The Consumption and Localization Mandate: Expert Analysis of Qualified Supply Purchases for the Georgia R&D Tax Credit (O.C.G.A. § 48-7-40.12)

A Qualified Supply Purchase in Georgia is defined as tangible, non-depreciable property consumed entirely during the process of conducting qualified research; the critical state mandate is that both the purchase and the physical consumption of the supply must occur within the geographical limits of Georgia.1

The Georgia Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credit, established under O.C.G.A. § 48-7-40.12, is an incremental incentive designed to encourage in-state innovation. The core requirement for expenditures, including supplies, is adherence to a rigorous dual-compliance test: the federal Consumption Test and the Georgia Localization Test. This report delivers an exhaustive analysis of the definition, application, regulatory guidance, and necessary compliance standards for purchases of supplies qualifying as Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) under this statute.

I. Executive Summary: The Dual Mandate for Qualified Supply Purchases

A. The Dual Compliance Test: Consumption and Localization

The Georgia R&D credit framework integrates federal and state requirements. To qualify as a QRE, a purchase of supplies must first meet the rigorous standards established by Section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC).1 This involves proving that the materials are tangible property and that they are entirely used up or consumed in the research process (the “Consumption Test”).3

Subsequently, the expense must satisfy the mandatory state-specific sourcing rule: the “Localization Test.” O.C.G.A. § 48-7-40.12 explicitly requires that “all purchases of… supplies must be for research conducted within the State of Georgia”.1 This restriction is unique to the state credit, adding a critical geographical layer to compliance. High-level audit scrutiny for supply costs centers on verifying that the materials were tangible, non-depreciable, used exclusively in qualified experimentation, and that the physical consumption occurred within a Georgia R&D facility.3

B. Georgia Credit Structure Overview

The incentive mechanism provides a 10% credit on Georgia-apportioned QREs that exceed a historical base amount.6 The credit is capped, offsetting up to 50% of the remaining Georgia net income tax liability after all other credits have been applied.1 A significant feature of this incentive is the ability to convert unused credit into effective cash flow through an election to offset state payroll withholding liability.6 This provision dramatically enhances the value of the credit for companies with limited income tax liability but substantial payroll obligations in the state. The statutory modification of the federal QRE definition creates a jurisdictional audit risk, requiring multi-state businesses to precisely isolate and document in-state material consumption.1

II. Statutory and Regulatory Framework of Qualified Supply Expenses (QREs)

A. The Federal Nexus: Adoption of IRC Section 41 Definitions

1. Definition of Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) and the Georgia Adoption

Georgia statute O.C.G.A. § 48-7-40.12(a)(4) explicitly relies on the definition of “qualified research expenses” as outlined in Section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.1 These QREs include in-house research expenses—specifically wages, supplies, and amounts paid for the right to use computers in research—and contract research expenses.8 This dependency means that all foundational rules developed at the federal level regarding what constitutes qualified research (the four-part test) and what types of costs are eligible apply directly to the Georgia calculation.

2. The Federal Definition of “Supplies” (IRC § 41(b)(2)(C)): The Consumption Test

The federal baseline for qualifying supplies imposes specific restrictions concerning the property’s character and eventual disposition.2 The definition restricts “supplies” to tangible property.2 Critically, this definition excludes land, improvements to land, and any property of a character subject to the allowance for depreciation.2 This means that R&D equipment, manufacturing facilities, or even general-purpose computer hardware used in research cannot be claimed as supplies, as they are capital expenditures.

The defining characteristic of an eligible supply is the “Consumed Test”: the property must be entirely “used up or consumed in the research process”.3 Qualified examples include raw materials, testing components, chemical reagents, and specialized materials incorporated into prototypes that are subsequently destroyed or scrapped during the process of experimentation.6 Costs that taxpayers frequently misclassify as supplies, such as overhead, facility rent, license fees, and utilities, are explicitly excluded under IRC § 41 regulations, as they do not constitute tangible property consumed in the research.9

Reliance on the federal definition ensures Georgia auditors will strictly enforce the “consumed in the research” rule, using standards consistent with the IRS Audit Technique Guide.9 Therefore, any material that retains economic life or is eventually incorporated into the final commercial product fails the consumption test and must be excluded from the QRE base.

