The Incremental Imperative: Decoding the Arkansas R&D Tax Credit Baseline and Dynamic Calculation Methodology

I. Executive Summary: The Mechanics of the Incremental Amount

The Incremental Amount Defined

The Incremental Amount represents Qualified Research Expenditures (QREs) incurred in the current year that exceed the spending benchmark, or baseline, established by the preceding tax year’s investment.1 The resulting In-House R&D Tax Credit is then calculated at a rate of up to 20% of this incremental expenditure, rewarding only the growth in Arkansas R&D activity.1

Context and Purpose of the In-House R&D Tax Credit

The In-House Research and Development Tax Credit, codified under Arkansas Code Annotated (ACA) § 15-4-2708(a), is a discretionary tax incentive administered by the Arkansas Economic Development Commission (AEDC).2 This program is fundamentally designed to incentivize mature companies that are performing ongoing, sustained in-house research and development within the State of Arkansas.1

The core policy objective underlying the incremental calculation methodology is to ensure that state incentives subsidize new investment and expanding research efforts, rather than simply rewarding routine, pre-existing R&D activities. By limiting the credit only to the excess QREs above a defined baseline, the state focuses its fiscal resources on encouraging a trajectory of increasing innovation.1 Once approved by the AEDC Director, eligible businesses enter into a five-year financial incentive agreement to claim the credits.1

A preliminary requirement for eligibility is that the research activity must first qualify for the federal R&D tax credits under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41.2 This federal prerequisite establishes a necessary threshold of technological and scientific rigor, aligning the state program with nationally recognized standards of innovation. However, the subsequent use of a unique, dynamic state-level calculation method—the rolling incremental base—demonstrates Arkansas’s explicit policy preference for encouraging long-term, sustained year-over-year growth in research spending rather than simply mirroring the federal mechanism, which often utilizes a fixed-base percentage calculation.5 This dual approach streamlines the initial technical review by relying on federal determinations but retains stringent fiscal control by rewarding only the demonstrated expansion of Qualified Research Expenditures (QREs) within Arkansas.

II. Statutory and Regulatory Foundation

Governing Legislation and Administrative Oversight

The specific rules governing the In-House R&D Tax Credit, and crucially, the calculation of the incremental amount, are defined primarily in Ark. Code Ann. § 15-4-2708 and the detailed administrative rules found in 15 CAR § 143-206.2 Successful compliance requires navigating the requirements of three distinct state agencies:

1. Arkansas Economic Development Commission (AEDC): The Director of the AEDC holds discretionary authority to approve eligible businesses for the incentive program.2 The business must execute a five-year financial incentive agreement with the Commission, and the research project plan itself forms the basis for the Commission’s approval decision regarding the tax credit treatment.1
2. Arkansas Science and Technology Authority (ASTA): The ASTA often works in coordination with the AEDC, particularly for programs involving strategic value or university research, but its role in the 20% program is crucial for final certification. Upon approval of the qualified research program, the ASTA issues a mandatory Certificate of Tax Credit.7
3. Department of Finance and Administration (DFA): The DFA serves as the state’s revenue collection and administration office. To claim the authorized credits, the taxpayer must attach a copy of the Certificate of Tax Credit issued by the ASTA/AEDC to their Arkansas income tax return.7

Qualified Research Expenditures (QREs) under Arkansas Law

A fundamental distinction in the Arkansas R&D tax credit regime is its narrower definition of Qualified Research Expenditures (QREs) compared to the federal IRC § 41 definition.9 This divergence means taxpayers cannot simply carry over the total QREs calculated for their federal claim.

Eligible Expenditures

For the 20% In-House R&D Tax Credit, QREs are primarily limited to labor costs.1 Specifically, QREs include taxable wages and benefits paid to a full-time permanent employee or contractual employee for performing qualified services.1 Qualified services are narrowly defined as:

• Engaging in the actual conduct of qualified research.1
• Engaging in the direct supervision (first-line management) of qualified research.1
• Engaging in the direct support of research activities which constitute qualified research.1 Direct support explicitly excludes general administrative services or other services only indirectly benefiting the research activity.1

Ineligible Expenditures

In stark contrast to the federal treatment, the Arkansas QRE base for the 20% incremental credit specifically excludes supplies, equipment purchases, and costs related to buildings and facilities.1

This stricter state definition imposes an enhanced compliance burden on taxpayers. Companies must implement detailed accounting procedures to isolate and exclude non-wage expenditures, such as materials and equipment, from the state QRE calculation, even if those expenditures qualified for the federal credit. Failure to correctly delineate the state QREs will result in an incorrect incremental amount calculation and potential claim rejection.

