Decoding the Hawaii R&D Tax Credit: A Deep Dive into the ‘More Than 50% Activities’ Requirement for Qualified High Technology Business Status

I. Executive Summary: The Gateway to Hawaii’s Refundable R&D Tax Credit

The “Activities in Qualified Research (> 50%)” rule is the statutory prerequisite for a small business to qualify as a Qualified High Technology Business (QHTB) in Hawaii. Achieving QHTB status is the mandatory gateway to accessing the state’s valuable, refundable Tax Credit for Research Activities (TCRA) under Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) §235-110.91.

This requirement mandates that a majority of a company’s total business efforts, typically measured using the Cost Method (labor costs) or the Time Method (employee hours) as supported by administrative guidance, must be demonstrably dedicated to defined qualified research activities conducted within the state. Meticulous documentation of time allocation is therefore not merely a compliance measure, but a prerequisite for securing the credit against the highly competitive $5 million annual cap.

II. The Qualified High Technology Business (QHTB) Status: Foundation of Eligibility

The Hawaii Tax Credit for Research Activities (TCRA) under HRS §235-110.91 provides a robust financial incentive for technological growth within the islands, offering a refundable credit that aligns with the federal R&D credit provisions of IRC §41.1 However, access to this credit is not universal; it is strictly limited to those taxpayers certified as a Qualified High Technology Business (QHTB).1 This limitation serves to focus the state’s investment on firms genuinely dedicated to innovation and technological advancement within Hawaii.2

A. HRS §235-7.3: Defining the Qualified High Technology Business

The central element of eligibility is the QHTB definition, codified in HRS §235-7.3.3 The statute establishes the core requirement that a business must conduct “more than fifty per cent of its activities in qualified research”.1 This mandate is often referred to as the 50% Activities Test.

This $50\%$ threshold represents a specific policy decision by the Hawaii Legislature. If the statute merely required a business to incur Qualified Research Expenses (QREs), as the federal credit largely does, non-R&D-focused companies (e.g., those primarily engaged in sales or manufacturing with minor R&D departments) could potentially claim a substantial, refundable credit. By imposing the 50% Activities Test, the legislature explicitly ensures that the refundable credit, which carries a direct cash flow benefit, is reserved for entities whose foundational and primary operational focus is research and development.2 This criterion effectively screens applicants to prioritize those firms whose existence and resource allocation are intrinsically defined by their commitment to technological innovation, thereby optimizing the economic impact of the limited credit resources.

B. Formalizing the “Small Business” Constraint (Act 139, SLH 2024)

In 2024, Act 139 updated the definition of a QHTB, further refining the scope of eligible businesses.6 This legislative change introduced a size constraint, narrowing the focus of the incentive.

The amendment formally redefined a QHTB as a “small business” that meets the $>50\%$ activities requirement.6 For the purposes of the TCRA, a small business is defined as a company that has no more than five hundred (500) employees.1 This employee limitation, combined with the stipulation that the company must be registered to do business in the state of Hawaii, ensures the credit benefits smaller, R&D-intensive firms operating locally.1

C. Defining Qualified Research (QR) Activities

To measure the $>50\%$ threshold, the business activities must first meet the statutory definition of “Qualified Research.” Hawaii adopts a definition that begins with federal alignment but includes significant state-specific expansions tailored to its economic development goals.1

Hawaii’s definition of “Qualified Research” means:

1. Federal Alignment: The activity must satisfy the definition provided in section 41(d) of the Internal Revenue Code.1 This inherently incorporates the federal Four-Part Test, which requires activities to be conducted to eliminate technical uncertainty, be technological in nature, involve a process of experimentation, and be intended for use in developing a new or improved business product or process.10
2. State Expansion (High-Technology Fields): Recognizing its unique high-technology sectors, Hawaii expands the definition to explicitly include certain fields, thus clarifying eligibility for local innovators.1 These expanded areas include:

• The development and design of computer software intended for ultimate commercial marketing (sale, lease, or license), provided the business retains substantial control and intellectual property rights.1
• Biotechnology.1
• Performing arts products.1
• Sensor and optic technologies.1
• Ocean sciences and astronomy.1
• Non-fossil fuel energy-related technology.1

A business attempting to satisfy the 50% Activities Test must ensure that the activities constituting the numerator of their calculation fall squarely within either the IRC §41 definition or one of Hawaii’s specific high-tech expansions.

