The "Specific Credits Basket" in Alaska R&D Tax Law
Core Definition
"The 'Specific Credits Basket' refers to the aggregate grouping of non-refundable Incentive Credits (Form 6300), including R&D, which are collectively limited to the taxpayer's net income tax liability, prohibiting refunds but allowing for carryforwards."
In the context of the Alaska Corporate Net Income Tax, strictly speaking, there is no statute labeled "Specific Credits Basket." However, tax professionals use this term to describe the **Incentive Credits category** (reported on Alaska Form 6300). This mechanism creates a "basket" where the Research and Development (R&D) credit competes with other incentive credits (like the Education Credit or Veteran Employment Credit).
The critical function of this basket is limitation. Unlike refundable credits (which result in a cash check if they exceed tax liability), credits in this specific basket can only reduce tax liability to zero. Any excess remains in the basket to be carried forward to future years, typically for up to seven years.
How the "Basket" Works
Explore the components that make up the Incentive Credits Basket and how they interact with Alaska State Law (AS 43.20.021).
Incentive Credits (Inputs)
These credits are calculated independently but pooled together.
- R&D Credit (AS 43.20.021(k))
- Education Credit
- Veteran Employment Credit
The "Basket" Limit
The aggregate total is compared against the Net Income Tax Liability.
Pay $0 Tax;
Excess = Carryforward;
}
Financial Impact
The actual benefit realized in the current fiscal year vs. deferred assets.
- Tax Reduction: Max 100% of Liability
- Refund Cash: $0.00
- Carryforward: 7 Years
Scenario Simulator
Adjust the values to see how the Specific Credits Basket limits the immediate benefit of R&D expenses.
Est. Tax Rate: 9.4% (simplified)
AK Credit is ~18% of this value.
Education, Film, etc.
Credit Utilization vs. Limitation
The "Used" portion cannot exceed Tax Liability.
Basket Composition
Proportion of R&D vs Other Credits.
Regulatory Guidance & Statutes
Direct references to the authority governing the "Specific Credits Basket."
AS 43.20.021(k)
Adopts Internal Revenue Code Section 41 (Federal R&D Credit) but applies an 18% rate to the eligible expenses allocated to Alaska. It establishes the R&D credit as an incentive credit subject to limitation.
Form 6300 Instructions
The "Incentive Credits" form. This is the physical manifestation of the "Basket." Line items list R&D, Education, etc. The total on this form is entered on Form 6000 (Line 7) but is limited to not reduce tax below zero.
Conclusion & Strategic Takeaway
The "Specific Credits Basket" in Alaska is a mechanism of fiscal prudence. While the state encourages innovation through the generous 18% R&D credit, the non-refundable nature of the basket means that tax planning is essential. Companies must project their tax liability accurately; otherwise, they accumulate carryforwards that lose value over time due to inflation, even if they don't expire for 7 years.
Maximize Usage
Ensure enough tax liability exists to absorb the credits within the 7-year carryforward window.
Review Apportionment
Higher sales in Alaska increase tax liability, potentially unlocking more R&D credits from the basket.
Monitor Changes
Legislative changes to AS 43.20.021 can alter the rate or the basket rules instantly.
The Specific Credits Basket in Alaska Corporate Tax Law: Statutory Analysis and Compliance of the Research and Development Tax Credit
Executive Summary: The Specific Credits Basket and Alaska R&D Tax Credit
The Specific Credits Basket (SCB) is the administrative and statutory framework governing the calculation and application of certain federally derived tax benefits against Alaska corporate income tax liability. This mechanism, primarily implemented through Alaska Form 6390, ensures that credits such as the federal Research and Development (R&D) tax credit are appropriately limited, ordered, and utilized according to state statute.
The Alaska R&D credit, specifically addressed under Alaska Statute (AS) 43.20.021(d), is strictly limited to 18% of the calculated federal R&D credit (IRC §41) and must be proportionally apportioned to Alaska using the state’s mandatory three-factor corporate income tax formula. The resulting credit is nonrefundable but provides a dollar-for-dollar offset against corporate tax liability and includes a highly valuable 20-year carryforward provision for unused amounts, signaling the state’s preference for encouraging long-term capital investment and sustained profitability.
