The Arizona Base Amount
The Arizona Base Amount is the calculated baseline of historical research activity that a company must exceed to qualify for the R&D tax credit.
It ensures the credit rewards only incremental increases in research spending, rather than subsidizing routine operating expenses.
In the context of the Arizona Research & Development Tax Credit (Form 308), the Base Amount serves as a deduction from your current year's Qualified Research Expenses (QREs). Understanding this calculation is critical because a higher base amount directly reduces the available tax credit. It is derived from a complex interaction between a "Fixed Base Percentage" and your average annual gross receipts.
The Base Amount can never be less than 50% of current QREs.
Average of the prior 4 years' gross receipts is used.
Applied to the excess of QREs over the Base Amount (up to $2.5M).
Anatomy of the Calculation
The Arizona Department of Revenue follows federal guidance (IRC § 41) for this calculation. The Base Amount is the result of multiplying your Fixed Base Percentage by your Average Annual Gross Receipts.
Fixed Base Percentage
Startups: 3% (Fixed)
Established: Historical Ratio
Avg. Annual Gross Receipts
Average of prior 4 tax years
Base Amount
Subject to 50% Floor Rule
Click on a box above to see a detailed explanation of that component and how it applies to Arizona Law.
Interactive Impact Calculator
Enter your financial data below to see how the Base Amount reduces your eligible QREs. Notice how the "50% Rule" acts as a floor, limiting the credit for high-revenue companies with low R&D growth.
Financial Inputs
Qualified Research Expenses (Wages, Supplies, Contract Research)
Average of the prior 4 years' receipts (net of returns).
Credit Allocation Visualization
The Grey area represents QREs disallowed by the Base Amount. The Blue area represents the eligible spend.
The "50% Rule" Trap
Why Growth Matters
Arizona law (conforming to IRC § 41(c)(2)) stipulates that the Base Amount cannot be less than 50% of the current year's QREs.
This creates a "floor." Even if your Gross Receipts are zero, your Base Amount will still be half of your research spending. This effectively caps the maximum effective credit rate at 12% of total QRE (24% rate applied to 50% of expenses).
- ✓ Scenario A: High QRE growth, Low Revenue growth = Maximum Credit.
- ✗ Scenario B: Flat QRE, High Revenue growth = Base Amount eats the credit.
Local Revenue Guidance & Citations
Arizona Revised Statutes
Defines the calculation of the research credit for corporations. Subsection A.1 specifies that the credit is based on the excess of qualified research expenses over the base amount.
Arizona generally conforms to the Internal Revenue Code definition of "Base Amount." This includes the Fixed Base Percentage calculation and the Minimum Base Amount (50% rule).
Conclusion
The Arizona Base Amount is the mechanism that ensures the R&D tax credit incentivizes new and increasing research efforts. For businesses, mastering this calculation—specifically managing the ratio between Gross Receipts and QREs—is essential for accurate forecasting and maximizing tax savings.
Disclaimer: This interactive report is for educational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax advice. Always consult with a qualified CPA or tax attorney regarding A.R.S. and ADOR compliance.
The Arizona R&D Tax Credit Base Amount: Statutory Framework, Calculation Methods, and ADOR Compliance Requirements
The Arizona Base Amount serves as a critical historical benchmark used to calculate the state’s Research and Development (R&D) income tax credit. This figure represents a taxpayer’s historical qualified research spending level, establishing the floor above which current-year expenses must rise to qualify for the incentive.
The Arizona R&D tax credit (A.R.S. § 43-1168) is fundamentally an incremental incentive, designed to reward taxpayers specifically for increasing their investment in qualified research activities within the state. The determination of this Base Amount is the most crucial and complex step in quantifying the eligible credit. It demands meticulous tracking of Arizona-sourced Qualified Research Expenses (QREs), gross receipts, and careful selection of a calculation methodology over specific multi-year look-back periods.
I. The Statutory Foundation of the Arizona R&D Base Amount
A. The Purpose of the Base Amount: Establishing the Incremental Threshold
The primary function of the Arizona Base Amount is to ensure that the R&D tax credit rewards increased research investment, rather than subsidizing a static level of activity. The credit mechanism requires a taxpayer to demonstrate increased research activity relative to a defined historical average.1 If the current year’s Arizona QREs do not surpass the calculated Base Amount, the taxpayer is ineligible to claim the credit for that period.
