The Strategic Independence of the Delaware Research and Development Tax Credit Election

I. Executive Summary and Statutory Foundation

The Delaware Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credit is a critical incentive for innovation within the state, codified under Del. Code Ann. tit. 30, §§ 2070-2075.1

A. The Independent Election: A Two-Line Definition and Rationale

The Delaware R&D tax credit determination election grants taxpayers the ability to select their preferred state calculation method annually, independent of the method chosen for their federal R&D tax credit determination.1 This decoupling allows businesses to optimize their state credit calculation, maximizing the fully refundable cash benefits available under Delaware law.1

This foundational principle is established in Del. Code Ann. tit. 30, § 2070(a), which explicitly states that the taxpayer’s election for the Delaware research and development tax credit determination “shall be an annual election, and shall be independent of taxpayer’s federal research and development tax credit determination”.2 This provision ensures strategic flexibility, recognizing that the method yielding the maximum benefit federally may not be the optimal choice for the distinct requirements and parameters of the Delaware credit calculation.

B. Legislative Context: Delaware’s Incentive Program Structure

The Delaware R&D tax credit program, administered by the Delaware Division of Revenue (DOR) 1, is distinguished by the incentive’s refundability. Unlike the federal credit, which is generally a non-refundable business credit, Delaware’s credit is fully refundable. This means any unused portion of the credit that exceeds the corporate income tax liability for that year is paid to the taxpayer as a cash refund.1 This feature significantly enhances the credit’s value, especially for startups and growth-stage companies that may be in a net operating loss position and thus unable to utilize non-refundable federal credits.1

The legal framework relies heavily on federal definitions to maintain consistency. Del. Code § 2071 mandates that any term used in the Delaware R&D tax credit subchapter must hold the same meaning as when used in a comparable context in the Internal Revenue laws of the United States, including references to IRC Section 41, unless explicitly provided otherwise.2 This ensures that definitions for Qualified Research Expenses (QREs), gross receipts, and similar terms align with federal standards, simplifying compliance for multi-state entities.

The structure of the Delaware incentive, combining independent calculation methods with full refundability, establishes a key strategic advantage centered on liquidity. Because the credit results in direct cash recovery rather than merely a reduction in future tax liability, the annual ability to choose the calculation method (Method A or Method B) that yields the largest numerical credit figure is paramount. This mechanism directly supports immediate corporate cash flow, which is often a critical concern for innovative businesses in pre-profit phases.

II. Detailed Analysis of the Independent Election Mandate

The statutory requirement for an independent election in Delaware fundamentally allows taxpayers to engage in regulatory optimization, leveraging the differences between state and federal calculation rules to maximize the state-level, fully refundable credit.

A. The Scope of Federal Method Choices

At the federal level, taxpayers claiming the R&D credit must select one of two primary calculation methods on IRS Form 6765: the Regular Research Credit (RRC) method or the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) method, detailed under IRC § 41(c)(5).5 The RRC method is complex, requiring historical data from a statutory fixed-base period (often 1984-1988) to determine the fixed-base percentage. In contrast, the ASC method offers a streamlined calculation, generally using 14% of current QREs exceeding 50% of the average QREs from the preceding three years.1 The federal ASC election, once made, is generally irrevocable without specific consent from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

B. The Meaning and Strategic Utility of Independent Election

Delaware’s independent election directly addresses the rigidity of the federal system. The decoupling ensures that the taxpayer’s choice of method for federal purposes—whether RRC or ASC—does not restrict the options available in Delaware.2 For instance, a taxpayer might choose the RRC federally because it provides a superior result given their extensive historical R&D activity. Simultaneously, the structure of the Delaware base calculation might make Method B (which is based on the federal ASC methodology) more advantageous for the state credit. The independent election allows the taxpayer to select Method B in Delaware, maximizing the state refund, while maintaining the RRC at the federal level.

