Fixed-Base Percentage
"The Fixed-Base Percentage is a historical ratio of R&D spending to Gross Receipts that sets the performance baseline a company must exceed to qualify for the R&D Tax Credit."
To understand the Arizona R&D Tax Credit (modeled after Federal IRC § 41), one must understand the "Base Amount." The Fixed-Base Percentage (FBP) is the critical multiplier used to calculate this Base Amount.
In essence, the state of Arizona does not reward you simply for spending money on research. It rewards you for increasing your research intensity relative to your historical performance. The lower your FBP, the easier it is to qualify for credits.
1984-1988
Standard Historical Base Period
16% Cap
Maximum allowable Fixed-Base Percentage
Low is Good
A lower % means a lower threshold to claim credits
🧮 Interactive Analyzer: The Calculation Flow
Adjust the values below to see how historical spending impacts credit availability. This simulation assumes an "Established Company" (non-startup).
Step 1: Historical Performance (1984-1988)
Step 2: Current Year Activity
Visualizing the "Base Amount" Hurdle
The Base Amount is the calculated threshold. You only get credit for QREs that exceed this amount (or 50% of current QREs, whichever is higher).
Application of Law & State Guidance
How the Arizona Department of Revenue (ADOR) applies the Fixed-Base Percentage logic varies significantly based on the age of the company.
The "1984-1988" Rule
For companies that had both Gross Receipts and Qualified Research Expenses during the period of January 1, 1984, through December 31, 1988, the calculation is straightforward.
- Formula: (Aggregate QREs '84-'88) ÷ (Aggregate Gross Receipts '84-'88).
- Maximum: The percentage cannot exceed 16%.
- Rounding: Round to the nearest 1/100th of 1% (e.g., 4.25%).
- Arizona Specifics: Arizona conforms to the definition of QREs found in IRC § 41, but taxpayers must use Arizona Form 308 to calculate the credit.
The "Start-up" Provisions
If a company did not have QREs and Receipts in the 84-88 period (or had fewer than 3 years of such activity), it is defined as a Start-up. The Fixed-Base Percentage is assigned by statute for the first 5 tax years, then phases in actual data.
| Tax Year with QREs | Fixed-Base Percentage |
|---|---|
| Years 1 - 5 | Fixed at 3% |
| Year 6 | 1/6 of (Agg QRE / Agg Receipts) for Years 4-5 |
| Year 7 | 1/3 of (Agg QRE / Agg Receipts) for Years 5-6 |
| Year 8 | 1/2 of (Agg QRE / Agg Receipts) for Years 5-7 |
| Year 9 | 2/3 of (Agg QRE / Agg Receipts) for Years 5-8 |
| Year 10 | 5/6 of (Agg QRE / Agg Receipts) for Years 5-9 |
| Year 11+ | Actual Ratio based on selected prior years |
Key Takeaways
- ➜ The Base Amount cannot be less than 50% of the current year's QREs. This is the "Minimum Base Amount" rule.
- ➜ Arizona follows the Regular Credit method. The Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) uses different logic entirely.
- ➜ Documentation of 1984-1988 records is mandatory. If records are lost, the IRS and Arizona may deem the FBP to be zero, but recent court cases often force a maximum cap or reconstruction.
Why It Matters
The Fixed-Base Percentage determines the "barrier to entry" for the credit. A company with a historically high R&D spend (high FBP) must spend significantly more today to generate a credit compared to a company with a low historical FBP.
References
- • IRC § 41(c)(3): Federal Definition.
- • A.R.S. § 43-1168: Arizona R&D Credit Statute.
- • Arizona Form 308: Calculation Form.
Strategic Compliance and Calculation: The Fixed-Base Percentage (FBP) in the Arizona R&D Tax Credit Landscape
I. Executive Summary: The Fixed-Base Percentage Defined and Its Strategic Importance
The Fixed-Base Percentage (FBP) is a static, historical metric that measures a company’s prior research intensity relative to its gross receipts during a fixed statutory period. It functions as the critical mechanism used to calculate the minimum level of research spending a company must exceed before earning the Arizona R&D income tax credit.
