The Critical March 31st Deadline: Strategic Compliance and Allocation for the Hawaii R&D Tax Credit

The March 31st deadline is the mandatory annual submission date for the written, certified statement (Form N-346A) detailing prior-year research expenditures to the Department of Business, Economic Development, and Tourism (DBEDT).1 Meeting this critical deadline is essential because the state’s $\$5$ million aggregate credit cap is allocated strictly on a first-come, first-served (FCFS) basis, directly linking submission timing to the realization of the refundable tax credit.2

The Strategic Imperative for Qualified High Technology Businesses (QHTBs)

While the Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) §235-110.91 specifies March 31st as the official cutoff, this date functions as the final statutory limit, not a strategic target. The Tax Credit for Research Activities (TCRA) is subject to an annual aggregate cap of $\$5$ million for all taxpayers.2 Historical data confirms that demand for the refundable credit routinely exceeds this cap, often exhausting the available funding almost immediately when the application window opens in early March.2 Consequently, successful applicants must prioritize the completion and submission of their certification package at the earliest possible moment within the filing window to secure an allocation timestamp that guarantees funding, recognizing that the statutory March 31st date represents an effective denial for late filers once the FCFS cap is reached.2

Overview of HRS §235-110.91 and Legislative Changes

The Hawaii TCRA, codified under HRS §235-110.91, provides a refundable income tax credit for Qualified High Technology Businesses (QHTBs) conducting research activities within the state.2 This credit is set to expire for tax years beginning after December 31, 2029.2 The credit amount is fundamentally linked to the federal credit for increasing research activities provided by Section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC).2

Recent legislative actions, specifically Act 139 (2024), introduced significant complexity by amending the rules for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2023.6 Previously, Hawaii allowed credits for all qualified research expenses without regard to prior-year spending. However, the new law reinstates the federal requirement that the complex base amount calculation found in IRC §41 must now apply to the state credit.2 This change mandates enhanced technical precision in calculating the credit before the March filing window opens.

Statutory and Administrative Framework of the TCRA

The framework for the Hawaii R&D credit involves strict eligibility criteria, a finite budget, and collaboration between two primary state agencies: the Department of Business, Economic Development, and Tourism (DBEDT) for certification and the Department of Taxation (DOTAX) for credit allowance and refunds.

Defining the Qualified High Technology Business (QHTB)

To participate in the program, a business must meet the strict definition of a QHTB as articulated in the statute.7 The statutory criteria require the business to be registered to do business in Hawaii and adhere to two specific requirements:

1. Employee Limit: The QHTB must qualify as a “small business,” defined as a company having no more than five hundred employees.2
2. Activity Threshold: The business must conduct more than fifty percent of its activities in qualified research within the State of Hawaii.2

The complexity embedded in these requirements requires continuous monitoring by applicants. The mandatory QHTB criteria represent preliminary compliance hurdles separate from the pressure of the March 31st deadline. Review of historical application cycles demonstrates that technical disqualifications are common. For instance, in one recent tax year, five QHTBs were disqualified for various reasons, including one that exceeded the 500-employee limit and two that failed to conduct over 50% of their research activities in Hawaii.8 This outcome emphasizes that the speed of application submission is moot if the underlying eligibility criteria are not met for the prior taxable year. Businesses must conduct thorough, pre-filing diligence to confirm compliance with the QHTB definition to prevent wasting time and resources on a disallowed claim.

Key Program Parameters and Financial Structure

The structure of the TCRA makes it a highly desirable incentive, despite the inherent competition for funding.

Refundable Credit Status

The Hawaii TCRA is a refundable income tax credit.2 This feature is significant because if the credit amount certified by DBEDT exceeds the taxpayer’s net income tax liability for that year, the state refunds the excess amount to the taxpayer.

The $5 Million Annual Aggregate Cap

The cornerstone of the application process urgency is the $\$5$ million annual aggregate cap on the total amount of certified tax credits.2 The law mandates that DBEDT certifications be provided on a FCFS basis until this cap is fully reached.2 This competitive structure forces QHTBs to prioritize submission speed above almost all other administrative requirements during the application window.

