Navigating the Hawaiʻi Tax Credit for Research Activities (TCRA): Compliance, Calculation, and Strategic Implications

The Tax Credit for Research Activities (TCRA), codified under Hawaiʻi Revised Statutes (HRS) §235-110.91, is a valuable, refundable income tax credit designed to incentivize qualified high-tech businesses to conduct innovation activities within the state. This credit is directly linked to the federal R&D tax credit (Internal Revenue Code, IRC §41), subject to a restrictive annual $5 million aggregate cap, and requires a mandatory, time-sensitive two-step certification process involving the Department of Business, Economic Development, and Tourism (DBEDT) and the Department of Taxation (DoTax).

I. Executive Summary: The Hawaiʻi TCRA Landscape

The Tax Credit for Research Activities (TCRA), under Hawaiʻi Revised Statutes (HRS) §235-110.91, is a refundable income tax credit designed to spur technological advancement by offsetting expenses incurred in qualified research activities within the islands [1, 2].

This incentive is specifically available to businesses classified as “Qualified High Technology Businesses” (QHTBs), which must conduct more than 50% of their operations in qualified research activities in Hawaiʻi [1]. To claim the benefit, a taxpayer must first compute and claim the corresponding federal R&D tax credit and then apply a strict fractional apportionment formula to determine the Hawaiʻi-specific credit amount [3, 4]. Providing a long-term horizon for R&D planning, Act 139 SLH 2024 recently extended the program’s sunset date from December 31, 2024, to December 31, 2029 [5].

II. Statutory Foundation, Eligibility, and Legislative Context

2.1. Legislative Mandate and Purpose (HRS §235-110.91)

The primary legislative intent behind the TCRA is to foster economic diversification and advancement in Hawaiʻi by providing a substantial financial subsidy for high-technology research and development [1, 6]. The foundation of the Hawaiʻi TCRA is explicitly tied to federal tax provisions. HRS §235-110.91 adopts the framework set forth in IRC §41, which governs the federal credit for increasing research activities, and IRC §280C(c), concerning the required expense reduction for which the credit is claimed [4, 7].

Legislative efforts have continually refined the program to address prior issues of oversight and potential misuse. For example, Act 270, which reenacted the TCRA for tax years 2013 to 2019, significantly modified the program by adopting the federal base amount calculation defined under IRC §41(c) [4]. This modification ensures that the state credit, like its federal counterpart, is an incremental credit—meaning only the research expenses that exceed a historical base amount are eligible for the incentive [4]. This measure aimed to enhance the program’s effectiveness by requiring new or increased investment, contrasting with earlier, less targeted legislative efforts that generated significant liability with little measured increase in R&D spending per capita [6].

2.2. Defining the Qualified High Technology Business (QHTB)

Eligibility for the TCRA is limited exclusively to a specific class of taxpayers termed “Qualified High Technology Businesses” (QHTBs). The designation requires two fundamental thresholds to be met. First, the business must be registered to operate within the State of Hawaiʻi [1]. Second, the QHTB must demonstrate that more than 50% of its total activities are conducted within the state and relate directly to qualified research [1].

A major amendment was introduced through Act 139 SLH 2024, which applies to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2023 [5]. This legislation explicitly amends the QHTB definition to restrict eligibility to a “small business,” defined as a company with no more than 500 employees [5, 8]. This restriction represents a targeted policy shift. By imposing an employee ceiling of 500, the state ensures that the limited annual tax expenditure focuses on supporting local, growing technology companies. This targeted approach mitigates the risk that the restrictive $5 million annual credit cap will be immediately consumed by large, multi-state or global corporations that might conduct high volumes of R&D in the state but whose overall economic roots and employment impacts are marginal compared to their larger national footprint.

The definitions of “Qualified Research” and “Qualified Research Expenses” (QREs) utilized for the state credit are borrowed directly from federal law, specifically IRC §41(d) and §41(b), respectively [7]. To qualify, research activities must satisfy the rigorous four-part test: they must be technological in nature, directed toward a permitted purpose (improving functionality, performance, reliability, or quality), intended to eliminate technical uncertainty, and involve a process of experimentation “.

