The Colorado Enterprise Zone Research and Development Tax Credit: Navigating the Three-Year Presence Requirement

I. Executive Summary: Defining the Three-Year EZ Presence Requirement

The Colorado Enterprise Zone (EZ) Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credit is designed to incentivize innovation within the state’s economically distressed areas. A foundational requirement for claiming this incentive is the Three-Year EZ Presence Requirement:

• To claim the Colorado Enterprise Zone (EZ) Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credit, a business facility must maintain continuous physical presence in the same designated Enterprise Zone for a minimum of three consecutive years.1
• Relocating the R&D facility to a different Enterprise Zone resets this three-year clock, delaying eligibility for the R&D credit until the new three-year residency period is satisfied.1

I.B. Nuanced Context and Legislative Intent

The Colorado EZ Program, managed jointly by the Office of Economic Development and International Trade (OEDIT) and the Colorado Department of Revenue (CDOR), aims to foster development in 16 designated enterprise zones characterized by high unemployment rates, low per capita income, or slow population growth.1 The R&D credit specifically targets high-value economic activity, providing a state income tax credit equal to 3% of the increase in Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) compared to a two-year historical average.1

The establishment of the three-year presence requirement ensures that the R&D credit is reserved for businesses demonstrating a substantial, long-term commitment to the distressed community. By demanding sustained residency, the state seeks to anchor high-quality, innovative activity—which generates intellectual property and attracts outside dollars—within the designated zones, promoting durable economic revitalization.2 The stringent penalty for movement, which results in the entire eligibility timeline resetting 1, emphasizes stability over short-term tax optimization, indicating that the legislature views the R&D credit’s potential value (especially given its indefinite carryforward provision) as sufficient motivation to justify a high barrier to initial access. This structural feature is designed to filter out businesses seeking opportunistic or temporary tax savings, validating the commitment of those who achieve compliance.

II. Statutory and Regulatory Foundation: Integrating Eligibility and Calculation

Accessing the EZ R&D credit requires satisfying several interlocking requirements covering business legality, operational location, and financial calculation methodologies.

II.A. General Eligibility Requirements and Disqualifications

Eligibility requires that the business facility conducting the QREs must be physically located within a state-designated Enterprise Zone.1 Only the QREs incurred within that specific, certified EZ location are eligible for inclusion in the credit calculation.4

A critical and absolute prerequisite for claiming any EZ credit is that the business activity must be legal under both state and federal law.1 This provision notably disqualifies businesses engaged in federally prohibited activities, such as the marijuana industry, from claiming the EZ R&D tax credit.1 Furthermore, eligibility begins only after the required three-year residency period is fully satisfied.

II.B. The R&D Calculation Mechanism

The Colorado EZ R&D Tax Credit (C.R.S. § 39-30-105.5) is calculated based on the increase in Qualified Research Expenses (QREs). The credit is precisely 3% of the amount by which current-year annual R&D expenses exceed the average R&D expenses incurred during the prior two tax years.1

The base period calculation employs a two-year look-back. For businesses that had no research or experimental expenditures in one or both of the previous two income tax years, the average expenditure is calculated using zero for the year(s) without QREs.1 This methodology is highly favorable for new entrants or existing businesses that significantly ramp up their research activities after establishing operations in an Enterprise Zone.

II.C. Timeline Complexity: Reconciling Intersecting Durations

The EZ R&D credit framework introduces a unique layering of three separate temporal requirements that must be harmonized by the taxpayer: the physical location requirement, the calculation base period, and the credit utilization schedule.

Table: Colorado EZ R&D Tax Credit: Key Timeline Requirements

The interaction of these timelines creates a specific strategic incentive. A business must conduct QREs in Years 1 and 2 to establish the two-year base, but it cannot realize any tax benefit until Year 3, the first year of eligibility for filing. This structure suggests that taxpayers gain the maximum benefit by deliberately establishing a relatively low QRE base in the initial two years of EZ presence, followed by a substantial increase in QREs starting in Year 3. This approach maximizes the increase component of the calculation, ensuring that the necessary multi-year administrative and financial commitment yields the largest possible return. Taxpayers must rigorously track expenses from the start, recognizing that these initial expenditures, though not immediately credit-generating, are critical data points three years later.

