Sourcing Qualified Research Expenses: Defining “Research Activities Conducted Within California” for the R&D Tax Credit

I. Executive Summary: The California Localization Mandate

The definition of “Research Activities Conducted Within California” refers to Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) arising exclusively from R&D services, supplies, and contract performance physically occurring within the state’s borders. This strict geographic sourcing requirement is mandated by the California Revenue and Taxation Code (R&TC) to incentivize and subsidize in-state innovation.

The California Research Credit, codified primarily under Revenue and Taxation Code (R&TC) Section 23609, serves as a pivotal state incentive designed to encourage businesses to substantially invest in innovation within California.1 For companies operating across multiple states, the state’s approach to calculating the Qualified Research Credit (QRC) requires a rigorous geographical filter for every expense component, marking a critical difference from the federal R&D tax credit.3 This location-based mandate means that eligibility hinges not just on the type of activity performed, but fundamentally on where that activity physically occurs.1 The primary compliance concern for multi-state firms is the necessity to precisely segregate R&D expenses incurred outside of California, as a failure to meticulously document the physical location of services renders those expenses non-qualified for the state credit, even if the underlying activity itself meets the federal definition.

II. Statutory Framework and Eligibility Prerequisites

A. California Revenue and Taxation Code (R&TC) Basis

The California R&D Credit, referred to interchangeably as the Research Credit or RDC, is available to taxpayers under both the Personal Income Tax (PIT) and the Corporation Tax (CT).5 The statutory foundation is primarily R&TC Section 23609 for corporations, which largely aligns with the federal credit provisions of Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41.4 California law generally conforms to the IRC as of January 1, 2015, which dictates the definitions of qualified research and qualified research expenses.6 This standard conformity is essential because it anchors the foundational eligibility criteria in well-established federal tax law principles.

B. Defining Qualified Research Activity (QRA): The Four-Part Test

To qualify for the California Research Credit, the research activity must satisfy the same stringent four-part test that applies to the federal R&D credit.1 Adherence to this test ensures that the activities claimed are truly technological, experimental, and aimed at resolving genuine scientific or technical uncertainty.

1. Qualified Purpose (Permitted Purpose): The research activities must be performed in an attempt to improve the functionality, performance, reliability, or quality of a new or existing business component, such as a product, process, technique, formula, or software.7
2. Elimination of Technical Uncertainty: The activity must be undertaken to discover information that eliminates technical uncertainty concerning the development or improvement of the business component.7 This core element focuses on the intellectual challenge inherent in the project.
3. Process of Experimentation: The activities must involve a process of experimentation, which includes systematic trials, testing, modeling, simulating, and systematic trial and error designed to resolve the identified technical uncertainties.7
4. Technological in Nature: The foundation of the research must rely on the principles of physical or biological science, engineering, or computer science.7

C. Critical Financial and Rate Comparisons

While California conforms to the federal standards for determining what constitutes qualified research, it diverges significantly in the calculation methodologies and rates, particularly concerning QREs and the base calculation.

The credit rate is equal to 15% of qualified expenses that exceed a calculated base amount.1 Furthermore, corporations may claim an additional 24% credit for basic research payments made to qualified nonprofit organizations.1

A fundamental compliance tension arises because California requires conformity to the federal four-part activity test but imposes state-specific financial and geographical limitations. For example, a qualified research expense performed by a contractor in Arizona, while federally eligible, yields zero California credit due to the state’s stringent sourcing rule.4 Even for eligible expenses, the lower inclusion rate for contract research (65% versus federal 75%) means the calculation must be executed separately, necessitating distinct documentation systems for state versus federal filings.1

III. The Cornerstone Requirement: Sourcing Expenses “Within California”

A. General Principle of Geographic Sourcing

The defining characteristic of the California Research Credit is the statutory prerequisite that all qualified research activities must be physically performed in California.4 The Franchise Tax Board (FTB) emphasizes this location-based mandate, making accurate apportionment of Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) across state lines the most complex element of compliance for multi-state enterprises. The QREs generally recognized by California include wages, supplies, and contract research costs, all subject to this geographic mandate.4

B. Detailed Allocation of Qualified Wages

Qualified wages constitute compensation paid for “qualified services,” which include the direct performance, direct supervision, or direct support of qualified research activities.9 These are typically federal taxable wages reported on Form W-2.15

