Expert Report on the Geographic Sourcing Mandate: Research Conducted Within the State of Georgia and the R&D Tax Credit

The concept of “Research Conducted Within the State of Georgia” in the context of the Georgia Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credit is a stringent geographic sourcing rule. It means that the Georgia Department of Revenue (DOR) will only recognize qualified research expenses (QREs) for wages, supplies, and contract services that are strictly and entirely performed or consumed within the state’s physical boundaries.1 This mandate differentiates the state credit from its federal counterpart by requiring 100% in-state performance, necessitating precise tracking for multi-state enterprises.

This requirement, codified under the Official Code of Georgia Annotated (O.C.G.A.) § 48-7-40.12, defines the economic benefit by ensuring state resources are allocated solely to innovation physically occurring in Georgia. This report provides an exhaustive analysis of the statutory definition, the application of DOR regulations, strategic compliance requirements, and a detailed financial example for Georgia taxpayers.

I. Foundation and Mechanics of the Georgia R&D Tax Credit

The Georgia R&D Tax Credit is designed as a powerful incentive to spur economic growth by subsidizing private sector investment in innovative activities. Understanding the foundation of this incentive is crucial before addressing the specific geographic constraint.

A. Legal Authority, Intent, and Basic Eligibility

The credit is established under O.C.G.A. § 48-7-40.12.3 The legislative intent is clearly focused on stimulating further R&D investment, leading to positive economic spillovers, the creation of high-wage, high-tech jobs, and the development of local “agglomeration economies” around core technical industries.5

The credit is available to a broad spectrum of business enterprises, notably including those engaged in manufacturing, warehousing and distribution, processing, telecommunications, tourism, broadcasting, or research and development industries.3 Unlike R&D credits in some other states, Georgia offers a distinctive advantage in that it is open to all entity types—C-corporations, S-corporations, partnerships, and Limited Liability Companies (LLCs) are all eligible.3

B. Credit Calculation Overview and Limitations

The Georgia R&D Tax Credit is calculated as a 10% incentive applied to the amount of qualified research expenses that exceed a state-specific base amount.2

While the credit generation is generous, its utilization is capped. In any given taxable year, the amount of credit utilized may not exceed 50% of the business enterprise’s remaining Georgia net income tax liability after all other credits have been applied.1 This limitation ensures the taxpayer maintains a baseline level of tax remittance to the state.

A significant benefit for companies with substantial QREs but limited income tax liability is the allowance for utilizing excess R&D tax credit against state payroll withholding.3 This feature provides a crucial cash-flow benefit by converting excess non-refundable credit into a practical reduction in required state remittances.

C. Linkage and Mandatory Alignment with Federal IRC § 41

A fundamental requirement for eligibility in Georgia is that the business must claim and be allowed a research credit under Section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) for the same taxable year.1 This linkage means that all activities must first meet the rigorous federal four-part test for qualified research (including technological uncertainty, process of experimentation, and qualified purpose).3

This reliance on federal qualification is an administrative mechanism designed to enhance efficiency. By requiring the taxpayer to pass the complex technical review of research activity validation at the federal level, the Georgia Department of Revenue can focus its resources primarily on reviewing the state-specific economic requirements: geographic sourcing and the base amount calculation. This administrative strategy maintains the integrity of the subsidy program while minimizing the state’s need to develop specialized technical expertise to validate the scientific eligibility of the research performed.

A key implication concerning credit longevity stems from recent legislative updates affecting unused credits. Credits generated in tax years beginning prior to January 1, 2025, may be carried forward for 10 years.3 However, for credits generated in taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2025, the carryforward period has been statutorily reduced to five years.3 This shortening of the credit utilization window suggests a legislative preference for compressing the fiscal impact window, which in turn elevates the importance of the immediate payroll withholding offset as a mechanism for fast credit utilization, particularly favoring established companies with high immediate tax liabilities over long-term growth startups.

II. Definitional Analysis: “Research Conducted Within the State of Georgia”

The phrase “Research Conducted Within the State of Georgia” represents the definitive constraint that shapes Georgia’s R&D tax policy and creates the most significant compliance challenge for multi-state operations.

