Navigating the Arkansas R&D Tax Credit Landscape: A Detailed Analysis of the Non-Combination Rule

Executive Summary: The Mandate of Exclusive Expenditure

The Non-Combination Rule (NCR) in Arkansas is a foundational statutory principle ensuring fiscal responsibility in tax incentives. Targeted credits cannot be combined with other in-house incentives for the same expenditures [1]. This framework prevents “double-dipping” by explicitly prohibiting the use of a single Qualified Research Expenditure (QRE) dollar to claim multiple, stacking state tax incentives, requiring careful strategic elections and precise cost segregation.

The Arkansas R&D tax credit system, administered primarily by the Arkansas Economic Development Commission (AEDC) and informed by the Department of Finance and Administration (DFA) rules, utilizes the NCR to control the distribution of subsidies under the Consolidated Incentive Act of 2003 (Act 182) [2, 3]. This mandate is crucial for businesses aiming to maximize their benefits while remaining compliant with state law, compelling them to choose the most appropriate incentive pathway—whether the general In-House R&D credit, the higher-rate Targeted Business credit, or strategic combinations of non-overlapping incentives [2, 4].

I. Introduction: Contextualizing Arkansas R&D Incentives and the Non-Combination Mandate

1.1 Policy Goals and Multi-Tiered Approach

Arkansas established its Research and Development tax credit programs under the legislative intent of stimulating innovation, particularly within university-based research, corporate in-house R&D, and technology-based start-up enterprises [4]. The state’s economic development strategy, formalized through the Consolidated Incentive Act, utilizes these tax credits to encourage activity in high-value sectors [3].

This policy goal led to the creation of a tiered, discretionary structure designed to support various types of R&D activities and firms [4]. The R&D incentive framework is segmented to address different stages of corporate maturity and strategic focus [4]. Incentives for in-house research target mature firms with ongoing programs, younger or “targeted” firms engaged in research over limited five-year periods, and emerging firms focused on strategic R&D [2, 4]. This strategic segmentation, while providing diverse opportunities, necessitates the Non-Combination Rule to manage the relationships between these potentially mutually exclusive paths. Prior to submitting an application, applicants must understand the different incentives and receive assistance in selecting the most appropriate incentive for the eligible research activity [4].

1.2 Overview of Key R&D Programs and Rates

Arkansas offers several distinct R&D incentives, each with unique requirements and rates, reinforcing the need for the NCR to manage election strategy [5]:

• In-House R&D Tax Credit Incentive (20%): This program is intended for mature companies performing ongoing in-house R&D. The credit is 20% of qualified R&D salaries that exceed a baseline expenditure established in the preceding year, available for a period of five years [6]. Qualified expenditures are strictly limited to wages and certain fringe benefits for those engaging in, supervising, or directly supporting qualified research [4]. The maximum credit that can be earned is capped at $\$10,000$ per tax year [5].
• Targeted Business R&D Tax Credit Incentive (33%): This program provides a substantially higher credit rate for businesses designated by the AEDC as fitting within six key economic sectors, such as Advanced Materials, Biotechnology, and Information Technology [5, 7]. This discretionary credit offers 33% of qualified R&D salaries incurred each year for a limited term of up to five years [4, 5]. Most R&D credits, excluding the capped 20% program, offer unlimited offsets against income tax [5].
• University-Based Research: An eligible business that contracts with an Arkansas college or university to perform qualified research may qualify for a 33% credit for QREs [5, 7].

1.3 Definition and Purpose of the Non-Combination Rule (NCR)

The NCR functions as a crucial anti-avoidance and compliance mechanism, primarily designed to prevent the unauthorized stacking of incentives, commonly referred to as “double-dipping” [8]. The rule’s core purpose is to ensure that a single dollar of corporate expenditure is subsidized by the state only once. The rule mandates that while companies may be eligible for several incentives under Act 182, they cannot apply the same expenditure to satisfy the qualified costs for more than one benefit [9].

The fundamental principle governing this mandate is one of exclusive expenditure [1]. The combination rule emphasizes that the higher 33% rate available to Targeted Businesses and strategic research is prioritized through strategic segmentation. By forcing companies to elect a single R&D pathway (20% incremental vs. 33% targeted), the state directs the highest incentive rate toward defined, economically crucial activities [5].

