Alaska R&D Tax Credit
Transferability & Compliance Analysis
Core Definition
A "Transferable" credit allows companies with no tax liability to sell their R&D credits to other taxpayers for cash, creating immediate liquidity.
Credit Rate
Based on IRC § 41 definition
Market Value
Typical secondary market range
The Transfer Mechanism
Understanding the workflow is critical for compliance. The Alaska R&D credit is unique because it decouples the *generation* of the credit from the *utilization* of the credit. Click the steps below to explore the guidance for each stage.
Transfer Valuation Calculator
Calculate the gross credit and the net cash realizable through a transfer. This tool helps CFOs determine if the administrative burden of filing is outweighed by the liquidity event.
*Typical market discounts range from 8% to 15% depending on credit size and seller reputation.
Value Retention Analysis
Buyer vs. Seller Economics
Why the secondary market exists.
Regulatory Framework
Monetizing Innovation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Transferable Tax Credits and the Alaska R&D Program
I. Executive Summary: The Mechanism of Transferable Tax Credits
Transferable tax credits are a specialized financial instrument allowing companies that generate tax benefits but cannot immediately use them (the sellers) to sell those benefits for cash to unrelated taxpayers (the buyers). This mechanism accelerates investment by bridging the gap between credit generation and internal tax liability, converting a deferred tax asset into immediate working capital.
This system represents a transformative mechanism designed to accelerate investments, particularly in critical sectors like US energy and manufacturing.1 For developers and manufacturers, transferability provides notable advantages, most significantly by streamlining the monetization process for sellers while offering buyers a means of reducing their tax liability at a discount.1
The Strategic Significance of Transferability
The ability to transfer tax credits freely creates a robust private market that serves as an alternative to traditional government grants or direct refunds that require the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to arbitrate the provenance of a credit.2 This private market dynamic catalyzes significant investments, fostering diverse energy infrastructure and secure supply chains.2
Critically, transferability broadens access to capital, benefiting mid-size project developers, manufacturers, and miners who traditionally lacked the necessary scale or structure to engage in complex tax equity investments.2 This mechanism constitutes a fundamental strategic shift in how government incentives function, decentralizing monetization away from restrictive tax equity structures toward a more efficient, market-driven process. For Alaska, where capital liquidity is essential across resource-dependent industries, this market efficiency is a potent tool for economic development.
II. The Foundational Framework of Tax Credit Transferability
A. Defining the Transferable Tax Credit Landscape
The transferable tax credit ecosystem fundamentally involves the credit generator (the seller), the taxpayer seeking a tax offset (the buyer), and various intermediaries. The underlying transaction involves the sale of the right to claim a tax credit. This transfer is formalized via a contractual agreement, typically a Purchase and Sale Agreement (PSA).4
A key legal distinction of transferability is that the corporate buyer acquires only the rights to the tax credit, without needing to assume ownership of the underlying R&D or energy assets that generated the credit.4 This structure minimizes the buyer’s operational and project-level risk exposure.
While corporations are the primary participants, transferable credits may be purchased by individuals. However, individual buyers are typically subject to active and passive activity restrictions, meaning the face value of the transferred credit can usually only be utilized to offset tax liabilities derived from passive, non-investment income.2
B. Distinguishing Transferability from Other Mechanisms
Transferability distinguishes itself from traditional financing mechanisms, most notably complex tax equity structures.3 Prior to the advent of broad transferability, clean energy tax credits required the taxpayer utilizing the credit to own the underlying generating project, leading to complex and expensive partnership structures usually accessible only to large financial institutions.3 Transferability eliminates this barrier, fostering a more accessible market.3
For the seller, transferability ensures the immediate cash realization of the credit, irrespective of the company’s current profitability or immediate tax appetite.5 This is a significant advantage over traditional non-refundable credits, which only yield value if the company possesses sufficient tax liability or must rely on potentially lengthy 20-year carryforward provisions.6
It is important to note a critical procedural difference: in the federal context (e.g., under IRC Section 6418), a credit may be sold only once, though a buyer (such as a partnership) may allocate the purchased credit among its partners without violating the resale rule.7 As detailed in Section IV, Alaska’s statute for transferable certificates provides a more flexible arrangement regarding subsequent transfers.
III. The Alaska R&D Tax Credit: Calculation and Eligibility
A. Alaska’s Nexus to the Federal R&D Credit (IRC § 41)
The Alaska R&D tax credit is not a unique, state-defined credit based on state-specific qualified research expenditures (QREs); rather, it is directly derived from a company’s federal-based credits.6 This design links the state benefit directly to federal eligibility criteria.