A. The Strict Sourcing Mandate: A 100% Rule

The statutory language defines “Qualified research expenses” by referring to the definition in IRC § 41, but immediately imposes a critical state modification: “except that all wages paid and all purchases of services and supplies must be for research conducted within the State of Georgia”.1

This mandate implies a zero-tolerance, 100% sourcing rule. Unlike the federal standard which often allows for prorating or uses an 80% threshold for employee wages, Georgia explicitly demands that the physical performance or consumption of the research inputs must occur entirely within the state’s geographic borders to qualify for the credit. This principle applies uniformly across the three primary components of QREs: Qualified Research Wages, Cost of Supplies, and Contract Research Expenses.

B. Sourcing of Qualified Research Wages

For companies employing researchers across state lines, the segregation of labor costs must be meticulous. Only wages paid for the specific time an employee—such as an engineer, scientist, technician, or direct supervisor—is physically performing qualified research activities inside Georgia are includible.

For example, if a software development company based in Atlanta employs a chief engineer who spends 80% of their R&D time in the Atlanta office and 20% traveling to a testing facility in South Carolina, only the wages attributable to the 80% of R&D time spent physically in Atlanta would qualify for the Georgia credit. The wages corresponding to the 20% out-of-state time are disallowed, even if that work qualifies for the federal credit.

The strict 100% in-state mandate creates heightened compliance risk for companies utilizing hybrid or remote workforces, especially near state borders. Where employees may routinely split time between a Georgia residence and a client site or partner facility in an adjacent state, the Georgia rule eliminates the tolerance often found in federal QRE methodologies. This requires enterprises to adopt robust geo-location verification methods, such as integrated VPN logs, GPS-enabled mobile applications, or mandatory location entries in time sheets, to accurately substantiate the physical location of the research activity and ensure compliance.

C. Sourcing of Supplies and Materials

The cost of supplies (tangible property consumed in R&D) is sourced based on the precise location of use.1 This requirement necessitates sophisticated inventory control and accounting protocols that track materials from procurement and inventory through their final consumption within a designated Georgia R&D facility.

If a multi-state manufacturer maintains a centralized procurement function in Georgia but ships $50,000 worth of specialty chemicals to a laboratory in Texas for testing, those supply costs are entirely disallowed for the Georgia credit. The physical consumption of the supply must occur in Georgia to meet the sourcing rule.

The stringent sourcing requirements for both labor and supplies function as an economic shield. By demanding that state R&D funds exclusively subsidize inputs physically residing within Georgia, the legislature ensures that the incentive maximizes local economic impact. This prevents the “leakage” of the incentive benefit to other states and directly supports the goal of building and reinforcing a local high-technology core economy.6

D. Sourcing of Contract Research Expenses

Payments made to third parties for qualified research services are sourced to the location where the third party physically conducts the research.1

The claiming business enterprise must exercise due diligence and obtain sufficient documentation from the contract researcher to verify that the services were performed entirely within Georgia. A Georgia company contracting with an engineering firm located in Florida fails this test if the work is performed at the Florida location, even if the end product is used in Georgia.

III. Georgia Department of Revenue Regulatory Guidance and Base Amount Methodology

The application of the Georgia R&D Tax Credit is governed by the statutory framework and the procedural guidance issued by the Department of Revenue (DOR), primarily articulated in Revenue Regulation 560-7-8-.42.4

A. DOR Regulation 560-7-8-.42: Definition and Scope

Regulation 560-7-8-.42 confirms the structure of the credit, defining the various inputs necessary for its calculation. Specifically, the regulation reiterates the core geographic constraint: the term “qualified research expenses” means those defined in IRC § 41, modified by the requirement that “all wages paid and all purchases of services and supplies must be for research conducted within the State of Georgia” [2].

B. Defining and Sourcing “Georgia Gross Receipts”

The calculation methodology is entirely dependent on Georgia-sourced data. The base amount, which must be exceeded before any credit is generated, utilizes a critical input: Georgia Gross Receipts (GR).

The term “Georgia gross receipts” refers specifically to the numerator of the gross receipts factor used in the state’s corporate income tax apportionment formula, codified in O.C.G.A. § 48-7-31(d). This means that GR is derived only from in-state sales of tangible or intangible property. All data used in the base calculation—both Qualified Research Expenses and Gross Receipts—must be “Georgia-sourced only,” specifically excluding non-Georgia expenses, receipts, services, or allowances.

