The Florida R&D Tax Credit: Analyzing the Strict Exclusion of Research Conducted Outside Florida

I. Executive Summary: The Geographic Mandate for Florida R&D Credits

The exclusion for Research Conducted Outside Florida mandates that only qualified research expenses (QREs) physically incurred within Florida’s state borders are eligible for the Florida Research and Development (R&D) tax credit (Section 220.196, F.S.).1 Expenses related to research activities performed by employees or contractors located outside the state are strictly prohibited from inclusion in the credit calculation base.1

This core geographical requirement is Florida’s most profound modification to the federal R&D tax credit framework (Internal Revenue Code, IRC, Section 41). While Florida adopts the technical definition of qualified research activities and expenditures established under IRC §41, it imposes a non-negotiable physical situs test for those expenditures. For multi-state corporations, this mandate translates into a critical compliance burden: meticulous, location-based tracking of all QRE components—payroll, supplies, and contract work—is necessary to accurately segregate eligible Florida-sited activities from all excluded out-of-state research. Failure to strictly enforce this physical presence rule results in an overstatement of the credit base and subsequent audit risk.

II. The Florida R&D Credit Ecosystem: Context and Restrictions

The Florida Research and Development Tax Credit is governed by Section 220.196, F.S., and detailed in Rule 12C-1.0196, F.A.C., providing a corporate income tax credit for eligible businesses that incur qualified research expenses within the state.2

A. The Legislative Framework

The structure of the Florida R&D credit is intentionally restrictive, designed to channel tax incentives toward specific economic goals. The incentive is calculated as 10% of the taxpayer’s “qualified research expenses in Florida” that exceed a base amount, which is defined as the average of Florida QREs for the four preceding tax years.4

A fundamental prerequisite for claiming the state credit is that the corporation must simultaneously claim and be allowed a research credit against federal income tax for those qualified research expenses under IRC §41.7 This strict dependency on the federal credit ensures that the underlying activities meet the demanding four-part test established by the IRS for qualified research.8

B. Critical Eligibility Prerequisites

Access to the Florida R&D tax credit is constrained by several specific eligibility requirements that limit the pool of claimants and further the state’s economic development objectives:

1. Entity Type: The credit is exclusively available to C-Corporations, as defined in Section 220.03, F.S..5 Businesses structured as partnerships or limited liability companies taxed as partnerships are ineligible. However, a corporate partner of such an entity may apply separately for an allocation of credit based on its share of allocated partnership QREs, provided that the underlying research was conducted within Florida.7
2. Targeted Industry Requirement: Eligibility is limited to corporations certified by the Florida Department of Commerce (FloridaCommerce) as a qualified business in one of nine specific targeted industries.9 These industries include Manufacturing, Life Sciences, Information Technology, Aviation and Aerospace, Homeland Security and Defense, Cloud Information Technology, Marine Sciences, Materials Science, and Nanotechnology Industries.5 A valid certification letter from FloridaCommerce is a mandatory attachment for the annual application to the Department of Revenue (DOR).3
3. Credit Limitations and Caps: The total credit amount taken by a taxpayer may not exceed 50% of the Florida corporate income tax liability after all other statutory credits have been applied.3 Furthermore, the credit is subject to an annual statewide cap, which is currently $9 million.4 Should the aggregate amount sought by applicants exceed this cap, the credits are allocated to each qualified applicant on a prorated basis.5 There is potential for this cap to increase significantly; for example, legislation proposed an increase to $50 million, beginning with expenses incurred in the 2025 calendar year (applying to the 2026 allocation).12 Any unused credit may be carried forward for up to five years.11

The convergence of these strict prerequisites—C-corporation status, certification in a targeted industry, and the subsequent geographical sourcing requirement—demonstrates a deliberate policy choice by Florida. The state is utilizing the tax credit not merely as a mechanism for general tax relief but as an economic precision tool, geographically channeling high-value investment into state-approved sectors. The strict prerequisite of FloridaCommerce certification, coupled with the geographic exclusion, acts as an administrative safeguard to ensure that the limited state credit budget translates directly into tangible in-state benefits, such as job creation and infrastructure development within specified industries.