III. Detailed Analysis of the Three-Year Continuous Presence

The continuous presence mandate is the defining precondition that locks a business into a long-term strategy within a specific Enterprise Zone.

III.A. The Continuous Presence Mandate and the “Reset” Clause

The requirement is unequivocal: a business must reside “in the same enterprise zone for three years to claim this credit”.1 Continuous presence is defined by the operational facility’s address being situated within the geographically designated EZ boundaries.

The most stringent aspect of this rule is the relocation consequence. If a company moves its R&D operation to a different enterprise zone, the state treats the move as a termination of the existing residency period. The entire three-year window immediately resets, and the company cannot claim the R&D credit until three consecutive years have been established in the new zone.1 This strict “reset” mechanism reinforces the state’s focus on long-term commitment and stability within the specific EZ location.

However, the guidance strictly applies the reset clause only to movement to a different EZ.1 If a business were to relocate its facility within the physical boundaries of the same designated Enterprise Zone, the continuous presence timeline should logically remain intact. To maintain compliance in such a scenario, the business must ensure that its annual OEDIT pre-certification accurately reflects the new location address without any gaps, thereby maintaining a continuous, state-certified chain of EZ presence documentation required for audit defense.

III.B. Differentiating the R&D Presence Rule

The three-year presence mandate distinguishes the EZ R&D tax credit from other incentives offered under the EZ Program. While many EZ incentives reward activity almost immediately, the R&D credit demands a specific duration of residency before the benefit can be claimed.

For example, the Enterprise Zone Investment Tax Credit (ITC) for the purchase of business personal property only requires that the property be used solely and exclusively within the EZ for at least one year.6 Similarly, the Job Training Tax Credit offers 12% of eligible costs and applies to activity in the EZ without a three-year waiting period.2 The Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance Credit is even more narrowly scoped, only applying during the first two full tax years the business is located in the EZ.6

This high-durability requirement for the R&D credit reflects its high potential value, particularly the powerful feature of its indefinite carryforward provision. Unlike most EZ credits that have carryforward limits (e.g., the New Employee Tax Credit is five years 6), the EZ R&D credit allows unused amounts to be carried forward indefinitely, limited only by future tax liability.1 The three-year prerequisite serves as a threshold designed to justify this perpetual tax asset.

IV. State Regulatory Guidance and Compliance Procedures

Compliance with the EZ R&D credit requires careful navigation of the administrative roles assigned to the Colorado Office of Economic Development and International Trade (OEDIT) and the Colorado Department of Revenue (CDOR).

IV.A. The Dual Regulatory Landscape

1. OEDIT and Local EZ Administrators: OEDIT, in conjunction with local EZ administrators, governs the eligibility determination and the certification of R&D activity.1 This body confirms that the location is within an EZ and verifies that the pre-certification and subsequent certification steps are correctly executed.1
2. CDOR: The Colorado Department of Revenue administers the actual application of the certified credit against the taxpayer’s state income tax liability.8 CDOR sets the rules for filing and credit utilization schedules.

IV.B. The Critical Role of Pre-Certification in Proving Presence

The key administrative mechanism for establishing and proving the continuous three-year presence is the annual pre-certification process, which must be completed through the OEDIT application portal.1

Pre-certification is not merely a formality; it is a mandatory legal prerequisite that must be executed in advance of the eligible R&D activity.8 Businesses must pre-certify each business location annually.1 A business can apply up to three months before the start of its tax year, or at any time during the tax year, but eligibility only covers the period certified.8

The history of consecutive, approved pre-certification records, showing the identical EZ location address for three full tax years, serves as the primary, most direct evidence that the state formally recognizes the business’s compliance with the continuous presence requirement. Therefore, the primary compliance risk is not physical relocation but administrative lapse: forgetting to renew the pre-certification before the start of the eligible tax year or failing to document the address consistently across OEDIT filings breaks the crucial three-year chain and could invalidate the subsequent credit claim.

