Nonrefundable R&D Tax Credit
"A financial incentive that reduces your Arizona income tax liability dollar-for-dollar down to zero, but does not result in a cash refund."
Instead of a check from the state, unused credits are banked (carried forward) for up to 15 years to offset future taxes.
Impact Analysis Simulator
This tool demonstrates how the Arizona R&D credit functions in a real-world scenario. Enter your estimated Qualified Research Expenses (QRE) and Tax Liability to see how the credit is calculated, how it caps at your liability, and how the "Nonrefundable" portion builds up your carryforward bank for future years.
🧮 Input Parameters
Wages, supplies, & contract research.
Total state tax owed before credits.
Calculation Breakdown
5-Year Projection: Utilization vs. Carryforward
Assuming constant QRE and Tax Liability for demonstration.
Deep Dive: Guidance & Statutes
Essential context from the Arizona Department of Revenue (ADOR).
A.R.S. § 43-1168 (Corporate) & § 43-1074.01 (Individual)
These statutes govern the credit for increased research activities. The law stipulates that the credit is based on the excess of qualified research expenses for the taxable year over a "base amount" (usually related to previous years' spending).
- Rate Structure: 24% for expenses up to $2.5 million; 15% for expenses exceeding $2.5 million.
- University Research: If research is conducted via an Arizona university, the credit increases to 30% (shared between taxpayer and university).
- Carryforward: Specifically allows a 15-year carryforward period for unused nonrefundable credits (A.R.S. § 43-1168(D)).
The Arizona Nonrefundable Research and Development Tax Credit: A Comprehensive Analysis
The Arizona Nonrefundable Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credit is a state-level fiscal incentive that allows businesses to reduce their income tax liability dollar-for-dollar based on qualified research expenses incurred within Arizona, with the distinctive feature that any credit amount exceeding the current year’s tax liability is carried forward to future years rather than being issued as an immediate cash refund.
1. Executive Overview and Strategic Importance
The landscape of corporate taxation is a complex ecosystem of obligations and incentives, but few instruments are as powerful or as misunderstood as the Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credit. In Arizona, this credit serves as a cornerstone of the state’s economic development strategy, designed to attract and retain high-technology industries, aerospace manufacturers, and bioscience innovators. For the sophisticated taxpayer, understanding the nuances of the nonrefundable aspect of this credit is not merely a compliance exercise—it is a critical component of long-term financial planning and capital allocation.
While the allure of a “refundable” credit—where the state cuts a check for the excess—often captures the imagination of small business owners and startup founders, the nonrefundable credit remains the primary engine of tax relief for mature, profitable enterprises operating in the Grand Canyon State. The nonrefundable credit is an “incremental” incentive, meaning it rewards the growth of research activities rather than the status quo. It effectively subsidizes the risk inherent in innovation by allowing the state to share in the cost of development, provided the research is conducted locally.
The strategic importance of this credit has evolved significantly over the last three decades. Enacted in 1994, the credit was designed to decouple Arizona’s innovation economy from a reliance on real estate and tourism. Today, with the state hosting major semiconductor fabrication plants and a burgeoning electric vehicle sector, the nonrefundable R&D credit is a material line item on the balance sheets of the state’s largest employers. However, the path to claiming and maximizing this benefit is fraught with statutory complexities, rigorous documentation requirements, and a rapidly shifting legislative environment that demands constant vigilance from tax directors and CFOs.
This report provides an exhaustive analysis of the Arizona Nonrefundable R&D Tax Credit. It moves beyond the surface-level summaries to explore the deep mechanics of the statute, the interplay with federal tax reform, the strategic “fork in the road” between refundable and nonrefundable elections, and the practical realities of audit defense in 2025.
