Technical Analysis of the Arkansas Strategic Research and Development Income Tax Credit

The Arkansas Strategic Research and Development (R&D) Income Tax Credit provides a 33% income tax credit for in-house research expenditures in fields deemed crucial for the state’s economic future. This incentive is discretionary, capped at $50,000 annually, and specifically targets emerging technology firms committed to research aligned with long-term state economic goals.

This report offers a comprehensive examination of the Strategic R&D Tax Credit, detailing its legislative context, specialized compliance requirements for Qualified Research Expenditures (QREs), administrative guidance from the Arkansas Economic Development Commission (AEDC) and the Department of Finance and Administration (DFA), and practical financial modeling for maximizing the incentive’s value. The analysis is structured to provide financial executives and tax compliance teams with the detailed information necessary for successful application and utilization of this program.

Section I: Statutory and Administrative Foundations of Strategic R&D

The Strategic R&D Tax Credit is one of the highest-value incentives in the state’s portfolio, providing a premium credit rate in exchange for strict adherence to state economic development goals. The framework is governed by the Consolidated Incentive Act of 2003.

I.A. Legislative Mandate: Ark. Code Ann. § 15-4-2708

The primary legal authority for this program is found in the Arkansas Code, specifically Ark. Code Ann. § 15-4-2708(c).1 This legislation outlines the criteria for businesses seeking the incentive and defines the mandatory structural limitations.

The incentive is explicitly designed for “emerging firms engaged in strategic research and development over limited five-year periods”.2 This focus ensures that state resources are directed toward cultivating new, technology-based enterprises that have the potential for high growth, rather than broadly subsidizing established industrial research.

A critical feature of the Strategic R&D program is its discretionary nature. The credit may be offered only “at the discretion of the director” of the Arkansas Economic Development Commission (AEDC).1 This requirement means that qualification is not guaranteed merely by meeting statutory criteria; the applicant must also demonstrate that the proposed research aligns with the state’s current economic agenda and that the project merits governmental support. This administrative control serves as a rigorous vetting mechanism, ensuring that public investment in R&D contributes directly to knowledge-based job creation objectives.4

The program imposes a strict time limit on eligibility. The financial incentive agreement, once signed, establishes a five-year term, beginning on the first day of the business’s tax year in which the agreement is executed.1 This firm five-year window encourages prompt execution and measurable results from the strategic research.

I.B. Defining “Area of Strategic Value” (ASTA Authority)

The definition of “strategic value” is the core compliance requirement for this incentive. Research must occur in fields having “long-term economic or commercial value to the state”.3 However, this definition is not self-determined by the taxpayer. The specific eligible fields must be formally identified in the research and development plan approved periodically by the Board of Directors of the Arkansas Science and Technology Authority (ASTA).3

Because the strategic areas are identified “from time to time” by the ASTA Board, businesses must actively monitor and confirm that their proposed research aligns with the most current state economic development plan. This introduces a temporal risk for businesses engaged in long-term R&D projects, as eligibility is tied to the state’s evolving economic priorities. The state uses this policy flexibility to pivot its incentives toward sectors requiring the most immediate or long-term growth support.

Current ASTA planning emphasizes investment in critical technologies and growth sectors, reflecting the state’s commitment to building a competitive knowledge economy. Examples of recently identified strategic sectors include:

• Advanced Energy, including the emerging Lithium sector.5
• Steel manufacturing and related technologies.5
• Advanced Agriculture and Resilient Food Production systems.5
• Next Generation Transportation and Logistics solutions.5
• Population Health research and development initiatives.5

This structure establishes the Strategic R&D credit as a direct instrument of state economic policy, managed through discretionary authority. The application process thus serves as a governmental filter to ensure that subsidized research funding contributes directly to the state’s defined high-technology and job growth goals.4

Section II: Core Mechanics of the 33% Strategic Credit

The Strategic R&D credit offers a substantial 33% rate on qualified expenditures, designed to provide a high return on investment for research that aligns with state priorities. However, this high rate is balanced by strict limitations on the total credit amount.

II.A. Credit Calculation and Annual Maximum

The income tax credit is calculated as thirty-three percent (33%) of the amount spent on qualified research expenditures (QREs).3 This rate is significantly higher than the standard 20% incremental credit available to mature companies, signifying the state’s heightened prioritization of strategic research efforts.3

However, the defining limitation of the Strategic R&D credit is the rigid annual cap. The maximum tax credit that a taxpayer may claim under this specific program is limited to $50,000 per tax year.1 This limitation applies specifically to in-house research in an area of strategic value.

