Analysis of New Machinery and Equipment within the Arkansas R&D Tax Credit Program

I. Executive Summary: The Definition and Opportunity of New Machinery and Equipment

A. Introduction to the NME Credit

New Machinery and Equipment (NME) qualifies for a 33% Arkansas R&D tax credit only when it is donated or sold below cost to a qualified educational institution for use in an approved research program.

This high-value incentive differs fundamentally from the standard in-house R&D credits, which explicitly exclude corporate equipment purchases as Qualified Research Expenditures (QREs).1

B. Strategic Analysis: Why the NME Credit is Distinct from In-House R&D

The Arkansas Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credit Program is structured to offer distinct incentives for different types of investment, a key factor that corporate taxpayers must address for proper compliance. A critical structural separation exists in the treatment of capital assets versus labor costs. For companies claiming the general In-House R&D Tax Credit (typically 20%), the definition of Qualified Research Expenditures (QREs) is narrowly focused on qualified R&D salaries and wages.1 Crucially, the rules explicitly dictate that supplies, equipment, and buildings do not qualify for this standard in-house incentive.1

The credit for New Machinery and Equipment (NME) addresses capital assets through a separate, high-value program offering a 33% credit.2 This mechanism is not designed to reduce the cost of machinery used by the taxpayer for internal operational R&D. Rather, it is established as a strategic tool to promote public-private partnerships, encouraging the donation or sale below cost of advanced capital assets to qualified educational institutions.1 This structure underscores a clear legislative priority: leveraging private investment to directly enhance public academic research infrastructure and facilitate technology transfer, rather than simply subsidizing the internal depreciation costs of private firms. Taxpayers seeking a tax credit related to machinery must engage externally, as internal equipment purchases are deliberately excluded from the standard QRE definitions.

II. The Regulatory Foundation of Arkansas R&D Incentives

A. Statutory Authority and Administrative Oversight

The statutory authority for the Arkansas R&D credit program is primarily derived from Arkansas Code § 15-4-2708.2 Administration is a multi-agency effort. The Arkansas Economic Development Commission (AEDC) and the Arkansas Science and Technology Authority (ASTA) manage the discretionary approval, application review, and project certification processes.1 The final utilization, where the approved credit is offset against state income tax liability, falls under the purview of the Department of Finance and Administration (DFA).3

B. Overview of Arkansas R&D Tax Credit Programs

Arkansas provides multiple R&D tax credit pathways, each designed for specific purposes and types of firms. Taxpayers must confirm that their expenditures fit the appropriate program’s criteria:

1. In-House Research and Development (General): This discretionary program targets mature companies with ongoing R&D operations. The credit rate is 20% of QREs, specifically those expenditures that exceed a calculated baseline from the preceding year.8 As stated, QREs are limited to wages and salaries, excluding capital expenditures like equipment.1
2. Strategic Value/Targeted Business Research: This incentive is available to businesses engaged in research in strategic areas (fields having long-term economic value) or designated as targeted businesses. The income tax credit is equal to 33% of the qualified research expenditures incurred each year.8 This program is subject to a strict annual maximum credit cap of $50,000 per tax year 8, and the incentive agreement term is limited to five years.1
3. New Machinery and Equipment (NME) Donation/Sale: This program provides a 33% credit for certain donations or sales below cost of new machinery and equipment to a qualified research program.3

C. Program Differentiation: Qualified Expenditure Types

The necessity of accurately classifying expenditures cannot be overstated. Since machinery and equipment are explicitly excluded from the general in-house QRE definition, any capital expenditure intended to generate a state tax credit must adhere to the high-value NME donation/sale model.

Table 1: Arkansas R&D Tax Credit Program Differentiation

III. Deconstructing the Definition of Qualified New Machinery and Equipment

Eligibility for the NME credit depends on meeting specific requirements regarding the asset’s condition, the recipient entity, and the research purpose. These definitions are contained within the rules and regulations administered by the DFA and ASTA.3

A. Defining “New Machinery and Equipment” in Regulation

The foundational regulatory requirement is that the asset must be “new machinery and equipment”.3 This criterion ensures that the tax incentive supports fresh capital investment into the research ecosystem. It effectively disqualifies used, previously depreciated, or refurbished equipment from consideration for the credit, even if that equipment is functionally adequate for the research program.

