Alaska R&D Tax Credit: O&G Service Industry Report

Qualified Oil & Gas Service Expenditure

"Qualified Expenditures" in this context refer to specific costs—primarily wages, supplies, and contract research—incurred by Oil & Gas service companies in Alaska for the development of new or improved technical processes, eligible for tax relief under AS 43.20.021.

Unlike production taxes, this relates to the Corporate Income Tax credit for Research and Development. It is distinct from exploration incentives; it rewards the methodology of extraction, not the discovery of resources.

Legal Basis
IRC § 41 & AS 43.20

Alaska adopts the federal definition of Qualified Research Expenditures (QREs) but limits it to in-state activities.

Eligible Costs
Wages & Supplies

Includes wages for researchers, supplies used in testing, and 65% of contract research expenses.

Crucial Distinction
R&D vs. Exploration

Finding oil is "Exploration" (ineligible). Developing a new way to find oil is "R&D" (eligible).

Report Context: The Service Industry Perspective

The Oil and Gas Service Industry differs from Producers (leaseholders). While Producers focus on the volume of extraction, Service companies (e.g., seismic analysis, drilling technology, environmental engineering) focus on the technology of extraction.

Under Alaska Department of Revenue guidance, for an expenditure to be "Qualified," it must pass the "Business Component" test. For a service company, the "product" being improved is often the process or technique sold to the Producer. If a service company develops a novel thermal imaging technique for pipeline integrity in sub-zero temperatures, the costs associated with developing that technique (not just executing it) are Qualified Expenditures.

Generated for Educational Purposes Only. Consult a qualified tax professional for specific advice regarding AS 43.20.021.

The Alaska Qualified Oil and Gas Service Industry Expenditure Credit (AS 43.20.049): Compliance, Limitations, and Strategic Context

I. Executive Summary: Defining the QOGSIE Credit

The Qualified Oil and Gas Service Industry Expenditure (QOGSIE) credit is a non-refundable, corporate income tax incentive designed to promote the in-state manufacture or modification of tangible personal property used in Alaska’s oil and gas sector. This credit allows eligible taxpayers to offset state tax liability based on 10% of qualifying expenditures, subject to an annual limit of $10 million.1

This incentive, codified under Alaska Statutes (AS) 43.20.049, functions as a critical economic development tool. It rewards physical, capital-intensive labor and supply procurement strictly within Alaska’s borders. Unlike credits that target general research, the QOGSIE statute is narrowly focused on localized industrial activity that supports the exploration, development, and production phases of the oil and gas lifecycle, requiring meticulous cost classification to ensure compliance.1

II. Statutory and Contextual Framework of Alaska Tax Incentives

A. Legislative Intent: Driving In-State Economic Activity

The State of Alaska has a long history of utilizing tax incentives to stabilize and encourage investment within its crucial oil and gas sector. Since 2003, the legislature established various credits aimed at incentivizing new exploration, development, and production, and encouraging smaller producers to enter the Alaska market.4 Regulatory shifts, such as the transition from a gross value production tax to a net profit system in 2006, underscored the need for these mechanisms to maintain industry stability.5

The introduction of the QOGSIE credit, effective for expenditures incurred after January 1, 2014 2, reflects a strategic maturation of the state’s incentive policy. Earlier programs often included refundable or “cashable” credits tied to the Oil and Gas Tax Credit Fund (AS 43.55.028).4 While the state paid these credits in full from 2008 through 2015, a significant drop in oil prices led to fiscal challenges. By 2021, an estimated $744 million in outstanding credit certificates remained pending state purchase, creating financial and constitutional volatility for the state.4

The strict non-refundable and non-transferable nature of the QOGSIE credit 6 is a direct consequence of this historical fiscal pressure. This design choice strategically limits the state’s financial risk, ensuring that the credit can only reduce an existing corporate income tax liability and cannot function as a direct cash subsidy or be sold to a third party. This structural feature provides certainty for the state budget while offering significant, long-term tax relief for qualified service providers. Furthermore, the QOGSIE credit currently appears to be a permanent fixture in state law, providing long-term certainty for industry investment planning with no legislated sunset or expiration date.2

B. The Core Distinction: QOGSIE (AS 43.20.049) vs. Federal-Based R&D Credit

Understanding the Qualified Oil and Gas Service Industry Expenditure credit requires careful differentiation from the separate, but related, Federal-Based Alaska R&D Credit. These two mechanisms serve distinct purposes and are governed by different statutory rules, presenting taxpayers with a crucial decision regarding which credit base to utilize for overlapping expenditures.

