Expert Analysis of the Georgia Research and Development Tax Credit for Telecommunications (NAICS 517)

I. Executive Summary and Statutory Definition of Telecommunications (NAICS 517)

A. Concise Definition and Strategic Overview

The Telecommunications subsector, defined under NAICS Code 517, is primarily engaged in operating and/or providing access to facilities for the transmission of voice, data, text, sound, and video using various transmission technologies.1 Georgia explicitly includes this industry for the state Research and Development (R&D) tax credit, offering a 10% incentive on qualified research expenses that exceed a calculated base amount, provided the underlying activities satisfy federal Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41 standards.2

The Georgia R&D Tax Credit, codified primarily under O.C.G.A. § 48-7-40.12, represents a substantial benefit for telecommunications firms investing in state-based innovation. This incentive is particularly powerful due to its dual application: it can be used to offset up to 50% of the net Georgia income tax liability after all other credits are applied, and, uniquely, any excess credit may be used to offset state payroll withholding.4 For NAICS 517 firms—which are often engaged in high-cost, cutting-edge development such as 5G/6G network modulation, Internet of Things (IoT) platform architecture, and AI-driven network automation 6—strict compliance with both the federal qualification criteria and Georgia’s administrative guidance is essential for maximizing this financial advantage and optimizing corporate cash flow.

B. Comprehensive Scope of NAICS Code 517

The Telecommunications subsector encompasses establishments that facilitate the critical infrastructure necessary to transmit electronic content, including voice, data, text, sound, and video.1 This infrastructure may rely on a single technology (e.g., wired fiber) or a combination of technologies (e.g., satellite and wireless hybrid networks).7

The official North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) further segments this subsector into several key industry groups, reflecting the varied nature of telecommunications operations 7:

• Wired Telecommunications Carriers (NAICS 5171): Includes traditional landline, cable, and fiber optic carriers.
• Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (except Satellite) (NAICS 5172): Covers cellular and mobile network operators.
• Telecommunications Resellers (NAICS 5173): Firms that purchase capacity and resell services without owning the full transmission infrastructure.
• Satellite Telecommunications (NAICS 5174): Providers of satellite-based communications.
• Cable and Other Program Distribution (NAICS 5175).
• Other Telecommunications (NAICS 5179): Catch-all for specialized services not covered elsewhere.

It is paramount for tax eligibility that the entity’s research activity, not merely its broad industry classification, is the focus of compliance. A crucial technical exclusion exists for establishments primarily engaged as independent contractors in the physical installation and routine maintenance of telecommunications systems, as these are classified in Sector 23 (Construction).1 Consequently, while a wireless carrier (5172) developing a new beam-forming array would have qualifying R&D activity, a construction firm hired by that carrier to lay fiber optic cable (Sector 23) would not have qualified research expenses (QREs) related to the physical installation work, even though both activities contribute to the overall telecommunications landscape. The analysis of whether a company qualifies shifts immediately from the broad industry code to the specific technical activities undertaken and the expenditures incurred.

II. Georgia Statutory Framework: O.C.G.A. § 48-7-40.12

A. Confirmation of Telecommunications Eligibility

The Georgia R&D Tax Credit is governed by O.C.G.A. § 48-7-40.12.3 The statute explicitly extends eligibility to business enterprises engaged in several key economic sectors, including manufacturing, processing, warehousing and distribution, tourism, broadcasting, research and development industries, and, critically, telecommunications.2 This inclusion confirms that companies operating under NAICS 517 are statutorily recognized as potential recipients of the incentive.

Furthermore, GADOR guidance and supporting code sections emphasize the link between the credit and a substantial physical presence within the state. Taxpayers are instructed to refer to related statutes (O.C.G.A. §§ 48-7-40.2, 40.3, and 40.4), which stipulate that eligible taxpayers must operate a “manufacturing or telecommunications facility or manufacturing or telecommunications support facility in the state”.2 This operational requirement ensures that the incentive promotes R&D investment linked to in-state infrastructure and job creation, distinguishing the R&D credit from simple investment credits that may require a rigid three-year operational history.9 Nevertheless, the Georgia Department of Economic Development affirms that the R&D credit is broadly available to new companies as well, provided they increase their qualified research spending.5 The focus for obtaining the R&D credit remains primarily on the existence of qualified research activity in Georgia, which satisfies federal criteria.

