The Mandate of Recomputation: Navigating Amended Florida Returns Triggered by Federal R&D Tax Credit Audits

The Federal Audit Adjustment (FAA) refers to the mandatory process required under Florida Statute (F.S.) § 220.23 when a change to a corporation’s federal tax liability occurs due to an IRS determination. This mechanism demands that the taxpayer notify the Florida Department of Revenue (FDOR) and recompute their Florida Corporate Income Tax (CIT) liability using Form F-1120X within a strict 60-day timeframe of the federal adjustment being finalized.

Regarding the Florida R&D Tax Credit (F.S. § 220.196), an FAA triggered by a reduction in federal Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) creates an immediate, legally mandated requirement for recomputation and repayment of the corresponding state credit benefit, plus accrued statutory interest.1

I. Executive Summary: The Federal Audit Adjustment (FAA) in Florida

The legal framework governing corporate income taxation in Florida is inextricably linked to federal tax determinations. When the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) examines a taxpayer’s return and modifies any component of their federal tax calculation, the Florida Corporate Income Tax (CIT) Code mandates specific reporting and re-computation obligations, collectively referred to as the Federal Audit Adjustment (FAA) process.

A. Initial Definition: FAA and the R&D Credit Nexus

A Federal Audit Adjustment constitutes any redetermination of a taxpayer’s federal income, deduction, or liability—whether through an amended federal return or as a result of an IRS audit—that impacts the computation of the taxpayer’s net income subject to tax in Florida.2

The specific connection between the FAA and the Florida Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credit (F.S. § 220.196) is defined by a singular statutory requirement: the credit program explicitly necessitates a re-computation and subsequent repayment of the allocated credit amount, plus applicable interest, when a corporation’s qualified research expenses (QREs) are diminished following a federal audit or examination.1 This direct legal linkage ensures that any federal challenge to R&D expenditures immediately triggers a binding state compliance obligation.

B. Scope and Regulatory Landscape

This detailed report addresses the intersection of Florida’s corporate income tax laws with federal audit outcomes, focusing on how corporations claiming the Florida R&D credit must manage their compliance risk.

The analysis is structured around three key legislative and procedural components:

1. Florida R&D Credit (F.S. § 220.196): This statute outlines eligibility, calculation methodology, the statewide annual cap, and the mandatory repayment clause.1
2. FAA Reporting (F.S. § 220.23): This mandate governs the procedural requirements, most critically the strict 60-day deadline for reporting federal changes to the Florida Department of Revenue (FDOR).2
3. FDOR Compliance and Risk Management: This covers the specific procedural mechanism of filing Form F-1120X (Amended Florida Corporate Income/Franchise Tax Return) and the financial consequences, including severe penalties, associated with failure to adhere to the 60-day timeline (F.S. § 220.801).6

II. The Interplay of Federal and Florida R&D Tax Law

The design of the Florida R&D tax incentive ensures that its foundation is built upon and constrained by the definitions and compliance requirements of the federal Internal Revenue Code (IRC).

A. Florida R&D Credit Fundamentals (F.S. 220.196)

The Florida R&D credit, authorized under Section 220.196, Florida Statutes, is fundamentally derived from the federal R&D tax credit (IRC § 41).1

1. Eligibility and Computation

To qualify for the Florida R&D credit, a business must first meet several highly specific criteria:

• Corporate Structure: The credit is limited exclusively to corporations, as defined in F.S. § 220.03.4 Businesses structured as partnerships, limited liability companies taxed as partnerships, or disregarded single-member LLCs are ineligible, although each corporate partner within a partnership may apply separately based on its own research expenses.4
• Federal Requirement: The corporation must claim and be allowed the federal research credit for qualified research expenses under 26 U.S.C. § 41.1
• Target Industry: The business must be a qualified target industry business as defined in F.S. § 288.106.1 Specifically eligible industries include manufacturing, life sciences, information technology, aviation and aerospace, homeland security and defense, cloud information technology, marine sciences, materials science, and nanotechnology.4
• QRE Definition: The state adopts the federal definition of “Qualified research expenses” (QREs) but limits eligibility only to expenses incurred for research conducted within Florida.8