2. The Nature of “Nonrefundable” in Arizona Tax Law
To master the application of this credit, one must first deconstruct the term “nonrefundable.” In the lexicon of the Arizona Department of Revenue (ADOR), the distinction between refundable and nonrefundable credits creates two entirely different asset classes for a corporation.1
2.1 The Financial Mechanic
A nonrefundable credit operates as a ceiling on tax liability. It can reduce a taxpayer’s Arizona corporate income tax to zero, but it cannot drive the liability below zero to generate a negative tax (i.e., a refund payment).1
For example, consider a mid-sized aerospace component manufacturer in Tucson:
- Arizona Tax Liability: $150,000
- Available R&D Credit: $400,000
Under the nonrefundable rules, the corporation applies $150,000 of the credit to wipe out its tax bill. The remaining $250,000 is not lost, nor is it paid out. Instead, it transforms into a deferred tax asset known as a “carryforward”.3 This asset sits on the books, available to offset future tax liabilities for a specific statutory period. This mechanism aligns the incentive with the state’s goal: it rewards companies that are profitable and paying taxes, thereby encouraging sustainable business models rather than subsidizing perpetual cash-burn operations.
2.2 The Carryforward Evolution
The value of a nonrefundable credit is inextricably linked to its shelf life. If a company cannot generate enough taxable income to use the credit before it expires, the asset becomes worthless—a scenario known in the industry as having credits “die on the vine.”
Arizona law regarding carryforward periods has recently undergone a significant contraction, creating a two-tiered system based on the vintage of the credit:
| Credit Generation Period | Carryforward Duration | Statutory Reference |
| Tax Years Beginning Before Jan 1, 2022 | 15 Years | A.R.S. § 43-1168(A)(3) 3 |
| Tax Years Beginning After Dec 31, 2021 | 10 Years | A.R.S. § 43-1168(A)(3) 4 |
| University Basic Research Credit | 5 Years | A.R.S. § 43-1168(D) 5 |
This reduction from 15 years to 10 years for new credits significantly alters the valuation of these assets for companies with cyclical profitability.3 A biotech firm with a 12-year path to profitability might previously have banked on using its early-stage nonrefundable credits. Under the post-2021 regime, those credits may expire before they can be monetized, forcing such companies to reconsider the refundable election (discussed in Section 6) or accelerate income recognition strategies.
2.3 Nonrefundable vs. Refundable: The Valuation Gap
The distinction also impacts the “street value” of the credit in the eyes of tax planners.
- Nonrefundable Value: Theoretically $1.00 per dollar of credit, but discounted by the time value of money (TVM) based on when the credit is actually utilized against tax.
- Refundable Value: Capped at 75% of the face value (due to the statutory waiver requirement) but realizes immediate cash.6
Thus, the “Nonrefundable” status is the default, premium-value option for companies with sufficient tax appetite, while the “Refundable” status is a discounted liquidity option for those without.
3. The Statutory Framework: A.R.S. § 43-1168
The authority for the Arizona R&D tax credit is derived from Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 43-1168 for corporations and § 43-1074.01 for individuals.7 These statutes do not exist in a vacuum; they are tethered to the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) § 41, but with crucial state-specific modifications.
3.1 The Federal Connection and State Divergence
Arizona is a “conformity” state, meaning it generally adopts the federal definition of “Qualified Research Expenses” (QREs). If an activity qualifies for the federal R&D credit, it generally qualifies for the Arizona credit, provided the activity takes place within Arizona’s borders.6
This geographic sourcing is the single most common point of friction in audits. A software company with engineers in Phoenix and developers in Bangalore can claim federal credits for the Phoenix team (and potentially some contract research), but for the Arizona nonrefundable credit, only the QREs physically incurred in Arizona are eligible. This requires rigorous payroll segmentation and location tracking.9
3.2 The Tiered Rate Structure
Unlike the federal credit, which typically offers a flat rate (20% regular or 14% ASC), Arizona employs a progressive, tiered rate structure that is remarkably generous for small to mid-sized projects.
For Taxable Years Through December 31, 2030:
- Tier 1: 24% of the first $2.5 million in excess QREs.
