Federal Amortization of R&D Expenditures (IRC § 174) and Its Nuanced Application in the Idaho Research Activities Tax Credit

I. Executive Summary: Amortization and the Idaho R&D Credit

The amortization of Research and Experimental (R&E) expenditures, mandated by Internal Revenue Code (IRC) $\S 174$, requires businesses to capitalize these costs and deduct them over a five- or fifteen-year period rather than immediately expensing them. For Idaho state tax purposes, this capitalization requirement is critical because Idaho’s statutory conformity date effectively locks in mandatory amortization, significantly impacting state taxable income. While Idaho mandates amortization for state income tax deductions, the core importance of $\S 174$ for the Idaho Research Activities Tax Credit (Idaho Code $\S 63-3029G$) is purely qualitative: it serves as the initial gateway test to determine if the expenses are eligible for the credit calculation.

II. The Federal Framework: IRC Section 174 and SRE Expenditures

The tax treatment of costs associated with generating new products, processes, or technologies is governed by IRC $\S 174$. This section not only controls the timing of tax deductions for R&E costs but also functions as the essential threshold for determining eligibility for the Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credit under IRC $\S 41$.1

A. Historical Context and the TCJA Mandate

Historically, taxpayers could choose to immediately expense R&E expenditures, providing a powerful incentive for innovation by maximizing first-year deductions.3 However, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017 mandated a dramatic shift.

The Mandatory Amortization Period (2022–2024)

For tax years beginning after December 31, 2021, the option for immediate expensing was eliminated.4 Instead, businesses were required to capitalize their Specified Research or Experimental (SRE) expenditures and amortize them over fixed periods.3 Domestic R&E expenditures must be amortized ratably over five years (60 months), while foreign R&E expenditures must be amortized over fifteen years (180 months).6

The scope of SREs covered by $\S 174$ is broader than the definition of Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) used for the $\S 41$ credit, notably encompassing indirect R&D overhead and all software development costs.8 The mandatory capitalization requirement necessitated that many taxpayers file a change of accounting method (e.g., Form 3115) from immediate expensing to capitalization, typically using a cut-off method for new costs paid or incurred after the change went into effect.6

This mandate created an immediate and significant tax cash flow challenge for R&D-intensive companies starting in 2022.9 By deferring the deduction of substantial costs, taxable income instantly increased, forcing companies to reconsider estimated tax payments and potentially reducing capital available for reinvestment in innovation. For instance, a company incurring $5 million in R&D expenses annually would shift from a $5 million deduction to a $1 million deduction in year one, resulting in $4 million of unexpected taxable income.

B. Post-2024 Legislative Shifts: The OBBBA and IRC § 174A

Federal law governing R&E expenditures changed once again with the enactment of the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (OBBBA, P.L. 119-21) in July 2025. This legislation introduced IRC $\S 174A$, which generally restored favorable treatment for domestic R&E.10

IRC $\S 174A$ allows taxpayers the option to fully expense domestic R&E expenditures paid or incurred in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024.7 Foreign R&E costs, however, must still be capitalized and amortized over 15 years.7

Furthermore, the OBBBA included critical transition relief, allowing businesses to address the R&E costs capitalized during the 2022–2024 period. Taxpayers may accelerate the deduction of these unamortized domestic R&E costs into the first tax year beginning after December 31, 2024, or spread the deduction evenly over the 2025 and 2026 tax years.10 This retroactive option, particularly for small businesses (those meeting the Section 448(c) gross receipts test of $31 million or less) 7, necessitates a comprehensive modeling exercise. Taxpayers must evaluate the cash flow benefit of amending prior returns (2022–2024) to secure refunds versus the complexity and administrative burden associated with potentially generating Net Operating Losses (NOLs) and dealing with varying tax rates for pass-through entity owners across different years.10

III. Idaho’s Conformity Stance: Decoupling and State Taxable Income

The complexities introduced by the federal shifts in $\S 174$ treatment are amplified in Idaho due to the state’s approach to federal tax conformity. This divergence creates mandatory state-level tax modifications that persist even after the federal expensing reinstatement.

