Analysis of Excess Qualified Research Expenses within the Connecticut R&D Tax Credit Framework
I. Executive Summary: The Definition and Role of Excess Qualified Research Expenses (QREs)
Excess Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) constitute the incremental portion of Connecticut QREs incurred during the current income year that surpass the comparable amount from the immediately preceding tax period. This metric is the non-substitutable base utilized to calculate the 20% Incremental Research and Experimental Expenditures Credit (RC Credit), detailed under Connecticut General Statutes (CGS) § 12-217n.1
The State of Connecticut offers two primary research and development (R&D) incentives designed for C-Corporations: the Research and Experimental Expenditures Credit (RC Credit), which is incremental, and the Research and Development Expenditures Credit (RDC Credit), which is non-incremental.1 The RC Credit functions as an aggressive mechanism intended to reward and incentivize the sustained growth of research investment within the state. Its utility and ultimate value are dictated entirely by the precise calculation and resulting quantification of Excess QREs.2 Companies relying on this incentive must dedicate meticulous attention to expense tracking and base period management to maximize the 20% credit on their year-over-year research spending increase.1
II. Statutory and Regulatory Basis for Qualified Research Expenses in Connecticut
A. Establishing the Legal Authority and Scope: CGS § 12-217n
The legal authority for the incremental R&D tax credit is established under CGS § 12-217n, which allows a credit against the tax imposed by Chapter 208 (the Corporate Business Tax) based on research and development expenses paid or incurred during any income year.5 This framework immediately places the compliance burden on corporate taxpayers to demonstrate not only the eligibility of the expenses under federal standards but also their adherence to specific Connecticut jurisdictional and definitional modifications.
B. Defining Research and Development Expenses (QREs): Federal Conformity with State Modification
Connecticut’s definition of QREs is tethered to federal law but mandates specific adjustments and limitations. “Research and development expenses” are defined primarily by reference to two components of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) 5:
- Research or experimental expenditures deductible under IRC Section 174.
- Basic research payments as defined under IRC Section 41, to the extent these payments are not already deducted under Section 174.5
The 1993 Statutory Snapshot Rule and Federal Decoupling
A critical nuance for compliance in Connecticut is the state’s adherence to the version of IRC Section 174 “as in effect on May 28, 1993”.5 This snapshot rule creates a significant decoupling from subsequent federal changes, notably the requirement under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) that mandates the amortization of IRC Section 174 expenses over five or fifteen years at the federal level, effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2021.
For Connecticut RC credit calculation purposes, taxpayers must disregard federal amortization requirements or any elections made by the taxpayer to amortize such expenses on their federal return that were otherwise deductible.5 Therefore, even if a company is amortizing its R&D expenditures on its federal income tax return, those expenditures must be treated as immediately deductible for the purpose of calculating Connecticut QREs and, subsequently, Excess QREs. This technical divergence necessitates dual tracking of research expenditure basis and timing, ensuring the state definition reflects immediate deductibility under the historical 1993 standard.
Mandatory Connecticut Scope and Unfunded Research Exclusion
Beyond definitional conformity, two geographic and sourcing limitations apply. First, the expenditures and payments must be paid or incurred for research and experimentation and basic research explicitly “conducted in this state”.5 Second, the expenditures and payments are ineligible if they are funded within the meaning of IRC Section 41(d)(4)(H), such as by a grant, contract, or governmental entity other than the taxpayer.5 An exception exists only if the funding person is included in a combined unitary tax return with the taxpayer.5
C. Technical Requirements for Qualifying Research Activity (The Four-Part Test)
To ensure that the expenditures supporting the calculation of Excess QREs are technically sound, the underlying research activity itself must satisfy a four-part test, mirroring elements of the federal Qualified Research definition 6:
- The activity must involve R&E expenditures eligible for amortization under Section 174.6
- The research must be technological in nature.1
- The intent must be to gain new technical knowledge useful in developing a new or improved product, process, software, technique, formula, or invention to be sold, leased, licensed, or used by the business.6
- The activity must include a process of experimentation aimed at developing a new or improved function, performance, reliability, or quality.1
These criteria confirm that activities like manufacturing techniques, software development, and quality improvements can qualify, provided they meet the requisite level of technological uncertainty and experimentation.4
III. The Incremental Credit Mechanism: Calculation of Excess QREs (RC Credit)
A. Deriving the “Excess” QRE Amount
The primary function of the RC Credit is to incentivize incremental growth in in-state research spending.1 The calculation of the credit hinges entirely upon correctly defining and quantifying the Excess QREs.
