The Regulatory Role of the Arkansas Science and Technology Authority (ASTA) in State R&D Tax Incentives

I. Executive Summary: The Meaning of ASTA and R&D Incentives

The Arkansas Science and Technology Authority (ASTA) is now the principal division within the Arkansas Economic Development Commission (AEDC) that defines the state’s technological research priorities.

ASTA, working through the AEDC, administers Arkansas’s multi-tiered R&D tax credit framework, offering high-value income tax relief of up to 33% for certified incremental or strategically vital research expenditures.

Arkansas’s Research and Development (R&D) incentive programs are strategically structured to stimulate investment across three main areas: in-house corporate research, university-based partnerships, and R&D conducted by start-up or technology-based enterprises.1 These credits provide a significant financial mechanism for businesses, as they are permitted to offset up to 100% of a company’s annual state income tax liability.1 Furthermore, any unused tax credits possess a substantial utility, as they may be carried forward and claimed over the subsequent nine tax years from the date of issuance.1

The state employs a dual-agency administrative structure for these incentives. The AEDC, incorporating the functions of the former ASTA, is responsible for setting the policy direction, certifying the eligibility of the research activity, and entering into financial agreements with the applicant.1 In contrast, the state revenue office, the Department of Finance and Administration (DFA), oversees the actual utilization of the certified credit against the taxpayer’s income tax liability.4 This system operates under specific provisions of state law (Ark. Code Ann. § 15-4-2708 and related provisions in Title 26).3 Critically, the Arkansas R&D tax credit programs distinguish themselves from the federal IRC Section 41 credit by maintaining a far more restrictive definition of Qualified Research Expenditures (QREs), generally limiting eligible costs exclusively to wages and salaries paid for qualified research services.2

II. The Regulatory Landscape: ASTA’s Evolution and Enduring Authority

The role of the Arkansas Science and Technology Authority (ASTA) is fundamental to understanding the state’s approach to R&D investment, despite a significant structural reorganization that occurred several years ago.

A. From Independent Authority to AEDC Division: The Type II Transfer

The Arkansas Science and Technology Authority was originally established as an independent state agency by Act 859 of 1983.6 Its initial mandate was to provide leadership, direction, incentives, and technical assistance to enable Arkansas to capitalize on advanced science and technology.6 This founding legislation granted ASTA broad authority to develop programs, adopt rules, and manage resources.6

In a subsequent legislative restructuring, ASTA was subjected to a Type II transfer, integrating its operations and mission into the Division of Science and Technology of the Arkansas Economic Development Commission (AEDC).6 This move centralized the administration of science, technology, and commercialization programs under the AEDC umbrella, aiming to reduce redundancy and simplify the application process for businesses seeking funds.6 While the agency’s administrative functions were consolidated, its statutory mandate concerning research policy remains intact within the new division.

B. ASTA’s Enduring Role in Defining “Strategic Value”

The integration of ASTA into the AEDC has resulted in a structural arrangement where the policy-setting function of the authority retains critical oversight over the most generous state tax incentives. The 33% Strategic Value R&D credit is reserved for research conducted in fields deemed to have long-term economic or commercial value to the state.1

Crucially, the identification and approval of these “areas of strategic value” rest with the Board of Directors of the former Arkansas Science and Technology Authority.1 By granting the Board the exclusive right to define this strategic criterion, the state ensures that the highest-yield tax benefit—the 33% credit—is tightly managed and directed toward projects that align specifically with long-term, official state economic development objectives, rather than being broadly applied to general R&D activities.1 Consequently, for a business to access the superior 33% Strategic Value credit, it must align its research proposal closely with the specific criteria and priorities established and approved by the ASTA Board, underscoring the Board’s enduring importance as a strategic gatekeeper for capital allocation.

