Comprehensive Analysis of the First-Come, First-Served Basis in Hawaii’s R&D Tax Credit

I. Executive Summary: Securing the Hawaii R&D Tax Credit in a Capped Environment

A. The FCFS Rule Defined

The First-Come, First-Served (FCFS) basis is the mandated administrative method used by the Hawaii Department of Business, Economic Development, and Tourism (DBEDT) to allocate the stringent $5 million annual aggregate cap for the refundable Tax Credit for Research Activities (TCRA).1

This mechanism requires precise, instantaneous application submission upon the opening of the filing window, as allocation priority is strictly determined by the time stamp of the completed Form N-346A submission.3

B. Strategic Context and Importance of Timing

The Hawaii TCRA, codified under Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) §235-110.91, serves as a critical financial incentive for Qualified High Technology Businesses (QHTBs) that invest in innovative research conducted within the state. The credit is particularly valuable because it is refundable, meaning that the excess portion of the credit that exceeds the taxpayer’s liability is paid out in cash.2

However, the refundable nature and the legislative commitment to the technology sector create immense demand, which is strictly managed by a statutory $5 million aggregate annual cap.1 This constraint establishes a zero-sum competitive environment for QHTBs. Historically, the pressure to secure this funding has been extreme: data from 2020 through 2023 confirms that the annual cap was typically reached “almost as soon as the online applications were opened”.3 This rapid utilization led directly to the denial of certification for numerous otherwise eligible QHTBs whose applications arrived milliseconds too late.4

Consequently, success in obtaining this credit hinges almost entirely on administrative speed and preparation. The critical prerequisite is the timely completion and submission of the initial certification application with DBEDT, specifically Form N-346A, which establishes the applicant’s position in the FCFS queue, rather than the later filing date of the final tax return with the Department of Taxation (DOTAX).

II. Statutory Framework: The Hawaii Tax Credit for Research Activities (HRS §235-110.91)

A. QHTB Eligibility and Regulatory Mandates

The Hawaii TCRA is exclusively available to Qualified High Technology Businesses (QHTBs). Eligibility is based on a set of stringent and narrowly defined statutory requirements, recently updated by Act 139, Session Laws of Hawaii 2024.2

To qualify, a business must meet the following criteria:

1. Small Business Definition: The business must be defined as a “small business,” meaning it has no more than 500 employees.1
2. Local Activity Threshold: The business must conduct more than 50 percent of its activities in qualified research within the State of Hawaii.3
3. Registration: The business must be registered to do business in Hawaii.3
4. Federal Requirement: The taxpayer must also claim the corresponding federal tax credit for increasing research activities under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) §41.5

The credit supports key high-tech sectors, including biotechnology, software development, and ocean sciences.2 Crucially, the legislative status of the program was extended by Act 139, which moved the sunset date for the TCRA to December 31, 2029, providing important long-term certainty for technology firms operating in the state.5

B. Calculation Methodology: The Impact of Act 139

The claimed credit amount is calculated by first determining the federal R&D tax credit using Federal Form 6765, and then multiplying that federal amount by a ratio.2 This ratio is determined by dividing the amount of qualified research expenses (QREs) conducted in Hawaii by the total QREs eligible for the federal credit.5

$$\text{Hawaii TCRA} = \text{Federal R\&D Credit} \times \left(\frac{\text{Hawaii QREs}}{\text{Total Federal QREs}}\right)$$

A fundamental regulatory change occurred with the passage of Act 139 (SB 2497) in 2024. This legislation repealed the prior provision that made the federal base amount inapplicable to the Hawaii credit.5 As a result, the credit calculation for tax years beginning after December 31, 2023, must now align with IRC §41, meaning the credit is based only on the incremental portion of QREs that exceeds a fixed base amount.2

The reinstatement of the incremental base calculation significantly impacts the total amount of credits claimed statewide. In prior years (2020–2023), when the calculation was non-incremental, the average tax credit claimed per QHTB was significantly higher, ranging from approximately $0.45 million to $0.56 million.4 These larger individual claims quickly overwhelmed the $5 million cap, necessitating the intense FCFS competition.4