III. Dynamic Calculation of the Incremental Amount and Baseline Rules

The essence of the 20% R&D credit is the dynamic calculation of the Incremental Amount, achieved by subtracting a rolling baseline from the current year’s QREs. This methodology is specifically detailed in the administrative rules 15 CAR § 143-206 (d)(1)(B)-(D).6

Initial Baseline Determination (Year 1 of the Agreement)

The base amount (the spending benchmark) established for the first year of the financial incentive agreement depends entirely on the taxpayer’s historical research activity in Arkansas:

• Existing Research Activity (Non-Zero Baseline): For a qualified business that previously claimed federal R&D tax credits involving Arkansas research, the initial baseline is the amount of research conducted in the state as claimed for federal purposes during the most recent year prior to signing the agreement.6 The tax credit for Year 1 is calculated by taking the current year’s QREs and subtracting this predetermined initial baseline.6
• New Business or Facility (The Zero Base Rule): If the in-house research facility did not claim any research conducted in the state for federal R&D tax credits during the most recent year, the initial base amount is set at zero ($0).6 In this advantageous scenario, all eligible expenditures incurred during the first year of the agreement will qualify toward the incremental calculation, up to the annual credit cap.6

The Rolling Base for Succeeding Years (The Incremental Hurdle)

After the first year, the Arkansas incentive utilizes a “rolling base” methodology, where the baseline is reset annually to equal the expenditures of the previous year. This is the mechanism that enforces sustained growth.

The administrative rules mandate that for succeeding years (Year N, where $N > 1$), the tax credits shall be calculated as the difference between the current year’s qualified research conducted in the state and the previous year’s research conducted in the state.6

Mathematically, the calculation follows:

$$\text{Incremental Amount} = \text{QREs}_\text{Current Year} – \text{QREs}_\text{Prior Year}$$

This structure carries a significant operational risk: if a company aggressively invests in R&D, thereby generating a large credit in Year 1, that high spending level automatically becomes the high baseline for Year 2. To earn a credit in Year 2, the company must exceed the high QRE level set in Year 1. If QREs drop or plateau, the incremental amount is zero or negative, resulting in no credit being earned for that tax year, despite the company potentially still investing heavily in R&D. This design necessitates strict operational control and the execution of a strategy built upon sustained, quantifiable QRE growth over the entire five-year agreement period to maximize the incentive’s value.

Addressing Administrative Ambiguity in Phased Calculations

While some practitioner guidance may reference an older or generalized phased structure, such as claiming a zero base for the first three years of a new facility 9, the specific, codified administrative rules provide a definitive methodology. 15 CAR § 143-206(d)(1)(D) and the accompanying examples clearly illustrate that the rolling base calculation (Year $N-1$ QREs establishing the Year $N$ baseline) is applied immediately in the second year, even for a new facility that benefited from a $\$0$ base in Year 1.6 In all compliance matters, the specific, current rule as published in the Code of Arkansas Rules must govern the calculation.

IV. Practical Application: Detailed Multi-Year Calculation Example

To demonstrate the crucial impact of the dynamic rolling baseline and the interplay of the annual limitation, the following example traces the R&D spending and resulting tax credit for an existing Arkansas company, AR-Tech Innovations, over a five-year incentive agreement. This assumes the reported maximum annual credit of $\$10,000$ for the 20% incremental program is enforced.

