Analysis of the Five-Year Refundable Period within the California R&D Tax Credit Framework

The Five-Year Refundable Period is a temporary utilization mechanism allowing taxpayers, whose application of business credits was limited solely by the statutory $5 million cap imposed between 2024 and 2026, to convert 20% of the disallowed credit amount into a cash refund annually over five consecutive years. This provision, made through an irrevocable election using Franchise Tax Board (FTB) Form 3870, addresses liquidity constraints caused by the temporary credit limitation.1

This refundable pathway represents a significant but complex exception to the state’s general rule that the Research and Development (R&D) credit is non-refundable. Detailed compliance and long-term planning are essential, as the distribution of the cash refund is delayed, commencing only in the third taxable year following the year of the election.3

Statutory and Legislative Context of Refundability

The Non-Refundable Baseline and Carryover Rules

The foundation of the California R&D tax credit is derived from federal Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41, with modifications specific to the state’s Revenue and Taxation Code (R&TC). To qualify, research activities must eliminate technical uncertainty regarding the development or improvement of a product or process, and the associated Qualified Research Expenses (QREs)—including wages, supplies, and computer rental costs—must be conducted entirely within California.2

The standard credit is calculated as 15% of qualified expenses exceeding a base amount, plus 24% of basic research payments.5 Historically, the California R&D credit has been non-refundable. If the available credit exceeds the current year’s tax liability, the unused portion cannot be carried back against prior year taxes but is instead carried forward indefinitely until exhausted, applied to the earliest taxable year possible.4

Genesis of the Election: The Temporary $5,000,000 Credit Limitation

The refundable period was introduced as a specific countermeasure to a temporary statewide limit on the utility of business tax credits.

The Limitation Statute (R&TC § 23036.4)

California R&TC Section 23036.4 established a $5,000,000 limitation on the application of all business credits, including any carryovers, that can be used to reduce the “net tax” for personal income filers or “tax” for corporate filers. This critical constraint is effective for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2024, and before January 1, 2027.2 This three-year limitation period was implemented to address state fiscal concerns, effectively converting previously calculated tax assets (the credits) into deferred assets.

An important layer of complexity arises for taxpayers filing combined reports, such as unitary groups of corporations. The $5,000,000 limitation is applied at the group level, not to each individual entity within the combined report.2 In large corporate structures, this necessitates detailed internal negotiation and allocation among all members that generate or utilize credits. Tax departments must determine which entity’s credits should be prioritized for immediate utilization against the shared $5 million cap, and which should be elected for the delayed cash refund mechanism. This decision involves comparing the Net Present Value of immediate tax savings against the delayed, staggered cash flow from the refund.

The Enabling Statute (R&TC § 23036.5)

To mitigate the economic friction caused by freezing substantial tax assets, R&TC Section 23036.5 permits taxpayers to make an irrevocable election to receive an annual refundable amount specifically for credits disallowed solely because of the R&TC § 23036.4 limitation.1 This provision represents the state’s attempt to balance immediate revenue stability (via the cap) with long-term support for California’s innovation sector, ensuring that large-scale R&D investment is not unduly penalized by the temporary restriction on credit usage.

It should also be noted that this period of the $5M limitation coincides with significant changes to how the R&D credit is calculated. Senate Bill 711 (SB 711) aligned California tax law with federal law, introducing the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) calculation method and repealing the Alternative Incremental Method (AIM), effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2025.6 While a refund election made in 2024 establishes a fixed pool of refundable credit based on the rules applicable in 2024, subsequent credit generation (used for tax offset against the $5M cap in 2025 and 2026) will use the new calculation methodologies (Regular or ASC), demanding careful transition management.

The anticipated timeline for the credit limitation and refund election availability is summarized below:

California Business Credit Limitation (R&TC § 23036.4) Timeline

Detailed Mechanics of the Five-Year Refundable Period

Determining the Eligible “Credit Amount”

The determination of the “Credit Amount” eligible for refundability is highly precise. The eligible amount is defined as the qualified credits that would have otherwise been available to reduce the net tax in the taxable year of the election, but for the $5,000,000 limitation under Section 23036.4.1

It is imperative that taxpayers correctly differentiate between credits disallowed by the $5 million cap and credits disallowed because the taxpayer did not have sufficient tax liability to use them, regardless of the cap. Credits that were inherently limited by the taxpayer’s Net Tax liability (e.g., if the tax liability was already exhausted by other means, or if the taxpayer had a net loss) are not eligible for the refund election.2 These amounts must instead be carried over for use in future years. The taxpayer must demonstrate that their credit capacity exceeded $5,000,000 in the year of the election to create an eligible refundable pool.