The FBP is central to the traditional (regular) method of calculating the nonrefundable Arizona R&D tax credit (A.R.S. § 43-1168).1 This methodology requires taxpayers to determine their “base amount,” which acts as a threshold. The credit is then calculated only on the “excess qualified research expenses” (Excess QREs) that surpass this base amount, thereby ensuring that the incentive rewards only incremental increases in research activities conducted within Arizona.3
Detailed Analysis of FBP’s Strategic Impact
The financial importance of the FBP cannot be overstated, as it is the permanent anchor against which all future R&D spending is measured. The calculation methodology multiplies the FBP—a percentage determined by decades-old data—by the Average Annual Gross Receipts (AAGR) of the most recent four taxable years to determine the Base Amount.4
Because the AAGR typically represents a large and often growing figure for established, successful companies, even a difference of one-tenth of one percent in the FBP can translate into hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars in Base Amount variation. A higher Base Amount results in lower Excess QREs, directly reducing the available tax credit, which is currently tiered at 24% and 15%.3 Therefore, meticulous diligence in accurately establishing and defending the lowest legally permissible FBP is paramount, as this calculation is essentially permanent and has a magnified, compounding effect on credit generation for decades.
II. Statutory Context and Arizona’s Adoption of the Incremental Credit
A. The Philosophy of Incremental R&D Investment (IRC § 41 Basis)
The Arizona R&D credit statute (A.R.S. § 43-1168) explicitly defers to and incorporates the methodology set forth in 26 U.S. Code § 41 (the federal Credit for Increasing Research Activities).3 The foundational premise of both the federal and state credits is that incentives should only be provided for research spending that increases beyond a historical average.
The Fixed-Base Percentage calculation establishes this historical average. For established taxpayers, the FBP is fundamentally defined as the percentage which the aggregate qualified research expenses (QREs) of the taxpayer for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1983, and before January 1, 1989, is of the aggregate gross receipts (GR) of the taxpayer for those same taxable years.6 This five-year period creates a static, fixed historical reference point regardless of when the calculation is performed.
The federal statute also imposes a significant structural constraint: in no event shall the fixed-base percentage exceed 16 percent (0.1600).6 This cap prevents companies that historically spent an extremely high percentage of their revenue on R&D during the base period from having a prohibitively high Base Amount in later, potentially lower-intensity years.
B. A.R.S. § 43-1168: Localized Application and State Modifications
Arizona’s credit adheres strictly to the federal framework but imposes a crucial localization mandate. The Arizona Department of Revenue (ADOR) guidance clarifies that while the structure and formulas are identical to the federal approach, taxpayers must substitute the federal aggregate amounts with Arizona qualified research expense and Arizona gross receipts amounts.9
This localization requirement is highly consequential for multi-state firms. It mandates that a company must reconstruct its books to determine not just its total QREs and Gross Receipts during the 1984–1988 base period, but specifically the amounts that were attributable and sourced to Arizona. The federal rules require that gross receipts for any taxable year be reduced by returns and allowances made during the taxable year.4 Arizona extends this principle to the localized calculation.5
The administrative complexity inherent in this requirement—reconstructing and defending decades-old state apportionment data—is a significant compliance challenge. If a taxpayer cannot accurately source their QREs and Gross Receipts to Arizona for the 1984–1988 period, they may be effectively precluded from using the standard FBP calculation. In such scenarios, the taxpayer may be forced to default to the “start-up” company rules for determining the FBP, regardless of their operational history at the federal level, which can result in a disadvantageous base calculation if they were already mature companies by the 1990s.
Successfully calculating the FBP and the resulting Base Amount allows the company to calculate its credit on the Excess QREs. The credit rates are highly attractive, particularly before the statutory sunset: A credit of 24% is applied to the first $2.5 million of Excess QREs, and 15% is applied to any Excess QREs exceeding the $2.5 million threshold.3
III. Core Mechanics of the Fixed-Base Percentage (FBP) Calculation
A. Calculating the FBP for Established Taxpayers
The FBP represents a static ratio and is calculated only once, unless the taxpayer’s status changes (e.g., through entry into a controlled group or merger) or if they are transitioning out of the start-up phase.
