The Elimination of Uncertainty: Substantiation Requirements for the Colorado R&D Tax Credit
The Elimination of Uncertainty criterion mandates that research activities must be intended to discover information necessary to overcome technical unknowns regarding the development or improvement of a product or process. Uncertainty is established when the information available to the taxpayer does not readily confirm the capability, appropriate design, or methodology required to achieve the desired business component improvement.1
This report provides a detailed analysis of the Elimination of Uncertainty (EoU) requirement as the cornerstone of the four-part test for claiming the Colorado Enterprise Zone (EZ) Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credit. The discussion incorporates essential guidance from Colorado state revenue authorities and addresses the rigorous substantiation standards established by recent federal tax court precedent.
The Foundational Framework: IRC Section 41 and the Four-Part Test
The Colorado R&D Tax Credit is inextricably linked to the federal definition of “qualified research” outlined in Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41. Compliance with the state credit under the Enterprise Zone Program necessitates satisfying all criteria of the federal four-part test.5 These four mandatory elements—Permitted Purpose, Elimination of Uncertainty, Process of Experimentation, and Technological in Nature—must all be met for an activity’s associated expenditures (QREs) to qualify for tax incentives.2
The Criterion of Elimination of Uncertainty (The Core Requirement)
The Elimination of Uncertainty criterion specifically requires that the research activity be undertaken for the purpose of discovering information that resolves a technical unknown.2 This intent must be documented clearly before the commencement of the research.
Defining Technical Uncertainty
Uncertainty exists when the taxpayer lacks sufficient technical information to establish one of three specific elements related to the development or improvement of the business component 3:
- Capability: Whether it is technically possible (feasible) to achieve the desired functional improvement or develop the new component.
- Methodology: If capability is confirmed, what specific process, technique, or sequence of steps should be employed to achieve the desired result.
- Appropriate Design: What optimal configuration, formula, or set of specifications must be implemented to achieve the required performance improvements.
The research activity itself must be expenditures representing research and development costs in the experimental or laboratory sense, as they are specifically for activities intended to discover information that would eliminate this uncertainty.3 Costs incurred even after production begins may still qualify if they are related to research intended to eliminate uncertainty concerning the product’s development or improvement.4
The Interplay of the Four Tests
The successful application of the Elimination of Uncertainty criterion is highly dependent on the other three tests:
- Permitted Purpose: The component being researched must aim to improve its functionality, performance, quality, or reliability.1 The identified uncertainty must relate directly to achieving this qualified improvement.2
- Technological in Nature: The principles used to eliminate the uncertainty must be derived from the hard sciences, including physical sciences, biological sciences, engineering, or computer science.2 This ensures the research relies on scientific principles, not common knowledge or managerial expertise.
- Process of Experimentation: The activities must employ a systematic methodology to test alternatives and resolve the identified uncertainty.8 If the initial uncertainty is not established, any subsequent systematic testing is typically categorized as routine quality control or optimization, resulting in the failure of both the EoU and Experimentation tests simultaneously.
Colorado’s Enterprise Zone Program and R&D Credit Mechanics
The Colorado R&D Tax Credit is a vital component of the state’s Enterprise Zone (EZ) Program, designed to encourage investment in economically distressed areas.13
The Colorado R&D Credit Calculation and Structure
The credit is nonrefundable and is available only to businesses conducting qualified research activities (QRAs) within one of the state’s 16 designated EZs.5
- Credit Rate: The state income tax credit equals 3% of the increase in annual QREs.13
- Incremental Base: The credit is calculated based on the excess of the QREs incurred during the current tax year over the taxpayer’s average QREs from the preceding two tax years within the same EZ.6 If no QREs existed in one or both of the base years, zero is used for the calculation of the average.13
Long-Term Strategic Implications
The structure of the Colorado credit mandates a limitation on annual usage: a taxpayer may claim no more than 25% of the total credit generated in the current year.6 Importantly, any credit amount exceeding the annual limit can be carried forward indefinitely until it is fully utilized.13
This combination of a restricted annual claim percentage and an unlimited carryforward period requires businesses to view the Colorado EZ R&D credit as a long-term, amortizable tax asset rather than a singular annual deduction. Since the benefit is realized over many years, often a decade or more, the original documentation proving that the activity met the Elimination of Uncertainty criterion must be maintained meticulously for the entire carryforward period. This extends the necessary document retention well beyond typical federal tax audit cycles.15
Colorado Revenue Office Guidance and Compliance
Successful utilization of the Colorado EZ R&D credit requires procedural compliance with the Office of Economic Development and International Trade (OEDIT) and the Colorado Department of Revenue (CDOR).
