The Intersection of Federal R&E Amortization (IRC $\S 174$) and the Colorado Enterprise Zone R&D Tax Credit

I. Executive Summary: The Federal Mandate and State Implications

Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 174 mandates that expenditures for research and experimentation (R&E) must be capitalized and amortized over a specific period, thereby eliminating the immediate tax deduction previously available to R&D-performing businesses.1 This federal change fundamentally increases a company’s federal taxable income, which, due to Colorado’s tax conformity rules, directly raises the state tax base and subsequent income tax liability.

This report details the operational consequences of the federal capitalization rule on Colorado taxpayers, establishes the necessary link between IRC $\S 174$ costs and the state’s research credit eligibility, and outlines the precise calculation and administrative requirements established by the Colorado Department of Revenue (CDOR) and the Office of Economic Development and International Trade (OEDIT). The central finding is that, in the absence of specific state decoupling legislation, the federal capitalization rule significantly increases the Colorado state tax obligation. Consequently, the specialized, incremental, and non-refundable Colorado R&D credit is now a far more critical financial planning tool used to offset this new, higher state income tax burden.

1.1. IRC $\S 174$: A Two-Line Definition

IRC Section 174 mandates that all research and experimentation (R&E) expenditures be capitalized and amortized over a specific period, thereby eliminating the immediate tax deduction previously available to R&D-performing businesses.1 This federal change significantly increases taxable income, directly impacting Colorado companies operating under the state’s conformity laws while potentially still qualifying for the incremental state R&D credit.

1.2. Report Objectives and Key Findings

The objective of this analysis is to provide a comprehensive guide for corporate tax directors and financial executives in Colorado, bridging the substantial gap created by the post-2021 federal R&E capitalization requirements and the restrictive, location-dependent rules governing the Colorado Enterprise Zone (EZ) R&D Tax Credit.

The federal requirement to capitalize R&E costs, which creates higher Federal Taxable Income (FTI), flows directly into the state tax base due to Colorado’s system of rolling conformity.3 This unintended consequence—higher state tax liability—transforms the previously supplemental, non-refundable Colorado R&D credit into a crucial mechanism for mitigating the unexpected state tax burden.4 For companies suddenly facing substantial state tax obligations, the ability to utilize this credit for liability offset has become paramount.

1.3. Summary of Recommendations

The analysis indicates that businesses must pursue a coordinated tax strategy that integrates federal amortization tracking with stringent, location-specific documentation of research costs. Recommendations include:

1. Maintaining dual tracking mechanisms to satisfy both the federal five-year amortization requirement (IRC $\S 174$) and the location-specific Enterprise Zone Qualified Research Expense (QRE) requirement (Colorado EZ Credit).
2. Aggressively documenting and allocating R&D activities, especially payroll and supply costs, to designated Enterprise Zones to maximize the incremental state credit.4
3. Closely monitoring legislative developments related to IRC $\S 174\text{A}$, as potential federal restoration of expensing could trigger a need for retroactive state amended returns to claim refunds on previously overpaid state taxes.6

II. Federal Tax Landscape: Deconstructing IRC Section 174

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017 delivered one of the most significant changes to R&D accounting in decades by modifying IRC $\S 174$. This modification shifted the treatment of specified research or experimental (SRE) expenditures from optional immediate expensing to mandatory capitalization and amortization.2

2.1. Historical Context: Immediate Expensing Pre-2022

Historically, prior to tax years beginning after December 31, 2021, businesses could deduct the total amount of R&D expenditures as an expense in the year incurred.2 This long-standing policy provided a powerful incentive for corporate tax planning, allowing businesses, particularly those in R&D-heavy industries like software and life sciences, to minimize or eliminate taxable income during the development phase.10

2.2. The TCJA Transformation: Mandatory Capitalization

Beginning for tax years starting after December 31, 2021, the option to expense R&E costs was eliminated. Instead, the TCJA mandated that all SRE expenditures must be capitalized and amortized.2