The combination of the high percentage rate and the low maximum cap reveals a specific policy intent: the state aims to maximize the impact of the incentive on smaller firms or specific, high-priority research projects. To reach the full annual credit of $50,000, a firm must incur only approximately $151,515 in QREs ($\frac{\$50,000}{0.33} \approx \$151,515$). Expenditures beyond this threshold, while potentially contributing to the overall R&D project, do not yield additional credit under this program, emphasizing efficiency and focused investment for the taxpayer.

II.B. Credit Utilization and Carryforward Rules

The utilization provisions for the credit significantly enhance its value, especially for emerging firms that often operate at a loss during their research and development phases.

The credit may be used to offset up to one hundred percent (100%) of the business’s Arkansas income tax liability annually.1 This total offset capacity provides substantial tax relief once a firm becomes profitable.

Furthermore, any unused credits—a highly likely scenario for emerging technology firms during their initial years of operation—may be carried forward and claimed in succeeding tax years for an extended period of nine (9) years.3 This provision ensures that the value of the credit is preserved and available to offset future income tax obligations, effectively providing a long-term reduction in the effective state tax rate once profitability is achieved.

Finally, the state enforces an anti-double-benefit rule common in income tax law. A company claiming the R&D credit for any expense is prohibited from taking a corresponding deduction under Arkansas income tax law for the same expenditure or contribution.8 Taxpayers must elect whether to receive the credit benefit or the deduction benefit for the qualifying expenditure.

Section III: Qualified Research Expenditures (QREs) Compliance

Compliance for the Arkansas R&D credit requires adherence to a definition of Qualified Research Expenditures (QREs) that is significantly narrower than the federal standard. This difference is critical for accurate calculation and audit readiness.

III.A. The Narrow Definition of Arkansas QREs

To be eligible for the state credit, the underlying research must first satisfy the strict requirements of the Federal 4-Part Test, based on the definition of qualified research found in Internal Revenue Code (IRC) § 41.9 This includes criteria such as technological nature, uncertainty resolution, and a formal process of experimentation.

However, Arkansas specifically defines its eligible QREs more narrowly than the federal program, particularly regarding the types of costs included.7 For the in-house Strategic R&D credit, the qualified expenditures are primarily limited to qualified salaries and wages.2

Specific cost categories are explicitly excluded from the Arkansas QRE calculation, representing a crucial difference from federal tax planning:

• Supplies consumed during the research process.2
• The cost or depreciation related to equipment used in the research.2
• Costs associated with buildings or land.2

The exclusion of capital and supply costs reflects a focused state policy objective. By limiting eligibility almost entirely to qualified wages, the state is prioritizing the incentive toward the retention and employment of high-skilled R&D personnel within Arkansas.2 This policy emphasizes job creation and the development of local human capital over the subsidy of large capital equipment purchases or raw materials.

III.B. Defining Qualified Services (Wages)

Given the narrow QRE definition, detailed time tracking and precise allocation of employee wages are paramount for compliance. QREs include the taxable wages and usual fringe benefits paid to full-time permanent employees or contractual employees.3

These wages qualify only if the employee performs services that fall squarely into one of three statutorily defined categories 2:

1. Engaging in qualified research: This encompasses the actual, hands-on conduct of the technical research or experimentation.
2. Engaging in the direct supervision of qualified research: This means the immediate supervision, typically at the first-line management level, of those performing the qualified research.
3. Engaging in the direct support of research activities: This category covers activities that provide direct support to the qualified research process.

Critically, direct support activities specifically do not include general administrative services or other services that only indirectly benefit the research activity.2 Consequently, auditors place heavy scrutiny on documentation that allocates employee time to these three qualified functions, requiring robust systems for tracking project time and expense allocation.

The table below summarizes the key differences in QRE eligibility between the state and federal R&D incentives, illustrating why separate calculations are required for Arkansas tax purposes.

Qualified Research Expenditure (QRE) Comparison: Strategic R&D vs. Federal IRC § 41

Section IV: Local State Revenue Office Guidance and Application

The process of securing the Strategic R&D Tax Credit involves two distinct stages administered by different state agencies: the initial project approval phase managed by the AEDC and the subsequent tax filing phase managed by the DFA.

