Navigating Arkansas’s Research and Development Tax Credit: Defining the Qualified Research Program (QRP)

A Qualified Research Program (QRP) in Arkansas refers to state-approved research activities designed to discover technological information aimed at improving a new or existing business component, requiring alignment with the rigorous Federal R&D tax criteria. It forms the statutory basis for claiming various state income tax credits, requiring mandatory, prospective pre-approval from the Arkansas Economic Development Commission (AEDC) and subsequent certification from the Arkansas Science and Technology Authority (ASTA) before the expenditure is recognized by the Department of Finance and Administration (DFA).

The state of Arkansas utilizes its Research and Development tax credit programs as a strategic tool to spur economic development, specifically targeting university-based research, in-house research, and R&D conducted within technology-based enterprises and startups.1 For companies engaged in innovation within the state, securing the benefits of these incentives requires more than simply conducting scientific investigation; it demands meticulous adherence to a multi-tiered regulatory process centered around the definition and pre-approval of the QRP. The complexity arises from the interplay between state economic development policy, federal tax law (IRC Section 41), and the specific procedural mandates set forth by Arkansas revenue and technology agencies. This report details the precise definition of the QRP, the statutory criteria required for qualification, the roles of state administrative bodies, and the financial requirements necessary for successful compliance.

Section 1: The Statutory Foundation of Qualified Research in Arkansas: Defining the QRP

1.1 The Crux of Qualification: QRP in Arkansas Law (ACA §26-51-1102)

Arkansas legislation frames its R&D incentives to support broad state economic goals by segmenting incentives into various programs tailored to different corporate maturity levels—such as mature firms, younger “targeted” firms, and emerging enterprises engaged in strategic R&D.2 To qualify for any of these state R&D tax credits, a business must demonstrate that its activities meet the statutory definition of qualified research. This definition, while mirroring much of the federal structure, carries distinct requirements that businesses must satisfy.

The core of eligibility rests on the definition of qualified research activities (QRAs). For a project to be recognized as part of a QRP, it must satisfy three explicit tests.1 These tests collectively ensure that the research is fundamentally technological, commercially purposeful, and conducted using a verifiable, systematic methodology.

1.1.1 Test 1: Technological in Nature (Discovery Requirement)

The primary requirement is that the activity must be undertaken for the purpose of discovering information which is technological in nature.1 This criterion mandates that the research must fundamentally rely on the principles of physical or biological science, engineering, or computer science.3 Routine data collection, market research, or the simple application of readily known or established principles fails to meet this definition. The state seeks to reward attempts to advance scientific or technical knowledge through formal investigation.

1.1.2 Test 2: Utility in a New or Improved Business Component (Purpose Requirement)

Secondly, the application of the technological information discovered must be intended to be useful in the new or improved business component.1 This establishes the commercial and functional purpose of the research. The goal of the QRP must be to enhance the functionality, performance, reliability, or quality of the business component under development or improvement.3 This linkage prevents the claiming of credits for pure theoretical research that lacks a tangible, practical objective for the taxpayer’s trade or business.

1.1.3 Test 3: Substantially All Activities Constitute a Process of Experimentation

The third and perhaps most demanding statutory requirement is that substantially all of the activities related to the research effort must constitute elements of a process of experimentation.1 A process of experimentation involves systematic trial-and-error, testing, modeling, simulating, and engaging in verifiable procedures designed to evaluate and refine hypotheses.3 The use of the phrase “substantially all” demands exceptional documentation from the taxpayer. If administrative, non-experimental tasks exceed a minimal threshold within the project component, the state may disallow the entire component of the QRP. This standard mandates that a rigorous, documented development methodology must be maintained throughout the research period.

1.2 Federal Linkage: The Inescapable IRS 4-Part Test Compliance

A crucial layer of complexity in Arkansas’s R&D tax policy is its explicit linkage to the federal credit. State law requires that businesses conduct research that “qualifies for federal research and development tax credits”.1 Since federal qualification requires satisfying the IRS’s 4-part test under Section 41, Arkansas effectively enforces the federal standard, even though its statute only lists three points.

The mandatory federal alignment means that failure to satisfy the federal requirements immediately negates the state credit. This incorporates two further implicit tests into the Arkansas QRP definition:

1. Elimination of Uncertainty Test: The activities must be intended to discover information that could eliminate technical uncertainty concerning the development or improvement of a product.3 This is the crucial federal threshold defining technical risk.
2. Section 174 Deduction Eligibility: The expenditure must be eligible for a Section 174 deduction.5 This criterion ensures the research is conducted within the United States and is not related to certain excluded activities (such as funded research or research related to adaptation).

