Analysis of Bio-Based Products and Compliance for the Arkansas Research and Development Tax Credit

I. Executive Summary: Definition and Strategic Tax Context

A Bio-Based Product is a commercial or industrial item derived entirely or in significant part from renewable agricultural, marine, or forestry materials, explicitly excluding food, feed, or fuel.1 For the purpose of the Arkansas Research and Development (R&D) tax credit, research and development activities related to Bio-Based Products frequently qualify as an “Area of Strategic Value,” conferring eligibility for the state’s most substantial R&D incentive rate.3

The State of Arkansas utilizes this specialized definition to drive targeted economic growth, leveraging its strong foundational sectors, particularly agriculture and forestry.5 By linking high-value research activities concerning these materials to the highest available income tax credit—a 33% rate—the state effectively subsidizes the development of knowledge-based enterprises.3 This policy aims to stimulate local intellectual property generation and commercialization, transitioning traditional resource industries into advanced technology sectors. The strategic designation, approved by the Arkansas Science and Technology Authority (ASTA), provides this enhanced benefit, distinguishing it from the general 20% credit offered for incremental in-house research.3

II. Statutory and Regulatory Definition of Bio-Based Products

A. Foundational Federal Definition and USDA Mandate

The legal interpretation of a “Biobased Product” in Arkansas is inextricably linked to federal statute and the associated regulations promulgated by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). The primary reference for this definition is the U.S. Code, particularly sections outlining the criteria used in the USDA BioPreferred Program.7

Biobased products must be commercial or industrial products derived from renewable resources such as plants, and other agricultural, marine, and forestry materials.1 They are generally designed to serve as alternatives to products conventionally derived from petroleum.1 Critical to the definition is its scope, which explicitly includes forest products that meet specific biobased content requirements, irrespective of the product’s age or established market share.8 To date, the USDA has established minimum biobased content standards across 139 product categories, setting a high technical bar for compliance and certification.1

B. Arkansas State Adoption and Definitional Rigidity (ACA § 25-37-101)

Arkansas Code § 25-37-101 formally adopts the federal standard, defining a “Biobased product” as one “determined by the United States Secretary of Agriculture” to be a commercial or industrial product, composed “in whole or in significant part” of biological or renewable domestic agricultural, animal, marine, or forestry materials.2

This explicit statutory reliance on the USDA determination means the State of Arkansas has functionally outsourced the technical compliance standard to the federal regulatory structure.2 A taxpayer seeking to qualify research under this definition for the Arkansas R&D credit must first confirm that the product, or the material being researched, meets the criteria and content standards established by the USDA. This requirement minimizes the state’s regulatory burden but exposes the Arkansas tax incentive compliance process to any potential future shifts in federal biomass content standards or USDA certification requirements.

Key exclusions are maintained strictly under Arkansas law: Biobased products do not include food or feed.2 Furthermore, while a hypothetical example might suggest the creation of biofuels from agricultural waste falls under the category 7, the foundational USDA guidance explicitly excludes food, feed, or fuel from the definition of a Biobased Product.1 Consequently, R&D focused on producing standard biofuels would typically be ineligible under this specific definition, requiring the research to be qualified under another, more general, strategic research criterion. It is also important to note that the definition allows for the inclusion of intermediate ingredients or feedstocks used in manufacturing, ensuring that R&D activities focused on refining raw materials (e.g., isolating specific biopolymers) are eligible for the incentive.7

III. The Arkansas R&D Tax Credit Program and Strategic Value Qualification

The R&D tax credit program in Arkansas is administered primarily through the Arkansas Economic Development Commission (AEDC) and the Arkansas Science and Technology Authority (ASTA), which certify the research activity, and the Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration (DFA), which manages the tax filing compliance.9

A. Strategic Value and Targeted Business Qualification

Research pertaining to Bio-Based Products is typically categorized as either “Research and Development in an Area of Strategic Value” or, if conducted by a young firm, “In-House Research by a Targeted Business”.10 Both categories reflect the state’s commitment to fields having long-term economic or commercial value.3 Arkansas has a specialized concentration in agricultural feedstock and industrial biosciences, evidenced by a high location quotient of 1.47, highlighting the economic justification for this strategic designation.5

Qualifying research in these areas receives the highest credit rate offered by the state: 33% of qualified research expenditures (QREs).6 This incentive is provided for the first five (5) tax years following the business’s signing of a financial incentive agreement with the commission.11

