Expert Report on Arkansas Code § 15-4-2708: Research and Development Tax Credits and Administrative Compliance

Arkansas Code $\text{§ 15-4-2708}$ establishes state income tax credits ranging from 20% of incremental research spending to 33% of total expenditures for specific businesses. This legislation serves as the core statutory framework incentivizing businesses to conduct qualified research and development activities within the state of Arkansas.

Executive Summary: The Arkansas R&D Tax Credit under ACA § 15-4-2708

Arkansas Code $\text{§ 15-4-2708}$ is the foundation for state income tax credits designed to incentivize companies to conduct qualified research and development (R&D) activities within the state. These credits range from 20% of incremental research spending to 33% of total expenditures for targeted or strategic businesses, intended to spur technological innovation across several key economic sectors.

The Arkansas R&D tax credit regime is characterized by a multi-tiered structure that mandates distinct eligibility requirements, calculation methods (incremental vs. flat-rate), and administrative oversight split between the Arkansas Economic Development Commission (AEDC) for program approval and the Department of Finance and Administration (DFA) for tax compliance. A critical element of the state program, unlike its federal counterpart (IRC $\text{§ 41}$), is the narrow definition of Qualified Research Expenditures (QREs), which focuses almost exclusively on R&D wages and benefits, explicitly excluding supplies, equipment, and building costs. Businesses must secure a five-year financial incentive agreement and strategically elect the optimal program (e.g., the superior 33% Targeted Business credit) prior to claiming benefits, as combination of the in-house incentives is generally prohibited.

1. Statutory Meaning and Context: ACA § 15-4-2708

1.1. Legislative Mandate and Framework

The statutory foundation for the Arkansas Research and Development Tax Credits is established under Arkansas Code Annotated (ACA) $\text{§ 15-4-2708}$, which is a key component of the Consolidated Incentive Act of 2003 (Title 15, Chapter 4, Subchapter 27).1 This placement confirms the credit’s primary function as an economic development tool intended to bolster specific sectors of the state economy.

The incentives are strategically designed to address multiple facets of the R&D landscape, providing support for university-based research, various categories of in-house research, and research and development carried out by emerging, technology-based enterprises.2 This holistic approach aims to foster innovation across all stages of business maturity, from nascent startups to mature corporations. Before submitting any application, businesses are advised to thoroughly analyze the different incentives available to ensure selection of the most appropriate program tailored to the eligible R&D activity.2 Once an incentive agreement is executed, the term of the research and development financial incentive agreements under $\text{§ 15-4-2708}$ is fixed at five (5) years, commencing on the first day of the business’s tax year in which the agreement is officially signed with the AEDC. The term may not extend beyond five years from that date.2

1.2. The Multi-Tiered Incentive Structure of ACA § 15-4-2708

ACA $\text{§ 15-4-2708}$ does not establish a single credit but rather a matrix of four distinct incentive tracks. The qualification pathway—and consequently, the economic benefit—is dictated by the type of business, its level of maturity, and the specific focus of its research.

1. 20% Incremental In-House R&D (Subsection (a)): This program is discretionary and typically serves mature, existing eligible businesses that are performing ongoing R&D and that already qualify for federal R&D tax credits. The credit is calculated at twenty percent (20%) of qualified research expenditures that exceed a calculated baseline established in the preceding year.3
2. 33% Targeted Business R&D (Subsection (b)): This program is aimed at younger, dynamic firms that meet the criteria of a “Targeted Business” as defined elsewhere in the Consolidated Incentive Act ($\text{§ 15-4-2703}$). These businesses may qualify for an income tax credit equal to thirty-three percent (33%) of the amount spent on in-house research per year for the first five (5) tax years following the signing of the financial incentive agreement.4
3. 33% Strategic Value R&D (Subsection (c)): This credit is offered, at the discretion of the AEDC Director, to taxpayers investing in in-house research in areas deemed to have long-term economic or commercial value to the state, as identified by the Arkansas Science and Technology Authority (ASTA).4 This credit is also 33% of the amount spent on research for the initial five tax years.4
4. 33% University-Based R&D (Subsection (a) and related sections): An eligible business that contracts with one or more Arkansas colleges or universities to perform basic or applied research may qualify for a 33% income tax credit for those qualified research expenditures.3

1.3. Causal Relationship: The Imperative of Program Election (Anti-Stacking Rules)

A critical consideration within the Arkansas R&D structure is the strict prohibition on “stacking” or combining certain incentives. The statute and related guidance stipulate that incentives for in-house research generally cannot be combined with one another.2 For example, a targeted business may not use its income tax credit, authorized by $\text{§ 15-4-2708(c)}$, in combination with other in-house research and development incentives authorized by $\text{§ 15-4-2708(b)}$ or $\text{§ 15-4-2708(d)(1)(A)}$.3 Furthermore, a targeted business earning R&D tax credits is specifically prohibited from earning job creation tax credits, authorized by $\text{§ 15-4-2709}$, for the same expenditure.3

