Analysis of the Refundable Credit Election in Context with the California R&D Tax Credit Cap

The Refundable Credit Election (RCE) is a temporary, irrevocable option allowing taxpayers to convert R&D credits disallowed solely by California’s $5 million annual business credit cap into a refundable cash payment. This mechanism provides liquidity for otherwise indefinitely carried-forward credits, paid out in five equal installments beginning in the third taxable year following the election.1

I. Executive Summary: The Meaning of the Refundable Credit Election

The RCE is an extraordinary legislative provision designed to mitigate the adverse cash flow impacts of a temporary state-level limitation on the utilization of business tax credits. The California Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credit (Form FTB 3523), like most California business credits, is typically non-refundable and can only be used to offset state tax liability.3 However, during a specific statutory period, the state implemented a hard cap on credit utilization, necessitating a mechanism to preserve the value of generated credits for businesses otherwise unable to use them.

A. Overview of the $5M Credit Limitation Period

The genesis of the RCE lies directly within the temporary credit limitation framework established by the California Revenue and Taxation Code (R&TC). This framework imposes a restriction on the total application of all business credits, including the R&D credit and any prior year credit carryovers, limiting the aggregate tax reduction to $5,000,000 per taxable year.1

This limitation applies to taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2024, and before January 1, 2027.1 The limitation was enacted as a fiscal stability measure, running concurrently with other temporary revenue-generating measures, such as Net Operating Loss (NOL) deduction suspensions.5

The purpose of the RCE, therefore, is to address the potential financial strain caused by having significant amounts of valuable, generated R&D credits trapped above this temporary statutory ceiling. Instead of forcing businesses to carry these credits forward indefinitely, the RCE provides a strategic, albeit delayed, option for cash recovery.2

II. The California Business Credit Limitation Framework

The statutory framework governing credit limitations requires a precise understanding of the Revenue and Taxation Code and the order in which credit limitations are applied.

A. The Legislative Basis: R&TC Sections 23036.4 and 23036.5

The authority for both the temporary $5 million limitation and the subsequent refundable credit election stems from specific sections of the R&TC. For corporate filers, the relevant statutes are Sections 23036.4 and 23036.5. Analogous sections (17039.4 and 17039.5) apply to personal income filers.1 These provisions define the scope of the limitation and the mechanics of the elective refund.

The $5,000,000 cap is an aggregate limit applied to the total pool of business credits available to the taxpayer, including the R&D credit (calculated on FTB 3523) and carryovers generated in prior years.1 For multi-entity C-corporations that file a combined report in California, the $5,000,000 limitation is applied at the group level, rather than being available to each individual legal entity within the unitary group.1

B. Credit Application Hierarchy and Eligibility for RCE

A nuanced point of compliance is the hierarchy of credit application. The RCE is specifically targeted at credits disallowed due to the $5,000,000 cap, and not credits that would have been limited by the taxpayer’s underlying tax liability even without the cap.

The Franchise Tax Board (FTB) guidance emphasizes that credit limited by a taxpayer’s general tax liability cannot be included in an election for refundable credit.1 This means that the $5 million cap is applied after the standard credit limitation rules have been run. If a credit cannot be claimed because the taxpayer has insufficient net tax liability (e.g., they have already reduced their tax down to the minimum franchise tax of $800 or the Alternative Minimum Tax, which cannot be reduced by the R&D credit 2), that unused credit is not eligible for the RCE. It must instead be carried over indefinitely.1

The analysis must first confirm that the taxpayer had enough tax liability to utilize the credit had the $5 million cap not existed. Only the isolated amount that exceeds the $5 million threshold, which was blocked solely by the temporary statutory cap, qualifies for the refundable election. This requires rigorous calculation and documentation on the tax return to isolate the exact dollar amount disallowed by this secondary, temporary ceiling.

The following table summarizes the status of R&D credits based on how they are limited:

Credit Hierarchy and RCE Eligibility

III. Defining the Refundable Credit Election (RCE) and Compliance

The mechanics of making the election are governed by specific FTB forms and strict statutory deadlines, underscoring the irrevocable nature of the decision.

