The Arizona R&D Tax Credit: Navigating the Critical 150 Full-Time Employee Limit for Refundability

The 150 Full-Time Employee (FTE) limit is a strict headcount threshold mandated by Arizona statute (A.R.S. § 41-1507) that governs a company’s eligibility to receive the partial cash refund component of the state’s Research and Development (R&D) tax credit. A taxpayer must employ fewer than 150 full-time employees, counted on a worldwide basis, to access this crucial non-dilutive source of capital, which is capped at $100,000 per taxpayer annually.

Section 1: The Critical 150 FTE Threshold in Arizona R&D Tax Law

The Arizona Credit for Increased Research Activities provides a powerful incentive for businesses conducting qualified research within the state. This credit exists in two distinct forms—non-refundable and refundable—and the 150 FTE limit serves as the sole statutory gatekeeper determining access to the latter, highly strategic benefit.

1.1. The Strategic Context: Refundable vs. Non-Refundable Credits

The non-refundable credit is the foundation of the program, established under A.R.S. § 43-1168. It is administered by the Arizona Department of Revenue (ADOR).1 The credit is calculated using a tiered approach based on qualified research expenses (QREs) that exceed a statutory base amount, mirroring federal methodologies. For tax years through 2030, the rate is 24% on the first $2.5 million in excess QREs, plus 15% on any excess QREs above $2.5 million.1 This credit is used exclusively to offset the taxpayer’s Arizona income tax liability.3

If the calculated credit exceeds the taxpayer’s income tax liability, the remainder is known as the “excess credit”.3 This is where the refundable credit becomes relevant. The refundable program is established under A.R.S. § 41-1507 and is managed by the Arizona Commerce Authority (ACA).1

The refundable option is explicitly designed to support small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) that may have significant R&D expenditures but low or zero current-year tax liabilities, which is common for startups or high-growth ventures.1 By electing refundability, these companies can convert a portion of their unused credit into immediate cash flow, providing essential non-dilutive liquidity for continued in-state innovation and investment.4 The 150 FTE limit is, therefore, not merely a tax rule but operates as an economic development policy filter, directing public funds specifically toward smaller, scaling enterprises.

1.2. Statutory Foundation and Eligibility Requirements

To qualify for the refundable credit, a taxpayer must first qualify for the non-refundable credit and then meet two administrative requirements: (1) employ less than 150 full-time employees, and (2) secure a mandatory Certificate of Qualification (Certificate) from the ACA.1

This structure introduces a crucial element of compliance stacking: a company’s successful utilization of the refundable credit hinges on satisfying three sets of regulatory criteria: adherence to federal IRC § 41 standards (for R&D qualification), compliance with ADOR’s calculation and filing rules (Form 308), and meeting the ACA’s size threshold (150 FTE) and administrative process. A failure to meet the requirements of any single regulatory body—for example, miscalculating the base credit or failing the FTE test—will result in the forfeiture of the refundable benefit.

Section 2: Defining and Calculating Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs)

The definition and calculation of the 150 FTE limit are critical, as the threshold is strictly enforced and is subject to complex aggregation rules, particularly for multi-entity businesses.

2.1. The Full-Time Employee Definition

Arizona statute requires the taxpayer to employ “fewer than 150 full-time employees”.3 It is important to note that Arizona’s public tax forms, such as ADOR Form 308 instructions, confirm this requirement but do not always explicitly detail the specific administrative calculation methodology for determining “full-time employee” (e.g., whether 30 hours per week or 40 hours per week constitutes full-time status for this specific purpose, or how part-time hours are aggregated into equivalents).3 In practice, many taxpayers rely on interpretations consistent with other state and federal FTE definitions, but specialized guidance from the ACA program manager is generally advised to ensure compliance specific to this credit.

2.2. Critical Measurement Parameters: Worldwide Count and Date

Two parameters significantly increase the stringency of the 150 FTE test:

1. Worldwide Scope: The employee headcount must include all employees on a worldwide basis.7 This worldwide requirement is a preventative measure against large multinational corporations attempting to access the small business cash refund through a single, small Arizona subsidiary.
2. Measurement Date: The headcount must be measured as of December 31 of the tax year for which the expenses are claimed.7 This measurement date makes strategic workforce management near year-end a critical factor for companies close to the 150-employee boundary.

2.3. Aggregation Rules: Treatment of Related Entities

For multi-entity taxpayers, the 150 FTE threshold is not applied individually to the entity performing the R&D, but to the entire economic enterprise, often referred to as the unitary group or affiliated group.

Corporate Aggregation: ADOR guidance explicitly states that if two or more members of a unitary group or an Arizona affiliated group incur qualifying expenses, the individual members are not considered separate taxpayers.3 When a combined or consolidated return is filed, the group is treated as a single taxpayer for credit calculation and qualification purposes.3 Consequently, the total worldwide FTE count must aggregate across all members of that group. If the aggregate worldwide FTE count equals or exceeds 150, the entire group is disqualified from claiming the refundable portion, even if the Arizona R&D facility itself employs only a fraction of that number. This organizational structure oversight constitutes a major compliance risk for foreign-owned or private equity-backed entities—a strategic oversight that can negate access to the cash incentive.