III. Legal Analysis of the “Research Conducted Outside Florida” Exclusion

The most critical factor distinguishing the Florida R&D credit from its federal counterpart is the strict physical location requirement for all expenditures.

A. The Statutory and Regulatory Mandate

The Florida statute defining the credit explicitly restricts qualified research expenses to those that have a physical situs within the state. Section 220.196(1)(b), F.S., states that qualified research expenses must be for “in-house research expenses incurred in Florida or contract research expenses incurred in Florida”.1

This is followed by the definitive exclusionary clause: “The term ‘qualified research expenses’ explicitly does not include research conducted outside Florida”.1

This mandate is reinforced by administrative guidance from the DOR. Rule 12C-1.0196, F.A.C., requires taxpayers to provide documentation or other evidence specifically detailing the amount of “qualified Florida research expenses incurred”.2 The location of the research activity, rather than the location of the corporation’s headquarters or the payment remittance, is the sole determinant of eligibility.

B. Disconnect from Federal IRC §41 and Apportionment Rules

For corporations operating in multiple jurisdictions, the geographic exclusion creates a significant divergence between federal and state QRE calculation methodologies.

For federal purposes under IRC §41, QREs are generally not restricted to a single state; the federal focus is entirely on the technical nature of the activity.13 A company performing R&D globally may claim the federal credit for those expenses. Florida, however, demands a physical situs test for every dollar claimed.

Furthermore, Florida’s methodology for calculating the R&D credit base is decoupled from the state’s standard corporate income tax (CIT) apportionment rules. Florida determines a corporation’s CIT liability based on the standard three-factor apportionment formula (property, payroll, and sales).14 The R&D credit, conversely, uses a strict, activity-based situs test. Consequently, a multi-state corporation could have a high taxable income apportioned to Florida (perhaps due to a high sales factor, as defined in Section 220.15(5), F.S.) but claim zero Florida R&D credit if its primary R&D activities (payroll and laboratory infrastructure) are physically sited entirely in other states. The credit is therefore clearly established as a direct investment incentive tied to job and facility location, rather than a proportional tax relief mechanism linked to overall profitability in the state.

An additional compliance complexity arises from the dependence on federal approval. If the amount of qualified research expenses claimed by the taxpayer is subsequently reduced as a result of a federal audit or examination, the Florida credit must be immediately recalculated. The taxpayer is then required to file amended Florida returns for all affected years and repay the difference between the initial credit amount and the recalculated amount, plus interest, in accordance with Section 220.807, F.S..1

IV. Mechanical Application: Sourcing QRE Components to Florida

To successfully claim the Florida R&D credit, taxpayers must meticulously document how each category of federal QRE is physically performed or consumed within Florida’s borders.

A. Sourcing In-House Qualified Wages

Federal law includes wages paid for qualified services—direct research, direct supervision, or direct support—performed by employees.15 Florida adopts this definition but applies a strict situs test.

The key determinant for the Florida credit is the physical location where the qualified services are rendered.1 Only the portion of an employee’s wages attributable to time spent performing qualified services within Florida can be included in the Florida QRE base.

This mandates granular time-tracking for any employee who splits time between Florida and other states. If a highly-compensated engineer spends 55% of their qualified research time in a Florida facility and 45% in a Texas testing center, only 55% of their associated QRE wages are eligible for the Florida credit. For highly mobile or remote workforces, this means that standard payroll records based on residence or administrative office location are insufficient. Taxpayers must implement specialized R&D time-tracking systems, potentially utilizing data related to physical presence (e.g., project logs or access data), to accurately defend the physical situs of the research activity against potential DOR scrutiny. The burden of proof rests entirely on the taxpayer to substantiate the time spent performing qualified services physically in Florida.