- Tier 2: 15% of any excess QREs above $2.5 million.6
This structure effectively creates a “blended rate” that decreases as spending scales, but the initial 24% kicker is one of the highest statutory rates in the nation. It serves as a powerful magnet for startups and mid-market firms, incentivizing them to locate their R&D hubs in the state.
Future Rate Reduction (Post-2030):
Forward-looking tax departments must note that the statute contains a built-in sunset of these premium rates. Starting January 1, 2031:
- Tier 1: Drops to 20% (from 24%).
- Tier 2: Drops to 11% (from 15%).7
This scheduled reduction is part of long-term fiscal balancing by the legislature, but for the next five years (2025–2030), the 24/15 split remains the law of the land.
3.3 The “Excess” Mechanism
The Arizona credit, like the federal “Regular Credit,” is incremental. It rewards the increase in spending over a “Base Amount.” This prevents companies from claiming credits for essentially maintaining their status quo operations.
The Base Amount Calculation:
$$Base\ Amount = Fixed\ Base\ Percentage \times Average\ Annual\ Gross\ Receipts\ (Prior\ 4\ Years)$$
The Fixed-Base Percentage is a historical ratio of the company’s aggregate QREs to aggregate gross receipts during a specific startup period (often the first five years of the company’s existence having gross receipts and QREs).11
- The Floor: The Base Amount cannot be less than 50% of the current year’s QREs.11
- The Implication: Because of this 50% floor, the effective credit rate is often applied to only half of the actual spending for mature companies. For a company spending $10M, the base amount is likely $5M (the floor), leaving $5M in “excess” eligible for the credit.
4. Operational Methodologies: Regular vs. ASC
In recent years, Arizona modernized its statute to allow taxpayers a choice in how they calculate the credit, mirroring the federal election between the Regular Credit and the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC).
4.1 The Regular Method
The Regular Method utilizes the tiered rates (24%/15%) described above. It is generally most beneficial for:
- Startups with low base amounts.
- Companies with high R&D intensity relative to their gross receipts history.
- Firms that have maintained the historical records necessary to substantiate their “Fixed-Base Percentage” (which can date back to the 1980s for legacy firms).11
4.2 The Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC)
Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2021, Arizona taxpayers can elect the ASC method.3 This was a massive relief for taxpayers who lacked the decades-old records required for the Regular Method.
The Mechanics:
The ASC is calculated based on the excess of current-year QREs over 50% of the average QREs for the three preceding taxable years.
- State Conformity: To use the Arizona ASC, the taxpayer must usually have elected the ASC on their federal return.3
- Rate Differential: While the federal ASC rate is 14%, Arizona applies its own rates to the ASC base. The benefit is largely administrative simplicity—documentation is only required for the “lookback period” of three years rather than the company’s inception.
Strategic Insight: For mature companies with stagnant R&D budgets, the ASC often yields a better result than the Regular Method, which punishes stagnation. By moving to a 3-year rolling average, the ASC smoothes out the volatility and allows credits to be claimed even if spending is flat, provided it exceeds 50% of the recent average.
5. The University Basic Research Credit: A Hidden Asset
Beyond the primary R&D credit, Arizona offers a supplementary incentive that is often overlooked: the University Research and Development Income Tax Credit.13 This is a separate, additional nonrefundable credit for payments made to Arizona’s state universities (ASU, NAU, U of A) for basic research.
