The Critical Compliance Nexus: Understanding the QHTB Annual Survey and Hawaii’s R&D Tax Credit (HRS §235-110.91)

The Qualified High Technology Business (QHTB) Annual Survey is a mandatory electronic report administered by the Department of Business, Economic Development, and Tourism (DBEDT) to collect detailed economic and operational data from certified businesses claiming the Hawaii Research Activities Tax Credit (TCRA). Failure to submit this survey by its strict June 30 deadline results in the statutory waiver and complete forfeiture of the valuable refundable tax credit.

I. Executive Summary: The Dual Mandate of the QHTB Annual Survey

The Hawaii Tax Credit for Research Activities (TCRA), codified under Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) §235-110.91, is the State of Hawaii’s primary mechanism to incentivize high-technology businesses to invest in innovative R&D within its borders.1 The program offers a crucial refundable income tax credit, meaning that credit amounts exceeding the taxpayer’s liability are paid directly as cash.1 This feature makes the credit uniquely beneficial, providing essential non-dilutive capital that fuels high-tech company growth and maximizes the intended economic stimulus. However, accessing this benefit requires meticulous adherence to a dual compliance structure involving both the Department of Taxation (DOTAX) and the Department of Business, Economic Development, and Tourism (DBEDT).

A. Overview of the Tax Credit for Research Activities (TCRA)

The TCRA is structured to mirror the federal credit established under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) §41. The state credit amount is calculated based on the total federal credit derived from research activities, which is then prorated by the percentage of qualified research expenses (QREs) attributable to activities performed exclusively in Hawaii.2 This direct linkage ensures that only activities meeting the rigorous federal “four-part test” for qualified research are eligible for the state incentive.

The refundable nature of the credit elevates the compliance stakes considerably. Since the state is effectively issuing cash disbursements, the government necessitates strict certification and exhaustive reporting requirements, which are managed through DBEDT. Compliance is viewed not merely as a matter of tax filing, but as an ongoing statutory obligation to provide evidence of the program’s defined public benefit.

II. Statutory Foundation and Program Mechanics of the Hawaii TCRA

A. HRS §235-110.91: Legislative Intent and High-Level Parameters

The TCRA targets businesses engaged in high-technology sectors deemed vital to Hawaii’s economic diversification, including biotechnology, software development, ocean sciences, and astronomy.2 The program operates under specific legislative limitations designed to control fiscal exposure and ensure focused investment.

1. Program Duration and Aggregate Cap

Following the enactment of Act 139 (SLH 2024), the program was extended and is now available for claims made through December 31, 2029.4 However, the core mechanism governing the distribution of the credit remains highly restrictive: the total aggregate amount of credits certified by DBEDT across all taxpayers in any given tax year is capped at $5,000,000.4

The law mandates that certification is issued on a strict first-come, first-served basis.2 This allocation method introduces a significant element of competition and time-sensitivity into the compliance process. Data from prior years demonstrates the severity of this constraint: in the 2020–2023 tax years, the total tax credit claimed by applicants ranged from $11.9 million to $13.3 million, significantly exceeding the $5 million maximum amount that could be certified.8 This high demand relative to the cap underscores the vital importance of timely preparation and submission of the initial certification application (Form N-346A) by the March 31 deadline. Strategic tax planning must treat the application submission as a competitive race, as any delay risks disqualification due to the cap being exhausted, regardless of the QHTB’s intrinsic merit or subsequent compliance with the Annual Survey.

2. Mandatory Federal Linkage

A fundamental statutory requirement is that for a QHTB to claim the Hawaii credit, it must also claim the corresponding federal tax credit for the same qualified research activities under IRC §41.9 This ensures that the qualified research expenses (QREs) used to calculate the Hawaii credit are consistent with, and validated by, federal standards. The Hawaii credit is designed to supplement the federal incentive, not replace it, ensuring a unified standard for defining “qualified research.”

B. Defining the Qualified High Technology Business (QHTB)

Eligibility for the TCRA is strictly confined to entities that meet the definition of a QHTB. Act 139 (SLH 2024), effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2023, refined this definition, incorporating stricter limits.6

1. Small Business Criterion

The QHTB must be classified as a small business, which is defined as a company employing no more than 500 employees.2 This limit is intended to ensure the credit primarily benefits smaller, high-growth enterprises that require state support to scale their innovative research.