III. Regulatory Interpretation: Quantifying the 50% “Activities” Threshold

While the $50\%$ requirement is clear statutorily, the critical challenge for tax compliance professionals lies in the interpretation of the term “activities” itself. HRS §235-7.3 does not explicitly define “activities” using a standardized metric, such as gross receipts, total expenses, or employee time.

A. The Absence of Codified Formula and Administrative Reliance

Current instructions and forms related to the TCRA, such as Form N-346A, confirm the QHTB definition but acknowledge that they do not provide a specific calculation or formula for determining “more than 50 percent of its activities”.6 This administrative gap requires taxpayers to rely on methodologies previously accepted by the Hawaii Department of Taxation (DoTax) through historical guidance, specifically Letter Rulings (Ltr Ruls) and Tax Information Releases (TIRs).3

The established practice, confirmed in historic rulings, defines the QHTB status using an “Activity Test”.12 While some rulings related to older versions of the law also included a Gross Income Test, the core focus has consistently been on quantifying the operational activities themselves. These historical administrative documents serve as precedent, demonstrating the metrics that DoTax found acceptable for verifying a company’s primary operational focus.

B. DoTax Guidance: The Measurable Metrics (Cost vs. Time)

Administrative guidance has shown a strong preference for using labor metrics to quantify the 50% Activities Test, as labor is generally the most direct measure of operational effort and resource allocation within a technology company. A Letter Ruling from the DoTax explicitly stated that if a company chose a method “other than the Cost Method (i.e., time spent on qualified activities), the same analysis would apply”.12 This language establishes two principal, accepted methodologies:

1. Labor Cost Allocation (Cost Method): This involves comparing the total employee salary and wage expenses dedicated to performing, supervising, or directly supporting QR activities against the total employee salary and wage expenses for all business operations (including G&A, Sales, Marketing, etc.).1 This is often the most practical method, as payroll data is readily available and audited.
2. Employee Time Allocation (Time Method): This involves comparing the total employee hours dedicated to QR activities against the total employee working hours for the company.12

The necessity of relying on labor metrics flows from the inherent purpose of the statute. Since the legislative objective is to ensure that a QHTB’s core mission is R&D, the most robust way to demonstrate this commitment is through the allocation of the company’s most valuable and measurable resource: its personnel. The total salaries and wages paid to employees engaged in QR activities thus becomes the most defensible numerator against the total salaries and wages paid to all employees (the denominator), demonstrating the dominant activity of the business.

C. Compliance Documentation and Hawaii Sourcing

To substantiate the calculation, comprehensive documentation is non-negotiable. Businesses must implement rigorous, contemporaneous time-tracking systems that accurately log employee hours dedicated to both qualified research (QR) and non-qualified activities (Non-QR).1

Furthermore, while the 50% Activities Test assesses the proportion of R&D within the entire company’s operation, it is important to remember the geographical component of QHTB status. Historically, DoTax guidance reinforced that not only must more than $50\%$ of activities be qualified research, but also that a significant portion (such as the $75\%$ threshold mentioned in older rulings) of the qualified research must occur physically in Hawaii.12 While the recent Act 139 defining QHTB focuses primarily on the $>50\%$ activity conducted in Hawaii 6, the requirement that research expenses claimed for the credit must be attributable to research activities performed in Hawaii is absolute.1 Therefore, all time tracking and cost allocation must clearly delineate in-state activities from those conducted out-of-state.

IV. DBEDT Certification and the Competitive Landscape

Achieving QHTB status, including satisfying the $50\%$ Activities Test, is only the first hurdle. The second, and perhaps most time-sensitive, challenge is navigating the certification process administered by the Department of Business, Economic Development, and Tourism (DBEDT).7

A. The Mandatory Certification Process

Eligibility for the TCRA is predicated upon receiving formal certification from DBEDT.1 Taxpayers must submit Form N-346A (Application for Certification of Tax Credit for Research Activities).7 DBEDT is responsible for reviewing and verifying the information submitted in the N-346A application, including the data supporting the claim that the company conducts more than $50\%$ of its activities in qualified research.8 Once verified and accepted, DBEDT returns an approved certificate to the taxpayer, who then files it with the Department of Taxation (DoTax) alongside their tax return.8

B. Navigating the $5 Million Annual Aggregate Cap

The strategic importance of meticulous pre-application compliance for the $50\%$ Activities Test is dramatically amplified by the severe limitations on the total credit pool.