The QOGSIE Credit (AS 43.20.049) is dedicated to incentivizing localized manufacturing and modification services for hard assets (tangible personal property) used in extraction activities.1 Its structure provides a 10% credit calculated directly on the qualified costs incurred in Alaska.2

The Federal-Based R&D Credit is a broader general business credit derived from federal law (IRC § 41, the Credit for Increasing Research Activities).8 Alaska allows a state credit equal to eighteen percent (18%) of the federal R&D credit apportioned to Alaska under AS 43.20.021.9 This credit covers a broader scope of research activities, including Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) such as wages, supplies, and contract research expenditures.11

The critical difference for taxpayers is the geographic and activity focus. QOGSIE demands in-state execution of manufacture or modification services, whereas the Federal-Based R&D Credit allows research conducted anywhere in the United States to qualify for the federal base.8 Moreover, while the QOGSIE rate (10% of expenditure) may seem lower than the Federal-Based credit rate (18%), the latter is calculated on the apportioned federal credit, which often results in a lower effective percentage of the total state expenditure base, even though it features a significantly longer carryforward period of 20 years.9

III. Comprehensive Definition of Qualified Oil and Gas Service Industry Expenditure (QOGSIE)

The rigorous definition of QOGSIE is the foundation of compliance. An expenditure must meet specific criteria related to the activity, location, and nature of the property involved.

A. The Statutory Definition and Scope

Alaska Statutes § 43.20.049 defines QOGSIE as “an expenditure directly attributable to an in-state manufacture or in-state modification of tangible personal property used in the exploration for, development of, or production of oil or gas deposits”.1

This definition contains several mandatory tests:

  1. In-State Activity: The manufacture or modification must occur within Alaska.1 This location restriction is strictly enforced and is central to the credit’s purpose of boosting the local service economy.
  2. Tangible Personal Property (TPP): The expenditure must result in or be for the modification of tangible personal property.1
  3. Mandatory TPP Useful Life: The TPP must have a useful life of three years or more.2 This criterion prevents the credit from subsidizing consumables, routine maintenance supplies, or short-term rental equipment, focusing the incentive on capital-intensive asset creation or refurbishment.
  4. Qualifying Use: The TPP must be demonstrably linked to the primary stages of oil or gas operations: exploration (e.g., specialized logging tools, modified seismic arrays), development (e.g., fabrication of drilling modules, subsea structures), or production (e.g., components for pipelines or processing facilities).1

B. Alaska DOR Guidance on Inclusions and Exclusions

The Alaska Department of Revenue (DOR) provides necessary regulatory clarity, particularly concerning the separation of qualifying inputs from general operational overhead. The guidance, often outlined in documentation related to the service industry credit, establishes critical boundaries for expenditure qualification.6

1. Inclusions (Qualifying Activities)

Expenditures that qualify are those incurred in Alaska and directly attributable to the manufacture or modification of the qualifying TPP.6 Specifically, the following costs generally qualify:

  • Services and Supplies: Expenditures for services (primarily direct labor wages and contract labor) and supplies (raw materials, components, and items that become integrated into the final asset) used directly to manufacture or modify the qualifying tangible personal property are eligible.6

2. Exclusions (Non-Qualifying Costs)

The statute and DOR guidance enforce several key exclusions to ensure the credit is not used to subsidize costs that are not directly incorporated into the O&G asset:

  • Equipment Used in the Process: QOGSIE does not include components or equipment used in the process of the manufacturing or modification.6 This refers to depreciable machinery and tools used by the service provider (e.g., welding robots, heavy lifting gear, testing equipment).1 The expenditure is meant to subsidize the creation of the O&G asset, not the service provider’s underlying infrastructure.
  • Facilities: Expenditures for facilities, including costs associated with leasing, construction, maintenance, insurance, and utilities for the physical fabrication shop or office space, also do not qualify.6

This distinction requires taxpayers to segregate costs meticulously. Costs related to generating manufacturing capacity (non-qualifying, such as a capital expense for a new factory lathe) must be separated from the direct input costs required for the production of the O&G asset (qualifying, such as the direct labor wages and the specialized steel used). This narrow scope ensures the credit directly subsidizes the labor and materials incorporated into the Alaska oil and gas value chain.

Table 2: QOGSIE Cost Classification Matrix

Activity/Expenditure Type QOGSIE Status Statutory Basis/DOR Rationale
In-state employee wages for direct modification work Qualified Expenditures for services directly attributable to manufacture/modification 6
Raw materials (e.g., specialized steel) used in manufacture Qualified Expenditures for supplies used to manufacture tangible property 6
Acquisition of a new welding robot or CNC machine Non-Qualified Excluded as components or equipment used in the process of manufacturing/modification 6
Lease payment for the Anchorage fabrication facility Non-Qualified Expenditures for facilities do not qualify 6
General overhead, insurance, and utilities Non-Qualified General overhead/facilities costs are excluded 6
Freight and logistics costs for raw materials within Alaska Qualified (Generally) Can be classified as part of supplies directly attributable to the manufacture.

