The Definitive Guide to California Qualified Research: Compliance, Calculation, and the FTB Framework

Executive Summary: Defining California Qualified Research

California Qualified Research (CQR) is defined as research and development activities that satisfy the stringent Federal Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41 requirements, but are strictly limited to expenditures incurred for activities physically performed within the boundaries of the State of California.1

The California Research Credit, codified under Revenue and Taxation Code (R&TC) Section 23609, functions as a permanent, non-refundable incentive designed to encourage in-state technological investment. The credit is typically calculated as 15% of the qualified research expenses (QREs) that exceed a calculated base amount.3 The most significant strategic advantage of the state credit is the provision allowing unused credit amounts to be carried forward indefinitely, providing long-term value, particularly for pre-profit enterprises.4 However, the calculation involves specific state-level modifications, including a restrictive minimum base amount rule and reduced eligibility for contract research, which necessitates meticulous compliance with Franchise Tax Board (FTB) Form 3523 instructions.6

Section I. Defining California Qualified Research (CQR) in Law: The Dual Requirement

The statutory definition of California Qualified Research imposes a dual compliance burden on taxpayers: adherence to the functional requirements of federal law and strict limitation by state geography. This framework dictates that eligibility rests both on the nature of the activity performed and the location where the costs were incurred.

1.1 Statutory Foundation: Alignment with IRC Section 41

The foundation of CQR is the federal research credit definition found under IRC Section 41. The California Research Credit, authorized by R&TC Section 23609, is closely aligned with the federal rules and mandates that all claimed research activities must meet the rigorous four-part test established by Congress.1 Failure to satisfy any component of this test, regardless of the expense location, invalidates the activity for credit purposes.

The Four-Part Test requires substantiation of the following elements 8:

1. Technological in Nature: The activities must fundamentally rely on the principles of physical or biological science, engineering, or computer science.8 This criterion ensures that the claimed research is technical rather than merely aesthetic or commercial in focus.
2. Permitted Purpose: The research activities must be performed in an attempt to improve the functionality, performance, reliability, or quality of a new or existing “business component,” which can include products, processes, software, or inventions.8
3. Elimination of Uncertainty: A core requirement is that the activities must be intended to discover information that resolves a technical uncertainty regarding the development or improvement of a product or process.9 This establishes the experimental nature of the effort.
4. Process of Experimentation: The research must involve a systematic process of experimentation, which includes, but is not limited to, testing, modeling, simulating, and systematic trial and error.8

The FTB’s conformance to the federal definition for activity qualification means that the standard of documentation required for the state credit is intrinsically governed by federal judicial precedent. Therefore, any taxpayer defending a California claim must be prepared to demonstrate that their technical documentation satisfies the high evidentiary standards required by federal case law concerning technical uncertainty and experimentation. A business that fails to document the technical scope of its projects to the federal level of detail will be exposed to audit adjustments on the basis of activity qualification by the FTB, even if the state’s audit focus is primarily geographical.

1.2 The Critical State Limitation: R&TC § 23609(c)(2)

The most significant point of divergence between the California credit and the federal credit is the geographical restriction. R&TC § 23609(c)(2) unequivocally states that “‘Qualified research’ and ‘basic research’ shall include only research conducted in California”.2

For businesses operating across multiple states, this mandate requires a meticulous allocation of expenses. Unlike the federal credit, which accepts research performed anywhere within the United States, the California credit is limited solely to expenses incurred within the state.4 This means that for multi-state operations, the physical location where the research activity—such as coding, technical testing, or the direct supervision of these activities—occurs is the governing factor for eligibility. This geographical exclusivity is often the primary area of adjustment during FTB audits of companies that fail to implement precise systems for tracking where their research personnel and resources are utilized.

Section II. Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) and California-Specific Deviations

While California generally mirrors the federal guidelines for the types of expenses that qualify for the credit, it imposes crucial modifications regarding the eligibility percentage of contract research and the exclusion of certain capitalized property, requiring distinct calculations on Form FTB 3523.