Section I: Foundation and Statutory Interpretation: Alaska’s Federal Conformity (AS 43.20)
Alaska’s corporate income tax structure relies heavily on a policy of selective conformity with the Internal Revenue Code (IRC). This reliance is central to the operation of the “Specific Credits Basket” (SCB), which is the administrative grouping used to calculate and apply federal tax benefits, including the Research and Development (R&D) credit, against state tax liabilities.
1.1 Alaska’s Foundational Alignment with the Internal Revenue Code (IRC)
The legal foundation for the R&D credit resides in AS 43.20.021, which mandates the adoption of the core provisions of the IRC, specifically Sections 1–1399 and 6001–7872, maintaining their full force and effect unless explicitly modified by Alaska statute.1 This comprehensive conformity ensures that the detailed definitional framework of the federal R&D credit, codified under IRC §41, is automatically incorporated into Alaska state law.2
The state’s commitment to federal alignment extends to administrative application. AS 43.20.160 and AS 43.20.300 impose a requirement upon the Department of Revenue (DOR) to apply, “as far as practicable,” the existing administrative and judicial interpretations of federal income tax law.1 For R&D claims, this mandate is critical: the DOR relies on the rigorous federal substantiation standards for Qualified Research Expenses (QREs), including adherence to the four-part test for qualified research and the maintenance of detailed supporting documentation such as general ledger detail, payroll records, project notes, and formal communications regarding technological uncertainty.3 This policy choice significantly mitigates the complexity and cost of creating and enforcing separate state-specific R&D definitions and auditing procedures. By ensuring that the Alaska claim is wholly dependent on the validity of the federal claim, the state achieves significant regulatory efficiency. If the federal R&D claim fails due to insufficient substantiation or technical non-compliance with IRC §41, the corresponding Alaska SCB claim is automatically rendered invalid.
Despite the broad conformity, Alaska exercises strategic modifications. Specifically, the state excludes federal credits derived from activities within certain geographically defined incentive zones. Alaska explicitly states that it does not adopt IRC Sections 1400–1400U, which govern tax benefits for activities in areas like “Enterprise Zones” or “Gulf Opportunity Zones”.1 This statutory exception requires multi-state taxpayers who utilize these federal programs to recompute their federal-based credits for Alaska purposes, effectively stripping out these federally subsidized benefits before calculating the SCB amount. This demonstrates a clear policy of selective conformity, ensuring that Alaska only grants tax incentives for activities that are economically justifiable within the state’s own tax policy objectives and not merely subsidizing federal regional initiatives.1
1.2 Defining the “Specific Credits Basket” (SCB) Structure
The “Specific Credits Basket” (SCB) is not a credit itself, but rather the operational grouping used on Alaska Form 6390, “Alaska Federal-based Credits,” to manage the total pool of allowable federal-based tax credits.
