Comprehensive Analysis of the Qualified High Technology Business (QHTB) Employee Limit and its Calculation for the Hawaii R&D Tax Credit

I. Executive Summary: The QHTB Employee Threshold

The meaning of QHTB Full-Time or Part-Time Employees Limit (500) is that a Qualified High Technology Business (QHTB) must be defined as a small business with no more than 500 employees to be eligible for the refundable Hawaii Research Activities Tax Credit (HRS §235-110.91).1 Since the relevant statute mandates reporting of both full-time and part-time employees, compliance necessitates calculating the total labor input using the Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) method, based on total annual hours worked, to properly aggregate all employment for the size determination.2

Detailed Analysis of the Statutory Context

The Hawaii Tax Credit for Research Activities (TCRA), codified under Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) §235-110.91, serves as a significant economic incentive for innovation within the state.3 It offers a refundable tax credit against Hawaii income tax for qualified research activities (QRA) conducted by certified QHTBs.4 Certification is managed by the Department of Business, Economic Development, and Tourism (DBEDT), while the credit is claimed with the Department of Taxation (DOTAX).3

This credit carries exceptionally high value due to its refundable nature, allowing excess credit amounts to be paid in cash, but it is constrained by two major administrative factors 4:

1. The credit is subject to a competitive $5 million annual aggregate cap.4
2. Allocations are awarded on a first-come, first-served basis, requiring meticulous timing and accurate documentation during the annual certification application window.4

The statutory framework for the TCRA was significantly revised by Act 139, Session Laws of Hawaii (SLH) 2024. Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2023, Act 139 extended the credit’s sunset date to December 31, 2029 1 and introduced critical changes that fundamentally redefined eligibility criteria for QHTBs.

II. Statutory Foundation of the Hawaii R&D Tax Credit (HRS §235-110.91)

A. Critical Changes Introduced by Act 139, SLH 2024

Act 139 enacted two major changes that increase the complexity and narrow the scope of the Hawaii R&D credit:

1. Reinstatement of the Federal Base Amount Calculation

Act 139 repealed the previous state provision that allowed credits to be claimed for all qualified research expenses without regard to the base amount calculation required under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) §41.5 Taxpayers are now required to utilize the more complex base amount calculation method mandated by federal law, which requires tracking historical qualified research expenditures (QREs) to determine the incremental increase eligible for the credit.4

2. Imposition of the Small Business Size Test

The most significant change related to entity qualification is the requirement that QHTBs must now meet a size limitation. Act 139 narrowed the qualifying criteria by amending the definition of a “qualified high technology business” to specifically require the entity to be a small business.1 A small business is explicitly defined as a company that has no more than 500 employees.1

The simultaneous reintroduction of the complex IRC §41 base amount calculation and the imposition of a strict 500-employee limit demonstrates a considered legislative approach. This structure ensures that the valuable, capped, and refundable tax credit is directed solely toward genuinely smaller, qualified enterprises that possess the compliance infrastructure necessary to navigate complex federal tax methodologies. By raising the qualification standard and simultaneously introducing a hard size cap, the state legislature has confirmed its objective: targeted support for smaller high-technology entities, requiring robust compliance documentation for access to the incentive.

III. Definitional Analysis: The “Small Business” Employee Limit (500)

A. Linking QHTB to “Small Business” and Activity Requirements

Prior to Act 139, qualification as a QHTB primarily rested on the nature of the business activities. HRS §235-7.3(c) defines a QHTB as a business that conducts more than fifty per cent (50%) of its activities in qualified research.7 This research must fall within defined high-technology sectors such as biotechnology, software development, ocean sciences, or astronomy.7

Act 139 layered the size constraint onto this activity definition. Consequently, a business must satisfy two primary tests to achieve QHTB certification:

1. Activity Test: Greater than 50% of activities conducted in qualified research within Hawaii.4
2. Size Test: Must be a small business defined as having no more than 500 employees.1

Both DBEDT and DOTAX guidance reiterate that a Hawaii-registered company must satisfy these size and activity requirements to obtain the necessary annual certification.4

B. Statutory Context of Employee Definition and Reporting Mandate

Compliance relies heavily on the definition of an “employee” and the nature of the labor input data required by the state.

1. Federal Conformity on Employee Definition

For purposes of Chapter 235 (Hawaii Income Tax Law), the definition of “Employee” means the same as in the Internal Revenue Code.8 This direct linkage to federal tax standards suggests that the state intended to adopt the established definitions of employer-employee relationships used for W-2 withholding and payroll purposes, rather than creating a unique state definition.9

2. Reporting Requirement for Full-Time and Part-Time Employees

Crucially, the statutory compliance obligations confirm that the simple total headcount approach is insufficient. HRS §235-110.91 mandates that a QHTB claiming the credit must file an annual survey with DBEDT that includes specific employment and wage data.2 This data must include “the numbers of full-time and part-time employees retained, new jobs, temporary positions, external services procured by the business, and payroll taxes”.2

The explicit requirement to report the breakdown of both full-time (FT) and part-time (PT) employees demonstrates that the state tracks labor input differences. This mandatory reporting structure makes a calculation based on simple gross headcount (which treats a full-time executive and a part-time administrative assistant identically) vulnerable to regulatory challenge, as it fails to distinguish the actual aggregate scale of the business’s workforce.