2.1 Categories of Incurred Expenses

California QREs are the sum of in-house research expenses and contract research expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year while carrying on a trade or business within California.3

• In-House Expenses (100% Eligible): These costs include qualified wages for employees engaged in qualified research, direct supervision of qualified research, or direct support of qualified research activities.3 They also include the costs of qualified supplies and amounts paid to another person for the right to use computers in the conduct of qualified research.3
• Basic Research Payments: For corporations (excluding S corporations, personal holding companies, and certain service organizations), California offers a separate credit stream. Payments made for basic research to qualified nonprofit organizations (such as universities and nonprofit science groups) are eligible for a higher credit rate of 24%.3

2.2 Key State Limitations and Modifications

Contract Research Limitation

California imposes a substantial constraint on contract research expenses (CREs). While federal law allows 75% of payments made to unrelated third parties for qualified research to be treated as QREs, California limits this amount to 65% of the expense.4 This 10% reduction in eligible expenses compared to the federal rule is a clear policy signal that the state prefers to incentivize and reward internal research labor over outsourced R&D. Taxpayers relying heavily on external consultants or labs must weigh the overall cost efficiencies of outsourcing against this mandatory reduction in eligible QREs imposed by state law.

An exception exists for payments made to certain qualified nonprofit research consortia, which are tax-exempt organizations organized primarily to conduct scientific research.6 For these payments, California allows 75% of the cost to be treated as QREs.3 This more favorable percentage is a targeted incentive designed to promote collaborative research between the private sector and non-commercial scientific institutions, such as public universities.

Exclusion of Sales-Tax-Exempt Property

California law modifies the federal definition of QREs to prevent a business from receiving dual tax benefits on the same asset. R&TC Section 23609(c)(1) and Section 23609(c)(2) state that QREs do not include amounts paid or incurred for tangible personal property that is eligible for the sales or use tax exemption provided by R&TC Section 6378.2

This exclusion is particularly relevant to sophisticated industries, such as software development, where expenses related to computers and computer peripheral equipment used primarily to develop or manufacture software may otherwise qualify as QREs.11 Taxpayers claiming QREs for capital expenditures, such as computers used in research, must ensure these assets were not simultaneously claimed for the sales/use tax exemption. FTB auditors often reconcile claimed QREs against a taxpayer’s property tax and sales/use tax records. The requirement for coordination between the R&D claim preparation team and the property tax compliance team is essential to ensure that the exclusion is properly applied and that the company is not claiming a prohibited dual benefit.

Other Limitations

Unlike the federal credit, California does not offer small businesses the option to elect to offset FICA payroll taxes using the credit.4 Furthermore, the state credit is non-refundable, meaning it can only offset the taxpayer’s corporate income tax liability or personal income tax liability, and cannot reduce the minimum franchise tax, annual tax, or alternative minimum tax.3

Section III. FTB Guidance and The Base Amount Calculation (Form FTB 3523)

The base amount calculation, which determines the amount of QREs considered incremental and eligible for the credit, is the most complex aspect of the California credit. The Franchise Tax Board (FTB) requires this calculation to be performed using Form FTB 3523, Research Credit.3

3.1 Claiming the Credit and Credit Rates

Taxpayers claim the credit by filing their income tax return (e.g., Form 100 or 540) and attaching the completed Form FTB 3523.3 The credit is generally equal to the sum of two components 3:

• Regular Credit: 15% of qualified expenses that exceed the calculated base amount.
• Basic Research Credit: 24% of qualified basic research payments that exceed a defined base amount.3

For corporations filing a combined report, the credit earned by members of the group may be assigned to an affiliated corporation that is an eligible member of the same combined group, provided the necessary form (FTB 3544) is filed correctly.3

3.2 Calculating the Base Amount (Regular Credit Method)

The base amount (Line 12 on FTB 3523) is designed to filter out baseline R&D spending, rewarding only the incremental increase in QREs. It is calculated by multiplying the Fixed-Base Percentage (FBP) (Line 10) by the average annual California gross receipts for the four preceding years.6

Fixed-Base Percentage (FBP) Rules

The determination of the Fixed-Base Percentage (FBP) is governed by specific instructions in the FTB 3523 6:

• Existing Companies: For established companies, the FBP is defined as the ratio of aggregate QREs to aggregate gross receipts for at least three taxable years between 1984 and 1988.6 This percentage must be rounded to four decimal places. The FBP is subject to a maximum cap of 16% (.16).6 The mandated reliance on research data from the 1980s presents a substantial compliance challenge for many older companies, as retrieving and substantiating such historical financial records often proves difficult or impossible.
• Start-up Companies: A start-up company is defined as one that first had both gross receipts and QREs after December 31, 1983, and had them for fewer than three taxable years before January 1, 1989.6

• For a start-up’s first five taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 1994, that they have QREs, the FBP is a statutory 3% (.03).6 A 10-year phase-in period allows the company to transition to a credit based on five years of experience.