1.2.1 SCB as an IRC §38 Analog
Form 6390 is explicitly designed to follow the established function of federal Form 3800, which is the mechanism used federally to calculate and limit the General Business Credit (GBC).1 The GBC, defined under IRC §38, is a composite of over 30 separate component tax credits, including the R&D credit (IRC §41), the Investment Credit, and the Work Opportunity Tax Credit.5 The SCB in Alaska fulfills the same purpose: aggregating these component credits, applying state-mandated limits, and ordering their application against the final corporate tax liability.1
The primary purpose of Form 6390 is to “order and limit federal-based credits, on an as-if Alaska basis”.1 The structure mandates that taxpayers consolidate current-year credits, carryforwards, and carrybacks within the various required baskets, including the SCB, before subjecting them to the state’s tax liability offset rules.5
1.2.2 Exclusions from the Specific Credits Basket
Although the SCB largely tracks the federal GBC, Alaska mandates specific exclusions. These credits, which are component parts of the GBC on Form 3800, are disallowed for Alaska purposes 1:
- Credits for Backup Withholding: These are excluded from the Alaska tax calculation.1
- Credit for Employer Social Security and Medicare Taxes Paid on Certain Employee Tips: This credit, often functioning as a type of tax reimbursement, is explicitly removed from the Alaska SCB.1
- Other Tax Reimbursement Credits: Generally, any federal credits that function specifically as a tax reimbursement or refund are excluded from the SCB.1
- Investment Tax Credit (Conditional): Alaska only allows the federal Investment Tax Credit to the extent that it is “attributable to Alaska property”.1
The systematic exclusion of federal credits that function as tax reimbursements or that lack a strong, direct link to Alaska assets (such as the partial disallowance of the Investment Tax Credit for non-Alaska property) demonstrates a policy goal of ensuring the state tax benefit is reserved for activities that bolster the local economy and tax base, rather than simply participating in federal revenue-sharing mechanisms.1
Section II: The Alaska Research and Development Tax Credit (AS 43.20.021(d))
The Alaska R&D tax credit is the most frequently claimed component within the Specific Credits Basket for many large corporations. Its structure is defined by a high statutory rate coupled with a mandatory apportionment rule, focusing the benefit on the economic reality of the taxpayer’s presence in the state.
2.1 Qualification Criteria and Federal R&D Alignment
Eligibility for the Alaska credit is non-negotiable: a business must first qualify for the federal R&D credit under IRC §41.4 This reliance ensures technical rigor, as the definition of qualified activities and expenses remains the same at both the federal and state levels.2
2.1.1 Mandatory Eligibility and QRE Definition
Qualified research expenses (QREs) must satisfy the four-part test required by the IRC §41 regulations: the activity must be intended to discover information that eliminates technical uncertainty concerning the development or improvement of a product; it must involve a process of experimentation, including testing, modeling, or systematic trial and error; and the purpose must be to improve the functionality, performance, reliability, or quality of a new or existing business component.4
QREs that form the basis of the federal credit and are adopted by Alaska include 3:
- Wages: Salaries paid for employees who are directly performing, supervising, or supporting qualified research activities.
- Supplies: Costs of materials and prototypes consumed during the research process, explicitly excluding land or buildings.
- Contract Research: 65% of amounts paid to unrelated third parties for qualified services, or 75% for payments made to qualified research consortia.
- Computer Rentals: Costs for leased computer equipment used directly in the research.
2.1.2 Geographic Scope and Policy Linkage
The Alaska R&D credit allows taxpayers to include QREs for qualified activities performed anywhere within the United States.2 This broad geographic scope is strategically designed to support multi-state operations, particularly large resource-intensive industries like oil and gas exploration, technology, and manufacturing.3 The state’s policy decision to allow U.S.-wide QREs is directly tied to the subsequent mandatory apportionment rule.
By allowing QREs generated outside the state, Alaska incentivizes all R&D that ultimately results in commercialized technology or intellectual property used within Alaskan operations. The economic benefit is then secured for the state through the apportionment formula, which precisely measures the proportion of the R&D output that is consumed or realized through the Alaska tax base (i.e., local property, payroll, and sales).3
2.2 Statutory Limitation: The 18% Rule and Apportionment
The mechanism for generating the final allowable Alaska R&D credit is dictated by AS 43.20.021(d), which imposes two numerical constraints: the apportionment rule and the 18% limitation.
2.2.1 The High Effective Rate
The statute limits the Alaska credit to 18% of the apportioned federal credit amount.3 This 18% rate, considered high among state R&D incentives 3, is structured to provide a significant, deep tax discount per dollar of research. This high rate is a deliberate compensatory mechanism, designed to ensure the credit remains highly valuable for profitable, long-term enterprises despite the credit being strictly nonrefundable.3 This structure is particularly rewarding for scaled operations within the energy sector, which often have both high QREs and substantial corporate income tax liabilities.3
2.2.2 Mandatory Three-Factor Apportionment
The calculated total federal R&D credit serves as the global base which must be reduced by the Alaska apportionment factor. This factor must be the same three-factor formula—based on property, payroll, and sales—that the corporation uses to calculate its overall Alaska corporate income tax apportionment.3
The practical implementation involves:
- Calculating the total federal credit (Form 6765).