The credit calculation is structured as 10 percent of the Florida QREs that exceed the calculated base amount.1 The base amount is generally the average Florida QREs allowed to the previous four tax years.1 For newer corporations not in existence for four years, the allowable credit is reduced by 25 percent for each year the corporation did not exist.8 The maximum credit taken cannot exceed 50 percent of the taxpayer’s Florida income tax liability after claiming all other eligible credits.1

2. Allocation and Proration Risk

A critical constraint on the program is the statewide annual cap of $9 million in credits that may be granted for expenses incurred in the prior calendar year.1 Because the demand for the credit consistently exceeds this cap, a mandatory prorated allocation system is employed. Data from the 2021 allocation report illustrates this risk: the FDOR received 188 approved applications requesting over $107 million in credit, resulting in each applicant receiving only approximately 8 percent (0.08) of the amount of credit determined in their application.10

The table below summarizes the core elements of the Florida R&D credit structure and the inherent risks related to federal audits.

Table 2: Florida R&D Tax Credit Key Parameters and Audit Risk

B. The Mandatory Recomputation Clause

The binding requirement for filing an Amended Florida Return post-audit is found directly within the R&D credit statute itself. Section 220.196, Florida Statutes, explicitly “Requires a re-computation and repayment of the credit amount, plus interest, when a corporation’s qualified research expenses are reduced as a result of a federal audit or examination”.1

This provision operates as an automatic clawback mechanism. If a corporation successfully claims and uses the credit in a taxable year, or carries forward any unused credit for up to five years, any subsequent reduction in the foundational QREs by the IRS obligates the corporation to calculate the revised credit and remit the resulting deficiency to the FDOR.1

C. The Disproportionate Financial Impact of Proration

A significant financial consequence arises from the combination of the state’s strict allocation cap and the mandatory repayment clause. When demand exceeds the $9 million cap, the credit received by a taxpayer is often dramatically lower than the credit calculated based on their QREs.10

Consider a scenario where a corporation’s calculated credit is $300,000, but due to proration, they are allocated and use only $24,000 (8% allocation).10 If a federal audit subsequently determines that 80% of the underlying QREs were invalid, the corporation must re-calculate its credit based on the reduced QREs. The resulting repayment obligation, although applied only to the $24,000 allocated credit received, is triggered by documentation failure that affected the full $300,000 initial calculation. This structure means that even a corporation that received a small, prorated benefit still faces a major deficiency payment, along with penalties and interest, based on the determination that the foundational data used for the application was erroneous. The effect of non-compliance or poor documentation is thus amplified, targeting the specific cash benefit obtained by the taxpayer.

D. Base Amount Sensitivity in Audit Scrutiny

The calculation of the Florida R&D credit introduces complexities that must be addressed during an FAA re-computation, particularly concerning the base amount. The credit is fundamentally an incremental credit, based on QREs exceeding the average QREs of the previous four tax years (the base amount).1

Federal audits of R&D tax credits often scrutinize QRE methodologies across multiple tax years.11 If an IRS examination results in disallowed QREs not just in the credit year under audit, but also in one or more of the preceding four base years, the entire calculation methodology is altered. A reduction in base year QREs could decrease the base amount, which might partially mitigate the deficiency caused by current-year QRE disallowances. Conversely, an increase in QREs in a prior year—perhaps due to a technical adjustment confirmed by the IRS—could increase the base amount, disproportionately magnifying the tax deficiency in the current credit year. Therefore, corporations cannot simply subtract the disallowed current-year QREs; they are required to re-model their R&D credit calculation across all five affected years to ensure the revised Florida credit amount is accurately determined on the Form F-1120X, necessitating the preparation of appropriate supporting schedules.

III. Statutory Compliance: The Critical 60-Day Federal Audit Adjustment Rule (F.S. § 220.23)

The procedural adherence to the mandatory reporting requirement under Florida Statute § 220.23(2) is perhaps the single most important aspect of compliance following a federal audit that impacts the R&D credit. This statute ensures that Florida is notified of federal changes that influence state income tax liability.

