The Critical Intersection of IRC §41 and the Hawaii Research Activities Tax Credit: Navigating Compliance Post-Act 139 (SLH 2024)

IRC §41 is the foundational federal rule defining qualified research expenses and the methodology for calculating the Research and Development (R&D) tax credit.

The Hawaii Tax Credit for Research Activities (HRS §235-110.91) adopts this federal structure to grant a proportional, refundable state credit, strictly contingent upon the federal calculation and eligibility standards.1

The Hawaii Tax Credit for Research Activities (TCRA), codified under Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) §235-110.91, serves as a crucial state-level incentive designed to foster technological innovation and growth, particularly within the state’s high-technology sector. This mechanism is not standalone; rather, it is inextricably linked to the federal Credit for Increasing Research Activities governed by Internal Revenue Code (IRC) §41. Taxpayers seeking the Hawaii credit must first successfully satisfy all federal requirements, calculate the federal credit, and only then apply a proportion of that calculated amount to their state liability. Recent legislative action, specifically Act 139 (Session Laws of Hawaii 2024), introduced significant structural changes that fundamentally shift the compliance landscape and the financial benefit available to eligible businesses, making an in-depth understanding of the federal nexus and the new state restrictions paramount for tax professionals and corporate executives.

The 2024 legislation fundamentally restructured the calculation methodology for established qualified high technology businesses (QHTBs) by repealing the prior exemption that allowed the credit to be taken on all qualified research expenses (QREs). This new law mandates the use of the IRC §41 base amount calculation—either the Regular Research Credit (RRC) or the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC)—for determining the creditable increase in research spending.3 This shift significantly reduces the potential credit for businesses that are maintaining, rather than substantially increasing, their qualified research investment. Furthermore, Act 139 restricted eligibility to “small businesses,” defined as entities having no more than 500 employees, focusing the limited $5 million refundable statewide pool on high-growth, smaller enterprises.5 The tax credit is currently scheduled to be repealed from the statute on December 31, 2029.3

The Federal Nexus – IRC §41 and the Foundation of Qualified Research

The Hawaii TCRA relies entirely on the federal framework for determining what constitutes qualified activity and which expenses are eligible for the credit.1 Non-compliance at the federal level immediately invalidates any corresponding state claim.4 Therefore, successful navigation of the Hawaii credit begins with meticulous adherence to federal IRC §41 rules.

Defining Qualified Research Activities (QRAs)

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) imposes a rigorous four-part test derived from IRC §41(d) to determine if an activity constitutes Qualified Research. Successful claims require meeting all four statutory requirements.7 These four tests serve as the primary gatekeeper for eligibility:

1. Section 174 Test (Expenditure Qualification): The expenditures associated with the activity must be capable of being treated as expenses under IRC §174 (research or experimental expenditures).7
2. Technological in Nature: The research must be undertaken for the purpose of discovering information that is technological in nature, relying on principles of the physical sciences, biological sciences, engineering, or computer science.7
3. Business Component Test (Permitted Purpose): The application of the research must be intended to be useful in the development of a new or improved business component of the taxpayer. This improvement relates specifically to the component’s functionality, performance, reliability, or quality.7
4. Process of Experimentation: The taxpayer must establish that the research activity involves a process of evaluating one or more alternatives designed to eliminate technological uncertainty. This requires formally identifying the uncertainty, identifying the alternatives intended to eliminate that uncertainty, and conducting a process of evaluating those alternatives.7

These stringent federal requirements for documentation—particularly concerning the technological uncertainty and the process of experimentation—are implicitly adopted by Hawaii’s Department of Taxation (DOTax) through the mandated claim of the federal credit.4 This administrative structure means that the state implicitly relies on the taxpayer’s compliance with rigorous federal audit standards for validating QREs, significantly streamlining state oversight but placing a heavy compliance burden on the Qualified High Technology Business (QHTB).

Defining Qualified Research Expenses (QREs)

IRC §41 defines QREs as the sum of in-house research expenses and contract research expenses that are paid or incurred by the taxpayer during the taxable year in carrying on a trade or business.9

• In-House Research Expenses: This category includes wages paid to employees who are performing, supervising, or directly supporting qualified high-tech research activities conducted in Hawaii.6
• Contract Research Expenses: This includes 65% of amounts paid to third parties who conduct qualified research on behalf of the taxpayer.9
• Supplies: Costs of tangible property used in the research process are included, though costs for land or depreciable property are specifically excluded.9

Statutory Exclusions (IRC §41(d)(4))

A critical aspect of IRC §41 is the list of excluded activities that prevent certain common business tasks from qualifying for the credit.7 These exclusions apply equally to the Hawaii TCRA calculation. Excluded activities include, but are not limited to, research conducted after the beginning of commercial production, research related to the adaptation or duplication of existing components, research relating to management functions, internal-use software development (except under specific regulatory exceptions), foreign research, research in the social sciences, and research funded by a third party.7

Mechanics of the Federal Credit Calculation

The calculated Federal Credit Amount on Form 6765 serves as the essential basis for determining the final refundable Hawaii TCRA.6 Taxpayers must choose one of two methods prescribed under IRC §41 to calculate this credit. The choice of methodology directly dictates the size of the Hawaii refundable credit, making an optimal selection a key element of the overall tax strategy.