- Multiplying the federal credit by the calculated Alaska apportionment factor (ratio of Alaska property, payroll, and sales to total U.S. property, payroll, and sales).3
- Applying the 18% statutory rate to the resulting apportioned credit base.3
This linkage ensures that the tax benefit is accurately and directly correlated to the economic activity carried out within Alaska’s borders. If a multi-state firm, for example, has minimal Alaskan payroll or property, its apportionment factor will be low, resulting in a proportional reduction of the available state credit, regardless of the size of the total federal credit claimed.3 This use of apportionment serves as a robust regulatory filter, ensuring that the state only subsidizes the research that generates proportionate local economic value.
2.3 Utilization and Carryover Provisions
The R&D credit, once calculated and placed in the SCB, provides a dollar-for-dollar offset against Alaska corporate income tax liabilities.3 It is available to C-Corporations, S-Corporations, Partnerships, and LLCs, with flow-through entities passing the credit through to their corporate owners.3
A significant feature supporting long-term investment is the carryover provision. Any unused portion of the calculated credit is not forfeited; it may be carried back for one year and carried forward for up to 20 years.2 This extensive carryforward period is designed specifically for capital-intensive industries. It allows businesses that incur substantial R&D expenses early in a project cycle—when income tax liability may be low or non-existent due to losses—to monetize the credit years later when the project achieves sustained profitability and generates large tax liabilities.3
Section III: DOR Guidance on Compliance, Ordering, and Utilization (Form 6390)
The operational management of the Specific Credits Basket is centralized within Alaska Form 6390, “Alaska Federal-based Credits.” This form dictates the final application of the R&D credit against the state tax liability, enforcing both the limitations and the required hierarchy of credit utilization.
3.1 Mandate and Structure of Alaska Form 6390
Form 6390 is a mandatory attachment to the Alaska corporate income tax return (Form 6000, 6100, or 6150) whenever federal-based credits are claimed.1 Its purpose is explicitly stated: to “order and limit federal-based credits, on an as-if Alaska basis”.1 The form consolidates all eligible federal-based credits, including the R&D credit, into the required baskets (such as the SCB), calculating the total available offset after applying the 18% limitation.7
The function of Form 6390 closely mimics the grouping and limiting process of federal Form 3800, which accounts for the various component credits and manages carryforwards.1 By adopting this familiar structure, the DOR streamlines compliance for multi-state firms already accustomed to the federal GBC ordering rules.
3.2 Credit Utilization and Ordering Rules
The R&D credit within the SCB is strictly nonrefundable, meaning it is utilized as a direct, dollar-for-dollar offset against tax liabilities, and any excess does not result in a cash payment from the state.3
3.2.1 Priority of Alaska Incentive Credits
The utilization of the SCB credit is subject to a strict hierarchy, particularly when the taxpayer also has liability under the Alaska Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT). DOR regulations establish a clear priority: federal-based credits (the SCB components) may only offset Alaska AMT after all specific Alaska incentive credits, such as the special industrial incentive tax credit under AS 43.20.042, have been applied.2
This ordering rule is a powerful tool for protecting the state’s tax base and ensuring that its own policy initiatives take fiscal precedence. By mandating the front-loading of state-legislated incentives, Alaska ensures that those specific programs achieve their full intended economic benefit before the secondary, federally derived benefits (the SCB) are brought into play. This mechanism prevents the SCB credits from disproportionately reducing the tax base and crowding out the effect of locally targeted subsidies.2
3.2.2 Proportional Allocation of Offset (AMT and Regular Tax)
The final application of the total allowable SCB credit is limited to the remaining net corporate income tax liability (Regular Tax plus AMT).3 Furthermore, Form 6390 mandates a proportional allocation of the allowable credit against the remaining Regular Tax and AMT liabilities. This complex calculation determines the precise amount of the SCB credit applied to offset each remaining tax regime.7
The methodology requires taxpayers to determine the ratio of the remaining Regular Tax to the total remaining liability, and the ratio of the remaining AMT to the total remaining liability, after the application of all prior credits. These ratios are then applied to the total allowable SCB credit amount. This process ensures that the R&D credit reduces both the Regular Tax and the AMT proportionately. Specific lines on Form 6390 (or related calculation worksheets) are dedicated to this allocation: the regular tax offset is calculated using a multiplier derived from this proportion (e.g., Line 9 on the worksheet), and the AMT offset is calculated similarly (e.g., Line 10 on the worksheet).7 Precision in this proportional calculation is mandatory, as errors can lead to non-compliant credit utilization and miscalculation of carryforward amounts.