- Formula Inputs: The FBP is calculated by dividing the aggregate Arizona QREs for the base period (1984–1988) by the aggregate Arizona Gross Receipts for the same period.7
- Maximum Constraint: The calculated percentage is subject to the federal cap adopted by Arizona, ensuring the FBP does not exceed 16 percent (0.1600).6
- Precision and Rounding: ADOR instructions for Form 308 emphasize the need for precision, mandating that the resulting percentage must be rounded to the nearest one ten-thousandth of one percent (four decimal places).10 For example, an FBP calculation yielding 0.045678 must be rounded to 0.0457. This administrative requirement ensures computational consistency across all claimants.
B. Determining the Base Amount (Current Year Threshold)
The Base Amount is the numerical threshold that must be surpassed by current QREs to generate a credit. It is determined by multiplying the static FBP by a dynamic representation of the company’s recent size.
- The Formula: The Base Amount is calculated as the product of the Fixed-Base Percentage and the Average Annual Gross Receipts (AAGR) for the four taxable years immediately preceding the credit year.4
$$\text{Base Amount} = \text{FBP} \times \text{AAGR}$$ - AAGR Determination: The AAGR is the arithmetic average of the taxpayer’s Arizona Gross Receipts for the four taxable years immediately before the year in which the credit is claimed.12 This dynamic four-year look-back scales the Base Amount based on recent revenue fluctuation.
- Handling Irregular Periods: ADOR guidance references IRC §§ 41(c)(3) and 41(f)(4) for situations involving short taxable years or de minimis amounts of gross receipts or QREs. This ensures that amounts may be annualized or disregarded as necessary to prevent calculation distortions, maintaining the structural integrity of the base determination.10
C. The Mandatory 50% Floor Rule
A critical limitation on the Base Amount calculation is the mandatory 50% floor rule, which ensures that the credit remains truly incremental, even for companies with highly favorable historical data.
The Base Amount calculated via the $\text{FBP} \times \text{AAGR}$ formula must not be less than 50% of the current year’s Arizona Qualified Research Expenses (QREs).12
The functional effect of this constraint is to set a minimum Base Amount threshold. If the traditional FBP calculation yields a Base Amount that is below half of the current year’s research spending, the taxpayer must instead use 50% of the current QREs as the Base Amount.12
This mechanism effectively acts as a buffer against excessive credit generation (a windfall benefit). It restrains the credit benefit for companies that experience a sudden, massive surge in QREs without corresponding historical research intensity. By placing a limit on the maximum Excess QREs to 50% of current spending, this rule ultimately favors sustained, steady research growth rather than sporadic, one-off major expenditures. In practical terms, this places a ceiling on the maximum incremental credit achievable under the regular method, as the Base Amount must always consume at least 50% of the current year’s QREs, thereby limiting the credit to a maximum of 50% of the QREs (before applying the tiered rates).
IV. The Comprehensive Fixed-Base Percentage Rules for Arizona Start-Up Companies
Arizona strictly adheres to the federal phase-in rules for companies designated as “start-ups.” A taxpayer is classified as a start-up if they had both Arizona Gross Receipts and Arizona QREs either (1) for the first time in a taxable year beginning after December 31, 1983, or (2) for fewer than three taxable years beginning after 1983 and before 1989.9
The FBP for start-up companies evolves through a three-phase system over the company’s first ten years of research activity, designed to transition the base from a low statutory default to a fixed rate based on the company’s established research intensity.
A. Phase 1: The Initial Favorable Rate (Years 1 through 5)
For the first five taxable years for which a start-up company reports Arizona QREs, the Fixed-Base Percentage is set at a fixed, statutory rate of 3.00% (0.0300).5 This intentionally low FBP maximizes the initial incremental credit during the formative years when R&D spending may be high relative to overall revenue, providing a strong incentive for nascent research enterprises.