The 18% Limitation
The Alaska credit is explicitly limited to 18% of the amount of the calculated federal R&D credit (under IRC § 41) that is specifically attributable or apportioned to Alaska.6 This percentage multiplier simplifies the calculation but ties the potential state benefit to changes in federal tax law.10
The definition of qualified research expenses and the activities that qualify for the Alaska credit are identical to the federal definition established under IRC § 41.6 To qualify, the research must meet the four-part test: the activity must have a Qualified Purpose (creating a new product or improving an existing one), require the Elimination of Uncertainty (having a plan to address unknowns), involve a Process of Experimentation (trying alternatives), and be Technological in Nature (based on hard sciences like engineering, chemistry, or computer science).10
Geographic Scope
A significant policy feature is that qualified activities need not be conducted physically within Alaska to be eligible for the state credit, provided they are conducted within the United States.6 This approach is intentional, making the credit highly attractive to large multi-state corporations, particularly those in resource sectors like oil, gas, and manufacturing. By basing the credit on a company’s Alaska tax nexus (apportionment) rather than a mandate for local R&D employment, the state ensures it rewards entities that contribute substantially to the state’s corporate tax base, even if their research headquarters are located elsewhere.
B. Apportionment and Utilization Rules
For taxpayers with taxable presence both inside and outside of Alaska, the federal credit generated must first be apportioned to Alaska sources.8 Only the apportioned portion of the federal credit is then subject to the 18% limitation to calculate the state credit.8
The Alaska R&D credit provides a dollar-for-dollar offset against Alaska corporate net income tax liabilities.6 Generally, however, credits attributable to Alaska may not be applied against the Alaska alternative minimum tax (AMT) or other state taxes.8 Federal-based credits are permitted to offset the Alaska AMT, but only after specific Alaska incentive credits have been applied.6
Unused federal-based credits, including the portion generating the Alaska R&D credit, are afforded a favorable carry period, allowing them to be carried back one year and carried forward for up to 20 years.6 This long carryforward period provides intrinsic value to the credit even if immediate transfer is not pursued.
| Component | Federal (IRC § 41) | Alaska State Credit |
| Base Rate | Determined by Federal Calculation Method | 18% of Federal Credit Apportioned to Alaska 9 |
| Qualified Activities Definition | Must meet the 4-Part Test (IRC § 41) | Same as Federal Definition 6 |
| Geographic Scope | Research must be conducted within the United States | Need not be conducted in Alaska, but must be in US 6 |
| Statutory Reference | IRC § 41, IRC § 38 (Federal-Based Credits) | AS 43.55.023, 15 AAC 20.145 6 |
IV. Alaska Department of Revenue (DOR) Guidance and Compliance for Transfer
A. Statutory Mandate for Credit Transferability (AS 43.55.023)
Alaska Statute AS 43.55.023 provides the legal foundation for transferability. Specifically, subsection (d) stipulates that a person entitled to the tax credit who wishes to transfer the unused credit to another party must apply to the Department of Revenue (DOR) for a transferable tax credit certificate.11
A key feature of the Alaska mechanism, distinguishing it from several federal transfer programs, is the treatment of the certificate post-transfer. The statute provides that a certificate issued by the DOR does not expire.12 Furthermore, the recipient of the certificate—the initial buyer—is explicitly authorized to transfer the certificate again to “another person”.12 This allowance for subsequent transferability potentially enhances the liquidity and market value of the Alaska credit compared to federal credits that are often limited to being “sold only once”.7
B. The Transferable Tax Credit Certificate Application Process
The application for a transferable tax credit certificate must be submitted in a specific form prescribed by the Department of Revenue.11 To administer the statute effectively, the DOR is charged with adopting necessary regulations.13
The application package must include comprehensive supporting information and documentation that the department reasonably requires to validate the claim.13 This documentation includes the original credit calculations and the underlying evidence that qualified research expenses meet the IRC § 41 standards.10
Review Timeline
A crucial administrative provision ensures timeliness in the monetization process. The DOR is statutorily required to grant or deny the tax credit certificate—or grant it for a reduced amount—not later than 120 days after receiving the complete application.13 This strict statutory timeline provides certainty for both sellers seeking immediate cash and buyers conducting due diligence, demanding that parties integrate this four-month review period into their transaction closing schedule.
C. Filing and Certification Procedures
Initial Claiming Requirement
The first step for any company seeking to monetize the credit is claiming it on their annual tax return. The taxpayer must file Alaska Form 6390 – Alaska Federal-based Credits and attach it to their state corporate income tax return (Form 6000 or 6100).6 This process establishes the legal validity and available balance of the credit before the transfer application can be submitted.
