The Exclusive Focus on Labor: A Deep Analysis of Qualified R&D Salaries under the Arkansas Tax Credit Regime

I. Executive Summary: The Definition and Economic Context

Qualified R&D Salaries (QRS) are defined as the taxable W-2 wages, including bonuses, paid to employees for directly engaging in, supervising, or supporting qualified research activities within Arkansas.1 These salaries serve as the central, and often exclusive, measure for calculating the valuable in-house state Research and Development (R&D) tax credits.

The Arkansas R&D tax credit regime, established under Ark. Code Ann. § 15-4-2708 et seq., hinges almost entirely on the accurate identification and apportionment of qualified labor expenses. Unlike the federal structure defined by Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41, which includes wages, supplies, and contract research expenses 3, Arkansas’s in-house credit programs diverge significantly by excluding costs related to supplies, equipment, land, and buildings from the Qualified Research Expenditure (QRE) base.4 This structural limitation mandates that businesses focus their compliance and documentation efforts intensely on personnel costs, as they represent the highest leverage opportunity for maximizing the state credit.

A. Contextual Overview of the Arkansas R&D Tax Credit Landscape

The State of Arkansas utilizes its R&D incentives to achieve specific economic development goals by supporting different types of entities and research programs.4 The incentives are categorized to target three main groups: established firms with ongoing R&D, younger “targeted” firms, and emerging firms focused on strategic research areas.4

The unique significance of QRS within this system cannot be overstated. Since non-wage expenditures—such as the purchase of supplies, land, construction or renovation costs, and production machinery—are specifically excluded from the definition of qualified research expenditures for the in-house credits 5, the compliance approach must pivot entirely away from typical federal R&D compliance practices. Companies cannot rely on documenting material costs or depreciation. Instead, the high-value of the credit is tied directly to labor expenses. This structural constraint forces corporate tax departments to abandon simplified accounting records for R&D purchases and instead implement rigorous, defensible, contemporaneous time-tracking methodologies to accurately capture and allocate employee activity. Personnel documentation thus becomes the single most critical element of the Arkansas R&D tax credit claim.

The various programs available offer different rates (20% or 33%) and differing features regarding transferability and caps, requiring applicants to carefully select and structure their claims based on their business lifecycle and immediate financial needs.4

II. Statutory and Regulatory Foundations of Qualified R&D Salaries

To properly define and calculate QRS for the Arkansas credit, it is necessary to first understand the federal definition of qualified wages and services, as the state law largely relies on this foundation, with specific Arkansas modifications.

A. The Federal Baseline: IRC Section 41 Alignment and the Definition of Wages

Arkansas Qualified R&D Salaries must first satisfy the criteria for in-house research expenses established under IRC Section 41.3 Section 41 defines “in-house research expenses” to include wages paid or incurred to an employee for qualified services performed.1

1. Defining Taxable Wages

The term “wages” for R&D tax credit purposes is defined by IRC Section 3401(a), which restricts the definition to amounts subject to federal withholding.1

• Standard Inclusions: QRS encompasses all taxable W-2 compensation reported to the employee. This includes regular base salary, specific performance bonuses, and realized income derived from the exercise of stock options, provided these amounts are included in taxable wages.2
• Standard Exclusions: Non-taxable income must be strictly excluded, even if the funds were paid or incurred for research services performed by an employee. Common exclusions include non-taxable fringe benefits, employer contributions to 401(k) plans, health insurance premiums, and other non-taxed income.2

B. Defining “Qualified Services” (The Three Categories)

Wages qualify as QRS only if they are paid for services that consist of engaging in qualified research.1 This engagement must fall into one of three legally recognized categories of services performed by employees:

1. Direct Research: This category covers the personnel directly executing the qualified experimental activities. This involves the hands-on performance of testing, evaluation, modification, development, or design.1
2. Direct Supervision: This includes the immediate, first-line management of personnel performing direct research. To qualify, managers must be actively involved in the technical direction and execution of the research activities, coordinating elements such as testing and quality control.7 General management, budgeting, or administrative supervision is excluded.
3. Direct Support: These services are those performed for the benefit of, and integral and essential to, the qualified research process. Examples include the maintenance of specialized research equipment, preparation of technical documentation required by the research team, or laboratory clean-up specific to the research effort.7

C. Arkansas Statutory Divergence: Fringe Benefits and QRE Scope

The most significant compliance hurdle in Arkansas stems from the state’s narrow definition of qualified research expenditures compared to the federal baseline.