2. Activity Test

A business must conduct more than 50% of its activities in qualified research in Hawaii.10 This stringent threshold ensures that the tax credit is not claimed by companies that conduct minimal R&D locally but benefit primarily from out-of-state operations. It reinforces the state’s focus on encouraging substantial, locally centered research investment.

3. Registration Requirement

The business must be formally registered to do business within the State of Hawaii.6

III. The QHTB Annual Survey: The Pillar of Continuous Compliance

The QHTB Annual Survey, administered by DBEDT, represents a critical, ongoing compliance step. It is not an ancillary request for information but a formal, statutory prerequisite for eligibility, enforceable with a severe penalty.

A. The Legal Imperative and Filing Requirements

1. The Mandatory Requirement

Effective since July 1, 2013, the statute explicitly states that QHTBs claiming the credit MUST complete and file an annual survey.3 This requirement, executed on electronic forms prepared and prescribed by DBEDT, is a prerequisite listed within the instructions for claiming the tax credit.7 It extends the compliance obligation well past the date of tax filing.

2. The Critical Deadline

The electronic survey must be filed BEFORE June 30 of the calendar year immediately following the calendar year in which the tax credit is claimed.3 For instance, a claim made for the 2024 tax year must be supported by a survey filed before June 30, 2025. This timeline is vital because the June 30 deadline falls after the March 31 DBEDT certification application date 4 and, in many cases, after the taxpayer has filed their state tax return.

3. Consequences of Non-Filing

The statute imposes an absolute consequence for non-compliance: failure to satisfy the annual survey requirement shall constitute a waiver of the right to claim the credit.7 This provision effectively guarantees the loss of the certified credit, even if the QHTB successfully secured its allocation under the $5 million cap and reported valid QREs. The explicit statutory waiver makes the QHTB vulnerable to audit and subsequent recapture of the credit amount previously claimed.2 This severe penalty reinforces the state’s position that the QHTB has an ongoing, non-waivable administrative obligation to DBEDT, separate from the filing obligations to DOTAX.

B. Policy Function: Data Collected and Economic Impact Reporting

The survey’s primary purpose is governmental accountability. It provides the state, specifically DBEDT, with the detailed data necessary to produce mandated reports (pursuant to Act 261) that summarize the activities and characteristics of QHTBs.10 This data is essential for justifying the continuation of the program, assessing its economic performance, and informing future legislative changes. The level of detail required far surpasses standard tax compliance forms.

1. Detailed Economic Metrics

The data collected focuses heavily on quantifying the QHTB’s local economic contribution.10 Key metrics required include:

• Total revenue generated from goods and services produced in Hawaii.
• Total operating costs spent locally.
• Detailed payroll expenses, including amounts for fringe benefits, health insurance, and employment taxes associated with Hawaii W-2 employees.12
• The number of employees in regular positions (full-time and part-time), as well as the proportion of research jobs relative to total employment.10
• The dollar amount of Hawaii corporate income tax paid.12

2. Research Focus and Innovation Output

The survey also gauges the nature and output of the research itself. QHTBs must report on the specific areas of research conducted (e.g., computer software, biotechnology, architectural design, agricultural seeds, or ocean sciences).10 Additionally, businesses must report the number of patents owned or pending, the history of their research activities, and the years they have claimed the TCRA.10 This information helps the state verify that the incentive is driving legitimate, measurable technological innovation.

3. Measuring Additionality

A strategic component of the survey requires the QHTB to provide a self-reported assessment of the impact of the state tax credit on its research spending.10 The business must estimate how much research expense would have been made had the state tax credit not been available. This data attempts to measure the concept of “additionality”—determining whether the tax incentive truly spurs new investment that would otherwise not occur, thereby ensuring the public subsidy is effective.

The structure of the QHTB Annual Survey, coupled with the severe penalty for non-compliance, functions as the government’s direct mechanism for program accountability. If a QHTB fails to provide this comprehensive data on jobs created, revenue generated, and innovation fostered, the state cannot measure the public return on its investment and, therefore, rescinds the subsidy.

The following table summarizes the key data points required, illustrating the depth of reporting expected by DBEDT:

Key Data Points Collected by the QHTB Annual Survey (DBEDT)

IV. Local State Revenue Office Guidance and Application of Law

The successful claiming and retention of the Hawaii TCRA requires navigating the administrative requirements of two separate state agencies: DBEDT, which handles qualification, and DOTAX, which handles income tax processing.