A. The Mandatory Filing Trigger and Scope

F.S. § 220.23(2) applies when a taxpayer’s federal return is adjusted—either by the taxpayer’s own amendment or as a result of an IRS recomputation or redetermination—if that adjustment “would affect any item or items entering into the computation of such taxpayer’s net income subject to tax for any taxable year under this code”.2

A federal audit adjustment that disallows QREs clearly falls within this scope for multiple reasons:

1. Credit Impact: The reduction in QREs directly affects the calculation of the Florida R&D credit (a tax item).1
2. Income Impact: Often, a federal R&D audit adjustment involves changes to the treatment of R&E expenditures, such as capitalizing R&E costs under IRC § 174 rather than immediately deducting them. This technical change directly alters federal taxable income, which is the starting point for calculating Florida’s net income subject to tax.5

Because both tax liability (the credit) and the tax base (net income) are impacted, the filing requirement is unequivocally triggered.3

B. The Critical 60-Day Deadline

The statute imposes a non-negotiable deadline for reporting federal changes:

The taxpayer shall notify the department of such adjustment by filing either an amended return or such other report as the department may by regulation prescribe… [which] Shall be filed not later than 60 days after such adjustment has been agreed to or finally determined for federal income tax purposes, or after any federal income tax deficiency or refund, abatement, or credit resulting therefrom has been assessed, paid, or collected, whichever shall first occur.2

The 60-day window begins on the earliest date the federal matter is finalized. For most audits, this is the date the corporation and the IRS execute the agreement, typically when the taxpayer signs IRS Form 4549-A (Income Tax Examination Changes).6 This requirement is crucial because it transforms what might otherwise be a permissive amendment period into a mandatory, time-sensitive compliance duty.

C. The Primacy of Procedural Compliance over Substantive Accuracy

The strict enforcement of the 60-day filing rule highlights a core principle of state tax compliance: the primacy of procedural timeliness. The legal consequences associated with F.S. § 220.23 focus heavily on the failure to notify the state on time, independent of whether the underlying tax deficiency is correct.

If a taxpayer agrees with the IRS findings and the resulting increase in Florida tax liability (the deficiency from the disallowed R&D credit), but files Form F-1120X 61 days after the federal determination, they are automatically in violation of F.S. § 220.23(2). This procedural failure immediately triggers the failure-to-file penalty provisions outlined in F.S. § 220.801.7

The resulting financial exposure stems not merely from the principal tax deficiency caused by the credit repayment, but from the severe and cumulative penalty imposed solely for the late notification. Compliance strategies must therefore prioritize meeting the 60-day notification window, treating it as critical as the original tax return due date, to minimize exposure to disproportionate failure-to-file penalties.

D. The Unique Statute of Limitations for Refunds

While the 60-day rule governs mandatory deficiency reporting, the statute provides a unique extension if the federal adjustment results in a refund for the Florida taxpayer (e.g., if a new federal deduction is allowed).

In cases where a federal audit adjustment (FAA) leads to an overpayment of Florida corporate income tax, the taxpayer is still generally required to file the F-1120X within the mandatory 60-day window.2 However, F.S. § 220.23(2)(d) specifically allows for a refund claim based on a federal audit adjustment to be filed within two years after the expiration of the required 60-day filing date, regardless of whether the taxpayer filed the initial F-1120X report.6 This two-year look-back provision serves as a special statute of limitations for refund claims directly tied to the FAA, ensuring taxpayers have an adequate period to claim benefits derived from complex federal changes.

Table 3: Mandatory Reporting Requirements for Federal Audit Adjustments (F.S. 220.23)

IV. FDOR Procedural Guidance: Filing Form F-1120X

The mechanism for reporting the FAA and the re-computation of the R&D credit is the Florida Form F-1120X, Amended Florida Corporate Income/Franchise Tax Return. The procedural instructions issued by the Florida Department of Revenue (FDOR) delineate specific steps required to ensure compliance and avoid processing delays.

