This scrutiny is particularly intense for companies operating in the energy sector, where both QCEs and QREs may appear on the books, necessitating absolute clarity in expense segregation during filing and subsequent audits.
The table below outlines the specific calculation steps and limitations imposed by the DOR:
Table 3: Alaska R&D Credit Calculation and Limitations
| Calculation Step | Statutory/Form Requirement | Limitation and Detail | Source |
| 1. Determine Federal QRE Base | IRC §41 (4-Part Test) | Excludes QCEs and all capitalized expenditures.6 | 7 |
| 2. Calculate Federal Credit Amount | Federal Form 6765 / IRC §41 Formula | Based on incremental increase over defined base period. | 4 |
| 3. Apportion Federal Credit to Alaska | AS 43.20, Apportionment Rules | Allocation based on standard state apportionment factors (sales, property, payroll).8 | 8 |
| 4. Calculate Alaska Credit | AS 43.20.021(d) | Limited to 18% of the apportioned federal credit amount. | 5 |
| 5. Claim and Utilize Credit | Alaska Form 6390 | Credit offsets state tax liability; carryback 1 year, carryforward 20 years.4 | 19 |
V. Strategic Analysis: Incompatibility of QCEs and R&D Credit
The statutory, policy, and accounting differences between Qualified Capital Expenditures and Qualified Research Expenses confirm their inherent incompatibility for R&D tax credit claims.
V.A. Policy Objectives Divergence
The two expenditure types serve entirely different state policy objectives. The QCE mechanism under AS 43.55 was designed specifically to spur large-scale, long-term investments in physical resource infrastructure and exploration, such as major geological surveys or drilling projects necessary for energy supply.10
In contrast, the R&D credit, based on IRC §41, is aimed at rewarding the intellectual and human capital involved in the process of experimentation—the costs associated with developing new or improved products, processes, or software.16 It focuses on rewarding short-term operational costs like salaries and consumed materials.17 Attempting to classify a large, capitalized investment (QCE) as an operational expense (QRE) fundamentally misrepresents the nature of the tax incentives.
V.B. The Role of Depreciation and Capitalization
The most significant legal barrier is the mandatory capitalization of QCEs. Since QCEs are required to be treated as capitalized expenditures under federal law 3, they are destined for recovery through depreciation or amortization over their useful life, providing a consistent tax shield against income over many years.
Allowing a QCE, which is a depreciable or capitalized asset, to also generate a credit under IRC §41 would violate the principle against dual tax benefits, granting both immediate credit relief and long-term depreciation. Conversely, QREs are fundamentally non-depreciable, focusing only on costs incurred and consumed during the period of research.6
The careful delineation in Alaska’s statutes further underscores this separation. For example, AS 43.55.023(o)(2) specifically excludes certain seismic expenses conducted within a production unit from the general QCE definition.3 This level of statutory tailoring illustrates that the legislature precisely controls which capital exploration activities are eligible for the O&G incentive structure, which is completely distinct from the general technological R&D framework.
The relationship between these terms and related tax benefits is summarized below:
Table 2: Comparison of Alaska Tax Credit Terminology
| Term | Governing Statute | Nature of Expenditure | Eligibility for Alaska R&D Credit |
| Qualified Capital Expenditure (QCE) | AS 43.55.023(o) 2 | Capitalized Lease/Exploration Cost (Geological/Geophysical exploration, capitalized under 26 U.S.C.) | Generally Excluded (Due to conflict with IRC §41 capital exclusion) |
| Qualified Research Expenditure (QRE) | IRC §41 (Adopted by AS 43.20) 4 | Operational costs: Wages, Supplies, Contract Research | Included (Basis for the 18% attribution credit) |
| Service Industry Expenditure (AS 43.20.049) | AS 43.20.049 20 | In-state manufacture/modification of tangible property for O&G (use life > 3 years) | Excluded (Cannot be claimed simultaneously with R&D credit via Form 6390) |
VI. Case Study and Calculation Example: Applying the QRE Exclusion
A practical example illustrates how a company operating in the resource sector must rigorously separate its operational research costs (QREs) from its capitalized exploration costs (QCEs) to properly calculate the Alaska R&D tax credit.
VI.A. Scenario: Aurora Tech Drilling Solutions
Aurora Tech Drilling Solutions is an Alaska-based company engaged in two activities: (1) developing proprietary artificial intelligence software for optimizing drilling efficiency, and (2) performing capitalized geological surveys for new exploration leases.
Expenses Incurred in 2024:
- Wages paid to software engineers developing the automation system (Operational R&D Labor): $800,000
- Cost of consumable supplies used in software testing and small-scale prototyping (Non-Depreciable Supplies): $50,000
- Payment for a new geological/geophysical exploration lease survey, treated as a capitalized lease expenditure under AS 43.55.023(o) (QCE): $1,500,000
- Contract Research paid to an Alaskan university for specialized materials analysis (65% eligible): $100,000
VI.B. Step-by-Step R&D Credit Calculation
- Determine Federal Qualified Research Expenses (QREs):
The calculation must strictly adhere to IRC §41.