For multi-state employers, the allocation of employee wages to the California QRE pool must be meticulous. Wages are sourced based on the percentage of the employee’s time spent performing qualified services physically within California.3 The FTB provides guidance that compensation must be directly related to the research activities and paid by the taxpayer.14 This excludes indirect costs, such as the allocation of wages from general administrative, purchasing, or receiving departments.14 Furthermore, non-taxable compensation components like fringe benefits and deferred compensation are explicitly non-qualifying expenditures for this credit.14

The requirement to verify that compensation is directly related to research activities and performed within California means that simple, high-level estimates of R&D time are insufficient for multi-state apportionment. Taxpayers must rely on granular, location-specific time tracking systems to defend the apportionment ratio. Required supporting records include payroll registers, employee W-2s, detailed job descriptions, duty statements, and time-tracking documentation that logs time allocated to specific qualified projects and physical locations.14 Without this stringent, location-based documentation, the FTB is likely to disallow QRE wages claimed for employees who split their time between California and other jurisdictions.

C. Sourcing of Qualified Supplies and Computer Rental Costs

Qualified supplies encompass tangible property that is consumed directly in the research activity, or that goes into a prototype, excluding land, improvements to land, and depreciable property.14

The sourcing rule for supplies is straightforwardly physical: the expense qualifies only if the supplies are physically consumed in the R&D process within California.14 For instance, materials purchased globally but used exclusively in a California laboratory facility are includible. Conversely, if a multi-state firm uses an identical material set in an out-of-state facility, the cost attributable to that out-of-state consumption must be excluded from the California QRE pool.

Similarly, costs incurred for the rental or lease of computers (including cloud computing) used in qualified research must be sourced to California to the extent the use occurs in the performance of the qualified research activity within the state.9

D. Rigid Rules for Contract Research Expenses (CREs)

The rules governing Contract Research Expenses (CREs) represent the most significant divergence from federal conformity and impose the highest compliance burden on multi-state taxpayers.

The Franchise Tax Board (FTB) explicitly mandates that to be included as a California QRE, the performance of all the contract research must be performed in California.17 This is an “all-or-nothing” principle. If a taxpayer contracts a third party to conduct research, and any portion of that work—even a small fraction—is physically executed outside of California, the entire contract amount is deemed non-qualified for the state credit.17

Assuming the research is performed entirely in California, the includible expense is limited to 65% of the contract amount.1 This rate is slightly more generous, 75%, if the research is performed by a qualified research consortium.9

This stringent “all-or-nothing” rule for CREs dictates operational outsourcing decisions for California companies. It strongly incentivizes firms to use only in-state contractors for R&D services or to secure ironclad contractual verification and documentation proving 100% in-state performance. Any ambiguity regarding the contractor’s work location effectively renders the entire CRE expense non-qualified for the state R&D credit, regardless of its federal eligibility.

IV. FTB Guidance and Compliance Mechanisms

A. Claiming the Credit: Form FTB 3523

Taxpayers claim the California Research Credit by filing their income or franchise tax return and attaching Form FTB 3523, Research Credit.12 This form serves to compute the amount of research credit generated, whether by the entity itself or received as a pass-through credit from S corporations, partnerships, or LLCs.6 The instructions for FTB 3523 confirm that while the California credit is based on the federal IRC Section 41 definition of qualified research expenses, claiming the federal credit is not a prerequisite for claiming the state credit.6

B. Determining the California Base Amount

The calculation of the incremental credit—the 15% rate applied to the excess of current QREs—requires the determination of the California Base Amount.10 California strictly requires the use of the Fixed-Base Percentage Method.1

1. Fixed-Base Calculation: The Fixed-Base Amount is the product of the Fixed-Base Percentage multiplied by the average annual California gross receipts for the four preceding tax years.4 For an apportioning business, the relevant receipts used in the base calculation are those attributable to California, aligning with R&TC Section 24341 definitions.10
2. 50% Floor Rule: A crucial limitation is the 50% floor rule, which states that the final calculated base amount cannot be less than 50% of the current year’s California QREs.6 This floor acts as a minimum threshold, preventing taxpayers with low historical base percentages from claiming disproportionately large credits against a sudden surge in current-year QREs. If the base amount calculated via the fixed percentage exceeds the current QREs, the credit amount is zero.6

C. Limitations and Carryover Provisions

The strategic value of the California R&D credit is heavily influenced by its applicability and longevity.