Transfer Documentation and Confidentiality
When executing the transfer, specific documentation is required beyond the DOR-prescribed application form. Although the exact R&D transfer form is not detailed in current guidance, historical DOR requirements for similar tax credit transfers—such as the Waiver of Confidentiality for Oil and Gas Production Tax Credit Certificates (Form 0405-315)—indicate the necessary compliance elements.15
Required information typically includes the full identifying details (name, mailing address, Federal EIN) for both the seller/transferor and the purchaser/transferee.15 Furthermore, the application must detail the specific transfer, including the date of transfer, the nature of the transfer (sale, exchange, etc.), and a signed copy of the transfer document (PSA).15 The form must clearly delineate the amount of tax credit transferred and any amount retained by the seller.15
A pivotal element required for transfer is the signed Waiver of Confidentiality.15 This waiver authorizes the Department of Revenue to disclose information to or request information from the buyer regarding the credit under AS 43.05.230(a).15 This requirement is the DOR’s mechanism for risk mitigation. Because tax credits can be audited years after they are claimed, the DOR must validate the underlying R&D claim against the ultimate taxpayer (the buyer) if the original generator (the seller) is unavailable. By mandating this waiver, the DOR ensures both the buyer and seller are mutually accountable for the credit’s substantiation, providing the buyer with crucial leverage during due diligence to insist on high-quality R&D documentation.
| Action | Purpose | Required Form/Statute | Key Requirement |
| Initial Credit Claim | Annual calculation and application of credit | Alaska Form 6390 (Alaska Federal-based Credits) 14 | Must attach to corporate income tax return; establishes the credit amount eligible for transfer. |
| Transfer Certificate Application | Certifying unused credit eligibility for transfer | Application form prescribed by DOR (AS 43.55.023(d)) 13 | DOR review period up to 120 days; includes supporting information. |
| Executing Transfer Documentation | Formalizing transfer and ensuring DOR communication | Transfer Document (PSA) and Waiver of Confidentiality (AS 43.05.230(a)) 15 | Documents transferred amount and ensures the DOR can audit the underlying claim against the buyer. |
V. Financial and Legal Mechanics of the Transfer Transaction
A. The Transfer Contract: Key Elements of the Purchase and Sale Agreement (PSA)
The Purchase and Sale Agreement (PSA) is the foundational legal document governing the transfer. The transfer process is structurally simplified, leading to minimal accounting complexity compared to traditional tax equity financing.4
The PSA must contain robust representations and warranties from the seller, guaranteeing that the underlying research meets the stringent qualification standards of IRC § 41. To protect the buyer, the PSA requires explicit indemnification clauses, obligating the seller to compensate the buyer if the credit is later disallowed, reduced, or recaptured due to flaws in the original R&D substantiation. This legal assurance, coupled with the regulatory requirement for the confidentiality waiver, manages the buyer’s audit exposure effectively.
B. The Economics of Transfer: Pricing, Discounting, and Secondary Market Dynamics
Tax credits are typically sold at a discount to their face value. This discounted price is necessary to attract buyers and is influenced by several factors: the perceived audit risk associated with the seller’s R&D documentation, the vintage (tax year) of the credit, and the current liquidity of the market. Since the Alaska certificate is re-transferable 12, this characteristic may slightly reduce the necessary discount compared to a non-transferable asset, enhancing the seller’s proceeds.
From the seller’s perspective, the decision to transfer is often driven by immediate capital needs; the value of immediate cash flow ($X) outweighs the future value of utilizing the full credit amount ($X + Discount) over a potential 20-year carryforward period.6 For the buyer, the discount generates immediate cash tax savings, allowing them to acquire a dollar-for-dollar offset (e.g., $1.00 of credit) for less than face value (e.g., $0.90 of cash).4
C. Tax Implications for the Transferor and Transferee
Utilization Timing: The timing of utilization is a critical element for the buyer’s tax planning. A buyer is permitted to utilize the purchased tax credit in the first taxable year that ends with, or after, the seller’s taxable year in which the credit was initially determined.7 Furthermore, the buyer may incorporate the anticipated purchase of a tax credit when calculating and remitting its estimated tax payments.7
Seller Proceeds: While the sale of federal clean energy credits under the Inflation Reduction Act often results in tax-exempt cash proceeds, the tax treatment of state credit sale proceeds must be carefully assessed under Alaska law to confirm the seller’s net benefit after the transaction.