Because the term of the financial incentive agreement is set at five years, the determination of which program applies is not merely an annual tax calculation choice but a critical, binding election that locks the business into a predetermined benefit structure for a significant period. This necessitates rigorous pre-application diligence to ensure the business selects the most financially advantageous classification, such as securing “Targeted Business” classification, which offers the higher 33% flat-rate credit. A business that mistakenly pursues the 20% incremental path when it qualifies for the 33% Targeted Business path will forfeit superior tax benefits for the entire five-year term of the agreement. The only permissible area of combination is that incentives for in-house research may be combined with incentives for research performed in conjunction with universities.2

2. Defining Qualified Research Expenditures (QREs)

2.1. Narrow Scope: Arkansas vs. Federal IRC § 41

A core differentiator of the Arkansas R&D tax credit is its comparatively narrow definition of Qualified Research Expenditures (QREs) when measured against the definition used under the federal Internal Revenue Code (IRC) $\text{§ 41}$.7 Businesses must operate under a strict interpretation of the state definition to ensure compliance and avoid the risk of disallowed credits upon audit.

The Arkansas credit system primarily focuses on human capital costs. QREs include in-house expenses for taxable wages paid and the usual fringe benefits specific to research activities of employees of the business.8 This also extends to wages and usual fringe benefits paid to contractual employees, provided those agreements are approved in writing by the AEDC Director, especially in the context of research conducted by an Arkansas state college, university, or other Arkansas-based research organization for a targeted business.7 Qualified services are narrowly defined as services of employees who are actively engaging in the actual conduct of qualified research, or those engaging in the direct supervision (first-line management) or direct support of the research activities.2

2.2. Explicit Statutory Exclusions

To reinforce the focus on labor costs, Arkansas law explicitly excludes several cost categories often considered QREs at the federal level. The following activities and costs are specifically excluded from the definition of qualified research for purposes of this credit 2:

• Purchase of supplies or materials.
• Purchase of land.
• Purchase or rehabilitation of production machinery and equipment.8
• Construction or renovation of buildings.8
• General administrative services or other services only indirectly of benefit to the research activity.2
• Any research conducted after the beginning of commercial production.8
• Adaptation of an existing product or process to a particular customer’s need, duplication of an existing product or process, or market surveys or studies.8

The explicit exclusion of capital expenditures (equipment, buildings) and consumables (supplies) demonstrates a clear state policy directive. The credit mechanism is purposefully oriented toward incentivizing the creation and retention of R&D jobs within Arkansas—subsidizing the state’s intellectual workforce—rather than subsidizing large infrastructure or raw material costs. Consequently, for companies with high materials costs related to prototyping or large equipment purchases, the proportional value of the Arkansas R&D credit, based only on payroll, will be significantly lower relative to their total federal QREs. This structure compels businesses to maintain rigorous internal cost segregation to ensure materials and general overhead costs are accurately stripped out of the QRE base submitted for state credit calculation.

2.3. The Three-Part Test for Qualified Research Compliance

Regardless of the incentive track chosen, the underlying research activity must meet three specific, cumulative tests to qualify for the credit. These tests ensure the activity is genuinely innovative and technological 2:

1. Technological Purpose Test: The activity must be undertaken for the purpose of discovering information that is technological in nature.
2. Usefulness Test: The application of the technological information discovered must be intended to be useful in a new or improved business component.
3. Process of Experimentation Test: Substantially all activities related to the research effort must constitute elements of a process of experimentation relating to a new or improved function, performance, reliability, or quality.8

3. Calculation Methodologies and Base Year Complexity

The calculation method under $\text{§ 15-4-2708}$ varies significantly depending on whether the business is classified under the 20% incremental program or one of the 33% flat-rate programs.