2.2.1. Amortization Periods

The amortization period depends entirely on the location where the research is performed.1

• R&E performed within the United States must be capitalized and amortized ratably over five years.1
• R&E performed outside the United States (including Puerto Rico or any U.S. possession) must be capitalized and amortized over 15 years.1

Amortization begins at the midpoint of the taxable year in which the expenses are paid or incurred.9 For example, if a company incurs $5 million in domestic R&E expenses in 2022, it is only permitted to deduct $500,000 in that year ($5 million / 5 years * 50%), with the remaining deduction spread over the subsequent five and a half years.9

2.2.2. Treatment of Software Development

The statute explicitly includes a provision governing software development, stating that any amount paid or incurred in connection with the development of software must be treated as a research or experimental expenditure subject to capitalization.1 This inclusion is particularly impactful for Colorado’s technology sector.

The capitalization of software development costs severely affects technology and startup firms in Colorado. These innovation-driven companies incur massive upfront R&E costs.10 The pre-2022 rules allowed these expenses to be deducted immediately, often resulting in Net Operating Losses (NOLs). Post-2022, capitalizing these costs forces companies, even those that are pre-revenue, to report substantially higher Federal Taxable Income (FTI).8 This creation of “phantom income,” where companies incur tax liabilities without corresponding operating profits, places extreme pressure on cash flow and is a major financial risk for R&D-intensive companies in the state.9

2.3. Defining Specified Research or Experimental (SRE) Expenditures

SRE expenditures encompass costs for or incident to research and experimentation activities.12 A key definition provided by administrative guidance (e.g., IRS Notice 2023-63) details SRE activities as:

1. Software development activities, including planning, designing, building models/prototypes, writing source code, and testing up to the placed-in-service date or production of product masters.12
2. Activities conducted in the experimental or laboratory sense intended to discover information that would eliminate uncertainty concerning the development, improvement, or appropriate design of a product, component, or subcomponent.12

2.4. Nuanced Rules: Disposition and Abandonment

A critical and often counterintuitive rule is the mandatory continuance of amortization. The R&E expenditures must continue to be amortized over the required 5- or 15-year period even in instances where the taxpayer retires, abandons, or disposes of the property related to the research.1

This rule prevents the immediate recovery of the unamortized basis upon project failure or disposition.12 This continuation of amortization heightens the financial risk associated with R&D, as companies are still required to recognize taxable income related to a failed or abandoned project, which, in turn, contributes to a higher tax base for Colorado tax purposes.

2.5. Future Legislation Watch: The Potential Return to Expensing (IRC $\S 174\text{A}$)

The mandatory capitalization rules have been widely criticized, leading to substantial political pressure for repeal or delay. Recent legislative proposals, such as the proposed “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (OBBBA), seek to reinstate or temporarily suspend the amortization requirement for domestic R&E expenditures.2

If enacted, new IRC $\S 174\text{A}$ could allow full expensing for domestic R&E beginning in tax years after December 31, 2024. Furthermore, such legislation may include transition rules permitting taxpayers to deduct unamortized domestic R&E expenditures paid or incurred during the 2022–2024 period.6 This legislative flux necessitates careful ongoing tax planning, especially concerning state conformity and potential retroactive adjustments.

The table below summarizes the dramatic shift in the federal treatment of R&E costs:

Table: Comparative Treatment of R&E Expenditures (IRC $\S 174$)

III. The Gateway to Credit: IRC $\S 174$ as the “Section 41 Test”

For a cost to be considered for the Colorado R&D tax credit, it must first satisfy the fundamental criteria established under federal law. The determination of Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) under IRC $\S 41$ relies fundamentally on the underlying expense satisfying the requirements of IRC $\S 174$.14

3.1. IRC $\S 41$: Qualified Research Expenses (QREs)

The connection between the capitalization rules of $\S 174$ and the credit rules of $\S 41$ is formal and foundational. An expenditure must first qualify as an R&E cost under $\S 174$ before it can be considered a QRE under $\S 41$.14 This is universally known as the “Section 174 Test”.14

