The 75% Refund Limitation
"Qualified small businesses in Arizona may elect to receive a cash refund for their excess R&D credits, but the payout is capped at 75% of the excess amount, requiring the forfeiture of the remaining 25%."
Based on A.R.S. § 43-1183 and Arizona Department of Revenue Guidelines.
Impact Simulator
Adjust the values below to see how the limitation impacts your potential cash refund versus your credit carryforward. Visualizing the "Forfeited" portion is crucial for decision-making.
Results Summary
*The "Forfeited" amount is permanently lost and cannot be carried forward if the refund is elected.
Detailed Analysis
Legal basis, statutory guidance, and operational mechanics.
Statutory Basis: A.R.S. § 43-1183
The Arizona Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credit is governed primarily by Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 43-1183 for corporations and § 43-1074.01 for individuals/partnerships. The refundability provision is a special incentive designed to aid cash-flow-constrained small businesses.
Unlike the federal R&D credit, which is typically non-refundable (except for the payroll offset option for startups), Arizona allows "Qualified Small Businesses" to convert their non-refundable credit into a refundable one. However, the law explicitly states the cost of this conversion:
"If the taxpayer... elects to receive a refund... the refund amount shall be seventy-five per cent of the excess credit... and the remainder of the excess credit is waived."
This statutory language creates the "75% Limitation." It acts as a discount rate on the value of the credit in exchange for immediate liquidity. The remaining 25% is not a tax payment, but rather a forfeiture of the asset.
Strategic Decision: Refund vs. Carryforward
| Feature | Refund Election (75% Cap) | Standard Carryforward (100%) |
|---|---|---|
| Immediate Benefit | High (Cash in hand) | None (Future benefit only) |
| Total Asset Value | 75% of Face Value | 100% of Face Value |
| Best For... | Pre-revenue startups, cash-poor companies, high burn rate ventures. | Profitable companies, those expecting significant tax liability in next 1-5 years. |
| Carryforward Period | N/A (Excess is waived) | 15 Years |
The "Cost of Capital" Argument
While losing 25% seems steep, for a startup raising capital at a high cost (e.g., selling equity), non-dilutive capital (the tax refund) is extremely valuable. If your cost of capital exceeds the 25% "haircut," taking the refund is mathematically superior to waiting years to use the credit.
The Profitability Horizon
If a company expects to turn a significant profit next year, carrying forward 100% of the credit to offset that future liability is often the better choice. The 75% limitation is essentially a fee for early access to the funds.
Conclusion
The Arizona R&D Tax Credit's 75% refund limitation is a calculated trade-off. It provides critical liquidity to small, innovative firms that may not have tax liabilities to offset, but it extracts a 25% premium for this benefit. Understanding this mechanism is essential for CFOs and founders to optimize their tax strategy and cash flow planning.
Detailed Analysis of the 75% Refund Limitation in the Arizona R&D Tax Credit Program
I. Executive Summary: The Definition of Refund Limitation
1.1. The Limitation in Brief (Statutory Requirement)
The Arizona Research and Development (R&D) tax credit refund is limited to 75% of the amount by which the calculated allowable credit exceeds the taxpayer’s Arizona income tax liability for the taxable year. This mechanism provides immediate liquidity, transforming a portion of the otherwise nonrefundable excess credit into cash for eligible small businesses.1
1.2. Refundability Context and Dual Administration
The Arizona R&D credit operates under a dual structure: it is primarily a nonrefundable tax credit, meaning its benefit is typically realized through the reduction of corporate or individual Arizona income tax liability.2 However, the program incorporates a refundable component, which is an optional election available exclusively to specific businesses classified as “qualified small businesses” that meet precise criteria, particularly size limitations.3
This refundable election is designed to act as a crucial cash flow bridge. It specifically targets innovative startups or early-stage firms that often incur substantial Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) but generate minimal or zero state tax liability. By offering a 75% refund option, the state transforms the R&D incentive from a passive tax offset tool into an active economic development and cash infusion instrument, thereby directly supporting nascent R&D endeavors and encouraging current investment.
The administration of the refundable credit is bifurcated, demanding coordination between two key state agencies. The Arizona Department of Revenue (ADOR) is responsible for calculating the total allowable credit amount and managing any nonrefundable carryforward balances. The Arizona Commerce Authority (ACA), conversely, manages the refundable portion, holding responsibility for issuing the mandatory Certificate of Qualification and overseeing the enforcement of the annual statewide funding cap.1
1.3. Key Limitations at a Glance
The financial value and accessibility of the refundable R&D credit are defined by three distinct and simultaneous constraints that tax planners must address.