IV. Credit Mechanics, Limitations, and Carryforward Strategy

The operational rules governing the QOGSIE credit define its utility and necessitate careful tax planning. The parameters are designed to limit the state’s exposure while providing a significant incentive.

A. Credit Rate and Annual Maximum Claim Cap

The QOGSIE credit is straightforwardly calculated:

  • Rate: The credit is calculated at 10% of the total Qualified Oil and Gas Service Industry Expenditure (QEA) incurred during the tax year.2
  • Annual Cap on Application: The total amount of credit a taxpayer may apply against its tax liability in any single tax year may not exceed $10,000,000.2

This maximum limit acts as a crucial strategic constraint. If a taxpayer generates $20 million in calculated credit (based on $200 million in QEA), they can only claim $10 million in the current year, regardless of their total tax liability. The excess credit must be carried forward, compelling taxpayers involved in very large projects to establish a multi-year recovery plan to monetize the full credit benefit.6

B. Non-Refundable Status and Carryforward Provisions

As discussed in the legislative context, the credit is strictly non-refundable and non-transferable.6 This means the credit can only offset the taxpayer’s current or future Alaska corporate income tax liability.

  • Carryforward Rule: Any unused portion of the QOGSIE credit that exceeds the taxpayer’s current-year liability may be carried forward for five years.2
  • Carryforward Limit Application: The Alaska Department of Revenue (DOR) guidance confirms that if a portion of the credit is carried forward, the taxpayer may still claim a maximum of $10,000,000 in the subsequent year. This $10 million cap applies to the total claim, combining the carryforward amount and any newly generated credit from that subsequent year.6

The five-year carryforward period is relatively restrictive when compared to the 20-year federal carryforward standard applied to the Federal-Based R&D credit.13 This short window places substantial pressure on taxpayers generating large credits to maintain stable profitability and tax liability in Alaska to fully utilize the balance before it expires, emphasizing the need for robust long-range tax forecasting.

V. Alaska Department of Revenue (DOR) Compliance and Reporting Requirements

The mechanics of claiming the QOGSIE credit involve specific forms and rigorous internal documentation, particularly concerning the anti-double benefit rules.

A. Mandatory Forms and Filing Procedures

The QOGSIE credit is not subject to a separate application process; it is claimed directly on the taxpayer’s annual corporate income tax return.6

  1. Corporate Income Tax Returns: The credit is attached to the relevant corporate return (Form 6000, 6100, or 6150).9
  2. Credit Ordering (Form 6300): Corporations claiming QOGSIE, or any other nonrefundable incentive credit, must file Alaska Form 6300 (Alaska Incentive Credits).14 This form is used to properly order the application of multiple credits against the tax liability.14 QOGSIE, being an incentive credit, is generally applied before federal-based credits like the R&D credit.14
  3. Expedited Filing Exclusion: Due to the complexity and importance of substantiating this credit, any corporation claiming the Oil and Gas Service Industry Credit is ineligible for the simplified Revenue Online Expedited Filing option and must file the complete corporate return.15

B. Partnership Reporting Requirements

The QOGSIE credit maintains its flow-through nature when incurred by an entity taxed as a partnership.

  • Partnership Reporting: The partnership must calculate the credit and report the details on Alaska Partnership Return, Form 6900.6
  • Partner Claim: The credit flows through to the corporate partner via Form 6900, Schedule K-1, allowing the corporate partner to claim its allocated share of the credit against its Alaska corporate tax liability. This flow-through amount is then included on the corporate partner’s Form 6300.16

C. Anti-Double Benefit Rules

The most critical area of compliance for multi-state or diversified service companies is adherence to the DOR’s anti-double benefit rules, established under AS 43.20.049(f). These rules prevent taxpayers from receiving both a credit and a deduction or a credit based on overlapping federal claims.6

1. Non-Deductibility of QOGSIE Expenditures

The taxpayer is explicitly prohibited from claiming a deduction when calculating Alaska corporate net income tax for any expenditure that forms the basis of the service industry credit.6 If a company claims $100 million in Qualified Expenditures (QEA), generating a $10 million credit, that $100 million must be added back to the calculation of Alaska net income if it was otherwise expensed in determining federal taxable income. This ensures the taxpayer receives the benefit of the credit, but not the dual benefit of reducing taxable income through deduction and reducing tax liability through credit.