Scenario Details:

• Company is an existing R&D facility.
• Initial Baseline (Pre-Year 1): $\$200,000$ (based on QREs claimed in the most recent prior year).6
• Credit Rate: 20% of Incremental Amount.
• Annual Credit Cap: $\$10,000$ (The reported maximum for this specific program).9

The example clearly demonstrates that AR-Tech Innovations earned a positive credit in Years 1, 2, and 4, specifically because the QREs in those years exceeded the preceding year’s spending.6

However, the consequences of the rolling base are immediately visible in Year 3 and Year 5. In Year 3, a slight decrease in QREs (from $\$650,000$ to $\$600,000$) resulted in a negative incremental amount and a $\$0$ tax credit, confirming that growth must be maintained to benefit from the incentive. Furthermore, in Years 1, 2, and 4, the calculated credit far exceeded the maximum reported annual credit of $\$10,000$.9 For instance, in Year 1, while the incremental amount of $\$300,000$ calculated a credit of $\$60,000$, the business could only claim the capped amount, thus dramatically limiting the immediate financial benefit derived from large R&D investments.

V. Program Limitations and Strategic Utility

Credit Caps and Dollar Limitations

While the state law authorizes a credit rate of up to 20% of the incremental amount spent on in-house research 2, the program’s practical utility is constrained by a specific maximum annual limitation.

Multiple sources of practitioner and administrative guidance indicate that the maximum credit that can be earned by a business under the 20% incremental in-house research program is $\$10,000$ per tax year.9

If this $\$10,000$ cap is enforced, it profoundly alters the incentive structure. To earn the full $\$10,000$ credit, a company only needs incremental QREs of $\$50,000$ (calculated as $\$10,000$ divided by the 20% rate). Any QRE growth exceeding $\$50,000$ above the prior year’s base provides no additional tax credit under this specific program. This strategic consideration means that companies projecting R&D growth significantly exceeding this $\$50,000$ threshold must evaluate whether other, higher-value Arkansas incentive programs are more appropriate, especially the 33% flat-rate credits, which offer a distinct and higher statutory cap.

For context, the alternative R&D credit programs, such as the Research and Development in Area of Strategic Value program (a 33% flat-rate incentive), maintain a significantly higher statutory limit of $\$50,000$ per tax year.3

Credit Utilization and Carryforward

The credit’s utility is enhanced by its generous carryforward provisions, which mitigate the risk associated with short-term fluctuations in tax liability. The tax credits may be used to offset up to 100% of a company’s annual Arkansas income tax liability.3 This is a crucial feature, as many state credits limit the offset percentage. Furthermore, any unused credits may be carried forward for nine (9) consecutive years beyond the year in which the credit was first earned.3 This long carryforward period ensures that businesses—particularly startups or those incurring temporary losses during the R&D phase—have ample time to realize the value of the accrued credit.

VI. Contrast: Non-Incremental R&D Credits (The 33% Alternative)

The Arkansas R&D incentive landscape is composed of multiple programs under ACA § 15-4-2708. For companies that qualify, the non-incremental, flat-rate options may offer a greater benefit than the standard 20% incremental credit, particularly due to the absence of the rolling base requirement and the higher cap for strategic investments.

The Flat-Rate Calculation (No Baseline Subtraction)

Arkansas offers a 33% income tax credit for research expenditures in highly specific, targeted areas, which are explicitly designed to avoid the complexities of the incremental base calculation.9 These programs include:

1. Targeted Business R&D: Businesses deemed to operate within one of the six designated targeted sectors (e.g., Advanced materials, Biotechnology, Information Technology) may qualify for a 33% credit on qualified in-house research expenditures for five years.1
2. Strategic Value R&D: This credit, also set at 33%, is available for research projects that have been identified as having long-term economic or commercial value to the state and approved by the Arkansas Science and Technology Authority (ASTA).3 This specific program is subject to the $\$50,000$ annual credit cap.3
3. University-Based R&D: An eligible business that contracts with an Arkansas college or university for research may qualify for a 33% credit on those qualified expenditures.3

For these 33% credits, the calculation is a straightforward multiplication of QREs by the 33% rate, with no subtraction of a historical base amount.9 This eliminates the risk inherent in the dynamic rolling baseline calculation.

Comparison of Calculation Methodology

The strategic selection of the R&D credit program depends heavily on the expected nature and consistency of the company’s research spending:

For a business with high-value, potentially non-recurring R&D projects, or those whose spending is expected to fluctuate, pursuing the 33% credit—if eligible—offers a substantial advantage. By avoiding the volatile rolling base calculation, the company ensures that high-cost research generates the maximum credit in the year the expenditures are incurred, regardless of future spending patterns. Conversely, the 20% incremental credit is better suited for mature companies that can reliably sustain marginal, predictable annual growth in their R&D budget.