The calculated difference between the current year’s QREs and the Base Amount is referred to as “Excess QREs.” Only these Excess QREs serve as the multiplicand against which the state’s tiered credit rates are applied to generate the final credit value.2
B. Arizona’s Link to Federal Law (A.R.S. § 43-1168)
Arizona Revised Statute (A.R.S.) § 43-1168 governs the R&D credit, explicitly allowing a credit against Arizona taxes in an amount “determined pursuant to section 41 of the internal revenue code” (IRC § 41).1 This strong statutory linkage means that Arizona incorporates key federal definitions, including the definition of “Qualified Research Expenses” (QREs) and the structure for calculating the Base Amount as detailed in IRC § 41(c).1
A critical constraint for multi-state entities is the Arizona Department of Revenue (ADOR) guidance requiring that all inputs used in the calculation—QREs, the Fixed-Base Percentage (FBP), and Gross Receipts (GR)—must be strictly calculated based on Arizona-sourced activities.2 A taxpayer cannot simply use their federal calculation results; they must isolate all data pertaining only to Arizona operations.
C. The Incremental Credit Structure and Tiers
The Arizona R&D credit is applied to the Excess QREs using a two-tier rate structure for taxable years beginning before December 31, 2030.1
First, a rate of 24% is applied to the excess QREs up to the first $2,500,000 threshold. Second, a reduced rate of 15% is applied to any amount of excess QREs that exceeds that initial $2,500,000 threshold.1 Should the sum of excess QREs be greater than $2,500,000, the credit is equal to $600,000 plus 15% of the amount over the threshold.1 This structure incentivizes significant, but not unlimited, investment, focusing the highest rate on the initial $2.5 million of incremental activity.
| Excess QREs (QREs over Base Amount) | Arizona Credit Rate (Through 2030) | Credit Calculation |
| Up to $2,500,000 | 24% | $24\% \times \text{Excess QREs}$ |
| Amount Exceeding $2,500,000 | 15% | $\$600,000 + 15\% \times (\text{Excess QREs} – \$2,500,000)$ |
A separate, additional credit exists for basic research payments. Taxpayers that qualify for the general R&D credit may claim an additional 10% credit on the excess of basic research payments made during the taxable year to a university under the Arizona board of regents, over the qualified organization base period amount.1 This mechanism has its own distinct base calculation and is subject to annual statutory caps.1
II. Calculation Methodology 1: The Regular (Traditional) Base Amount
The Regular Method for calculating the Base Amount mirrors the traditional calculation approach found in IRC § 41(c), requiring the determination of a Fixed-Base Percentage (FBP) and tracking historical Arizona Gross Receipts (GR).
A. The Regular Base Amount Formula
The Base Amount under the Regular Method is calculated by multiplying the Fixed-Base Percentage by the average annual Arizona Gross Receipts for the four taxable years preceding the credit year.2
The formula, applied strictly using Arizona-sourced figures, is expressed as:
$$Base Amount = \text{Fixed-Base Percentage} \times \text{Average Prior 4-Year Arizona Gross Receipts}$$
B. Determining the Fixed-Base Percentage (FBP)
The FBP is a historical metric comparing research activity to sales volume and is statutorily capped at 16%.6
For established firms, specifically those that had both Arizona gross receipts and Arizona QREs for at least three taxable years beginning after December 31, 1983, and before January 1, 1989, the FBP is determined by the ratio that the aggregate Arizona qualified research expenses for that 1983-1988 base period bears to the aggregate Arizona gross receipts for the same period.4
For startup companies, a phase-in regime applies. New businesses benefit from a phase-in period where the FBP starts at 3% for the first five years during which they have QREs, gradually increasing over years six through ten.2 This policy mechanism directly lowers the initial Base Amount, effectively maximizing the available credit in the critical early growth years.