B. Sourcing Qualified Supplies and Computer Rental/Lease Costs

In-house research expenses also include the costs of supplies used up in the research process and rental or lease costs for computers used in qualified research.8

For supplies, the controlling factor for Florida eligibility is the location of consumption. Supplies must be consumed or physically used directly in research activities that take place in Florida.1 The location where the supply was purchased, manufactured, or stored before consumption is immaterial. For example, chemicals bought in New York but used in a laboratory analysis performed in Tampa are Florida QREs. Conversely, components purchased in Orlando but shipped to a prototyping facility in Alabama for consumption in qualified research are excluded.

Similarly, for computer rental or lease costs, the expense is sourced to the location of the use. If a Florida R&D team utilizes high-performance computing resources leased from a server farm located outside the state, the expense should qualify, provided the research activity being controlled and executed by the personnel is physically based in Florida.

C. Sourcing Contract Research Expenses

Federally, taxpayers can include 65% of any amount paid or incurred to an unrelated third party for qualified research, or 75% if paid to a qualified research consortium.8

For the Florida credit, this federal inclusion rate (65% or 75%) only applies if the underlying research performed by the third party is physically conducted in Florida.1 This rule is absolute.

A Florida corporation contracting a research lab must require documentation specifying the physical location of the research performance. If a Life Sciences firm based in Miami contracts a specialist lab in California to perform a $1,000,000 qualified experiment, federally $650,000 is included as a QRE. However, for Florida purposes, zero of that contract expense qualifies because the research was physically conducted outside Florida. Only if the California lab had performed the work through a satellite facility located in Florida would the $650,000 expense be eligible.

V. Operational Compliance and Financial Reporting

Navigating the Florida R&D credit requires adherence to strict deadlines and specific reporting protocols enforced by both FloridaCommerce and the Department of Revenue (DOR).

A. The Time-Sensitive Allocation Process

The Florida credit operates under a highly time-sensitive annual application process for the allocation of the credit. Corporations must complete and submit the application electronically to the DOR during a narrow window, typically running from March 20 through March 26 of each calendar year the credit is available.5

A critical preliminary step is obtaining the FloridaCommerce Certification. The corporation must first submit the Certification Request Form to FloridaCommerce, often by the end of February (e.g., February 28, 2025, for that cycle).7 This certification, which confirms the business is a qualified target industry enterprise, is valid for three years, after which the company must be re-certified to submit an application for allocation of credit.7 If the required certification letter is not received before the DOR application window closes, the business is unable to apply for the credit allocation.17

The application for credit allocation and the subsequent tax claim are made via Florida Form F-1120, the corporate income tax return.18 Corporations must attach several required forms, including the FloridaCommerce certification letter, a copy of federal Form 6765 (Credit for Increasing Research Activities), and federal Form 3800 (General Business Credit).2 Further detailed program requirements and guidelines are found in the DOR’s Tax Information Publication (TIP) #17C01-01.3

B. Consequences of Misstatement and Audit Adjustments

The strict linkage between the federal credit and the Florida credit creates intertwined compliance risks. If a taxpayer overstates the credit amount requested, the DOR will apply the original allocation percentage to the lesser, corrected amount.1 This applies specifically to the failure to accurately isolate and exclude research conducted outside Florida.

The consequence for non-compliance is significant. If an audit determines that a portion of the claimed QREs was not, in fact, incurred in Florida, or if the federal base is reduced, the resulting decrease in the Florida credit amount must be repaid to the Department along with accrued interest.1 The need for granular, geographically specific recordkeeping is paramount to mitigating these repayment risks.

VI. Practical Application Example: Multi-State Geographic Sourcing Failure

The following example illustrates the direct financial impact of the “Research Conducted Outside Florida” exclusion on a multi-state corporation’s eligible QRE base.

A. Scenario Setup: InnovateTech Systems Inc.

InnovateTech Systems Inc., a C-Corporation certified in the Information Technology industry, operates R&D facilities in Florida and Texas. The company incurred significant QREs during the year but failed to meticulously track the geographical location of all activities.

Key Financial Data:

B. Isolation of Research Conducted Outside Florida

The corporate tax team performs an in-depth review, isolating the physical situs of all QREs to determine the Florida-specific base.