5.1 Structure and Value
- Value: 10% of the excess “basic research payments” over a qualified organization base period amount.7
- Stackable: This credit is taken in addition to the regular R&D credit. A payment to ASU for a research project can generate both the regular 24% credit (as a contract research expense at 65% or 75% inclusion) AND this 10% kicker.6
5.2 Strict Limitations
Unlike the general credit, the University Credit has tighter restrictions:
- Certification: It requires a Letter of Approval from the ADOR/ACA. It is not self-executing.15
- Cap: It falls under a specific aggregate cap (shared with other programs) of $10 million annually.7
- Carryforward: Unused University credits carry forward for only 5 years, not the 10 or 15 years allowed for the general credit.7
- Nonrefundable Only: There is no refundable option for this credit, even for small businesses.11
Table 1: Comparison of General vs. University R&D Credits
| Feature | General R&D Credit | University Basic Research Credit |
| Credit Rate | 24% / 15% (Tiered) | 10% (Flat) |
| Basis | Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) | Basic Research Payments to Universities |
| Refundable Option | Yes (75% for small biz, capped) | No (Strictly nonrefundable) |
| Carryforward | 10 or 15 Years | 5 Years |
| Pre-Certification | No (unless refund sought) | Yes (Always required) |
6. The Refundable Election: Risk and Reward
For qualified small businesses (QSBs), the statute offers a “fork in the road”: remain nonrefundable or apply for a partial refund. While this report focuses on the nonrefundable aspect, understanding why a company would choose nonrefundable status despite qualifying for a refund is vital.6
6.1 The “Haircut” and the Cap
The refundable option allows a QSB (fewer than 150 FTEs) to convert its excess credit into cash, but with two major penalties:
- The 25% Forfeit: The refund is limited to 75% of the excess credit. The remaining 25% is waived—it vanishes. It cannot be carried forward.11
- The $5 Million Cap: The state allocates only $5 million annually for all refundable R&D claims. This cap is historically oversubscribed on the very first day of the application window (January 2nd or the first business day of the year).9
6.2 The Case for Staying Nonrefundable
Many savvy CFOs of profitable or near-profitable QSBs choose to forgo the refund election.
- Full Value Retention: By keeping the credit nonrefundable, they retain 100% of the asset value to offset future taxes, rather than taking a 25% haircut.
- Certainty: The refundable process is a lottery. If a company applies and the cap is exhausted, they revert to nonrefundable status anyway, but they have incurred additional administrative costs to apply.18
- Audit Profile: Refund claims typically trigger a higher likelihood of audit or review by the ACA/ADOR compared to standard nonrefundable carryforwards reported on the return.19
7. Strategic Impact of Federal Legislation (2025)
The interplay between federal tax changes and Arizona’s conformity is a critical, evolving area of law. As of December 2025, the impact of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” (OBBB)—signed federally in July 2025—looms large over state tax planning.
7.1 The Section 174 Amortization Crisis
Prior to 2022, companies could immediately deduct R&D expenses (IRC § 174). The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) changed this, requiring 5-year amortization (15 for foreign) starting in 2022. This artificially inflated federal taxable income, and by extension, Arizona taxable income (since Arizona starts with Federal AGI).20
For a company with $1M in R&D expenses:
- Pre-2022: $1M deduction = Lower Taxable Income.
- 2022-2024: $100k deduction (half-year convention on 5-year) = $900k higher Taxable Income.
This created a “phantom income” tax liability that the R&D credit was desperately needed to offset.
7.2 The 2025 Restoration and Conformity Lag
The OBBB restored immediate expensing for domestic R&D retroactive to 2022.20 While this is a massive win federally, Arizona’s conformity is not automatic. Arizona conforms to the IRC as of a specific date (usually January 1st of the current year).
- The Conflict: As of December 2025, if Arizona has not passed a specific “conformity bill” adopting the OBBB provisions, state taxpayers are in a limbo.21 They may file federal returns expensing the costs, but may have to add them back for Arizona purposes until the state legislature aligns its statutes.
- Operational Headache: This mismatch requires dual sets of depreciation/amortization schedules—one for the IRS (expensed) and one for ADOR (amortized)—until conformity is enacted.
7.3 The Failed Reinvestment Bill (SB 1562)
In 2023, Arizona legislators attempted to provide an alternative for companies sitting on massive piles of nonrefundable credits. Senate Bill 1562 proposed a “reinvestment” program where companies could redeem unused credits for 75 cents on the dollar if they reinvested the cash into water infrastructure or university partnerships.22
- The Result: The bill failed (Vote: 10-19-1).23
- The Lesson: The failure of this bill signals that the state is currently unwilling to monetize the large deferred tax assets of major corporations. The nonrefundable credit remains strictly a tax-offset tool, not a transferable or redeemable asset. This reinforces the need for accurate forecasting: do not generate more credits than you can reasonably use in 10-15 years.