OEDIT Pre-Certification Mandate
OEDIT oversees the EZ Program and directs businesses to review the Enterprise Zone Income Tax Credit Guide for comprehensive eligibility details.13 A critical procedural step is the requirement for pre-certification from the local EZ Administrator, which must be secured prior to commencing the business activity that will generate the R&D credits.14
The necessity of obtaining mandatory local pre-certification introduces a unique procedural risk to the claim. Even if a business executes research activities that perfectly meet the technical Elimination of Uncertainty standard, failure to secure this administrative pre-certification can invalidate the state credit entirely. This makes adherence to the EZ program rules as crucial as technical compliance with IRC Section 41.
CDOR Filing and Dispute Resolution
To claim the credit, taxpayers must submit CDOR Form DR1366, the “Enterprise Zone Credit and Carryforward Schedule,” along with the EZ Tax Credit Certificates.9 Pass-through entities must also include Form DR0078a for credit distribution.13
Should the CDOR deny a claim—frequently based on a lack of adequate substantiation for the Elimination of Uncertainty—taxpayers may file a written protest. This initiates a review process, often involving a pre-hearing conference with the Tax Conferee Section, intended to resolve disputes before a formal administrative hearing.18
Nuanced Application: Audit Defense and Documentation
The standard for proving the Elimination of Uncertainty has been rigorously defined by recent federal litigation, emphasizing that high-quality, contemporaneous documentation is mandatory for a defensible R&D credit claim.
Defining Uncertainty “At the Outset”
Recent Tax Court decisions, such as Phoenix Design Group, Inc. v. Commissioner (2024), highlight that general complexity or iterative design changes are insufficient to satisfy the EoU requirement.20 The court requires that taxpayers demonstrate the presence of a specific, defined technical uncertainty at the project’s inception.
The uncertainty must be technological in nature, meaning it must relate to a scientific or engineering unknown. Routine work, such as standard measurement, ordinary testing for quality control, or merely complying with existing building codes, does not constitute qualified research intended to eliminate uncertainty.20 Taxpayers must prove they were seeking information not readily available, distinguishing their work from routine optimization or production preparation.
Documentary Strategy to Prove Elimination of Uncertainty
A robust documentation strategy must link qualified expenses (QREs) directly to the systematic activities undertaken to resolve the identified technical uncertainty.
Key documentation required to substantiate the Elimination of Uncertainty includes:
- Project Narrative: A contemporaneous technical summary written before the project begins, detailing the specific knowledge gaps (capability, methodology, or design) that necessitate the research.21
- Alternatives Assessment: Records detailing the alternatives that were considered and evaluated to overcome the technical barriers.9
- Testing and Iteration Records: Engineering notes, test protocols, simulation results, and material analyses that confirm the systematic evaluation process used to resolve the uncertainty.21
- Documentation of Failures: Records detailing failed prototypes, unexpected results, or scientific dead ends are highly valuable. Documentation of these failures provides compelling evidence that the technical solution was not obvious and confirms the existence of a bona fide technical uncertainty that required genuine discovery to resolve. This transforms unsuccessful testing into a critical piece of evidence supporting the claim.