1. The Narrow QRE Base and Geographical Constraint

For the general In-House R&D credit (20%), the QRE base is limited explicitly to QRS.4 The statute specifically excludes non-wage expenditures such as the purchase of supplies, land, production machinery, equipment purchases or rehabilitation, and construction or renovation of buildings.5 This confirms that QRS is the singular, essential component for the vast majority of state in-house credit claims.

Furthermore, Arkansas places a geographical limitation on the activity: in-house research, whether experimental, clinical, or laboratory activities, qualifies only to the extent that the activity is physically conducted in Arkansas.4 This geographical constraint is particularly restrictive for multi-state employers, as only the specific time an employee spends performing QRS within Arkansas state lines is eligible. For personnel who frequently travel or live near state borders, this requirement mandates that taxpayers implement time documentation systems capable of accurately capturing and allocating employee activity by physical location.

2. The Targeted Business Fringe Benefit Nuance

A critical, high-leverage distinction exists for businesses claiming the 33% credit (either as a Targeted Business or for Strategic Research). The Arkansas statute provides a potential expansion of the eligible QRE base to include: “taxable wages paid and usual fringe benefits specific to research activities of employees”.5

The standard practice is to exclude non-taxable fringe benefits like employer health insurance contributions or 401(k) matching.6 However, the statutory inclusion of “usual fringe benefits specific to research activities” suggests an eligible expansion beyond the standard W-2 definition. Since non-taxable items that are company-wide (like general health plans) are generally not “specific to research,” this language opens the door to including specialized benefits provided exclusively to the R&D team due to their research role. Examples could include specialized educational assistance or fees paid for highly technical conferences required for the R&D project. Taxpayers must be prepared to defend the specific link between the benefit and the qualified research activity, demonstrating that the benefit is not merely a component of general compensation.

The following table summarizes the general eligibility of compensation elements:

Table 2: Eligible and Ineligible Compensation for Arkansas QRS

III. The Substantially All Rule: Calculation and Apportionment of QRS

The determination of the claimable QRS hinges on the “Substantially All” rule, which dictates how employee time is apportioned and claimed as qualified expense.

A. Operationalizing the 80% Threshold

Arkansas adopts the federal “Substantially All” rule, which functions as a critical tax multiplier. If an employee spends 80% or more of their working hours performing qualified services, 100% of their eligible wages may be claimed as Qualified Research Expenses.10 For example, an engineer who spends 85% of their time testing new materials may claim 100% of their salary, even though 15% of their time was spent on non-R&D activities.11

B. Apportionment Below 80%

If the employee’s documented time on qualified services falls below the 80% threshold, the Substantially All bonus is lost, and only the actual percentage of time documented as performing QRS is claimable.10 The high leverage of the 80% threshold means that the difference between documenting 79% time and 80% time for a high-wage employee can result in a significant loss of potential credit value.

The Substantially All rule creates a stark binary:

Table 3: The Substantially All Rule (80% Apportionment)

C. Categorizing Services for Time Tracking

Accurate classification of employee time is essential for utilizing the 80% bonus and maintaining compliance. Taxpayers must rigorously distinguish between Qualified Time and Non-Qualified Time.

• Qualified Time: Activities must meet the four-part test for qualified research and fall into one of the three service categories: Direct Research, Direct Supervision, or Direct Support.1
• Non-Qualified Time: This includes general and administrative tasks (e.g., HR, general budgeting), routine data collection, routine quality control, or activities related to commercial production after the successful completion of the experimentation process.5

The risk of misclassification is particularly high for “Direct Supervision” and “Direct Support” roles. Engineers involved in Direct Research often have clearly defined roles, but managers (Direct Supervision) frequently oversee both R&D and non-R&D operations, such as general manufacturing oversight or overhead tasks.8 If a manager’s general organizational duties dilute their R&D focus below 80%, the potential for claiming 100% of their salary is eliminated, and only the actual percentage can be claimed. Strategic tax compliance, therefore, mandates that management structures be carefully reviewed to ensure R&D managers either meet the 80% threshold or that general overhead tasks are assigned to non-R&D personnel.