VI. Practical Application: Detailed Case Study Example
A. Scenario: Calculating Cumulative R&D Credits for an Alaska Manufacturer
Consider a manufacturing company based in Anchorage that specializes in designing and producing specialized components for the local oil and gas sector. The company’s engineering activities satisfy the four-part test for qualified research under IRC § 41. Over a four-year period (2018–2021), the company established the following qualified research expenses (QREs) and federal credit amounts 8:
Table 3: Alaska R&D Tax Credit Calculation Case Study Example (2018-2021)
| Year | Total Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) | Calculated Federal Credit (IRC § 41) | Alaska State Credit (18% of Federal) |
| 2018 | $450,000 | $45,000 | $8,100 |
| 2019 | $650,000 | $65,000 | $11,700 |
| 2020 | $900,000 | $90,000 | $16,200 |
| 2021 | $1,300,000 | $130,000 | $23,400 |
| Total | $3,300,000 | $330,000 | $59,400 |
The company successfully claimed a total Federal R&D Credit of $330,000. Applying the Alaska statutory limitation of 18% to the federal credit attributable to the state yields an Alaska State R&D Credit of $59,400 ($330,000 $\times$ 0.18).8
B. Step-by-Step Monetization Modeling (Transfer Scenario)
- Utilization Status: The manufacturing company, focused on expansion, determines it lacks sufficient current or near-term Alaska corporate income tax liability to utilize the $59,400 credit internally, making the 20-year carryforward less valuable than immediate cash.
- DOR Application: The company files Alaska Form 6390 with its state return and subsequently applies to the DOR for a transferable tax credit certificate for the unused $59,400 balance, providing all supporting R&D documentation.
- DOR Certification: After the statutorily mandated 120-day review period, the DOR validates the claim and grants the $59,400 transferable tax credit certificate.
- Market Transaction: The company enters into a PSA to sell the certificate to a large Alaska resource corporation with substantial annual corporate income tax liability in the state.
- Valuation: Assuming the market dictates a 10% discount due to the low perceived risk profile of a government-certified credit, the certificate is sold at 90% of its face value:
| Calculation | Amount |
| Face Value of Credit | $59,400 |
| Transfer Price (90% of Face Value) | $53,460 |
| Net Discount to Buyer | $5,940 |
| Immediate Cash Injection to Seller | $53,460 |
Impact Analysis: By transferring the credit, the R&D company secures $53,460 in immediate working capital, converting a deferred tax asset into vital funding for current operations or capital expenditures. The buyer, the resource corporation, immediately uses the certificate to offset $\$59,400$ in state tax liability, achieving a $\$5,940$ instant cash tax saving on the transaction. This outcome demonstrates the mechanism’s success in mobilizing capital where it is most needed.
VII. Conclusion: Strategic Implications for Businesses Operating in Alaska
The Alaska R&D tax credit, structured as 18% of the apportioned federal credit, is a crucial component of the state’s fiscal policy designed to stimulate innovation. Its integration with the transferable tax credit certificate, mandated by AS 43.55.023, significantly amplifies the benefit by functioning as a critical liquidity accelerator for businesses engaged in qualified research. This system ensures that tax benefits are monetized immediately, supporting enterprise growth irrespective of current profitability.
Successful monetization requires rigorous adherence to technical compliance standards, including meeting the federal four-part test for qualified research (IRC § 41) and strict procedural filing requirements, such as utilizing Alaska Form 6390. The specific state guidance outlined by the Department of Revenue, including the mandatory application for the transferable certificate, introduces a 120-day certainty period for certification.
The explicit allowance for the re-transferability of the tax credit certificate under Alaska law provides a strategic advantage, potentially increasing the market demand and reducing the necessary discount relative to federal credits that are limited to a single sale. Furthermore, the requirement for a waiver of confidentiality during the transfer process is an essential risk management tool for both the DOR and the buyer, demanding meticulous record-keeping by the original credit generator.
Ultimately, this tax mechanism offers substantial opportunities for both innovative Alaskan companies (sellers) needing cash flow and large corporations (buyers) seeking efficient, verified tax offsets. It solidifies Alaska’s position as a state committed to rewarding and retaining technological and resource-based innovation by making its tax incentives financially accessible through market solutions.
Are you eligible?
Why choose us?
Pass an Audit?
What is the R&D Tax Credit?
The Research & Experimentation Tax Credit (or R&D Tax Credit), is a general business tax credit under Internal Revenue Code section 41 for companies that incur research and development (R&D) costs in the United States. The credits are a tax incentive for performing qualified research in the United States, resulting in a credit to a tax return. For the first three years of R&D claims, 6% of the total qualified research expenses (QRE) form the gross credit. In the 4th year of claims and beyond, a base amount is calculated, and an adjusted expense line is multiplied times 14%. Click here to learn more.
Never miss a deadline again
Stay up to date on IRS processes
Discover R&D in your industry
R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services
Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.
If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.
R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services
creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.
Our Fees
Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/
Choose your state