B. The Principle of Federal Conformity

A core tenet of the Georgia R&D Tax Credit is its reliance on federal law. The Georgia statute mandates that a tax credit is allowed only if the business enterprise for the same taxable year “claims and is allowed a research credit under Section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended”.3

This strict requirement of federal conformity means that Georgia’s tax credit is not an independent incentive but rather a “piggyback” credit. The entire scope of eligible activities, qualifying expenses, and specific exclusions (such as those related to foreign research or internal use software) must first be established under IRC § 41. Therefore, strategic tax planning for a Georgia telecom firm must begin with a comprehensive, audit-ready federal R&D study, as the Georgia benefit is a calculated extension of that foundational federal analysis.

C. Calculation Basis and Rate

The Georgia credit is calculated as an incremental incentive. The credit rate is set at 10 percent of the Georgia QREs that exceed a calculated “base amount”.2

The methodology for establishing this base amount fundamentally follows the federal structure outlined in IRC § 41(c), which determines the base amount by multiplying the fixed-base percentage by the average annual gross receipts for the four taxable years preceding the credit year.10 A critical divergence from the federal framework is that Georgia requires this base amount calculation to be based exclusively on Georgia gross receipts, necessitating careful apportionment calculations.4 This dependence on state-apportioned receipts requires companies to maintain meticulous state-level financial records to ensure the accurate determination of the incremental increase in R&D spending within the state.

III. Federal Qualification Standards: The IRC § 41 Four-Part Test

Since the Georgia credit is tethered to federal law, the eligibility of any R&D activity conducted by a NAICS 517 firm is ultimately determined by the rigorous definitions of “qualified research” under IRC § 41(d).

A. Defining Qualified Research Expenses (QREs)

QREs are the expenditures that form the basis of the credit calculation. They must be directly related to activities satisfying the Four-Part Test. QREs are limited to three categories 11:

1. Wages: Amounts paid or incurred for employees who directly conduct, supervise, or directly support the qualified research. These wages must meet the federal definition under IRC 3401(a). If an employee dedicates most of their time to research, their full wages may qualify.12
2. Supplies: Costs of tangible personal property consumed or used in the conduct of qualified research, explicitly excluding land, buildings, or depreciable property.12 For a telecom firm, this often includes specialized electronic components, testing materials, and prototype equipment.
3. Contract Research Expenses: Sixty-five percent (65%) of amounts paid to third-party contractors to perform qualified research on behalf of the taxpayer.10

B. The Four-Part Test: Nexus for Telecommunications Innovation

For any expense to be a QRE, the underlying research activities must satisfy all four tests simultaneously. This combination ensures that the credit is focused on truly innovative, technically uncertain, and experimental efforts, rather than routine improvements or maintenance.14

1. Permitted Purpose (Functional Test)

The activity must seek to develop or improve the function, performance, reliability, or quality of a new or existing business component.13 For a telecommunications carrier, this includes developing new wireless protocols (such as 6G network architectures), optimizing edge-compute network platforms, or creating next-generation modulation schemes.6

2. Elimination of Uncertainty

The activity must be intended to discover information that eliminates technical uncertainty regarding the development or improvement of a business component’s capability, methodology, or design.14 In the telecom sector, this involves resolving technical questions such as: “Can we maintain ultra-low latency mobile throughput under 6G protocols?” or “Will the massive MIMO beam-forming array reliably adapt in dense urban environments?”.6

3. Technological in Nature

The research must rely fundamentally on the principles of the physical or biological sciences, engineering, or computer science.12 Given the nature of NAICS 517, most core activities—including spectrum trials, network automation using AI/ML, and hardware/software integration for satellite networks—are inherently technological and rely on applied engineering and computer science.6