IV.C. Filing Requirements and Documentation

After the tax year has concluded and the eligible R&D activity has been conducted, the business must complete the certification application on the OEDIT portal. Once approved by the local EZ administrator, the taxpayer receives the official OEDIT Tax Credit Certificate.1

For filing the actual income tax return, the following procedures apply:

• Electronic Filing: Any taxpayer claiming EZ credits is strongly recommended, and generally required, to file their returns electronically.10
• Documentation Submission: The taxpayer must file the Colorado income tax return and include copies of the EZ Tax Credit Certificates generated from the OEDIT system.1 Notably, this certificate replaces the older CDOR forms DR0074, DR0076, and DR0077.8
• Credit Application Forms: Taxpayers utilize the Colorado Department of Revenue form DR 1366, the “Certified Economic Development Credit Schedule,” to calculate and apply credits certified by OEDIT against their tax liability, provided they did not receive a refund certificate.8 If a refundable certificate was issued (such as for certain renewable energy investments), form DR 1370 is used instead.11
• Partnerships: Partnerships claiming the credit must also complete and submit form DR0078a for the proper distribution of credits to the partners.8

V. Evidentiary Requirements for Proving Continuous Presence

While OEDIT guidance details the required pre-certification process, it does not provide a definitive checklist of internal documentation necessary to prove the three years of continuous EZ presence in case of a state audit.8 Therefore, taxpayers must proactively establish an evidence strategy that corroborates the required residency.

V.A. Evidence Strategy: Beyond the Certificate

The OEDIT pre-certification and final certificate provide procedural compliance proof, but robust internal business records are essential to defend the underlying factual eligibility for continuous operation at the certified address. Recommended evidentiary components include:

1. OEDIT Compliance Records: Maintain a complete archive of all digital and email confirmations, application receipts, and formal approval letters for the three consecutive years of pre-certification and certification filings. This validates the administrative sequence.
2. Property Documentation: Secure uninterrupted lease agreements or deeds spanning the 36-month requirement, explicitly linking the legal entity and the physical address to the EZ location.
3. Financial and Operational Records: Provide secondary proof of continuous activity, such as utility bills (electricity, gas), insurance policies, or bank correspondence addressed to the EZ location, demonstrating active commercial presence throughout the necessary timeframe.
4. Employment Verification: Utilize payroll and human resources records, such as employee time records or W-2s, to prove that R&D employees were continuously based and operational at the EZ facility address during the three-year period. This aligns with other EZ credits, like the Job Training Credit (12% of costs), which also require employee location verification.2

V.B. Due Diligence in Location and Boundary Verification

The location must be confirmed to be within one of the 16 designated enterprise zones, which are areas defined by criteria such as unemployment rates 125% greater than the state average or per capita income below 75% of the state average.2 Businesses must use the current OEDIT interactive map to confirm their exact boundaries.1

Taxpayers must exercise enhanced due diligence in location confirmation, particularly because OEDIT is currently undergoing a process to redesignate the EZ boundaries (the current map applies to tax years prior to January 1, 2026).1 Any shift in the boundary lines that results in the R&D facility being unintentionally excluded from the EZ during the required 36-month period could retroactively terminate eligibility. Businesses must verify continuous inclusion within the EZ throughout the full residency period.

VI. Practical Application and Example Calculation

The following case study illustrates how the three-year presence rule dictates the timing of the claim while the two-year base period dictates the amount.

VI.A. Case Study: EZ Innovate Tech

Assume EZ Innovate Tech establishes its R&D facility in a qualifying Colorado Enterprise Zone on January 1, 2024 (Year 1). The company diligently completes its annual pre-certification starting in 2024.

Table 3: EZ R&D Credit Eligibility and Claim Timeline

In Year 3 (2026), EZ Innovate Tech satisfies the three-year presence requirement and is eligible to claim the credit. The credit amount is calculated as 3% of the increase in QREs compared to the average of the two preceding years (2024 and 2025), yielding a total credit of $\$7,500$.