IV.A. The Project Phase: AEDC and ASTA Requirements

The program is administered by the Arkansas Economic Development Commission (AEDC) Science & Technology Division.3 Before a company submits an application for the state credit, it must already be involved in the Federal R&D program.2

The most critical element of the application is the Project Plan. This plan must be detailed and comprehensive, clearly identifying the project’s intent, the specific expenditures planned, the projected start and end dates, and an estimate of total project costs.2 This documentation serves as the basis for the Commission’s decision to approve tax credit treatment, functioning as a high-level administrative gatekeeper to ensure only projects promising significant long-term economic returns are awarded the incentive.2 The application process requires the firm to proactively present the state with a compelling case regarding the economic benefits of their project before any tax savings can be realized.

Timeline compliance is essential. Applications for the credit must be submitted 45 days prior to the company’s tax year end date to allow adequate time for application review and necessary follow-up by the AEDC.2 Upon approval, the application and project plan constitute the financial incentive agreement, which locks in the five-year term of the incentive.1

IV.B. The Tax Filing Phase: DFA Compliance

Once the AEDC grants approval for the research program, the tax component is handled by the Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration (DFA).

To formally claim the credit on a tax return, the taxpayer must receive and attach a copy of the Certificate of Tax Credit issued by the AEDC or the Commission.10 This certificate validates the credit amount earned based on the project’s approved status and the reported QREs.

Corporations claiming the income tax credit must use the Arkansas Business Incentive Credit form, AR1100BIC, and attach it to their AR1100CT Corporation Income Tax Return.13 When filing this form, the Strategic R&D credit is identified by the specific Credit Type Code 0025, designated as the In-House Research Area of Strategic Value Income Tax Credit.13

All claims are subject to the general rules established under Ark. Code Ann. § 26-51-1103, which governs the total amount of credits that can be claimed against liability and the carryforward rules.1 Effective compliance requires seamless internal coordination between R&D teams (drafting the technical project plan), finance teams (tracking QREs), and the corporate tax department (handling the DFA filing).

Section V: Combination and Anti-Stacking Rules

Arkansas has clear rules regarding the ability to combine R&D credits. These rules are designed to prevent excessive state subsidy for a single expenditure while actively encouraging collaboration between the private sector and higher education.

V.A. Prohibition on Combining In-House Incentives

A critical rule governing the Strategic R&D credit is the general prohibition on combining it with other in-house research incentives for the same expenditures.2

The primary alternative is the In-House R&D Tax Credit Program (20%), which is designed for “mature companies performing on-going In-House research”.2 This credit is calculated on the incremental amount of QREs that exceed a baseline established in the preceding year.1 Because the Strategic R&D credit (33%) is a non-incremental, flat-rate incentive intended for emerging firms, taxpayers must conduct a detailed financial analysis to choose the single most beneficial incentive track for their in-house expenditures, as they cannot stack the 33% credit with the 20% credit.2

V.B. Permissible Combination: University-Based Research

In contrast to the anti-stacking rule for in-house incentives, the Strategic R&D credit may be combined with incentives for research conducted with Arkansas colleges or universities.2

The state offers a parallel University-Based Research and Development tax credit, which also provides an income tax credit equal to 33% of qualified research expenditures.3 This incentive is available to an eligible business that contracts with one or more Arkansas colleges or universities to perform research.3

The decision to allow stacking of the Strategic R&D credit with the University Research credit is a strong indicator of state intent: Arkansas actively seeks to subsidize the creation of a sophisticated research ecosystem where emerging technology firms (using the 33% capped credit) also engage directly with academic institutions. This policy is structured to drive technology transfer and ensure that state-funded research benefits are leveraged across both the private sector and higher education, maximizing the state’s return on investment in R&D infrastructure.

The following table summarizes the key financial and structural parameters of the Strategic R&D credit.

Key Parameters of the Arkansas Strategic R&D Tax Credit (33%)

Section VI: Case Study and Strategic Application

The following case study illustrates the application of the Strategic R&D tax credit limitations and utilization provisions for an emerging technology firm in Arkansas.

VI.A. Example: ArkLithium Battery Component Innovation

ArkLithium Inc. is an emerging firm based in Arkansas that specializes in developing new, solid-state battery components. This research activity falls squarely within the ASTA-identified strategic area of Lithium and Advanced Energy.5 ArkLithium has successfully applied for and received discretionary approval from the AEDC for the Strategic R&D Tax Credit, signing a financial incentive agreement for the five-year term. In its initial year of operation, the company projects significant losses.