The TCRA operates under an annual aggregate cap: the maximum total credit available statewide is limited to $5 million per calendar year.1 This limited pool of funds is allocated on a strictly first-come, first-served basis.1

The competitive nature of this cap creates an intense bottleneck for applicants. For the past several years, evidence suggests the cap has been reached “almost as soon as the online applications were opened”.8 The official application date and time, based on the receipt of the completed and signed N-346A form, dictates the applicant’s priority.8

This competitive environment necessitates that documentation supporting QHTB status—specifically the calculation verifying the $>50\%$ Activities Test—be flawless and fully prepared well in advance of the application window. If DBEDT reviews the application and finds the evidence supporting the 50% threshold to be vague, incomplete, or requiring extensive clarification, the review process will be delayed. Any such delay in verification and certification will inevitably push the application timeline past the point at which the $5 million aggregate cap has been exhausted. Therefore, the successful quantification of the $50\%$ activities test is not merely a technical compliance task, but a crucial element of a competitive strategy for securing the cash benefit.

V. Practical Application and Quantification Example

To illustrate the compliance requirements, the analysis applies the established Labor Cost Allocation Method (Cost Method), which uses employee salaries and wages as the quantifiable proxy for total business activity.

A. Scenario Setup: Hawaii-Based Software Development Firm

Company Profile: A technology firm, ‘Kona Code LLC,’ registered to do business in Hawaii and employing fewer than 500 individuals, specializing in the design and development of computer software for commercial licensing—a defined category of qualified research.1 The company’s total labor expenses for the tax year are $1,800,000.

Total Annual Labor Costs (Denominator): $1,800,000

B. Detailed Calculation of the 50% Threshold

The objective is to determine what percentage of the total labor cost (activities) is attributable to Qualified Research (QR) activities conducted in Hawaii.

Table 1: Labor Cost Allocation for 50% Activities Test

C. Conclusion of Example: Demonstrating Compliance

The QR Activity Percentage is calculated by comparing the labor costs directly related to qualified research activities (Numerator) against the total company labor costs (Denominator):

$$\text{QR Activity Percentage} = \frac{\text{Total QR Activity Costs}}{\text{Total Company Labor Costs}} = \frac{\$1,100,000}{\$1,800,000} \approx 0.6111 \text{ or } 61.11\%$$

Compliance Result: Since $61.11\%$ is demonstrably more than $50\%$, Kona Code LLC satisfies the QHTB Activities Test. This successful quantification allows the company to move forward with the mandatory DBEDT certification application (Form N-346A).

VI. TCRA Mechanics: Calculating the Credit Post-Qualification

Once certified as a QHTB, the taxpayer proceeds to calculate the monetary amount of the refundable credit by aligning Hawaii-sourced Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) with the federal R&D tax credit framework.

A. Linking State and Federal Credits: The Pro-Rata Formula

The Hawaii TCRA is calculated as a pro-rata share of the federal credit determined under IRC §41.1 This approach ensures that the state only rewards research investment proportionally to the QREs physically incurred within Hawaii.1

The calculation steps are as follows:

1. Calculate Federal Credit: The business must first compute the total federal R&D credit amount from federal Form 6765, applying either the regular or the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) method.1
2. Determine Hawaii QREs: Identify all Qualified Research Expenses (QREs)—wages, supplies, and 65% of contract research costs—that were paid or incurred for research activities conducted specifically in Hawaii.1
3. Calculate Proration Ratio (Percentage of Eligible Expenses Attributable to Hawaii): The ratio is determined by dividing the Hawaii-sourced QREs by the total QREs claimed federally.1

$$\text{Ratio} = \frac{\text{Eligible Research Expenses IN HAWAII}}{\text{Total Eligible Research Expenses Reported On Federal Form 6765}}$$