The Regular Research Credit (RRC) Method

The RRC calculates the credit as 20% of the difference between the current year’s QREs and a statutory base amount.11

Base Amount Determination: The base amount is calculated by multiplying the Fixed-Base Percentage (FBP), which is derived from historical QREs and gross receipts, by the average annual gross receipts for the four preceding tax years.6 A critical statutory restriction is that this calculated base amount can never be less than 50% of the current year’s QREs.6 This floor ensures that businesses must show a substantial increase in QREs—at least 50% of current year expenses—before any credit can be generated. The RRC method is generally best suited for established businesses with consistent historical data, though startups may benefit from special fixed-base rules (a 3% initial phase-in).6

The Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) Method

As an elective alternative, the ASC method simplifies the calculation by providing a lower credit rate (14%) but requiring less extensive historical data.12 The ASC calculates the credit as 14% of the current QREs that exceed 50% of the average QREs from the three preceding taxable years.12

The ASC method is frequently preferred by growing companies or those lacking the deep historical records necessary for the RRC base calculation, offering simplicity and consistency.11 For businesses lacking pre-1984 data needed for the full RRC, the ASC often provides the only viable path to claiming the federal credit, which is a prerequisite for the Hawaii TCRA.11

Federal Form 6765 and Calculation Strategy

The calculation of the Federal Credit Amount must be completed on Federal Form 6765, Credit for Increasing Research Activities, and filed alongside the federal income tax return.12 Since the selection of the optimal federal calculation method (RRC or ASC) dictates the state benefit, taxpayers should calculate the credit under both methods to determine which yields the largest Federal Credit Amount. This maximum value becomes the starting point for the Hawaii pro-rata calculation.14

The recent mandate for Hawaii QHTBs to use the IRC §41 base calculation (Act 139) disproportionately impacts long-standing businesses. Established QHTBs with stable QRE levels must now strategically choose the method (RRC or ASC) that results in the lowest possible base amount to maximize the creditable excess QREs. This reinforces the state’s theme of promoting growth in research expenditure over merely subsidizing baseline maintenance.

Hawaii’s TCRA: Eligibility and Statutory Framework (HRS §235-110.91)

While the Hawaii statute incorporates IRC §41 by reference, it imposes stringent local eligibility requirements and administrative structures that must be satisfied independently of federal compliance.

Defining the Qualified High Technology Business (QHTB) Status

Act 139 fundamentally amended the definition of a Qualified High Technology Business (QHTB) for tax years beginning after December 31, 2023.4 The focus has narrowed to small, high-growth entities.

The QHTB must now satisfy three mandatory criteria to claim the credit:

1. Small Business Limitation: The entity must be defined as a small business, meaning a company with no more than 500 employees.3
2. Activity Threshold: The business must conduct more than 50% of its total activities in qualified research within Hawaiʻi.3
3. Registration: The business must be registered to do business in Hawaiʻi.3

This new employee restriction aims the highly valuable refundable credit at smaller enterprises, channeling the limited state funds to businesses most likely to generate incremental job growth and innovation within the state.

Refundability and Proportionality

A core feature of the Hawaii TCRA is its refundability. The credit is a refundable income tax credit.6 If the calculated credit amount exceeds the taxpayer’s net income tax liability for the year, the excess amount is paid to the taxpayer as a cash refund.6 This refundability eliminates the need for tax carryforwards for unused portions of the state credit, simplifying future tax planning.6

The magnitude of the state credit is determined through a pro-rata formula. The statute dictates that the Hawaii credit is equal to the calculated federal R&D credit, multiplied by the ratio of Hawaii QREs to the taxpayer’s total (nationwide) QREs.6

$$\text{Hawaii TCRA} = \text{Federal Credit Amount} \times \left( \frac{\text{Hawaii QREs}}{\text{Total Nationwide QREs}} \right)$$

Sunset Provision and Carryover

The TCRA was extended by Act 139 and is currently scheduled to sunset on December 31, 2029.3 While the credit itself is refundable, the instructions for Form N-356, related to other state tax credits, illustrate that Hawaii does utilize carryover mechanisms for certain credits, although the refundability of the TCRA generally makes such carryover unnecessary for this specific research credit.15