IV. Comprehensive Guidance on Employee Calculation: Necessity of the Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Method

The greatest compliance challenge posed by the new 500-employee limit is the silence from the state revenue offices regarding the precise methodology for calculating the count, particularly how to properly treat part-time employees.6 To navigate this regulatory gap, taxpayers must adopt a technically sound methodology consistent with established tax jurisprudence and internal state tax practice.

A. Rejecting the Simple Headcount Method

The simplest, yet riskiest, method is the simple headcount, where every individual issued a W-2 during the tax year counts as one unit, regardless of hours worked. If an organization employs 499 full-time workers and two part-time workers, the simple headcount is 501, resulting in immediate disqualification.

This approach is legally unsound because it ignores the statutory directive to report the specific numbers of both “full-time and part-time employees retained”.2 Furthermore, it provides an inaccurate measure of the business’s actual size and resource consumption compared to an entity composed primarily of full-time employees.

B. Justification for the Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Methodology

The Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) method aggregates the total compensated hours worked by all employees (FT and PT) over the year and converts them into a representative measure of full-time staff. This method is the recognized standard in federal law for determining business size in tax contexts.

1. The Federal Standard of Measurement

The standard federal measure for a full-time employee is generally defined as 2,080 compensated hours per year (40 hours per week $\times$ 52 weeks).11 The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) employs this hour-based calculation for various tax thresholds, such as determining eligibility for the Small Business Health Care Tax Credit.11 The FTE calculation involves dividing the total aggregate hours worked by all employees by the 2,080-hour baseline:

$$\text{Total FTEs} = \frac{\text{Total Annual Compensated Hours by All Employees}}{2,080}$$

This calculation often includes a rounding rule, typically rounding down to the next lowest whole number, to align with federal practice.11

2. Internal Consistency with QHTB Qualification Precedent

The most compelling legal basis for adopting the FTE methodology in Hawaii is its consistency with the established standards for QHTB certification itself. To qualify, a business must satisfy the Activity Test—that is, conducting more than 50% of its activities in qualified research.4

Past administrative guidance from Hawaii’s tax authorities demonstrates that the determination of this 50% activity threshold relies on a time method, which specifically aggregates the total annual labor hours devoted to qualified research by all employees and assets against the total annual operational hours of the company.12 For example, in calculating whether the 50% threshold is met, the state aggregates individual employee hours (e.g., 500 hours for Employee A and 2,000 hours for Employee B) to determine the total percentage of qualified time.12

It is highly improbable that the State of Hawaii would require one specific measure of labor input complexity (aggregated hours) for the Activity Test (the core definition of a QHTB) and then mandate a simpler, less representative measure (simple headcount) for the Size Test (the 500-employee limit). Adopting the FTE method, which is rooted in aggregated hours, ensures legal and methodological consistency across both core QHTB qualification requirements. This approach mitigates the risk of an auditor challenging the calculation based on inconsistency between the size test and the activity test methodology.

C. Timing and Scope of Measurement

For compliance purposes, the 500-employee limit applies for the entire taxable year in which the credit is claimed.

• Measurement Period: Because the FTE calculation is based on aggregate annual hours, the measurement should be the average FTE count over the entire taxable year. Using the average avoids distortions from temporary high seasonal employment or year-end staffing fluctuations.
• Scope: The count includes all W-2 employees of the qualifying entity. While the state references the IRC definition of “employee” 8, prudence dictates that the calculation must also consider federal aggregation rules, particularly regarding related parties (e.g., businesses with common ownership), which might require consolidating employee counts across multiple legal entities to determine the ultimate size of the “small business” for tax purposes.

V. Administrative and Compliance Obligations

The implementation of the 500-employee limit directly impacts the annual certification process and subsequent compliance audits carried out by DBEDT and DOTAX.

A. DBEDT’s Certification Role and Verification

DBEDT is responsible for reviewing applications and verifying that a business meets the statutory QHTB criteria—including the 500-employee size test—before issuing the required certificate.4

The application process involves submitting Form N-346A and a questionnaire, typically during a specified window (e.g., March 3–31, 2025, for the credit year).4 DBEDT’s review explicitly focuses on verifying the company’s size requirement.6 Critically, DBEDT has noted that it may contact filers for expense and payroll documentation upon request.6 This confirms that a detailed, hours-based payroll record, which serves as the foundation for the FTE calculation, is the necessary documentation to defend the 500-employee compliance threshold under audit.