Pass-Through Entity Rules: For S Corporations and Partnerships, while the calculated credit passes through to the individual shareholders or partners for use on their personal tax returns, the entity itself must apply to the ACA for the Certificate of Qualification on behalf of its owners.3 The 150 FTE limit applies to the entity level, meaning the entity’s worldwide FTE count must be under 150 for the partners/shareholders to qualify for the refund.

The following table summarizes the crucial parameters governing FTE eligibility:

Arizona R&D Tax Credit: 150 FTE Eligibility Parameters

Section 3: Dual Administration and Compliance Procedures (ADOR and ACA)

The administration of the Arizona R&D tax credit is bifurcated, requiring distinct compliance steps with the Arizona Department of Revenue (ADOR) for tax liability purposes and the Arizona Commerce Authority (ACA) for the refundable component.

3.1. The Role of the Arizona Department of Revenue (ADOR)

The ADOR handles the computation of the actual credit amount using Form 308. This process determines the gross credit by comparing current year QREs to the computed base amount (using either the regular method or the Alternative Simplified Credit, or ASC, method).8 After the gross credit is determined, the ADOR process dictates that the credit must first be applied against the taxpayer’s current year income tax liability. Any remainder is the “excess credit” eligible for refundability.

3.2. The Role of the Arizona Commerce Authority (ACA)

The ACA’s role is administrative and focuses on program oversight, managing the annual statewide cap, and validating eligibility—including the 150 FTE requirement.1

3.2.1. Mandatory Certificate of Qualification

The primary administrative hurdle managed by the ACA is the application for and receipt of the Certificate of Qualification.4 Without this Certificate, no refund can be granted, even if the company meets the 150 FTE threshold and has a large excess credit.3 The maximum refund amount is ultimately limited by the figure specified on the Certificate.

3.2.2. The First-Come, First-Served Application Timeline

The application timeline introduces a significant element of competition and risk. Refunds are processed on a highly competitive, first-come, first-served basis, determined by the exact date and time the application is filed via the ACA’s Electronic Application System (EASY).10

• Calendar Year Taxpayers: Must apply on or after the first business day of the subsequent calendar year.5
• Fiscal Year Taxpayers: May file their application on or after the first business day following the end of their fiscal year.13

This strict timing creates a critical synchronization challenge. Companies must complete a thorough R&D study and estimate their final excess credit amount well in advance of the traditional tax filing deadline to submit the ACA application immediately after the tax year closes. Since the statewide cap is limited (and has historically been over-subscribed), a delay in securing the ACA Certificate means a high probability of missing the funding window, rendering the 150 FTE qualification moot.13

A crucial compliance detail is that the taxpayer’s election to make the credit refundable must be made when the original tax return (Form 308, filed with ADOR) is submitted to claim the current year’s credit.3 If the taxpayer successfully secures the ACA Certificate but then fails to properly elect the refund on the original ADOR filing, the refundable portion is lost.

3.2.3. Additional Non-Tax Requirements

Beyond the 150 FTE limit, the ACA enforces other requirements not directly related to R&D methodology. Specifically, the employer must participate in eVerify for screening new hires.7 This links the R&D financial incentive directly to state employment verification policy, meaning a failure in this non-tax compliance area can also result in disqualification from the refundable portion.

Section 4: Mechanics of the Refundable Credit Calculation

Once a taxpayer meets the 150 FTE limit and secures the ACA Certificate, the exact cash refund amount is calculated subject to specific limitations, caps, and trade-offs.

4.1. The 75% Limitation Rule and Forfeiture

The amount a taxpayer is eligible to receive as a refund is the lesser of 75% of the excess credit, or the maximum refund amount specified on the ACA Certificate.3

This 75% threshold introduces a mandatory trade-off: if the taxpayer elects the refund option, the remaining 25% of the excess credit (plus any amount above the statewide or taxpayer cap) is generally waived or forfeited.4 This prevents the taxpayer from claiming an immediate cash refund while simultaneously carrying forward the full excess credit amount for future tax offset.

4.2. Taxpayer and Statewide Caps

The cash refund mechanism is subject to two statutory caps that define the maximum liquidity provided by the program:

1. Maximum Refund per Taxpayer: The maximum cash refund allowed for any single taxpayer in a single tax year is strictly limited to $100,000.5
2. Statewide Aggregate Cap: The total refundable amount distributed across all qualifying taxpayers is constrained by an annual statewide calendar year cap. Historically, this cap was set at $5 million.2

A significant legislative change occurred with Senate Bill 1562 (SB 1562), which increased the aggregate annual cap on the refundable portion of the R&D credit from $5,000,000 to $10,000,000.14 This increase, often applied retroactively, substantially improved the likelihood of small businesses (those meeting the 150 FTE test) securing a portion of the limited fund, thereby mitigating the risk associated with cap over-subscription. For instance, in one year under the previous cap, demand reached over $6.7 million.5 The increase signals legislative recognition of the program’s utility for small business liquidity.