A. Idaho’s Statutory Conformity Principle (Idaho Code § 63-3004)

Idaho operates under a static conformity model, meaning the state adopts the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) as it existed on a specific date set by the legislature.12

The current crucial date for Idaho tax law is January 1, 2025.12 This date precedes the enactment of the OBBBA (signed into law in July 2025), which introduced the favorable expensing rules of IRC $\S 174A$.15 Because the state’s conformity date does not incorporate the OBBBA amendments, Idaho law explicitly does not follow the federal expensing or transition relief rules implemented in mid-2025.15

B. The Mandatory State Modification for Post-2024 Tax Years

Since Idaho’s static conformity date of January 1, 2025, locks in the pre-OBBBA version of $\S 174$, the TCJA’s mandatory amortization requirement remains the prevailing law for Idaho state income tax calculations.15

Consequently, if a taxpayer elects full expensing of domestic R&E costs federally under $\S 174A$ (for tax years beginning after December 31, 2024), that taxpayer must make a significant modification when calculating their Idaho state taxable income:

1. Add-Back: The full amount of the domestic R&E expense deducted federally under $\S 174A$ must be added back to the state tax base.
2. State Deduction: The taxpayer is only permitted to deduct the portion of the R&E costs determined by the 5-year amortization schedule (or 15 years for foreign R&E) as required by the pre-OBBBA $\S 174$ rules.

This divergence means that for R&D-intensive businesses, Idaho taxable income will often be substantially higher than federal taxable income. Companies must therefore maintain two distinct schedules for R&E costs: one tracking the federal deduction and one tracking the continuing 5-year state amortization schedule to correctly calculate the state tax add-back modification.

The table below summarizes the contrasting federal and Idaho treatment of domestic R&E expenditures, highlighting the significant state tax burden imposed by Idaho’s static conformity stance:

Federal vs. Idaho Treatment of Domestic R&E Expenditures for Taxable Income

IV. The Idaho Research Activities Tax Credit (Idaho Code § 63-3029G)

While the amortization mandate under $\S 174$ significantly delays income tax deductions in Idaho, it does not prevent taxpayers from claiming the Idaho Research Activities Tax Credit, provided the underlying activities satisfy the required federal criteria. The Idaho credit is a nonrefundable credit against state taxes (Idaho Code $\S 63-3024, \S 63-3025, \S 63-3025A$).16

A. Qualification Requirements: The Section 174 Test

Idaho Code $\S 63-3029G$ directly links the state credit’s definitions to the federal R&D tax credit provisions under IRC $\S 41$.1 The central modification is that the research must be conducted in Idaho.16

To be considered “qualified research,” the activities must satisfy the federal four-part test, which includes the Section 174 Test 1:

1. Section 174 Test: The expenditure must be of a type eligible for treatment as R&E under $\S 174$, focusing on the nature of the activity rather than the nature of the final product.1
2. Technological Information Test: The discovery process must fundamentally rely on principles of the physical or biological sciences, engineering, or computer science.1
3. Business Component Test: The research must be intended to develop or improve a business component, such as a product, process, or software.1
4. Process of Experimentation Test: The activity must involve a systematic process designed to eliminate technological uncertainty.1

The Section 174 Test acts solely as a qualitative hurdle. The expenditure’s eligibility for the credit is determined by its conformance to these four principles, regardless of whether the expense is ultimately expensed federally under $\S 174A$ or capitalized and amortized for Idaho state tax purposes.1 This structure ensures that R&D investment remains incentivized through the credit, even when the timing of the income tax deduction is constrained by state conformity rules.

B. Idaho-Specific Calculation Mechanics

The credit calculation is 5% of the excess of Idaho Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) over the base amount, plus 5% of basic research payments conducted in Idaho.2 Idaho imposes several unique modifications to the federal calculation methodology for determining the base amount:

• Idaho-Sourced Gross Receipts: When calculating the base amount, a taxpayer’s gross receipts must include only those receipts attributable to sources within Idaho, using the state’s multistate apportionment rules.2 This often leads to a lower base amount compared to the federal calculation.
• Irrevocable Start-Up Company Election: Idaho allows any taxpayer to elect to be treated as a start-up company, even if they do not meet the strict requirements for federal start-up status.16 Once made, this election is irrevocable.16 This election allows the taxpayer to utilize a fixed-base percentage (FBP) capped at 16% for calculating the base amount, which often serves to minimize the base and maximize the credit.2
• Credit Structure: The Idaho credit follows the federal regular credit calculation method and does not include the alternative simplified credit allowed federally.16 Unused credits are nonrefundable but can be carried forward for up to fourteen taxable years.2 For combined groups of corporations, credits earned by one member may be used by another member of the group.16

V. Idaho State Revenue Office Guidance on IRC § 174 and QREs

The Idaho State Tax Commission (STC) emphasizes strict adherence to the qualitative requirements of the $\S 174$ test to validate R&D credit claims.