C. Calculating Arizona Gross Receipts (GR)
To determine the average annual gross receipts component of the formula, the taxpayer must identify the total Arizona gross receipts for the four taxable years preceding the current credit year.3 Only Arizona gross receipts are utilized, and these figures must exclude returns and allowances.2
For new entities that have been operating for less than four years prior to the credit year, the average is calculated based only on the number of years available. For example, a corporation beginning business in 2020 claiming the credit in 2022 would average the gross receipts from 2020 and 2021.4 If a taxpayer had no Arizona gross receipts, the Base Amount calculation defaults to the 50% statutory floor.2
D. The Statutory Floor Rule: The 50% Minimum Base
A crucial element derived from the federal structure, and applied by Arizona, is the statutory floor rule. This provision is designed to prevent excessive volatility in credit eligibility year-over-year. The calculated Base Amount must be subject to a minimum floor: the final Base Amount must be the greater of the amount calculated using the FBP/GR formula OR 50% of the current taxable year’s Arizona QREs.2
This 50% floor rule often determines the Base Amount for two types of taxpayers: those who have significantly reduced their R&D spending compared to prior years, and established firms with historically low FBP now showing only modest QRE growth. If a company’s current QREs drop below 50% of its average spending, the floor rule increases the Base Amount, which in turn reduces or eliminates the calculated Excess QREs, reinforcing the state’s policy focus on sustained or increasing research investment.
III. Calculation Methodology 2: The Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC)
The Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) method offers a streamlined approach, authorized by Arizona (effective beginning with the 2023 tax year).8 This methodology significantly reduces the administrative compliance burden by removing the requirement to track and rely on historical gross receipts and the Fixed-Base Percentage.
A. Authorization and Election
The ASC method is an elective choice for the taxpayer. This election must be made affirmatively and is generally considered irrevocable without prior approval from ADOR.2 Taxpayers pursuing the ASC do so primarily to simplify compliance if historical gross receipts are difficult to source in Arizona, or if the method yields a more advantageous calculation than the Regular Method.
B. Simplified Base Calculation
The ASC Base Amount relies exclusively on the taxpayer’s Arizona QREs from the three preceding taxable years.2
The Base Amount under the ASC is calculated as:
$$ASC Base Amount = 50\% \times \text{Average Prior 3-Year Arizona QREs}$$
For example, to calculate the Base Amount for the 2024 tax year using the ASC, the taxpayer would average the Arizona QREs incurred during 2021, 2022, and 2023, and then take 50% of that average.2 Notably, if a taxpayer had no Arizona QREs in the three preceding taxable years, the Base Amount under the ASC calculation is zero, provided they qualify for the method.2 A taxpayer who had no QREs in any of the three prior years, however, does not qualify for the ASC.8
C. Strategic Comparison and Methodology Selection
The use of a 50% factor applied to the three-year average QREs in Arizona’s ASC method is significantly more restrictive than the corresponding federal ASC method (which uses a 14% factor). This mandates that a company demonstrate robust QRE growth—specifically, QREs must exceed 50% of their recent historical average—to generate substantial Excess QREs.
The determination of which method to choose—Regular or ASC—requires careful modeling. The Regular Method is often superior for established companies with a historically low Fixed-Base Percentage, such as highly successful companies with high sales but historically modest R&D spending. Conversely, the ASC method often provides a greater benefit if the taxpayer’s QRE growth is exceptionally high (significantly greater than 50% annually) or if the historical gross receipt data required for the Regular Method is administratively challenging to isolate and source specifically to Arizona.
IV. Local State Revenue Office Guidance (ADOR Compliance)
Compliance with the Arizona R&D credit involves strict adherence to ADOR instructions and proper filing using the Form 308 series.
A. Required Filings and Data Certification
The credit must be claimed via Arizona Form 308 (for corporations or other entities) or Form 308-I (for individual taxpayers), which must be included with the corresponding tax return.9 The use of the taxpayer identification number (TIN) is mandatory, and failure to include it may subject the taxpayer to a penalty.9
The various parts of Form 308 are dedicated to the explicit calculation of the Base Amount and the resulting excess QREs, ultimately leading to the determination of the current year’s total available credit.9
B. Pass-Through Entities and Reporting Requirements
The credit is commonly utilized by pass-through entities. S Corporations and Partnerships must use Form 308-S and Form 308-P, respectively, to calculate the credit at the entity level before passing it through to the owners.9
When passing the credit through, the entities are required to clearly indicate on each Form 308-P or Form 308-S whether the amount being passed through to the partners or shareholders is refundable or non-refundable. If the credit is certified as refundable, a copy of the Certification received from the Arizona Commerce Authority (ACA) must be provided to each partner or shareholder.10
C. Meticulous Tracking of Carryforward Periods
Arizona law requires meticulous accounting of unused credit carryovers, which are subject to bifurcated expiration periods.4
- For credits generated in taxable years beginning before January 1, 2022, the credit that is unused may be carried forward to the next fifteen consecutive taxable years.4
- For credits generated in taxable years beginning from and after December 31, 2021, the credit that is unused may be carried forward for the next ten consecutive taxable years.4
ADOR Form 308 reflects this requirement by structuring the calculation of these two different carryover totals in separate sections (Part 8 and Part 9). This structural requirement in the forms highlights a heightened compliance requirement for managing historical credit balances. Failure to properly segment and apply the correct expiration period (15-year vs. 10-year) for carryforward credits can result in the unintended expiration and forfeiture of valuable credit balances. Furthermore, if a refund was received for any prior taxable year, no carryover of that credit is available from those years, and the carryover amount must be zero.4
V. Strategic Implications: Refundability vs. Carryforward
Taxpayers must make a high-stakes, often irrevocable, election regarding the disposition of their calculated R&D credit: utilizing the credit to offset tax liability (and carrying forward the remainder) versus applying for a cash refund.
