The “Technological in Nature” Requirement: Navigating Colorado R&D Tax Credit Compliance

The “Technological in Nature” test ensures that claimed research activities rely fundamentally on principles of hard sciences—such as physics, chemistry, biological sciences, engineering, or computer science—rather than routine business or social science efforts. This requirement serves as a gatekeeper, confirming that qualified expenses under the Colorado Enterprise Zone Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credit are genuinely tied to scientific or technical discovery efforts.1

The Colorado R&D Tax Credit is a critical, long-term incentive designed to promote innovation and investment for businesses operating within designated Enterprise Zones (EZs).3 Eligibility for this state credit is entirely dependent upon satisfying the rigorous federal Qualified Research Activity (QRA) standards outlined in Internal Revenue Code (IRC) §41.3 The “Technological in Nature” prong is one of the four mandatory criteria within this framework, requiring taxpayers to demonstrate a fundamental reliance on scientific or technical discipline during their research efforts.5

The structure of the Colorado credit—which is tied strictly to EZ activity, offers a 3% incremental rate, and restricts annual usage to 25% of the total credit with an indefinite carryforward—mandates a long-term strategic approach to compliance and documentation.3 Since the tax benefit accrues slowly over many years, the initial documentation confirming that the research is “Technological in Nature” must be robust and indisputable. A failure to rigorously satisfy this technical test in the initial claim year can jeopardize the tax asset for numerous subsequent years, significantly elevating the risk profile associated with inadequately documented claims. Therefore, taxpayers must focus on scientifically linking their expenditures to the discovery of information intended to resolve technical uncertainty.

Regulatory Foundation: The Federal Nexus (IRC §41)

The Colorado Enterprise Zone R&D Tax Credit is codified in the Colorado Revised Statutes (CRS) and structurally relies entirely on the federal definition of Qualified Research Expenditures (QREs) found in IRC §41.3 This explicit adoption requires Colorado taxpayers to meet the demanding standards established by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the courts regarding what constitutes “qualified research.”

The Four-Part Test Framework

For activities to be considered “Qualified Research” and for the associated expenditures to qualify for the credit, they must satisfy four concurrent requirements, often referred to as the four-part test 5:

1. Permitted Purpose: The research must aim to develop or improve the functionality, performance, reliability, or quality of a new or existing business component (which includes any product, process, software, technique, formula, or invention).5
2. Elimination of Uncertainty: The activity must seek to discover information that would eliminate technical uncertainties regarding the appropriate design, capability, or method of development of the business component.5
3. Process of Experimentation: A systematic process must be undertaken to evaluate alternatives to achieve the desired result, where that result or method was uncertain at the outset.1
4. Technological in Nature: The research must fundamentally rely on principles of hard science.6

Under IRC §41(d), the scope of research is explicitly defined as activities undertaken for the purpose of discovering information which is technological in nature, where the application of that information is intended to develop a new or improved business component.8

It is important to note that the taxpayer’s intent to apply the discovered information to develop an improved business component constitutes the standard for qualification, rather than the ultimate achievement of commercial success.8 This compliance advantage means that research activities which result in a failed prototype or an abandoned methodological approach can still qualify as research, provided the activities themselves were systematically designed to eliminate technical uncertainty and relied on hard sciences. This regulatory approach is designed to encourage genuine, risk-taking innovation, allowing businesses to claim expenses associated with unsuccessful research attempts. Therefore, documentation should meticulously record research failures, confirming that the effort was scientifically rigorous and aimed at technical discovery.

Deep Dive: Decoding the “Technological in Nature” Requirement

The “Technological in Nature” prong is a critical filter that ensures claimed research activities are rooted in scientific discipline.

The Hard Science Mandate

This criterion strictly requires that the process of experimentation used to discover information must fundamentally rely on the principles of hard science.1 Qualifying disciplines include physical sciences, biological sciences, chemistry, engineering, and computer science.1

Activities based on subjective criteria or disciplines outside of the hard sciences are explicitly excluded. For example, research focused on the social sciences (such as economics or market research), the arts, humanities, or standard management functions cannot qualify for the credit.9 This distinction ensures that the activity represents “research and development costs in the experimental or laboratory sense,” as emphasized in federal guidance referenced by state authorities.10

Distinguishing Technical Reliance from Routine Practice

The test necessitates that the activities move beyond the routine application of existing knowledge and into the realm of discovery. Simply employing personnel with technical titles, such as engineers or chemists, is insufficient if their work involves calculating known variables using standard industry formulas.