4. Process of Experimentation (Process Test)

Substantially all research activities must involve a process of experimentation. This systematic process involves testing, modeling, simulating, and systematic trial and error to evaluate alternatives and resolve the technical uncertainty identified in the second test.13 Examples in telecommunications include conducting rigorous latency and throughput stress tests, field trials for new spectrum bands, and experimental modeling for interference management.6

C. Critical Exclusions and the Internal Use Software (IUS) Barrier

For the modern telecommunications industry, where innovation is heavily centered on software, the treatment of Internal Use Software (IUS) under IRC § 41(d)(4)(E) presents the most significant compliance challenge.

Software developed primarily for the taxpayer’s internal administrative, financial, or back-office functions is defined as IUS.15 To be eligible for the credit, IUS must satisfy a rigorous High Threshold of Innovation (HTI) Test, which requires meeting three demanding criteria beyond the standard Four-Part Test 15:

1. Innovative: The research must result in a reduction in cost or measurable improvement in speed or other metric that is unprecedented or exceeds a 40% improvement.
2. Significant Economic Risk: The taxpayer must demonstrate significant economic risk, evidenced by the substantial costs incurred and the technical uncertainty of the development’s success.
3. Not Commercially Available: The software must not be commercially available for the taxpayer’s use.

The complexity of this exclusion requires careful segmentation of QREs. The development of software for network optimization and management could be mischaracterized as IUS if documentation fails to emphasize its external function.

Crucially, software is not considered IUS if it is developed to be sold, leased, or licensed, or if its principal purpose is to enable interaction with third parties or allow third parties to initiate functions or review data on the taxpayer’s system.15 For a telecom firm, this exemption is vital for R&D related to customer-facing mobile applications, IoT connectivity platforms, vendor APIs, and edge computing integration designed for enterprise client access. Taxpayers must proactively segment and document these activities, clearly linking the internal development effort to the external, third-party functionality to bypass the restrictive HTI test.

IV. GADOR Guidance: Calculation, Limitations, and Use

A. Statutory Calculation Methodology

The Georgia R&D Tax Credit calculation is based on an incremental model, designed to reward increased research investment within the state.

Table: Georgia R&D Credit Calculation Components (O.C.G.A. § 48-7-40.12)

The foundation of the calculation rests on the base amount, which measures historical research spending relative to sales. Taxpayers engaged in multi-state operations must ensure the Georgia gross receipts used in the four-year preceding average are determined accurately according to state apportionment rules. The accuracy of this foundational number is essential, as an error directly impacts the resulting incremental credit calculation.

B. Credit Limitations and Carryforward Rules

1. Income Tax Liability Cap

The statute imposes a ceiling on the utilization of the credit in any single year. The credit taken “shall not exceed 50 percent of the business enterprise’s remaining Georgia net income tax liability after all other credits have been applied”.3 This limitation ensures the credit is used to reduce, but not eliminate, income tax obligations.

2. Carryforward Dynamics

The rules governing the carryforward of unused credits are subject to an important, impending legislative change.4

• Currently, any unused R&D credit may be carried forward for 10 years.4
• However, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2025, any credits generated but not used may be carried forward for only five years.4

This reduction in the carryforward period necessitates immediate strategic modeling for credit utilization. Taxpayers must proactively manage their credit portfolio, prioritizing the use of credits subject to the 10-year expiration before applying newer credits that will expire under the tighter 5-year limit.

V. Revenue Regulation 560-7-8-.42: The Payroll Withholding Offset Mechanism

Georgia offers a sophisticated mechanism to monetize R&D credits that exceed the 50% income tax liability cap, allowing for excess credits to offset state payroll withholding taxes.4 This is a crucial feature, particularly for innovative telecom companies, including startups and high-growth firms, that may incur significant QREs (high research payroll) but report low or zero taxable net income.5

A. Application of Excess Research Credits

If a company generates R&D tax credits greater than the amount allowed against the income tax liability cap, the resulting excess credit can be applied against Georgia withholding tax.4 This converts an otherwise non-refundable tax asset into a mechanism that improves company cash flow.