D. Documentation Requirements

Robust documentation is mandatory to support the time allocated to QRS. While the Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration (DFA) does not mandate a specific federal form (like the superseded AR1075 which addressed tuition deduction, not R&D wages 13), contemporaneous records are critical for substantiating claims, especially during an audit. These records typically include:

• Detailed, project-specific time logs or entries, often gathered through time tracking software.
• Functional interviews and organizational charts demonstrating the allocation of time, which are particularly necessary for supervisory and support roles that frequently blend qualified and non-qualified tasks.7

Due to the Arkansas exclusion of supplies and equipment, a greater percentage of total project costs will inherently be allocated to QRS compared to claims under the federal IRC Section 41. If a project costs $\$1$ million, with $\$500,000$ in salaries and $\$500,000$ in supplies, the federal QRE base is $\$1$ million, but the Arkansas QRE base is only $\$500,000$ (QRS only). This concentration means that accurate salary apportionment carries a magnified financial weight for the Arkansas credit, necessitating flawless QRS documentation and tracking protocols.

IV. Arkansas State Revenue Guidance and Program Compliance

The administration of the Arkansas R&D programs is unique because it is managed by the Arkansas Economic Development Commission (AEDC), which acts as the governing body responsible for certifying and approving the credits.12

A. Administrative Authority and Certification

The decision to grant R&D tax credits in Arkansas is discretionary, resting with the AEDC Executive Director.12 A taxpayer must obtain certification from the AEDC prior to claiming benefits. This requires securing a Financial Incentive Agreement with the Commission, which dictates the five-year term of the incentive.4

The application for this agreement must include a comprehensive Project Plan.12 This plan serves as the basis for the Commission’s approval, clearly identifying the project’s intent, specific planned expenditures (QRS), the start and end dates of the project, and an estimate of total project costs.12 Failure to establish an approved, detailed Project Plan and secure the Financial Incentive Agreement prior to incurring expenses risks invalidating the subsequent credit claim.

B. Key Differences Among In-House Credit Programs

Taxpayers must select the R&D credit program that best aligns with their operational and financial profile, as the selection dictates the credit rate, the calculation methodology, and the potential transferability of the credit. The incentives for in-house research fall into three main types, which generally may not be combined with one another, but may be combined with incentives for university research.4

The disparity in credit transferability and caps dictates the optimal incentive path based on the business lifecycle. A mature, tax-liable company with high QRS (e.g., in excess of $\$500,000$) is generally best suited for the 20% incremental credit (Code 0023) because it carries no annual cap and directly offsets corporate income tax liability.12 Conversely, a younger start-up or technology enterprise that anticipates having little or no immediate income tax liability, but requires operational funding, is best suited for the 33% Targeted Business credit (Code 0024). This program’s key feature is that the generated credit is transferable, meaning it can be sold one time within one year of issuance, providing critical liquidity.4 Any firm with substantial qualified wage expenses will find the 33% Strategic Value R&D credit highly restrictive due to its rigid $\$50,000$ annual maximum.5

C. DFA Reporting and Compliance Forms

The R&D credits are applied against the taxpayer’s Arkansas state income tax liability. Tax credits earned under these programs may be carried forward for nine years and can offset up to 100% of a business’s income tax liability in a given year.5

The credit is formally claimed through the Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration (DFA) using Form AR1100BIC, the Schedule of Business Incentive Credits.16 Corporations must use this form when claiming credits on their AR1100CT Corporation Income Tax Return.16 When completing the AR1100BIC, the taxpayer must select the specific Credit Type Code corresponding to the program for which they received AEDC certification: 0023, 0024, or 0025.16

D. Qualified Contractual Wages and University Research

The definition of qualified research expenditures explicitly includes wages paid to a full-time permanent employee or “contractual employee,” as defined in the Act, for performing qualified services.12 The inclusion of contractual employee wages requires rigorous vetting of 1099 workers engaged in R&D activities. This is essential to ensure that their remuneration meets the criteria of “qualified services” and that the underlying agreement structure satisfies the state’s intent, thereby mitigating the risk of audit disallowance based on misclassification.

Furthermore, specifically for Targeted Businesses claiming the 33% credit, the QREs can be expanded to include expenditures for wages and usual fringe benefits paid through contractual agreements, approved in writing by the director, with an Arkansas state college, university, or other Arkansas-based research organization.5 This specific allowance is intended to incentivize partnerships with local academic institutions.

V. Practical Application: Case Study and Example Calculation

To illustrate the application of the Substantially All rule and the calculation methodology, consider the following scenario:

A. Scenario Setup: ArkTech Labs

• Company: ArkTech Labs, a mid-sized technology firm operating entirely within Arkansas.
• Program Eligibility: ArkTech Labs qualifies as an Arkansas Targeted Business and has executed the necessary Financial Incentive Agreement with the AEDC for the 33% credit (Code 0024).
• Goal: Calculate the total claimable Qualified R&D Salaries (QRS) for the tax year.