The determination of eligibility rests on whether the research relies on systematic scientific methodology to resolve a technical uncertainty.8 For instance, an engineer developing a novel, unproven algorithm to model complex environmental interactions relies on computer science and engineering principles in a manner that constitutes “Technological in Nature.” Conversely, using a well-established software package to perform standard calculations on known structural loads is generally considered routine practice and would not satisfy the requirement.

The Interplay with Experimentation

The technological nature of the research is intrinsically linked to the Process of Experimentation. The systematic evaluation—whether through trial-and-error, modeling, testing, or simulation 1—must be driven by and documented through scientific principles.1

The requirement that the research must rely on “hard science” principles acts as a filter against many corporate activities, particularly in software development or manufacturing efficiency. If the uncertainty concerns human factors (e.g., preferred user interface design) or logistical improvements derived from management changes, the “Technological in Nature” test fails because it relies on social science or industrial organization principles, not hard science.9 Therefore, for software developers, qualifying activities must focus on the underlying algorithms, data structures, or engineering integration challenges (computer science) and necessitate isolating the “back-end” engineering QREs from “front-end” development costs.

Colorado State Revenue Guidance and Administration

Colorado’s administration of the R&D credit, though based on federal criteria, imposes specific jurisdictional and administrative requirements that taxpayers must satisfy to claim the Enterprise Zone (EZ) credit.

CRS Alignment and Enterprise Zone Mandate

The state credit encourages innovation by offsetting Colorado state income tax liability.3 This incentive is geographically constrained: Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) must be conducted and incurred within one of the 16 designated Colorado Enterprise Zones.4

The eligible expenditures in Colorado mirror the federal definition of QREs.3 These include wages for employees performing, supervising, or directly supporting qualified research (excluding fringe benefits); costs for supplies and materials consumed in the research process; and costs for the right to use computers utilized in research.3 Contract research expenses also qualify, provided the third-party research is performed within the Enterprise Zone.3

CDOR Interpretation of the Technical Test

The Colorado Department of Revenue (CDOR) and the Office of Economic Development and International Trade (OEDIT) rely on the foundational federal standards for defining qualified research. There is no separate, exhaustive regulatory guidance from the state that redefines the “Technological in Nature” prong outside of the IRC §41 framework.10

Guidance provided by the CDOR confirms that eligible expenditures must be incurred in connection with the taxpayer’s trade or business and represent R&D costs in the experimental or laboratory sense.10 This state focus confirms the adoption of the federal standard that the nature of the activity (scientifically systematic) is key, rather than the level of technological advancement achieved.8 Furthermore, the CDOR guidance mirrors the federal requirement that the research must intend to discover information that would eliminate uncertainty concerning the capability, method, or appropriate design of the product.10

Administrative Requirements and Compliance Forms

Compliance with the EZ program requires several crucial administrative steps:

• Pre-certification: Taxpayers must obtain pre-certification from their local EZ administrator before claiming the credit.3
• Filing Requirements: The credit is claimed on the Colorado income tax return using specific forms. Taxpayers must complete and submit Colorado Department of Revenue Form DR 1366 and the EZ Tax Credit Certificates.4 Partnerships claiming the credit must also complete and submit Form DR 0078a for the distribution of credits to owners.4
• Record Retention: Taxpayers must retain adequate documentation and records for a period of four years for state audit purposes.3

The strict Enterprise Zone requirement combined with the federal QRE definition creates a specific, complex compliance burden for multi-state or multi-site Colorado companies. If personnel or contract researchers perform qualifying work both inside and outside the EZ, those expenses must be precisely allocated to ensure that non-EZ QREs are excluded from the state credit base.3 This necessitates implementing robust time-tracking and expense allocation systems dedicated solely to EZ boundaries, imposing an added layer of administrative complexity to the technical requirement of proving “Technological in Nature.”

Table 1: Colorado Enterprise Zone R&D Credit Mechanics

The Complete 4-Part Test: A Synergistic Requirement

The “Technological in Nature” prong acts as the technical underpinning for the other three requirements. All four elements must be present and documented simultaneously for an expense to qualify.