3.1. Calculation for the 20% Incremental Program (§ 15-4-2708(a))

The standard in-house R&D credit is calculated at a 20% rate based on the incremental increase in QREs compared to a statutory baseline.4

$$\text{Credit} = 20\% \times (\text{Current Year QREs} – \text{Base Year QREs})$$

3.2. Detailed Base Year Determination Rules

The definition of the “Base Year QREs” is the most complex element of the 20% incremental program, as it determines the amount of expenditures eligible for the credit. The determination of the base year depends entirely on whether the business is classified as an existing facility or a new research facility.7

1. Existing Facilities: If a qualified business is an existing facility, the initial base year is defined as the QREs incurred during the year immediately preceding the signing of the Financial Incentive Agreement. In subsequent years, the base continues to increment, typically using the preceding year’s QREs.7
2. New Research Facilities/Start-ups: To incentivize new business creation, a crucial exception exists. For a new research facility, the base year is legally defined as zero ($0).10 This benefit applies for the first three (3) years following the date the financial incentive agreement is signed. This provision effectively allows 100% of QREs incurred during those first three years to factor into the credit calculation before applying the 20% rate. The base resets thereafter: the QREs from Year 3 establish the base for Year 4, and Year 4 QREs establish the base for Year 5.7

3.3. Calculation for the 33% Flat Rate Programs (Targeted/Strategic)

In contrast to the incremental approach, the programs targeting younger businesses or strategic research areas offer a superior, flat-rate calculation. Targeted businesses ($\text{§ 15-4-2708(b)}$) and taxpayers involved in Strategic Research ($\text{§ 15-4-2708(c)}$) are granted a credit equal to thirty-three percent (33%) of the amount spent on eligible in-house research per year, for the duration of the five-year agreement.4

Crucially, the primary financial advantage of these programs is the absence of a base year subtraction. The credit applies directly to the total QREs incurred, leading to a much higher potential credit value compared to the 20% incremental approach.7

However, the Strategic Research credit has a major limitation: the maximum tax credit that may be claimed by a taxpayer under this program is strictly capped at fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) per tax year.3 This cap means the Strategic Value program is generally only beneficial for smaller-scale projects, as the benefit is maxed out when total QREs reach approximately $151,515 ($50,000 / 0.33).

The flat-rate structure available to “Targeted Businesses” provides the highest level of incentive provided by the statute. Even a new business benefiting from the $0 base rule in the 20% program only receives a 20% rate for the first three years. The 33% Targeted Business rate applies to 100% of QREs for the full five-year term without imposing a future incremental penalty, resulting in significantly greater financial outcomes. Therefore, determining eligibility and securing the “Targeted Business” classification ($\text{§ 15-4-2703}$) represents the most optimal tax planning outcome for high-growth R&D companies.

4. State Revenue Office Guidance and Administrative Requirements

The administration and compliance structure for R&D tax credits rely on a two-pronged approach involving the AEDC for program management and the DFA for financial and audit control.

4.1. Role of the Arkansas Economic Development Commission (AEDC)

The AEDC serves as the gatekeeper for the R&D incentive programs. The AEDC Director holds discretionary authority regarding the approval of all primary R&D tax credit programs, including the 20% incremental credit and the 33% strategic credit.2

The application process requires substantial preparation. Applicants should understand the different incentives and receive assistance in selecting the most appropriate one before submission.2 The application must be submitted to the AEDC, generally 45 days prior to the company’s tax year-end, to allow adequate time for review and follow-up.2 The application must include a detailed project plan that clearly identifies the project’s intent, the planned expenditures, the start and end dates of the project, and an estimate of the total project costs.8

Before a taxpayer can claim the credit on their return, the Executive Director of the AEDC must approve the research expenditure as part of a qualified in-house research program or under the research and development programs of the division.10 Furthermore, the qualified business is required to certify annually to the AEDC the exact amount expended on in-house research.4

4.2. Role of the Department of Finance and Administration (DFA)

The DFA is the state revenue authority responsible for prescribing the necessary forms and managing the actual tax liability offset. Taxpayers must file the Certificate of Tax Credit issued by the AEDC or Commission as an attachment to their income tax return, utilizing the Schedule of Tax Credits (Form AR1000TC) prescribed by the Director of the Department of Finance and Administration (DFA).10 The claiming of the credit is also subject to limitations established under ACA $\text{§ 26-51-1103}$.4

A key aspect of administrative guidance issued by the DFA involves compliance audit risk. The DFA rules explicitly state that the issuance of the credit memorandum or certificate by the AEDC does not imply the eligibility of the expenditures, which remain subject to audit at a later date.13 This structure dictates a crucial separation of functions: the AEDC determines if the research program meets the state’s economic development goals (e.g., technological nature, strategic value), but the DFA retains full authority, as the state revenue agency, to review the financial substantiation. Therefore, AEDC administrative approval does not guarantee financial security if the business fails to maintain rigorous payroll and expense documentation that strictly aligns with Arkansas’s narrow definition of QREs (excluding supplies, equipment, etc.).8 Compliance rests fundamentally on the ability to substantiate the QREs to the satisfaction of the revenue authority, independent of the initial program approval.