This structural freedom also functions as a way to mitigate limitations stemming from historical data. The federal RRC often proves impractical or yields minimal benefit for newly established companies due to the historical look-back period requirements.5 While the federal ASC is generally simpler and more accessible for these entities 6, Delaware provides its own incremental method (Method A) which uses a state-specific base calculation. By allowing the independent election, Delaware guarantees that a new company can select the state method—Method A or Method B—that best utilizes a zero or minimal base period, thereby ensuring they can access maximum refundable cash regardless of the specific historical data required by the corresponding federal election.

C. Strategic Benefits: Preserving Federal Flexibility

A significant tax planning benefit derived from the independent election relates to maintaining flexibility regarding the federal ASC. As noted, the federal ASC election is often permanent. For a business experiencing rapid growth, committing to the federal ASC calculation may become disadvantageous in later years compared to switching to the federal RRC.

Delaware’s independent election provides a pathway for taxpayers to assess the potential benefits of the ASC methodology (via Delaware Method B) on an annual basis without having to make the restrictive, permanent federal commitment. This “test drive” capability allows corporate tax departments to model future federal outcomes based on current ASC calculations without sacrificing long-term federal planning flexibility, thereby ensuring optimal tax outcomes as the company matures and its QREs fluctuate.

III. Delaware Calculation Methodologies (The Two Elective Paths)

The Delaware Code provides two distinct methods for calculating the R&D tax credit, both relying exclusively on Delaware-apportioned QREs but differing significantly in their base amount determination and credit rates.1

A. Method A: The Delaware Incremental Method (Traditional Calculation)

The first elective path for the credit is the traditional incremental method, detailed in Del. Code § 2070(a)(1).2

Standard Calculation: A standard taxpayer may elect a Delaware R&D tax credit equal to $10\%$ of the excess of the taxpayer’s total Delaware qualified research and development expenses for the taxable year over the taxpayer’s Delaware base amount.2

Small Business Calculation: A crucial modification exists for qualifying small businesses. A “small business” is defined as any taxpayer with average annual gross receipts, as determined by IRC § 41(c)(1)(B), not exceeding $20,000,000$.7 For these entities, the credit rate is doubled, substituting $20\%$ for the standard $10\%$.8 Taxpayers utilizing this alternative calculation must meet the small business definition regardless of the federal R&D tax credit method they employ.7

Delaware Base Amount Determination: The base amount calculation requires rigorous historical data. It is determined using a fixed-base percentage multiplied by the average Delaware gross receipts over the four preceding taxable years.1 The calculated base amount, however, cannot fall below $50\%$ of the current year’s Delaware QREs.1 The specific use of the four preceding years for the base calculation represents a structural difference from the methodology underpinning Method B.

B. Method B: The Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) Apportionment Method

The second elective path ties the Delaware credit directly to the federal Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC).

Standard Calculation: A standard taxpayer may elect a Delaware R&D tax credit equal to $50\%$ of Delaware’s apportioned share of the taxpayer’s federal research and development tax credit.1 This calculation must utilize the alternative simplified credit method under IRC § 41(c)(5), using federal definitions and methodology.2

Small Business Calculation: For qualifying small businesses (gross receipts $\le$ $20,000,000$), the rate is increased to $100\%$ of Delaware’s apportioned share of the federal ASC.2

Apportionment Mechanics: The “Delaware’s apportioned share” is not a direct calculation but is derived from the total federal ASC amount the taxpayer can claim. This federal amount is multiplied by a ratio equal to the taxpayer’s Delaware QREs for the taxable year divided by the taxpayer’s total qualified research and development expenses for the taxable year (QRE_DE / QRE_Total).2

C. Structural Differences and Optimization

The choice between Method A and Method B hinges on key differences, particularly regarding the base period data required. Method A uses a four-year look-back period for gross receipts to calculate the base 1, whereas the federal ASC calculation that forms the basis for Method B uses a three-year look-back period for prior QREs.1 This small difference in the look-back window (four years vs. three years) can significantly alter the required base amount—the hurdle current QREs must exceed to generate a credit.