Table: Arizona R&D Refund Program Constraints
| Limit Type | Definition/Value | Governing Authority | Statutory Basis |
| Calculation Limit | 75% of the excess credit | ADOR / A.R.S. § 43-1168 | 1 |
| Individual Cap | $100,000 maximum per taxpayer | ACA Regulation | 5 |
| Statewide Aggregate Cap | $10,000,000 annually (recently increased) | A.R.S. (S.B. 1562) | 2 |
II. Statutory and Regulatory Framework of Refundability
2.1. Locating the Law: A.R.S. § 43-1168 and the Definition of Excess
The legal foundation for the refundable credit is established in the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). Specifically, A.R.S. § 43-1168 (for corporations) and § 43-1074.01 (for individuals) contain the explicit constraints on refundability. The statutory language dictates that the refund is limited to 75% of the amount by which the allowable credit under this section exceeds the taxpayer’s income tax liability for the taxable year.1
This precise wording confirms that the refundable amount is not 75% of the total R&D credit generated, but rather 75% of the unused credit remaining after it has been applied to offset the current year’s tax liability. This unused amount becomes the refundable base. Once determined and approved, the refund is processed according to the payment rules prescribed by A.R.S. § 42-1118 and is subject to state mechanisms for setoff under § 42-1122.1
2.2. Defining the “Qualified Small Business” Requirement
Access to the refundability feature is conditional upon the taxpayer qualifying as a small business. This policy targets smaller enterprises for immediate financial assistance. A taxpayer must employ fewer than 150 full-time employees worldwide to be considered eligible for the refundable component.3
Beyond meeting the employee threshold, eligibility requires a mandatory procedural step: the taxpayer must apply to, and successfully obtain, a Certificate of Qualification from the Arizona Commerce Authority (ACA), pursuant to A.R.S. § 41-1507.1 Submission of this certificate to ADOR with the income tax return is non-negotiable for validating the refund claim.
2.3. Precursor Calculation: Determining the Total Allowable Credit
Before the 75% limitation can be factored in, the total R&D credit (TAC) must be computed. Arizona provides flexibility in this calculation. Effective for tax years ending on or after December 31, 2023, taxpayers may elect to use either the Regular Method or the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) method.8
The availability of the ASC method is a key strategic consideration. The ASC method often lowers the statutory base amount (calculated as 50% of the average QREs over the prior three years, or 0% for new filers without prior QREs).3 A lower base amount typically results in a higher calculation of “Excess QREs,” thereby increasing the total allowable credit. A larger total allowable credit increases the pool available for the 75% refund calculation, which is particularly beneficial for maximizing the benefit before the individual $100,000 cap is triggered.
The calculated credit is applied using a tiered percentage structure based on the amount of QREs exceeding the base amount (Excess QREs) 3:
- 24% on the first $2,500,000 of the Excess QREs.
- 15% on the amount of Excess QREs exceeding $2,500,000 (these rates are subject to scheduled reductions post-2030).3
The order of credit utilization is critically important. ADOR guidance mandates that the refund of the R&D credit is determined after the taxpayer’s Arizona income tax liability has been calculated and reduced by all other allowable tax credits.10 This sequencing means the R&D credit is subordinate to many other nonrefundable credits. If a business possesses other nonrefundable credits, their prior utilization against the tax liability will naturally increase the size of the R&D credit’s unused, or excess, portion, thereby increasing the potential base for the 75% refund calculation.
III. The Arizona Commerce Authority (ACA) Administrative Process
3.1. The Critical Role of Certification and Timing
The ACA plays a centralized role in managing the refundable pool and enforcing the annual aggregate cap. Securing the necessary Certificate of Qualification from the ACA is a prerequisite for submitting a valid refund claim to ADOR.1
The ACA processes applications through its Electronic Application System based on a strict first-come, first-served principle, determined by the date and time stamp of submission.5 It is paramount that the application utilizes actual numbers, not estimates.6 Calendar year taxpayers are eligible to file their ACA application on or after the first business day following the close of the previous calendar year. Fiscal year taxpayers may apply on or after the first business day following their fiscal year end.6
3.2. Strategic Application Risk: First-Come, First-Served and the Lottery
The refundable pool is limited by a statewide cap, leading to intense competition for funds. Historically, demand has exceeded the available capacity, as evidenced by refund applications totaling over $6.7 million against the previous $5 million cap in 2022.11
To ensure equitable access during peak demand, a random selection process (lottery) is implemented for all substantially complete applications received on the first business day of the calendar year.6 Following this lottery, subsequent applications are prioritized strictly by the time of receipt.6 This structure heavily rewards preparedness and immediate action.