8. Compliance: Forms, Ordering Rules, and Documentation
The administrative burden for the nonrefundable credit is substantial. Errors in ordering rules or documentation are common triggers for ADOR adjustments.
8.1 The Form Ecosystem
- Arizona Form 308: This is the primary engine. It calculates the QREs, the base amount, the tiered credit, and the carryforward.
- Arizona Form 300: This is the “traffic cop.” It summarizes all nonrefundable corporate credits and dictates the order in which they are applied.25
- Arizona Form 346: Used strictly for the University Basic Research Credit.
- Arizona Form 301: Used by individual owners of pass-through entities to claim their share of the credit flow-through.26
8.2 Ordering Rules
Arizona applies strict ordering rules when a taxpayer holds multiple types of credits. Generally, credits are utilized in an order that prioritizes those most likely to expire or those without carryforward provisions.
- Statutory Order: Nonrefundable credits without carryforward -> Nonrefundable credits with carryforward -> Refundable credits.
- Vintage Tracking: Within the R&D credit bucket (Form 308), taxpayers must use a FIFO (First-In, First-Out) method. Credits from 2022 (expiring 2032) must be used before credits from 2025 (expiring 2035). Form 300 Part 6 is specifically designed to track these “vintages”.15
8.3 Documentation Best Practices
Under audit, the ADOR will request “contemporaneous documentation” to substantiate the QREs. The “Cohen Rule” (estimates) is generally frowned upon; precise project accounting is expected.
- Nexus Proof: A common audit finding involves disallowing wages for employees who travel. If a Phoenix engineer spends 30% of their time at a client site in California, 30% of their QREs should theoretically be excluded. Payroll records must be corroborated with travel logs.10
- Project Lists: A narrative description of each R&D project, detailing the “technical uncertainty” and the “process of experimentation,” is mandatory. Generic descriptions like “Software Update 2.0” are insufficient; descriptions must highlight the algorithmic challenges or engineering hurdles.6
9. Comprehensive Case Study: The Lifecycle of a Credit
To illustrate the mechanics of the nonrefundable credit, let us examine Helios Optics Inc., a hypothetical C-Corporation in Flagstaff manufacturing laser guidance systems.
Phase 1: The Startup Years (2022-2023)
- 2022: Helios spends $1M on R&D. Revenue is $0.
- Base Amount: $0 (Start-up rules).
- Excess: $1M.
- Credit: $1M * 24% = $240,000.
- Tax Liability: $0 (Loss).
- Result: $240,000 carried forward (Expiring 2032).
- 2023: Helios spends $2M on R&D. Revenue is $500k.
- Credit: $2M * 24% = $480,000.
- Tax Liability: $0.
- Result: Total Carryforward = $720,000.
Phase 2: The Growth Phase (2024)
- 2024: Helios spends $4M on R&D. Revenue jumps to $10M.
- Base Amount (50% min rule): $2M.
- Excess: $2M.
- Credit: $2M * 24% = $480,000.
- Total Available Credit: $720k (Carryforward) + $480k (Current) = $1.2M.
- Tax Liability: $250,000.
- Utilization: Helios uses $250,000 of the 2022 vintage credit (FIFO rule).
- Remaining Carryforward:
- 2022 Vintage: $240k – $250k = Used fully (-$10k balance moves to next vintage).
- Wait, 2022 was only $240k. So, $240k of 2022 used. $10k of 2023 used.
- Remaining: $470k (2023) + $480k (2024) = $950,000 carried forward.
Phase 3: The Cap Limitation (Refund Scenario)
In 2025, Helios considers applying for a refund to get cash for a facility expansion. They have <150 employees.
- Excess Credit: $480,000.
- Tax Liability: $100,000.
- Net Excess: $380,000.
- Refund Calculation: 75% of $380,000 = $285,000.