Table 1: Sourcing of Qualified Research Expenses (QREs)

Note: Federal QREs use 100% of qualified wages and supplies, and 65% of contract research expenses. The Florida amount uses 100% of FL-sited wages/supplies and 65% of FL-sited contract research.

C. Calculation of the Florida R&D Tax Credit

1. Calculate Total Florida QREs: $1,795,000
2. Calculate Excess Florida QREs: $1,795,000 (FL QREs) – $1,000,000 (Base Amount) = $795,000
3. Calculate Tentative Florida Credit (10%): $795,000 $\times$ 10% = $79,500.5
4. Determine 50% Tax Liability Limit: $300,000 (CIT Liability) $\times$ 50% = $150,000.3
5. Final Credit Allowed: Since the Tentative Credit ($79,500) is less than the liability limit ($150,000), InnovateTech is allowed a maximum credit of $79,500, subject to the prorated state-wide cap.

D. Resulting Financial Insight

Of InnovateTech’s $3,500,000 in total federal QREs, $1,705,000 was ultimately excluded from the Florida calculation base because the research was conducted outside Florida. Had the company assumed that a percentage apportionment based on its overall Florida activity would suffice, or failed to meticulously track the physical situs of its expenses, the resulting credit claim would have been invalid. The exclusion of this substantial portion of out-of-state QREs demonstrates the strict, location-specific nature of Florida’s incentive policy, directly linking tax relief to the physical presence of R&D investment within the state.

VII. Strategic Conclusion and Expert Recommendations

The Florida R&D tax credit provides a valuable incentive for targeted industries but is fundamentally defined by its rigorous geographical sourcing requirement. The exclusion of research conducted outside Florida is not a mere nuance but a primary compliance hurdle that demands specialized financial and operational controls.

The credit structure requires corporations to achieve a high standard of proof regarding the physical situs of all claimed expenditures. For large multi-state enterprises, this geographical constraint means that relying on standard federal QRE documentation is insufficient and carries substantial audit risk. Success in claiming the credit is highly dependent on effective administrative processes, including strict adherence to the annual application windows and timely procurement of the FloridaCommerce certification.

A. Key Compliance Imperatives

1. Mandatory Disaggregation of QREs: Taxpayers must recognize that Florida requires the complete disaggregation of federal QREs into Florida-sited components versus excluded non-Florida components. This necessitates a detailed mechanical review, applying the situs test to wages, supplies consumption, and contract performance locations, independent of the corporate income tax apportionment formula.
2. Rigorous Documentation for Mobility: For employees who travel or work remotely, standard payroll or HR records based on the legal employment location are insufficient. Taxpayers must implement robust time-tracking systems capable of substantiating the percentage of time spent performing qualified services physically in Florida.
3. Contractual Due Diligence: When engaging third-party researchers, the Florida corporation must enforce contractual requirements that mandate the research be physically performed within the state. If the contract research is outsourced to a facility outside Florida, 65% of that cost (or 75% for consortiums) is unequivocally excluded from the Florida credit base.

B. Expert Recommendations for Strategic Compliance

To maximize the Florida R&D credit while mitigating compliance risk, corporations should adopt the following strategic protocols:

• Establish a Dedicated Florida QRE Tracking System: Develop accounting and payroll systems that automatically segregate QREs based on physical location, moving beyond federal definitions to address the state’s situs rule. This ensures that only expenses for research conducted within Florida are fed into the credit calculation.
• Synchronize Certifications and Applications: Due to the compressed application window (typically March 20–26) and the prerequisite FloridaCommerce certification (often due in late February), proactive calendar management is vital. Certification requests that are not submitted and secured in advance will lead to the forfeiture of the credit opportunity for that year.7
• Monitor Legislative Changes: Given the potential for a significant increase in the annual credit cap (e.g., from $9 million to $50 million) 12, corporations should continually monitor legislative activity. An increased cap would reduce the risk of prorated allocation and substantially increase the potential value of the credit, further justifying investment in compliance protocols to maximize Florida-sited QREs.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/