3.3 Carryback and Carryforward Provisions
As previously noted, the carryover period is generous: unused federal-based credits (including the R&D credit in the SCB) can be carried back for one year and carried forward for up to 20 years.2 This stability is particularly important for large-scale, long-term projects characteristic of Alaska’s major industries.
The only scenario where a portion of the credit might be potentially refunded is if the credit were derived from certain exploration incentives that historically could be “cashed out” with the State under AS 43.55.028.9 However, the R&D credit under AS 43.20 is not such a mechanism. Thus, for the R&D component of the SCB, the 20-year carryforward is the sole method for monetizing any unused credit balance, making accurate long-term tax modeling essential for realizing the full economic benefit.3
Section IV: Comparative Analysis and Policy Implications
Understanding the Specific Credits Basket requires placing it in context with Alaska’s previous history of resource tax incentives, particularly the highly fluid oil and gas credits. This contrast highlights a significant policy shift toward conventional, stable economic development tools.
4.1 Distinction from Refundable Oil and Gas Credits (AS 43.55)
The R&D credit (AS 43.20), as part of the nonrefundable SCB, operates under a fundamentally different policy philosophy than the legacy oil and gas credits defined under AS 43.55.
4.1.1 Liquidity and Risk Mitigation
Legacy credits were often designed to provide immediate liquidity and offset substantial financial risk during oil and gas exploration and production. For example, the loss carryforward credit under AS 43.55.023(b) allowed companies to carry forward up to 35% of their North Slope loss against future liability.10 Crucially, many of these AS 43.55 credits were 9:
- Refundable: They allowed for “cash purchase” by the state through credit certificates, injecting cash directly into qualifying companies, though eligibility was often restricted (e.g., production under 50,000 BOE per day).9
- Transferable: Credit certificates could be transferred (sold) to other entities.9
In contrast, the R&D credit in the SCB is explicitly nonrefundable and designed only to offset an existing tax liability.3 It does not act as a liquidity injection mechanism.
4.1.2 Minimum Tax Reduction
Furthermore, certain AS 43.55 credits could reduce the tax liability below the statutory minimum tax (AS 43.55.011(f)) during annual tax calculations.10 The R&D credit, constrained by the general principles of the federal GBC structure adopted by the DOR, is limited to the total computed corporate tax liability and cannot typically breach the minimum tax floor to generate a cash benefit.3
4.2 Policy Bifurcation: From Crisis Intervention to Stable Incentivization
The expiration and repeal of many high-cost, high-liquidity programs, such as certain refundable North Slope Qualified Capital Expenditure (QCE) credits 9, underscore a structural shift in Alaska’s fiscal approach.
- Shift to Stability: The current tax environment favors the stable, conventional incentive model represented by the R&D credit SCB. This policy rewards realized profitability over immediate capital attraction. The non-refundability minimizes immediate budgetary risk for the state, while the 20-year carryforward accommodates the high capital intensity and long timelines of Alaskan projects without resorting to direct cash subsidies.3
- Incentive Targeting: The R&D credit is broadly available to various sectors (technology, manufacturing, energy) based on the highly objective metric of research investment.3 This contrasts with the highly targeted, sector-specific risk mitigation approach of the legacy oil and gas credits. The SCB R&D credit represents a general economic development strategy focused on innovation across the corporate tax base.
