Analysis of the Connecticut R&D Tax Credit Refund Percentage (65% of Credit Value)

I. Executive Summary: The 65% Refund Explained

The Refund Percentage, set at 65% of the credit value, is a specialized financial mechanism allowing eligible Connecticut Qualified Small Businesses with no current state tax liability to convert their earned, unused Research and Development (R&D) tax credits into immediate operating cash flow.1 This provision represents a discounted, voluntary liquidation of a state tax asset, offering 65 cents on the dollar for the credit value, subject to strict annual limitations and eligibility criteria.1

This cash monetization provision is fundamental to Connecticut’s strategy for supporting high-growth, capital-intensive startups. The program’s statutory authority is rooted in Connecticut General Statutes (C.G.S.) § 12-217ee, which permits qualifying taxpayers to exchange their accumulated unused credits with the state for a partial cash refund.3 This exchange mechanism is fundamentally a policy tool designed to unlock “stranded credits”—tax assets earned by innovative companies that are otherwise illiquid because the companies lack sufficient taxable income to utilize them against the state’s Corporation Business Tax liability.4 By providing immediate liquidity, the state intends to promote capital reinvestment and incentivize continued R&D activities within Connecticut.

1.1 Snapshot of Key Limitations and Nuances

While offering significant financial benefits, the 65% exchange mechanism operates under specific constraints that taxpayers must understand for effective compliance and financial planning. The state imposes an absolute maximum annual refund of $1.5 million per taxpayer, regardless of the amount of unused credit generated.1 Furthermore, the program’s financial eligibility hinges on a rigorous gross income test: the business must demonstrate a gross income for the previous income year of $70 million or less.1 This $70 million threshold is critically important as it defines the narrow group of the smallest qualified businesses eligible for cash monetization.

Connecticut R&D Credit Exchange Snapshot

II. Statutory and Regulatory Framework of the Exchange Program

2.1 Legislative Intent and Statutory Basis (C.G.S. § 12-217ee)

The legal foundation for the partial refund is established under C.G.S. § 12-217ee. This statute grants any taxpayer that is a qualified small business (QSB) and qualifies for the R&D credits under C.G.S. § 12-217j (Incremental R&E) or C.G.S. § 12-217n (R&D Expenditures) the option to participate in the exchange program.3 The core condition is that the taxpayer “cannot take such credit in the taxable year in which the credit could otherwise be taken as a result of having no tax liability under this chapter”.3

The legislative language uses the definitive term “exchange” rather than “refundability” to clarify the nature of the transaction. The taxpayer must elect to “exchange such credit with the state for a credit refund equal to sixty-five per cent of the value of the credit”.3 This terminology is not merely semantic; it legally establishes the transaction as a voluntary sale or liquidation of the credit asset at a discount. By exchanging the credit for 65% cash, the taxpayer relinquishes all rights to the underlying 100% credit value, thereby legally justifying the permanent forfeiture of the remaining 35% of the exchanged portion. This mechanism ensures that the state’s expenditure on the immediate cash payment consumes the entire value of the associated tax asset.3

2.2 Conditions for Unclaimed Credits and Minimum Tax Exclusion

Eligibility for the exchange is strictly contingent upon the business having no Corporation Business Tax liability for the income year in which the credit is available.1 Connecticut law, however, recognizes that most non-profitable corporations still face minimum tax obligations. To prevent the minimum tax from disqualifying the very startups the program is intended to assist, C.G.S. § 12-217ee includes specific exclusionary language. The statute confirms that “Payment of the capital base tax under section 12-219… or payment of the minimum tax of two hundred fifty dollars under section 12-219 or 12-223c for any income year, shall not be considered a tax liability for purposes of this section”.3

This legal specification is a key policy determination that maximizes participation by nascent businesses. If the minimum tax ($250) were considered a disqualifying liability, most pre-profit startups—which are required to pay the minimum tax—would be excluded. By explicitly excluding the minimum tax from the liability test, the legislature ensures that the cash incentive targets companies with substantial R&D investments that genuinely have zero net income tax liability and are in need of immediate working capital.3

2.3 Applicable Tax Credits Subject to Exchange

The exchange mechanism is available for unused credits generated under both principal components of Connecticut’s R&D tax relief system:

1. Incremental Research and Experimental Expenditures Credit (RC) (C.G.S. § 12-217j): This credit is calculated as 20% of the excess of the current year’s R&E expenditures conducted in Connecticut over the amount spent on such expenditures during the preceding year.6 Taxpayers with gross income below $70 million that have no tax liability may exchange this credit for the 65% cash refund.6
2. Research and Development Expenditures Credit (RDC) (C.G.S. § 12-217n): This credit is calculated based on total R&D expenses, using a graduated scale (1% to 6%) for larger companies, or a flat 6% for smaller qualified businesses.8 Taxpayers whose gross income does not exceed $70 million may also elect to exchange this credit for a refund equal to 65% of its value.9

III. Detailed Eligibility Requirements for the 65% Exchange

3.1 The $70 Million Qualified Small Business Threshold

The most crucial constraint governing access to the 65% cash refund is the definition of the “Qualified Small Business” (QSB) for exchange purposes. To be eligible for the cash exchange, the business’s gross income for the previous income year must strictly be $70 million or less.1

This income calculation must be comprehensive, specifically encompassing “income derived from transactions with related entities” to prevent the manipulation of financial reporting or the artificial restructuring of the business to meet the required threshold.1 Businesses whose gross income exceeds $70 million, even those with significant R&D spending and no current tax liability, are prohibited from utilizing the cash exchange option.1

3.2 Navigating the Tiered QSB Definitions

It is imperative for tax professionals to recognize that Connecticut utilizes tiered definitions for what constitutes a “Qualified Small Business” depending on the purpose of the credit.

For the purpose of earning the beneficial Research and Development Expenditures Credit (RDC) under C.G.S. § 12-217n, a QSB is defined as a company whose gross income for the previous income year does not exceed $100 million.5 These firms qualify for the favorable 6% RDC rate on their total Qualified Research Expenses (QREs), easing entry for startups without prior-year data.5

However, the threshold for monetizing that credit via the 65% cash exchange is significantly lower: $70 million.1

This intentional difference creates a tax planning trap: a company with $90 million in prior-year gross income is considered a QSB for earning the credit (qualifying for the 6% rate) but is explicitly disqualified from the cash exchange.1 This means that once a company crosses the $70 million benchmark, it loses the option of immediate liquidity, and the earned credits must be reserved solely for future tax offsets through the 15-year carryforward provision.10 Tax planners must, therefore, treat the cash refund mechanism as an incentive available only to the narrowest and smallest tier of small businesses.

3.3 The Binary Election: Exchange or Carryforward

Eligible taxpayers who qualify for the exchange are presented with a binary choice regarding their unused credits: they may elect to carry the full credit forward for up to 15 successive income years, or they may apply to exchange the credit for the 65% cash refund.3 This election establishes the financial fate of the asset. If the taxpayer chooses the exchange, the credit is permanently liquidated according to the 65% formula.

Connecticut R&D Credit Eligibility Comparison

IV. The Mechanics of the 65% Refund Calculation

4.1 Determining the Unused Credit Value Available for Exchange

The calculation of the refund begins by determining the total amount of R&D credits (both RC and RDC) that were generated in the current income year but remain entirely unused. For eligible businesses, this is generally the total credit earned, as the requirement for the exchange dictates that they have no net income tax liability to offset.1

The formula for the tentative cash refund amount is straightforward: the available unused credit is multiplied by $0.65$.2

$$\text{Tentative Refund Amount} = \text{Unused Credit Value} \times 0.65$$

4.2 The Statutory Cap: $1.5 Million Annual Limit

A critical restriction is the annual limit imposed on the cash payout. Businesses may not receive more than $1.5 million in tax credit refunds for any one income year.1 This limit applies to the cash received, not the underlying credit exchanged.

The $1.5 million cash cap implies a maximum amount of credit that can be monetized in a single year. To yield the maximum refund, the amount of credit exchanged is calculated by dividing the cap by the refund rate:

$$\text{Maximum Credit Exchanged} = \frac{\$1,500,000}{0.65} \approx \$2,307,692.31$$

If a company generates unused credits exceeding $2,307,692.31, it can only exchange that maximum value for the $1.5 million cash payout. Any remaining unused credit beyond that value must then be carried forward for potential use in subsequent income years.10 This safeguard prevents even highly successful, but still tax-exempt, small businesses from immediately liquidating extremely large amounts of state tax equity.