B. The Georgia Localization Mandate: Research “Conducted Within the State”

1. O.C.G.A. § 48-7-40.12: The Critical State Modification

While the federal credit requires research to be conducted within the United States, Georgia imposes a strict intrastate geographical restriction.5 O.C.G.A. § 48-7-40.12 mandates that the research expense qualifies only if the supplies are “for research conducted within the State of Georgia”.1 This modification is the key differentiator for multi-state filers.

2. Interpretive Analysis: Sourcing Supplies Based on Consumption Location

For supplies, the legal interpretation sources the expense based not on where the supply was purchased or invoiced, but on the location of the activity that physically consumes the supply.6 A supply purchase is qualified only if the specific testing, experimentation, or prototyping that utilizes that material occurs within Georgia.

This localization requirement places an exceptionally high burden on taxpayers to document the physical movement and disposition of R&D materials. Failure to prove precisely where the consumption occurred—even if the material is fundamentally eligible under the federal definition—invalidates the expense for Georgia purposes. This requirement establishes a sourcing liability waterfall: the federal consumption test must be met first, followed by the specific proof of in-state consumption. Without proof of the physical presence of the qualified research activity utilizing the supply within Georgia state lines, the QRE claim will be disallowed, necessitating a robust system for tracking physical inventory from procurement to final use within Georgia facilities.

III. Georgia Department of Revenue (DOR) Guidance and Compliance Posture

A. Statutory Reliance and Regulatory Gaps

1. Absence of Specific, Current R&D Administrative Rules

Review of the Georgia Administrative Code reveals a lack of specific, published administrative regulations detailing the audit procedures or definitions for R&D supply QREs. The relevant chapter indicates that many historical rules, such as 560-7-8-.06, have been repealed.12

Given the absence of unique state regulations, the Georgia Department of Revenue (DOR) relies heavily on the explicit language of O.C.G.A. § 48-7-40.12, applying the federal standards (IRC § 41 and associated regulations) for the definition of “supplies” and then strictly enforcing the state-specific localization mandate.1

2. Mandatory Reporting and Federal Integration

Taxpayers claiming the Georgia R&D tax credit must submit Georgia Form IT-RD and attach the detailed Federal Form 6765 to their Georgia income tax return.6 Federal Form 6765 provides the itemized breakdown of QREs, including wages, supplies, and contract research.15 By requiring the federal form, the DOR gains full visibility into the categorization of the underlying expenses, allowing auditors to focus on applying the Georgia-specific sourcing rules to those categories.

B. Inferential Guidance from State Procurement and Tax Administration

While direct R&D income tax guidance is limited, the DOR’s administrative focus on geographical sourcing for other tax types provides insight into potential audit areas. The DOR administers specific forms (ST-12, ST-12A, ST-12B) related to sales and use tax refunds, procedures that necessitate verifying the ultimate location and use of purchased goods.16

This administrative capability demonstrates that the DOR possesses the institutional framework to audit the physical location and disposition of purchases.16 Consequently, auditors may cross-reference R&D supply QRE claims—which drive the income tax credit—with sales tax data or purchasing records to confirm the in-state consumption mandate. It is crucial for taxpayers to ensure that any sales tax exemptions or refunds claimed on R&D materials align logically and geographically with the asserted Georgia QRE location, minimizing conflicting signals to state tax authorities.