B. Financial Limitations and Strategic Structuring

A critical limitation imposed on the Strategic Value R&D credit is the annual maximum benefit: the tax credit may not exceed $50,000 per taxpayer per tax year.3 This hard cap significantly affects the economic benefit for larger, well-capitalized firms. For instance, since the credit is 33%, the marginal tax benefit on qualified internal R&D expenditures ceases once the company exceeds approximately $151,515 in annual QREs (i.e., $\$151,515 \times 33\% \approx \$50,000$). This structure suggests that the legislative intent behind the Strategic Value credit is primarily to serve as a high-impact, seed funding mechanism for specialized R&D payroll in small and emerging high-technology firms, rather than as broad-based tax relief for major corporations.13

The law does, however, permit a strategy to mitigate the impact of the internal research cap: the 33% credit for in-house strategic research generally cannot be combined with other in-house R&D incentives, but it may be combined with incentives for research contracted with Arkansas colleges or universities.12 The University-Based Research and Development program also offers a 33% income tax credit for qualified research expenditures, and these expenses are potentially not subject to the $50,000 internal research cap.3 Strategic tax planning therefore dictates that a company with significant R&D budgets exceeding the internal cap should prioritize contracting additional research activities with local institutions to maximize the overall 33% incentive benefit.

IV. Qualified Research Expenditures (QREs) and Financial Constraints

A nuanced understanding of what constitutes a Qualified Research Expenditure (QRE) under Arkansas law is essential, as the state definition is significantly narrower than the federal IRC § 41 standard.

A. Narrow Definition of Arkansas QREs

A prerequisite for utilizing the Arkansas In-House R&D credits is that the company must already be participating in the Federal R&D program.12 However, Arkansas’s definition of QREs is highly restrictive, focusing almost exclusively on human capital costs.

Qualified research expenditures include only in-house expenses for taxable wages paid and usual fringe benefits specific to research activities of employees.15 The employee services that qualify are strictly defined as:

1. Engaging in the actual conduct of qualified research.
2. Engaging in the direct supervision (first-line management) of qualified research.
3. Engaging in the direct support of research activities (e.g., testing or data collection).12

Explicitly excluded from the Arkansas QRE definition are general administrative services or other services only indirectly beneficial to the research activity.12 Furthermore, unlike the federal credit, Arkansas state law strictly excludes the cost of supplies, equipment, and buildings from qualifying expenditures for this credit.12 This “salaries only” policy necessitates the taxpayer maintain meticulous internal records demonstrating precise time allocation for all personnel claiming the credit. This granular level of documentation, differentiating between eligible R&D functions and ineligible administrative or production functions, represents the primary source of audit exposure for the taxpayer with the DFA, as failure to properly allocate time will result in the disallowance of claimed wages.

B. Contractual Research and Credit Utilization

QREs can also include wages and fringe benefits paid through contractual agreements, provided these agreements are approved in writing by the director and involve a state college, an Arkansas state university, or another Arkansas-based research organization performing research for a targeted business.15 This provision supports contracts with universities for performing basic or applied research, allowing the taxpayer to utilize the 33% University-Based R&D tax credit.14

The credits earned offer favorable utilization parameters. The credit may be used to offset up to 100% of a company’s annual income tax liability.3 This is a powerful feature, as many state tax credits cap the offset at 50% of liability.17 Additionally, any unused income tax credit may be carried forward for a maximum period of nine (9) years.3 This nine-year carryforward is particularly crucial for Targeted Businesses and startups in the industrial bioscience sector 13, providing significant financial stability by allowing them to bank credits during years of pre-revenue or negative taxable income and monetize those credits once the R&D projects achieve commercial viability.

V. Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration (DFA) Compliance Guidance and Reporting

The DFA acts as the local state revenue office, responsible for the final acceptance and reconciliation of tax credit claims against income tax liability.9 However, the DFA’s role regarding R&D credits is predominantly procedural, relying entirely on the technical pre-certification process completed by the AEDC/ASTA.

A. Pre-Certification Process and Administrative Authority

The crucial step for any taxpayer claiming the Strategic Value R&D credit is obtaining certification from the economic development agencies. The taxpayer must submit an application and a project plan to the AEDC/ASTA, ideally 45 days prior to the company’s tax year end date, to allow sufficient time for review.12 The Board of Directors of the ASTA makes the final decision on granting the tax credits.20 Upon approval, the commission issues an official Certificate of Tax Credit.15

B. DFA Filing Requirements and Documentation

The most fundamental piece of compliance guidance issued by the revenue office is the requirement that the taxpayer must attach a copy of the Certificate of Tax Credit issued by the commission to the income tax return upon filing.15 Without this mandatory documentation, the DFA will reject the claim, as the state revenue office relies on the AEDC/ASTA Certificate to verify the eligibility and amount of the credit.