Section V: Comprehensive Example of Specific Credits Basket Application
This example demonstrates the mandatory calculation, limitation, and proportional ordering of the Alaska R&D credit as it operates within the Specific Credits Basket (SCB), utilizing the prescribed statutory rate, apportionment factor, and ordering rules.
5.1 Scenario Setup: Aurora Tech Corp (ATC)
ATC is a multi-state C-Corporation. The following data forms the basis of the calculation for the current tax year:
Table: Aurora Tech Corp Financial and Apportionment Data
| Metric | Value | Basis/Statute |
| Total U.S. QREs | $5,000,000 | IRC §41 |
| Federal R&D Credit Calculated (IRC §41) | $800,000 | Federal Form 6765 |
| Alaska Property Factor | 25.0% | AS 43.20.071 |
| Alaska Payroll Factor | 15.0% | AS 43.20.071 |
| Alaska Sales Factor | 20.0% | AS 43.20.071 |
| Alaska Regular Tax Liability (Pre-SCB) | $150,000 | Corporate Return (Form 6000/6100) |
| Alaska AMT Liability (Pre-SCB) | $40,000 | Schedule E |
| Alaska Incentive Credits Applied First | $50,000 | AS 43.20.042 (Prioritized) |
First, the mandatory Alaska Apportionment Factor must be computed using the average of the three factors 3:
$$\text{Alaska Apportionment Factor} = \frac{25.0\% + 15.0\% + 20.0\%}{3} = \frac{60.0\%}{3} = 20.0\%$$
5.2 Step-by-Step SCB Calculation and Application
5.2.1 Calculation of the Alaska R&D Credit Amount (SCB Component)
The credit amount must be calculated using the two-step statutory limitation outlined in AS 43.20.021(d).7
- Federal Credit Apportioned to Alaska (Credit Base):
$\$800,000 (\text{Federal Credit}) \times 20.0\% (\text{Apportionment Factor}) = \$160,000$ - Total Alaska R&D Credit (18% Limit):
$\$160,000 (\text{Apportioned Base}) \times 18\% (\text{Statutory Rate}) = \$28,800 \text{ [3]}$
The maximum calculated R&D credit available to ATC for the current year is $28,800.
5.2.2 Calculation of Tax Liability Available for SCB Offset
The calculated credit is tested against the remaining liability after applying all prioritized state incentive credits.2
- Total Alaska Tax Liability (Pre-SCB):
$\$150,000 (\text{Regular Tax}) + \$40,000 (\text{AMT}) = \$190,000$ - Remaining Tax Liability After Incentive Credits:
The $\$50,000$ in Alaska Incentive Credits is applied first, assumed fully utilized against the Regular Tax Liability.
$\$190,000 (\text{Total Liability}) – \$50,000 (\text{Incentive Credits}) = \$140,000$ - Allowable R&D Credit Applied:
The allowable credit is the lesser of the calculated SCB credit ($28,800) or the Remaining Tax Liability ($140,000).
Lesser amount: $28,800.
In this scenario, the full calculated credit of $28,800 is used in the current year. There is no unused credit to carry forward.3
5.3 Proportional Offset Calculation (Form 6390 Ordering)
The utilized SCB credit ($28,800) must be proportionally allocated against the remaining Regular Tax and AMT components of the liability.7
The liabilities remaining immediately prior to the SCB application are:
- Remaining Regular Tax Liability: $\$150,000 – \$50,000 = \$100,000$
- Remaining AMT Liability: $\$40,000$
- Total Base for SCB Offset: $\$140,000$
The proportional allocation calculation, simulating the process on Form 6390 worksheets, is as follows:
Table: Proportional Allocation of SCB R&D Credit
| Tax Base | Remaining Liability | Proportion | Applied R&D Credit ($28,800) | Form 6390 Allocation |
| Regular Tax | $100,000 | $\frac{100,000}{140,000} \approx 71.43\%$ | $\$28,800 \times 0.7143 = \$20,579$ | Line 9 (Offset Regular Tax) 7 |
| AMT | $40,000$ | $\frac{40,000}{140,000} \approx 28.57\%$ | $\$28,800 \times 0.2857 = \$8,221$ | Line 10 (Offset AMT) 7 |
| Total | $140,000 | 100% | $28,800 | Total SCB Applied |
This mandatory proportional application ensures that the benefit is distributed across both tax liabilities, reinforcing the state’s requirement that federal-based credits offset both the regular tax and AMT regimes as dictated by the complexity embedded within Form 6390.7
Section VI: Conclusion and Summary of Best Practices
The Alaska Specific Credits Basket (SCB) successfully integrates the complex federal R&D tax credit structure into a controlled state mechanism that prioritizes Alaskan economic connection and fiscal stability. The framework, defined by the 18% rate, the mandatory three-factor apportionment, and strict credit ordering on Form 6390, is designed for experienced multi-state tax practitioners.