A. Form Usage and Purpose

Form F-1120X must be completed whenever a redetermination of federal income occurs through an audit adjustment that affects the Florida corporate tax base or liability.3

The form requires the corporation to enter fundamental identifying information, including the Federal Employer Identification Number (FEIN), the current and former corporate name (if applicable), and the specific tax year being amended.6 Crucially, the taxpayer must explicitly check the box indicating that the amended return is being filed as a result of an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) audit adjustment.6 The date the IRS audit report (Form 4549-A) was issued must also be entered.6

The body of the F-1120X is structured to compare the original return data against the corrected figures. Column A reports the amounts as originally filed or previously adjusted; Column B reports the corrected amount based on the FAA; and Column C shows the resulting net change (increase or decrease).13 The reduction of the R&D credit must be accurately reflected in the corresponding credit line, leading to an increase in the tax due (the deficiency) calculation.

B. Documentation Requirements

The FDOR requires comprehensive documentation to support the re-computation, allowing the Department to verify the accuracy of the revised Florida tax liability without requiring a separate state audit.14

The primary required attachment for an FAA filing is a signed, dated copy of the official IRS report that details the final adjustments. This is typically the IRS Form 4549-A (Income Tax Examination Changes) or other documents evidencing the completed audit, often referred to as a Revenue Agent Report (RAR).6 Failure to attach this documentation can lead to processing delays and potential compliance issues.13

Furthermore, if the federal change involved adjustments to items of income, deduction, or credit that required a specific schedule or statement on the original Form F-1120, an updated version of that schedule must be attached to the F-1120X.12 This is particularly relevant if the federal adjustment affects apportionment factors. If any adjustments impact the figures used to calculate the apportionment fraction—such as changes in payroll or property—Schedules III and IV of Florida Form F-1120 must be recomputed and attached to the F-1120X to determine the correct Florida portion of adjusted federal net income.12

C. Submission Protocols

The submission procedures vary based on the financial outcome of the re-computation (i.e., whether the taxpayer owes a deficiency payment or is claiming a refund).

• Deficiency Payment: If the re-computation results in a tax deficiency (the common outcome when an R&D credit is reduced), the F-1120X and the corresponding check, payable to the Florida Department of Revenue, must be mailed to: Florida Department of Revenue, 5050 W Tennessee St, Tallahassee FL 32399-0135.6 Taxpayers are required to write their FEIN on the check and ensure all returns and checks are properly signed.6
• Refund Claim: If the FAA results in an overpayment and the corporation is requesting a refund, the return is directed to a specific lockbox address: Florida Department of Revenue, PO Box 6440, Tallahassee FL 32314-6440.6

V. Financial Risk Assessment: Penalties and Interest

The financial exposure created by a federal R&D credit disallowance is magnified in Florida by stringent statutory penalties and the mechanism of retroactive interest accrual. Understanding these financial risks is paramount for tax planning and compliance strategy.

A. Failure to File Penalty (F.S. § 220.801)

The most severe procedural risk for taxpayers subject to an R&D credit clawback is the failure to meet the 60-day FAA reporting deadline. Florida Statute § 220.801 explicitly extends the standard failure-to-file penalty provisions to cover the notice of federal change required under F.S. § 220.23.7

The penalty structure is aggressive:

• Initial Penalty: 10 percent of the amount of tax due with the return for the first month or fraction thereof that the failure continues.7
• Accumulation: An additional 10 percent for each subsequent month or fraction thereof.7
• Cap: The penalty is capped at 50 percent in the aggregate.7

Because this penalty is calculated against the principal amount of the tax deficiency resulting from the R&D credit repayment, failing to file within the 60 days can rapidly inflate the compliance cost. A taxpayer who delays filing the F-1120X by just five months after the 60-day window expires faces the maximum 50% penalty on the deficiency amount.

B. Interest on Tax Deficiency (F.S. § 213.235)

Florida law requires the repayment of the disallowed R&D credit amount plus interest.1 This interest calculation is governed by general provisions for tax payment deficiencies (F.S. § 213.235).

The annual interest rate applicable to tax payment deficiencies is the adjusted rate established by the executive director of the FDOR.15 This rate is determined by referencing the “adjusted prime rate charged by banks,” specifically defined as the average predominant prime rate quoted by commercial banks to large businesses, as determined by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.15

Crucially, this interest begins to accrue not on the date the federal audit is finalized, but retroactively from the original due date of the return for the tax year in which the R&D credit was claimed.1 Given that federal audits frequently conclude several years after the tax year in question—often three to five years later—the total accrued interest expense can represent a significant portion of the final required remittance.