Legislative Mandate Shift: Analyzing Act 139 (SLH 2024)

Act 139 (SLH 2024), effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2023, represents the most significant recent change to the TCRA, fundamentally reversing a long-standing state policy regarding credit calculation.4

Repeal of Full QRE Credit and Base Amount Reintroduction

Historically, the Hawaii statute contained a provision that explicitly rendered the IRC §41 base amount rules inapplicable to the TCRA, effectively allowing QHTBs to claim the credit on all current-year QREs conducted in Hawaii, regardless of previous spending levels.2

Act 139 repealed this provision.4 Per the updated rules, the federal base amount calculation in IRC §41 must now apply.3 Consequently, credits may no longer be taken for all qualified research expenses without regard to the amount of expenses for previous years.3 The federal base calculation (RRC or ASC) is now mandatory for determining the initial Federal Credit Amount used in the state proration.3

This policy adjustment indicates a policy tightening, shifting the credit’s focus from a broad subsidy of research costs to a targeted incentive aimed solely at encouraging new, marginal research spending. The state’s legislative aim is to ensure the limited refundable credit pool generates maximum economic stimulation by only rewarding year-over-year growth.

Financial Consequences and Compliance Risks

The mandatory reintroduction of the base calculation disproportionately affects established QHTBs. Companies with steady QRE spending that previously maximized their credit under the old rules will experience a sharp decline in the credit magnitude, as only QREs representing growth over their historical base are now creditable. This may necessitate a fundamental re-evaluation of R&D budgets and strategic resource allocation for long-term Hawaii operations.

Furthermore, compliance risk increases significantly. Established QHTBs that relied on the pre-2024 Hawaii rules may not have retained the extensive historical documentation necessary to properly calculate the complex IRC §41 base amount (RRC or ASC) for prior years.4 This creates an immediate, complex compliance burden for their 2024 filings, demanding the reconstruction of historical gross receipts and QRE data dating back years.

Table: Comparison of Hawaii R&D Tax Credit Provisions (HRS §235-110.91)

Administrative Compliance and Guidance from State Agencies

Successfully claiming the Hawaii TCRA requires navigating the administrative requirements of two distinct state agencies: the Department of Business, Economic Development, and Tourism (DBEDT) and the Department of Taxation (DOTax). Successful claims hinge on adherence to the strict filing windows associated with the annual aggregate cap.

The Dual-Authority Structure: Roles of DBEDT and DOTax

The administrative process is divided between the two agencies:

• DBEDT: Functions as the gatekeeper for QHTB status and credit allocation. DBEDT is responsible for certifying research activities, verifying research and development costs, and allocating the credit under the statutory statewide cap.1
• DOTax: Is the final collection and distribution authority. DOTax receives the tax return (e.g., Form N-20, N-11), processes Form N-346, and issues the actual refundable payment.3

DBEDT Certification Process and the $5 Million Cap

To secure the credit, taxpayers must first obtain certification from DBEDT.

Form N-346A Submission: Taxpayers must submit Form N-346A, Certified Statement of Research and Development Costs, along with documentation to DBEDT.6 This statement requires the QHTB to identify qualified expenditures, verify the nature of the qualifying research activity, and certify the amount of the claimed credit.1

The $5 Million Cap and Critical Deadline: The TCRA is severely limited by a $5 million annual aggregate statewide cap.3 Crucially, the credit is allocated on a first-come, first-served basis based on the submission date of Form N-346A to DBEDT.3 The application window is extremely narrow, typically running from March 3 through March 31 following the close of the taxable year.3

Statistical data from prior years confirms the acute risk: the total credit claimed historically exceeded the $5M cap, resulting in the disqualification of numerous QHTBs.19 This high level of competition means that tax planning must be finalized early in Q1, as missing the March deadline essentially guarantees failure to secure the credit.

Issuance of Certificate: Upon review and acceptance of Form N-346A, DBEDT verifies the information, certifies the costs, and issues an official certificate (Part II of Form N-346A) to the taxpayer, which is often approved around June 30.1 This certificate is mandatory for filing the tax return. If the QHTB is a flow-through entity (e.g., S corporation or partnership), the QHTB is responsible for distributing copies of the certificate to all taxpayers claiming the credit.17

The reliance on the federal credit calculation, especially after Act 139’s mandate, implies that DBEDT’s verification role will likely expand. DBEDT must be assured of the accuracy of the underlying federal calculation before certifying the state amount. This operational change means DBEDT may request detailed expense and payroll documentation to verify the federal base calculation (e.g., historical gross receipts data or prior years’ QREs), increasing the audit risk profile of the Form N-346A submission.3