The methodology prescribed by the Connecticut Department of Revenue Services (DRS) requires a straightforward year-over-year comparison.2 The determination of Excess QREs follows this formula:
$$\text{Excess QREs} = \text{Current Year CT QREs} – \text{Preceding Year CT QREs (Base Amount)}$$
Connecticut employs a simple, single-year base period, utilizing only the QREs from the single preceding tax year as the base amount.2 This approach contrasts with the significantly more complex federal methodology, which typically involves a multi-year lookback or fixed-base percentage.
The use of a single-year base simplifies administrative calculation, but it introduces a high sensitivity to annual fluctuations in spending. If a corporation experiences a large spike in QREs in one year (generating a large Excess QRE amount) followed by a normalization or reduction in spending the subsequent year, the Excess QREs for the subsequent year will likely drop to zero, emphasizing that the incentive structure inherently rewards sustained, compound annual growth rather than episodic investments.
B. Calculation of the Tentative RC Credit
Once the Excess QREs have been accurately determined, the tentative RC credit is calculated by multiplying this incremental amount by the statutory rate of 20%.1 The credit applies only to the portion of current-year spending that exceeds the previous year’s base amount.7
C. Connecticut Department of Revenue Services (DRS) Compliance Guidance
The administrative compliance for claiming the RC Credit is standardized through Form CT-1120RC, Research and Experimental Expenditures Tax Credit.8 DRS guidance outlines four mandatory steps for calculating the credit based on Excess QREs 2:
- Determine the total qualified research and experimental expenditures conducted in Connecticut for the current tax year.
- Compute the base amount, which equals the QREs incurred during the preceding tax year.
- Calculate the Excess QREs by subtracting the base amount from the current QREs. A fundamental constraint is that the base amount can never exceed the current QREs; if the difference is negative, the Excess QREs amount is zero.2
- Apply the 20% multiplier to the calculated Excess QREs to derive the tentative credit amount.3
IV. Application and Limitations of the RC Credit
A. Credit Application and Limitations
The credit derived from Excess QREs is subject to specific application rules within the Connecticut corporate tax framework. Primarily, the RC Credit is non-refundable (unless exchanged by a Qualified Small Business) and is subject to a significant ceiling: the credit may only offset a maximum of 70% of the Connecticut Corporation Business Tax liability.2 This 70% cap is a crucial feature that influences corporate tax planning, as it ensures that regardless of the size of the Excess QREs generated, the corporation remains liable for remitting at least 30% of its total tax burden to the state.10
B. Carryforward and Transferability Provisions
Any portion of the RC Credit generated by Excess QREs that cannot be utilized in the current income year due to the 70% liability cap or insufficient tax liability is eligible for carryforward.1 The maximum carryforward period for the RC Credit is 15 consecutive years.1 Notably, the RC Credit is not eligible for carryback to prior tax years.1
Furthermore, the credit is assignable or transferable. If a tax credit is assigned, the assignee is entitled to the same carryforward provisions available to the business that originally earned the credit.11 The Department of Revenue Services (DRS) relies solely on documentation provided by the Department of Economic and Community Development or the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection regarding proof of assignment.11 The ability to assign unused credits generated by Excess QREs adds potential market value, particularly in the context of mergers, acquisitions, or corporate restructuring.
C. Detailed Example of Excess QRE Calculation and Credit Determination
The following example illustrates the process of calculating Excess QREs and determining the applicable credit amount, demonstrating the direct application of the 20% rate and the effect of the 70% tax liability cap.2
Table Title: Example 1: Calculation of Excess QREs and Incremental RC Credit (Form CT-1120RC Logic)
| Calculation Component | Year 1 (Base Year) | Year 2 (Claim Year) | Formula/Result (Year 2) | Source |
| CT Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) | $1,200,000 | $2,000,000 | N/A | 2 (Illustrative) |
| Base Amount (QREs Preceding Year) | N/A | $1,200,000 | $1,200,000 | 2 |
| Excess QREs | N/A | N/A | $800,000 ($2,000,000 – $1,200,000) | 2 |
| Tentative RC Credit Amount | N/A | N/A | $160,000 (20% $\times \$800,000$) | 2 |
| Corporation Business Tax Liability (Assumed) | N/A | N/A | $200,000 | N/A |
| Maximum Credit Claimable (70% Cap) | N/A | N/A | $140,000$ (70% $\times \$200,000$) | 10 |
| Credit Utilized in Current Year | N/A | N/A | $140,000 | N/A |
| Credit Carried Forward (15 Years) | N/A | N/A | $20,000 ($160,000 – $140,000$) | N/A |
In this scenario, while the Excess QREs generated a $160,000 tentative credit, the 70% tax liability restriction limits the immediate utilization to $140,000, leaving $20,000 available for carryforward over the next 15 years.1
V. Strategic Comparison: Non-Incremental R&D Credit (RDC) Context
Taxpayers have the ability to elect either the RC Credit (based on Excess QREs) or the RDC Credit (non-incremental) in a given tax year.7 A thorough analysis of Excess QREs is only half the picture; the value must be weighed against the non-incremental RDC Credit, which offers a different incentive profile and structure.