2. Non-Attribution to Federal Credits

The statute mandates strict segregation from the Federal-Based R&D Credit. If an expenditure was used as the basis upon which a federal income tax credit was claimed (e.g., as a Qualified Research Expense, or QRE, on IRS Form 6765), the taxpayer may not claim attribution of that federal credit on its Alaska corporate income tax return using Alaska Form 6390 (Federal-based credits).6

This restriction forces taxpayers to make a hard election between the two state credit paths for any overlapping costs (such as the wages of an engineer involved in designing and fabricating a new piece of equipment). The choice hinges on whether the 10% QOGSIE rate with the 5-year carryforward is more advantageous than the 18% apportioned Federal-Based R&D Credit with its 20-year carryforward period. Meticulous tracking is required to ensure that expenditures used for QOGSIE are segregated and excluded from the QRE base used for Form 6390 calculations.

VI. Case Study: Calculating and Claiming the QOGSIE Credit

To illustrate the application of the statutory limitations and compliance requirements, consider a detailed scenario involving a significant fabrication project.

A. Scenario: Fabrication of a Specialized North Slope Drilling Tool

  • Taxpayer: North Slope Services Co. (NSS), a C-Corporation operating solely in Alaska.
  • Project: Fabrication of a high-pressure manifold assembly (tangible personal property with a 20-year useful life) to be used for gas development in the North Slope.
  • Tax Year 2025 Liability: NSS forecasts an Alaska Corporate Net Income Tax Liability of $15,000,000 (before any credits).
  • Total Project Costs Incurred in Alaska: $110,000,000

B. Identification and Classification of Costs

NSS must classify its $110,000,000 in expenditures based on the DOR’s strict inclusions and exclusions 6:

Cost Category Amount Incurred ($) Classification Rule Qualified (Y/N)
Direct Fabrication Wages (in-state services) 70,000,000 Services directly attributable to TPP manufacture. Y
Raw Materials and Supplies (integrated into the manifold) 30,000,000 Supplies used to manufacture TPP. Y
New Depreciable Production Equipment (Lathes, Cranes) 5,000,000 Equipment used in the process of manufacturing. N
Lease and Utility Costs for Anchorage Facility 5,000,000 Expenditures for facilities. N
Total Expenditure 110,000,000

C. Detailed Calculation of the Credit

  1. Total Qualified Oil and Gas Service Industry Expenditure (QEA):
    The QEA includes only the direct wages and integrated supplies.

    $$QEA = \$70,000,000 \text{ (Wages)} + \$30,000,000 \text{ (Supplies)} = \$100,000,000$$
  2. Calculated QOGSIE Credit (10% of QEA):

    $$\text{Calculated Credit} = \$100,000,000 \times 10\% = \$10,000,000$$
  3. Annual Maximum Limitation Check:
  • The calculated credit is $10,000,000.
  • The statutory annual maximum claim is $10,000,000.3
  • Since the calculated credit meets the annual cap exactly, the Credit Claimable in 2025 is $10,000,000.

D. Application and Compliance

  • Application: NSS applies the $10,000,000 QOGSIE credit against its $15,000,000 pre-credit tax liability.

    $$\text{Remaining Tax Liability} = \$15,000,000 – \$10,000,000 = \$5,000,000$$

    The remaining $5,000,000 liability may be offset by other applicable incentive credits (like the Education Credit) or federal-based credits.14
  • Carryforward: Since the calculated credit of $10M was fully utilized, there is no credit carried forward to the subsequent tax year.
  • Compliance Requirement: NSS must ensure the $100,000,000 QEA used to generate the credit is not simultaneously deducted when calculating Alaska corporate net income, and that these specific labor and supply costs were not claimed as QREs for purposes of generating a Federal-Based R&D credit on Form 6390.6

Table 3: QOGSIE Example Calculation Summary (NSS Corp, TY 2025)

Expenditure Category Cost Incurred ($) Qualifying Status Qualified Expenditure Amount (QEA) ($)
Direct Labor (In-state services) 70,000,000 Qualified 70,000,000
Qualified Supplies/Raw Materials 30,000,000 Qualified 30,000,000
Depreciable Equipment/Facilities 10,000,000 Non-Qualified 0
Total Qualified Expenditure (QEA) N/A N/A 100,000,000
Calculated Credit (10% of QEA) N/A N/A 10,000,000
Maximum Credit Claimed (Lesser of calculated credit or $10M cap) N/A N/A 10,000,000

VII. Strategic Considerations and Conclusion

A. Strategic Optimization and Risk Management

For large service providers, the primary strategic challenge involves navigating the $10 million annual cap in conjunction with the restrictive carryforward period. If a taxpayer generates significant QEA far exceeding the $100 million threshold required to hit the cap, the resulting multi-million dollar credit must be recovered within five years, a relatively short window that exposes the credit to expiration risk if the taxpayer’s future Alaska corporate income tax liability declines.