C. The Incremental Base Amount Calculation Formula

The incentive is fundamentally an incremental credit, granted only for R&D investment that exceeds a calculated historical baseline.

The term “base amount” is defined as the product of the business enterprise’s Georgia gross receipts in the current taxable year and a specific calculated factor :

$$\text{Base Amount} = \text{Current Year Georgia Gross Receipts} \times \text{Factor (F)}$$

The Factor (F) is determined as the lesser of two ratios:

1. The Historical Ratio Average (R): The average of the ratios of its aggregate qualified research expenses (Georgia-sourced QREs) to Georgia gross receipts (Georgia-sourced GR) for the three immediately preceding taxable years.
2. The Statutory Floor: 0.300 (or 30%).

If a business enterprise is a startup, or otherwise had no Georgia gross receipts during any one or more of the three preceding tax years, the regulation mandates that the 0.300 factor must be used as the base ratio.

The high level of detail required for this calculation underscores the state’s intent to link the R&D subsidy directly to the localized economic activity generated in Georgia.

Table 4: Base Amount Calculation Mechanics (Georgia DOR Reg. 560-7-8-.42)

A significant strategic advantage arises from how Georgia couples its corporate tax policy with the R&D credit base calculation. Georgia employs single-factor apportionment for corporate income tax, focusing largely on the sales factor. This structure tends to reduce the effective rate of Georgia income taxation for companies with substantial sales outside the state. Concurrently, using only Georgia Gross Receipts in the R&D base calculation keeps the base amount low for multi-state firms. This regulatory alignment results in a highly favorable dual incentive: the taxpayer’s overall Georgia tax liability is minimized through apportionment, while the calculated R&D credit is maximized due to the low base amount, allowing for greater utilization or potential withholding offset.

However, the mandatory 30% base floor for new entrants or companies lacking three years of Georgia sales history creates a substantial initial hurdle. A company generating $\$1,000,000$ in Georgia Gross Receipts must incur $\$300,000$ in QREs just to reach the base amount. In contrast, an established firm with a lower historical ratio, perhaps $10\%$, would only need $\$100,000$ in QREs to reach the base. This disparity suggests that the state incentivizes sustained, high-volume R&D commitment over moderate initial investments by new market entrants.

IV. Compliance and Apportionment Challenges in Practice

The “100% in-state” mandate requires corporate tax departments to go beyond standard federal R&D documentation practices. Compliance requires the implementation of strict controls to isolate and meticulously document Georgia-specific QREs.

A. Sourcing Labor Costs: Best Practices for Employee Time Tracking

The central compliance challenge is proving the physical location of the R&D activity. Traditional federal QRE studies, which focus heavily on the functional review of activities, are inadequate for the Georgia credit.

Taxpayers must integrate R&D time tracking systems with mechanisms that capture geographic location data. This may involve utilizing GPS tracking for mobile employees, verifying physical presence through centralized IT system login logs (e.g., VPN connections geo-located to Georgia servers), or mandatory, auditable entry of location information on all travel days. For supervisory wages, the allocation must be refined not just functionally (R&D vs. non-R&D) but geographically (Georgia R&D vs. Non-Georgia R&D) based on where the supervision physically occurred.

In the modern context of permanent remote work, the definition of “research conducted within the State of Georgia” must prioritize the employee’s physical home office location if that location is within Georgia. If a qualified researcher performs their R&D duties entirely from a compliant home office in Georgia, their QRE wages are sourced to Georgia, regardless of where the corporate headquarters or management structure is located (e.g., in a different state). The focus remains solely on the physical site of performance, ensuring the credit directly supports the R&D job within the state.

A critical best practice for multi-state companies is the establishment of an entirely separate, unique General Ledger (GL) account or Cost Center solely for recording and processing Georgia-Compliant QREs. This strict segregation of expenses provides immediate clarity and defensibility during a DOR audit. Any expense booked to this dedicated Georgia QRE cost center is supported by the affirmation that it meets the in-state requirement, allowing the audit focus to shift from expense identification to the verification of the internal controls supporting the booking process.

B. Accounting for Supplies and Contract Research

The accounting controls necessary for supplies must be rigorous. Inventory control systems must be capable of tracing the consumption of materials to the specific R&D project and physical location within Georgia. A failure to demonstrate this precise consumption location means the entire supply QRE is potentially unclaimable.

