The Arkansas University-Based Research & Development Tax Credit: An Expert Analysis of Incentives and Compliance

1. Executive Summary: Defining University-Based Research for Tax Strategy

University-Based Research for the Arkansas R&D Tax Credit refers to contractual agreements where an eligible business pays an Arkansas college or university to perform qualified research expenditures (QREs). This collaboration yields a significant 33% state income tax credit on the contracted QRE amount, intended to foster public-private innovation partnerships within the state.1

This incentive, codified under Arkansas Code Annotated (ACA) § 26-51-1102(b), establishes a crucial mechanism for private sector entities to leverage the state’s academic infrastructure. Unlike the incremental approach of the standard in-house R&D credit, the university credit is defined primarily by the nature of the transaction—a payment to a qualified educational institution—and provides a generous flat rate on the approved expenditure.2 This structure provides a stable and predictable incentive, making it highly attractive for corporations entering into new research agreements. To successfully claim the 33% credit, the corporate taxpayer must ensure that the underlying research activity meets strict statutory definitions for qualified research and, critically, must secure mandatory, written administrative approval from both the Arkansas Economic Development Commission (AEDC) and the Department of Higher Education (ADHE).

2. The Arkansas R&D Incentive Landscape: Strategic Value of Academic Partnerships

Arkansas has established a comprehensive R&D incentive framework designed to stimulate innovation across various business maturity stages, including established mature firms, younger targeted technology enterprises, and strategic university collaborations.1 These incentives generally allow tax credits to be carried forward for nine years and may offset up to 100% of a business’s state income tax liability in a given year.1

2.1 Arkansas’s Strategic Rationale for R&D Tax Credits

The state’s policy explicitly encourages the monetization of knowledge generated within its public institutions. By offering a high tax credit rate for external research, the state encourages businesses to direct innovation funding directly into Arkansas’s higher education system, supporting faculty, staff, and graduate student research efforts.1 This policy bias toward public-private cooperation minimizes the cost of external collaboration for businesses while maximizing the overall state benefit derived from shared intellectual resources.

2.2 Comparative Advantage: University-Based R&D (The 33% Flat Rate)

The University-Based R&D Tax Credit offers distinct financial advantages compared to other state incentives, particularly the standard In-House R&D credit.

The credit rate for university collaboration is fixed at 33% of qualified research expenditures.1 This is markedly higher and simpler than the 20% In-House R&D credit provided to mature firms, which is calculated only on the incremental amount spent exceeding the baseline expenditure established in the preceding year.1 The flat, non-incremental calculation for university research simplifies tax planning immensely, as the taxpayer is not burdened with calculating a complex historical baseline expenditure, thus guaranteeing a credit on the full contracted, qualified amount.

Furthermore, state guidance indicates that businesses utilizing the University-Based research incentive generally possess the ability to combine this incentive with other in-house research incentives.3 This allows for a robust dual-track R&D strategy, where a company may claim the incremental 20% credit for its core internal R&D staff while simultaneously claiming the 33% flat credit for specialized external research conducted by an Arkansas university.

Table 1 provides a comparative overview of the key R&D tax credit incentives available in Arkansas:

Table 1: Comparative Overview of Key Arkansas R&D Tax Credit Incentives

3. Statutory Foundation and Defining Qualified Research Expenditures (QREs)

The legal foundation for the University-Based R&D credit is established under ACA § 26-51-1102(b), granting a credit against either Arkansas corporate or individual income tax equal to 33% of the qualified research expenditures incurred in qualified research programs.4

3.1 Statutory Authorization and Eligible Parties

An eligible business is defined as any taxpayer that contracts with one or more Arkansas colleges or universities in performing basic or applied research.1 The definition of a “Qualified Educational Institution” is broad, encompassing public universities, colleges, junior colleges, vocational technical training schools supported by the State of Arkansas, as well as qualified private institutions located within the state.9

3.2 The Strict Definition of Contractual QREs

A crucial element of compliance in Arkansas is the restrictive definition of Qualified Research Expenditures (QREs) applicable to this incentive, which is significantly narrower than the federal IRC § 41 definition. For contractual agreements with educational institutions, QREs are explicitly limited to wages paid and usual fringe benefits specific to the research activities of the employees of the business or for wages and usual fringe benefits paid through contractual agreements.10

This focus on wages and fringe benefits reveals a strict policy mandate to direct the tax subsidy toward supporting the personnel conducting the research at the academic institution. Expenses commonly associated with federal R&D credits—such as costs for supplies, equipment, land, and building construction or renovation—do not qualify for the 20% in-house credit 3 and are therefore excluded from the contractual QRE base for the 33% credit.