Corporate taxpayers must file the AR1100CT (Corporation Income Tax Return) and attach the AR1100BIC (Schedule of Business Incentive Credits).10 When claiming the Strategic Value credit for Bio-Based R&D, the taxpayer will generally utilize Credit Type Code 0025: In-House Research Area of Strategic Value Income Tax Credit on the AR1100BIC.10

The division of labor is clear: the AEDC/ASTA assesses and certifies whether the research activity constitutes Bio-Based R&D in an Area of Strategic Value and verifies the qualified wages.15 The DFA, conversely, focuses its compliance review on procedural adherence—ensuring the correct forms are filed and the legally required Certificate is attached.9 This distribution of responsibilities means the most substantial compliance risk for the taxpayer lies in the initial technical application and project qualification phase with AEDC/ASTA, and administrative coordination risk arises if the commission fails to issue the Certificate prior to the tax filing deadline.

VI. Case Study: Maximizing the Bio-Based R&D Tax Credit

To illustrate the application of the Arkansas R&D tax credit for Bio-Based Products, consider a high-growth startup operating within the state.

A. Scenario Setup: Bio-Plastic Film Development

Company: Bio-Polymer Solutions Inc. (BPS), an Arkansas-based Targeted Business developing biodegradable packaging film from agricultural starch, designed as a direct replacement for conventional polyethylene film. The product is certified by the USDA as biobased, and the research activity has been pre-approved by ASTA as an “Area of Strategic Value.” BPS is in Year 2 of its 5-year incentive agreement.12

Expenditures for Tax Year:

B. Credit Calculation and Application of Statutory Cap

The calculation must strictly observe the limitations on internal QREs.

1. Internal QREs: $290,000
2. Gross Calculated Credit (33%): $\$290,000 \times 0.33 = \$95,700$
3. Application of Statutory Cap: The maximum tax credit for In-House Research in an Area of Strategic Value is capped at $50,000 per tax year.11

• Allowable Tax Credit for Internal Research: $50,000

1. University Research Credit: The $80,000 contracted with the University of Arkansas (UARK) is eligible for a separate 33% credit, which is potentially uncapped against the internal research ceiling.

• Allowable University Research Credit: $\$80,000 \times 0.33 = \$26,400$

Total Available Tax Credit for BPS: $\$50,000 + \$26,400 = \$76,400$

C. Credit Utilization and Strategic Planning

If BPS’s Arkansas tax liability for the year is $40,000, the company would utilize $40,000 of the credit to offset 100% of its liability.3 The unused portion of the credit ($76,400 – $40,000 = $36,400) may be carried forward for up to nine years.19

The analysis of this scenario highlights a crucial strategic implication: the high-value 33% credit is effectively realized only on the first $151,515 of internal QREs. By restricting the annual credit to $50,000, the incentive mechanism is financially constrained for major R&D operations. However, BPS strategically supplemented its internal research with a university contract. Had BPS allocated more internal R&D funds to salaries above the $151,515 threshold, those expenditures would have yielded no additional state tax benefit. Therefore, to maximize the tax benefit, firms with high R&D budgets must strategically manage their QREs, potentially shifting resources exceeding the internal cap toward qualifying university partnerships to fully leverage the state’s generous tax policy for innovation.

D. Procedural Flow for Strategic Value R&D Tax Credit Compliance

The taxpayer must execute a precise procedural flow involving both the economic development and revenue agencies to legally claim the credit.

Procedural Flow for Strategic Value R&D Tax Credit Compliance

VII. Conclusion and Policy Implications

Research and development concerning Bio-Based Products is clearly recognized and actively promoted by Arkansas through its specialized R&D tax credit structure. The defining characteristic of eligibility rests on the product meeting the federal USDA standards, which focus on renewable, non-food/feed materials that act as petroleum alternatives. This mechanism binds state tax compliance to federal regulatory definitions, requiring taxpayers to prioritize USDA alignment before applying for the state incentive.

The financial framework is characterized by a high credit rate (33%) coupled with a significant limiting factor: the $50,000 annual cap on in-house strategic research. This structure limits the utility of the credit for large, established companies but provides a strong impetus for high-wage job creation in emerging, specialized firms.

Compliance is procedural and bifurcated. The AEDC/ASTA shoulders the technical burden of certifying the research as Strategic Value and verifying QREs, while the DFA focuses on receiving the resulting Certificate of Tax Credit and reconciling it against the taxpayer’s liability. Taxpayers must meticulously track qualifying wages and ensure the Certificate is issued in time for filing, leveraging the generous 100% tax liability offset and the nine-year carryforward period to maximize the long-term benefit of the incentive. Ultimately, the Arkansas R&D tax credit serves as a highly targeted policy tool, successfully integrating high-tech development incentives with the state’s dominant agricultural and forestry resources.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/