C. The Compounded Cost of Retroactive Interest

The combined effect of retroactive interest accrual and potential late-filing penalties poses the highest financial risk to corporations following an FAA.

Consider a scenario where an R&D credit was claimed in 2020 (return due in 2021), but the FAA finalized in late 2024. If the federal adjustment leads to a $150,000 tax deficiency (repayment of credit and adjustment to taxable income), the retroactive interest will have accrued for over three years. If the adjusted prime rate averaged 7% during that period, the interest alone could easily exceed $30,000. If the taxpayer then misses the 60-day deadline, incurring the maximum 50% failure-to-file penalty (F.S. 220.801), an additional $75,000 penalty is added to the bill.

In this scenario, the total mandated payment to the FDOR would be the $150,000 principal deficiency plus $30,000 in interest plus $75,000 in penalty, totaling $255,000. This outcome illustrates a key finding: the cost of procedural non-compliance can rapidly exceed the underlying principal tax deficiency, transforming a compliance requirement into a major financial liability. Strict adherence to the 60-day rule is essential for limiting this punitive compounding of costs.

VI. Detailed Case Study: Recalculating the R&D Credit Post-Audit

To illustrate the necessary re-computation and the application of financial risks, the following scenario details the process for InnovateCorp, which received a proration on its R&D credit.

A. Scenario Setup: InnovateCorp (Tax Year 2021)

InnovateCorp, an eligible C-corporation in the Information Technology sector, claimed the Florida R&D credit for tax year 2021. The corporation filed its 2021 return on April 1, 2022. Due to high demand for the credit, the FDOR allocated a prorated credit amount.

B. Step-by-Step Recomputation of the Florida Credit

The corporation must first determine the revised, allowable credit amount based on the federal audit outcome, followed by the actual deficiency amount owed to Florida.

1. Determine Revised Excess QREs (F.S. 220.196):

• Revised QREs: $15,000,000 (Original) – $2,500,000 (Disallowed) = $12,500,000
• Revised Excess QREs: $12,500,000 – $12,000,000 (Base) = $500,000

1. Determine Revised Calculated Credit:

• 10% of Revised Excess: $0.10 \times \$500,000 = \$50,000$ (Revised Calculated Credit)

1. Determine Repayment Obligation (Deficiency):

• The original calculated credit was $300,000. The revised credit is $50,000.
• The percentage of the original calculated credit that was disallowed by the QRE reduction is: $(\$300,000 – \$50,000) / \$300,000 \approx 83.33\%$.
• Since the original credit received was only $24,000 (due to proration), the corporation must repay 83.33% of the actual allocated credit used.
• Required Repayment (Tax Deficiency): $0.8333 \times \$24,000 \approx \textbf{\$20,000}$.
• This $20,000 deficiency must be reported on Form F-1120X.

C. Application of Timelines, Interest, and Penalty

1. Mandatory Filing Deadline (F.S. 220.23):

• The federal determination date was October 1, 2024.
• The 60-day statutory filing period ends on November 30, 2024. InnovateCorp must file the F-1120X and remit payment by this date to avoid procedural penalties.

1. Interest Accrual (F.S. 213.235):

• The $20,000 deficiency begins accruing interest retroactively from the original tax return due date (e.g., May 1, 2022).
• If the FDOR adjusted interest rate averaged 6% annually for the 31-month period (May 2022 to November 2024), the interest component would be approximately: $\$20,000 \times 0.06 \times (31/12) \approx \textbf{\$3,100}$.

1. Penalty Scenario (Late Filing):

• If InnovateCorp fails to file and pay until March 1, 2025 (4 months after the 60-day deadline), the failure-to-file penalty (F.S. 220.801) is imposed at 10% per month, capped at 50%.7
• Penalty Rate: 4 months late $\rightarrow 40\%$.
• Penalty Amount: $0.40 \times \$20,000 = \textbf{\$8,000}$.