6.1 Key Conclusions and Strategic Implications
- Regulatory Leverage: Alaska utilizes deep federal conformity (AS 43.20.021) to minimize state administrative burden by leveraging the compliance and audit requirements of IRC §41. This strategy forces taxpayers to ensure federal documentation, such as Form 6765 and related QRE substantiation, is impeccable before attempting the state claim.3
- Strategic Apportionment: The R&D credit’s apportionment requirement serves as the state’s primary economic gatekeeper. By tying the credit calculation to the same three-factor formula (property, payroll, sales) used for corporate income tax, the benefit is guaranteed to be proportionate to the physical and commercial presence within Alaska, making the credit highly valuable for multi-state firms with significant Alaskan operational bases.3
- Fiscal Discipline through Ordering: The DOR maintains fiscal control by enforcing credit ordering rules via Form 6390, specifically prioritizing Alaska incentive credits over federal-based SCB components when calculating the AMT offset.2 Furthermore, the nonrefundable nature and proportional offset requirements ensure that the R&D credit acts strictly as an income tax reduction tool and does not impact immediate state cash flow through refunds, distinguishing it sharply from legacy, high-liquidity resource incentives.3
6.2 Best Practices for Multi-State Claimants
For tax counsel and directors managing corporate tax compliance in Alaska, adherence to technical details is paramount for maximizing the value of the SCB R&D credit:
- Integrated Compliance Review: The foundation of the Alaska claim rests on the federal filing. A comprehensive review should ensure that all QREs meet the IRC §41 four-part test and that the documentation—including payroll details, vendor invoices, and research journals—is retained for the full carryforward period (up to 20 years plus statute of limitations).3
- Precise Factor Calculation: Tax departments must dedicate resources to accurately calculating the three-factor apportionment ratio (AS 43.20.071), as this factor directly determines the 18% credit base.3 Any slight error in calculating property, payroll, or sales factors can disproportionately affect the final allowable credit amount.
- Form 6390 Proportional Modeling: Due to the complexity of the ordering rules involving AMT and prior state incentive credits, detailed modeling of Form 6390 is essential. Taxpayers must verify that the proportional offset of the SCB credit between Regular Tax and AMT is correctly executed, preventing potential disallowance or misstated carryforwards.7
Long-Term Carryover Planning: Given the nonrefundable status and the extensive 20-year carryforward period, the R&D credit should be actively incorporated into long-term financial forecasts. This ensures that the unused credit balance is tracked and applied against future projected corporate income tax liabilities, securing the full economic benefit intended by the legislature.3
Are you eligible?
Why choose us?
Pass an Audit?
What is the R&D Tax Credit?
The Research & Experimentation Tax Credit (or R&D Tax Credit), is a general business tax credit under Internal Revenue Code section 41 for companies that incur research and development (R&D) costs in the United States. The credits are a tax incentive for performing qualified research in the United States, resulting in a credit to a tax return. For the first three years of R&D claims, 6% of the total qualified research expenses (QRE) form the gross credit. In the 4th year of claims and beyond, a base amount is calculated, and an adjusted expense line is multiplied times 14%. Click here to learn more.
Never miss a deadline again
Stay up to date on IRS processes
Discover R&D in your industry
R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services
Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.
If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.
R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services
creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.
Our Fees
Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/
Choose your state