The increased scrutiny, formalized by court rulings, requires businesses to align their technical reporting practices with tax compliance needs, ensuring upfront substantiation is available to support the claim that an essential technical unknown was resolved.12
Case Study: Eliminating Uncertainty in a Colorado Enterprise Zone Project
To illustrate the application of the Elimination of Uncertainty criterion and the subsequent calculation of the Colorado credit, consider the following example of an advanced manufacturer located in an EZ.
Scenario: High-Precision Component Manufacturing
Taxpayer: Summit Robotics Corp., a company located within the Colorado Springs Enterprise Zone, specializing in robotic precision parts.
Activity: Summit Robotics is developing a new, high-density metal alloy component for a new product line. This component requires novel processing to achieve unprecedented internal density while maintaining zero residual stress.
The Uncertainty (Methodology): Summit Robotics was uncertain about the appropriate heat treatment and cooling methodology necessary to achieve the specific density and stress reduction requirements simultaneously.4 Standard annealing methods resulted in unacceptable stress levels, and proprietary methods from other manufacturers were not publicly available or applicable to this new alloy.
Documentation and Resolution:
- Technical Identification: The engineering team documented the lack of established scientific literature regarding the specific temperature curve required for this alloy combination, confirming the initial methodology uncertainty.
- Experimentation: Summit ran systematic trials involving complex thermal modeling and physical testing of multiple processing alternatives. QREs included the wages of engineers performing these trials and the cost of the specialty gases used for cooling (supplies).14
- Resolution: After several failed, stress-ridden prototypes (documented as evidence of genuine uncertainty), the team discovered a novel two-stage cooling curve involving a precise inert gas pressure differential, eliminating the technical uncertainty regarding the appropriate methodology.
QRE History (Colorado EZ Only):
- 2022 QREs: $900,000
- 2023 QREs: $1,300,000
- 2024 QREs (Current Year): $2,100,000
Calculation of the Colorado EZ R&D Credit (2024 Tax Year)
The calculation demonstrates the process of determining the credit based on the proven qualified research activities that successfully eliminated uncertainty.
Table 3: Colorado EZ R&D Credit Calculation for Summit Robotics
| Feature | Calculation/Data Point | Result |
| Current Year QREs (A) | Actual QREs for 2024 (activities meeting EoU standard) | $2,100,000 |
| Base Period QREs (B) | Average of 2022 and 2023: $(\$900,000 + \$1,300,000) / 2$ | $1,100,000 |
| Increase in QREs (A – B) | $\$2,100,000 – \$1,100,000$ | $1,000,000 |
| Total Colorado Credit Generated | $\$1,000,000 \times 3\%$ | $30,000 |
| Annual Claim Limit (25%) | $\$30,000 \times 0.25$ | $7,500 |
| Indefinite Carryforward | $\$30,000 – \$7,500$ | $22,500 |
Summit Robotics must ensure that it secured pre-certification from the Colorado Springs EZ Administrator and files Form DR 1366 to claim the $\$7,500$ allowable credit for 2024. The remaining $\$22,500$ is carried forward indefinitely, sustained by the rigorous documentation proving the Elimination of Uncertainty in the 2024 QRA.14
Are you eligible?
Why choose us?
Pass an Audit?
What is the R&D Tax Credit?
The Research & Experimentation Tax Credit (or R&D Tax Credit), is a general business tax credit under Internal Revenue Code section 41 for companies that incur research and development (R&D) costs in the United States. The credits are a tax incentive for performing qualified research in the United States, resulting in a credit to a tax return. For the first three years of R&D claims, 6% of the total qualified research expenses (QRE) form the gross credit. In the 4th year of claims and beyond, a base amount is calculated, and an adjusted expense line is multiplied times 14%. Click here to learn more.
Never miss a deadline again
Stay up to date on IRS processes
Discover R&D in your industry
R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services
Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.
If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.
R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services
creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.
Our Fees
Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/
Choose your state