Treatment of Pass-Through Entities

The credit mechanism accommodates flow-through entities, such as partnerships, S corporations, estates, and trusts.6 For these entities, the credit is calculated at the entity level but passed through to the partners, shareholders, or beneficiaries, allowing them to apply the benefits against their personal income tax liability on a pro-rata basis via Schedule K-1.6

The Significance of March 31st: Mandatory Certification Filing

The March 31st deadline is the administrative inflection point for claiming the TCRA. It governs the relationship between the QHTB and the certification authority (DBEDT), and failure to comply by this date severely jeopardizes any claim for the credit.

The Legal Mandate and Agency Roles

The legal requirement for the March 31st filing is established in HRS §235-110.91(d). The statute explicitly requires that “Every qualified high technology business, before March 31 of each year in which qualified research and development activity was conducted in the previous taxable year,” shall submit a written, certified statement to the DBEDT.1

The submission of this statement, Form N-346A (Certified Statement of Research and Development Costs Incurred by a QHTB and Claim of the Tax Credit for Research Activities), serves two critical purposes:

1. Identification: It identifies the qualified expenditures expended in the previous taxable year and the amount of tax credits claimed.1
2. Certification Request: It allows the QHTB to request the certificate necessary for itself, or its partners/shareholders, to attach to their final Hawaii income tax return.6

The DBEDT plays the pivotal verification role, tasked with reviewing the nature of the research activity, verifying the amount of qualified costs, totaling the expenditures, and ultimately certifying the amount of the tax credit.1 Upon certification, DBEDT issues a signed Part II of Form N-346A, which the taxpayer must subsequently file with DOTAX.1

The Filing Mechanism: Form N-346A and the Priority Time Stamp

The application process is administrative and date-sensitive, governed by the online submission portal managed by DBEDT. The application period typically spans the month of March, for instance, running from March 3rd to March 31st in a recent period.2

Establishing Allocation Priority

The procedure requires the QHTB to upload the completed and signed Form N-346A (Part A) as the initial step.2 The precise date and time the completed and signed N-346A is received by DBEDT are officially recorded and utilized as the applicant’s application date and time.2 This time stamp is the sole determining factor for allocation priority against the $\$5$ million cap, reinforcing the FCFS structure. Furthermore, the use of up-to-date forms is mandatory; DBEDT has advised applicants that “OLDER FORMS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED”.2

Completing the Application

Following the submission of Form N-346A (Part A), the QHTB must complete a subsequent online Questionnaire (Part B) and upload an associated data spreadsheet (.xls file).2 The deadline for completing this comprehensive Part B documentation is also March 31st.2 The application will not be fully reviewed until all information, including Part B, has been completed and submitted.2

The First-Come, First-Served Allocation Imperative

The administrative guidance explicitly states that certifications will be provided FCFS until the $\$5$ million cap is reached.2 This structure introduces a layer of highly competitive urgency that supersedes the significance of the calendar deadline.

Analysis of historical claims reveals a crucial operational detail: the cap has been reached “almost as soon as the online applications were opened” in recent years.2 This reality means that the March 31st date effectively serves only as a final date of statutory compliance. For any QHTB seeking assurance of funding, the practical deadline is the opening moment of the filing window, usually around March 1st. Any delay increases the risk that claims submitted earlier, even if their total aggregate value exceeds $\$5$ million, will lock out subsequent filers based purely on their time stamp. For a QHTB, treating the application opening date as the effective deadline is essential for a successful funding outcome, rather than waiting until the statutory cutoff.

State Revenue Office Guidance and Compliance Requirements

Compliance with the Hawaii R&D tax credit involves a two-stage process spanning multiple agencies and deadlines: pre-certification submission (DBEDT, March 31st) and post-certification fulfillment (DBEDT/DOTAX, June 30th and 12 months post-year-end).