B. Mandatory Reporting via the Annual Survey

The statutory requirement for the annual survey filed with DBEDT reinforces the need for meticulous labor input tracking. The survey requires reporting the numbers of full-time and part-time employees retained, among other key economic data points.2

The collection of this granular data serves multiple purposes, including monitoring the economic impact of the credit and providing the necessary detail for subsequent verification of the 500-employee limit. If a business were to use a simple headcount calculation, the discrepancy between that number and the detailed FT/PT breakdown provided in the mandatory survey would create an immediate audit flag, suggesting a failure to correctly apply the size limitation.

VI. Practical Example: Calculating the FTE Limit for QHTB Qualification

A practical example demonstrates why the FTE method is mandatory for businesses employing a mixed workforce and how the method prevents the immediate disqualification that would result from a simple headcount.

A. Scenario Baseline

A Hawaii technology firm seeks QHTB certification for the 2024 tax year. The baseline for one full-time equivalent (FTE) is calculated at 2,080 compensated hours annually.

B. Labor Input Data

The firm’s total workforce is comprised of 550 individuals across three categories:

C. Analysis of Compliance Methodology

1. Simple Headcount Result

Using the simple headcount method, the company employed a total of 550 individuals. This count exceeds the 500-employee limit and would render the company ineligible for the QHTB tax credit.

2. Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Calculation

The FTE method requires aggregating the total annual compensated hours and converting this labor input into full-time equivalents:

$$\text{Total FTEs} = \frac{1,027,000 \text{ Hours}}{2,080 \text{ Hours/FTE}} \approx 493.75$$

Following standard federal practice, the resulting figure is typically rounded down to the next lowest whole number, yielding 493 FTEs.

D. Compliance Outcome

By calculating the size limit using the prudent FTE methodology, the company demonstrates that its aggregate labor input corresponds to 493 FTEs. Since 493 FTEs is less than 500, the company successfully meets the statutory requirement of being a “small business” and is eligible to apply for QHTB certification.

The significant discrepancy—550 using simple headcount versus 493 using FTE—underscores the necessity of the hours-based calculation. Relying on simple headcount would lead to the total denial of the R&D credit benefit, losing the value of the incentive based purely on a technical qualification error, regardless of the quality of the underlying research or QREs.

VII. Conclusion and Strategic Compliance Recommendations

The restructuring of the Hawaii Research Activities Tax Credit through Act 139, SLH 2024, decisively directs the benefit toward smaller enterprises by imposing a rigid 500-employee cap. For sophisticated taxpayers, the principal challenge is not the limit itself, but the lack of explicit DOTAX guidance on calculation, especially concerning part-time labor.

A. Nuanced Conclusions on the Employee Limit

1. Mandatory FTE Calculation: The analysis confirms that a simple headcount is indefensible for QHTB certification. The only technically sound and low-risk calculation method is the Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) methodology, based on the 2,080-hour annual baseline derived from federal tax standards.8
2. Consistency as Legal Justification: The requirement for the FTE calculation is not merely an analogy to federal law, but is reinforced by the internal consistency of Hawaii’s QHTB statute. The state already requires labor aggregation via hours to satisfy the 50% Activity Test 12, making the FTE calculation for the Size Test the logical and most defensible method for measuring overall business scale.
3. High Stakes Compliance: Because the credit is capped annually at $5 million and awarded on a first-come, first-served basis, the stakes of failure are absolute. Any error in the 500-employee calculation discovered during an audit will result in the total disallowance of the credit claim for that taxable year.

B. Recommendations for Mitigating Audit Risk

To ensure successful QHTB certification and secure the maximum refundable credit, businesses must adopt rigorous internal controls related to employee tracking:

• Establish a Formal FTE Policy: The QHTB must formally document and adopt an FTE calculation policy that utilizes the 2,080-hour baseline and clearly outlines how full-time, part-time, and temporary compensated hours are aggregated across the entire taxable year. This documentation should explicitly reference HRS §235-110.91(j)(4) (reporting FT/PT counts) and the precedent for hour aggregation in the Activity Test as the basis for the calculation.
• Integrate Payroll Tracking: Ensure payroll and HR systems are capable of capturing and reporting the total annual compensated hours for every W-2 employee, facilitating accurate, auditable FTE calculation on a year-round basis.
• Proactive Monitoring of Aggregation: Businesses nearing the 500-FTE threshold must proactively monitor their average FTE count monthly. This diligence is necessary to identify and manage labor changes that could inadvertently push the organization over the limit, potentially jeopardizing eligibility for the entire year’s credit benefit.
• Related Party Review: Given the use of the IRC definition of “employee,” corporate tax counsel should thoroughly review organizational structures to determine if federal aggregation rules apply by analogy, requiring the consolidation of employee counts from related entities to properly assess the 500-employee limit.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/