DOTax Filing Requirements (Form N-346)

The final step is the claim filed with the DOTax. Taxpayers use Form N-346, Tax Credit for Research Activities, to officially claim the credit against their Hawaii income tax liability.4

Form N-346 must be attached to the taxpayer’s annual Hawaii income tax return (e.g., Form N-11, N-20, N-30, etc.).16 Crucially, the taxpayer must attach the approved DBEDT certificate (Form N-346A Part II) and the federal Form 6765.4 Any partnership, S corporation, estate, trust, or cooperative allocating this credit must attach Forms N-346, N-346A, federal Form 6765, and Schedule K-1s to its income tax return.4

Table: Annual Hawaii R&D Tax Credit Compliance Timeline

Calculation Methodology and Example

The final TCRA calculation requires a two-step process: determining the eligible federal credit increase (Step 1) and applying the Hawaii expense ratio (Step 2).

The Pro-Rata Formula: Integrating Federal Credit and Local Expense Ratio

The Hawaii credit is derived by applying the federal credit percentage (20% for RRC or 14% for ASC) only to the portion of the creditable increase attributable to Hawaii activities.6 The formula integrates the calculated Federal Credit Amount with the Hawaii Expense Ratio:

$$\text{Hawaii TCRA} = \text{Federal Credit Amount} \times \left( \frac{\text{Hawaii QREs}}{\text{Total Federal QREs}} \right)$$

Example Scenario: Established QHTB Calculating Credit Post-Act 139 (RRC Method)

This scenario demonstrates the financial implications of Act 139’s mandatory base calculation for an established QHTB (under 500 employees) that has maintained steady R&D spending over several years.

Scenario Parameters (Tax Year 2024):

• QHTB Status: Compliant (under 500 employees; over 50% Hawaii research).
• Current Year (2024) Total QREs (Nationwide): $1,000,000
• Current Year (2024) Hawaii QREs: $800,000
• 4-Year Average Gross Receipts (2020-2023): $15,000,000
• Fixed-Base Percentage (Historical): 6.0%

Table: Hypothetical Hawaii TCRA Calculation (Regular Research Credit Method)

The base amount ($500,000) effectively serves as a non-creditable threshold. This amount represents the QHTB’s minimum historical investment required to trigger any credit under IRC §41 rules.

For comparison, under the rules in effect prior to Act 139, the credit would have been calculated based on total QREs ($1,000,000) multiplied by the federal rate (20%) and then prorated by the Hawaii ratio (80%), yielding a credit of $160,000. The calculated credit of $80,000 under the new law is $80,000 less than the previous potential benefit. This demonstrates that QHTBs with stable, high historical gross receipts (leading to a high Fixed Base Amount) are the most negatively impacted by the legislative change, as 50% of the QHTB’s total research effort is now required merely to reach the statutory floor before any credit can be generated.4

Conclusion: Strategic Compliance in Hawaii’s Research Incentive

The Hawaii Tax Credit for Research Activities (TCRA) remains one of the state’s most powerful economic incentives due to its full refundability, but its operational requirements have become significantly more restrictive and complex following the passage of Act 139 (SLH 2024).

The analysis yields several critical conclusions for QHTBs:

1. Mandatory Federal Compliance is the Prerequisite: The Hawaii TCRA is intrinsically linked to IRC §41. Taxpayers must rigorously satisfy the four-part test for qualified research activities and must calculate and claim the federal credit via Form 6765.4 Failure to properly document the federal requirements, including the technological uncertainty and process of experimentation, invalidates the state claim.
2. Compliance Priority Shifts to the Certification Deadline: Due to the highly competitive nature of the $5 million annual aggregate cap and the “first-come, first-served” allocation mechanism 3, the administrative priority must shift from the standard income tax deadline to the narrow DBEDT certification window (March 3-31). Tax planning and documentation must be finalized well in advance of this window.
3. Act 139 Demands Strategic R&D Planning: The reintroduction of the mandatory IRC §41 base calculation fundamentally alters the financial feasibility for established QHTBs. These businesses must now focus tax strategy on maximizing the creditable increase in QREs over their historical base, rather than simply maximizing total QREs. This legislative change strategically targets the credit toward promoting new investment and growth by small enterprises (under 500 employees) until the sunset date of 2029.5
4. Increased Documentation Scrutiny: Given that the refundable credit magnitude is now directly tied to the complex federal base calculation, QHTBs should anticipate increased scrutiny from DBEDT regarding the historical data (gross receipts and QREs) necessary to support the RRC or ASC methodology claimed on Form N-346A. Thorough documentation of prior years’ financial data is essential to mitigate potential risk during the certification process.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/