Strategic Compliance Report: Defining “Technological in Nature” for the Arkansas R&D Tax Credit

The concept of “Technological in Nature” (TIN) is the scientific cornerstone of the Arkansas Research and Development (R&D) income tax credit. This criterion mandates that the process of experimentation used to discover information must fundamentally rely upon principles of hard science, such as physical sciences, engineering, or computer science.1 Meeting this threshold is essential for qualified research expenses to be eligible for state tax relief, forming the basis for regulatory approval by the Arkansas Department of Economic Development (AEDC) or the Arkansas Science and Technology Authority (ASTA).

I. Executive Summary: Defining the Core Test

The “Technological in Nature” test requires the discovery process to rely fundamentally on principles derived from physical sciences, biological sciences, chemistry, engineering, or computer science.1 Activities must seek to resolve technical uncertainty regarding the function, performance, reliability, or quality of a new or improved business component.4

This requirement functions as the foundational scientific pillar of qualified research under Arkansas law, directly mirroring standards established in the Federal Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41.5 By demanding explicit reliance on “hard sciences,” Arkansas aims to direct tax incentives toward innovation that represents a true advancement in technical understanding, rather than routine iteration, operational optimization, or market adaptation.1 Satisfying the TIN criterion is non-negotiable and necessitates detailed documentation of the underlying scientific methodology utilized throughout the entire experimentation process.2 The ability to prove that research is technological in nature directly impacts a business’s compliance success and determines the availability of the state credit.

II. Legislative Framework: Arkansas R&D Incentives and Federal Alignment

Arkansas provides comprehensive R&D incentives intended to foster university-based research, in-house corporate R&D, and development within technology-based enterprises.7 These programs are critical for businesses seeking to minimize state income tax liability by offsetting qualified research expenditures (QREs) incurred within the state.

A. Statutory Authority and Program Structure (ACA §15-4-2708)

The Arkansas R&D credit is authorized under the Consolidated Incentive Act, specifically ACA §15-4-2708, and operates through several targeted programs: In-House R&D, University-Based Research, and Targeted/Strategic Value Business Research.7

The credit is not universally available but is often discretionary, particularly for In-House and Targeted Business credits, requiring approval from the AEDC Executive Director.6 The financial incentive agreement period under this section is typically five years, beginning on the first day of the business’s tax year in which the agreement is signed.7

Financial Details and Limitations

The value and limits of the credits vary based on the specific program utilized:

• In-House Research: Businesses performing ongoing in-house research can receive a 20% credit on QREs that exceed the baseline expenditure established in the preceding year, for a period of five years.6 For new facilities, the base year is set at zero for the first three years.8
• Targeted/Strategic Value Research: Targeted businesses may be offered income tax credits equal to 33% of the qualified research and development expenditures incurred each year for up to five years.6 This Strategic Value credit is specifically capped at a maximum of $50,000 per taxpayer per tax year.8
• University-Based Research: Eligible businesses contracting with Arkansas colleges or universities for research may also qualify for a 33% income tax credit for QREs.10

Regardless of the program, the tax credits may be utilized to offset up to 100% of a company’s annual income tax liability, and any unused credits may be carried forward for nine years.6

B. The Federal Foundation: Adoption of the IRC §41 Four-Part Test

Arkansas’s definition of qualified research is based on the federal R&D tax credit (IRC §41), utilizing the same four criteria.3 These four tests must be satisfied simultaneously for an activity to qualify:

1. Qualified Purpose: The expenses must be for creating a new product or improving an existing one.3 The application of the technological information must be intended to be useful in a new or improved business component.6
2. Elimination of Uncertainty: The activity must be intended to discover information that eliminates technical uncertainty concerning the development or improvement of a product.8
3. Process of Experimentation: The taxpayer must undergo a systematic process designed to evaluate one or more alternatives to achieve a result where the capability, method, or design is uncertain at the outset.2
4. Technological in Nature (TIN): The research must fundamentally rely on principles of hard science, such as physical or biological sciences, chemistry, engineering, or computer science.3