It is important to note that $\S 41$ is significantly more restrictive than $\S 174$. Costs allowable under $\S 174$ often do not meet the additional requirements of $\S 41$. For example, while patent procurement expenses generally qualify under $\S 174$, they are expressly excluded from the definition of QREs under $\S 41$.14

3.2. The Four-Part Statutory Test for Qualified Research Activities (QRAs)

Colorado’s credit eligibility aligns with the federal standards for qualified research activities (QRAs).4 To be considered “qualified research,” an activity must satisfy all four criteria outlined in $\S 41(\text{d})$ 15:

1. Technological in Nature: The research must fundamentally rely on the principles of physical or biological science, engineering, or computer science.5
2. Permitted Purpose / Business Component Test: The activity must be undertaken to develop or improve the functionality, performance, reliability, or quality of a new or existing business component (e.g., product, process, technique, software, or invention).15
3. Elimination of Uncertainty: The activity must seek to discover information that would eliminate technical uncertainties regarding the appropriate design, capability, or method of development of the business component.5
4. Process of Experimentation: The research must utilize a systematic process of experimentation, which includes testing, modeling, simulation, and systematic trial and error to evaluate alternatives.5

3.3. Qualified Research Expenses (QRE Categories)

QREs that can generate the credit fall into three primary categories 4:

• Wages: Salaries paid to employees who directly perform, supervise, or directly support qualified research activities.
• Supplies: Costs of materials and raw materials consumed in the design, fabrication, or testing process that are not capitalized or depreciated.
• Contract Research: 65% of amounts paid to third parties for qualified research conducted on behalf of the taxpayer, provided the taxpayer retains the economic risk of the research.4

3.4. Administrative Efficiency Created by Capitalization

While the mandatory capitalization under $\S 174$ increases the tax burden, it concurrently yields an important administrative benefit for claiming the R&D credit. Prior to 2022, many companies simply deducted R&E costs as general operating expenses and only separated QREs during the $\S 41$ credit calculation process.9 The current mandatory capitalization regime requires businesses to precisely track and allocate R&E costs to specific 5-year and 15-year amortization schedules for federal compliance.12

This increased regulatory rigor surrounding $\S 174$ necessitates highly granular documentation (including detailed general ledgers, project notes, and payroll records).5 This detailed data gathering for federal amortization inadvertently creates a far more robust and auditable foundation for substantiating the specific Enterprise Zone QREs required for the Colorado state credit.

IV. Colorado State Conformity and the Amortization Effect

The critical link between the federal mandate and the state credit is Colorado’s approach to incorporating the Internal Revenue Code into its tax statutes.

4.1. Colorado’s Adoption of Federal Tax Law

Colorado operates under a system of rolling conformity to the IRC.3 This means that in the absence of specific legislative action to decouple from federal changes, alterations to the IRC—including those that affect the calculation of Federal Taxable Income (FTI)—are immediately adopted into Colorado tax law.3

4.2. CDOR Guidance on $\S 174$: Default Conformity

The Colorado Department of Revenue (CDOR) has not issued broad guidance or enacted specific legislation designed to decouple from the TCJA’s $\S 174$ capitalization requirement.

The state legislature has demonstrated its capacity to decouple from federal provisions when necessary to mitigate revenue impacts, as evidenced by the partial decoupling from the IRC $\S 199\text{A}$ Qualified Business Income (QBI) deduction.3 The absence of similar decoupling action for $\S 174$ confirms that, for state income tax purposes in tax years beginning after 2021, Colorado adheres to the federal capitalization and amortization rules. This acceptance of the federal definition of FTI is critical because it means Colorado taxpayers must calculate their state income tax liability using the reduced R&E deduction allowed under the five- or 15-year amortization schedule.