This administrative process creates a mandatory timing synchronization challenge for taxpayers. ADOR requires the refund election to be made on the original return filing.10 However, the ACA requires an application based on actual finalized year-end numbers.6 Therefore, a business seeking the refund must finalize its R&D calculations and secure the ACA certificate before filing its state tax return. The start of the ACA application window (January 1st) serves as the critical choke point for accessing the refund, demanding swift action immediately following year-end closing procedures.
IV. Financial Constraints and the Refund Cap Structure
The utility of the 75% limitation is defined and restricted by fixed financial boundaries.
4.1. The Individual Taxpayer Cap: $100,000 Maximum
Irrespective of the total credit generated or the amount calculated under the 75% statutory limit, the maximum cash refund payable to any single taxpayer in a given tax year is strictly capped at $100,000.5 This consistent individual cap ensures that the refundable incentive is widely distributed among qualifying small businesses and prevents any single company from monopolizing the annual statewide funding pool.
4.2. The Aggregate Statewide Refund Pool: The $10 Million Commitment
The total amount of cash refunds that the State of Arizona authorizes for all taxpayers annually is subject to a hard aggregate limit. Through recent legislation (S.B. 1562), the statewide annual cap on the refundable portion of the R&D credit was significantly increased from $5,000,000 to $10,000,000.2
This increase has been codified by ADOR, which confirms it cannot approve more than $10 million in combined individual and corporate income tax credits for a calendar year.7 The decision to double the funding available signals a strengthened commitment by the state to support small business innovation and directly addresses the high demand previously witnessed under the $5 million limit. This adjustment increases the likelihood of approval for timely applicants, reducing the risk of competitive exhaustion.
4.3. Carryforward of Unused Credits and the 25% Nonrefundable Portion
The 75% statutory limitation means that 25% of the excess credit is mandatorily nonrefundable and must be carried forward. Additionally, any portion of the 75% amount that exceeds the $100,000 individual cap is also carried forward.
The carryforward duration for this nonrefundable residual has been subject to policy changes:
- For taxable years beginning before January 1, 2022, unused credits could be carried forward for 15 consecutive taxable years.2
- For taxable years beginning January 1, 2022, and thereafter, the carryforward period was reduced to 10 consecutive taxable years.2
The legislative decision to reduce the carryforward period while increasing the refundable pool emphasizes a state preference for immediate R&D investment and utilization over long-term tax deferral. Companies that elect for the refund must manage this reduced carryforward timeline, recognizing that the long-term utility of the remaining 25% is now confined to a 10-year window.
V. Detailed Calculation Methodology and Example
5.1. The Five Steps to Determining Refundability
The calculation process demonstrates how the 75% limitation and the $100,000 individual cap interact.
- Step 1: Calculate Total Allowable Credit (TAC): Determine the R&D credit generated for the year using the chosen methodology (Regular or ASC) based on Arizona QREs.3
- Step 2: Determine Final Arizona Income Tax Liability (L): Calculate the final tax owed after applying all other allowable tax credits, as the R&D refund calculation occurs last.10
- Step 3: Calculate the Excess Credit (E): Subtract the liability offset from the total credit (E = TAC – L). This is the base amount subject to refundability.1
- Step 4: Apply the 75% Statutory Refund Limitation (R_Base): Calculate 75% of the Excess Credit (R_Base = E $\times$ 0.75). This is the maximum amount eligible for the cash payment under A.R.S. § 43-1168.1
- Step 5: Apply the $100,000 Per-Taxpayer Cap (R_Final): The final eligible refund is the lesser of the amount calculated in Step 4 or the mandated individual cap of $100,000.6
5.2. Practical Case Study: Small Business Refund Scenario
Assume AZ Innovate LLC, a qualified small business, generated a significant R&D credit and has minimal current tax liability.