In the case of a pass-thru entity (such as a partnership or LLC), the “credit amount” refers to the pro rata share or distributive share of the credit passed through to the partner or shareholder. This establishes that the individual owner of the pass-through entity is the party responsible for making the irrevocable election for their portion of the credit.1

The 20% Annual Distribution and Mandatory Timing Delay

The elected refundable credit amount is not disbursed immediately upon filing. It is distributed over five consecutive years, with 20% of the total elected credit claimed in each year.3

Furthermore, the commencement of this distribution schedule is subject to a mandatory delay. The refundable period begins in the third taxable year after the taxable year in which the election is made.2 This deferred payment schedule is a fundamental aspect of the legislation, likely designed to provide a critical period for the state to manage its fiscal resources before commencing cash disbursements related to the temporary credit limitation.

This mandatory waiting period dictates a lengthy relationship between the taxpayer and the elected credit. For instance, an election made with a 2024 tax return (Year 1) means that the years 2025 (Year 2) and 2026 (Year 3) serve as waiting years. The first cash refund payment (the first 20%) will only be received in 2027 (Year 4).9 The final payment for that 2024 credit election will occur in 2031 (Year 8), establishing a nine-year obligation or receivable for the taxpayer (2024 election year + two waiting years + five payment years). The duration of this commitment is critical for corporate planning, particularly when considering events like mergers, acquisitions, or significant changes in business structure, as the successor entity will be bound by the prior irrevocable election and the mandated recovery schedule.

FTB Compliance, Forms, and Irrevocability

Compliance with the refund election requires strict adherence to Franchise Tax Board (FTB) procedural requirements, centered on the newly created FTB Form 3870.

Mandatory Use of FTB Form 3870

The mechanism for making the refund election is the completion and submission of FTB Form 3870, titled Election for Refundable Credit.10 The most critical compliance requirement is that the election is irrevocable once made for the credit generated in that specific year, and it must be filed annually by completing FTB 3870 and attaching it to the original, timely filed tax return.8 The timely filing mandate means that the election cannot be made retroactively on an amended return; failure to include the form with the original filing forfeits the opportunity to refund that year’s disallowed credits.

Calculating Credit Carryover vs. Refund Pool (FTB 3523)

Taxpayers must meticulously coordinate the reporting of R&D credits between FTB 3523 (Research Credit) and FTB 3870 (Refundable Credit Election). The instructions for FTB 3523 explicitly guide taxpayers not to include any amount elected for refundability on FTB 3870 in the calculation of credit carryover available for use in subsequent years.2

If the total disallowed credit exceeds the amount the taxpayer elects to make refundable on FTB 3870, the remaining disallowed portion automatically becomes an extended carryover. The carryover period for such disallowed credits is extended by the number of taxable years the credit was not allowed due to the $5 million limitation.2 This extension ensures that the temporary constraint period does not diminish the longevity of the tax asset.

Entity-Specific Limitations

The statute imposes specific restrictions on entity types. S corporations are expressly prohibited from electing to make credits taken at the entity level refundable.2 As credits flow through to the shareholders on a pro-rata basis (S corporations can pass through 100% of this credit) 2, the election capability resides with the individual shareholder, who applies the credit at the personal income tax level.

The process of converting a deferred tax asset (a credit carryover) into a cash disbursement (a refund) inherently heightens the risk profile of the underlying claim. Given that the state is issuing a cash payment, the FTB is expected to apply enhanced audit scrutiny to ensure the legitimacy of the R&D activities and the accuracy of the QRE substantiation. The taxpayer must be prepared for rigorous review of all required documentation, including taxable wages for qualified services, supply costs, and computer rental expenses, as defined under federal IRC Section 41(b) and R&TC Section 23609.2 Compliance is particularly crucial because the FTB’s Specialized Technical Services Section (STSS) may review agreements to ensure compliance, independently of the regular audit process.13

Strategic Planning and Interaction with Carryovers

Decision Matrix: Electing Refund vs. Retaining Carryover

For any taxpayer exceeding the $5,000,000 cap, a critical financial decision must be made regarding the disallowed credit amount: elect the delayed, periodic cash refund or maintain the indefinite carryover. This decision should be driven by a detailed Net Present Value (NPV) calculation.