4.3 Critical Analysis: Treatment of the Remaining 35%

The most significant financial implication of the exchange mechanism is the disposition of the 35% portion of the credit that is not converted into cash. When a credit is exchanged for the 65% cash refund, the entire corresponding 100% of that credit value is removed (liquidated) from the available carryforward pool.7 The 35% portion is permanently forfeited and cannot be subsequently utilized or carried forward.3

For example, exchanging $1 million in earned credit yields $650,000 in immediate cash. However, the business simultaneously forfeits the right to use the full $1 million credit against any future Corporation Business Tax liability. This 35% discount (the cost of liquidity) is the reason why a business must carefully evaluate the net present value (NPV) of the cash received today versus the NPV of the full 100% credit value realized over a potential 15-year carryforward period, factoring in the company’s cost of capital and expected timeline to profitability. For many cash-strapped startups with zero tax liability and high immediate capital needs, the certainty of 65% cash today often represents a higher effective return than a 100% asset that might not be recoverable for a decade.

V. Connecticut DRS Guidance and Compliance Procedures

Compliance with the procedural requirements set forth by the Connecticut Department of Revenue Services (DRS) is mandatory, as errors in the specific filing process for the exchange can jeopardize the receipt of the refund.

5.1 Mandatory Filing Form: Form CT-1120 XCH

The required application for the refund is Form CT-1120 XCH, Application for Exchange of Research and Development or Research and Experimental Expenditures Tax Credits by a Qualified Small Business.2 This form formalizes the election to exchange the credits.

The application must be fully supported by the detailed calculation forms used to substantiate the credits earned: Form CT-1120RC (for incremental R&E expenditures) or Form CT-1120 RDC (for general R&D expenditures). These underlying credit forms, along with all required schedules and documentation, must be physically attached to Form CT-1120 XCH.2

5.2 Integration with the Corporation Business Tax Return (Form CT-1120)

The exchange process requires the taxpayer to submit two separate packages simultaneously. On the main tax return, Form CT-1120 (Connecticut Corporation Business Tax), the corporation must indicate its election to pursue the refund exchange by checking the “Yes” box in the designated area.2 The amount of credit to be issued as a refund must also be entered in the space provided on Page 1 of the CT-1120 return.2

However, the DRS requires that the completed Form CT-1120 XCH and its supporting documentation be filed separately from Form CT-1120.2 The purpose of this mandatory separation is to initiate a distinct auditing and review pathway for the cash refund, setting it apart from the standard processing of the primary corporate tax return. Failure to adhere to this separate mailing requirement could lead to the rejection of the refund request.

The completed application (Form CT-1120 XCH) and supporting information must be mailed, at the same time as filing Form CT-1120, to the following specific address:

Department of Revenue Services

PO Box 150420

Hartford, CT 06115‑0420 2

5.3 Timing and Due Dates

The application for the refund is highly time-sensitive. C.G.S. § 12-217ee mandates that the application be made to the Commissioner of Revenue Services “at the same time such taxpayer files its return for the income year on or before the original due date or, if applicable, the extended due date of such year’s return”.3 Crucially, the statute explicitly states: “No application for refund of such credit amount may be made after the due date or extended due date, as the case may be, of such return”.3 This prevents taxpayers from making a late election to exchange credits after the filing deadline has passed.

5.4 Detailed Examination of the CT-1120 XCH Computation (Part II)

Part II of Form CT-1120 XCH calculates the final refund amount. The process aggregates the available unused RC and RDC credits:

1. The form first determines the amount of the Research and Experimental Expenditures Tax Credit (RC) available for exchange by subtracting any applied credits from the total credit.7
2. The same calculation is performed for the Research and Development Tax Credit (RDC).7
3. These available amounts are added together on Line 3, providing the total credit base for the exchange.7
4. Finally, Line 4 calculates the Total credit to be issued in the form of a refund requested by multiplying the amount on Line 3 by 65% (0.65).7 This line also serves as the control point for the statutory limitation, noting that the requested amount cannot exceed the $1.5 million cap.7

VI. Illustrative Case Study: Maximizing the Cash Flow Incentive

This case study demonstrates the financial outcomes and strategic implications when the $1.5 million annual cap is triggered.

6.1 Scenario Setup: Nova Gen R&D, Inc. (Year 2024)

Nova Gen R&D is a Connecticut-based biotech firm specializing in early-stage research.