B. Phase 2: The Transitional Phase-In (Years 6 through 10)
This transitional phase is the most analytically complex, as the FBP shifts from a statutory rate to a calculated, weighted ratio based on the company’s accumulating research history. The calculation for each year is inextricably linked to the previous years’ QRE and Gross Receipt data, requiring meticulous tracking from Year 4 onward.
The calculation method for the FBP during this period is fractional, utilizing specific aggregations of QREs and Gross Receipts from preceding years:
Table: Arizona Start-Up Company Fixed-Base Percentage Phase-In Schedule
| Taxable Year of QREs | FBP Calculation Formula | Max FBP | Citations |
| Years 1 through 5 | 3.00% (Statutory Default) | N/A | 5 |
| Year 6 | $\frac{\text{Agg. QREs (Years 4-5)}}{\text{Agg. GR (Years 4-5)}} \times \frac{1}{6}$ | 16% | 14 |
| Year 7 | $\frac{\text{Agg. QREs (Years 5-6)}}{\text{Agg. GR (Years 5-6)}} \times \frac{1}{3}$ | 16% | 14 |
| Year 8 | $\frac{\text{Agg. QREs (Years 5-7)}}{\text{Agg. GR (Years 5-7)}} \times \frac{1}{2}$ | 16% | 8 |
| Year 9 | $\frac{\text{Agg. QREs (Years 5-8)}}{\text{Agg. GR (Years 5-8)}} \times \frac{2}{3}$ | 16% | 15 |
| Year 10 | $\frac{\text{Agg. QREs (Years 5-9)}}{\text{Agg. GR (Years 5-9)}} \times \frac{5}{6}$ | 16% | 8 |
The fractional weighting (increasing from $1/6$ to $5/6$) increases annually, reflecting the government’s diminishing concession regarding the company’s initial lack of a base period.
A critical nuance of this phase is the interconnectedness of data. For example, QREs and Gross Receipts from Year 5 are included in the calculation of FBP for Years 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10.14 This means that the financial profile of Year 5 (the last year under the statutory 3% FBP) has an amplified, lasting impact on the FBP determined during the subsequent phase-in period. Taxpayers engaging in significant, non-recurring gross receipt events (like selling non-research assets) during these years must consider how that revenue influx will lower the QRE-to-GR ratio, potentially securing a more advantageous long-term FBP. Conversely, a sharp, temporary spike in QREs without revenue growth during this window could increase the permanent FBP substantially, reducing future credit benefits.
C. Phase 3: Stabilization (Years 11 and Beyond)
Starting in the 11th taxable year for which the company has QREs, the FBP becomes fixed. The company is granted the ability to perform an elective look-back. The FBP is determined by the percentage resulting from the aggregate QREs and Gross Receipts for any 5 consecutive taxable years selected by the taxpayer from among Years 5 through 10.8
This provision creates a crucial strategic planning opportunity. Taxpayers should conduct detailed historical modeling to identify and select the specific 5-year window within the eligible period that yields the lowest ratio of QREs to Gross Receipts. Securing the lowest possible FBP at this stage ensures the highest Base Amount threshold for all subsequent years.
V. ADOR Guidance: Base Amount Modifiers and the Alternative Simplified Credit
A. The Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) Election
To accommodate companies that prefer a simpler, dynamic base calculation, Arizona allows taxpayers to elect the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC).5 The ASC entirely bypasses the traditional FBP framework and the historical 1984–1988 data requirements.