A. Core Principle: Converting Trapped Credit into Future Cash Flow

The California R&D credit is traditionally a non-refundable credit, carried forward indefinitely until exhausted.2 The RCE is an explicit legislative departure from this rule, recognizing that forcing large corporate taxpayers to indefinitely carry forward credits that they would otherwise use creates an unnecessary distortion during the temporary cap period. By electing the RCE, 100% of the cap-disallowed portion of the credit is converted into a guaranteed cash refund paid out over five years.1

B. The Compliance Tool: FTB Form 3870

The election to convert cap-disallowed credits into a refundable stream is made using Form FTB 3870, Election for Refundable Credit.1 This form is mandatory for the election.

The critical compliance requirement is that Form FTB 3870 must be submitted with the taxpayer’s original, timely filed tax return for the taxable year in which the limitation applies (e.g., the 2024 tax year).1 Taxpayers must ensure that the amount elected as refundable on the specific credit form (such as the R&D credit form, FTB 3523, line 49) matches the amount entered on Form FTB 3870, line 1, column (c), ensuring strict coordination between the credit calculation and the refund election documentation.1

C. Mandatory Requirements and Restrictions (FTB Guidance)

The FTB guidance outlines several critical rules that govern the RCE:

1. Irrevocability: The RCE is a one-time, irrevocable choice made for the applicable tax year.1 This prevents strategic manipulation of the election based on fluctuating tax forecasts in future years and necessitates robust long-term tax modeling before making the election.
2. The Universal Election Rule (All-or-Nothing Principle): This is one of the most restrictive rules governing the RCE. If a taxpayer elects the refundable treatment for their R&D credits disallowed by the $5 million cap, they must make the same election for all other business credits claimed that year that were also disallowed solely due to the $5,000,000 limitation.1 Furthermore, a taxpayer may not elect to have a partial amount of their disallowed credit be refundable.1 This mandates a unified strategy: the entire cap-disallowed amount for all applicable credits must either be elected for refundability or retained for standard carryover.6
3. Entity Restrictions: S corporations may not elect to make credits taken at the entity level refundable.1 The R&D credit generated by an S corporation is typically passed through to its shareholders on a pro-rata basis.1

D. Implications for Credit Assignment

The decision to elect the RCE carries significant implications, particularly for unitary groups that utilize credit assignment via Form FTB 3544 to shift credits between members.7

Once the RCE is elected, the specific credit amount is converted from a tax attribute into a scheduled refund payment stream. The amount elected as refundable must be explicitly excluded from the calculation of credit carryover available for future years.1

By committing to the RCE, a multi-entity corporation is effectively withdrawing that credit value from its pool of assignable tax attributes. This means the credit can no longer be strategically assigned to other high-income members of the group in future years via FTB 3544, even if those members later realize increased profitability that exceeds the $5 million cap. The taxpayer trades the strategic flexibility of a tax attribute for the certainty of a scheduled cash payment.

IV. Financial Modeling: The Delayed Five-Year Payout Schedule

The financial calculus underpinning the RCE decision must account for the required payout structure, which significantly affects the time value of the credit recovered.

A. The 20% Annual Offset Mechanism

The Refundable Credit Election results in a five-year refundable period. Taxpayers may claim 20% of the total elected refundable credit amount in each year of this five-year period.1 This structure ensures that 100% of the cap-disallowed credit is recovered through the refund mechanism over the seven-year timeline.

B. The Two-Year Delay: The Payout Start Date

A critical factor in the financial evaluation is the start date of the refund period. The five-year refundable period does not commence immediately upon election. Instead, it begins in the third taxable year after the taxable year in which the election is made.1

For example, if a company makes the irrevocable RCE on its 2024 tax return (Year 1), the first 20% refundable payment will not be received until the 2026 tax year (Year 3), which is typically filed in 2027. The final payment would subsequently be received in the 2030 tax year.

The following table illustrates the payout timeline for an RCE made in 2024:

Refundable Credit Payout Timeline (RCE Made in Tax Year 2024)

C. Net Present Value (NPV) Analysis and Strategic Trade-offs

The substantial two-year delay and the staggered five-year distribution schedule significantly reduce the Net Present Value (NPV) of the elected credit amount compared to an immediate tax offset. Taxpayers must rigorously model the economic benefit of the RCE versus the alternative of carrying the credit forward.