4.3. State-Level Financial Shock: Increased Taxable Income

The increase in FTI caused by the mandatory $\S 174$ capitalization flows directly through to the state tax base.13 For R&D-intensive companies, this mandatory amortization results in substantially higher Colorado taxable income than was anticipated under the previous expensing regime.9

This increased state tax liability is particularly acute for flow-through entities (S corporations, partnerships, and LLCs). For these entities, the higher taxable income flows through directly to the owners or shareholders, increasing their individual Colorado income tax liability.4 Since Colorado does not offer a state adjustment mechanism (such as an add-back or subtraction) to restore immediate R&E expensing, the state R&D tax credit becomes one of the few available tools to mitigate the resulting tax increase.

4.4. Precedent for Retroactive Changes

The interplay between state conformity and dynamic federal legislation requires constant vigilance. Colorado judicial precedent offers a potential path for relief should Congress pass legislation that retroactively repeals or delays the $\S 174$ capitalization rule. In one case, the Colorado Court of Appeals held that taxpayers could file an amended state individual income tax return claiming a refund based on a retroactive amendment to the IRC (specifically regarding the CARES Act’s suspension of the excess business loss deduction).17

If future federal legislation reinstates full expensing retroactively for the 2022–2024 period, Colorado taxpayers would likely be permitted to amend their state returns to reflect the resulting lower FTI.7

V. The Colorado R&D Tax Credit: Enterprise Zone Specifics

The Colorado R&D credit is unique among state R&D incentives because its application is strictly tied to activities conducted within designated geographic areas and is subject to restrictive utilization rules.

5.1. Enterprise Zone (EZ) Requirement

The primary limiting factor for the Colorado credit is that it is available only for Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) incurred within one of the state’s designated Enterprise Zones (EZs).4 These 16 designated zones are economically distressed areas identified based on criteria such as unemployment rates, population growth, and per capita income.18

5.1.1. Pre-Certification and Eligibility

To claim the credit, businesses must pre-certify their activities with the local Enterprise Zone Administrator.4 Furthermore, eligibility can be impacted by duration: a business generally needs to be located in the same EZ for three years to claim the credit; relocating to a different EZ restarts this three-year window.18 Businesses operating in the marijuana industry are statutorily ineligible.18

This requirement for location-specific research expenses introduces a critical allocation complexity. R&D-intensive firms must rigorously distinguish, using highly detailed records, between R&E activities performed within the EZ boundaries and those performed outside. Only the QREs accurately attributed to the EZ location contribute to the credit calculation.4 Strategic planning, therefore, must involve prioritizing the location of R&D activities—including employee wages, supplies procurement, and research facilities—inside the certified EZ boundaries to maximize the credit base.

5.2. Calculation Methodology: The 3% Incremental Credit

Colorado utilizes a regular incremental method for determining the credit amount, comparing current QREs to a two-year historical average base.4

The credit is calculated as follows:

1. Base Amount: The base is the average of the EZ-specific QREs from the preceding two tax years (Year -1 and Year -2).4 If a business had no research or experimental expenditures in one or both preceding years, a value of zero is used in the average calculation.18
2. Incremental Increase: The excess QREs are computed by subtracting the two-year base amount from the current year’s EZ QREs.4
3. Credit Rate: The total calculated credit is 3% of this positive incremental increase.16

5.3. Credit Utilization and Carryforward Limitations

The Colorado R&D credit is subject to strict rules governing its use, which further emphasizes the need for long-term tax planning.

5.3.1. Non-Refundable Status and Installment Claim

The credit is non-refundable; it can only be applied against the taxpayer’s Colorado income tax liability.4 A critical utilization constraint is the annual claim restriction: the total credit generated in a tax year must be claimed in four equal annual installments of 25% each.4 This 25% annual installment rule results in a delayed cash flow benefit, requiring businesses to stretch the use of a single year’s credit generation across four subsequent tax periods. This delayed benefit must be factored into cash flow models, especially given the increased liability from $\S 174$ amortization.