For compliance purposes, companies must view the Arkansas criteria as a subset of, and entirely dependent upon, the broader federal requirements.

Table 2: Arkansas Qualified Research Tests vs. Federal 4-Part Test

1.3 Qualifying Activities and Common Exclusions

The services related to the QRP that are eligible for inclusion are tightly defined. These include engaging in the actual conduct of qualified research, engaging in the direct supervision (first-line management) of research, and engaging in the direct support of research activities.2 Direct support activities, such as maintaining research equipment or compiling research data, typically qualify.6

However, the state clearly limits what constitutes qualified service by explicitly excluding general administrative services or other services only indirectly beneficial to the research activity.2 This exclusion necessitates businesses maintain granular time-tracking mechanisms to demonstrate that time reported against the QRP was spent on direct execution, supervision, or support of the experimental process, and not on general overhead or routine functions.

Section 2: Qualified Research Expenditures (QREs) – The Narrow Financial Definition

The definition of a Qualified Research Expenditure (QRE) under Arkansas law is significantly narrower than the federal definition, representing a critical distinction for financial planning and state tax compliance.

2.1 Defining QREs and DFA’s Financial Oversight

QREs are defined as the sum of any amounts paid by a taxpayer during the taxable year in funding a qualified research program, provided these amounts have been approved for tax credit treatment under rules and regulations promulgated by the Department of Finance and Administration (DFA).7 This definition establishes that while the AEDC and ASTA govern the scientific and economic eligibility of the program, the DFA holds the ultimate administrative authority over the financial claim. A properly approved QRP that fails to meet the strict DFA expenditure rules will be rejected for credit purposes.7

2.2 The Restricted Scope: Focus on Taxable Wages and Salaries

The most crucial financial difference from federal law is the restriction on the type of expenditures that qualify for the credit. For In-House R&D programs, the credit is explicitly stated to be 20% of qualified R&D salaries.2 The state explicitly mandates that supplies, equipment, and buildings do not qualify for the In-House R&D credit.2

This represents a deliberate policy decision by Arkansas to structure its R&D credit as a job creation incentive rather than a comprehensive reimbursement of general R&D costs. Consequently, companies calculating their federal R&D credit (which includes supplies, certain equipment usage, and 65% of contract research costs) must perform a highly restricted second calculation specifically for the Arkansas claim, focusing solely on qualified wages paid to full-time permanent or contractual employees performing qualified services.1

2.3 Exceptions for University-Based Research

The state offers a single significant exception to its wage-only rule: expenditures related to research conducted in partnership with Arkansas higher education institutions. An eligible business that contracts with one or more Arkansas colleges or universities in performing research may qualify for a 33% income tax credit.1

Crucially, QREs related to university partnerships can include certain donations or sales below cost of new machinery and equipment used in connection with a QRP at a qualified educational institution.2 This exception incentivizes the flow of private sector capital into Arkansas’s academic R&D infrastructure, allowing businesses to claim a credit for capital assets provided to support state-affiliated scientific endeavors.

Section 3: State Revenue Office Guidance and Multi-Agency Approval: The Compliance Workflow

The Arkansas R&D tax credit is distinct due to its rigorous, multi-agency pre-approval process. Compliance is defined less by a year-end calculation and more by proactive negotiation and contractual agreement with state bodies.

3.1 The Arkansas Economic Development Commission (AEDC) Mandate: Discretion and Prospective Approval

The process begins and is constrained by the AEDC. The state statute allows tax credits to be offered at the discretion of the AEDC Executive Director.1 This discretionary element means that eligibility is not purely formulaic; it is subject to the state’s judgment regarding the project’s economic impact and alignment with state goals.

3.1.1 The Absolute Necessity of Prospective Pre-Approval

The paramount compliance constraint for businesses is the requirement for prospective approval. A taxpayer seeking a credit must submit an original application and a project plan to the AEDC Executive Director.9 If approved, the applicant shall sign a financial incentive agreement with the AEDC.9

The state guidance explicitly dictates that this financial incentive agreement must be signed before the taxpayer makes the donation or expenditure. Furthermore, an expenditure made before the approval date of the signed financial incentive agreement shall be denied a credit under the program.9 This regulation transforms R&D planning into a mandatory contractual negotiation process. Financial officers must ensure that internal R&D budgeting and execution are inextricably linked to the timely submission and execution of the AEDC contract, as QREs cannot be retroactively qualified.