Successful optimization of the QOGSIE credit depends on rigorous internal accounting systems that can segment qualified costs with precision. The goal should be to maximize the defensible QEA toward the $100 million maximum threshold for generating the full $10 million credit, while rigorously excluding non-qualifying facility and process-related capital expenditures, as explicitly mandated by the DOR guidance.6

B. The Essential Choice: QOGSIE vs. Federal-Based R&D

Service companies engaged in both R&D (IRC § 41 activities) and direct manufacturing/modification (AS 43.20.049 activities) face a required election for any overlapping expenditures, due to the anti-double benefit rules.6 This strategic choice requires a comparative analysis of the benefits.

If a company anticipates consistently high Alaska corporate income tax liability, the QOGSIE credit offers a higher, direct credit rate (10% of expenditure) and a straightforward annual offset up to $10 million. Conversely, if a company anticipates periods of low profitability or high volatility in its Alaska tax base, the Federal-Based R&D Credit, while potentially providing a lower effective state rate, offers the crucial benefit of a 20-year carryforward.13 The longevity of the R&D carryforward mitigates the risk of credit expiration, which is a major factor under QOGSIE’s strict five-year limit.

Table 1: Comparison of Alaska Service Industry and R&D Tax Credits

Feature QOGSIE Credit (AS 43.20.049) Federal-Based R&D Credit (AS 43.20.021)
Statutory Basis AS 43.20.049 (Incentive Credit) 1 AS 43.20.021 (Federal-Based Credit) 9
Primary Purpose Incentivize in-state manufacture/modification of tangible property for O&G 1 Incentivize general qualified research activities (IRC § 41 QREs) 9
Location Requirement Expenditures MUST be incurred in Alaska 6 Research activities qualify if performed within the U.S. 8
Credit Rate 10% of Qualified Expenditure 2 18% of Apportioned Federal Credit 9
Annual Cap on Claim $10,000,000 (Hard Cap) 3 Limited by federal credit base and apportionment factor 9
Carryforward Period 5 years 6 20 years 13
Required Alaska Form(s) Claimed on Form 6300 (Incentive Credits) 14 Claimed on Form 6390 (Federal-based Credits) 9

C. Conclusion

The Alaska Qualified Oil and Gas Service Industry Expenditure (QOGSIE) credit, established under AS 43.20.049, represents a valuable but highly specific non-refundable incentive for service providers crucial to the state’s energy infrastructure. It is designed to foster localized economic activity by offering a 10% tax offset on in-state expenditures for the creation or modification of long-lived tangible personal property used in oil and gas operations.

Compliance with the QOGSIE statute demands meticulous attention to detail, particularly the separation of qualifying direct costs (labor and integrated supplies) from non-qualifying indirect costs (facilities and capital equipment used in the manufacturing process). The most significant compliance challenge remains the anti-double benefit rule, which necessitates a strategic election between the QOGSIE credit and the Federal-Based R&D Credit for overlapping costs. Given the credit’s short five-year carryforward period, effective utilization of QOGSIE requires sophisticated financial planning and stable tax liability within Alaska to maximize the annual $10 million benefit and avoid credit expiration.

Are you eligible?

R&D Tax Credit Eligibility AI Tool

Why choose us?

directive for LBI taxpayers

Pass an Audit?

directive for LBI taxpayers

What is the R&D Tax Credit?

The Research & Experimentation Tax Credit (or R&D Tax Credit), is a general business tax credit under Internal Revenue Code section 41 for companies that incur research and development (R&D) costs in the United States. The credits are a tax incentive for performing qualified research in the United States, resulting in a credit to a tax return. For the first three years of R&D claims, 6% of the total qualified research expenses (QRE) form the gross credit. In the 4th year of claims and beyond, a base amount is calculated, and an adjusted expense line is multiplied times 14%. Click here to learn more.

Never miss a deadline again

directive for LBI taxpayers

Stay up to date on IRS processes

Discover R&D in your industry

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/

Schedule a Teleconference

R&D Tax Credit Training for CPAs

directive for LBI taxpayers

Upcoming Webinars
Register Here

R&D Tax Credit Training for CFPs

bigstock Image of two young businessmen 521093561 300x200

Upcoming Webinars
Register Here

R&D Tax Credit Training for SMBs

water tech

Upcoming Webinars
Register Here

Choose your state

find-us-map