A. The Partial Refund Program
The R&D credit includes a partial refund program targeted toward small businesses.11 To be eligible, the taxpayer must not have more than 150 worldwide employees as of December 31 of the year for which the expenses are claimed, and the employer must participate in eVerify for new hires.11
For qualified taxpayers, the maximum refundable amount is limited to 75% of the calculated excess credit.8 This refund program is highly competitive and is subject to a statewide aggregate annual cap. The cap was recently increased from $5,000,000 to $10,000,000 for the refundable portion (effective FY 2024).12 To obtain the refund, the taxpayer must submit an application electronically through the Arizona Commerce Authority’s (ACA) system. The ACA provides a Certificate of Qualification detailing the taxpayer’s name, the maximum refundable tax credit amount, and the tax year the refund is available.13
B. The Critical Election: Refund Forfeits Carryforward
The decision to seek a refund is an irrevocable choice that directly impacts future tax planning. If a taxpayer files a return claiming the refund of the R&D tax credit, they do not have any excess amount to carry forward from that year.4 Conversely, a taxpayer who files without claiming a refund is electing to carry the unused R&D credit forward.13
Taxpayers must weigh the present value of the immediate 75% cash refund against the full 100% value of the nonrefundable credit, which can be carried forward for up to 10 or 15 years. For businesses with low current Arizona tax liability but strong projections for higher future taxable income, choosing the refund means sacrificing 25% of the credit’s value plus the ability to offset future tax bills entirely. This analysis is critical for maximizing the lifetime value of the R&D credit.
VI. Detailed Illustrative Example: Calculating the Arizona Base Amount and Credit
This example compares the outcomes of the Regular and ASC methodologies, demonstrating how the choice of calculation method influences the final credit amount.
A. Scenario Setup (Hypothetical Tech Corp – Tax Year 2024)
A hypothetical technology corporation, established for several years, has consistent growth in both R&D spending and Arizona gross receipts. The company files its 2024 tax return and models both methods. The company’s historical FBP, based on the 1984-1988 statutory period, is low at 4.0%.
| Metric | 2024 (Credit Year) | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
| AZ QREs | $4,500,000 | $3,000,000 | $2,000,000 | $1,000,000 | $500,000 |
| AZ Gross Receipts (GR) | N/A | $30,000,000 | $25,000,000 | $20,000,000 | $15,000,000 |
| Assumed Fixed-Base Percentage (FBP) | 4.0% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
B. Regular Method Calculation
- Calculate 4-Year Average AZ GR (2020-2023):
$$(\$15,000,000 + \$20,000,000 + \$25,000,000 + \$30,000,000) \div 4 = \$22,500,000$$ - Calculate Formulaic Base Amount (FBP $\times$ Avg GR):
$$4.0\% \times \$22,500,000 = \$900,000$$ - Apply 50% Statutory Floor (50% of 2024 AZ QREs):
$$50\% \times \$4,500,000 = \$2,250,000$$ - Final Base Amount (Regular Method): The greater of Step 2 ($900,000) or Step 3 ($2,250,000).
$$\$2,250,000$$ - Excess QREs (Regular Method): Current QREs – Final Base Amount.