3.1.2 AEDC Review and Project Plan Requirements

The AEDC relies heavily on the taxpayer’s initial submission. The application must include a detailed project plan which clearly identifies the intent of the project, the planned expenditures, the start and end dates of the project, and an estimate of total project costs.1 This comprehensive plan forms the basis for the Commission’s decision to approve tax credit treatment for the expenditures.2 The AEDC reviews the application, and the Executive Director will either approve the application or reject it and notify the applicant of deficiencies.9

3.2 The Arkansas Science and Technology Authority (ASTA) and ADHE: Certifying the QRP

Following AEDC approval, the QRP enters the scientific certification stage involving the Arkansas Science and Technology Authority (ASTA) and the Arkansas Department of Higher Education (ADHE).

State administrative guidance requires that the AEDC Executive Director and the Director of the Division of Higher Education must jointly approve a qualified research expenditure as part of a qualified research program.9 This step validates that the research is scientifically meritorious and aligns with state educational and scientific advancement goals, as outlined in Act 759 of 1985 which supports research and educational programs at Arkansas colleges and universities.7

Ultimately, the taxpayer must provide a statement from ASTA confirming that ADHE and ASTA have approved the expenditure as part of a QRP.8 This statement results in the issuance of a Certificate of Tax Credit by ASTA, which is the definitive document required for claiming the credit with the tax authorities.8

3.3 The Department of Finance and Administration (DFA) Role: Claiming the Credit

The DFA is the final authority in recognizing the tax benefits. Its role is primarily procedural and focused on verification. To claim the credits authorized, the taxpayer must attach a copy of the Certificate of Tax Credit issued by ASTA to the state tax return.8

For corporate entities or partnerships, this involves filing the appropriate state tax forms, such as Form AR1050 for partnerships.11 The DFA requires careful calculation of state-level adjustments, such as those related to differences between federal and Arkansas depreciation or capital gain basis adjustments, before the certified credit can be applied against the calculated tax liability.12 The DFA enforces the rule that the expenditure must have been approved by AEDC/ASTA/ADHE as part of a QRP.8

Section 4: Categorizing Qualified Research Programs and Incentives

Arkansas offers distinct QRP incentives tailored to different business profiles, providing varying credit rates and eligibility thresholds. Incentives generally may not be combined with one another for the same expenditures (e.g., In-House R&D cannot be stacked with the Targeted Business credit).2

4.1 Program Overview and Financial Structure

Arkansas structures its incentives into four main categories, each with specific requirements for the QRE calculation:

4.1.1 In-House R&D Tax Credit (Standard 20%)

This program is designed for mature companies performing ongoing, qualified in-house research.2 The credit allowed is 20% of qualified research expenditures that exceed the baseline expenditure established in the preceding year.1 For a new facility, the base year is zero for the first three years following the financial incentive agreement.4 However, this program is subject to a strict annual cap: the maximum credit that can be earned by a business is $10,000 per tax year.13

4.1.2 Targeted Business R&D Tax Credit (33%)

This credit targets younger firms engaged in in-house research.1 To qualify as a Targeted Business, companies must meet several high thresholds, including showing proof of an equity investment of at least $250,000 and paying at least 150% of the lesser of the state or county average hourly wage.14 This program offers a significantly higher rate of 33% of QREs.1 Crucially, the QREs for the Targeted Business credit are calculated on a flat rate for a period of five years, with no subtraction of a prior year baseline expenditure required.13

4.1.3 Strategic Value R&D Tax Credit (33%)

This credit focuses on research in fields identified as having long-term economic or commercial value to the state, as determined in an R&D plan approved by the AEDC/ASTA.4 The credit rate is 33% of QREs.4 Similar to the standard In-House program, this incentive is subject to a maximum credit of $50,000 per taxpayer per year.8

4.1.4 University-Based R&D Tax Credit (33%)

This program supports collaboration, offering a 33% income tax credit for qualified research expenditures contracted with Arkansas colleges or universities.1 This incentive is critical as it is the only one allowing the inclusion of new machinery and equipment in the QRE base.2

Table 3: Comparison of Arkansas R&D Tax Credit Programs

4.2 Credit Utilization and Carryforward Rules

A significant advantage of the Arkansas R&D tax credits is their ability to offset up to 100% of a business’s annual income tax liability.1 Unused credits may be carried forward for a maximum of nine years beyond the year in which the credit was first earned.1 This lengthy carryforward period is particularly beneficial for high-growth technology firms and startups that may incur substantial QREs while reporting operating losses or minimal taxable income in their initial years.