1. Total Required Remittance (Late Filing):

• Deficiency Principal: $20,000
• Interest Accrued: $3,100
• Penalty Imposed: $8,000
• Total Payment Due: $31,100.

D. Complex Flow-Through of Federal Income Adjustments

It is rare for an R&D credit adjustment to occur in isolation. Federal audits often result in changes to the treatment of the underlying R&E expenditures, which, in turn, impacts the computation of Florida’s corporate income tax base.

If, for instance, the federal audit required the capitalization and amortization of certain R&E expenses under IRC § 174, this would increase the federal taxable income (FTI) reported to the IRS. Since Florida’s corporate tax starts with FTI, this FTI increase flows directly through to the Florida tax calculation.5 The taxpayer must then recalculate the net income subject to tax on the F-1120X, factoring in the altered federal income.

Furthermore, if the disallowance of QREs was based on determining that certain research activities were conducted outside of Florida, or involved personnel whose compensation was incorrectly attributed, the data used for the apportionment fraction (Schedules III and IV) may also require adjustment.13 This complex flow-through requires careful re-modeling of both the tax base and the apportionment percentage on the Amended Return. The final tax deficiency filed with the FDOR is therefore often a composite of two deficiencies: the R&D credit repayment and the increased tax due to higher apportioned federal income. Penalties and interest apply to the combined total deficiency amount, reinforcing the need for expert-level precision in managing the FAA process.

VII. Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

The regulatory structure of the Florida Corporate Income Tax Code establishes a direct and mandatory relationship between federal audit outcomes and state compliance obligations, particularly concerning the Florida R&D Tax Credit. The linkage via F.S. § 220.196 (mandatory repayment) and F.S. § 220.23 (mandatory 60-day reporting) means that a federal audit adjustment (FAA) is not a mere option for state filing but a legally enforceable command.

The analysis confirms that the primary financial risk following an R&D credit disallowance in Florida stems less from the initial credit repayment and more from the statutory penalties and retroactive interest accrued due to procedural missteps. The high rate of statewide credit proration further emphasizes this risk, as corporations face repayment obligations and penalties that target the small allocated benefit received, yet are triggered by major documentation flaws that affected the large calculated credit amount.

A. Critical Compliance Imperatives

1. Strict 60-Day Adherence: The utmost priority is the timely filing of Florida Form F-1120X. Compliance must be executed within the 60-day statutory window following the final federal determination, regardless of whether that determination results in a deficiency or a refund. Failure to adhere to this deadline triggers the aggressive monthly compounding failure-to-file penalty (up to 50%) under F.S. § 220.801.7
2. Comprehensive Recomputation: The amended filing must account for the full scope of the federal changes. This requires not only re-calculating the R&D credit using the revised QREs and base amounts, but also updating any corresponding changes to federal taxable income, including the application of R&E capitalization rules, and adjustments to state apportionment schedules (Schedules III and IV) if factors were affected.13
3. Documentation and Verification: The Amended Return must be accompanied by the mandatory supporting documentation, including a signed copy of the IRS Form 4549-A or Revenue Agent Report, to validate the reason and extent of the adjustment.6

B. Strategic Risk Mitigation

Corporations that claim the Florida R&D credit must integrate proactive risk management procedures into their tax compliance protocols to neutralize the punitive risks associated with the FAA:

• Establish Internal FAA Monitoring: Immediate identification of the federal determination date (the signing of the closing agreement or issuance of the final assessment) is essential to start the 60-day clock accurately. A formalized internal procedure for flagging and escalating IRS audit closures must be established.
• Integrated Documentation Strategy: Since the Florida R&D credit definition is tied to IRC § 41, documentation supporting QREs—including detailed payroll records, job descriptions, and activity logs—must meet the heightened scrutiny applied by the IRS.17 A robust federal documentation package serves as the only defense against a state-level repayment mandate.
• Financial Provisioning: Taxpayers must proactively account for the inevitable retroactive interest that will accrue on any potential deficiency. Adequate financial provisioning should begin immediately upon notification of a federal audit, recognizing that the final settlement amount will likely exceed the principal tax deficiency due to multi-year interest accumulation.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/