IV. Documentation and Audit Defense for Supply QREs

The defense of supply QREs during a DOR audit necessitates documentation that concurrently validates the federal Consumption Test and the Georgia Localization Mandate. Consistent with federal standards, documentation should be maintained at the business component level.6

A. Supporting the Federal Consumption Test (The Nature of the Expense)

1. Financial Segregation and Classification

Taxpayers must maintain financial records that isolate supply expenses from other costs, demonstrating that the materials were properly expensed (not capitalized) and were segregated within R&D cost centers.9 Key records required for substantiation include detailed general ledger entries tagged specifically to qualifying R&D projects, supporting purchase orders, and vendor invoices that clearly describe the tangible materials acquired.15

2. Proof of Direct Use and Destruction

Proof of direct linkage between the supply and the experimentation must be established. The documentation should quantify the supply usage and confirm that the materials were consumed in resolving technological uncertainty related to a new or improved business component.15

Essential documentation includes:

• Technical Logs: Testing logs and modification reports detailing the application of the supply.15
• Inventory Records: Material usage reports and scrap reports confirming the destruction or elimination of the supply during testing.3
• Project Documentation: Design documents and technical specifications that detail why specific materials were necessary for the R&D process.15

B. Proving the Georgia Localization Mandate (The Location of Consumption)

This is the non-negotiable requirement of O.C.G.A. § 48-7-40.12. Taxpayers must demonstrate the physical location where the consumption occurred.

1. Mandatory Linking of Consumption to Georgia Facilities

Documentation must confirm that the physical R&D activity utilizing the supply took place in Georgia. This requires integrating financial records with facility and activity tracking records.

Key records for location proof include:

• Facility assignment records specific to R&D activities.
• Internal reports tracking the inventory transfer of the supply from central storage to a designated Georgia R&D laboratory or testing site.
• Time tracking systems for R&D employees performing qualified services in Georgia, confirming their involvement in the project consuming the supplies.5

2. Risk Mitigation for Mobile R&D and Multi-State Purchases

Proving “conducted within the State of Georgia” requires more sophisticated internal controls than merely showing a Georgia billing address on a vendor invoice.1 When supplies are purchased nationally or if R&D involves mobile or border-adjacent testing, the risk of disallowance is heightened.

To establish an auditable chain of custody, companies should implement mandatory protocols that require R&D purchase orders to specify the intended Georgia R&D facility as the final destination and point of consumption. This practice provides a traceable link from procurement through inventory to verifiable, in-state use, thereby mitigating the risk of incorrect QRE sourcing during an audit.6

V. Financial Modeling: Integrating Supply QREs into the Credit Calculation

The Georgia R&D tax credit is calculated using a single incremental method, requiring exclusive use of Georgia-apportioned data.6

A. Total Georgia QREs Calculation

The total Georgia QREs represent the sum of all qualifying expenses—wages, contract research, computer rental costs, and supplies—that satisfy both the federal consumption test and the Georgia localization test.1 Only the supply purchases confirmed as consumed within Georgia are included in this total QRE figure.

B. The Georgia Base Amount Determination

The credit is granted only on the QREs that exceed a “base amount,” which is determined by historical R&D investment relative to Georgia gross receipts.6

Table 1: Georgia R&D Base Amount Determination Mechanics

The methodology requires taxpayers to accurately track and apportion historical QREs to Georgia.6 Every dollar claimed as a QRE this year, including supply costs, contributes to the historical base average used in subsequent years’ calculations.6 This relationship carries a long-term strategic implication: claiming marginal or poorly documented supply QREs may result in a minor immediate credit benefit but could disproportionately inflate the future base amount. This long-term base erosion could lead to a net reduction in credit value over the carryforward period (up to 5 or 10 years, depending on the generation date).6 A conservative approach ensures only indisputably qualified and locally consumed supplies are claimed, thus protecting the low base for future, more substantial R&D investments.

C. Credit Application and Carryforward Rules

1. Limitation and Offset

Once the gross credit (10% of excess QREs) is calculated, it is first applied to the taxpayer’s income tax liability. The credit taken in any single year cannot exceed 50% of the remaining Georgia net income tax liability after all other credits have been applied.1

2. The Payroll Withholding Election

A core advantage of the Georgia credit is the flexibility for excess credits. Any credit remaining after the income tax offset limitation can be elected against the company’s state payroll withholding liability.6 This mechanism is highly valuable as it effectively transforms the tax credit into a reduction in required state payroll deposits, providing a direct, non-taxable cash flow benefit to the business.7

3. Carryforward Period

Unused credits are subject to specific carryforward periods. For credits generated in tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2025, the carryforward period is five years. Credits generated prior to 2025 are allowed a longer carryforward period of up to ten years.6

VI. Comprehensive Case Study: Qualification and Calculation Example

A. Factual Scenario: BioGenetics Research, LLC (2024 Tax Year)

BioGenetics, LLC, a Georgia business enterprise engaged in life sciences research, operates a primary R&D facility in Atlanta.6 The company is developing new genetic sequencing kits. The research involves high-volume, destructive testing requiring specialized reagents and proprietary disposable sensor strips.