1. Determine Hawaii TCRA: The tentative Hawaii credit is the result of multiplying the Federal Credit by the calculated Ratio.6

$$\text{Hawaii TCRA} = \text{Federal Credit} \times \text{Ratio}$$

B. Impact of Act 139: Mandatory Application of the Federal Base Amount

The calculation methodology underwent a significant legislative change with the passage of Act 139 (2024), affecting taxable years beginning after December 31, 2023.6

Previously, the Hawaii statute contained a provision that made the complex federal base amount calculation inapplicable, essentially allowing a credit on all Hawaii-sourced QREs, regardless of previous spending.6 Act 139 repealed this provision.6

As a result, the federal base amount calculation under IRC §41 is now mandatory for determining the Hawaii credit.6 The federal credit, and thus the resulting prorated Hawaii credit, is generally calculated as an incremental amount—only QREs that exceed a predetermined historical average (the base amount) qualify for the credit.1

This reinstatement fundamentally alters the economics of the TCRA for established firms. Previously, QHTBs benefited from a superior, non-incremental credit calculation. Under the updated law, the credit is now restricted to rewarding increases in research spending above the base. While this affects mature companies, startups may still benefit from the federal fixed-base percentage phase-in rules, starting at a potentially favorable $3\%$ rate.1 This change solidifies the alignment between the Hawaii TCRA and the incremental nature of the federal incentive.

C. Refundability and Program Duration

A key feature maintaining the high demand for the TCRA is its refundability.1 If the amount of the tax credit exceeds the taxpayer’s net income tax liability for the taxable year, the excess is paid to the taxpayer as a cash refund.1 This feature provides substantial benefit to high-growth, early-stage QHTBs that often incur large R&D expenses while generating limited or no taxable income.

In terms of duration, Act 139 extended the program’s sunset date. The Tax Credit for Research Activities is currently scheduled to be repealed from statute on December 31, 2029.1

VII. Strategic Recommendations and Conclusion

The Hawaii Tax Credit for Research Activities remains a crucial economic development tool, but its restrictive eligibility and intensely competitive allocation process demand exceptional planning and documentation. The foundational requirement of establishing Qualified High Technology Business (QHTB) status via the “more than 50% of activities in qualified research” test is the initial, non-negotiable compliance hurdle.

A. Strategic Imperatives for QHTB Compliance

The successful acquisition of the TCRA hinges on the timely and accurate demonstration of QHTB status, primarily through the 50% Activities Test. Taxpayers must implement the following strategic measures:

1. Adopt and Defend a Quantification Methodology: Given the absence of a formula in current forms 6, the business must proactively choose and rigorously apply a labor-based metric (either Cost Allocation or Time Allocation) consistent with historical DoTax administrative guidance.12 This approach is the most defensible method for demonstrating that R&D constitutes the majority of the firm’s operational effort.
2. Comprehensive Labor Documentation: Documentation cannot be limited only to QRE-generating personnel. The measurement requires tracking the activities of all employees across all functions (R&D, G&A, Sales, Marketing) to accurately calculate the total activities denominator. Failure to track non-qualified activities adequately weakens the entire calculation supporting the $50\%$ claim.
3. Prioritize Pre-Application Readiness: The competitive environment, marked by the rapid exhaustion of the $5 million annual cap 8, mandates that all QHTB documentation, including the verification of the 50% Activities Test, must be complete and ready for submission well before the application period opens (typically in early March). Any deficiency that requires subsequent clarification or review by DBEDT will likely result in the firm missing the first-come, first-served allocation window.1

B. Conclusion

The Hawaii TCRA is strategically structured to reserve its refundable benefits for small businesses ($\le 500$ employees) whose core mission is innovation, enforced by the requirement that over half of their total activities must be dedicated to qualified research. While the credit calculation has become more complex due to the 2024 reinstatement of the incremental federal base amount, the immediate challenge remains overcoming the administrative bottleneck created by the strict annual cap. For eligible high-technology businesses, meticulous, labor-based documentation of the $50\%$ Activities Test is the critical step that determines the difference between theoretical eligibility and successful cash realization of this valuable state incentive.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/