III. Core Arkansas R&D Tax Credit Programs: Rates and Features

Arkansas provides three primary, distinct R&D tax credit programs under state law, each differentiated by its incentive rate, calculation methodology, and specific focus.1 The state awards tax credits to eligible businesses for making certain qualified research expenditures, as well as for certain donations or sales below cost of new machinery and equipment to qualified research programs.8

The table below summarizes the three main income tax credit programs managed by the AEDC/ASTA Division:

Arkansas R&D Tax Credit Programs Summary

A. Program Deep Dive 1: In-House Research and Development (20% Credit)

This program is primarily intended as a discretionary tax incentive for eligible, mature companies that are performing ongoing in-house R&D within the state.2 The program requires the business to conduct research that qualifies under federal research and development tax credits before applying for the state incentive.1

The credit is allowed at a rate of 20% of qualified research expenditures.1 Crucially, this 20% rate is not applied to the company’s total QREs, but only to those expenditures that exceed the baseline expenditure established in the immediately preceding year.1 This incremental benefit is available for a period of five consecutive years.1 Administration of this credit is explicitly discretionary, offered at the direction of the AEDC Executive Director.1

B. Program Deep Dive 2: Strategic Value R&D (33% Credit)

This incentive targets qualifying businesses that invest either in in-house research in a defined area of strategic value or in a research and development project specifically offered by the Arkansas Science and Technology Authority.1 As defined previously, the research must be in fields identified by the ASTA Board as having long-term economic or commercial value.1

The income tax credit is equal to 33% of the qualified research expenditures incurred.1 While the rate is significantly higher than the general in-house credit, it is subject to a statutory limitation: the maximum tax credit that may be claimed by a taxpayer under this program is capped at $50,000 per tax year.1 This cap limits the total size of the project that can benefit from the full 33% rate, suggesting this incentive is designed to stimulate mid-sized, targeted strategic initiatives rather than massive, multi-million-dollar R&D efforts.

C. Program Deep Dive 3: University-Based Research Contracts (33% Credit)

Arkansas seeks to leverage the research capabilities of its academic institutions. An eligible business that contracts with one or more Arkansas colleges or universities to perform qualified research may receive an income tax credit equal to 33% of those qualified research expenditures.1 This program provides the highest non-capped rate for R&D collaboration, supporting both educational research program efforts and external business innovation.9

The state’s incentive structure assigns its most generous rates (33%) to these Strategic Value and University-Based initiatives. This strategic allocation of the highest credit percentage demonstrates a clear policy goal: the state prioritizes R&D that either directly feeds into pre-defined economic objectives (Strategic) or enhances the state’s educational research ecosystem and human capital development (University collaboration).

D. Tax Utilization Rules and Limitations

For all Arkansas R&D tax credits, the utilization rules are generous concerning corporate tax liability. The tax credits may be applied to offset up to 100% of a company’s annual state income tax liability.1 Moreover, the robust carryforward provision of nine years allows companies to utilize earned credits even if they are not immediately profitable.1

It should be noted that for general contributions, donations, or sales below cost related to qualified research programs at educational institutions, the total credit claimed for all qualified research expenditures, donations, and sales is limited to 50% of the taxpayer’s net tax liability after all other credits and reductions have been calculated.9

IV. Granular Definition of Qualified Research Expenditures (QREs)

The narrow definition of Qualified Research Expenditures (QREs) in Arkansas presents the most significant compliance challenge for businesses, as it starkly contrasts with the broad criteria used in the federal R&D tax credit (IRC § 41).

A. The Critical Distinction: State vs. Federal QRE Scope

While federal qualification is a mandatory prerequisite for seeking the 20% In-House credit, the state’s QRE definitions are substantially narrower than those found in the federal tax code.2 Arkansas utilizes the federal framework as a gatekeeper to establish the basic technical eligibility (e.g., the four-part test for qualified services and process of experimentation). However, the state then severely restricts the types of costs that actually generate the state tax credit. This creates an administrative expectation that taxpayers must meticulously track and segregate costs that meet the federal technical requirements but fail the specific Arkansas cost-type test.

B. Allowable Expenditures: Focus on Wages and Contractual Services

The Arkansas R&D credit is intentionally focused on stimulating human capital investment and labor.

For the core 20% In-House R&D Tax Credit Incentive Program, QREs are strictly limited to qualified R&D salaries.2 Supplies, equipment, and buildings do not qualify for this credit.2

A slightly broader, though still restrictive, definition applies to targeted businesses and strategic value research. Qualified research expenditures include in-house expenses for taxable wages paid to a full-time permanent employee, as well as wages and usual fringe benefits paid through contractual agreements with approved Arkansas-based research organizations, including state colleges or universities.1 This allowance for contractual services further emphasizes the goal of directing state funds toward specialized knowledge bases within Arkansas institutions.