The following table summarizes the mechanics of the refundable credit:

Arizona R&D Refund Mechanics and Statutory Caps

4.3. The Cash vs. Carryforward Strategic Dilemma

The strict limits on the refundable credit necessitate a careful strategic analysis, especially for companies with significant R&D spend.

Unused non-refundable R&D credits can generally be carried forward for 10 consecutive taxable years (for tax years beginning after January 1, 2022; 15 years prior to that date).12 While the refund provides immediate cash, it results in the forfeiture of the 25% non-refundable portion and a waiver of the carryforward potential for the refunded 75%.

A high-QRE company might generate a substantial gross credit, perhaps approaching $1 million.16 If the company has zero tax liability, 75% of that credit would be a large figure, potentially over $700,000. However, the cash refund is capped at $100,000. By electing the refund, the company receives the $100,000 but sacrifices hundreds of thousands of dollars in long-term carryforward credit value. This means the refund program is financially optimized for companies with smaller overall excess credits; for large R&D spenders, retaining the full excess credit as a carryforward against future, projected tax liabilities may yield a higher net present value (NPV).

Section 5: Practical Example: Navigating the 150 FTE Threshold for Liquidity

The following example illustrates how the 150 FTE limit and aggregation rules critically impact a company’s ability to secure immediate cash flow.

5.1. Scenario Setup: Calculating the Base Credit and Excess Credit

A technology company, InnovateTech Inc. (an Arizona C-Corporation), is calculating its R&D credit for the 2024 tax year.

Gross Credit Calculation:

1. Excess QREs: $3,500,000 (QREs) – $1,000,000 (Base) = $2,500,000.
2. Gross Credit: 24% of the $2,500,000 excess = $600,000.10
3. Excess Credit (The Refundable Pool): $600,000 (Gross Credit) – $150,000 (Tax Liability) = $450,000.

5.2. Scenario Analysis 1: The Qualified SME

Assume InnovateTech Inc. is an independent company with a Worldwide Full-Time Employee count of 120 as of December 31, 2024.

Since the FTE count (120) is less than 150, InnovateTech qualifies for the refundable credit and successfully secures an ACA Certificate of Qualification early in the year, ensuring access to the statewide cap.

Refund Calculation:

• Excess Credit: $450,000
• 75% Refundable Amount: 75% of $450,000 = $337,500
• Actual Refund Received (Capped): The refund is the lesser of the 75% amount or the $100,000 taxpayer cap. InnovateTech receives $100,000 cash.12
• Amount Forfeited: $450,000 (Excess Credit) – $100,000 (Refund) = $350,000. This remaining $350,000 of excess credit is waived/forfeited upon election of the refund.

Conclusion: InnovateTech secures a critical $100,000 in non-dilutive capital immediately, demonstrating the powerful liquidity benefit of meeting the 150 FTE threshold.

5.3. Scenario Analysis 2: The Disqualified Enterprise (Aggregation Failure)

Assume InnovateTech Inc. maintains an Arizona staff of 140 FTEs, but it is a subsidiary of GlobalCorp, a unitary affiliated group. GlobalCorp’s worldwide aggregated FTE count is 210 employees.3

Result: Despite its local status as an SME and its significant R&D activity in Arizona, InnovateTech is disqualified from the refundable program. The mandatory application of the unitary group aggregation rules means the entire entity (GlobalCorp, 210 FTEs) exceeds the 150 FTE limit, failing the qualification test.

Financial Outcome:

• Gross Credit: $600,000 (calculated as before).
• Offset against tax liability: $150,000 is used to reduce tax.
• Excess Credit: The remaining $450,000 excess credit cannot be refunded because the 150 FTE threshold was breached at the group level.
• This full $450,000 excess credit is retained as a non-refundable carryforward for up to 10 consecutive years.12

Conclusion: The failure of the aggregation rule results in a critical loss of $100,000 in immediate cash flow, reinforcing that organizational structure and worldwide headcount must be diligently monitored by any corporate group targeting the Arizona refundable R&D credit.

Conclusion: Strategic Implications for Arizona Growth Companies

The 150 Full-Time Employee limit stands as the pivotal determinant for converting the Arizona R&D tax credit from a future tax reduction (non-refundable carryforward) into immediate cash liquidity. This threshold successfully segments the R&D incentive market, directing scarce refundable resources primarily to small and mid-sized enterprises (SMEs) whose need for immediate working capital often outweighs the long-term value of a carryforward credit.

For companies operating near this limit or within complex corporate structures, strategic tax planning is paramount. Compliance requires not only achieving the FTE count but also navigating the dual administrative process of the ADOR (for calculation) and the ACA (for certification), compounded by the strict first-come, first-served mechanism for accessing the competitive statewide cap, now increased to $10 million.

Ultimately, maximizing the Arizona R&D benefit requires a comprehensive strategy that scrutinizes the worldwide employee count, preemptively addresses affiliated or unitary group aggregation risks, and synchronizes the timing of the ACA application with the year-end headcount measurement. A sophisticated understanding of this limit ensures that qualifying companies can effectively secure the maximum $100,000 annual cash refund, transforming R&D investment into immediate, tangible capital.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/