A. Bifurcated Administration: DBEDT (Certification) vs. DOTAX (Claiming)

The administration of the TCRA is managed through a statutorily defined partnership between these two agencies. This division of responsibility requires businesses to coordinate efforts and meet distinct requirements for each office.

1. DBEDT’s Role (Certification and Compliance)

DBEDT holds the gatekeeper function. It is responsible for reviewing the application to confirm QHTB status, certifying the amount of qualified research costs, and issuing the official certification statement (Form N-346A).2 Crucially, DBEDT manages the $5 million annual aggregate cap, allocating the credit on a first-come, first-served basis.2 DBEDT also administers the QHTB Annual Survey and is responsible for enforcing the consequences of non-filing.

2. DOTAX’s Role (Processing and Auditing)

The Department of Taxation (DOTAX) is the revenue office that processes the final credit claim against the taxpayer’s income tax liability. The QHTB must file Form N-346 (Tax Credit for Research Activities), attaching the certified Form N-346A from DBEDT, along with their state tax return.9 DOTAX maintains standard tax administrative and enforcement powers, including the right to audit the QREs claimed and verify compliance with state tax law.2

B. Critical Compliance Timelines and Required Forms

Maintaining eligibility requires strict adherence to three key annual deadlines:

1. Certification Application (Form N-346A): Submission is required by March 31 following the close of the taxable year.4 This date is critical for securing the business’s place under the $5 million statewide cap.
2. QHTB Annual Survey (Electronic Form): Filing must occur BEFORE June 30 of the calendar year following the claim year.3 This is the administrative requirement that, if missed, results in the complete waiver of the credit.
3. Final Tax Claim (Form N-346): The ultimate deadline to claim the credit, including amended claims, is 12 months after the close of the taxable year.3

The scheduling of these deadlines demands proactive management. The critical June 30 survey date necessitates that financial and legal teams maintain continuous oversight, even after the initial tax return is filed.

Regulatory Compliance Deadlines for Hawaii TCRA (Applicable Post-Act 139)

C. Analyzing Act 139, SLH 2024: Reinstatement of the Base Amount

For taxable years beginning before January 1, 2024, the Hawaii TCRA offered a powerful advantage: it permitted the credit to be claimed for all qualified research expenses incurred in Hawaii without regard to the federal base amount.9 This historical provision effectively treated the Hawaii credit as a subsidy on gross QREs, not just incremental QREs, offering significant financial support to companies with stable, ongoing research operations.

1. The Repeal of the Advantage

Act 139, Session Laws of Hawaii 2024, fundamentally changed this calculation methodology.6 For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2023, Act 139 explicitly repealed the provision that previously disregarded the federal base amount.6

2. Implications for Calculation

The repeal mandates that QHTBs must now align their Hawaii credit calculation directly with the standard federal methodology under IRC §41. This requires calculating the federal base amount—which is the greater of the fixed-base percentage (derived from historic gross receipts) or 50% of the current year’s QREs—and subtracting it from current QREs to determine the excess QREs.2

This shift alters the financial viability of R&D investment in Hawaii. Prior to 2024, sustained R&D was rewarded generously. Now, to maximize the credit, QHTBs must demonstrate significant growth in R&D spending year-over-year that exceeds the historic or statutory base amount. The incentive is no longer a broad subsidy but is focused strictly on encouraging incremental research investment in the state. This necessitates immediate and proactive strategic tax planning to understand how a company’s historical spending patterns affect its future Hawaii credit eligibility.

V. Calculation Methodology and Worked Example

The calculation of the Hawaii TCRA involves computing the federal credit (now including the base amount) and then scaling that credit down based on the fraction of research performed in Hawaii.

A. Federal Calculation Prerequisite (IRC §41)

The QHTB must first complete the federal calculation using the methodology prescribed by IRC §41, typically reported on IRS Form 6765.2

1. Determining the Base Amount

In the post-2023 environment, the base amount calculation for Hawaii mirrors the federal requirement. It is determined by the greater of (a) the fixed-base percentage (calculated from past QREs and gross receipts) multiplied by the average annual gross receipts from the four preceding tax years, or (b) 50% of the current year’s QREs.2

2. Calculating Excess QREs and Federal Credit

The Federal Excess QREs are derived by subtracting the Base Amount from the Current Year Total Federal QREs.2 The resulting Total Federal R&D Credit is calculated by applying the regular research credit rate (e.g., 20%) to the excess QREs.2

B. The Hawaii Allocation Formula

Once the total federal credit is established, the Hawaii-specific credit is determined by prorating that amount using a ratio of in-state QREs to total global QREs.3 Hawaii QREs are strictly limited to expenses incurred for research activities conducted within the state.9

$$\text{Hawaii TCRA} = \text{Total Federal R\&D Credit} \times \left( \frac{\text{Hawaii QREs}}{\text{Total Federal QREs}} \right) [2, 3]$$

C. Practical Numerical Example: Impact of Act 139 (Post-2023 Tax Year)

To illustrate the consequences of the base amount reinstatement, consider a hypothetical QHTB, “Aloha Tech Inc.,” for its 2024 tax year, which begins after December 31, 2023.