- The Cost: The remaining 25% ($95,000) is waived forever.
- Decision: Helios realizes they will be highly profitable in 2026. They decline the refund to keep the full $380,000 as a carryforward, saving $95,000 in future tax value.
10. Statistical Trends and Market Analysis
Analysis of Arizona Department of Revenue annual reports reveals significant trends in the usage of the R&D credit.28
- Dominance of the Corporate Credit: In Tax Year 2022, corporations claimed $160.3 million in nonrefundable R&D credits, a massive 97.4% increase from previous years. This dwarfs the individual (pass-through) claims of roughly $12.9 million.28
- Refund Cap Saturation: The data consistently shows the refundable credit hovering near its caps ($5M total), with demand far outstripping supply. In 2022, taxpayers requested over $6.7 million in refunds against the $5 million cap, proving the “lottery” nature of the refund.9
- Carryforward Bloat: There is nearly $1.9 billion in unused corporate R&D credit carryforwards sitting on the books of Arizona companies.30 This staggering figure underscores the difficulty companies face in utilizing the credits they generate, further validating the failed attempt of SB 1562 to allow reinvestment/redemption.
11. Conclusion
The Arizona Nonrefundable R&D Tax Credit is a double-edged sword. On one side, it offers one of the most generous rate structures in the United States, providing a 24% subsidy on the first $2.5 million of incremental research spending. This makes Arizona a highly competitive jurisdiction for engineering and technology firms.
On the other side, the nonrefundable nature of the credit creates a “liquidity trap” for pre-revenue companies and a “carryforward cliff” for mature firms. With the carryforward period reduced to 10 years and the reinvestment legislation dead on arrival, companies must be more strategic than ever. They must model their tax liabilities a decade out, optimize their base amount calculations annually, and rigorously defend their claims with audit-ready documentation.
For the Arizona business leader, the nonrefundable credit is not just a line on a tax return—it is a strategic asset that, managed correctly, lowers the effective cost of innovation and fuels the next generation of growth.
Data Appendix
Table 2: Arizona Corporate R&D Credit Utilization Statistics (2020-2022)
| Tax Year | Total Corporate Credit Used/Refunded | Year-Over-Year Change | Refundable Portion Utilization |
| 2020 | $72,997,168 | -4.3% | $3,243,248 (Capped) |
| 2021 | $81,225,000 (Est) | +11.2% | $3,339,161 (Capped) |
| 2022 | $160,361,125 | +97.4% | ~$5,000,000 (Fully Capped) |
Source: Derived from Arizona Department of Revenue Annual Reports 28
Table 3: Documentation Checklist for Arizona R&D Claims
| Document Type | Purpose | Critical Data Points |
| Payroll Records | Wage Qualification | AZ Location Codes, Job Titles, % of Time on R&D |
| General Ledger | Supply Substantiation | Invoice Dates, Vendor Names, “Consumed in R&D” proof |
| Project Narratives | Technical Qualification | “Uncertainty” statement, “Experimentation” steps |
| Contracts | Contractor Eligibility | “Rights” retention clauses, “Risk” assessment clauses |
| Base Period Records | Incremental Calculation | Gross Receipts (4 prior years), Fixed Base data (1984-88 if applicable) |
Are you eligible?
Why choose us?
Pass an Audit?
What is the R&D Tax Credit?
The Research & Experimentation Tax Credit (or R&D Tax Credit), is a general business tax credit under Internal Revenue Code section 41 for companies that incur research and development (R&D) costs in the United States. The credits are a tax incentive for performing qualified research in the United States, resulting in a credit to a tax return. For the first three years of R&D claims, 6% of the total qualified research expenses (QRE) form the gross credit. In the 4th year of claims and beyond, a base amount is calculated, and an adjusted expense line is multiplied times 14%. Click here to learn more.
Never miss a deadline again
Stay up to date on IRS processes
Discover R&D in your industry
R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services
Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.
If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.
R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services
creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.
Our Fees
Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/
Choose your state
