Navigating Hawaii’s Research Tax Credit: A Deep Dive into the IRC §41 (2011) Conformity Benchmark

Executive Summary: The Dual Nature of the Hawaii TCRA

The Hawaii Tax Credit for Research Activities (TCRA) links its eligibility criteria to the federal R&D tax credit, specifically IRC §41 as enacted on December 31, 2011.1 This fixed-date conformity requires taxpayers to apply the federal law’s definitions and incremental calculation method—as interpreted by state law post-2012—only to qualified research expenses incurred within Hawaii by a Qualified High Technology Business (QHTB).3

The state legislature’s adoption of a specific historical iteration of the federal statute established a permanent, non-dynamic benchmark for research definitions and calculation methodologies. This policy ensures that the Hawaii credit remains tied to the established principles of the federal credit structure, but it mandates meticulous compliance with the rules that were in effect immediately following the temporary extension of the federal credit through the end of 2011.4 Moreover, the calculation method transitioned significantly after 2012, moving from a simple expense credit to a complex incremental credit based on the ratio of local spending to total national spending, subject to a stringent annual cap and mandatory pre-filing certification process.5

Section 1: The Federal Benchmark: IRC §41 as Enacted December 31, 2011

The foundation of the Hawaii TCRA is the explicit reference to Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41, which governs the credit for increasing research activities. By locking the state credit to the version of IRC §41 “as that section was enacted on December 31, 2011,” Hawaii created a specific, unchanging legal framework for determining eligibility, irrespective of any subsequent changes to federal tax law.1

1.1 Defining Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) under the 2011 Act

The definitions within IRC §41(b) as of the fixed date establish precisely which expenditures qualify for the credit. The federal credit, which was frequently renewed by Congress and was temporarily extended through December 31, 2011, by Pub. L. 111-312 4, defines Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) across several categories:

• In-House Research Expenses: IRC §41 specifies three primary types of expenses eligible for inclusion: (1) wages paid to employees for performing qualified services, which includes direct supervision, direct support, and direct performance of research activities; (2) the cost of supplies used in the conduct of qualified research; and (3) amounts paid for the rental or lease of computers used in research.6
• Contract Research Expenses: This category allows for the inclusion of 65% of amounts paid or incurred to persons other than employees for qualified research performed on the taxpayer’s behalf.
• Qualified Research Activity (QRA): The activity generating these expenses must meet the four-part test derived from IRC §41(d), requiring the research to seek to discover information that is technological in nature, the application of which is intended to be useful in the development of a new or improved business component, and which involves a process of experimentation intended to eliminate uncertainty. Hawaii specifically utilizes this foundational IRC definition of “Qualified research” within its requirements for a Qualified High Technology Business (QHTB).8

1.2 Calculation Methodology Options under the 2011 Framework

The core constraint of the federal research credit structure is its incremental nature. The credit, as defined in 2011, applied only to increases in research activity above a historical baseline, known as the “Base Amount.” Taxpayers claiming the credit federally—and by extension, for Hawaii purposes post-2012—had two main methods for computing this base:

• Regular Research Credit (RRC): The RRC allows a credit calculated at 20% of the amount by which current QREs exceed the calculated “Base Amount.” This Base Amount is determined by applying a fixed-base percentage to the average annual gross receipts for the four preceding taxable years, subject to a limitation that the Base Amount cannot be less than 50% of the current year’s QREs.9 The calculation of the fixed-base percentage itself relies on historical QREs and gross receipts from the 1984–1988 period.10
• Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC): The ASC method, designed to simplify compliance and reliance on older historical data, provides an election to calculate the credit using a 14% rate (or 12% for taxable years ending before January 1, 2009, as per the 2011 law) applied to the amount by which current QREs exceed 50% of the average QREs for the three preceding tax years.4

The reliance on the specific 2011 federal version introduces a structural requirement for compliance. Because Hawaii’s law locks into this particular snapshot of IRC §41, Qualified High Technology Businesses (QHTBs) must perform their Hawaii credit calculations using the exact federal parameters and definitions effective December 31, 2011. This creates administrative overhead, as the taxpayer is compelled to construct a “ghost” calculation, often requiring the preparation of a hypothetical federal Form 6765 based solely on 2011 law, even if their actual federal filing uses current law or more recently amended rates and thresholds. This need to maintain records and perform calculations adhering to an obsolete federal standard highlights the administrative complexity embedded in Hawaii’s fixed-date conformity policy.

Section 2: Hawaii’s Statutory Framework (HRS §235-110.91)

Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) §235-110.91 provides the specific modifications and limitations applied to the adopted federal framework, defining who qualifies, where the activity must occur, and the prerequisites for claiming the credit.