1. Liquidity Needs: If the business has immediate or near-term capital needs that outweigh the time value of money lost during the three-year waiting period, electing the refund provides a crucial injection of cash flow, even if staggered over five years. This is often the case for high-growth startups or companies in a temporary loss position.
2. Future Tax Expectations: If the taxpayer anticipates continued, substantial tax liability that will quickly exceed the credit carryover amount once the $5 million cap lifts (i.e., beginning in 2027), the NPV of retaining a full, 100% face-value tax offset may be superior to receiving smaller, delayed cash payments over an extended period (2027 through 2031).

The Treatment of Non-Elected Carryovers

Credits disallowed due to the limitation that are not elected for the refund automatically revert to standard carryover status. The statutory provisions governing this period ensure that the carryover period is extended by the number of taxable years the credit was disallowed due to the $5 million limitation.2 This guarantees that the temporary fiscal measure does not result in the expiration or premature loss of the tax asset, which remains available for full utilization against tax liability once the limitation expires in 2027.

For taxpayers operating as pass-through entities, the decision to elect the refund must be managed at the shareholder or partner level. Since the $5 million limitation applies to the total business credits utilized by the individual taxpayer from all sources, a high-net-worth individual receiving credits from multiple flow-through entities must coordinate their personal use of FTB 3870 across their entire portfolio of business credits to remain under their personal cap. The entity’s corporate planning team must provide clear guidance to these owners on this complex interaction.

Detailed Numerical Example: Refund Election Timeline

To illustrate the mechanics and mandatory delay of the Five-Year Refundable Period, consider the following scenario involving a C Corporation.

Scenario Setup

• Taxpayer: Beta Corp (C Corporation, Taxable Year = Calendar Year).
• Taxable Year (TY) of Election: 2024.
• 2024 Tax Liability (Pre-Credit): $12,000,000.
• 2024 Total Business Credits Available (100% R&D): $7,000,000.
• The Limitation: $5,000,000 Cap (R&TC § 23036.4).

Calculation of the Eligible Refund Pool

1. Total Business Credits Available: $7,000,000.
2. Maximum Credits Applied in 2024 (Limited by Cap): ($5,000,000).
3. Disallowed Credit Amount (Eligible Refund Pool): $2,000,000.

Beta Corp decides to maximize liquidity and elects to make the full $2,000,000 disallowed amount refundable by filing FTB 3870 with its timely 2024 return.

The Annual Refund Payment is calculated as 20% of the elected pool:

$$\text{Annual Refund Payment} = \$2,000,000 \times 20\% = \$400,000$$

The Five-Year Refundable Period Schedule

Since the election is filed for the 2024 taxable year, the refundable period does not begin until the third taxable year following the election, which is 2027.

Table II: Five-Year Refundable Period Timeline Example ($2,000,000 Refund Elected in 2024)

Conclusion

The Five-Year Refundable Period (FTB 3870 election) is a highly technical and temporary tax provision vital for large California taxpayers navigating the 2024–2026 business credit limitation. It successfully bridges the gap between the state’s need for temporary revenue security (via the $5 million cap) and the business community’s requirement for credit monetization and liquidity.

Taxpayers seeking to utilize this election must focus on three core strategic areas:

1. Strict Compliance: The irrevocable, annual election must be made precisely by attaching FTB Form 3870 to the original, timely filed return. Errors in filing or attempts to amend the election later will result in permanent forfeiture of the refund option for that year’s disallowed credits.
2. Eligibility and Quantification: The eligible refund amount must be accurately quantified as the credit disallowed solely by the $5 million cap, excluding any amount that would have been limited by the taxpayer’s underlying net tax liability. This stringent requirement demands meticulous tracking and allocation, particularly within combined reporting groups.
3. Long-Term Cash Flow Modeling: The mandatory three-year deferral of cash payouts mandates long-term financial modeling. Taxpayers commit to a structured cash recovery schedule spanning up to eight years after the election, requiring vigilance in substantiating the underlying R&D claims throughout this period due to elevated audit risk associated with cash disbursements.

Ultimately, the decision to elect the refund option must be treated as a major financing decision, balancing immediate (albeit delayed) cash flow benefits against the long-term, dollar-for-dollar tax savings offered by the standard indefinite credit carryover.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/