The calculation must adhere strictly to the definition of taxable wages and properly apply the 80% Substantially All rule. In this example, standard non-taxable fringe benefits are excluded, as they are not deemed “specific to research activities.”

B. Data Analysis of Employee Wages and Time Allocation

The time allocation for key R&D personnel is analyzed below:

C. Final Credit Calculation and Limit Application

1. Total Claimable QRS Pool: $\$355,000$
2. Applicable Credit Rate (Targeted Business): 33% 4
3. Gross Tax Credit Calculation: $\$355,000 \times 33\% = \$117,150$
4. Credit Limit Check: Because ArkTech utilized the Targeted Business credit (Code 0024), there is no annual limit imposed.12 The $\$50,000$ cap only applies to the Strategic Value program.
5. Net Arkansas R&D Tax Credit: $\$117,150$ (Claimed on Form AR1100BIC, Code 0024).

The analysis reveals the high financial impact of the Substantially All rule. Manager Ms. D, earning $\$120,000$, only achieved 75% QRS time, falling short of the 80% threshold. By applying the actual percentage, ArkTech was only able to claim $\$90,000$ of her salary. Had Ms. D documented just 5% more qualified time (reaching 80%), the entire $\$120,000$ salary would have been claimable QRS. This failure to meet the threshold resulted in $\$30,000$ of lost claimable salary base $(\$120,000 \times (100\% – 75\%))$ for Ms. D alone. This loss, calculated at the 33% rate, represents $\$9,900$ in forgone tax credit. This demonstrates the necessity for compliance teams to monitor high-wage personnel nearing the 80% line throughout the year and implement organizational solutions to ensure they meet the critical threshold.

VI. Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

The Arkansas R&D tax credit is a powerful incentive, but its structure—which concentrates nearly all eligible expenditures on QRS—requires a highly disciplined and specialized compliance approach distinct from federal practices.

Taxpayers must recognize that successful claims are intrinsically tied to two core requirements: securing necessary discretionary pre-approval and implementing demonstrably rigorous time tracking.

A. Summary of Key Compliance Requirements

1. Federal Definition Alignment: Arkansas R&D salary claims are strictly tied to taxable W-2 compensation and the federal “qualified services” definition (Direct Research, Direct Supervision, Direct Support). Non-taxable fringe benefits are generally excluded.2
2. Pre-Approval Mandate: Mandatory pre-approval via a Financial Incentive Agreement, supported by a detailed Project Plan, is required by the AEDC.4
3. QRS Priority: QRS forms the dominant, and often exclusive, QRE base for state in-house credits, making detailed, contemporaneous time tracking documentation paramount.4
4. Geographical Restriction: All claimed research activities must be physically conducted within Arkansas.4

B. Strategic Recommendations for Maximizing QRS Claims

Based on the statutory framework and administrative requirements, businesses seeking to optimize their Arkansas R&D tax credit claims should adopt the following strategies:

• Proactive Program Selection: Before filing, evaluate the firm’s financial status and liquidity needs. Companies generating significant tax liability should prioritize the 20% incremental credit (Code 0023) due to its unlimited claim potential. Start-ups or young firms needing immediate capital should select the 33% Targeted Business credit (Code 0024) to leverage the ability to sell the credit for cash flow.4
• Rigorous Time Tracking Implementation: Invest in detailed, project-based time tracking systems capable of isolating the three categories of qualified services and accurately recording the time spent in Arkansas. Documentation efforts must be primarily focused on supporting the 80% threshold for high-wage personnel, as the loss of the Substantially All bonus constitutes the single largest source of potential credit erosion.
• Organizational Design: To ensure that high-value managerial salaries meet the 80% threshold, R&D supervisory roles should be organizationally structured to minimize general and administrative duties. By ring-fencing managers to technical direction and supervision, the firm secures the maximum QRS base for these expensive personnel.8
• Leveraging State Nuances: If claiming the 33% Targeted Business or Strategic Value credit, tax specialists should work to identify and document any “usual fringe benefits specific to research activities”.5 This requires detailed proof that the benefit is specialized and directly linked to the R&D function, thereby safely expanding the eligible QRS pool beyond the standard W-2 definition.

Compliance Documentation: Taxpayers must ensure the correct credit type code (0023, 0024, or 0025) is used on the DFA Form AR1100BIC, guaranteeing that the claim aligns perfectly with the initial AEDC certification and project plan to prevent audit discrepancies.16

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/