Permitted Purpose

This test defines the what of the research. The R&D activity must aim to develop or improve a measurable characteristic of a business component, such as functionality or quality.2 The improvement must relate directly to the technological characteristics of the component, confirming that the purpose aligns with a scientific goal.

Elimination of Uncertainty

This test defines the why of the research. The uncertainty must be technical—meaning the answer is not readily available or deducible from existing knowledge.10 If the solution requires the application of hard science principles to resolve a technical capability or design hurdle, the activity satisfies this prong. Uncertainty related solely to cost, management efficiency, or market acceptance is insufficient.

Process of Experimentation

This test defines the how of the research. The methodology must involve a systematic process of inquiry, including testing, modeling, simulating, and systematic trial and error.1 This systematic process itself must rely fundamentally on scientific or engineering principles to design, execute, and analyze the results of the evaluation.1

Table 2: Defining the Technological Nexus: The Four-Part Test

Exclusions from Qualified Research (IRC §41 and State Implications)

Colorado implicitly adopts the standard federal exclusions, which provide essential boundaries for research activities:

• Research After Commercial Production: Research conducted after the beginning of commercial production is generally excluded.9 This classification applies because once production begins, the underlying technical uncertainty is presumed to be resolved, and subsequent work is typically routine maintenance or quality control.
• Adaptation of Existing Business Components: Research related to adapting an existing component to meet a specific customer’s requirement or need is excluded, as this is typically application engineering rather than technical discovery.9
• Duplication of Existing Business Components: Activities related to simply copying a component.9
• Social Sciences, Arts, etc.: Research in the social sciences, arts, or humanities is explicitly excluded, reinforcing the “hard science” mandate.9
• Funded Research: Research to the extent funded by a third party.9
• Foreign Research: Research conducted outside the United States is disallowed.9 This exclusion is compounded by the Colorado requirement that research must specifically occur within the designated Enterprise Zone (EZ).3

Case Study: Applying “Technological in Nature” in Colorado EZ

This example demonstrates how a firm documents the technological nature of its research while meeting the unique geographic constraints of the Colorado credit.

Scenario: EcoBridge Engineering

EcoBridge Engineering, an EZ-based Denver firm, is developing a Self-Healing Concrete (SHC) formula optimized for the freeze-thaw cycles prevalent in Colorado. The project involves utilizing Chemistry and Materials Engineering principles to determine the optimal chemical composition and bacterial ratios required to reliably repair micro-cracks in concrete under dynamic temperature loads.

The documentation of the use of advanced engineering and scientific tools (FEA, ultrasonic testing) explicitly proves that the methodology relies on hard science, distinguishing the activity from routine construction quality assurance.

Colorado State Credit Calculation

All wages and contract research expenses for the project were tracked and confirmed as being incurred within the designated Enterprise Zone.4 Assuming the following figures:

• QREs (Current Year 2026): $1,200,000
• Average QREs (Prior 2 Years): $875,000
• Excess QREs (Current – Average): $325,000

The calculation yields a total Colorado credit of 3% of the excess QREs:

$$0.03 \times \$325,000 = \$9,750$$

The maximum credit claimable in 2026 is limited to 25% of the total credit 3:

$$0.25 \times \$9,750 = \$2,437.50$$

The remaining $7,312.50 is carried forward indefinitely, subject to the 25% annual usage limit in subsequent years.3

Conclusion and Strategic Compliance Recommendations

For Colorado businesses, satisfying the “Technological in Nature” requirement of IRC §41 is the most critical hurdle for QRA eligibility. This necessitates documentation that explicitly links activities to principles of physical science, biological science, chemistry, engineering, or computer science.

The Colorado R&D credit imposes a specialized dual compliance mandate: Technical fidelity to the four-part test and rigorous administrative segregation of QREs based on geographic location. The need for precise geographic data segregation (Enterprise Zone boundaries) on top of the already demanding federal standards for technical documentation creates substantial administrative complexity that must be managed strategically.

Given the nonrefundable nature of the credit, the low 3% incremental rate, and the 25% annual usage cap, the Colorado credit is inherently a long-term tax asset. This requires taxpayers to adopt meticulous, multi-year record-keeping. Strategic compliance dictates that businesses utilize integrated project management and accounting systems that simultaneously track technical uncertainty, experimental methodology, and the geographical location of all QREs. This level of detail is necessary to withstand audits across the extended carryforward period and maximize the value of the incentive.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/