B. Interpreting “State-of-the-Art Machinery and Equipment”

Adding another layer of stringency, the rules further define the asset quality by requiring it to be “State-of-the-Art Machinery and Equipment”.3

The regulation defines this term as: “machinery and equipment which is of the same type, design, and capability as like machinery and equipment which is currently sold or manufactured by donee for sale to customers”.3

While the typical recipient—a qualified educational institution—does not engage in manufacturing or commercial sales of machinery, the legal interpretation of this clause serves as a quality benchmark. The provision is understood to mandate that the equipment must represent the highest current commercial standards and capability available in the general market for that category of machinery. This ensures the donated asset provides maximum technological benefit to the research program. Taxpayers must be prepared to demonstrate that the NME is contemporary in design and capability, confirming its “newness” goes beyond simple acquisition date. Crucially, the regulations require that the receiving institution must explicitly confirm that the machinery is “new” machinery or equipment as defined by these rules.3 This external certification is a necessary compliance step.

C. Identifying Qualified Research Programs and Educational Institutions

The 33% NME credit is strictly contingent upon partnership with designated public or educational entities. The recipient must be a “qualified educational institution” contributing to a “qualified research program”.3

1. Qualified Educational Institution: This is defined as a school located in Arkansas and qualified for tax-exempt status under Arkansas Income Tax Law, or any public elementary or secondary school located in Arkansas.3 Typically, this involves state universities and colleges with active research programs.
2. Qualified Research Program: This program must be undertaken by the qualified educational institution and must meet the eligibility criteria established by the Arkansas Science & Technology Authority’s (ASTA) Applied Research Grant Program or Basic Research Grant Program.3 This linkage ensures that the supported research aligns with strategic state economic and technological development goals.

IV. Agency Guidance: Compliance, Administration, and Credit Calculation

Guidance from the DFA and administrative rules from the ASTA prescribe the calculation methods and specific documentation required to claim the credit.

A. Calculation of the 33% Credit Rate

The designated credit rate for the NME incentive is thirty-three percent (33%).2 The basis upon which this percentage is calculated depends on the mechanism of the asset transfer:

1. Donation of New Machinery or Equipment: If the asset is donated outright, the amount of credit is 33% of the fair market value of the donated machinery or equipment.4
2. Sale Below Cost of New Machinery or Equipment: If the taxpayer sells the NME to the educational institution at a reduced price, the credit is 33% of the amount by which the cost is reduced.6 This “cost reduction” is determined by the difference between the taxpayer’s original cost basis and the below-cost sale price to the recipient.

B. The Administrative Process: Roles of ASTA and DFA

The application for this tax credit must be submitted to the Arkansas Science and Technology Authority (ASTA).6 The submission must include an application form and a project plan that explicitly details the intent of the research project, the planned expenditures, and the project’s start and end dates.8 This documentation forms the basis for the Commission’s decision regarding approval of tax credit treatment.1

C. Documentation Requirements for Taxpayers and Recipients

Regulatory compliance is contingent upon securing specific, mandatory statements from the recipient institution and verifying the original asset cost. The regulations require the following documentation for each asset transferred:

Table 2: Required Documentation for NME Donation/Sale Credit

V. Credit Limitations and Utilization Strategy

Understanding the limitations on credit utilization is paramount for assessing the cash flow impact of the NME credit.

A. Credit Application and Carryforward

Arkansas R&D tax credits, including those derived from NME transfers, may generally be used to offset up to 100% of a company’s annual Arkansas state income tax liability.8 This generous offset capability is coupled with a long carryforward period: any unused credit amount may be carried forward for a maximum of nine (9) consecutive tax periods.8

B. Analysis of the 50% Aggregate Credit Limitation

While the 100% offset rule exists, a key regulatory detail must be noted concerning the 33% credit programs. The DFA rules specify that the total credit claimed for qualified research expenditures, donations, and sales below cost shall be limited to 50 percent of the taxpayer’s income tax liability.6

This provision appears to restrict the annual utilization of the higher-value credits (including the NME credit) to half of the total tax liability, contrasting with the general 100% offset. In practice, the 50% restriction is typically applied to the specific, high-rate (33%) incentives, whereas the 20% incremental credit is afforded the 100% offset. Therefore, for sound tax planning regarding the NME donation/sale below cost credit, taxpayers should assume the more conservative 50% limit on annual income tax offset will apply to the credit generated by the NME transaction. This interpretation necessitates careful modeling of the nine-year carryforward period, especially for large donations.