A. Contextualizing RDC: Calculation without ‘Excess QREs’
The RDC Credit is calculated based on total current-year QREs, not on the incremental difference over the prior year.2 This makes the RDC credit more suitable for companies with stable or declining research expenditures. The primary advantage of the RDC Credit, regardless of the rate applied, is its indefinite carryforward period, a key differentiator from the RC Credit’s 15-year limit.4
B. RDC Rate Structure for Qualified Small Businesses (QSBs)
The threshold for being considered a Qualified Small Business for the purpose of the RDC credit differs from the threshold used for the credit exchange program. For the RDC credit, companies with gross income for the previous year that does not exceed $100 million are classified as QSBs and are eligible for a flat 6% credit on their total QREs.7
C. RDC Tiered Rate Structure for Large Corporations
For larger firms whose prior-year gross income exceeds the $100 million QSB threshold, the RDC credit is calculated using a tiered, progressive rate structure applied to their total research and development spending 1:
- 1% of expenditures if total QREs are less than or equal to $50 million.
- $500,000 plus 2% of the amount exceeding $50 million, if QREs are greater than $50 million but less than or equal to $100 million.
- $1.5 million plus 4% of the amount exceeding $100 million, if QREs are greater than $100 million but less than or equal to $200 million.
- $5.5 million plus 6% of the amount exceeding $200 million.1
An additional option exists for specific companies headquartered in an Enterprise Zone (EZ) with revenues exceeding $3 billion and employing over 2,500 people; these entities may elect to multiply their R&D costs by 3.5% instead of using the tiered calculations, provided the 3.5% computation yields a larger credit amount.2
VI. The Qualified Small Business (QSB) Tax Credit Exchange Program
The ability to exchange R&D tax credits—including credits generated by Excess QREs under the RC calculation—for a refund provides crucial liquidity for emerging businesses but is subject to stringent rules enforced by the DRS.12
A. The Bifurcated Definition of Qualified Small Business
A potential point of confusion for taxpayers is the existence of two distinct QSB thresholds within the Connecticut R&D regime. While the eligibility for the 6% RDC rate is based on a gross income threshold of $100 million 4, the eligibility to exchange the credit for a refund is significantly narrower.
For the purpose of exchanging tax credits (using Form CT-1120 XCH), a Qualified Small Business is defined as a company that has gross income for the previous income year that does not exceed $70 million.9 Furthermore, the company must not have met this income threshold through transactions with a related person.12 This lower $70 million threshold signals the legislature’s intent to focus immediate cash benefits only on the smallest, most capital-constrained businesses, while allowing a broader group (up to $100 million) to claim the standard, higher RDC rate against their future tax liability.4
B. Financial Mechanics and Limitations of the Exchange
The exchange mechanism is designed to provide cash liquidity but at a discount. The tax credit—whether derived from Excess QREs (RC Credit) or total QREs (RDC Credit)—may be exchanged for a refundable sum equivalent to 65% of the credit’s calculated value.4
This refund is strictly capped at $1.5 million per income year.9 Only credits that are earned in the current year and are entitled to be claimed in the current year may be exchanged; credits carried forward from prior years are explicitly excluded from the exchange program.12
C. Eligibility Requirements for Credit Utilization (Zero Tax Liability Test)
To be eligible to exchange the credit for a refund, the QSB must demonstrate that it is unable to utilize the credit because it has no Corporation Business Tax liability.9 The DRS specifies how this test is met depending on the filing method 12:
- For QSBs filing a standalone Form CT-1120: The company is permitted to exchange the credit if its apportioned amount of net income is zero or negative (regardless of the amount of its capital base tax), or if the company’s capital base tax is equal to the minimum statutory payment of $250.12
- For QSBs filing as part of a combined group on Form CT-1120CU: Exchange is permitted if the group pays tax on the capital base and the QSB’s apportioned amount of the combined group’s net income is zero or negative (regardless of its portion of the capital base tax), or the QSB’s portion of the capital base tax is equal to $250.12
D. DRS Filing Protocol for Exchange
The application for a refundable credit must be completed using Form CT-1120 XCH, Application for Exchange of Research and Development or Research and Experimental Expenditures Tax Credits by a Qualified Small Business.9
The taxpayer must attach the form documenting the credit calculation—Form CT-1120RC (for the incremental credit derived from Excess QREs) or Form CT-1120 RDC—along with all required supporting schedules and documentation, to the Form CT-1120 XCH application.8
The timing of filing is rigorously enforced: the completed application must be submitted at the same time the corresponding tax return (Form CT-1120 or CT-1120CU) is filed, on or before the original due date or, if applicable, the extended due date of the return.12 No application for refund of the tax credit may be made after this specific deadline.12 This rigidity requires corporate tax teams to finalize their Excess QRE calculations and exchange decisions well in advance of the filing cutoff.