• 2024 Supply Purchases: $\$350,000$. All materials are consumed in controlled experiments conducted entirely within the Atlanta R&D facility.
• 2024 Wages QREs (GA-sourced): $\$1,150,000$.
• Total Georgia QREs (Current Year): $\$1,500,000$.
• Current Year Georgia Gross Receipts (GR): $\$20,000,000$.
• Historical Ratios (GA QREs/GA GR): PY-1: 5.5%; PY-2: 6.0%; PY-3: 7.5%.
• Remaining Georgia Net Income Tax Liability: $\$280,000$.

B. Supply Qualification Analysis

The $\$350,000$ in testing kits and reagents qualify for the following reasons, successfully passing the dual compliance test:

1. Consumption Test (IRC § 41): The items are tangible chemical reagents and disposable sensor strips. They are destroyed during the experimentation process, retaining no residual value and are thus non-depreciable. They are used directly in the conduct of qualified research activities, meeting the “consumed in research” requirement.2
2. Localization Test (O.C.G.A. § 48-7-40.12): Documentation, including detailed lab logs and inventory transfer reports, confirms that the reagents and sensor strips were physically consumed during experimentation conducted exclusively within the Atlanta R&D facility, satisfying the “conducted within the State of Georgia” mandate.4

C. Calculation and Utilization Example

The calculation below demonstrates how the qualified supply QREs contribute to the total credit generation and utilization.

Table 2: Example Calculation Framework for Georgia R&D Tax Credit (Illustrating Supply Integration)

In this scenario, BioGenetics successfully utilizes the entire $\$23,400$ credit to reduce its income tax liability. If the Gross Credit had been, for instance, $\$150,000$, only $\$140,000$ (50% cap) could be applied to the income tax, and the remaining $\$10,000$ would be available for the payroll withholding offset election or carryforward.6

VII. Conclusion and Risk Mitigation Strategies

The Georgia R&D tax credit provides a substantial incentive for in-state innovation, notably through its structure allowing for a cash-generating payroll withholding offset.6 However, the successful inclusion of supply expenditures into the QRE base is entirely dependent on adhering to the simultaneous federal Consumption Test and the state Localization Mandate. The limited direct guidance from the Georgia Department of Revenue places a premium on robust, auditable documentation that anticipates challenges based on federal audit practices and state sourcing requirements.

To mitigate audit risk pertaining to “Purchases of Supplies,” taxpayers are advised to adopt the following best practices:

1. Prioritize Location Tracking Over Purchase Location: While utilizing the federal IRC § 41 standards (tangible, non-depreciable, consumed) as the qualitative baseline, the primary focus for documentation must be to generate transactional evidence proving the supply was physically consumed by qualified research activities conducted within Georgia.1
2. Establish Auditable Traceability: Companies operating across multiple jurisdictions must implement specialized project management and inventory systems capable of linking supply invoices and purchase orders directly to specific, identified Georgia R&D projects and physical facilities.15 This traceability must withstand scrutiny regarding inventory transfers and end-use confirmation.
3. Maintain Granular Consumption Records: Detailed testing logs, scrap reports, and material usage documentation are essential to support the exact quantity of the supply item that was consumed during the qualified research process in Georgia. This level of detail confirms the consumption requirement and provides definitive proof of the in-state activity.15
4. Manage Base Erosion Strategically: Taxpayers should critically evaluate the qualification of marginal supply expenses, recognizing that every claimed QRE dollar increases the future base amount.6 Focusing on high-confidence QREs protects the lower historical base, maximizing the credit generated on future, significant R&D investments.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/