A significant, albeit temporary, statutory constraint affects large credit users. For taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2024, and before January 1, 2027, there is a $5,000,000 limitation on the application of combined business credits.6 This cap means large corporations must carefully prioritize which credits to utilize in these years.

A major benefit of the California credit is the indefinite carryforward provision. Any unused credit amount may be carried over to future tax years until it is fully exhausted.1 This contrasts sharply with the federal 20-year carryforward limit.1 The combination of the temporary $5 million credit application cap and the indefinite carryforward necessitates careful tax planning. Tax departments must meticulously track the vintage of credit carryovers (the year generated) 20 and prioritize the use of credits with expiration dates, knowing that the R&D credits will retain their full value for the long term. This indefinite nature creates a substantial tax asset, illustrated by reports showing that major technology companies have accumulated billions of dollars in California R&D credit carryovers.11

V. Complexities for Multi-State Taxpayers

A. Apportionment Factor Interaction

For multi-state entities, the FTB uses the single sales factor apportionment formula to determine taxable business income sourced to California, relying on market-based sourcing for sales of services.21 This apportionment method is distinct from the physical sourcing rules for QREs.

The determination of the California R&D credit base utilizes California gross receipts.10 This creates a particular dynamic for companies that conduct significant R&D within California (resulting in high CA QREs) but market and sell their resulting products or services primarily outside the state (leading to low CA gross receipts). In this scenario, the base amount calculation, being a function of lower CA gross receipts, is minimized. A lower base amount maximizes the incremental QREs subject to the 15% credit rate, effectively rewarding businesses that perform R&D locally but operate a global market strategy.

B. Unitary Groups and Credit Assignment

California allows corporations that are members of a unitary combined reporting group to assign credits to an affiliated corporation within the same group.2 This mechanism is crucial when R&D activities are centralized in a legal entity that generates substantial credits but has minimal California income, while high operating income is realized by another affiliated entity. Without the ability to assign the credit, the tax benefit might remain stranded.3

Credit assignments are formalized using FTB Form 3544, Assignment of Credit to Affiliated Corporation.20 The compliance rules for assignment are strict: the assigned credit must retain its original generation date (vintage) for tracking and application purposes, and once assigned, the credit cannot be reassigned to another entity.20 Utilization of Form 3544 allows tax departments to optimize the application of the R&D credit across the combined reporting structure, maximizing immediate tax savings.

C. Reduction Election (IRC Section 280C)

Federal law generally requires that a taxpayer’s deduction for research expenditures must be reduced by the amount of the current year’s R&D credit, unless the taxpayer elects the reduced credit under IRC Section 280C(c).14 California conforms to this rule under R&TC Section 24440.14

For a taxpayer that apportions its income to California (meaning its apportionment factor is less than 100%), the decision to elect the reduced credit requires careful analysis. If the taxpayer takes the full deduction for R&D expenditures (thereby not electing the reduced credit), a required “add-back” adjustment to taxable income is created. Because this increased income flows through the state’s apportionment factor (which is less than 100%), the effective tax cost resulting from the income add-back is minimized in California. This often results in a smaller “net” R&D tax credit benefit reduction than if the reduced credit election had been made, making the election potentially disadvantageous for California purposes.3 Taxpayers must quantify this complex interplay between the deduction reduction, apportionment, and the credit value to determine the optimal tax strategy.

VI. Practical Example: Allocation and Calculation for a Multi-State Firm

This example illustrates the critical sourcing and calculation steps required for a multi-state corporation (TechCo, Inc.) filing a California return.

A. Case Study Setup: TechCo, Inc.

TechCo, Inc. maintains its headquarters and primary R&D facility in San Jose, CA, and has a satellite software engineering office in Portland, Oregon.

B. Step-by-Step California QRE Determination (Sourcing)

The following steps demonstrate the aggressive filtering required by the FTB’s physical performance mandate.

1. Calculate California Qualified Wages: Wages are sourced based on the percentage of time physically spent performing qualified research in California.3

• Employee A: $\$150,000 \times 100\% = \$150,000$
• Employee B: $\$120,000 \times 75\% = \$90,000$
• Employee C: $\$100,000 \times 0\% = \$0$ (Excluded as 100% performed out-of-state).
• Total CA Qualified Wages: $\$240,000$

1. Calculate California Qualified Supplies: Supplies must be physically consumed in California.14

• Supplies used in CA: $60,000 (The $20,000 used in Oregon is excluded).

