The Hawaii R&D Tax Credit Annual Aggregate Cap: Navigating the $5,000,000 First-Come, First-Served Limitation

The Annual Aggregate Cap for the Hawaii Tax Credit for Research Activities (TCRA) is currently fixed at $5,000,000 for all claimants combined each calendar year, allocated strictly on a competitive first-come, first-served basis.1 This stringent limitation governs the annual availability of the refundable credit, demanding rapid administrative compliance from Qualified High Technology Businesses (QHTBs) seeking to realize this incentive.

I. Statutory Foundation and the Critical Role of the Aggregate Cap

The Hawaii Tax Credit for Research Activities, established under Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) §235-110.91, is designed to fuel innovation, particularly within sectors like biotechnology, software development, and ocean sciences, through a refundable credit mechanism.1 Understanding the statutory framework, particularly the limitations imposed by the aggregate cap, is essential for strategic compliance planning.

A. Core Eligibility Requirements and Program Parameters

To be eligible for the TCRA, businesses must adhere to specific structural and operational requirements, primarily targeted at fostering growth in the high-tech sector:

1. QHTB Status: The claimant must be designated a Qualified High Technology Business (QHTB).4 Key prerequisites include conducting more than 50% of the company’s activities in qualified research within Hawaii and registering to do business in the state.1
2. Size Restriction: QHTBs are subject to a strict size limitation, requiring them to have no more than 500 employees.1
3. Credit Structure and Duration: The TCRA is a refundable credit, meaning that any portion of the certified credit that exceeds the QHTB’s income tax liability is paid out in cash.1 This structure provides substantial liquidity and makes the incentive highly attractive, particularly to early-stage or pre-revenue firms. The credit, extended via Act 139 (2024), remains available for tax years beginning through December 31, 2029.1

B. The $5,000,000 Annual Aggregate Cap

The most defining constraint of the TCRA program is the fixed annual limit of $5,000,000 on the total amount of credits certified across all eligible QHTBs.2

This cap creates an intensely competitive environment. Testimony and reports from the Department of Business, Economic Development, and Tourism (DBEDT) indicate that the $5,000,000 limit has been reached “almost as soon as the online applications were opened” for several preceding years.5 This rapid exhaustion of funds demonstrates strong market demand for the credit but simultaneously signals a substantial risk for businesses that fail to submit their certification applications at the earliest possible moment.

C. Context of Alternative Cap Amounts ($10M or $15M)

The reference to higher caps, such as $10,000,000, stems from recent legislative efforts aimed at addressing the persistent issue of immediate cap exhaustion. Legislative measures, such as proposed bills in the 2024 session (e.g., HB1957), sought to substantially increase the annual aggregate cap, with proposals ranging up to $15,000,000.6 Such proposals were often coupled with the introduction of an individual cap, such as $2,500,000 per taxpayer, intended to broaden the distribution of funds.7

However, the analysis of current guidance confirms that these proposed increases were not enacted. The current enacted statute, including updates from Act 139 (2024), retains the $5,000,000 aggregate cap.1 The continued low cap, despite clear legislative acknowledgment of its inadequacy, establishes a significant friction point in state economic policy. While the refundable nature of the credit makes it powerful, the limited allocation pool and permanent forfeiture risk (due to lack of carryforward 8) may lead larger QHTBs with substantial qualified expenses to mitigate risk by prioritizing R&D investment in states with uncapped or more generous incentives.9

II. State Revenue Office Guidance and the FCFS Compliance Race

The administration of the TCRA is a cooperative effort between the Department of Business, Economic Development, and Tourism (DBEDT) and the Department of Taxation (DOTAX). DBEDT acts as the allocation gatekeeper, while DOTAX administers the credit claim on the income tax return.

A. DBEDT’s Certification Process and Allocation Priority

DBEDT is responsible for certifying the credits and enforcing the “first-come, first-served” (FCFS) rule against the $5,000,000 aggregate cap.2

The taxpayer must submit an application to DBEDT by March 31 following the taxable year in which the research was conducted.2 The cornerstone of this process is the Form N-346A, Certified Statement of Research and Development Costs Incurred By a Qualified High Technology Business.5 DBEDT guidance states that the critical determination for allocation priority—the first-come timestamp—is the date and time a completed and signed Form N-346A is received by DBEDT.5

Since the cap is historically exhausted immediately, the application process is transformed from a filing deadline into a high-speed competition. DBEDT will continue to certify claims based on this timestamp until the cumulative amount of credits certified reaches the $5,000,000 limit.2 Once certified, DBEDT issues the signed N-346A, which is proof of allocation necessary for the final tax filing.2 Public guidance does not specify the mechanism by which businesses are notified if their timely, but slightly later, application is rejected because the aggregate cap has been met.5

B. DOTAX Requirements and Mandatory Compliance

Once DBEDT has certified the credit via the signed N-346A, the Department of Taxation (DOTAX) takes over for the final claim process. Taxpayers must include the signed Form N-346A, along with Hawaii Form N-346 (Tax Credit for Research Activities) and the Federal Form 6765, with their applicable Hawaii income tax return (e.g., Form N-11, N-20, or N-35).2

Crucially, QHTBs face a secondary compliance hurdle separate from the FCFS race. All certified QHTBs must file an Annual Compliance Survey detailing their expenditures and credits claimed by June 30 of the following year.1 This survey provides data to DBEDT and DOTAX regarding the program’s effectiveness, including information on job creation, compensation levels, and external services procured.11 The failure to complete and submit this June 30 compliance questionnaire results in the disallowance of the claimed credits, even if the business successfully secured an allocation under the $5 million cap in March.2 This necessitates a strategy that prioritizes both administrative speed and meticulous, ongoing data reporting.