2.3. Linking to Federal Law: The IRC §41 Nexus

The connection between the Hawaiʻi TCRA and the federal R&D tax credit (IRC §41) is a mandatory condition of participation. In order to claim the Hawaiʻi tax credit, the taxpayer must also claim the federal tax credit for increasing research activities under IRC §41 [3, 4]. This prerequisite means that the state claim is inherently dependent on the federal calculation’s integrity and successful filing.

Furthermore, while the definitions of QREs follow the federal standard, the scope of expenses eligible for the state credit is subject to an absolute geographical limitation: Qualified research expenses eligible for the Hawaiʻi credit shall not include research expenses incurred outside of the State [7, 9]. This is a crucial distinction, as only the in-state QREs form the numerator of the apportionment fraction used to calculate the final Hawaiʻi credit amount.

Table 1: Key Requirements and Limitations of the Hawaii TCRA (HRS §235-110.91)

III. The Two-Step Compliance Pathway: DBEDT Certification and DoTax Filing

Successful claim execution for the TCRA is bifurcated, requiring separate, mandatory administrative approvals from both DBEDT and DoTax. This dual compliance pathway introduces unique challenges, particularly concerning timing and documentation integrity.

3.1. DBEDT’s Crucial Role: Application and Certification (The Allocation Gate)

DBEDT serves as the state’s primary gatekeeper, tasked with reviewing, verifying, and certifying all claims for the tax credit “. This certification is a prerequisite before the taxpayer can formally file the claim with DoTax.

The application period for certification occurs in the year following the tax year in which the research was conducted, typically running from early March until the firm deadline of March 31st “.

The Strategic Risk of the Annual Cap

The most critical feature of the DBEDT process is the annual $5 million aggregate cap on the total amount of credits that can be issued “. Certificates are issued on a strictly first-come, first-served basis [1, 12]. The official application date/time is determined by when the completed and signed Form N-346A is successfully received by DBEDT [1, 4].

DBEDT guidance explicitly warns applicants that this cap has been reached almost instantaneously in recent years [1, 12]. For example, in 2022, while 26 filers reported $59.4 million in research spending and claimed $11.9 million in credits, the $5 million cap resulted in only 9 companies being certified “. This quantified oversubscription demonstrates that obtaining the credit is highly competitive and logistical speed is paramount.

Required Documentation for DBEDT

The application is complex, requiring a multi-part submission that must be completed promptly:

1. Part A: Uploading the completed and signed updated Form N-346A. DBEDT emphasizes that older forms will not be accepted [1, 12]. This submission time determines the firm’s place in the “first-come, first-served” queue [1].
2. Part B: Completing the online survey (Questionnaire Pt B (1)) and downloading, completing, and uploading the detailed financial and research data in the accompanying Questionnaire Pt B (2).xls file [1].

Upon satisfactory review, DBEDT signs and returns the approved certificate (Part II of Form N-346A) to the taxpayer, a process often anticipated to be completed around June 30th [1, 4].

3.2. DoTax Filing Procedures and Deadlines (The Audit Gate)

Once certification has been secured from DBEDT, the taxpayer is responsible for filing the approved certificate with the Department of Taxation [1]. The final step of the compliance pathway involves filing three essential documents with the applicable state income tax return (such as Form N-11 or N-20) [4, 11]:

1. Hawaiʻi Form N-346 (Claim for Research Activities Tax Credit) [7].
2. The certified copy of Form N-346A (Part II), which bears DBEDT’s official signature [4].
3. A copy of the corresponding Federal Form 6765 (Credit for Increasing Research Activities) [3, 10].

The final deadline to claim the credit, including amended claims, is strictly 12 months after the close of the taxable year [7, 11]. Flow-through entities (such as partnerships or S corporations) must also attach a list detailing the names, identifying numbers, and allocated or distributive share of the credit for each partner, shareholder, or beneficiary [4, 7].

3.3. Administrative Guidance and Adjustment Requirements

The bifurcated compliance process creates a significant dual compliance risk for QHTBs. The company faces high logistical pressure (timing risk) to submit the N-346A instantly to DBEDT to secure allocation against the annual cap. Simultaneously, it faces intense scrutiny regarding the underlying financial calculations (calculation risk) from DoTax, which will audit the claim based on the certified N-346A and the federal Form 6765. Rushing the preparation to meet the “first-come” deadline must not compromise the meticulous accuracy required for the fractional calculation, which DoTax reviews subsequently.