The ASC Base Amount is calculated as 50% of the taxpayer’s average Arizona QREs for the three taxable years immediately preceding the credit year.5 If a company does not have QREs for each of the prior three years, it may not qualify for the ASC, though the base for the first year of the ASC election is generally zero.17
While the ASC simplifies compliance, it introduces a dynamic risk. Unlike the fixed FBP of the traditional method, the ASC base is recalculated annually and changes based on recent QRE history. For companies with rapidly declining R&D spending, the ASC may generate a higher Base Amount than the FBP method because the three-year average might still be high relative to the current year’s QREs. Taxpayers must understand that the ASC election, once made, is generally irrevocable without ADOR approval.5
B. Compliance Procedures and Documentation
The administration of the nonrefundable R&D tax credit is handled by the ADOR via Arizona Form 308.18 The agency also administers the additional credit for basic research payments made to Arizona universities, although this requires a preliminary certification from the Arizona Commerce Authority (ACA).19
The computational requirements for Form 308 emphasize meticulous accuracy, specifically requiring the fixed-base percentage to be rounded off to the nearest one ten-thousandth of one percent (four decimal places).11
A key structural feature across both calculation methods is the inherent limitation imposed by the Base Amount floor. For the traditional method, the Base Amount must be at least 50% of the current QREs.12 For the ASC method, the Base is 50% of the three-year average QREs.5 When a high-growth company’s current QREs are substantially higher than their four-year average AAGR (traditional method) or their three-year average QREs (ASC method), both models converge to severely restrict the incremental benefit to approximately 50% of the current research investment. This structural parity reinforces the state’s legislative intent to tightly control the definition of “incremental” research during rapid growth cycles, regardless of the calculation method chosen.
VI. Illustrative Examples: FBP, Base Amount, and Excess QREs
The following examples demonstrate how the FBP is utilized to calculate the Base Amount, and how the mandatory 50% floor often dictates the final credit calculation for successful firms.
A. Example 1: Calculation for an Established Arizona Manufacturer (Traditional Method)
A mature manufacturing company, “Alpha Corp,” has established its FBP based on its historical Arizona activity.
Scenario Data (Taxable Year 2025):
| Metric | Value | Source |
| Agg. AZ QREs (1984–1988) | $15,000,000 | FBP Determination |
| Agg. AZ Gross Receipts (1984–1988) | $150,000,000 | FBP Determination |
| Current Year QREs (2025) | $10,000,000 | Credit Year Data |
| AAGR (2021–2024 Average AZ GR) | $250,000,000 | Base Amount Determination |
Step 1: Calculate the Fixed-Base Percentage (FBP):
$$\text{FBP} = \frac{\text{Agg. AZ QREs}}{\text{Agg. AZ GR}} = \frac{\$15,000,000}{\$150,000,000} = 0.1000 \text{ (10.00%)}$$
- Note: Since 10.00% is below the 16% cap, the calculated FBP is 10.00%.6
Step 2: Calculate the Base Amount using the FBP $\times$ AAGR formula:
$$\text{Base Amount}_{\text{Calculated}} = \text{FBP} \times \text{AAGR} = 0.1000 \times \$250,000,000 = \$25,000,000$$
Step 3: Determine the Mandatory 50% Floor:
The Base Amount must be at least 50% of the Current Year QREs.12
$$\text{Base Amount}_{\text{Floor}} = 0.50 \times \text{Current Year QREs} = 0.50 \times \$10,000,000 = \$5,000,000$$
Step 4: Select the Base Amount:
The Base Amount used for the credit calculation is the greater of the calculated amount or the 50% floor.12
In this case, the calculated Base Amount ($25,000,000) is greater than the floor ($5,000,000).
- Conclusion of Calculation: Alpha Corp’s Base Amount is $25,000,000.
- Result: Current QREs ($10,000,000) are less than the Base Amount ($25,000,000). Alpha Corp generates $0 in Excess QREs and therefore qualifies for $0 credit.
Self-Correction Example (for illustration of the 50% Floor Override):
If Alpha Corp’s AAGR was only $50,000,000, the $\text{Base Amount}_{\text{Calculated}}$ would be $0.1000 \times \$50,000,000 = \$5,000,000$. Since this exactly matches the 50% floor ($0.50 \times \$10,000,000 = \$5,000,000$), the result remains the same. The 50% floor is highly impactful when the historical FBP is very low (e.g., if FBP was 1.00%, the calculated base would be only $500,000, and the floor of $5,000,000 would apply, substantially reducing the potential credit).