II. The Statutory Foundation: Exclusive Use of Expenditures (ACA § 15-4-2712)

The legal enforcement of the Non-Combination Rule is codified primarily in the Arkansas Code Annotated (ACA) § 15-4-2712, which governs the combination of incentives under the Consolidated Incentive Act of 2003.

2.1 General Rule of Permissibility and the Critical Statutory Exception

ACA § 15-4-2712(a) broadly states that, except as provided in subsection (b), the incentives established by the subchapter may be combined [9, 10]. This general allowance for combination is immediately limited by the critical exception detailed in subsection (b).

The specific prohibitions contained within subsection (b) are the decisive constraints, ensuring that “multiple incentives are not claimed for the same expenditures” [9]. This precise language confirms that the legal compliance threshold is not judged merely at the company or project level, but at the individual expenditure. This mandates rigorous, forensic-level tracking of costs, such as employee time cards and specific invoices, to prove that costs are segregated and exclusive to the claimed benefit.

2.2 Internal Non-Combination: R&D Program Mutual Exclusivity

The statute and associated rules enforce strict mutual exclusivity among the primary in-house R&D programs. The incentives for in-house research—which target mature firms, targeted firms, and emerging firms—”may not be combined with one another” [2, 4]. This compels a mandatory election between program types for any given set of QREs.

Administrative rules further clarify this election, specifying that a qualified business claiming the Targeted Business R&D credit (§ 15-4-2708(b)) is explicitly prohibited from receiving the credit granted by the general In-House R&D credit (§ 15-4-2708(a)) for the same QREs [2]. This means that a business must commit to a single, exclusive R&D tax pathway (e.g., the 20% incremental credit or the 33% targeted credit) based on its status and research project type. This choice, typically formalized during the AEDC application process, defines the eligibility of those expenditures for the duration of the five-year financial incentive agreement term [4].

2.3 External Non-Combination: R&D vs. Other Act 182 Incentives

The NCR strictly prohibits combining R&D credits with non-R&D benefits from the Consolidated Incentive Act (Act 182) when the underlying costs overlap. The most frequent area of overlap and potential violation involves payroll costs used for both R&D and job creation.

A targeted business earning R&D tax credits is specifically prohibited from earning job creation tax credits, authorized by § 15-4-2709, for the same expenditure [6]. The prohibition is broad, extending to combining R&D credits with any other incentive in Act 182 of 2003 for the identical QREs [2, 11]. For example, if an employee’s salary is utilized to calculate the R&D credit, that salary cannot also be claimed as part of the payroll computation for the Advantage Arkansas Job Creation Tax Credit [12]. The integrity of the state’s incentive structure depends on this strict requirement that costs used for R&D credit purposes must be precisely distinguished and allocated.

III. Administrative Guidance: The Prohibition on Deductions (DFA Rule 2.1.7)

The Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration (DFA) implements a second critical layer of non-combination by restricting the ability of taxpayers to claim state tax deductions for expenses used to generate a credit.

3.1 DFA’s Authority and the Statutory Basis

The DFA and the Arkansas Science & Technology Authority (ASTA) prescribe rules under Act 759 of 1985 governing the R&D credit utilization [13, 14]. This administrative guidance is essential for providing the operational procedures necessary to enforce the NCR on the state income tax return. The primary goal is to ensure that the R&D benefit flows exclusively through the credit mechanism.

3.2 Analysis of Rule 2.1.7: The Deduction Disallowance

Rule 2.1.7 of the R&D Tax Credit Program Rules explicitly mandates the deduction disallowance: “Any person claiming any credit granted by Act 759 of 1985… for any expense, or contribution, or sale below cost shall not take any deduction under the Arkansas Income Tax Law for the same expense or contribution” [13, 15].

This rule establishes critical financial neutrality by preventing a “double benefit.” If a taxpayer were allowed to deduct the QREs (reducing taxable income) and then also claim a tax credit based on those same expenditures (reducing tax liability), the state subsidy would be compounded beyond legislative intent [15]. The deduction disallowance demonstrates a commitment to strict financial consistency, ensuring the state treasury only recognizes the financial outflow associated with the credit itself.