The subsequent data from the 2024 tax year illustrates the effect of Act 139: the total certified credits amounted to only $2.6 million, significantly less than the $5 million cap, and the average claimed credit dropped to about $0.15 million.4 This shift in calculation methodology directly mitigated the acute time pressure associated with the FCFS mechanism in 2024. However, while the immediate bottleneck pressure has eased due to smaller claims, the FCFS structure and the strict $5 million hard cap remain statutory components of the program. Strategic consultants must advise clients that the competitive environment could intensify again as firms adjust their spending and calculation models to the incremental base rule.

III. The First-Come, First-Served (FCFS) Imperative: Mechanism and Context

A. Defining the FCFS Trigger and Timing

The FCFS rule is triggered by the $5 million aggregate cap mandated by statute.1 This cap represents the absolute maximum amount of credits DBEDT is authorized to certify in any given calendar year.

The application period for certification (Form N-346A) typically opens early in the year, for instance, starting on Monday, March 3rd, at 9:00 am HST for the 2025 cycle, and generally closes at the end of March.2 However, the three-week window is effectively meaningless if the cap is reached instantly, as has been the case historically.3

DBEDT’s specific guidance outlines the critical procedure for establishing FCFS priority: the date and time a completed and signed Form N-346A (Part I) is received by DBEDT via the online application portal is the precise determinant of the applicant’s time stamp.3 This makes the successful electronic submission of this form, designated as Step 1 of the process, the single most critical action for securing the credit. Although subsequent compliance steps must be met (such as completing the Questionnaire and data file in Part B by the March 31st deadline), the priority for being certified is based solely on the instantaneous time stamp of the N-346A submission.3

B. Allocation Policy: Hard Stop vs. Proration

Hawaii utilizes a hard-stop mechanism to enforce the $5 million cap. DBEDT explicitly states that it “will stop certifying once the amount claimed has reached a cap of $5 million”.1

The consequence of this hard-stop policy is that the FCFS mechanism operates as an all-or-nothing system. Unlike some state credit programs that employ a pro-rata reduction to allocate remaining funds among applicants, in Hawaii, claims submitted after the cap has been reached are denied entirely.4 Historical utilization data reinforces this practice, showing that between 2020 and 2023, 17 to 30 QHTBs were outright not certified each year because their claims pushed the cumulative total beyond the $5 million limit.4

This competitive structure presents a high-stakes, zero-sum environment where administrative delays, even by a matter of seconds during the critical opening hour, can lead to the complete forfeiture of the potential credit amount.

C. Consequences of Non-Certification

A fundamental aspect of the Hawaii TCRA is its status as a refundable credit, meaning any excess credit not used to offset state income tax liability is paid out to the taxpayer as a cash refund.2 Because the credit is refundable, there is no provision for a credit carryforward.2 Therefore, a denied or uncertified credit resulting from either late FCFS submission or subsequent disqualification is permanently lost; the company cannot carry that value forward to offset tax liability or receive a refund in a future tax year.8

Furthermore, success in the FCFS race is only the initial hurdle. A QHTB that successfully secures certification must also fulfill ongoing compliance obligations. A mandatory annual survey must be completed and filed electronically with DBEDT by June 30th of the calendar year following the taxable year in which the research was conducted.1 DBEDT explicitly states that failure to complete this questionnaire by the deadline will result in the disallowance of the certified credit.1 In the 2024 tax year, five applicants were disqualified, including one that failed to complete the required survey and others that failed to meet employee or local activity thresholds.4

IV. Administrative Guidance: DBEDT’s Certification Process and DOTAX Requirements

The administration of the TCRA is segmented between the Department of Business, Economic Development, and Tourism (DBEDT), which manages certification and the FCFS allocation, and the Department of Taxation (DOTAX), which manages the final claim processing.