VI.B. The Claiming Schedule and Carryforward

The credit earned in Year 3 ($7,500) cannot be claimed entirely in that year. Statutory law requires that the total amount of the credit be divided equally and claimed over four consecutive tax years (25% per year).1

• Annual Claim Amount: $\$7,500$ / 4 years = $\$1,875$ per year.
• Claiming Period: EZ Innovate Tech claims $\$1,875$ against its tax liability in 2026 (the year the expenditure was made), and in each of the subsequent three years (2027, 2028, and 2029).4

If the claimed amount for any year exceeds the taxpayer’s net income tax liability, the excess may be carried forward and claimed until it is used.4 This carryforward benefit is exceptionally valuable, as the Colorado EZ R&D credit statute allows for an indefinite carryforward period for any unused credit amount, making the credit perpetually valuable to the business.1

VI.C. Hypothetical Scenario: Relocation Penalty

To illustrate the severity of the continuous presence rule, consider if EZ Innovate Tech had moved its R&D operation from the Denver EZ to the Pikes Peak EZ in December 2025 (Year 2).

• Eligibility Loss: Despite having incurred $\$1.1$ million in QREs and performing the necessary two-year base calculation, the move resets the presence clock.1
• Delayed Benefit: The earliest the business could claim a credit would be for the tax year ending December 31, 2028 (Year 3 in the Pikes Peak EZ). This delayed eligibility significantly defers the financial return on the R&D investments made in the early years. Furthermore, they would need three new years of consecutive pre-certifications in the new zone to validate the new presence period.

VII. Strategic and Financial Implications for Businesses

The EZ R&D credit imposes strategic discipline, connecting location stability directly to corporate tax planning and forecasting.

VII.A. The Nexus with Corporate Strategy

The three-year presence requirement inherently binds corporate location decisions to the realization of this tax benefit. Tax departments must inform executive management that any decision regarding R&D facility relocation, consolidation, or expansion into a non-EZ location must account for the potential forfeiture or substantial delay of the EZ R&D credit benefits. This rule structurally reinforces the state’s objective: to encourage stability within the EZ rather than enabling fluid operational restructuring across Colorado’s EZ network. The high value and indefinite longevity of the R&D credit incentivize taxpayers to treat the EZ location as a strategic, permanent R&D anchor.

VII.B. Financial Reporting and Forecasting

The credit’s unique timing mechanism requires specific attention in financial planning. While the full credit value is determined and “earned” in the year the qualifying expenditure increase occurs (e.g., Year 3 in the example), the cash flow benefit is statutorily deferred and realized over four years (25% per annum).4

Furthermore, the feature of the indefinite carryforward significantly improves the credit’s value proposition.1 For high-growth technology firms or startups that may have minimal tax liability in the near term but anticipate high profitability years later, the credit acts as an almost perpetual deferred tax asset. Financial forecasting must incorporate this indefinite carryforward, differentiating it from other state credits that typically impose limits (such as the 5-year limit on the New Employee Tax Credit carryforward or the 14-year limit on the Investment Tax Credit carryforward).6

VII.C. Coordination with Other EZ Credits

Businesses often claim multiple EZ credits simultaneously, including the Investment Tax Credit, Job Training Tax Credit, and New Employee Tax Credit.6 While these credits have different calculation and carryforward limits, the core administrative framework remains consistent. Every EZ credit requires annual pre-certification through OEDIT.8 Maintaining consistent, diligent, and continuous pre-certification for the EZ facility is the common compliance denominator across all incentives, ensuring that the foundational requirement of EZ location is continually documented and recognized by the state.

VIII. Conclusion: Maintaining Compliance and Maximizing EZ R&D Benefits

The Colorado EZ R&D Tax Credit offers one of the state’s most powerful corporate tax incentives, distinguished by its beneficial indefinite carryforward provision. However, access to this credit is rigorously gated by the Three-Year EZ Presence Requirement, ensuring that only businesses committed to long-term stability in economically distressed zones qualify.

The core actionable compliance point for businesses is administrative consistency. The physical presence must be validated through a perfect, consecutive chain of annual pre-certification approvals issued by OEDIT for the R&D facility’s specific physical address. This documented administrative history is the definitive proof of continuous presence required by state auditors. Any lapse in pre-certification, or a decision to relocate the facility to a different Enterprise Zone, results in the immediate and complete termination of the eligibility timeline. For CFOs and tax directors, procedural discipline is therefore as critical as the underlying R&D investment itself, transforming the pre-certification application from a routine annual task into a non-negotiable component of a multi-year tax planning strategy.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/