VII. DFA Compliance, Reporting, and Administration

Pre-Certification and Filing Requirements

The Arkansas R&D tax credit process is a pre-certification system, meaning the claim must be approved by the economic development authorities before the DFA will authorize the credit on the tax return.

The initial application to the AEDC must be robust, including a detailed project plan that clearly identifies the project’s intent, the planned expenditures, estimated total project costs, and the anticipated start and end dates.3 The application and project plan serve as the basis for the Commission’s decision to approve the credit.1 For certain credits, such as those for targeted businesses, applications must often be submitted 45 days prior to the end of the tax year.9

Once the project is approved and the expenditures are incurred, the ASTA issues a Certificate of Tax Credit.7 To claim the authorized income tax credit, the taxpayer must attach this Certificate of Tax Credit directly to their Arkansas income tax return (e.g., corporate filers may use the AR1100CT form).8 There is no specialized, numbered state R&D calculation form comparable to the federal Form 6765; the Certificate of Tax Credit serves as the primary and sufficient documentation for the DFA to process the final claim.8

The DFA’s streamlined process of accepting the ASTA-issued Certificate as the final authority on the credit amount places a significant administrative burden on the taxpayer during the application and expenditure tracking phase. Companies must ensure that their internal tracking of QREs and the calculation of the dynamic baseline are meticulous and conform precisely to the five-year financial agreement and the AEDC’s specific requirements.

Credit Transferability and Usage

General utilization of the credit allows for up to 100% of the annual income tax liability to be offset, with a generous nine-year carryforward period.9 However, the ability to transfer or sell the credit is limited:

• Transferability: Only the 33% credits earned by Targeted Businesses may be sold one time within one year of being issued.1 The standard 20% incremental credit is generally non-transferable.
• Non-Combination Rule: Taxpayers must be vigilant regarding program overlap. The income tax credit for research by a targeted business may not be used in conjunction with other in-house R&D incentives—such as the 20% incremental credit—for the same expenditures.9 This necessitates an explicit choice between the 20% incremental program and the 33% targeted program if a business qualifies for both.

VIII. Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

The Arkansas In-House R&D Tax Credit is distinct from the federal incentive, primarily due to its singular focus on the Incremental Amount. This calculation, mandated by the dynamic, rolling baseline rule detailed in 15 CAR § 143-206, requires that current Qualified Research Expenditures (QREs) exceed the prior year’s QREs to generate any credit.6 While this structure strongly incentivizes continuous, year-over-year R&D budget growth, it introduces a high degree of volatility, as any failure to exceed the prior year’s spending results in a zero credit for that period.

Furthermore, the program’s utility is significantly curtailed by three major constraints: the narrow definition of QREs (excluding supplies and equipment) 1, the mandatory pre-certification process through the AEDC, and the reported $\$10,000$ annual credit cap for the 20% incremental program.9

Strategic Recommendations

For businesses seeking to maximize their tax benefit from Arkansas R&D activity, the following strategic considerations are paramount:

1. Prioritize Program Selection: Companies projecting robust, high-dollar R&D growth should first determine eligibility for the 33% flat-rate Strategic Value or Targeted Business programs. The higher statutory cap $(\$50,000)$ and the removal of the restrictive rolling base calculation make these alternatives potentially far more valuable, provided the strict qualification criteria are met.3
2. Optimize Incremental Investment: For businesses confined to the 20% incremental program, investment strategies must be optimized around the effective $\$50,000$ incremental QRE ceiling. Since growth beyond this threshold provides no further credit benefit, large spending increases should be carefully managed or potentially phased to ensure maximum incentive capture over the five-year agreement term.
3. Mandatory QRE Segregation: Given the narrow Arkansas definition of QREs—limited primarily to wages and fringe benefits—meticulous accounting is necessary to segregate state-eligible expenditures from federal-eligible expenditures. Taxpayers must ensure that all non-wage costs, such as equipment and supplies, are stripped out before calculating the state incremental amount.9

Long-Term Forecasting: The rolling base rule demands that tax planning be integrated directly with operational R&D budgeting. Tax teams must forecast QREs over the full five-year agreement period to proactively manage the baseline and predict the incremental amount. The credit is fundamentally a reward for sustained growth, not merely sustained spending.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/