$$\$4,500,000 – \$2,250,000 = \$2,250,000$$ - Total Credit (Regular Method): $24\% \times \$2,250,000 = \$540,000$
C. ASC Method Calculation
- Calculate 3-Year Average AZ QREs (2021-2023):
$$(\$1,000,000 + \$2,000,000 + \$3,000,000) \div 3 = \$2,000,000$$ - Calculate ASC Base Amount (50% of 3-Year Avg QREs):
$$50\% \times \$2,000,000 = \$1,000,000$$ - Final Base Amount (ASC Method):
$$\$1,000,000$$ - Excess QREs (ASC Method): Current QREs – Final Base Amount.
$$\$4,500,000 – \$1,000,000 = \$3,500,000$$ - Total Credit (ASC Method): Apply tiered rates to $3,500,000 Excess QREs.
- $24\% \times \$2,500,000 = \$600,000$
- $15\% \times (\$3,500,000 – \$2,500,000) = 15\% \times \$1,000,000 = \$150,000$
- Total Credit (ASC Method): $\$600,000 + \$150,000 = \$750,000$
D. Conclusion of Example
In this scenario, the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) method yields a credit of $750,000, while the Regular Method yields $540,000. The Regular Method results in a lower credit because its Base Amount was constrained upward by the 50% statutory floor rule ($2.25 million). The ASC Base Amount ($1.0 million) was significantly lower, demonstrating that high-growth companies whose Base Amount is dictated by the 50% floor under the Regular Method are likely to benefit substantially from electing the ASC.
VII. Conclusion and Actionable Recommendations
The Arizona Base Amount is the lynchpin of the state’s R&D tax credit, serving as the statutory measure of incrementality required under A.R.S. § 43-1168. Taxpayers must recognize that Arizona’s calculation methodologies are distinct from the federal framework due to the strict requirement for Arizona-sourced data and the application of state-specific parameters, such as the high 50% factor used in the ASC calculation.
Actionable Recommendations for Tax Planning
- Model Both Calculation Methods Annually: Due to the complexity introduced by the 50% floor in the Regular Method and the 50% average QRE requirement in the ASC, taxpayers must model and project both methodologies before making the irrevocable election for the credit year. The example provided illustrates that failing to model the ASC can result in leaving significant credit value unclaimed.
- Strict Compliance with ADOR Carryforward Rules: Tax professionals must manage the bifurcated carryforward periods meticulously. Credits generated before 2022 benefit from a 15-year carryforward period, while those generated after 2021 are limited to 10 years.4 Proper segregation and application of these periods on Form 308 (Parts 8 and 9) are essential to mitigate the risk of forfeiting expired credits during an ADOR audit.
- Strategic Evaluation of Refund vs. Carryforward: The decision to seek a partial refund (75% cash) must be thoroughly evaluated against the long-term tax implications of carrying forward the full nonrefundable credit (100% value). Electing the refund, while providing immediate liquidity (subject to the ACA’s annual cap and certification), irrevocably eliminates the ability to carry forward any unused credit from that tax year.13 This trade-off requires a sophisticated comparison of the present value of cash flow versus the projected future value of tax offsets.
The following table summarizes the strategic implications of the credit disposition election:
Arizona R&D Credit Disposition Options
| Credit Disposition | Key Rules and Limitations | Impact on Future Tax Years |
| Nonrefundable (Tax Offset) | Used dollar-for-dollar against current AZ tax liability. | Unused credit may be carried forward for 10 or 15 years, depending on the generation date.4 |
| Partial Refund (75% Cash) | Restricted to small businesses ($\le 150$ employees, eVerify compliance) and subject to ACA certification and annual statewide cap ($10M).11 | If a refund is received for the current year, no carryover of the credit is available from that specific tax year.4 |
Are you eligible?
Why choose us?
Pass an Audit?
What is the R&D Tax Credit?
The Research & Experimentation Tax Credit (or R&D Tax Credit), is a general business tax credit under Internal Revenue Code section 41 for companies that incur research and development (R&D) costs in the United States. The credits are a tax incentive for performing qualified research in the United States, resulting in a credit to a tax return. For the first three years of R&D claims, 6% of the total qualified research expenses (QRE) form the gross credit. In the 4th year of claims and beyond, a base amount is calculated, and an adjusted expense line is multiplied times 14%. Click here to learn more.
Never miss a deadline again
Stay up to date on IRS processes
Discover R&D in your industry
R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services
Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.
If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.
R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services
creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.
Our Fees
Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/
Choose your state