2.1 Fixed-Date Conformity and the Critical Effective Date

HRS §235-110.91 clearly establishes that the federal tax provisions in IRC §41, “as that section was enacted on December 31, 2011, irrespective of any subsequent changes,” shall govern the determination of the state income tax credit.1

It is essential to distinguish between the reference date (12/31/2011) and the application date. This fixed-date reference applies only to expenses incurred for qualified research activities after December 31, 2012.1 This timing directly correlates with the enactment of Act 270 (Session Laws of Hawaii 2013), which reenacted and fundamentally restructured the credit program after a period of uncertainty.5

2.2 Qualified High Technology Business (QHTB) Eligibility

The credit is allowed exclusively to a “qualified high technology business” (QHTB) subject to Hawaii’s income tax.1 This specialized definition imposes strict requirements beyond simple engagement in research:

• Required Activity Threshold: To be designated a QHTB, the business must conduct more than fifty per cent of its activities in qualified research.8 This is a substantive test ensuring the credit targets businesses fundamentally dedicated to R&D, not merely those undertaking occasional research projects.
• Broadened Scope of Research: While federal IRC §41(d) definitions are adopted, Hawaii expands the definition of “qualified research” (HRS §235-7.3(c)) to include specific high-technology sectors deemed critical to the state’s economy, such as the development and design of computer software, biotechnology, performing arts products, sensor and optic technologies, ocean sciences, astronomy, and nonfossil fuel energy.8
• Size Limitation: The business must satisfy a size restriction, having no more than 500 employees.11
• Prerequisite for Federal Claim: The statute mandates that in order to qualify for the Hawaii TCRA, the QHTB must also claim a federal tax credit for the same qualified research activities under IRC §41.3 If the federal credit is not claimed, the state credit is automatically disallowed.3

2.3 The Critical Limitation: In-State Expenses Only

A primary state modification to the federal scheme is the strict geographical limitation on eligible expenditures. The statute explicitly mandates that qualified research expenses for the Hawaii credit do not include research expenses incurred outside of the State of Hawaii.2

This allocation rule imposes a meticulous tracking mandate on taxpayers, particularly those operating in multiple jurisdictions. Unlike the federal credit, which applies nationwide, Hawaii requires rigorous internal accounting to isolate QREs based purely on the physical location of the research activities. For multi-state QHTBs, this necessitates detailed expense segregation to ensure that only the costs attributable to personnel performing qualified services, supplies consumed, or computers leased within Hawaii are included in the state expense calculation.3 This accurate localization of activity is vital, as the Hawaii QREs serve as the numerator in the allocation ratio used to determine the final state credit amount.

Section 3: The Base Amount Transformation (Pre- and Post-Act 270)

The most significant legislative variable affecting the economic value of the Hawaii TCRA is the state’s fluctuating position on the incremental nature of the credit, which pivoted dramatically with the enactment of Act 270 in 2013.

3.1 The Pre-2013 Policy: The Non-Incremental Approach

Prior to the restructuring introduced by Act 270 (which applied to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012), the Hawaii statute operated under a far more advantageous structure for taxpayers. The initial wording of HRS §235-110.91 explicitly provided that references to the base amount in IRC §41 “shall not apply,” allowing the credit to be taken for all qualified research expenses without regard to the amount of expenses for previous years.1

During this non-incremental period, the calculation methodology was comparatively simple: the credit was often determined by applying a flat percentage, frequently cited as 20% (as seen in some tax forms from that era), directly against the eligible Hawaii QREs.6 This approach delivered substantial benefits to QHTBs, rewarding both new and sustained, ongoing research investment without the need for year-over-year expenditure growth.

3.2 Act 270 (SLH 2013) and the Policy Reversal

Act 270, Session Laws of Hawaii 2013, which re-established the TCRA for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012, introduced a fundamental shift by aligning Hawaii’s calculation methodology with the incremental structure of the federal credit.5

The law now significantly adopts the base amount as set forth under IRC §41(c), ensuring that only the increasing incremental amounts are eligible for the credit.5 This critical policy pivot was officially documented and clarified by the Department of Taxation (DOTAX) in Tax Information Release (TIR) 2013-02.3

This legislative change reflected a change in state economic development priorities. By adopting the incremental base, the legislature transformed the credit from a subsidy for maintaining a stable technology presence into an incentive designed explicitly to stimulate R&D expansion. A QHTB with stable research spending (e.g., $1 million annually) that had historically received a large credit now found that if its expenses did not exceed the required base amount, the incremental calculation would yield little or no state credit. This shift tightened fiscal controls and re-aligned the program’s subsidy with the economic goal of encouraging new investment and growth within the state’s technology sector.13