Furthermore, Hawaiʻi Revised Statutes §235-101(b) imposes a crucial reporting duty on all taxpayers. If the federal taxable income or the federal tax credit amount is changed, corrected, or adjusted by the IRS, the taxpayer must notify DoTax of such change within ninety days of the federal action [10]. This requirement ensures that the state claim, which is mathematically dependent on the federal credit, remains accurate and current throughout any federal audit or adjustment process.

Table 2: TCRA Administrative Deadlines and Agency Responsibilities

IV. Detailed Calculation Methodology and Federal Integration

The calculation of the Hawaiʻi TCRA is unique among state R&D tax credits because it does not operate as a fixed percentage of qualified state expenditures. Instead, it utilizes a fractional apportionment method that ties the state credit directly to the amount of credit computed at the federal level.

4.1. Calculation Overview: The Fractional Apportionment Method

The statutory formula dictates that the Hawaiʻi TCRA is calculated by multiplying the final amount of the federal tax credit by a ratio. This ratio reflects the proportion of qualified research expenses conducted in Hawaiʻi relative to the total qualified research expenses conducted globally that were used to compute the federal credit [4, 10, 11].

The calculation is expressed as follows:

$$TCRA_{HI} = TCRA_{Federal} \times \left(\frac{QREs_{HI}}{QREs_{Federal, Total}}\right)$$

“

This methodology highlights the critical relationship between the state and federal claims: the maximum available Hawaiʻi credit is mathematically capped by the amount of the federal credit [13].

4.2. Determining the Federal TCRA Base Amount (IRC §41)

Because the Hawaiʻi TCRA is an incremental credit, the taxpayer must first determine the federal credit amount ($TCRA_{Federal}$) by completing Federal Form 6765, applying either the Regular Research Credit (RRC) or the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) method [14]. The core challenge here is calculating the federal Base Amount, as required by IRC §41(c). Only the amount of current-year QREs that exceeds this historical base is considered “incremental” and eligible for the federal credit [4, 14].

A key strategic consideration is that the initial step of maximizing the Hawaiʻi credit resides entirely in the meticulous optimization of the Federal Form 6765. The calculation of the federal Base Amount uses global gross receipts [13]. If a firm’s federal QREs do not exceed this base, the resultant federal credit will be zero. Since the Hawaiʻi credit is a fraction of the federal credit, if $TCRA_{Federal}$ is zero, the resulting Hawaiʻi credit will also be zero, irrespective of how substantial the local QREs ($QREs_{HI}$) were. Therefore, successful state claims require a strong, validated federal claim as a foundational element.

4.3. Expense Adjustment (IRC §280C(c)) and Taxable Income Impact

In accordance with the integration of federal law, taxpayers claiming the TCRA must adhere to IRC §280C(c) [9, 10]. This section requires that the taxpayer reduce their deduction or amortization for the research expenses by the amount of the credit claimed, or proportionately reduce the credit itself [4, 10]. Since Hawaiʻi’s income tax rules generally conform to the Internal Revenue Code, this necessary federal expense reduction correspondingly flows through to the state level. This action increases the taxpayer’s Hawaiʻi state taxable income, partially offsetting the benefit of the credit by increasing the underlying state tax base [10].

Table 3: TCRA Calculation Example: Fractional Apportionment Method (Hi-Tech Solutions, LLC)

V. Practical Case Study: Calculating and Claiming the TCRA

5.1. Hypothetical Company Profile and Data Summary

Consider Hi-Tech Solutions, LLC, a technology firm registered in Hawaiʻi that employs 400 individuals, satisfying the Act 139 small business requirement of under 500 employees “. The company’s primary activity is qualified research.

For the tax year 202X, the company compiles the following QRE data:

• Total Global QREs: $1,200,000
• QREs Incurred in Hawaiʻi ($QREs_{HI}$): $480,000
• Federal Base Amount (per IRC §41(c)): $500,000

The company’s federal incremental QREs are $\$700,000$ ( $\$1,200,000 – \$500,000$ ). Applying the federal 20% Regular Research Credit (RRC) rate yields a Federal TCRA of $\$140,000$ [13].