B. Example 2: Calculation for an Arizona Start-Up (Year 7 Phase-In)
“Beta Innovations” is claiming the credit in its 7th taxable year since inception (2025).
Scenario Data (Taxable Year 2025):
| Metric | Value | Used For FBP (Years 5-6) |
| AZ QREs, Year 5 (2023) | $2,000,000 | $2,000,000 |
| AZ GR, Year 5 (2023) | $15,000,000 | $15,000,000 |
| AZ QREs, Year 6 (2024) | $3,000,000 | $3,000,000 |
| AZ GR, Year 6 (2024) | $20,000,000 | $20,000,000 |
| Current Year QREs (2025) | $4,000,000 | N/A |
| AAGR (Years 3-6 average AZ GR) | $16,000,000 | N/A |
Step 1: Calculate the Aggregate QREs and GR for the phase-in period (Years 5 and 6):
$$\text{Agg. QREs (Years 5-6)} = \$2,000,000 + \$3,000,000 = \$5,000,000$$
$$\text{Agg. GR (Years 5-6)} = \$15,000,000 + \$20,000,000 = \$35,000,000$$
Step 2: Calculate the FBP for Year 7 using the specific phase-in formula:
The Year 7 formula requires multiplying the aggregate QRE/GR ratio by $1/3$.14
$$\text{FBP} = \frac{\text{Agg. QREs (Years 5-6)}}{\text{Agg. GR (Years 5-6)}} \times \frac{1}{3}$$
$$\text{FBP} = \frac{\$5,000,000}{\$35,000,000} \times \frac{1}{3} \approx 0.142857 \times 0.333333 \approx 0.047619$$
Rounding to four decimal places, the FBP is 4.7619% (0.0476).11
Step 3: Calculate the Base Amount using the FBP $\times$ AAGR formula:
$$\text{Base Amount}_{\text{Calculated}} = 0.047619 \times \$16,000,000 \approx \$761,904$$
Step 4: Determine the Mandatory 50% Floor:
$$\text{Base Amount}_{\text{Floor}} = 0.50 \times \text{Current Year QREs} = 0.50 \times \$4,000,000 = \$2,000,000$$
Step 5: Select the Base Amount:
The Base Amount used is the greater of the calculated amount ($761,904) or the floor ($2,000,000). The 50% floor applies.
Base Amount = $2,000,000.
Step 6: Calculate Excess QREs and the Credit:
$$\text{Excess QREs} = \text{Current QREs} – \text{Base Amount}$$
$$\text{Excess QREs} = \$4,000,000 – \$2,000,000 = \$2,000,000$$
Since this amount is below the $2.5 million threshold, the credit is calculated at the 24% rate (assuming pre-2031 tax year).3
$$\text{Tax Credit} = 0.24 \times \$2,000,000 = \mathbf{\$480,000}$$
This example demonstrates that even with the complexity of the start-up phase-in FBP, the final Base Amount for a growing company is often determined entirely by the 50% floor rule.
VII. Legislative Context and Strategic Planning
A. The Statutory Sunset and Rate Decoupling
The financial value derived from the FBP calculation is directly tied to the Arizona R&D credit rates, which are subject to a statutory sunset scheduled for December 31, 2030. Arizona Revised Statutes § 43-1168 outlines a tiered reduction in the credit rate structure thereafter.3
Table: Arizona R&D Tax Credit Tiered Rates Based on Excess QREs
| Excess QRE Amount | Credit Rate (Pre-Dec 31, 2030) | Credit Rate (Post-Dec 31, 2030) | Credit Value Reduction |
| $\leq$ $2,500,000 | 24% | 20% | 4 percentage points |
| > $2,500,000 | 15% | 11% | 4 percentage points |
For taxable years beginning before December 31, 2030, the credit provides 24% on the first $2.5 million of excess expenses, plus 15% of any amount exceeding that threshold.2 After December 31, 2030, these rates drop to 20% and 11%, respectively.3
The impending rate reduction amplifies the time-value of money generated by an effective FBP calculation today. An accurate, low FBP established now maximizes the Excess QREs, capturing the current premium rates (24% and 15%). The same permanent FBP calculation used post-2030 will yield only 20% and 11% rates. This legislative structure creates a strong imperative for businesses to accelerate planned research expenditures before the 2031 transition to maximize the value of their incremental research investments.