If a company had very low QREs or gross receipts four years prior, Method A’s four-year average might result in a lower base amount than Method B’s implicit three-year average calculation, thereby generating a higher volume of “excess QREs” and a larger total credit under Method A. The independent election compels taxpayers to rigorously model both methods annually against their specific historical data profile to select the most financially beneficial path.

The table below summarizes the key features of the two methodologies:

Table III.A: Delaware R&D Tax Credit Calculation Methodology Overview

IV. Division of Revenue (DOR) Guidance and Compliance Procedures

Compliance with the Delaware R&D tax credit is managed by the Delaware Division of Revenue (DOR).1 Adherence to specific administrative procedures, deadlines, and reporting requirements is mandatory for credit approval and refund issuance.

A. Administrative Oversight and Application Mandate

The Division of Revenue administers the R&D Tax Credit as part of its portfolio of economic development incentives.3 To qualify for the credit, a taxpayer must first submit an application and receive approval from the DOR.9 The credit is then applied against the taxpayer’s state tax liability, with any unused credit becoming refundable.9

B. Critical Filing Deadline: The September 15th Mandate

A stringent and critical compliance requirement imposed by the DOR is the application deadline. Qualified taxpayers must submit an application for the credit on or by September 15th following the end of the taxable year during which the qualified R&D expenses were incurred.4 This deadline necessitates that businesses complete their detailed R&D studies, quantify Delaware QREs, and make the independent calculation election months before the final filing deadlines for many corporate tax returns. This early timeline requires proactive tax planning and prioritization of the Delaware QRE quantification process, as failure to meet the September 15th application deadline results in the forfeiture of the credit for that tax year.

C. Required Forms and Reporting

The administrative process centers on two primary forms:

1. Delaware Form 2071AC: This application serves as the vehicle for the independent election. It requires the taxpayer to document detailed QREs, historical base period data, calculate the credit under both Method A and Method B, and formally choose the methodology for the year.10
2. Delaware Form 700: Once the DOR formally authorizes the credit amount, the approved figure from Form 2071AC must be transferred to the relevant line on the Delaware Income Tax Credit Schedule, Form 700.10

Taxpayers must retain extensive documentation supporting the claimed Delaware QREs and the historical data used in the base calculations, particularly the four preceding years of Delaware QREs and gross receipts necessary for Method A.1

D. Refundability and Credit Use

A hallmark of the Delaware credit is its full refundability.1 The approved credit is first applied against any Delaware income tax liability. Crucially, in accordance with Delaware law, any portion of the credit that remains unusable because it exceeds the tax liability is refunded directly to the taxpayer as cash.4 This differs sharply from many state and federal R&D credits, which are typically carried forward if unused.

V. Case Study and Numerical Example of Independent Election Strategy

The independent election provision is most clearly demonstrated through a comparative numerical analysis, highlighting how differing historical data and apportionment factors drive the optimal choice between Method A and Method B.

A. Scenario Setup: Multi-State Technology Company (Standard Business)

Consider Alpha Tech Inc., a established multi-state technology corporation with average annual gross receipts well exceeding the $20$ million small business threshold. The company is operating at the standard credit rates ($10\%$ for Method A, $50\%$ for Method B).

Tax Year 2024 Financial Data:

• Total U.S. Qualified Research Expenses (QRE_Total): $\$6,000,000$
• Delaware Qualified Research Expenses (QRE_DE): $\$1,800,000$
• Federal ASC Calculated (Prior to Apportionment): $\$250,000$ (Calculated based on $6M$ QRE_Total and the 3-year prior QRE base).
• Delaware Base Amount (Method A): $\$1,000,000$ (Calculated based on DE QREs and the 4-year prior DE gross receipts average).