B. GADOR Compliance and the Letter of Eligibility

The utilization of excess credit against withholding is strictly governed by administrative procedure outlined in Revenue Regulation 560-7-8-.42.4 This offset is not automatic; it requires formal approval from the Georgia Department of Revenue (DOR):

1. The business enterprise must first file the relevant tax forms (Form IT-RD) documenting the QREs and the excess credit.4
2. The DOR reviews the claim.17
3. Upon successful review, the DOR issues a Letter of Eligibility stating the approved credit amount.17
4. The business enterprise may only begin claiming the approved tax credit amount against future withholding tax payments.
5. The regulation explicitly confirms that the DOR “will not refund any previous withholding payments”.17

The requirement for the Letter of Eligibility introduces a critical timing element. Companies must anticipate an administrative lag between filing the credit claim and receiving authorization to reduce their payroll deposits. Accurate cash flow forecasting must account for this delay.

C. Administrative Forms Requirement

To claim the R&D credit, the taxpayer must utilize the following GADOR forms:

• Form IT-RD (Research Tax Credit): The primary form used to calculate and document the credit.4
• Form IT-IC (Income Tax Credit Summary): Used by corporate taxpayers to summarize all applied credits.2
• Form IT-APP (Application): GADOR instructions require that Form IT-IC be accompanied by the approved Form IT-APP.2 This application process often verifies the business’s classification and facility presence in Georgia, requiring administrative consistency across all state incentive claims.

VI. Illustrative Example: Application and Utilization for a Wireless Carrier

To illustrate the integration of federal standards and state utilization rules, consider a Wireless Telecommunications Carrier (NAICS 5172) developing an advanced Network Automation and AI/ML system in Georgia.

A. Project Scenario and Technical Qualification

The carrier is developing an experimental AI/ML platform to optimize network routing and integrate edge-compute functions designed to manage unpredictable burst traffic from external IoT enterprise clients.6

The project satisfies the IRC § 41 Four-Part Test:

• Permitted Purpose: The goal is to improve the network’s reliability, quality, and performance via algorithmic control, developing a new business component (the AI/ML architecture).6
• Elimination of Uncertainty: Technical uncertainty exists regarding whether the proprietary AI model can reliably route massive, decentralized data streams from IoT devices while maintaining specific latency guarantees for the new edge functionality.6
• Technological in Nature: The activities rely fundamentally on complex computer science (advanced AI algorithms) and engineering (network architecture and protocols).13
• Process of Experimentation: Engineers conduct systematic testing through network simulations, stress-testing the AI models against various traffic scenarios, and running live network trials to refine algorithms and resolve performance shortcomings.6

B. Internal Use Software Defense

Crucially, although the AI/ML platform manages the carrier’s internal network resources, its primary purpose is to enable third-party enterprise clients to deploy applications on the edge-compute nodes and initiate functions (e.g., real-time data processing).15 Because the improved software is designed to interact with and allow functions by third parties, it is exempt from the demanding High Threshold of Innovation test that applies to purely internal use software.15 This proactive identification of the third-party interaction component is essential for successfully defending the QREs related to the software development.

C. Calculation and Utilization Flow

Assume the following financial data for the Georgia carrier in Tax Year 2024:

1. Base Amount Determination

The Base Amount is calculated using the Georgia gross receipts average:

$$\text{Base Amount} = 5.0\% \times \$200,000,000 = \$10,000,000$$

2. Incremental Credit Calculation

The Excess QREs are those above the base amount:

$$\text{Excess QREs} = \$18,000,000 – \$10,000,000 = \$8,000,000$$

$$\text{Georgia R\&D Credit} = 10\% \times \$8,000,000 = \$800,000$$

3. Application Against Income Tax

The maximum credit usable against income tax is 50% of the liability:

$$\text{Maximum Usable Credit} = 50\% \times \$4,000,000 = \$2,000,000$$

Since the calculated credit ($\$800,000$) is less than the cap ($\$2,000,000$), the full $\$800,000$ reduces the income tax liability.