5.3.2. Carryforward Provisions

To the extent that the 25% installment amount for any year exceeds the tax liability after other credits have been claimed, the excess may be carried forward.16 Sources suggest conflicting carryforward periods: some indicate unused credits may be carried forward for up to 12 income tax years 22, while others state there is no limit on the number of years a business may carry forward the credit.18 Taxpayers must consult the most current CDOR guidance or statutory language to confirm the applicable carryforward period.

The mechanisms detailed in this section are summarized in the following table:

Table: Colorado Enterprise Zone R&D Credit Calculation Mechanism

VI. Compliance and Documentation Requirements (CDOR Focus)

Claiming the Colorado R&D tax credit requires mandatory compliance steps that span both the Office of Economic Development and International Trade (OEDIT) and the CDOR Taxation Division.

6.1. Role of the Office of Economic Development and International Trade (OEDIT)

OEDIT is responsible for administering the Enterprise Zone Program, including designating the 16 EZs across the state.18 Local EZ administrators manage their respective zones and are responsible for the mandatory pre-certification process that confirms a business’s eligibility and location within the zone prior to the credit being claimed.4

Compliance requires a dual-path verification process: technical satisfaction of the IRC $\S 174$/$\S 41$ rules, and mandatory administrative compliance with the EZ program. Failure at the procedural level, such as failing to pre-certify with the local EZ administrator, can invalidate the credit claim regardless of the technical accuracy of the QRE calculation.

6.2. Key Colorado Tax Forms and Schedules

The CDOR utilizes specific forms for reporting and utilizing Enterprise Zone credits:

• Form DR 1366, Enterprise Zone Credits Schedule: This is the primary schedule used by taxpayers to calculate and claim EZ credits, including the R&D credit, when the taxpayer was not issued a refund certificate by OEDIT.23 This form is essential for tracking the total credit available, the 25% installment claimed in the current year, and any resulting carryforward amounts.24
• Form DR 1370: This form is used only if the taxpayer was issued a refund certificate by OEDIT for their credits.24

6.3. Required Documentation for QREs

Rigorous documentation is necessary to substantiate QREs, proving that expenses meet the federal four-part test and were incurred solely within the EZ. The required records include 5:

• General ledger detail showing expense classification and payment.
• Payroll records supporting wages paid to employees engaged in qualified activities.
• Project notes, lab results, and design documentation.
• Emails and other business communications that track the systematic process of experimentation.

6.4. CDOR Reporting and Data Insights (Statistics)

The CDOR’s Office of Research and Analysis (ORA) compiles aggregated data on Colorado income tax credits claimed by both individuals and C corporations.25 These reports provide summary data, including the number of credits claimed, total amounts claimed, and average amounts claimed.26 However, the ORA is legally restricted from providing company-specific utilization data due to Colorado Revised Statute $\S 39-21-113\text{ (4)(a)}$, which mandates taxpayer confidentiality.25 Consequently, tax professionals must rely on aggregated reports to gauge utilization trends within the state.

The key compliance elements are summarized below:

Table: Key Colorado Forms and Utilization Rules

VII. Case Study: Maximizing the Colorado R&D Credit Post-IRC 174 Capitalization

To illustrate the interaction between federal capitalization and the incremental state credit, consider a profitable R&D company operating in a Colorado Enterprise Zone.

7.1. Scenario Definition: Alpine Tech Solutions (ATS)

Alpine Tech Solutions (ATS) is a profitable C-Corporation specializing in software development, located entirely within a designated Denver Enterprise Zone. The company’s R&E expenditures meet the IRC $\S 41$ four-part test for qualified research.

Financial Data (Domestic EZ QREs):

• Year -2 (2022): EZ QREs = $800,000
• Year -1 (2023): EZ QREs = $1,200,000
• Current Year (Year 0, 2024): EZ QREs = $1,500,000
• Estimated Colorado Tax Liability (Before Credits, reflecting $\S 174$ amortization impact) = $50,000.