C. Specific Exclusions (Supplies, Equipment, and Real Property)

The statutory exclusions are explicit and comprehensive, reinforcing the state’s focus on labor over capital. Activities and costs specifically excluded from the definition of qualified research that can generate the credit include 5:

1. The purchase of supplies.
2. The purchase of land.
3. The purchase or rehabilitation of production machinery and equipment.
4. The construction or renovation of buildings.
5. Any ordinary and necessary expenses of conducting business.

By excluding capital expenditures (such as equipment and buildings) and consumable supplies, the Arkansas policy signals that the incentive is solely designed to stimulate the employment of specialized researchers and engineers within the state. This strategy ensures the state maximizes its return on investment by tying the credit directly to job creation and payroll, thus contributing to the state’s income and employment tax bases, while limiting exposure to capital investment costs.

V. State Revenue Office (DFA) Guidance and Calculation Methodology

The utilization of R&D tax credits is governed by the Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration (DFA). Taxpayers must successfully navigate a two-stage process: certification by the AEDC/ASTA and claim utilization through the DFA.

A. Administrative Oversight: The Certification and Utilization Pipeline

The AEDC, acting through its Science and Technology Division, certifies the project’s eligibility, reviews the project plan 1, establishes the baseline expenditure, and ultimately issues the tax credit certificate(s).4

The DFA, specifically the Tax Credits/Special Refunds Section, then assumes responsibility for processing the claim against the taxpayer’s annual state income tax liability.4 The R&D incentive program is performance-based, meaning that recipients must meet requisite investment, payroll, or job requirements as specified in their agreements, which are subject to audit by the DFA prior to the disbursement of benefits.11 Taxpayers claiming the credit are required to attach a copy of the official tax credit certificate(s) or appropriate documentation received from the AEDC to their state tax return.4

B. Establishing the Incremental Baseline Expenditure

The 20% In-House credit program is calculated based on incremental qualified research expenditures.5 Establishing the initial baseline is a critical first step.

For a qualified business that is new to the incentives offered under Ark. Code Ann. § 15-4-2708, the initial baseline is defined as the amount of research conducted in Arkansas that was claimed for federal R&D tax credits during the most recent year.5 If the business did not claim any research conducted in the state for federal R&D tax credits during the most recent year, the base year amount is set to zero ($0).5

C. The Year-by-Year Incremental Calculation Rule (The 5-Year Step)

The calculation methodology for the 20% In-House credit requires QREs to exceed the expenditure level of the preceding year for the benefit to be realized. This approach significantly influences strategic R&D investment planning.

Scenario 1: New Claimant with Zero Prior Federal R&D Claims (Baseline = $0)

5

1. Year 1: All eligible expenditures qualify for the credit (Current QRE less a $0 baseline).
2. Year 2: The tax credit is calculated by subtracting the Year 1 QRE from the Year 2 QRE.
3. Years 3 through 5: The calculation continues incrementally, requiring the current year’s QRE to exceed the immediately preceding year’s QRE.

Scenario 2: Established Claimant with Prior Federal R&D Claims (Non-Zero Baseline)

5

1. Year 1: The credit is calculated by subtracting the established Baseline Amount from the Year 1 QRE.
2. Year 2: The credit is calculated by subtracting the Year 1 QRE from the Year 2 QRE.
3. Years 3 through 5: The calculation continues incrementally, requiring the current year’s QRE to exceed the immediately preceding year’s QRE.

The incremental calculation logic introduces significant financial risk. Since the calculation, after the initial year, is based on the difference between the current year’s expenditure and the prior year’s expenditure, a reduction in QREs in any year during the five-year period results in a zero-credit yield for that period. This structure necessitates sophisticated planning and continuous, year-over-year QRE growth to maximize the total five-year benefit.

D. DFA Compliance Requirements and Forms

Taxpayers must submit all necessary documentation to the DFA to claim the certified credits.