3.3 Mandatory State Tax Adjustments

In practice, adherence to DFA Rule 2.1.7 requires taxpayers to perform a mandatory state add-back adjustment on their Arkansas income tax return. Taxpayers must remove the specific Qualified Research Expenditures utilized in the calculation of the state R&D tax credit from the state’s computation of taxable income [13].

Since Arkansas’s definition of QREs is generally narrower than the federal definition—focusing primarily on salaries—the required add-back only applies to those specific, claimed expenses [4, 5]. This administrative requirement provides the necessary tax filing guidance to enforce the Non-Combination Rule and safeguard the integrity of the state incentive programs.

IV. Strategic Exceptions and Permissible Stacking

While the NCR imposes strict prohibitions, Arkansas law strategically permits the combination of certain incentives, provided the expenditures are rigorously separated.

4.1 The University Research Combination Exception

One key area where combination is specifically allowed is for collaborative research. The incentives for in-house research (both 20% and 33%) “may be combined with incentives for research with universities” [2, 4]. This policy actively promotes institutional collaboration, treating expenses paid externally to universities (which also offer a 33% credit) as separate and stackable from QREs associated with internal corporate payroll.

4.2 Permissible Stacking for Targeted Businesses (ACA § 15-4-2712(b))

Targeted businesses have the unique flexibility to combine multiple benefits from the Consolidated Incentive Act for the same project, provided the expense segregation test is strictly met [9].

ACA § 15-4-2712(b) confirms that the Research and Development Income Tax Credits (§ 15-4-2708(b)) may be combined with specific incentives, provided there is no overlap in the underlying costs:

1. Investment Tax Credits (ITC): R&D credits may be combined with the ITC authorized under § 15-4-2706(b)(7) [9]. This combination is usually compliant because R&D QREs primarily consist of wages, whereas ITCs cover capital expenditures, such as machinery and equipment [4, 13].
2. Payroll Incentives: The R&D credit can be combined with either the Payroll Rebate Program (§ 15-4-2707(e)) or the Payroll Tax Credit Program (§ 15-4-2709) [10]. Compliance here is the most nuanced, demanding that the wages used to calculate the R&D credit must be entirely different from the wages used for the payroll incentive; the payroll pools must be allocated and separated [9].

The ability for targeted businesses to stack incentives for the “same project” requires meticulous cost accounting to satisfy the anti-avoidance mandate of “not claimed for the same expenditures.”

V. Practical Compliance and Risk Mitigation

Effective management of the Arkansas R&D credit requires proactive compliance measures, beginning with the pre-approval phase and extending through detailed accounting procedures.

5.1 Pre-Approval and the AEDC Project Plan

All R&D tax credits in Arkansas are granted at the discretion of the AEDC Executive Director and require a formal application and approval process [6, 7]. The Research and Development application and project plan serve as the basis for the Commission’s decision to approve tax credit treatment [2].

For compliance with the NCR, the project plan must clearly delineate the intent of the project, the specific expenditures planned, and the start and end dates of the project [6]. Crucially, for multi-incentive projects, this documentation must detail how QREs are calculated and allocated to ensure separation from other claimed incentives, such as those related to capital investment (ITC). Successful approval results in a Certificate of Tax Credit, which must be filed with the taxpayer’s return [2].

5.2 Implementing Strict Cost Segregation

The primary compliance challenge associated with the NCR is the internal allocation of employee wages, which constitute the majority of Arkansas R&D QREs [5]. Since R&D QREs are limited to wages for those engaging in, supervising, or directly supporting qualified research [4], businesses seeking to stack R&D credits with job creation incentives must establish rigorous internal controls to separate the payroll pools.

To successfully navigate the NCR, businesses must maintain detailed, contemporaneous records, such as time tracking systems, to allocate wages into separate expenditure pools: one exclusively for R&D credit calculation, and another exclusively for job creation credit calculation. Wages associated with general administrative services or activities only indirectly beneficial to research cannot be included in the R&D QRE pool [4]. The failure of accounting separation is the primary risk factor for audit adjustments concerning disallowed “double-dipping” benefits.