C. Strategic Timing of Donations

Given the substantial 33% rate and the possibility of a 50% utilization cap, maximizing the benefit of the NME credit requires astute timing. Donations should be strategically timed in years projected to have high Arkansas income tax liability to minimize the amount of credit carried forward. Furthermore, the complexity of securing external certification and ASTA pre-approval requires that the compliance process be initiated well in advance of the planned tax year end.

VI. Case Study: Maximizing the New Machinery and Equipment Credit through a Below-Cost Sale

This example illustrates the regulatory requirements and calculation steps for a below-cost NME sale.

A. Scenario Setup: “The Collaborative Manufacturing Investment”

Advanced Composites LLC (ACLLC), an Arkansas-based manufacturer, decides to sell a new piece of equipment to a qualified academic partner.

• Taxpayer: Advanced Composites LLC (ACLLC).
• Recipient: The University of Arkansas Advanced Materials Research Center (UAMRC), a qualified educational institution with an approved research program.
• Asset: A new, State-of-the-Art 3D Industrial Composite Printer.
• Original Cost (Taxpayer Basis): $150,000.
• Sale Price to UAMRC (Below Cost): $50,000.
• ACLLC’s Arkansas Tax Liability for the Year: $200,000.

B. Step-by-Step Credit Calculation

1. Determine the Cost Reduction: The credit is based on the cost reduction realized by the educational institution.6

• Cost Reduction Amount: $\$150,000$ (Original Cost) $-\$50,000$ (Sale Price) $= \mathbf{\$100,000}$

1. Calculate the Tax Credit: The credit is 33% of the cost reduction.

• Tax Credit: $\$100,000 \times 33\% = \mathbf{\$33,000}$

1. Apply Credit Limitations: Assuming the 50% utilization limit applies to the NME credit.6

• Tax Liability: $200,000
• 50% Limit: $\$200,000 \times 50\% = \$100,000$
• Since the calculated credit ($33,000) is below the $\$100,000$ limit, ACLLC utilizes the full $\$33,000$ credit in the current year.
• Resulting Tax Liability: $\$200,000 – \$33,000 = \$167,000$.

C. The Compliance and Documentation Chain

To substantiate the claim, ACLLC must provide the following:

1. ACLLC’s Submission: A copy of the original supplier invoice documenting the $\$150,000$ cost basis.6
2. UAMRC’s Formal Statement: UAMRC must issue a single statement certifying: a) Receipt of the equipment; b) That the 3D printer is “new” and “State-of-the-Art” according to the rules; c) The sale occurred below cost for $\$50,000$; and d) The printer will be used in a qualified research program.3
3. Application and Filing: ACLLC submits the application, project plan, and all certifications to ASTA for approval. Upon certification, ACLLC claims the $\$33,000$ credit when filing its Arkansas corporate income tax return with the DFA.

VII. Conclusion and Expert Recommendations

A. Synthesis of Findings

The Arkansas R&D New Machinery and Equipment credit is a structurally specific, high-value (33%) incentive dedicated to facilitating technology transfer from the private sector to state academic research institutions. It is essential to recognize that this credit is not a mechanism for claiming internal capital expenditures as QREs, as equipment is explicitly excluded from general in-house R&D expenses. Successful utilization of the 33% NME credit is entirely dependent upon rigorous adherence to administrative rules, particularly securing the mandated external certifications confirming the asset’s “new” and “State-of-the-Art” designation and its dedicated use in an approved research program.3

B. Key Takeaways and Expert Recommendations

1. Strict Eligibility Verification: Companies must confirm that both the donation recipient and the specific research program strictly meet the definition of “qualified educational institution” and “qualified research program” prior to engaging in the transaction.
2. Mandatory Documentation Rigor: The regulatory requirement for the recipient institution to issue a statement certifying the machinery is “new” and “State-of-the-Art” is the most critical compliance step. Failure to obtain an explicit, detailed certification matching the statutory language will invalidate the credit claim.
3. Strategic Credit Modeling: Taxpayers must utilize a conservative approach by modeling the utilization of the 33% NME credit subject to the potential 50% cap on annual income tax offset.6 This planning ensures that the nine-year carryforward provision is used effectively to realize the full economic benefit of the donation.

Proactive Agency Engagement: Due to the complexity surrounding the utilization caps and the requirement for technical definition confirmation (“State-of-the-Art”), taxpayers are strongly advised to seek pre-approval from the AEDC/ASTA on the specific interpretation and application of the NME credit rules for their planned transfer, thus mitigating audit risk from the Department of Finance and Administration.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/