The principal form used by taxpayers to claim the R&D credit, along with other business incentives, is Form AR1000TC, the Schedule of Tax Credits and Business Incentive Credits.4 When filing Form AR1000TC, the taxpayer must attach the official tax credit certificate(s) issued by the AEDC.4 The DFA provides contact information for its Tax Credits/Special Refunds Section for specific guidance.4

VI. Practical Application Case Study: Calculating the Incremental In-House Credit

This case study illustrates the application of the 20% In-House R&D credit, demonstrating the incremental calculation and the consequences of fluctuating investment levels.

A. Scenario Setup and Assumptions

A mid-sized manufacturing company, TechCorp, operates an R&D facility in Fort Smith.11 TechCorp has been approved by the AEDC for the five-year, 20% In-House R&D Tax Credit. The company’s QREs consist solely of R&D taxable wages, consistent with Arkansas law.2

B. Calculation Walkthrough: Established Claimant

TechCorp claimed $500,000 in R&D wages for federal credit purposes in the most recent year prior to applying for the state incentive.

The results demonstrate the crucial nature of the incremental calculation:

1. Year 1: TechCorp successfully increased its QREs by $200,000 over the established baseline, earning $40,000.
2. Year 2: Despite still performing significant R&D, the QRE level of $650,000 failed to exceed the preceding year’s QRE of $700,000. Because the credit is based only on the positive increment, zero credit was earned.5
3. Year 3: QREs re-accelerated to $800,000, creating a $150,000 positive increment over the prior year’s QRE. This successfully generated a $30,000 credit.

C. Documentation Checklist for DFA Filing

To ensure compliance with the DFA, the taxpayer must provide documentation that reconciles both the AEDC’s eligibility certification and the DFA’s utilization requirements:

1. Certification Proof: The official R&D Tax Credit Certificate issued by the AEDC.4
2. Tax Forms: The completed state income tax return package, including the critical Form AR1000TC.4
3. QRE Verification: Detailed, auditable payroll records demonstrating that QREs are restricted only to R&D taxable wages, explicitly excluding non-qualifying costs such as supplies and equipment.2
4. Baseline Documentation: Records proving the federal R&D claim used to establish the initial baseline.5
5. Incremental Proof: An annual calculation worksheet that demonstrates the step-by-step subtraction of the preceding year’s QRE from the current year’s QRE for each year of the five-year incentive period.5

VII. Strategic Implications and Conclusion

A. Strategic Implications for Businesses

The structure of the Arkansas R&D tax incentive framework compels businesses to adopt specific strategies to maximize their benefit:

Maximize Human Capital Investment: Given the severe restriction of QREs to wages and salaries, companies must recognize that capital expenditures (equipment, land, buildings) will not generate state tax credits.2 Strategic investment should therefore prioritize the hiring of specialized Arkansas-based R&D personnel and the utilization of contractual research agreements with state universities over infrastructure expansion.

Pursue High-Yield Credits: Businesses should rigorously explore eligibility for the 33% programs (Strategic Value or University-Based). While the Strategic Value credit is capped annually at $50,000, it offers a superior rate applied to total qualified expenditures (up to the cap), providing more predictable and higher-yield tax relief for targeted projects compared to the volatility of the incremental 20% credit.1

Mitigate Incremental Risk: Companies relying on the 20% In-House credit must develop long-term financial forecasts that budget for consistent or increasing QRE spending year-over-year. As demonstrated in the case study, a decline in R&D wages results in a complete loss of the credit for that tax year, necessitating sophisticated investment management to maintain positive increments.5

B. Conclusion: A Dual-Focus Incentive Framework

The Arkansas R&D tax credit system, guided by the specialized policy function inherited from the former ASTA, is a strategic instrument designed to direct financial incentives towards specific economic goals. This framework maintains a dual focus: it offers highly generous, high-percentage credits (33%) for research that aligns with state-defined strategic and academic priorities, while providing a narrower, incrementally calculated incentive (20%) for general corporate R&D growth.1

Successfully navigating this system demands meticulous compliance, particularly in adhering to the highly restrictive, wage-centric definition of Qualified Research Expenditures and mastering the precise year-over-year incremental calculation rules enforced by the AEDC and audited by the DFA. Businesses that align their R&D spending with the state’s human capital objectives and manage their QRE growth strategically are uniquely positioned to leverage this incentive program to offset up to 100% of their annual state income tax liability.1

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/