DBEDT Certification Timeline and Post-March 31st Review

Once the March 31st application period closes, DBEDT undertakes the verification and review process. DBEDT anticipates issuing the signed certificate (Part II of Form N-346A) around June 30th.2 During this review period, DBEDT may contact filers to request additional expense and payroll documentation to verify the submitted costs.2

The Mandatory Annual Compliance Survey (June 30th)

A mandatory requirement for all certified QHTBs is the submission of the Annual Compliance Survey.7 This survey, which must be filed by June 30th, is not merely an administrative check but a crucial component of the program’s oversight.7 The information collected includes:

• Details on jobs, temporary positions, external services, and payroll taxes.10
• Revenue and expense data.3
• Filed intellectual property, including invention disclosures and patents.10
• Information on new companies spun out.10

This data is used by DBEDT, in collaboration with DOTAX, to study the effectiveness and economic impact of the tax credit under HRS §235-110.91.10 The state’s ability to measure the program’s success is predicated on this annual data submission. A significant administrative risk exists because compliance is conditional on both the initial March 31st application and the subsequent June 30th survey. Failure to complete the questionnaire by the June 30th deadline explicitly results in the forfeiture of credits.3 A QHTB might successfully secure a favorable time stamp on March 1st, but if it fails to fulfill the data reporting requirements by June 30th, the conditional credit allocation will be nullified.

Compliance Failure: Consequences and Forfeiture

The consequences of non-compliance with either the March 31st certification submission or the subsequent June 30th survey are severe and absolute. The statute dictates that failure to satisfy the mandatory requirements, including obtaining the certified N-346A and completing the annual survey, “shall constitute a waiver of the right to claim the credit”.11

Claiming vs. Certifying

It is crucial to distinguish between the deadline for certification and the deadline for filing the tax return. The certification statement (N-346A) must be submitted to DBEDT by March 31st. However, the final deadline to formally claim the credit (by attaching the certified N-346A Part II and Form N-346 to the Hawaii income tax return filed with DOTAX) is 12 months after the close of the taxable year in which the qualified expenses were incurred.5

While extensions (such as Hawaii Form N-200V) may grant an automatic six-month extension of time to file the Hawaii return with DOTAX, these extensions do not extend the mandatory March 31st certification submission deadline to DBEDT.12 The certification package must be submitted and timed correctly to capture a portion of the $\$5$ million cap, irrespective of the final tax return filing date.

Calculating the Hawaii TCRA Under New Incremental Rules

The calculation methodology for the Hawaii TCRA has become more rigorous due to the implementation of Act 139 (2024), which mandates the reincorporation of the federal base amount.

The Reinstatement of the Federal Base Amount (Act 139, 2024)

Prior to the 2024 legislative changes, Hawaii allowed QHTBs to claim the R&D credit without calculating the complex incremental base amount required by IRC §41.6 The base amount concept aims to incentivize increasing research activities by basing the credit only on expenditures that exceed an historical average.14 Act 139 reinstated the federal tax provisions in IRC §41, meaning the base amount now applies to the state credit.2 This change fundamentally alters pre-filing preparation.

Taxpayers must now compute the federal base amount, which generally involves calculating a fixed-base percentage multiplied by the average annual gross receipts for the four preceding tax years.7 The resulting federal credit is then based only on the Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) that exceed this calculated base.7 This necessitates detailed historical financial review and calculation completion before the application window opens to ensure the Form N-346A claim is accurate and ready for timely submission.

Formulaic Derivation of the State Credit

Since the Hawaii TCRA is an allocated portion of the federal credit, the state calculation process requires the prior completion of Federal Form 6765.11

The formula for calculating the Hawaii TCRA is straightforward once the federal credit is determined:

$$\text{Hawaii TCRA} = \text{Federal Tax Credit (from Form 6765)} \times \left( \frac{\text{Hawaii QREs}}{\text{Total Federal QREs}} \right)$$

7

The numerator of the allocation fraction is the amount of eligible research expenses conducted specifically in Hawaii, and the denominator is the total amount of expenses eligible for the federal tax credit.11 If 100% of the QREs are conducted in Hawaii, the allocation ratio is 1.0.