3.3 The Mandatory Post-2012 Calculation Model

Following Act 270, the operative method for calculating the Hawaii TCRA relies on an allocation ratio that incorporates the federal incremental calculation, effectively scaling the federal benefit to the local activity.9

The structure mandates that the amount of the credit is equal to the amount of the federal tax credit calculated on Form 6765, multiplied by the percentage of eligible research expenses attributable to activities conducted solely in Hawaii.3

The required formula is:

$$\text{Hawaii TCRA} = \text{Federal Tax Credit (Form 6765)} \times \left(\frac{\text{Eligible Hawaii QREs}}{\text{Total Federal QREs}}\right)$$

12

This formula ensures that the Hawaii credit is determined by the federally calculated incremental excess QREs, appropriately translating that incremental benefit according to the proportion of research activities conducted within the state.

Table 1: Evolution of the Hawaii TCRA Calculation (HRS §235-110.91)

Section 4: Local State Revenue Office Guidance and Administrative Compliance

Compliance with the Hawaii TCRA involves shared regulatory oversight between the Department of Taxation (DOTAX), which handles the tax return filing, and the Department of Business, Economic Development, and Tourism (DBEDT), which manages the certification and economic development aspects.

4.1 The DBEDT Certification Mandate (Form N-346A)

The most critical initial compliance hurdle is obtaining certification from DBEDT. This process is necessary to certify that the applicant is a QHTB and to validate the qualified research expenditures claimed.1

• Certification Requirement: Every QHTB must submit a written, certified statement (Form N-346A) identifying any qualified expenditures made and the amount of tax credits claimed. This statement must be submitted to DBEDT before March 31 of the year following the taxable year in which the activity was conducted.3
• Waiver of Claim: The failure to file the certified statement by the March 31 deadline constitutes a waiver of the right to claim the credit.3 This extremely strict administrative deadline, which precedes the typical income tax filing deadline, places immense pressure on taxpayers to finalize their QRE analysis immediately following the close of the tax year.

4.2 The $5 Million Annual Cap and Rationing System

Hawaii imposes a strict fiscal control on the TCRA: the total amount of certified credits is limited to $5,000,000 in the aggregate for all taxpayers in any given taxable year.6

• Rationing Rule: DBEDT manages this limitation through a strict first-come, first-served basis for certification.6 Once the annual cap is reached, DBEDT is required to immediately discontinue certification of additional claims.1
• Strategic Risk: The combination of a fixed, relatively small annual cap and the first-come, first-served rule introduces significant systemic risk for QHTBs. Businesses must strategically prioritize their application to DBEDT (Form N-346A) to secure their share of the cap before it is exhausted. The administrative hurdle of certification and securing the allocation is, therefore, an arguably more immediate strategic threat to claiming the benefit than the eventual audit risk associated with the DOTAX calculation.14 This policy inherently favors companies with mature, swift internal accounting systems capable of meeting the stringent March 31 deadline.

4.3 DOTAX Filing and Post-Certification Requirements (Form N-346)

Once the DBEDT certification (Form N-346A) is secured, the taxpayer must file Form N-346 (Tax Credit for Research Activities) along with the certification and the federal Form 6765, attaching them to their corporate or personal income tax return.3

• Audit Authority: Notwithstanding DBEDT’s role in certification, the Director of Taxation maintains the authority to audit and adjust the final tax credit amount to ensure compliance with the facts and the law.1
• Final Claim Deadline: The ultimate deadline to claim the credit, including amended claims, is 12 months after the close of the taxable year.3
• Annual Survey: Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012, QHTBs that claim the credit must also complete and file an annual survey prescribed by DBEDT before June 30 of the calendar year following the claim. This survey collects specific data on Hawaii employment, wage data, intellectual property (patents, copyrights), and expenditures to allow the state to measure the program’s effectiveness.1

4.4 The Refundable Nature of the TCRA

A key feature contributing to the credit’s value is its refundability. If the amount of the credit exceeds the taxpayer’s net income tax liability (if any) imposed for the taxable year, the difference is refunded to the taxpayer.3 This mechanism ensures that even startup or growth-stage QHTBs that are operating in a net loss position can immediately realize the full economic benefit of the incentive.

Table 2: Hawaii R&D Tax Credit Compliance Timeline and Requirements

Section 5: Practical Application and Calculation Example

The following example illustrates the mandatory incremental calculation methodology required for tax years beginning after December 31, 2012, adhering strictly to the fixed IRC §41 (2011) principles and utilizing the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) method.