A. DBEDT Certification Process (FCFS and Eligibility Check)

DBEDT manages the certification process, which is divided into sequential steps prioritizing speed and compliance 3:

1. Preparation: Prior to the application opening, the QHTB must ensure all financial calculations are complete and must utilize the most recent version of Form N-346A (Application for Certification of Tax Credit for Research Activities). DBEDT warns that updated forms must be used and that older forms will not be accepted.3
2. Application Opening: The application portal opens at the designated time (e.g., 9:00 am HST).3
3. Step 1: FCFS Submission (Part A): The QHTB must upload the completed and signed N-346A form. The instantaneous receipt time of this upload dictates the FCFS priority against the $5 million cap.3
4. Step 2: Compliance Submission (Part B): Following the initial upload, the applicant must complete a detailed Questionnaire (Part B (1)) and upload a corresponding.xls data file (Part B (2)) detailing qualified expenses. The deadline for completing Part B is March 31st.3 Importantly, if Part B is incomplete or missing, the application will not be reviewed, regardless of a successful early time stamp on the N-346A.
5. Issuance: DBEDT reviews the application for both FCFS priority and statutory compliance. If approved, DBEDT issues a signed certificate (N-346A form) to the QHTB.1

B. DOTAX Claiming Requirements (Filing and Deadlines)

Once certification is secured from DBEDT, the QHTB proceeds to claim the credit via the Department of Taxation (DOTAX).

1. Required Documentation: To finalize the claim, the taxpayer must attach three primary documents to their Hawaii income tax return: Hawaii Form N-346 (used to figure and claim the credit), the certified Form N-346A (signed by DBEDT), and the corresponding Federal Form 6765.1 Flow-through entities (S corporations, partnerships) must also include Schedule K-1s documenting the allocation of the credit to their owners.5
2. Filing Deadline: The deadline for claiming the credit, including amended claims, is strictly 12 months after the close of the taxable year.5 While income tax returns may be automatically extended to October, the 12-month window for claiming the certified TCRA credit must be adhered to.10
3. Annual Survey Mandate: As noted previously, the QHTB must complete the mandatory annual survey prescribed by DBEDT and submit it electronically by June 30th.1 This mandatory compliance step, occurring months after certification, is a non-negotiable requirement for the credit to be allowed.1

The strategy for applying for the TCRA must therefore be dual-phased. Phase 1 is the high-risk, time-sensitive FCFS race managed by DBEDT in March, focused purely on securing a time stamp and achieving certification. Phase 2 involves sustained compliance, ensuring the mandatory June 30th survey is filed and that the final claim is submitted to DOTAX within the 12-month deadline. Failure in the compliance phase voids the success achieved in the FCFS phase.4

V. Strategic Risk Analysis: Data Trends and Allocation Dynamics

A. Analysis of Historical Utilization Data (2020–2024)

The historical usage of the TCRA demonstrates the severe competitive nature of the $5 million aggregate cap, especially prior to the calculation changes introduced in 2024.

Hawaii R&D Tax Credit Utilization (Aggregate Cap: $5 Million)

The data confirms that in the years preceding the 2024 legislative changes, demand far outstripped supply, with total claimed credits often exceeding twice the available cap.4 This resulted in significant numbers of QHTBs being completely shut out of the program due to the FCFS mechanism.4

The dramatic under-utilization observed in 2024, where the total certified credit was only $2.6 million (52% of the cap), is a direct consequence of Act 139 reinstating the incremental base calculation.4 By aligning the state credit with the federal method, the average claim size decreased substantially, allowing all qualified applicants in 2024 to receive their certification without triggering the FCFS bottleneck.4 This provides a temporary stabilization but does not alter the fundamental FCFS risk. The primary threat remains the potential for increasing QREs among existing firms or the entry of new, large claimants, which could instantly reinstate the competitive sprint if the statutory $5 million cap is exceeded again.