C. The Pre-Approval Layer: A Crucial Compliance Distinction

A crucial structural difference exists between claiming the R&D credit in Arkansas versus the federal program: the requirement for state pre-approval. While the definition of TIN is borrowed directly from IRC §41 5, Arkansas enforces compliance through the mandatory application and project plan submission to the AEDC or ASTA.2

Federal qualification often relies on post-hoc justification during an audit to prove the activity met the four tests. Conversely, Arkansas qualification requires proactive, pre-hoc validation of the plan’s scientific merit. Businesses must submit an application that clearly identifies the intent of the project, planned expenditures, and start/end dates.6 This process ensures the state can vet whether the proposed research is genuinely technological in nature before the credit is officially granted. Consequently, the documentation must explicitly prove the technical nature of the intent, not just the eventual outcome.

III. The “Technological in Nature” Requirement (TIN): Deep Analysis

The TIN test is the gatekeeper of R&D eligibility, focusing on the fundamental scientific basis of the activities. If the underlying discovery process does not rely on a hard science, the activity cannot qualify, regardless of how complex or innovative it may seem in a commercial context.

A. The Statutory Definition: Reliance on Hard Science

Arkansas law is specific about the scope of the TIN test. The experimentation process must “fundamentally rely on principles of hard science”.1 This requirement limits qualified activities to those rooted in established scientific or engineering disciplines.3

The five explicitly recognized disciplines that satisfy the TIN requirement are:

1. Physical sciences
2. Biological sciences
3. Chemistry
4. Engineering
5. Computer science.1

This specificity establishes the scientific domain in which the technical uncertainty must be resolved. Any research activity that falls outside these domains—such as market research, finance, or social sciences—is explicitly precluded from qualifying for the credit.13

B. Distinguishing Fundamental Reliance from Routine Practice

A key interpretative challenge lies in defining “fundamental reliance.” If the research outcome could be reasonably determined through routine methods, standard codes, or existing industry knowledge, it fails the TIN test, even if the work requires a degree of technical expertise.

The test focuses on the discovery of information that advances scientific or technical knowledge relevant to the taxpayer’s business component. It is the application of the principles of hard science to resolve technological uncertainty that is critical. For example, simply customizing existing software or adapting an existing product to a particular customer’s need—activities explicitly excluded from qualified research—do not constitute a fundamental reliance on hard science for discovery.13

C. The Interplay of TIN and the Permitted Purpose Test

The TIN test and the Permitted Purpose test are inextricably linked. The information discovered, which must be technological in nature, must also be intended to be useful in the development of a new or improved business component.7 A business component is typically defined by its new or improved function, performance, reliability, or quality.4

If the research is technological in nature (e.g., investigating material fatigue properties), its purpose must also be technological (e.g., improving mechanical performance or structural reliability). If a company undertakes a study that involves complex data analytics but ultimately serves a purely commercial purpose (e.g., optimizing supply chain logistics without novel computer science breakthroughs), the activity may fail the Permitted Purpose test because the underlying information sought is not strictly technological, or it may fail the TIN test by relying on operational science rather than hard science.

Failure to meet the TIN requirement almost automatically invalidates the Permitted Purpose test, as the purpose relies on non-technological information. For example, if a manufacturer tests various packaging materials to see which is aesthetically preferred by consumers (non-TIN, related to marketing/humanities), the purpose (improving customer satisfaction/marketability) is non-qualifying, even though the packaging is part of an improved “business component.” The nexus must be a technological improvement driven by scientific discovery.

Table 1: Qualifying Hard Science Disciplines for Arkansas R&D

D. The TIN and Process of Experimentation Nexus

The Process of Experimentation is the third major requirement, demanding that the company undergo a systematic process designed to evaluate alternatives where uncertainty exists.2 TIN provides the crucial context: the process must be one of scientific or engineering inquiry, not merely a haphazard or administrative process.3

Modeling, simulation, and systematic trial and error are accepted forms of experimentation.8 However, these methods must be based on the principles of the hard sciences listed in the TIN definition. A company must demonstrate that the experimental steps—from hypothesis generation through testing and evaluation—rely on rigorous application of engineering principles, chemical analysis, or computer science theory to resolve the technical uncertainty. If the systematic trial-and-error process is not rooted in these hard sciences, the experimentation process itself may be deemed non-qualified.