For contract research, the taxpayer must include specific language in agreements requiring the contractor to certify the physical location of performance as 100% within Georgia. Furthermore, the claiming company should secure documentation, such as invoices listing the performance location or detailed time sheets, to substantiate the sourcing claim effectively.

C. Documentation and Claim Filing Requirements

To claim the credit, a business enterprise must submit Georgia Form IT-RD along with the federally filed Form 6765 when filing its Georgia income tax return.

The primary focus during a state tax audit will be on verifying the physical in-state performance and consumption data that constitutes the Georgia QRE numerator. Therefore, robust audit preparation should prioritize documentary evidence—such as time logs, employee expense reports, facility utilization records, and contractor certifications—that conclusively links the expenditures to the state’s geographic boundaries.

V. Financial Modeling and Strategic Credit Utilization

Strategic financial modeling is necessary to maximize the value of the Georgia R&D credit, especially given the state-specific base calculation and utilization limitations.

A. Comprehensive Calculation Example (Year 2024)

This example illustrates the practical application of the base amount calculation and the 10% credit rate, assuming the company has sufficient historical data (a three-year average ratio below 30%).

Table 5: Comprehensive Georgia R&D Tax Credit Calculation

B. Maximizing Value: The Payroll Withholding Offset

The payroll withholding offset is a critical mechanism for ensuring the maximum financial recovery of the R&D investment. In the example above, the excess credit of $\$5,000$ (Line 12) can be used to reduce the amount of state income tax required to be withheld from employee paychecks and remitted to the DOR. This flexibility effectively converts the remainder of the non-refundable income tax credit into a means of generating immediate cash flow by reducing the taxpayer’s withholding remittance obligation. Utilizing this offset requires a specific, timely election with the DOR.

The strategic priority for companies should be to exhaust the credit capacity in a specific order: first, applying the credit against the income tax liability up to the 50% statutory cap, and second, applying any remaining credit against the state payroll withholding liability. Immediate utilization through the withholding offset provides a superior time value of money compared to a long-term carryforward, mitigating the risk of future legislative changes or economic instability preventing full utilization.

C. Management of Unused Credits and Statutory Change

Unused credits must be managed based on their generation date due to the recent statutory change in carryforward periods.

Table 3: Georgia R&D Tax Credit Utilization and Carryforward Rules

The reduction of the carryforward period to five years for credits generated in tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2025, substantially increases the reliance on the payroll withholding offset for maximum financial recovery. Entities that generate high volumes of R&D credit but maintain fluctuating or insufficient income tax liability must ensure they possess sufficient Georgia payroll to absorb the offset, otherwise, the credit risks expiring unused after the shortened five-year window.

VI. Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

The Georgia R&D Tax Credit is a robust incentive, characterized by its strict geographic constraint: the explicit mandate that all expenses must be for research conducted within the State of Georgia. This 100% sourcing rule is the defining feature that drives compliance requirements and calculation complexities for multi-state businesses. By coupling the stringent in-state mandate with flexible utilization options (the income tax offset and the payroll withholding offset), Georgia ensures that the state subsidy directly supports local job creation and enhances the competitive advantage of R&D investment within the state.

A. High-Level Strategic Recommendations

1. Mandatory Geo-Sourcing System Implementation: Taxpayers must immediately refine internal time tracking and expense reporting systems to capture granular geographic data for all R&D personnel and consumption of supplies. This level of documentation is critical to meet the 100% in-state threshold, particularly for hybrid and remote employees who cross state lines.
2. Establish Dedicated GA QRE Accounting: To enhance audit defensibility, a dedicated General Ledger cost center should be established solely for expenses that have been verified and certified as 100% Georgia-compliant QREs, segregating them entirely from nationwide or multi-state expenditures.
3. Prioritize Payroll Offset Election: Given the statutory reduction of the carryforward period for post-2025 credits, financial modeling must prioritize utilizing the payroll withholding offset for any excess credit generated. This election maximizes the time value of the credit and mitigates long-term expiration risk.
4. Model the 30% Base Floor: New or expanding businesses must model the impact of the mandatory 30% base floor against projected Georgia gross receipts to accurately forecast the required incremental QRE spending necessary to begin generating a credit benefit.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/