The Targeted Business credit is often considered the most powerful incentive due to the high rate (33%) and the absence of a baseline requirement. Unlike the Standard In-House ($10,000 cap) and Strategic Value ($50,000 cap) programs, the Targeted Business credit allows for maximization of tax relief for high-growth firms without a stated monetary cap on the credit amount.1

Section 5: Practical Example: Modeling a Qualified Research Program and Compliance Workflow

To illustrate the procedural and financial demands of the Arkansas QRP, a case study involving a Targeted Business is highly instructive, demonstrating how strict adherence to the prospective approval rule governs the final credit amount.

5.1 Case Study Setup: OmniTech Robotics (A Targeted Business)

OmniTech Robotics is a high-tech manufacturing firm that meets the state criteria for a Targeted Business, demonstrating an equity investment over $250,000 and paying wages at 150% of the county average.14

QRP Goal: The company’s QRP involves developing proprietary autonomous warehouse sorting software. This research activity satisfies the three statutory criteria: it relies on computer science (technological nature), it intends to improve warehouse efficiency (utility in business component), and it involves systematic testing and beta modeling (process of experimentation).1

Financial Outlook: For the 2024 tax year, OmniTech budgets $750,000 in qualifying R&D salaries (QREs). The company expects a state income tax liability of $150,000.

5.2 Phase I: Navigating the Prospective Pre-Approval Timing Trap

OmniTech began R&D activities immediately on January 1, 2024, but submitted its formal application and detailed Project Plan to the AEDC only on March 1, 2024. The AEDC Executive Director reviewed the submission, and the Financial Incentive Agreement was ultimately signed on April 1, 2024.9

The critical compliance constraint is the timing: QREs made before the approval date of the signed financial incentive agreement must be denied.9

• QREs Incurred Jan 1 – Mar 31: $250,000 (1/4 of the total planned salary expenditure).
• QREs Incurred Apr 1 – Dec 31 (Post-Agreement): $500,000.

Due to the mandatory prospective approval rule, OmniTech must exclude the $250,000 incurred prior to April 1st, regardless of the quality of the research.

Eligible QREs for 2024: $500,000

5.3 Phase II: Calculation and Certification

Because OmniTech qualifies as a Targeted Business, it benefits from the 33% credit rate applied to its eligible QREs, with no base expenditure subtraction required.1

• Approved QREs (post-agreement): $500,000
• Credit Rate: 33%
• Calculated Credit: $\$500,000 \times 0.33 = \textbf{\$165,000}$

OmniTech submits its QRE documentation and compliance report to ASTA/ADHE, which verifies the research execution against the pre-approved QRP plan. ASTA subsequently issues a Certificate of Tax Credit for $165,000.8

5.4 Phase III: DFA Reporting and Utilization

When filing its Arkansas income tax return, OmniTech attaches the Certificate of Tax Credit issued by ASTA.8

• State Income Tax Liability: $150,000
• Available Tax Credit: $165,000
• Credit Utilization: The $165,000 credit offsets the entire $150,000 tax liability (100% offset allowed).1
• Carryforward: The unused credit of $15,000 ($165,000 – $150,000) is automatically carried forward for up to nine subsequent tax years.1

This example highlights that while the Targeted Business program offers maximum financial leverage (high rate, no baseline, high utilization potential), the most significant risk is not the R&D activity itself, but the administrative failure to secure pre-approval from the AEDC before commencing the expenditures.

Conclusion: Strategic Compliance and Maximizing Arkansas Incentives

The Arkansas Qualified Research Program is a sophisticated mechanism intended to drive state-level innovation and employment by offering substantial income tax credits. The statutory definition of the QRP is fundamentally tied to the principles of technological discovery, utility in commercial components, and a verifiable process of experimentation, underpinned by mandatory compliance with the federal 4-part R&D test.

However, the effective monetization of the credit relies heavily on navigating the administrative workflow established by the state’s economic and tax authorities. The QRP is defined not only by technological activity but by strategic administrative alignment across three state agencies: the discretionary approval and timing mandates of the AEDC, the scientific validation of ASTA/ADHE, and the procedural enforcement of the DFA.

The most critical factor in maximizing the Arkansas R&D credit is the prospective nature of compliance. Failure to secure the AEDC Financial Incentive Agreement before incurring Qualified Research Expenditures is the single most common and costly failure point. Given the state’s restrictive definition of QREs (focusing narrowly on taxable wages and salaries for in-house research), corporations must proactively assess their eligibility for specialized, high-benefit programs, such as the Targeted Business or Strategic Value credits, to capture the maximum 33% credit rate, ensuring R&D activities translate efficiently into direct state tax savings.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/