Consequently, if a company enters into a $500,000 contract with a university, but the contractual budget allocates only $250,000 specifically to the salaries and benefits of the academic researchers, the credit base will be restricted to that $250,000. For maximized credit benefit, businesses must structure their contractual agreements to ensure maximum allocation of funds toward reimbursing the university for researcher and employee compensation, with line-item transparency to demonstrate that the funds cover qualified personnel costs. Furthermore, these contractual agreements must be formally approved in writing by the AEDC/ASTA Director to confirm the expense structure and project viability.10

3.3 Satisfying the Three Statutory Tests for Qualified Research

Beyond the expenditure definition, the research activity itself must meet three specific, federally modeled tests to be considered “qualified research” in Arkansas. These activities must satisfy all of the following criteria 1:

1. Technological Nature: The activity must be undertaken for the purpose of discovering information which is technological in nature.
2. New or Improved Business Component: The application of the technological information must be intended to be useful in a new or improved business component.
3. Process of Experimentation: Substantially all the activities related to the research effort must constitute elements of a process of experimentation relating to a new or improved function, performance, reliability, or quality.1

4. Administrative Compliance: Navigating State Revenue Office Guidance and Approval

Claiming the University-Based R&D Tax Credit is not automatic upon execution of a contract; it requires navigating a coordinated, multi-agency oversight process involving the Arkansas Economic Development Commission (AEDC), the Division of Higher Education (ADHE), and the Department of Finance and Administration (DFA) through its division, the Arkansas Science and Technology Authority (ASTA).

4.1 The Dual-Agency Approval Requirement

The most significant administrative hurdle is the mandate for dual approval, as stipulated in ACA § 26-51-1104(b). The taxpayer must demonstrate that the Director of the Arkansas Economic Development Commission (AEDC) (or ASTA, depending on the division administering the program) AND the Commissioner of the Division of Higher Education (ADHE) have formally approved the qualified research expenditure as a necessary component of a qualified research program.6

This stringent requirement ensures accountability across two state objectives: the AEDC/ASTA verifies the economic impact and strategic alignment of the research project, while the ADHE confirms the academic rigor and proper integration of the research into the mission and capabilities of the collaborating educational institution.12

4.2 Application Process and Documentation

The approval process is formalized through a Financial Incentive Agreement (FIA) with the commission, which typically spans a maximum term of five years.3

The applicant must submit a comprehensive application that includes a detailed project plan. This plan must clearly delineate the intent of the project, the planned expenditures, the specific start and end dates of the research, and an estimate of the total project costs.1 To ensure timely review and approval before tax filing, applications should be submitted approximately 45 days prior to the company’s tax year end date.2

4.3 DFA/Revenue Office Guidance for Claiming the Credit

The final authority for utilizing the credit against state taxes rests with the Department of Finance and Administration (DFA), the state revenue office.

• Required Documentation: To claim the credit granted under ACA § 26-51-1102, the taxpayer must attach a copy of the official Certificate of Tax Credit issued by the Arkansas Science and Technology Authority (ASTA) to their annual state income tax return.6 This documentation is generally submitted with the relevant tax schedule (e.g., Form AR1000TC, Schedule of Tax Credits).13
• Agency Contact: DFA guidance directs businesses seeking information regarding the application process for the Research & Development with Universities Tax Credit Program to contact the Arkansas Science and Technology Authority (ASTA).6

The administrative framework mandates that corporate tax directors treat the application process as a critical pre-expenditure step, ensuring the contract aligns with the stringent QRE definition and securing the necessary written certification from both the economic development and higher education authorities.

Table 2: Statutory and Administrative Requirements for University-Based QREs

5. Credit Utilization, Limitations, and Carryforward

The potential for conflict between promotional guidance and statutory caps requires careful consideration when planning for credit utilization. The utilization rules define the ultimate financial value of the 33% credit.

5.1 Maximum Annual Offset: Reconciling the 100% Rule

The primary policy goal of the R&D incentives is to allow maximum offset. The AEDC consistently communicates that R&D tax credits, including those for university collaborations, may be used to offset up to 100% of a business’s annual income tax liability.1

However, the statutory section governing this credit (ACA § 26-51-1102) is technically subject to the general R&D limitations established in ACA § 26-51-1103. Historically, rules governing this subchapter have stated that the total credit for qualified expenditures and donations shall be limited to fifty percent (50%) of the taxpayer’s net tax liability, calculated after all other credits have been applied.9

The resolution of this apparent discrepancy lies in the compliance pathway chosen. Businesses that operate under the discretionary, formal Financial Incentive Agreement (FIA) structure authorized under ACA § 15-4-2708 (which governs the 33% research rate programs) are typically assured of the superior 100% offset utilization. This FIA framework provides clarity and certainty, ensuring that the DFA honors the maximum offset benefit promoted by the economic development agencies. Tax planners must, therefore, seek the FIA to guarantee the enhanced utilization benefit rather than relying solely on the general statutory credit grant, which might expose the taxpayer to the more restrictive 50% cap.