Financial Data:
- Total Allowable AZ R&D Credit (TAC): $180,000
- Current Year Arizona Income Tax Liability (L): $15,000
| Calculation Metric | Amount | Statutory Application |
| A. Total Allowable AZ R&D Credit (TAC) | $180,000 | Calculated credit generated |
| B. Credit Used to Offset Liability (L) | $15,000 | Used to offset current tax liability |
| C. Excess Credit (E = A – B) | $165,000 | Unused credit remaining |
| D. 75% Refund Base (E $\times$ 0.75) | $123,750 | Maximum amount eligible for cash refund |
| E. Individual Refund Cap | $100,000 | Fixed maximum allowed per taxpayer |
| F. Final Approved Refund Amount | $100,000 | Lesser of Line D or Line E |
| G. Remaining Nonrefundable Carryforward | $65,000 | $180,000 total credit – ($15,000 used + $100,000 refunded) |
Analysis of Results:
In this scenario, the business eliminates its $15,000 liability and receives the maximum possible cash refund of $100,000. The total credit utilized or refunded is $115,000. The remaining $65,000 is automatically converted into a nonrefundable carryforward.
This $65,000 carryforward consists of two components dictated by the statutory limits: (1) the 25% portion of the excess credit that is statutorily excluded from refundability (25% of $165,000 = $41,250), and (2) the portion of the calculated 75% refund base that was limited by the individual cap (Line D of $123,750 minus the $100,000 cap = $23,750). The sum of these two amounts ($41,250 + $23,750) precisely matches the $65,000 carried forward, which must be utilized within the 10-year limit.2
5.3. ADOR Reporting and Pass-Through Entity Compliance
Taxpayers must formalize their claim and election of refundability on their original tax return filing using ADOR forms.10 The primary calculation is done on Form 308, while individuals use Form 308-I. Pass-through entities, such as S Corporations and Partnerships, calculate the credit at the entity level but must pass the credit and the corresponding refund eligibility through to their owners using Form 308-S (shareholders) and Form 308-P (partners).9
While the application to the ACA for the Certificate of Qualification must be initiated by the entity on behalf of its owners 10, the utilization of the credit against liability and the application of the $100,000 cap occurs at the individual owner level. This decentralized benefit structure requires precise and early coordination between the entity and its owners, as the ACA application requires final, actualized numbers, which in turn depend on the owner’s individual tax situation.
VI. Strategic Planning and Policy Implications
6.1. Balancing Cash Flow Needs vs. Tax Optimization
The choice to pursue the refundable credit represents a fundamental strategic decision for a small business. Companies prioritizing immediate liquidity will often elect for the refund, securing up to $100,000 in cash, even though this choice results in sacrificing 25% of the excess credit’s value, consigning it instead to the nonrefundable carryforward balance.1
The recent expansion of the statewide cap to $10 million substantially improves the predictability of this cash flow. Under the previous $5 million limit, the risk of application denial was significant, complicating financial projections. With the increased cap, the refundable option is now a more reliable and dependable component of a small business’s financial planning.2
6.2. Policy Nuance: Distinguishing Refundable Components
The state’s policy framework differentiates between various types of R&D expenses. While the core corporate R&D activity is eligible for the 75% refund, research conducted at a state university and funded by the taxpayer—a specific category of research activity—is designated as nonrefundable.3 This university portion is subject to separate (and often shorter, e.g., five-year) carryforward rules.3 This regulatory distinction suggests a deliberate prioritization: the state uses immediate cash support for proprietary, business-led R&D and uses long-term tax deferral to incentivize funding for academic research collaborations.
6.3. Future Outlook: Maintaining Compliance and Maximizing Benefit
Arizona’s R&D tax credit regulations are subject to ongoing modification, evidenced by the addition of the ASC method, the reduction in carryforward periods, and the cap increases.2 Therefore, taxpayers must continually monitor published guidance from both ADOR and the ACA.
For businesses seeking to maximize the refundable portion, the need for immediate, proactive QRE documentation and calculation is paramount. Success in securing the refund hinges entirely on the ability to submit a complete and accurate ACA application as early as possible after the year-end close, minimizing the window in which the $10 million statewide cap could be exhausted.6
Are you eligible?
Why choose us?
Pass an Audit?
What is the R&D Tax Credit?
The Research & Experimentation Tax Credit (or R&D Tax Credit), is a general business tax credit under Internal Revenue Code section 41 for companies that incur research and development (R&D) costs in the United States. The credits are a tax incentive for performing qualified research in the United States, resulting in a credit to a tax return. For the first three years of R&D claims, 6% of the total qualified research expenses (QRE) form the gross credit. In the 4th year of claims and beyond, a base amount is calculated, and an adjusted expense line is multiplied times 14%. Click here to learn more.
Never miss a deadline again
Stay up to date on IRS processes
Discover R&D in your industry
R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services
Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.
If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.
R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services
creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.
Our Fees
Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/
Choose your state