Statistical Snapshot of Historical Utilization

The historical utilization data underscores the competitive environment driven by the $\$5$ million cap, justifying the urgency required for the March submission. The analysis of applications in recent years illustrates that the total claimed credit frequently exceeded the available cap, leading to a high rate of non-certification.8

DBEDT Utilization Statistics (Illustrative Data for the 2024 Tax Year Application)

The data confirms that successful compliance requires not only securing an early FCFS time stamp but also maintaining perfect technical eligibility as a QHTB, since nearly $20\%$ of applicants in the 2024 cycle were disqualified for compliance failures.8

Case Study and Strategic Example: Maximizing First-Served Allocation

The following scenario demonstrates the critical difference between observing the statutory March 31st deadline and applying a strategic, time-sensitive approach to the application process.

Scenario: Tech Start-up ‘Aloha Robotics’ (Calendar Year Taxpayer)

Aloha Robotics, a qualified small business, is pursuing the Hawaii R&D Tax Credit for the 2024 tax year.

• 2024 Activity: The company incurred $\$1,500,000$ in Qualified Research Expenses (QREs), all attributable to research conducted within Hawaii.
• Federal Calculation (Pre-March 1st Preparation): Due to the new rules under Act 139, Aloha Robotics must first determine its federal base amount. Assuming the company determines its base amount is $\$500,000$, its incremental QREs eligible for the federal credit total $\$1,000,000$. Using the standard federal credit rate, the calculated Federal Tax Credit (per Form 6765) is $\$200,000$.
• Hawaii Calculation: Since 100% of QREs were in Hawaii, the allocation ratio is $1.0$. The final claimed Hawaii TCRA is $\$200,000$.

The Strategic Impact of Timing

The Proactive Strategy (Early March Submission)

Aloha Robotics understands the FCFS mechanism. They complete their rigorous Form 6765 calculation, secure the signed N-346A, and ensure the entire package is ready for immediate submission upon the opening of the DBEDT online portal on the first possible day (e.g., March 1st or 3rd). This action secures an extremely favorable, low-number time stamp.

Even if $\$4.9$ million in other certified claims precede them, Aloha Robotics’ application is guaranteed to be certified, securing the full $\$200,000$ claim.2 By completing the technical calculations months in advance, the QHTB mitigates the risk of calculation errors and maximizes its chances of being included within the $\$5$ million cap.

The Delayed Strategy (March 31st Submission)

Aloha Robotics decides to wait until the statutory deadline, March 31st, to submit its certified statement.

• Result of Delay: Due to the aggressive filing of claims by other QHTBs, the DBEDT system registers that total claims reached $\$6$ million by March 15th, well exceeding the cap.
• Outcome: Aloha Robotics’ application, received late in the month, falls outside the funded window, based solely on its timestamp.2 Their otherwise valid $\$200,000$ refundable credit is denied funding for the tax year due to the cap being exhausted.

The outcome of this case study illustrates that the cost of waiting is absolute forfeiture of the credit funding when the cap is oversubscribed. The necessary complexity introduced by the new base amount calculation (Act 139) further requires that technical diligence be completed far in advance of the application window opening, not during the competitive filing period.

Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

The March 31st application deadline for the Hawaii R&D Tax Credit (TCRA) is a crucial statutory date, but the operational reality of the $\$5$ million FCFS cap transforms the application window opening in early March into the effective, high-stakes deadline. Compliance success hinges upon navigating a two-pronged compliance path involving certification by DBEDT and final filing with DOTAX, alongside meticulous attention to two distinct deadlines: the March certification date and the June survey date. Failure to achieve priority submission or subsequent administrative fulfillment results in a statutory waiver of the refundable credit.

Strategic Recommendations for Credit Maximization

To maximize the probability of securing the Hawaii R&D Tax Credit, QHTBs must adopt an aggressive, front-loaded compliance timeline:

These steps demonstrate that the successful claim of the Hawaii TCRA relies heavily on administrative foresight and rapid response capability, turning the statutory March 31st deadline into a functional necessity to be addressed well over a month prior to its actual expiration.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/