B. Calculation Method Comparison

1. Modeling Delaware Method A (Traditional/Incremental)

Method A uses the Delaware-specific base amount and the $10\%$ standard rate:

1. Excess DE QREs = QRE_DE $-$ DE Base Amount
   
   $$1,800,000 – 1,000,000 = 800,000$$
2. DE R&D Credit = $10\%$ of Excess DE QREs
   
   $$0.10 \times 800,000 = 80,000$$
   
   Result A: $\$80,000$

2. Modeling Delaware Method B (ASC Apportioned)

Method B uses the federal ASC, apportioned to Delaware, and the $50\%$ standard rate:

1. Apportionment Ratio = QRE_DE / QRE_Total
   
   $$\frac{1,800,000}{6,000,000} = 0.30 \text{ (or } 30\% \text{)}$$
2. Delaware’s Apportioned Share of Federal ASC = Federal ASC $\times$ Apportionment Ratio
   
   $$250,000 \times 0.30 = 75,000$$
3. DE R&D Credit = $50\%$ of Apportioned Share
   
   $$0.50 \times 75,000 = 37,500$$
   
   Result B: $\$37,500$

C. Strategic Determination: The Independent Election Outcome

By comparing the outcomes, Alpha Tech Inc. determines that Method A yields a credit of $\$80,000$, significantly greater than Method B’s credit of $\$37,500$. Therefore, the optimal annual election made on Form 2071AC is Method A. This choice is made entirely independently of whatever method Alpha Tech chose for its federal R&D tax credit (e.g., federal RRC), maximizing the refundable cash benefit.

This example illustrates a common strategic consideration: the effect of apportionment dilution. Method B ties the size of the Delaware credit directly to the concentration of QREs within the state relative to the company’s total national QREs. Since Alpha Tech only conducted $30\%$ of its research in Delaware, the apportionment mechanism significantly diluted the federal credit base. In contrast, Method A’s base calculation, which is specific to Delaware’s historical activity, may be low enough (due to favorable four-year prior activity) to generate a larger credit based solely on the incremental growth of Delaware QREs. The ability to model both scenarios allows the taxpayer to avoid the dilutive effect of low apportionment if Method A is more favorable.

D. Scenario Re-Analysis: Small Business Benefits

If Alpha Tech Inc. qualified as a Small Business (average gross receipts $\le$ $20,000,000$), the rates change substantially:

• Method A (Small Business): $20\%$ $\times$ Excess QREs $(\$800,000)$ = $160,000.
• Method B (Small Business): $100\%$ $\times$ Apportioned Share $(\$75,000)$ = $75,000.

In this small business scenario, Method A remains the optimal independent election. The doubling of the standard Method A rate significantly enhances its attractiveness relative to Method B, reinforcing the importance of independent annual modeling regardless of business size.

Table V.A: Numerical Case Study: Strategic Election Outcomes (Standard Business)

VI. Conclusion: Implications for Corporate Tax Planning

The Independent Election provision of the Delaware R&D tax credit, as established in Del. Code Ann. tit. 30, § 2070, represents a highly valuable flexibility instrument for corporate tax planning. It grants taxpayers the crucial ability to maximize state-level refundable incentives, which provide immediate cash returns, without being structurally constrained by the often permanent or suboptimal election made for federal R&D purposes.

The critical takeaway for taxpayers is the necessity of comprehensive, dual-method modeling prior to the filing deadline. Strategic utilization of this independence requires taxpayers to:

1. Model Independently: Always calculate both the Method A (Delaware Incremental) and Method B (ASC Apportioned) credit amounts, factoring in the specific Delaware rates ($10\%$ standard, $20\%$ small business) and the enhanced Method B rates ($50\%$ standard, $100\%$ small business).8
2. Account for Structural Differences: Pay close attention to the impact of the distinct base calculation periods—the four-year look-back for Method A versus the three-year federal look-back inherent in Method B—as the optimal path often depends on the trajectory of prior years’ QREs and gross receipts.1
3. Adhere to Administrative Deadlines: Ensure that the required application (Form 2071AC) is submitted by the strict September 15th deadline following the close of the tax year.4 This timing is essential for securing the right to claim the credit and subsequently receive the cash refund.

By fully leveraging the independent election, taxpayers can convert innovation expenditures into maximized, non-dilutable cash flow, reinforcing Delaware’s position as a strategically favorable jurisdiction for conducting qualified research and development activities.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/