5. Credit Utilization and Strategic Limitations

5.1. Utilization and Carryforward

The R&D tax credits granted under $\text{§ 15-4-2708}$ provide a significant offset mechanism against state income tax liability. A qualified business claiming these credits may offset up to one hundred percent (100%) of the business’s Arkansas income tax liability annually.4 This capacity for a full tax offset makes the credit highly valuable. Furthermore, any unused credits that cannot be applied in the current tax year may be carried forward for nine (9) years from the date they were issued.2 The credits are applicable to corporate income tax.2

5.2. Transferability and Liquidity

Transferability is a strategic component that distinguishes the incentive programs. Credits earned by targeted businesses under $\text{§ 15-4-2708(b)}$ may be sold, as authorized by ACA $\text{§ 15-4-2709}$.5 This ability to sell the credits provides crucial liquidity for younger, startup businesses classified as Targeted Businesses, enabling them to monetize the incentive immediately, even if they are not yet profitable and do not have current income tax liabilities to offset. Conversely, guidance for the general 20% In-House R&D Tax Credit Incentive Program often specifies that those credits cannot be sold.2

5.3. Combination Restrictions

Taxpayers must exercise caution to ensure that expenditures claimed for the R&D credit are not simultaneously claimed under other state incentive programs. Specifically, an expenditure used to claim the R&D credit is ineligible for use in claiming the Job Creation Tax Credits authorized by $\text{§ 15-4-2709}$ or other in-house research incentives within $\text{§ 15-4-2708}$.3 This necessitates careful financial planning during the application phase to ensure that the chosen path offers the highest net benefit, given the five-year commitment associated with the financial incentive agreement.

6. Illustrative Example: Calculation and Application

To illustrate the financial differences between the incremental and flat-rate programs, consider a comparison between a mature, established business and a qualifying Targeted Business.

6.1. Scenario Parameters

• Tax Year: Year 1 of Financial Incentive Agreement
• Total Arkansas QREs (Qualifying Payroll & Fringe): $500,000
• State Income Tax Liability: $100,000
• Business A (Mature Co.): Existing facility; utilizes the 20% Incremental In-House R&D credit. Base Year QREs (Year 0) = $200,000.
• Business B (Targeted Business): Utilizes the 33% Targeted Business R&D credit. Flat Rate calculation applies (no base subtraction).

6.2. Detailed Calculation and Impact Analysis

6.3. Conclusion of Example

As demonstrated in the scenario, the classification of the business under $\text{§ 15-4-2708}$ dictates the magnitude of the financial benefit. Business B, classified as a Targeted Business, generates $105,000 more in credit than Business A on the exact same expenditures. Business B successfully eliminates its entire state income tax liability and generates a substantial $65,000 credit carryforward that can be used in future profitable years or potentially sold for immediate liquidity (depending on program rules). This confirms that for businesses eligible for the 33% Targeted Business rate, the flat calculation model is dramatically superior to the incremental calculation model.

7. Strategic Compliance Recommendations

Based on the multi-tiered structure, the narrow definition of QREs, and the dual oversight of the AEDC and DFA, strategic compliance requires pre-emptive planning and stringent documentation.

7.1. Program Election and Program Management

The process must begin with a strategic classification review. Corporate tax teams must thoroughly vet the company’s eligibility to be classified as a “Targeted Business” under $\text{§ 15-4-2703}$ or as a “New Research Facility” to secure the maximum available benefit (33% flat rate and transferability, or 20% rate with a temporary $\$0$ base, respectively). Once the program is identified, the application process must be initiated with the AEDC 45 days prior to the company’s tax year-end to ensure the financial incentive agreement is signed and in effect for the desired period.2 This initial election is a five-year commitment, making the pre-application decision the most critical tax planning step.

7.2. Rigorous Financial Documentation

Given the DFA’s explicit retention of audit authority over expenditures, irrespective of AEDC program approval, financial compliance must be watertight. Taxpayers must implement a rigorous internal cost segregation system designed to align with Arkansas’s uniquely narrow QRE definition. This system must clearly separate and track qualifying R&D payroll (wages and usual fringe benefits) from all excluded costs, including supplies, equipment, building costs, and non-R&D administrative overhead.2 Failure to maintain this specific documentation risks full disallowance of the credit during a DFA audit, even if the AEDC had previously certified the project.

7.3. Optimal Credit Utilization

For taxpayers operating under the Targeted Business classification, the potential liquidity provided by the transferability of the credit should be evaluated as part of the overall funding strategy, particularly for firms in early growth stages that anticipate losses or minimal profits. Regardless of the program, the ability to offset 100% of the annual Arkansas income tax liability and carry forward unused credits for nine years provides a reliable, long-term state tax asset that should be factored into financial projections and tax liability management.2

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/