1. Calculate California Contract Research Expense (CRE): This expense is subject to the strict “all-or-nothing” rule.17

• The total CRE of $\$50,000$ is $0 CA QRE.
• Rationale: Although the contractor is based in California, 5% of the research performance was outsourced to India. Because not 100% of the performance occurred in California, the entire contract expense is disqualified for the California credit.17

1. Determine Total California QREs (Current Year):

• Total CA QREs = $\$240,000$ (Wages) + $\$60,000$ (Supplies) + $\$0$ (CRE) = $300,000

C. Final Credit Calculation

The calculation proceeds using the Regular Credit method, as mandated by California law.1

1. Calculate Fixed-Base Amount (Pre-Floor): This is calculated based on historical California gross receipts.

• Fixed-Base Percentage ($0.12$) $\times$ Average CA Gross Receipts $(\$10,000,000) = \$1,200,000$

1. Calculate 50% Floor: The base amount cannot fall below 50% of the current year’s CA QREs.10

• $0.50 \times$ Current Year CA QREs $(\$300,000) = \$150,000$

1. Determine Final CA Base Amount: The base amount is the lesser of Step 5 ($\$1,200,000$) or Step 6 ($\$150,000$).6

• Final CA Base Amount: $150,000 (The 50% floor applies here, as the historical base is significantly higher than 50% of the current, sourced CA QREs).

1. Calculate Incremental QREs:

• CA QREs $(\$300,000)$ – Final CA Base Amount $(\$150,000) = **\$150,000**$

1. Calculate Final Regular Credit: The credit rate is 15% of the incremental QREs.1

• Incremental QREs $(\$150,000) \times 0.15 = **\$22,500**$

Table 3: Hypothetical California R&D Credit Calculation Summary

VII. Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

The California Research Credit represents a valuable, non-expiring tax asset for innovative businesses, but its realization is fundamentally dependent upon rigorous compliance with state-specific geographical sourcing mandates. The successful claiming of the credit transitions from a simple accounting exercise to a complex, operations-driven compliance function.

A. Summary of Key Compliance Risk Areas

The primary audit risk for multi-state firms centers on the failure to adequately support the physical location of the qualified activity. The differences between federal and state rules are not minor computational adjustments but structural barriers to entry for out-of-state expenses. The highest risk areas include:

1. Wages and Allocation: Using aggregate time estimates or applying apportionment factors designed for income (like single sales factor) to wage expenses will be challenged by the FTB. Taxpayers must defend qualified wages based on detailed, location-specific time sheets and project documentation.15
2. Contract Research Integrity: The FTB’s requirement that 100% of contract research be performed within California necessitates extreme due diligence regarding subcontractors and vendor agreements.17 The discovery of minor out-of-state performance can lead to the total disallowance of substantial contract research QREs.

B. Strategic Recommendations for Maximizing the Credit

1. Implement Location-Based Time Tracking: Integrate time allocation systems that capture both the qualified nature of the work (meeting the 4-part test) and the physical location (within California) for all R&D personnel. This includes employees directly performing research, direct supervisors, and direct support personnel. This practice is necessary to satisfy the FTB’s need for verifiable evidence that the R&D incentive is tied to in-state employment.3
2. Contractual Sourcing Requirements: Review and amend all research vendor and contract agreements to mandate explicitly that 100% of performance must occur within California, providing a legal basis for requiring location-specific documentation from third parties.
3. Optimize Unitary Credit Assignment: Within a combined reporting group, strategically use FTB Form 3544 to assign credits from entities that generated them (e.g., R&D subsidiaries) to affiliated entities with immediate California tax liability. This prevents the immediate stranding of credits, while leveraging the benefit of the indefinite carryforward provision.1
4. Analyze Deduction Election: Taxpayers who apportion income must analyze the impact of the IRC Section 280C reduction election (and its corresponding R&TC Section 24440 conformity) on their overall tax liability. Due to the apportionment mechanism, for many high-apportioning multi-state firms, electing the reduced credit may result in a smaller net tax benefit than taking the full deduction and accepting the subsequent apportioned income add-back.3

Monitor Temporary Limitations: Maintain active tracking of the temporary $5,000,000 limitation on the application of combined business credits (2024-2027).6 This necessitates strategic planning for credit prioritization, ensuring the indefinite R&D credits are carried forward while other, potentially expiring, credits are utilized first, thereby maximizing the long-term value of the R&D credit asset.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/