Scenario Assumptions: Aloha Tech Inc. maintains stable, high R&D spending, meaning its current QREs do not drastically exceed its historical base.

• Current Year Total Federal QREs (Global): $1,000,000
• QREs Incurred Exclusively in Hawaii (Hawaii QREs): $750,000 (75% of total QREs)
• Calculated Federal Fixed Base Amount (based on historical gross receipts): $400,000
• Federal Regular Credit Rate: 20%

Application of Act 139/IRC §41 Base:

The Federal QRE Base Amount is the greater of (1) the fixed base ($400,000) or (2) 50% of current QREs ($1,000,000 $\times$ 50% = $500,000). The base amount used is $500,000.2

Hypothetical Hawaii TCRA Calculation Example (Post-Act 139)

Comparative Analysis: If this calculation had been performed for a tax year beginning before 2024, the Hawaii calculation would have disregarded the base amount. In that scenario, the state credit would have been calculated effectively as 20% of the Hawaii QREs, resulting in a credit of $150,000 ($750,000 $\times$ 20%). The post-Act 139 calculation of $75,000 demonstrates a 50% reduction in potential credit value. This highlights that for businesses with consistent R&D spending, the strategic benefit of the Hawaii TCRA has been substantially curtailed, underscoring the shift from a broad subsidy to an incremental investment incentive.

VI. Conclusion and Strategic Compliance Recommendations

The Hawaii Tax Credit for Research Activities remains a valuable, refundable incentive for high-technology innovation, but its utility is inextricably linked to continuous and detailed administrative compliance. The QHTB Annual Survey is the cornerstone of this compliance regime, serving as a non-optional reporting mechanism that ties the corporate tax benefit directly to measurable economic development outcomes.

A. Key Takeaways for Compliance and Strategy

1. The Survey as a Disqualification Trigger: The June 30 QHTB Annual Survey deadline is an absolute administrative barrier. The state has statutory teeth that penalize non-filing with a complete waiver of the credit.7 This means that compliance efforts cannot cease after the initial March 31 certification; continuous internal governance must prioritize the timely completion of the survey to avoid losing access to secured funds.
2. Increased Calculation Complexity Post-2023: Act 139 has fundamentally altered the financial landscape of the TCRA by mandating the federal base amount calculation.6 Taxpayers must now meticulously track historical financial data—including four years of gross receipts and QREs—to accurately determine the required incremental spending threshold. Companies focused on steady, sustained research must adjust their expectations, as the credit will only reward spending that significantly exceeds their calculated base.
3. Strategic Focus on DBEDT Metrics: The granular data collected by DBEDT via the Annual Survey on wages, patents, and estimated additionality 10 is used to prepare reports that directly influence legislative review of the program.10 The program’s sunset date of December 31, 2029 5, will only be extended if these reports demonstrate sufficient economic return. QHTBs should manage their research and hiring activities with an understanding that favorable economic impact metrics (such as increasing local wages and patent filings) bolster the case for extending the TCRA, thereby preserving the long-term viability of the program.

B. Final Compliance Checklist

To ensure sustained access to the refundable Hawaii Tax Credit for Research Activities, QHTBs must integrate the following critical steps into their annual tax calendars:

• Certification Application: Submit Form N-346A to DBEDT by March 31 to secure allocation under the aggregate cap.4
• Annual Survey: Complete and file the electronic QHTB Annual Survey with DBEDT BEFORE June 30 following the tax year to satisfy the mandatory administrative requirement and avoid statutory waiver.3
• Credit Claim: File Form N-346, attaching the certified N-346A, with the Hawaii tax return by the deadline of 12 months after the close of the taxable year.7
• Documentation: Retain all supporting records for QREs and business activities for at least four years, prepared for examination by both DBEDT (for compliance and economic data) and DOTAX (for tax liability confirmation).2

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/