VI. Detailed Compliance Example: Segregation of Dual-Purpose Costs

This section provides a detailed example to illustrate the practical application of the NCR and the enforcement of DFA Rule 2.1.7.

6.1 Scenario: AgroTech Solutions (Targeted Business)

AgroTech Solutions, an established firm in the agricultural technology sector (a Designated Targeted Business), undertook a project in 2024 to develop a new, automated drone system. The company received AEDC approval to utilize both the 33% Targeted Business R&D credit and the Job Creation Tax Credit (JCTC) under Act 182.

• Total 2024 Payroll for New Hires: $\$700,000$.
• $450,000 of this payroll was paid to R&D Engineers and their first-line manager for qualified research services.
• $250,000 of this payroll was paid to new Sales and Administrative staff, whose duties did not qualify as R&D activities.

6.2 Application of the Non-Combination Rule

AgroTech is mandated to ensure that the $\$450,000$ in R&D QREs is not claimed for any other Act 182 incentive [6].

1. R&D Credit Calculation: AgroTech claims the R&D credit solely on the R&D QRE Pool:
   
   $$\$450,000 \times 33\% = \$148,500 \text{ R\&D Credit}$$
2. JCTC Calculation: AgroTech claims the JCTC solely on the Non-R&D Payroll Pool:
   
   $$\text{JCTC Calculation Base} = \$250,000$$

By rigidly segregating the payroll into two distinct pools based on the nature of the work performed, AgroTech successfully combines incentives for the same overall project without claiming the same dollar of expenditure for multiple benefits, thereby satisfying ACA § 15-4-2712(b).

6.3 DFA Deduction Compliance (Rule 2.1.7)

Since AgroTech utilized $\$450,000$ in qualified expenses to generate the state tax credit, it must adhere to DFA Rule 2.1.7 [13, 15].

AgroTech must perform a mandatory state add-back adjustment of $\$450,000$ on its Arkansas corporate income tax return. This adjustment neutralizes the benefit of deducting these QREs on the state return, ensuring that the company’s sole benefit is the $\$148,500$ tax credit, consistent with the state’s anti-double-dipping requirements [13].

Table 4 details the compliant payroll allocation.

Table 4. Segregation of Payroll for Dual Incentives Compliance

VII. Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

The Arkansas Non-Combination Rule is a rigorous and comprehensive compliance structure, enforced through statutory law (ACA § 15-4-2712) and explicit administrative guidance (DFA Rule 2.1.7). Its purpose is to ensure that state incentives are maximized through strategic choice and precise accounting, rather than simple benefit layering.

The operational complexity arises from the necessity to separate payroll used for the high-value 33% R&D credit from payroll used for job creation incentives. This means that cost accounting is the primary defense against audit risk and must reflect the strict definition of “qualified services” as outlined by the AEDC.

Key Compliance Focus Areas for Practitioners

To navigate the intricacies of the NCR, tax practitioners and corporate controllers should focus on three strategic areas:

1. Strategic Election: A business must conduct a rigorous pre-filing analysis to elect the single, most advantageous R&D incentive pathway (20% incremental vs. 33% targeted). This election is critical because the in-house R&D programs are mutually exclusive for the same QREs.
2. Forensic Cost Segregation: Implementation of detailed, contemporaneous time and expenditure tracking systems is mandatory to differentiate QREs used for R&D credits from wages used for Job Creation/Rebates. The legal trigger for non-compliance is the use of the “same expenditure,” necessitating sophisticated segregation to demonstrate compliance with ACA § 15-4-2712(b).
3. Deduction Disallowance: Consistent adherence to DFA Rule 2.1.7 is required. The mandatory state income tax add-back adjustment must be properly executed for all QREs utilized in calculating the state tax credit to prevent the unauthorized stacking of credit and deduction benefits.

Companies, especially Targeted Businesses, should strategically leverage the permitted combinations—such as combining R&D wages with separate capital Investment Tax Credits or university collaborations—to maximize overall state support while rigidly maintaining separate, auditable expenditure pools.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/