7.2. Federal Tax Impact Analysis

Under pre-TCJA rules, ATS could have immediately deducted the entire $1.5 million in QREs for 2024. However, due to the mandatory capitalization under $\S 174$, ATS can only deduct the amortized portion of its $1.5 million expenditure. Utilizing the five-year amortization period with the midpoint convention, the deduction for 2024 is $150,000 ($1,500,000 / 5 years $\times$ 50%).9

The resulting $1.35 million difference in allowable deduction (immediate expensing versus amortization) contributes directly to higher FTI, and by extension, the company’s Colorado state tax liability of $50,000. This increased state liability underscores the necessity of utilizing the Colorado R&D credit, which, although small and subject to installment limits, is crucial for mitigating the tax burden created by federal conformity.

7.3. Step-by-Step Colorado Credit Calculation

The calculation for the 2024 Colorado R&D credit follows the statutory 3% incremental method based solely on the Enterprise Zone QREs.4

7.4. Utilization Strategy and Carryforward

ATS generates a total Colorado R&D tax credit of $15,000 for 2024. Due to the 25% annual claim limit 21, ATS can only utilize $3,750 of the credit against its 2024 Colorado tax liability of $50,000.

2024 Tax Impact:

• Initial Colorado Tax Liability: $50,000
• 2024 Credit Claimed: $3,750
• Remaining Colorado Tax Liability: $46,250

The remaining credit balance of $11,250 ($15,000 – $3,750) must be carried forward. ATS must claim the remaining three installments of $3,750 in 2025, 2026, and 2027. This demonstrates how the credit, despite its low rate, is essential for mitigating the elevated state tax exposure resulting from the federal $\S 174$ mandate, requiring multi-year tracking using Form DR 1366.24

VIII. Conclusion and Strategic Planning

8.1. Integrated Federal and State Tax Planning

The post-TCJA era demands a highly integrated approach to R&D tax planning for Colorado businesses. The state’s rolling conformity ensures that the mandatory federal capitalization of R&E expenditures immediately translates into a higher Colorado tax base, subjecting R&D-intensive companies, particularly startups and software developers, to unanticipated tax liabilities.9

Strategic success relies on maintaining two distinct, rigorous data trails:

1. Federal Amortization: Precise tracking and allocation of R&E costs across 5-year and 15-year schedules, including strict adherence to rules regarding software development and project abandonment.1
2. Colorado EZ QREs: Detailed documentation proving that the QREs (wages, supplies, contract research) satisfy the $\S 41$ four-part test and were incurred strictly within the boundaries of a pre-certified Enterprise Zone.4

Given the non-refundable nature of the state credit, its primary utility is offsetting the increased tax liability caused by federal conformity. Therefore, maximizing the concentration of qualified research activities within the EZ boundaries should be a high priority for corporate tax strategy.

8.2. Continuous Monitoring of Legislative Action

Businesses in Colorado must closely monitor the progress of federal legislative attempts, such as the proposed IRC $\S 174\text{A}$ (OBBBA), which could restore immediate expensing for domestic R&E costs.6 If this legislation is passed retroactively (potentially covering 2022–2024), taxpayers should be prepared to file amended Colorado state returns to capture the resulting reduction in FTI, relying on established state judicial precedent for retroactive IRC changes.7 This requires readiness to coordinate the amended federal deduction with the associated implications for the $\S 280\text{C}(\text{c})$ reduction.7

8.3. Final Conclusion: Navigating Complexity for Innovation

The tax landscape for R&D in Colorado has been dramatically complicated by the federal shift to mandatory capitalization. Colorado’s conformity rules transmit the federal tax burden increase directly to the state level. While the state offers the Enterprise Zone R&D credit—a 3% incremental, installment-based mechanism—it is geographically restricted and subject to rigorous utilization limits. By proactively integrating federal $\S 174$ amortization compliance with stringent Enterprise Zone administrative requirements (including pre-certification and location-specific QRE tracking), Colorado businesses can effectively manage the increased tax exposure and realize essential benefits that reward their investment in innovation.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/