If the RCE is not elected, the disallowed credits revert to their standard status as indefinite carryovers.2 The law also explicitly states that the carryover period for disallowed credit is extended by the number of taxable years the credit was not allowed.1 While the R&D credit already carries forward indefinitely, this provision ensures that other limited business credits with defined expiration dates do not lapse solely due to the temporary $5 million cap.

The strategic decision hinges on the taxpayer’s cost of capital and future tax forecasts. The RCE provides guaranteed, scheduled liquidity, which is highly valuable for high-growth companies that require immediate operating capital or project minimal state tax liability exceeding the $5 million cap for several years. Conversely, if a taxpayer projects a substantial increase in taxable income immediately after the cap sunsets (i.e., in 2027), the ability to use the carryover for a dollar-for-dollar tax offset starting in 2027 would generally provide a higher NPV than the delayed refund tranches.

V. Case Study: Corporate R&D Credit Utilization and the RCE

This example illustrates how a C-corporation analyzes the application hierarchy and the financial outcomes of the RCE decision for Tax Year 2024.

A. Scenario Setup (Tax Year 2024)

A California C-Corporation, part of a unitary group, generates significant R&D activity.

B. Step-by-Step Application Hierarchy

The corporation applies its credits against its $15,000,000 net tax liability, subject to the two statutory limitations:

The company successfully utilizes $5,000,000 of its credits in 2024. The remaining $5,500,000 is disallowed solely by the temporary cap and is therefore eligible for the RCE.1

C. Decision Point Analysis

The corporation must now choose between electing the RCE for the $5,500,000 or retaining it as an indefinite carryover.

Option A: Elect Refundable Credit (FTB 3870)

The company files FTB 3870 for the full $5,500,000 (mandated by the all-or-nothing rule 1). This amount is excluded from future carryover calculations.1 The payout schedule is as follows:

• 2024 (Election Year): No payment.
• 2025: No payment (Waiting Period).
• 2026 (Payout Year 1): $1,100,000 (20% of $5.5M is received as a refund).
• 2027 through 2030 (Payout Years 2-5): $1,100,000 received annually.

Total Refund Received: $5,500,000, spread over seven years (2024–2030).

Option B: No Election (Carryover)

The company chooses not to file FTB 3870. The full $5,500,000 is retained as an indefinite credit carryover.1 This amount will be available in 2025 and 2026, subject again to the $5,000,000 cap. Crucially, assuming the cap sunsets as scheduled, the entire $5,500,000 (minus any amounts used in 2025 or 2026) will be fully available in 2027 to offset up to $5,500,000 of California tax liability dollar-for-dollar.

VI. Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

The Refundable Credit Election related to the California R&D credit and the associated $5 million cap is a complex, time-sensitive planning matter for large taxpayers. It introduces an option for liquidity where none previously existed, but at the cost of immediate value and strategic flexibility.

A. Key Compliance Synthesis

The RCE demands absolute adherence to FTB guidelines, particularly regarding timing and scope. The irrevocable nature of the election and the requirement to file Form FTB 3870 with the original, timely filed return underscore the need for early decision-making.1

Furthermore, the universal election rule dictates that taxpayers cannot cherry-pick which credits to make refundable; the election must encompass all business credits disallowed by the $5 million cap in that specific tax year.1 This necessitates a comprehensive inventory and risk assessment of all business credits held by the taxpayer or unitary group.

B. Strategic Planning Considerations

The decision matrix for the RCE must weigh the certainty of a delayed cash refund against the flexibility and higher instantaneous value of a tax credit offset.

1. High Need for Liquidity: The RCE is economically advantageous for entities that urgently require cash flow to fund research and development or operations, especially if they anticipate long-term periods of low profitability or large NOLs that would prevent credit utilization for many years.
2. Projected Post-Cap Taxable Income: Taxpayers expecting high taxable income starting in 2027 (when the $5 million cap is currently scheduled to sunset 1) should favor the carryover option. The ability to use $5.5 million in carryover to immediately reduce a $15 million tax bill in 2027 is financially superior to receiving $1.1 million annually from 2026 through 2030.

Impact on Unitary Group Planning: For multi-entity groups, electing the RCE removes the chosen amount from the assignable pool of credits (Form FTB 3544), thereby limiting the tax planning options across the entire unitary group in future years. If the group has members with high, immediate tax liability potential, retaining the carryover for assignment may be the preferred strategic choice.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/