5.1 Scenario Setup: QHTB Alpha Robotics (Tax Year 2015)

Alpha Robotics, certified as a QHTB engaged in developing sensor technologies, satisfies all employee thresholds and registration requirements.8 Since the tax year is 2015, the calculation is governed by Act 270, requiring the incremental base calculation.5 Alpha Robotics elects the ASC Method, which utilizes the 14% rate defined under the 2011 IRC framework.4

Data Summary for Tax Year 2015:

• Current Year (2015) Total Federal QREs (Worldwide): $2,000,000
• Average QREs (2012–2014): $1,200,000
• Current Year QREs conducted in Hawaii (HI QREs): $1,500,000
• Hawaii Net Income Tax Liability: $75,000

5.2 Step 1: Determining the Federal Incremental Credit (IRC §41 (2011) ASC)

The first step requires Alpha Robotics to compute the federal incremental credit they are entitled to claim, as this figure forms the basis for the Hawaii calculation.

1. Calculate the Base Amount: Under the ASC method (IRC §41(c)(5) as of 2011), the base amount is 50% of the average QREs for the three preceding tax years.5
   $$\text{Base Amount} = 50\% \times \$1,200,000 = \$600,000$$
2. Calculate Incremental QREs: The incremental amount is the excess of current QREs over the Base Amount.
   
   $$\text{Incremental QREs} = \$2,000,000 – \$600,000 = \$1,400,000$$
3. Calculate Federal Credit: The incremental QREs are multiplied by the applicable ASC rate, which was 14% under the 2011 version of the law.4
   $$\text{Federal Credit} = \$1,400,000 \times 14\% = \textbf{\$196,000}$$

5.3 Step 2: Calculating the Hawaii Tax Credit (TCRA)

Once the federal incremental credit is established, the Hawaii TCRA is calculated using the statutorily required allocation ratio, ensuring that only in-state activity is rewarded.

1. Calculate the Allocation Ratio: This ratio measures the proportion of total research expenses conducted within Hawaii.3
   $$\text{Allocation Ratio} = \frac{\text{HI QREs}}{\text{Total Federal QREs}} = \frac{\$1,500,000}{\$2,000,000} = 0.75 \text{ or } 75\%$$
2. Calculate Hawaii TCRA: The Federal Credit is scaled by the Allocation Ratio.12
   $$\text{Hawaii TCRA} = \text{Federal Credit} \times \text{Allocation Ratio} = \$196,000 \times 0.75 = \textbf{\$147,000}$$

5.4 Step 3: Credit Application and Refundability

The determined Hawaii TCRA of $147,000 is applied against the taxpayer’s liability. Since Alpha Robotics has a Net Income Tax Liability of $75,000, that liability is fully offset by the credit.3 Due to the refundable nature of the credit 5, the remaining excess amount is issued as a refund.

$$\text{Refund Due} = \text{Hawaii TCRA} – \text{Net Income Tax Liability} = \$147,000 – \$75,000 = \textbf{\$72,000}$$

Table 3: Hypothetical Hawaii R&D Credit Calculation (2015 Tax Year)

Conclusion: Key Takeaways for Compliance and Strategy

The Hawaii Tax Credit for Research Activities (TCRA) is a sophisticated incentive demanding technical expertise in navigating fixed-date conformity and complex administrative procedures. Successful compliance requires adherence to three strategic imperatives:

1. Adherence to the Fixed-Date Law: Taxpayers must diligently apply the definitions and calculation methods of IRC §41 as they existed on December 31, 2011, for all expenses incurred after December 31, 2012. This requires maintaining separate documentation and performing “ghost” federal calculations based on potentially outdated federal tax law to satisfy state reporting standards, ensuring that the base amount and QRE definitions conform to the specific 2011 snapshot.1
2. Mastery of Incremental and Allocation Methodology: The post-2012 requirement, established by Act 270 and clarified in TIR 2013-02, mandates that the credit must be calculated incrementally, rewarding only expenditure increases over a historical base.5 Furthermore, multi-jurisdictional businesses must institute rigorous, granular accounting controls to accurately segregate and document QREs based purely on the physical location of the research activity within Hawaii, as this state-specific allocation dictates the magnitude of the final refundable credit.3
3. Prioritization of Administrative Deadlines: The combination of the $5 million annual aggregate cap and the strict, first-come, first-served DBEDT certification deadline of March 31 creates a high-stakes competition for the available credit pool.1 For QHTBs, securing the Form N-346A certification and reserving a portion of the credit cap must be managed as a critical, time-sensitive administrative process that precedes, and is ultimately more critical than, the final state income tax filing. Failure to meet this early certification deadline results in an automatic forfeiture of the credit, regardless of technical eligibility.3

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/