IV. Regulatory Guidance and State Agency Compliance Procedures

Compliance for the Arkansas R&D credit is heavily governed by the administrative requirements of the Arkansas Economic Development Commission (AEDC) and the Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration (DFA).

A. The Mandate for Proactive Pre-Approval

Arkansas law dictates that the taxpayer must apply to the AEDC or ASTA in order to qualify for the income tax credit, requiring approval through a financial incentive agreement before the credit can be claimed.2 This upfront approval mechanism places a higher burden of proof on the applicant regarding the scientific merit of the project.

The application must include a detailed project plan that clearly identifies the intent of the project, projected expenditures, and the start and end dates.6 This document serves as the primary evidence to the AEDC that the work meets the TIN test. The required demonstration must articulate how the proposed research activity necessitates the fundamental reliance on the principles of hard science to resolve a technical uncertainty. Since the credit is discretionary for certain programs, the AEDC Executive Director uses this project plan to validate the technological nature and strategic value of the research.6

B. DFA Guidance on Records and Proof of Scientific Reliance

The Department of Finance and Administration (DFA) oversees the claiming of the credit after the AEDC/ASTA has approved the project. To claim the credit, the taxpayer must attach a copy of the Certificate of Tax Credit issued by the AEDC or ASTA to the tax return.9

DFA auditing requires evidence that supports the claim that the work was conducted systematically and that records were kept documenting the experimental activities and business records.2 To substantiate the TIN claim, documentation must demonstrate the link between the expenditures and the specific scientific activities undertaken.

Qualified Research Expenditures (QREs) primarily focus on in-house expenses for taxable wages paid to a full-time permanent employee or contractual employee for performing qualified services, supervising, or directly supporting qualified research.7 Since the TIN test requires reliance on hard science, meticulous time-tracking is necessary to validate that qualified personnel—engineers, scientists, or computer programmers—were performing the work. If a company claims R&D wages for employees whose time logs or job titles suggest primarily administrative, marketing, or routine operational tasks, the DFA may challenge the TIN assertion, arguing that non-scientific personnel cannot fundamentally rely on hard science principles for the discovery of information. The burden rests on the taxpayer to prove that the QREs were incurred specifically for the purpose of scientific inquiry as outlined in the approved project plan.

C. Explicit Exclusions and Activities Failing the TIN Test

Arkansas law explicitly excludes specific activities from the definition of qualified research.13 These exclusions typically fail the TIN test because they lack scientific discovery or fall outside the domain of the hard sciences.

Activities that are specifically excluded include:

• Any research conducted after the beginning of commercial production.12
• Research adapting an existing product or process to a particular customer’s need.13
• Duplication of an existing product or process.13
• Surveys or studies (often market or administrative).13
• Research in the social sciences, arts, or humanities.13
• Construction or renovation of buildings, or purchase of production machinery and equipment.13

These exclusions highlight the state’s focus on encouraging fundamental technological advancement rather than routine business or operational maintenance. For instance, excluding research in the social sciences directly reinforces the requirement for reliance on physical, biological, chemical, engineering, or computer science principles for the TIN test.13

Table 2: Activities Explicitly Excluded from Qualified Research in Arkansas

V. Practical Application and Case Study Illustration

To successfully navigate the Arkansas R&D credit landscape, particularly concerning the TIN requirement, businesses must demonstrate a clear and defensible link between their expenditures and the application of hard science.

A. Identifying High-TIN Research for Strategic Value Credits

Arkansas offers an enhanced 33% credit for research designated as being in an “Area of Strategic Value”.8 This definition encompasses research in fields having long-term economic or commercial value to the state.8 Projects that inherently demonstrate a high degree of complexity and fundamental reliance on the hard sciences are prime candidates for this designation and the associated higher credit rate, capped at $50,000 annually.8

Because of the mandatory pre-approval process, the Arkansas R&D tax credit effectively holds a higher bar for the TIN test than the federal standard. Projects that are ambiguous or borderline under federal guidelines—such as general process improvements in manufacturing that lack a clear chemical or physical science foundation—are less likely to survive the mandatory, proactive scrutiny of the AEDC Executive Director. The state’s focus is clearly on subsidizing hard, verifiable scientific advancement, particularly through its Strategic Value program.4