It is important to note that unlike the Research in an Area of Strategic Value program, which is also a 33% credit but capped at $50,000 per tax year 1, the University-Based R&D credit, when earned outside of the strategic value designation, does not appear to carry an explicit annual dollar cap, allowing companies to invest significantly larger amounts in academic partnerships.

5.2 Carryforward Provisions

A major advantage of the Arkansas R&D incentive programs is the duration of the tax relief. The credits are nonrefundable, meaning they cannot generate a cash refund, but any unused credits resulting from the 100% or 50% annual limitation may be carried forward for a generous period of nine (9) years beyond the tax year in which the credit was initially earned.1 This long carryforward provides essential stability for companies whose state tax liability may fluctuate significantly year to year.

5.3 Transferability

While the standard in-house credits are generally not transferable, the credits earned by “Targeted Businesses” under their specific 33% incentive programs may be sold.2 Given that the University-Based credit shares the 33% rate structure and often operates under similar financial incentive agreements, if the eligible business meets the criteria for a targeted business, the credits may be sold once within one year of issuance, providing an avenue for realizing immediate capital benefit even if the company has minimal current tax liability.6

6. Actionable Case Study: Calculating the 33% University-Based Credit

The following example demonstrates the high return on investment provided by the flat 33% rate when all administrative requirements are successfully met.

6.1 Example Scenario: Medical Device Firm Collaboration

ArkMedical Innovations, an Arkansas-based company specializing in medical devices, decides to contract with an Arkansas State University engineering department for a project focused on developing advanced surface materials for implants. This project qualifies under the three statutory tests for qualified research.

ArkMedical successfully applies to the AEDC/ASTA and ADHE, securing a five-year Financial Incentive Agreement (FIA) for the university research program.

• The Research Contract: The contract mandates a total payment of $\$500,000$ to the university for the tax year 2024.
• QRE Allocation: After review and written approval by the AEDC Director, the contract confirms that the portion of the payment designated for faculty salaries, research stipends, and associated fringe benefits (i.e., the Qualified Research Expenditures) is $\$450,000$.10 The remaining $\$50,000$ covers equipment fees and administration.
• ArkMedical’s Tax Profile (Tax Year 2024):

• Arkansas Taxable Income: $\$2,000,000$
• Arkansas State Income Tax Liability (Estimated 6.9% rate): $\$138,000$

6.2 Step-by-Step Calculation and Tax Benefit

The calculation focuses solely on the approved QREs, not the total contract value.

In this scenario, ArkMedical realizes a $\$138,000$ tax savings in the current year, achieving a zero state tax liability for 2024. The remaining $\$10,500$ in unused credit is carried forward for up to nine subsequent years, ensuring that the state incentive provides a comprehensive return on the research investment. This outcome underscores that the 33% credit provides a direct reduction in tax, yielding a substantial and immediate financial benefit.15

7. Conclusion: Strategic Integration of Academic Research into Corporate Tax Planning

The Arkansas University-Based R&D Tax Credit is a robust, high-value incentive designed to anchor technological innovation within the state’s academic institutions. The program’s core strength lies in its predictable 33% flat rate on contracted QREs, offering a clear advantage over the complexity and limitations inherent in the incremental calculations required for in-house research.

For corporate taxpayers, the effective utilization of this program hinges entirely on rigorous administrative compliance and strategic contractual structuring. To capture the full benefit—specifically, the 33% rate, the potential 100% liability offset, and the nine-year carryforward—businesses must:

1. Strictly Define QREs: Ensure the contractual agreement with the university explicitly allocates the maximum feasible amount of funds to researcher wages and fringe benefits, as only these costs qualify for the credit base.10
2. Secure Dual Administrative Approval: Proactively obtain the mandatory written approvals from both the Director of the AEDC/ASTA and the Commissioner of the ADHE, confirming that the research project is sanctioned under the “qualified research program” criteria.6
3. Formalize the Financial Incentive Agreement (FIA): Relying on the formal FIA process, rather than the general statutory credit grant, is the crucial step to confirm the 100% tax liability offset and the nine-year carryforward period, maximizing the economic impact of the incentive.1

By navigating these specific legal and administrative pathways, businesses can successfully integrate academic research partnerships into their corporate tax planning, transforming research collaboration into a direct and significant reduction in their Arkansas state income tax liability.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/