B. Refundability and Administrative Oversight
The FBP calculation determines the total nonrefundable credit, which is administered by the ADOR.2 However, Arizona offers a unique partial refund mechanism for qualified small businesses.
The Arizona Commerce Authority (ACA) administers the refundable tax credit program (A.R.S. § 41-1507).2 A company must qualify for the nonrefundable credit and employ less than 150 full-time employees to be eligible for the refund.2 Qualified small businesses can apply for a partial refund of up to 75% of their excess credit amount, with a cap of $100,000 in a single tax year.22
The refundable credit program is subject to a strict annual statewide cap of $5 million.5 Applications are typically processed on a first-come, first-served basis.21 In recent years, demand for the refundable portion has exceeded the available pool; for instance, taxpayers requested $6,759,095 in refund applications for the 2022 tax year, demonstrating significant competition for the capped funds.22
VIII. Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations
The Fixed-Base Percentage (FBP) is not merely an accounting entry but the defining historical metric that determines the long-term effectiveness of the Arizona R&D tax credit. Its calculation, governed by the adoption of IRC § 41 and modified by Arizona-specific sourcing rules, dictates the incremental investment that must be exceeded to access the state’s generous tiered credit rates. The complexity of the FBP methodology—particularly the strict application of Arizona sourcing for the 1984–1988 base period, the phased calculation for start-ups, and the mandatory 50% minimum QRE floor—requires specialized compliance expertise.
Key Strategic Recommendations:
- Historical Data Verification and Defense: Established multi-state taxpayers must prioritize the verification and, if necessary, the reconstruction of Arizona Gross Receipts and QREs for the 1984–1988 base period. The inability to substantiate Arizona sourcing for these historical figures may force the company into adopting the start-up phase-in rules, potentially resulting in a higher, less favorable Base Amount than intended.
- Growth Strategy Modeling: Companies experiencing rapid growth in QREs must model both the traditional FBP method and the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) annually. The mandated 50% floor on the Base Amount often overrides a favorable FBP calculation for high-growth firms, requiring a detailed comparison of the FBP $\times$ AAGR calculation versus the 50% of current QREs threshold to accurately project credit benefits.
- Start-Up Phase Planning and Election: Start-up companies must meticulously track and document QREs and Gross Receipts from Year 4 through Year 10. Strategic planning must be conducted before Year 11 to analyze all eligible 5-consecutive-year windows between Years 5 and 10, ensuring the final, permanent FBP election locks in the lowest possible percentage for decades of future calculations.
Accelerated Investment to Maximize Current Rates: Due to the scheduled four-percentage-point decrease in credit rates across both tiers beginning in 2031, there is a substantial financial incentive to maximize qualified research expenditures between the present and December 31, 2030. Capturing the highest possible amount of Excess QREs at the 24% and 15% incentive tiers offers a superior return on investment compared to post-2030 spending.
Are you eligible?
Why choose us?
Pass an Audit?
What is the R&D Tax Credit?
The Research & Experimentation Tax Credit (or R&D Tax Credit), is a general business tax credit under Internal Revenue Code section 41 for companies that incur research and development (R&D) costs in the United States. The credits are a tax incentive for performing qualified research in the United States, resulting in a credit to a tax return. For the first three years of R&D claims, 6% of the total qualified research expenses (QRE) form the gross credit. In the 4th year of claims and beyond, a base amount is calculated, and an adjusted expense line is multiplied times 14%. Click here to learn more.
Never miss a deadline again
Stay up to date on IRS processes
Discover R&D in your industry
R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services
Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.
If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.
R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services
creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.
Our Fees
Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/
Choose your state