Table 1: Hawaii TCRA Annual Compliance Timeline and Agency Responsibilities

III. TCRA Calculation Mechanics: The Impact of IRC §41 Reinstatement

The value of the Hawaii TCRA is determined by reference to the federal R&D tax credit defined in Internal Revenue Code (IRC) §41. A significant statutory update occurred in 2024 through Act 139, which materially alters the calculation for many businesses.

A. Formula for Credit Determination

The Hawaii credit amount is calculated by first determining the federal credit the QHTB would receive on Form 6765, and then multiplying that amount by the ratio of Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) incurred in Hawaii to the QHTB’s total QREs nationwide.2

$$\text{Hawaii TCRA} = \text{Federal Credit (Form 6765)} \times \left( \frac{\text{Hawaii QREs}}{\text{Total Federal QREs}} \right)$$

B. The Reinstatement of the Base Amount (Act 139, 2024)

Historically, Hawaii law allowed QHTBs to disregard the “base amount” calculation required under IRC §41(c), meaning all qualified research expenses could be taken without reference to previous years’ expenditures.13 This provided a generous benefit, particularly for established companies.

However, Act 139 (2024) reversed this provision.1 The updated statute now mandates that the federal base amount in section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code will apply.5 This means the Hawaii credit is no longer based on 20% of all Hawaii QREs but only on the incremental increase in qualified research activity.

To determine the incremental credit, the federal computation requires calculating the base amount, which is generally the greater of:

1. The fixed-base percentage multiplied by the average annual gross receipts for the four preceding tax years; or
2. 50% of the current year’s QREs.1

Only the QREs that exceed this base amount—known as Federal Excess QREs—qualify for the initial 20% federal credit calculation.1 For businesses with relatively consistent research expenditures, the application of this base amount substantially reduces the size of the final calculated credit.1 This increases the technical complexity of the claim preparation, as firms must precisely track multiple years of financial data (gross receipts and QREs) to determine the qualifying incremental expenditure, all while facing the pressure of instantaneous FCFS submission.

IV. Example: Calculation and The Implication of Aggregate Cap Failure

The following example illustrates the calculation of the TCRA under the current incremental methodology and demonstrates the financial consequence of failing to secure an allocation under the competitive $5,000,000 cap.

A. Scenario: Aloha Innovations LLC (AI)

Aloha Innovations LLC (AI) is a QHTB operating in Hawaii. For the 2024 tax year, AI incurred R&D expenses and has the following historical metrics:

B. Step-by-Step Calculation of TCRA Claim

Because AI conducts 100% of its QREs in Hawaii, the allocation ratio is 100%. However, the base amount calculation still limits the amount of QREs eligible for the credit.

Table 2: Calculation of TCRA for Aloha Innovations LLC (AI)

AI’s preliminary credit claim is $350,000. This claim must now be certified by DBEDT.

C. Financial Consequences of Cap Exhaustion

If AI submits its finalized N-346A form at the exact moment the application window opens, and the total previously certified credits for the year stand at $4,800,000, AI’s full $350,000 claim is certified, and the cap is successfully utilized.

However, if AI’s submission is delayed by just a few seconds, and other QHTBs successfully file claims totaling $4,900,000 before AI’s submission is timestamped, the outcome is financially detrimental:

1. Remaining Cap: Only $100,000 ($5,000,000 – $4,900,000) remains available under the aggregate cap.
2. Certification: DBEDT will only certify the remaining amount, or may halt certification entirely, depending on the exact sequence of receipts and rounding rules for the final claim.2 Assuming the state certifies only up to the limit, AI’s claim is effectively capped at $100,000.
3. Permanent Loss: The disallowed portion of the claim, $250,000 ($350,000 – $100,000), cannot be carried forward to offset future tax liabilities.8 Because the Hawaii TCRA lacks a carryforward provision, this unrealized benefit represents a permanent loss of state incentive funding. This lack of a safety net means that a minor administrative delay transforms into a substantial financial write-off.

V. Conclusion and Strategic Takeaways

The $5,000,000 Annual Aggregate Cap for the Hawaii Tax Credit for Research Activities fundamentally defines the risks and rewards of participation in the program. While the refundable nature of the credit makes it highly valuable, the severe capacity constraints and the competitive FCFS allocation method require QHTBs to adopt an aggressive, precision-focused compliance strategy.

A. Critical Strategic Imperatives

• Zero-Tolerance for Delay: QHTBs cannot treat the March 31 date as a conventional deadline. Due to the high demand and instantaneous exhaustion of the cap, the success of the claim is dependent on the precise time of submission of the completed and signed Form N-346A to DBEDT. Companies must prioritize administrative readiness well in advance of the application window opening.
• Modeling Under Incremental Rules: Following Act 139 (2024), QHTBs must ensure their claims reflect the complex calculation mandated by the reinstatement of the IRC §41 base amount. Relying on older methodologies that disregard the base amount will lead to an inflated claim amount and potential compliance issues, even if the cap is secured.
• Mitigation of Forfeiture Risk: Given the non-carryforward status of the credit, QHTBs should incorporate the risk of cap exhaustion into their annual financial planning. The $5 million capacity is insufficient for the market demand, and relying on the TCRA as guaranteed cash flow presents a significant business risk.
• Mandatory Ongoing Compliance: Securing the initial allocation via FCFS only addresses the Cap Risk. Companies must maintain a clear administrative path to submit the mandatory Annual Compliance Survey to DBEDT by the June 30 deadline to prevent the final disallowance of their certified credits.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/