• Companies with No California Gross Receipts: If a company does not have California gross receipts (as defined by Legal Division Guidance 2012-03-01), the company must calculate its FBP as a start-up company, treating the first taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 1994, in which QREs were incurred as “year one” for the 3% rule.6

3.3 The Mandatory Minimum Base Amount Rule

Regardless of the calculated FBP based on historical experience, the FTB imposes a mandatory minimum base amount rule that fundamentally restricts the credit calculation.6

The base amount (Line 12) cannot be less than 50% of the current year’s total Qualified Research Expenses (Line 9).6

This provision is a critical fiscal control mechanism. It ensures that a company, even a designated “start-up” with a favorable 3% FBP, must demonstrate that its current-year research spending exceeds 50% of its QREs to generate any credit whatsoever. For companies with substantial, but non-incremental, annual R&D spending, this rule effectively caps the maximum incremental expenditure eligible for the 15% credit at 50% of total QREs, resulting in an effective maximum credit rate of 7.5% (15% applied to the 50% incremental amount). For many taxpayers, this 50% restriction proves to be the dominant factor in calculating the base amount, overriding the historical FBP calculation altogether.

The complexities of the fixed-base percentage calculation are summarized below, based on FTB 3523 instructions:

Table 1: California Fixed-Base Percentage Calculation Rules (FTB 3523, Line 10)

Section IV. Legislative Context and Compliance Risk Management

The regulatory landscape for the California Research Credit is subject to ongoing legislative modification, specifically regarding conformity to federal rules and temporary limitations on utilization. Taxpayers must incorporate these changes into their compliance models to mitigate risk.

4.1 The Impact of SB 711 and Federal Conformity (2025)

California law generally conforms to the federal Internal Revenue Code, but often lags behind federal changes. Senate Bill (SB) 711 updates California’s specified date of conformity to the IRC from January 1, 2015, to January 1, 2025.14

A critical change stemming from this conformity update involves the calculation methods available to taxpayers. SB 711 modifies Form FTB 3523 by repealing the Alternative Incremental Credit (AIC) and adjusting the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) percentages.14 Historically, the AIC provided a simpler, three-tiered calculation method for determining the base amount, often preferred by smaller taxpayers.3

The repeal of the AIC for taxable years beginning on or after 2025 forces all taxpayers utilizing that method to transition back to the more complex Regular Credit calculation.6 This increases the administrative burden for these businesses, compelling them to either attempt to source and defend their historical FBP data from the 1984–1988 window, or to comply with the mathematically restrictive 50% minimum base rule.6 This shift demands immediate tax modeling and preparation to ensure that the required historical data, if available, is integrated into the 2025 tax filings.

4.2 Temporary Business Credit Limitation (2024–2026)

For taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2024, and before January 1, 2027, California enacted a temporary measure limiting the application of all business credits, including the R&D credit.3

The total of all business credits, including carryover amounts, may not reduce the taxpayer’s “net tax” or “tax” liability by more than $5,000,000.3 This limitation is applied at the combined reporting group level, requiring complex allocation and sequencing of credit utilization among affiliated entities.3

To mitigate the immediate cash flow impact of this temporary cap, taxpayers may make an irrevocable election using Form FTB 3870. This election allows for the conversion of the disallowed credit amounts into an annual refundable credit.3 If the election is not made, disallowed business credits may be carried over, and the carryover period is extended by the number of taxable years the credit was not allowed.3

4.3 Credit Utilization and Carryforward Advantage

The California Research Credit provides significant long-term strategic value, largely due to its utilization rules.4