- Wages: $800,000
- Supplies: $50,000
- Contract Research (65%): $100,000 $\times 0.65 = \$65,000$
- Geological Survey/Capitalized Lease Expenditure (QCE): $\$1,500,000$ is EXCLUDED. This expense is a capitalized asset for geological or geophysical exploration and is prohibited from being included in the QRE base under IRC §41, as it is classified as land improvement or depreciable property.6
- Total Federal QREs: $\$800,000 + \$50,000 + \$65,000 = \mathbf{\$915,000}$
- Calculate Federal R&D Credit:
Assuming, for simplicity, that the incremental calculation results in a federal credit rate of 10% of the QREs (Federal Form 6765):
- Federal Credit: $\$915,000 \times 10\% = \mathbf{\$91,500}$
- Apportionment to Alaska:
Aurora Tech’s operational activity is determined to be 75% apportioned to Alaska (based on sales, property, and payroll factors).8
- Apportioned Federal Credit: $\$91,500 \times 75\% = \mathbf{\$68,625}$
- Calculate Alaska R&D Credit:
The Alaska credit is limited to 18% of the apportioned federal credit.5
- Alaska Credit (Form 6390): $\$68,625 \times 18\% = \mathbf{\$12,352.50}$
VI.C. Conclusion of Example
The $\mathbf{\$1,500,000}$ Qualified Capital Expenditure provides zero benefit to the Alaska R&D credit calculation. This exclusion is mandatory because the expense, as a capitalized lease expenditure for exploration, is definitionally incompatible with the Qualified Research Expense definition used by both the federal government and the Alaska Department of Revenue. The company’s compliance hinges on properly separating this capitalized expense from the operational research costs eligible for the credit.
VII. Conclusion and Recommendations for Alaska Taxpayers
The analysis confirms that the term Qualified Capital Expenditure (QCE) holds specific meaning only within Alaska’s oil and gas taxation structure (AS 43.55) and is fundamentally incompatible with the calculation of the Alaska R&D tax credit (AS 43.20). This incompatibility arises because the Alaska R&D credit is derived exclusively from the federal Qualified Research Expense (QRE) base (IRC §41), which expressly excludes all capitalized and depreciable assets.
VII.A. Summary of Findings
- QCE Definition: QCEs are capital costs, primarily lease expenditures for geological or geophysical exploration, required to be capitalized under the Internal Revenue Code.3
- R&D Credit Base: The Alaska R&D credit is an attribution credit, equal to 18% of the apportioned federal IRC §41 credit.5
- Mandatory Exclusion: Due to the federal definition of QREs, which excludes depreciable property and land improvements 6, capitalized QCEs cannot be included in the R&D credit base.
- Compliance Mechanism: The credit is claimed via Alaska Form 6390 – Alaska Federal-based Credits.19
VII.B. Strategic Compliance Recommendations
For any company operating in Alaska, particularly those in the energy, mining, or manufacturing sectors that incur substantial capital costs alongside research activities, the following compliance measures are recommended to manage audit risk and maximize eligible incentives:
- Rigorous Expense Classification and Documentation: Taxpayers must maintain a clear, auditable distinction between operational R&D costs (QREs, typically payroll and consumed supplies) and capitalized investments (QCEs or general depreciable assets). The general ledger detail must explicitly segregate expenditures to substantiate the federal Form 6765 and, consequently, the state Form 6390.16
- Adherence to Anti-Double-Dipping Rules: Companies must ensure that capital expenditures or lease costs utilized for historical or ongoing specific Alaska incentive programs (e.g., AS 43.55 credits or the Service Industry Credit under AS 43.20.049) are completely separate from the expenditures claimed as QREs for the R&D credit. Claiming the same expense under two separate state incentives will lead to immediate disallowance and potential penalties.20
Tax Planning Focus: The greatest benefit of the Alaska R&D credit (the 18% attribution) is derived from high-wage, technologically focused activities, such as software development, process engineering, and materials testing, which generate non-capital QREs. Tax planning efforts should concentrate on maximizing these operational expenditures, as large capital acquisitions will provide no direct R&D credit benefit, although they may still qualify for federal depreciation and state lease expenditure deductions.
Are you eligible?
Why choose us?
Pass an Audit?
What is the R&D Tax Credit?
The Research & Experimentation Tax Credit (or R&D Tax Credit), is a general business tax credit under Internal Revenue Code section 41 for companies that incur research and development (R&D) costs in the United States. The credits are a tax incentive for performing qualified research in the United States, resulting in a credit to a tax return. For the first three years of R&D claims, 6% of the total qualified research expenses (QRE) form the gross credit. In the 4th year of claims and beyond, a base amount is calculated, and an adjusted expense line is multiplied times 14%. Click here to learn more.
Never miss a deadline again
Stay up to date on IRS processes
Discover R&D in your industry
R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services
Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.
If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.
R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services
creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.
Our Fees
Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/
Choose your state