4. Excess Credit and Withholding Offset

In this instance, no credit remains unused. However, if the company had generated a credit of $\$3,000,000$, only $\$2,000,000$ would be used against income tax. The remaining $\$1,000,000$ would be designated as excess credit, eligible to offset state payroll withholding once the Letter of Eligibility is issued by GADOR.4 This illustrates the strategic value for companies in high-investment, low-profit phases where the R&D credit functions essentially as a payroll subsidy.

VII. Comprehensive GADOR Compliance and Reporting Procedures

A. Detailed Filing Requirements

To finalize the claim, the NAICS 517 enterprise must follow a standardized GADOR reporting process. The required submissions include filing Form IT-RD to establish the QREs and credit amount.4 This must then be summarized on Form IT-IC, which must be accompanied by the approved Form IT-APP.2 The requirement for the approved IT-APP, a form often linked to investment tax incentives, mandates that the taxpayer ensure administrative consistency across all state tax filings concerning their operational presence and industry designation (telecommunications facility or support facility).

B. Documentation Requirements for Audit Defense

Successful defense of the Georgia credit depends entirely on robust documentation supporting the underlying federal QREs. Taxpayers must compile three categories of records:

1. Financial Documentation: Detailed expense ledgers tracking wages, supplies, and contract research expenses, segregated by qualifying R&D projects.11 These records must demonstrate that QREs were paid or incurred for research conducted within Georgia.2
2. Personnel Documentation: Detailed time-tracking records that specifically attribute employee time (for engineers, researchers, and technical staff) to qualifying research activities, distinguishing between billable R&D time and non-qualifying management or routine maintenance activities.12
3. Technical Documentation: Project documentation (including engineering notebooks, failed prototype reports, and test results) that clearly demonstrates satisfaction of the Four-Part Test. For software development, explicit technical memoranda are required to address the primary purpose of the software, proving the necessary linkage to third-party interaction to avoid the IUS exclusion.15

C. Administrative Finality and Withholding Offset Procedures

The approval to use excess credit against withholding, provided via the Letter of Eligibility, is critical for cash flow. Taxpayers must recognize that GADOR reserves the right to review the substantive research credit calculation upon audit. If the underlying R&D claim is subsequently reduced, any corresponding withholding offset claimed by the taxpayer may be subject to adjustment and recovery by the state.17 Therefore, procedural compliance in securing the Letter of Eligibility must be paired with continuous substantive compliance to safeguard the benefit.

VIII. Conclusion and Recommendations

The Georgia R&D Tax Credit provides an exceptional mechanism for NAICS 517 (Telecommunications) companies to reduce tax liability and improve cash position through the unique payroll withholding offset. The benefit, calculated as 10% of incremental Georgia QREs, is entirely dependent upon rigorous adherence to federal IRC § 41 standards.

Telecommunications enterprises should adopt the following strategic tax planning directives:

1. Prioritize Federal Compliance: Conduct a thorough, audit-ready federal R&D study, ensuring every research project satisfies all elements of the Four-Part Test (Permitted Purpose, Elimination of Uncertainty, Technological in Nature, and Process of Experimentation).
2. Mitigate IUS Risk: Proactively classify all software R&D. Isolate and document the “third-party interaction” component of platform development (e.g., IoT edge computing interfaces, customer data access tools) to exempt the majority of QREs from the restrictive High Threshold of Innovation Test.
3. Ensure State Financial Accuracy: Maintain precise records to calculate Georgia gross receipts accurately for the base amount determination, as this figure is state-specific and differs from the federal definition.
4. Manage Credit Expiration: Model the utilization schedule carefully, recognizing the shift in the carryforward period from ten years to five years starting in 2025.4
5. Secure Administrative Authorization: For any excess credit intended for payroll offset, immediately apply for and secure the Letter of Eligibility from the GADOR, as this is the mandatory precursor to utilizing the credit against future withholding payments.17

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/