6.2 Application of the 65% Refund Exchange (Step-by-Step)

The company has $3,000,000 in unused R&D tax credits and elects for the cash exchange.

Step 1: Calculate the Potential Refund

The potential cash refund is determined by applying the 65% factor to the total unused credit:

$$\$3,000,000 \times 0.65 = \$1,950,000$$

Step 2: Apply the Statutory Annual Cap

Although the potential refund is $1,950,000, the statutory annual limit imposed by C.G.S. § 12-217ee is $1,500,000.1

The Net Cash Refund Received by Nova Gen R&D will be $1,500,000.

Step 3: Determine Credit Value Liquidated

Since the cash refund received is capped at $1,500,000, the state liquidates only the amount of underlying credit necessary to generate that cash payout (i.e., the amount exchanged).

$$\text{Credit Value Liquidated} = \frac{\$1,500,000}{0.65} \approx \$2,307,692$$

This $2,307,692 portion of the total $3,000,000 credit is permanently surrendered to the state in exchange for the cash.

Step 4: Determine Remaining Credit for Carryforward

The unexchanged portion of the credit remains available for carryforward against future tax liabilities.

$$\text{Credit Available for Carryforward} = \text{Total Credit Earned} – \text{Credit Value Liquidated}$$

$$\text{Credit Available for Carryforward} = \$3,000,000 – \$2,307,692 = \$692,308$$

Nova Gen R&D receives an immediate cash infusion of $1.5 million and retains a $692,308 tax credit carryforward asset, which may be carried forward for up to 15 years.6

Nova Gen R&D: Refund Exchange Financial Outcome

VII. Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

The Connecticut R&D tax credit exchange program, defined by the 65% refund percentage, serves as a powerful instrument for converting illiquid tax assets into immediate working capital, directly addressing the nearly $1.8 billion in “stranded” R&D credits reported by the Department of Revenue Services in previous years.4 The program’s efficacy for the taxpayer is determined by precise adherence to both the financial thresholds and the procedural demands of the DRS.

7.1 Strategic Planning: Liquidity vs. Future Value

The choice to exchange 100% of an R&D credit for 65% immediate cash is fundamentally an economic decision that must be modeled rigorously. For businesses with high capital needs, uncertain profitability timelines, or a high weighted average cost of capital (WACC), the immediate cash flow certainty provided by the 65% refund generally outweighs the 35% discount (forfeiture).3 Immediate funds can be used for critical operating expenses, expansion, or further R&D investment. Conversely, companies anticipating stable growth and profitability within the standard 15-year carryforward window for the Incremental R&E Credit (RC) may find a higher net present value by carrying the full 100% credit forward, preserving the ability to offset future corporate tax liability at the full rate.6

7.2 The Critical Nature of the $70 Million Eligibility Cliff

A crucial element of strategic tax planning in Connecticut is meticulously monitoring gross income relative to the refund exchange threshold. The distinction between the $100 million QSB definition (for earning the credit) and the $70 million threshold (for accessing the cash refund) creates a sharp eligibility cliff.1 Once a business’s prior-year gross income exceeds $70 million, it is permanently disqualified from monetizing any unused credits via the cash exchange, forcing all credits generated into the carryforward pool.1 Companies approaching this $70 million benchmark should evaluate opportunities to accelerate R&D spending in the final eligible year to maximize the cash conversion opportunity before their growth structurally removes the liquidity option.

7.3 Compliance Best Practices

Effective utilization of the exchange requires strict adherence to DRS compliance procedures:

1. Filing Separation: The requirement to file Form CT-1120 XCH separately from the main Corporation Business Tax Return (Form CT-1120) is not optional; it is a mandatory procedural step.2 Proper adherence ensures the application is correctly routed for refund processing.
2. Timeliness: The application must be submitted on or before the original or extended due date of the tax return.3 Late applications are statutorily disallowed.
3. Documentation: The CT-1120 XCH application must be accompanied by the validated source forms (CT-1120RC or CT-1120 RDC) to validate the underlying credit amount, ensuring the claimed credit base is auditable and correctly calculated prior to the exchange.2

By navigating these specific compliance and financial requirements, Qualified Small Businesses can strategically leverage the 65% refund to accelerate growth and maximize the financial return on their Connecticut R&D investment.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/