5.2. Step-by-Step Compliance Procedure

1. Federal Filing and Calculation: Hi-Tech Solutions completes Federal Form 6765, establishing the federal credit of $\$140,000$ [13].
2. Apportionment Calculation: The company calculates the required apportionment ratio:
   
   $$\text{Ratio} = \frac{\text{\$480,000 (Hawaiʻi QREs)}}{\text{\$1,200,000 (Total QREs)}} = 40\%$$
   “
3. Hawaiʻi TCRA Determination: The final credit is calculated:
   
   $$TCRA_{HI} = \$140,000 \times 40\% = \$56,000$$
   “
4. DBEDT Certification Rush (March): Knowing the stringent first-come, first-served rule, Hi-Tech Solutions prepares the updated Form N-346A, Questionnaire Part B (1), and the detailed Questionnaire Pt B (2).xls. The company must achieve pre-audit readiness months in advance and submit the application for the $\$56,000$ credit immediately upon the application window opening in March [1, 12].
5. DBEDT Review and Approval: Assuming the claim is accepted under the $5 million annual cap, DBEDT reviews the application and sends the certified Form N-346A (Part II) to Hi-Tech Solutions, typically around June 30th [1, 4].
6. DoTax Filing (By 12-Month Deadline): Hi-Tech Solutions completes Hawaiʻi Form N-346, claiming the certified $\$56,000$ credit. As a flow-through entity, the LLC attaches the required certification documents (N-346A, Form 6765) and prepares Schedule K-1s to allocate the $\$56,000$ credit to its members for inclusion in their individual or corporate returns [4, 7].

VI. Strategic Considerations and Conclusion

6.1. Strategic Compliance: Managing Complexity and Scarcity

The Hawaiʻi TCRA program presents significant administrative hurdles centered on the interaction between strict federal conformity and severe state-level competition.

The structure of the law effectively imposes a requirement for absolute readiness well before standard tax deadlines. The operational constraints imposed by the DBEDT’s instantaneous cap closure necessitate that QHTBs finalize their federal calculation (Form 6765) and meticulously document all Hawaiʻi-only QREs in the detailed Part B documentation months prior to the March application window [1, 12]. Any error resulting from rushing the documentation could lead to rejection by DoTax, even if the application beat the $5 million cap.

For corporate tax directors, the overriding strategic implication is that the primary constraint on the Hawaiʻi credit amount is the quantum of the calculated federal credit. If a multi-state firm conducts 100% of its R&D in Hawaiʻi but fails to generate an incremental federal credit (due to a high historical base), the firm receives zero state benefit. Therefore, documentation tracking must not only isolate the in-state QREs but also ensure meticulous adherence to the federal four-part test to maximize the initial $TCRA_{Federal}$ calculation.

6.2. Economic Context and Program Effectiveness

Despite the administrative complexity and logistical risks, the TCRA remains a valuable incentive. The program has been shown to effectively leverage private spending; state statistics indicate that for a $5 million annual expenditure cap, the state generated over $\$43.3$ million in total research expenses in tax year 2024 “. This leveraging mechanism contributes to job growth, particularly in the non-traded sectors like construction and retail, demonstrating a measurable multiplier effect [3].

However, the severe scarcity caused by the $5 million annual aggregate cap is widely regarded as a critical constraint on the program’s potential. Critics argue that this small scale cannot substantially contribute to significant future economic growth . The first-come, first-served rationing system, which results in the cap being met almost instantly, also rewards submission speed rather than the quality or overall economic value of the research proposed `[3, 6]`. This discourages firms that prioritize thoroughness in their complex federal and state filings. Experts suggest that to expand the pool of beneficiaries and reduce the artificial competition, the state should consider raising the annual credit cap, with recommendations often citing a gradual increase to $\$20$ million over a four-to-five-year period .

6.3. Conclusion

The Hawaiʻi Tax Credit for Research Activities (TCRA) is a crucial, high-demand, and now legislatively extended incentive supporting local technological development. The recent amendment restricting eligibility to small businesses (500 employees or less) strengthens the program’s focus on fostering genuine local growth “.

For any QHTB seeking this credit, success hinges not merely on qualifying expenses, but on a highly coordinated, time-sensitive administrative strategy. Compliance must prioritize two simultaneous goals: (1) instantaneous submission of the certified Form N-346A to DBEDT during the narrow application window to secure funding against the severe $\$5$ million cap, and (2) ensuring the underlying calculation is technically flawless, based rigorously on a legitimate federal IRC §41 claim, to withstand subsequent review by DoTax. Failure at either compliance step results in forfeiture of the state benefit.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/