Table Title: Qualified Small Business (QSB) R&D Credit Exchange Summary
| Parameter | Statutory Requirement/Source | Details |
| Exchange Eligibility Income Threshold | $\le \$70$ Million Previous Year Gross Income | The income test must be satisfied independently, without related-party transactions.9 |
| Exchange Amount | 65% of Credit Value | The state retains 35% in exchange for providing immediate cash liquidity.4 |
| Annual Cap on Refund | $1,500,000 | The maximum cash refund available to any one QSB per tax year.9 |
| Tax Liability Condition (CT-1120) | Apportioned net income is zero/negative, OR Capital base tax is $250 | Essential requirement to qualify as having “no tax liability” for exchange purposes.12 |
| Required Form & Timing | Form CT-1120 XCH, filed concurrently with return | Application must be timely filed by the original or extended due date; extensions for the application itself are not permitted post-return filing.12 |
VII. Conclusion and Strategic Compliance Recommendations
The Connecticut R&D tax credit regime offers substantial benefits, but their realization hinges on precise technical execution, particularly concerning the calculation of Excess Qualified Research Expenses under the incremental RC Credit.
A corporation’s compliance strategy must begin with meticulous documentation of both current-year QREs and the preceding year’s base amount. This documentation is complicated by the state’s historical reference point: auditors will focus intensely on validating that all claimed expenses adhere to the four-part test and, critically, conform to the definition of IRC Section 174 as it existed on May 28, 1993.5 This means that for state credit purposes, taxpayers must reconstruct expenses as if they were immediately deductible, disregarding the current federal requirement for amortization under the TCJA.
Tax planning requires an annual modeling exercise to determine the optimal credit election. The decision rests on evaluating 20% of projected Excess QREs (RC Credit, 15-year carryforward) against up to 6% of total QREs (RDC Credit, indefinite carryforward).1 Companies projecting stable or declining QREs, or those with highly cyclical investment, typically benefit more from the RDC due to its indefinite carryforward, while companies projecting sustained, aggressive growth will maximize benefits through the RC Credit based on Excess QREs.
Finally, for smaller, eligible entities, the opportunity to exchange the credit for cash refund is a vital capital resource. Qualified Small Businesses must vigilantly ensure they meet the $70 million prior-year gross income threshold for the exchange program and that they satisfy the zero or minimal tax liability test (i.e., $250 capital base tax).9 Given the strict administrative deadline—requiring Form CT-1120 XCH to be filed simultaneously with the main tax return by the due date—proactive calculation of Excess QREs and preparation of the exchange application is essential to prevent forfeiture of the 65% refundable credit.12
Are you eligible?
Why choose us?
Pass an Audit?
What is the R&D Tax Credit?
The Research & Experimentation Tax Credit (or R&D Tax Credit), is a general business tax credit under Internal Revenue Code section 41 for companies that incur research and development (R&D) costs in the United States. The credits are a tax incentive for performing qualified research in the United States, resulting in a credit to a tax return. For the first three years of R&D claims, 6% of the total qualified research expenses (QRE) form the gross credit. In the 4th year of claims and beyond, a base amount is calculated, and an adjusted expense line is multiplied times 14%. Click here to learn more.
Never miss a deadline again
Stay up to date on IRS processes
Discover R&D in your industry
R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services
Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.
If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.
R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services
creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.
Our Fees
Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/
Choose your state