Year 1 Financials (Pre-Profit Phase):

Credit Calculation and Carryforward (Year 1):

1. Gross Credit Calculation: The $160,000 in QREs multiplied by the 33% credit rate yields a calculated credit of $52,800.
2. Maximum Cap Application: Due to the rigid statutory maximum, the credit claimable is limited to $50,000.1 (Note: $151,515 in QREs would have maximized the credit, making the additional $8,485 in QREs inefficient for this specific incentive).
3. Credit Utilization: Because the company incurred a loss, the income tax liability is $0. The credit cannot be used in Year 1.
4. Carryforward: The full earned credit of $50,000 is carried forward for up to 9 years.3

Year 4 Financials (First Profitable Year):

By Year 4, ArkLithium Inc. has successfully commercialized its technology and earned significant taxable income.

• Arkansas Income Tax Liability (Before Credits): $45,000
• Strategic R&D Credit Earned in Year 4 (Assumed Max): $50,000
• Accumulated Credit Carryforward (from Year 1, 2, 3): $150,000

Credit Utilization in Profit Year:

1. Liability Offset: The existing carryforward of $150,000 is applied to the $45,000 tax liability. The credit offsets 100% of the liability.1
2. Tax Paid: $45,000 Liability – $45,000 Used Carryforward = $0 Tax Paid.
3. Remaining Credit: The remaining $105,000 from the initial carryforward, plus the $50,000 credit earned in Year 4, results in a total of $155,000 in credit carryforward for future years.

VI.B. Strategic Decision Making and Maximizing Utility

The analysis of ArkLithium demonstrates the importance of efficiency and stacking within the Arkansas incentive landscape.

QRE Optimization: The strict $50,000 cap dictates the optimization strategy. The highest marginal tax benefit is achieved by concentrating expenses on qualified wages until the $151,515 QRE threshold is met. Spending beyond this level on qualified wages provides no additional state tax benefit under this specific incentive, although such spending may be necessary for project scope completion.

Coordination with University Research: If ArkLithium strategically engages in collaborative research, contracting $100,000 of R&D to an Arkansas university, they qualify for the separate University-Based R&D credit, calculated at 33% of the expenditure. This equates to an additional $33,000 credit, which is permissible to stack with the Strategic R&D credit.2 This stacking allowance permits the company to earn up to $83,000 in R&D credits annually, significantly lowering the net cost of their research investment and reinforcing the state’s collaborative economic development goals.

Conclusion and Recommendations

The Arkansas Strategic Research and Development Tax Credit is a precisely calibrated state tool offering a high rate of subsidy (33%) to incentivize research in fields deemed critical for Arkansas’s long-term economic prosperity, such as Advanced Energy and Advanced Agriculture.5 Its structure, characterized by a low annual maximum cap of $50,000 and a five-year term, is designed to propel emerging technology firms through their early-stage, high-risk R&D phases.1

The program’s value for startups is further secured by the 100% liability offset and the long 9-year carryforward provision, which preserves the credit’s monetary value for use against future tax liabilities.3

However, claiming this incentive successfully requires heightened attention to statutory compliance and administrative procedure. The discretionary nature of the award means success hinges on the quality of the project plan submitted to the AEDC and strict adherence to the narrowly defined QRE rules.

Actionable Recommendations for Taxpayers:

1. Prioritize Strategic Alignment: Before applying, verify that the proposed research aligns precisely with the most current strategic plan published by the Arkansas Science and Technology Authority (ASTA). The project plan submitted to the AEDC must articulate the direct long-term economic value to the state to secure the discretionary approval.3
2. Optimize QRE Tracking and Documentation: Recognize the critical distinction between federal and state QREs. The Arkansas credit is focused almost exclusively on qualified R&D employee wages; costs for supplies, equipment, and general administration are excluded.2 Firms should implement detailed time-tracking systems to document that the claimed wages are restricted to the actual conduct, direct supervision, or direct support of qualified research.
3. Ensure Administrative Adherence: Initiate the application process by submitting the detailed project plan to the AEDC 45 days prior to the tax year end.2 Once approval is granted and the certificate is issued, ensure the claim is formally submitted to the DFA using Form AR1100BIC, citing the specific Code 0025, to finalize the compliance process.10

Maximize Stacking Opportunities: If project scope permits, strategically contract research with Arkansas colleges or universities. The expenses incurred in university contracts qualify for a separate, stackable 33% tax credit, allowing businesses to maximize their total R&D tax benefit beyond the $50,000 in-house cap.2

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/