B. Common Disqualification Factors (Beyond FCFS)

While FCFS failure is the most dramatic risk, QHTBs face disqualification from DBEDT for technical eligibility breaches, even if their application time stamp secures a spot under the cap. Data from the 2024 tax year, when the cap was not reached, highlights common administrative and statutory reasons for denial 4:

1. Employee Limit Violation: Exceeding the mandatory 500-employee threshold.4
2. Research Activity Threshold: Failing to document that more than 50% of the QHTB’s activities constituted qualified research conducted in Hawaii.4
3. Administrative Compliance Failure: Missing critical requirements, such as failing to submit a General Excise Tax (GET) license or, critically, failing to complete the annual DBEDT survey by the June 30th deadline.4

VI. Case Study: Calculation and FCFS Allocation Example

A. Example Calculation of Certified Credit Amount

This case study illustrates the necessary calculation methodology for the Hawaii TCRA, incorporating the post-Act 139 reinstatement of the incremental base per IRC §41.2

Scenario: QHTB A (Gamma Labs)

Gamma Labs, a QHTB, reports total qualified research expenses (QREs) of $1.2 million worldwide. Of this amount, $480,000 (40%) is attributable to qualified research conducted in Hawaii. Based on their four-year average annual gross receipts, their calculated federal base amount (per IRC §41) is $500,000.2

Table: Hawaii TCRA Calculation (Post-Act 139)

Gamma Labs would apply to DBEDT to certify a credit amount of $56,000.

B. FCFS Hard-Stop Allocation Simulation

This simulation demonstrates the allocation process under the FCFS hard-stop rule when the annual cap is nearing exhaustion. Assume that applications already certified by DBEDT have cumulatively reached $4.8 million, leaving only $200,000 remaining under the statutory $5 million cap.

Table: FCFS Hard-Stop Allocation

This simulation highlights the critical administrative feature of the Hawaii FCFS rule: the absence of proration. QHTB Y required $300,000 but only $200,000 was available. Under a hard-stop system, the entire claim is rejected because the time stamp placed the full request over the statutory ceiling. The mechanism is a high-speed transactional test where even small differences in submission time lead to total success or failure for the applicant.

VII. Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

The Hawaii Tax Credit for Research Activities (HRS §235-110.91) offers a highly valuable, refundable tax credit that is severely constrained by a $5 million annual aggregate cap.2 The FCFS mechanism is the state’s necessary, albeit aggressive, tool for managing this limited resource, creating a unique set of strategic risks for Qualified High Technology Businesses (QHTBs).

The competitive pressure, historically characterized by the cap being reached in the opening moments of the application window, dictates that securing the credit is an administrative race against time.3 While the recent adoption of the incremental base calculation (Act 139) has temporarily reduced the intensity of the FCFS sprint by shrinking the size of individual claims, the statutory hard cap and the FCFS rule remain in full effect through the program’s extension to 2029.4

Strategic Recommendations for QHTBs

1. Precision Timing for Certification: Success depends almost exclusively on executing the upload of the completed, signed Form N-346A (Part A) at the precise moment the DBEDT application portal opens. All required financial and statutory information must be prepared and vetted internally well in advance of the scheduled opening time (e.g., 9:00 am HST in March).3
2. Mandatory Compliance Prioritization: The FCFS time stamp only secures a place in line; the credit is contingent on sustained compliance. Businesses must rigorously adhere to the statutory QHTB definition (500-employee limit, $>50\%$ Hawaii research) and, crucially, must file the mandatory electronic survey with DBEDT by the annual June 30th deadline to avoid retroactive disallowance.1
3. Accurate Calculation Under Act 139: Claims must reflect the recent legislative changes, specifically the reinstatement of the federal incremental base calculation (IRC §41).2 Taxpayers must compute the federal credit based on excess QREs before applying the Hawaii QRE ratio to determine the eligible state claim.
4. Adherence to Dual-Agency Deadlines: Tax planning must account for the separate responsibilities of the two agencies. The FCFS certification deadline (March) is managed by DBEDT, while the final claim (Form N-346, Form N-346A) must be filed with DOTAX within the mandatory 12-month period following the close of the taxable year.1

The refundable nature of the Hawaii TCRA offers substantial financial benefits, but its competitive structure emphasizes administrative precision and strict timing. For a QHTB, obtaining the credit is an operational test that rewards meticulous planning and instantaneous execution.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/