A. STC Review of Uncertainty and Experimentation

STC documents focus administrative reviews on the presence of “uncertainty” and “experimentation,” which are key components of the $\S 174$ test.1

Defining Uncertainty: Uncertainty exists if the information available to the taxpayer does not establish the capability or method for developing or improving the product, or the appropriate design.1 This determination is vital; the STC acknowledges that uncertainty may exist even if the taxpayer knows the technical goal is possible but is unsure of the specific method or design required to achieve it.3 The activities undertaken must be directed toward eliminating these specific uncertainties.1

Scrutiny of Expense Classification: The STC requires clear evidence that the expenditures are genuinely experimental, not merely routine business costs (IRC $\S 162$) or costs of goods sold. Agency examinations have noted instances where petitioners improperly reclassified ordinary business expenses (such as certain supplies or wages) as $\S 174$ expenses to maximize credit claims.18 The STC’s focus remains on whether the costs would normally be charged to a capital account or amortized due to their experimental nature.18

B. Record-Keeping Requirements

Compliance with the Idaho R&D credit necessitates rigorous record-keeping. Federal mandates apply directly: IRC $\S 6001$ requires taxpayers to keep sufficient permanent books and records to establish the amount of income, deductions, and credits claimed.3 Specifically for the R&D credit, Treasury Regulation $\S 1.41-4(d)$ requires records to be “sufficiently usable” to substantiate all elements of the four-part test for qualified research.3

VI. Case Study: Illustrating the Income Tax and Credit Calculation Disconnect

This example demonstrates how a company operating in 2026 must adhere to the federal expensing rules for federal income tax purposes (under $\S 174A$) while simultaneously being required to amortize those same costs for Idaho state income tax purposes due to static conformity. It further shows how the credit is calculated independently.

A. Example Setup and Assumptions

B. State Taxable Income Calculation (Amortization Requirement)

Idaho’s conformity date (1/1/2025) predates IRC $\S 174A$. Therefore, Idaho requires the expenses to be amortized over five years, consistent with the mandatory pre-OBBBA rules.

Analysis: The $\$1.2$ million modification forces Alpha Innovations’ state tax base to be significantly higher than its federal tax base, solely because Idaho has decoupled from the federal expensing provision.

C. Idaho R&D Tax Credit Calculation (Qualification and Offset)

The credit calculation proceeds without regard to the amortization schedule for income tax purposes, relying only on the qualifying nature of the activities and Idaho-specific calculations. Alpha Innovations elects the Start-up company treatment.

Idaho R&D Tax Credit Calculation using Idaho-Specific Modifications (Tax Year 2026)

Analysis: Although the amortization mandate increased Alpha’s Idaho taxable income by $\$1.2$ million, the eligibility of the underlying R&E activities for $\S 174$ treatment allows the company to generate a $\$ 25,000$ nonrefundable credit, partially offsetting the state tax liability resulting from the decoupling.

VII. Strategic Implications and Conclusion

The intersection of federal R&D tax policy and Idaho’s static conformity creates a distinct set of compliance and planning challenges for businesses invested in innovation within the state.

A. Navigating the Deduction Timing Divergence

Idaho’s adherence to the IRC as of January 1, 2025, means that businesses must perpetually account for the mandatory capitalization and amortization of R&E expenditures on their state returns, irrespective of federal law changes that permit immediate expensing. This divergence is a persistent source of state tax base inflation. Companies must establish and maintain meticulous record-keeping for two separate deduction methodologies: the federal $\S 174A$ expensing schedule and the 5-year/15-year Idaho amortization schedule. Failure to accurately track and implement the required state modification will result in compliance risk during an STC audit.

B. Maximizing the Idaho Research Activities Tax Credit

The Idaho R&D credit remains a crucial incentive that helps mitigate the higher state tax burden caused by R&E amortization. Taxpayers must ensure that all claimed expenses meet the qualitative Section 174 Test requirements, focusing on documentation of uncertainty elimination and experimentation. Furthermore, utilizing Idaho’s unique statutory exceptions—such as restricting the base calculation to Idaho-sourced gross receipts and leveraging the irrevocable Start-Up Company election—can significantly lower the base amount, thereby maximizing the 5% credit on incremental QREs.2

C. Conclusion

IRC $\S 174$ serves a complex, bifurcated role in Idaho state taxation. For the purposes of calculating state taxable income, Idaho’s static conformity forces taxpayers to continue capitalizing R&E costs, creating an administrative and financial burden that decouples the state tax base from the favorable federal $\S 174A$ rules. Conversely, for the Idaho Research Activities Tax Credit, $\S 174$ acts as a necessary, but distinct, qualitative gatekeeper. Companies operating in Idaho must strategically manage this complex federal/state relationship by diligently tracking dual amortization schedules for deduction purposes while aggressively pursuing the available state credit to offset the resulting increase in state tax liability.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/