• Indefinite Carryforward: If the available credit exceeds the current year’s tax liability, the unused credit may be carried over indefinitely until it is fully exhausted.4 This contrasts favorably with the federal R&D tax credit, which is subject to a 20-year carryforward limit.4 The indefinite nature of the California carryforward increases the net present value of the credit for pre-profit technology companies and other firms facing temporary income shortfalls, as the asset never expires.
• Credit Assignment: Credit earned by C corporations that are members of a combined reporting group may be assigned to other eligible affiliated corporations within the same group.3 This is accomplished by completing and attaching Form FTB 3544, Assignment of Credit.3

The following table summarizes the primary compliance differences between the state and federal programs:

Table 2: Key Differences: Federal vs. California R&D Tax Credit

Section V. Practical Application: A Concrete Example of California Qualified Research

The mechanics of the California credit are best illustrated by demonstrating the application of the 50% minimum base rule, which often overrides the Fixed-Base Percentage calculated using historical receipts.

Case Study: Biotech Firm Process Improvement

Consider BioCatalyst Inc., a technology firm based in Los Angeles that qualifies as a “start-up company” and is in its third year of operations.6 BioCatalyst is engaged in qualified research activities focusing on optimizing its proprietary pharmaceutical manufacturing process, which involves systematic trials and testing to eliminate technical uncertainty regarding product yield and reliability.8

Assumptions for Tax Year 2024:

1. Average Annual California Gross Receipts (Prior 4 years): $10,000,000
2. In-House Wages (CA scientists/engineers): $1,200,000 (100% QRE)
3. Contract Research (CA labs): $200,000 (65% eligible in CA)
4. Current QREs (Line 9) Calculation:

• Wages: $1,200,000
• Contract Research: $200,000 $\times$ 0.65 = $130,000
• Total Current QREs (Line 9): $1,330,000

Calculation of the Base Amount (FTB 3523, Section A):

1. Fixed-Base Percentage (FBP) Determination (Line 10): As a start-up in Year 3, BioCatalyst uses the statutory FBP of 3% (.03).6
2. Base Amount via FBP Method: FBP $\times$ Avg. Gross Receipts:

• $0.03 \times $10,000,000 = $300,000

1. Minimum Base Amount Determination (50% Rule): 50% of Current QREs (Line 9):

• $1,330,000 \times 0.50$ = $665,000

1. Final Base Amount (Line 12): The final base amount is the greater of the FBP calculation ($300,000) or the minimum base amount ($665,000).6

• Final Base Amount = $665,000

1. Excess QREs (Incremental Spending) (Line 15): Total QREs (Line 9) – Final Base Amount (Line 12):

• $1,330,000 – $665,000 = $665,000

1. California Research Credit Calculation (Line 16): 15% of Excess QREs:

• $665,000 \times 0.15$ = $99,750 California Research Credit

Analysis:

In this case study, the $99,750 credit is determined entirely by the 50% minimum base rule. The actual incremental spending calculated using the company’s low statutory 3% FBP would have yielded a credit of $154,500 ($1,330,000 – $300,000 = $1,030,000 incremental QREs $\times$ 15%). The 50% rule reduces the usable credit by $54,750, demonstrating how this mandatory minimum base serves as the dominant factor limiting the final credit amount for many high-spending California innovators, forcing them to operate with an effective tax credit rate that is capped at 7.5% of their total QREs.6

Section VI. Conclusion

The California Research Credit, defined by the necessity of performing IRC Section 41-compliant research exclusively within the state, offers significant tax relief, most notably through its indefinite carryforward provision. However, successful compliance requires navigating several key state-specific non-conformity points and restrictive FTB calculation requirements.

Taxpayers must focus audit defense strategies on two primary areas: first, substantiating that the quality of the research activity meets the rigorous federal Four-Part Test; and second, providing granular, verifiable documentation that allocates expenses (especially wages) strictly to activities conducted within California.

The most critical factor in credit planning is the mandatory 50% minimum base amount rule, which generally supersedes the historical Fixed-Base Percentage calculation and acts as the most significant constraint on the credit size. Furthermore, the legislative changes introduced by SB 711, particularly the repeal of the Alternative Incremental Credit, necessitate an immediate re-evaluation of compliance processes for 2025 returns, pushing more taxpayers toward the complex Regular Credit calculation method. Companies must proactively secure or model their historical fixed-base data to prepare for this transition. By addressing these compliance complexities—the geographical restriction, the 65% contract research limitation, and the 50% minimum base—businesses can strategically maximize the value of this crucial state incentive.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/