B. Illustrative Example: Advanced Materials Development (A Qualifying Scenario)

Consider the case of Stellar Composites, an Arkansas-based defense contractor specializing in advanced aerospace materials, which has been approved for research in an area of Strategic Value.4

The Project: Stellar Composites undertakes research to develop a novel lightweight, high-temperature carbon composite material (Component X) intended to replace conventional metal alloys in critical aircraft engine parts. The project’s goal is to improve performance and reliability by significantly reducing weight while maintaining or exceeding structural integrity at temperatures that exceed the current material limits.

TIN Test Satisfaction:

1. Hard Science Reliance: The project’s uncertainty is fundamentally rooted in Chemistry (developing a proprietary, heat-resistant resin matrix and optimizing the fiber surface treatment) and Engineering (systematically predicting and testing structural failure modes using complex material science and mechanical models).1
2. Uncertainty: Technical uncertainty exists regarding the precise chemical reactions of the new resin matrix under extreme pressure and heat, and whether the resulting composite structure can achieve the specified performance metrics without unexpected degradation or brittle failure.
3. Process of Experimentation: Stellar Composites adopts a systematic process. This involves iteratively varying the chemical composition and curing schedules of the resin, followed by developing and running finite element analysis (FEA) models, and culminating in physical testing (stress testing, fatigue testing, and thermal cycling) to evaluate each alternative design until the optimal material composition and structural integration are achieved.2
4. Permitted Purpose: The application of this technological information is intended to improve the function and performance of a new engine component, aligning perfectly with the Permitted Purpose test.4

Regulatory Compliance Outcome: Stellar Composites submits a detailed project plan to the AEDC, explicitly citing the specific chemical and engineering principles required to resolve the technical uncertainty. Upon approval as “Research in an Area of Strategic Value,” the company qualifies for the enhanced 33% credit on QREs (up to the $50,000 cap), demonstrating successful alignment of scientific activity with state regulatory requirements.4

C. Non-Qualifying Example: Routine Software Integration (Failure to Meet TIN)

A banking software firm based in Arkansas decides to upgrade its mobile application by integrating a third-party, commercially available API to streamline the customer login process and reduce loading times.

Failure Analysis: While this activity involves personnel skilled in computer science and the work is focused on an improved business component (the app), the core effort is implementation, integration, configuration, and testing of known, existing technologies. There is no attempt to discover new information related to fundamental computer science principles, such as developing a novel encryption algorithm, pioneering a new data structure theory, or advancing machine learning capabilities. The uncertainty being eliminated is primarily operational (will the integration be smooth?) or commercial (will users adopt the new process?), not technological in nature as defined by the application of hard science principles.13 Therefore, the activity fails the TIN test because it does not rely fundamentally on the principles of computer science for discovery.

Table 3: Arkansas R&D Tax Credit Program Comparison (Selected Metrics)

VI. Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations for Arkansas Taxpayers

The “Technological in Nature” criterion is the definitive measure of scientific validity for the Arkansas R&D tax credit. Compliance success requires more than simply conducting research; it demands the explicit, demonstrable application of hard science principles—physical science, biological science, chemistry, engineering, or computer science—to resolve genuine technical uncertainty related to a business component’s function, performance, reliability, or quality.

The most critical strategic consideration for Arkansas taxpayers is the mandatory pre-approval process by the AEDC or ASTA. This upfront vetting of the project plan means that businesses must treat the TIN test not merely as a potential legal defense during an audit, but as the central scientific justification for their tax incentive application. Any ambiguity regarding the reliance on hard science must be resolved during the application phase.

To maximize compliance and credit value, businesses must proactively document the scientific rationale (TIN) alongside the systematic process (Process of Experimentation). This includes maintaining meticulous records of wages paid to personnel qualified in hard sciences (engineers, chemists, programmers) who are directly involved in the experimentation. Furthermore, companies engaging in demonstrably high-TIN activities should strategically pursue the “Strategic Value” credit to maximize the 33% rate, ensuring their research plan explicitly aligns with the state’s long-term economic goals as assessed by the AEDC.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/