The Technical Application of Basic Research in the Idaho R&D Tax Credit

Section 1: Executive Summary and Defining Basic Research in the R&D Context

1.1 Defining Basic Research: A Statutory Overview

Basic Research, in the context of the Idaho R&D tax credit, refers to any original investigation for the advancement of fundamental scientific knowledge not having a specific commercial objective. It is the complex calculation of these incremental expenditures—termed Basic Research Payments (BRP)—that earns a separate 5% state tax credit in Idaho, provided the activity is physically conducted within the state.

The Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41 establishes two primary categories of qualified research activity: Qualified Research (QR), focused on commercial outcomes, and Basic Research (BR), focused on fundamental scientific discovery.1 Idaho’s state law, governing the Credit for Idaho Research Activities (Idaho Code §63-3029G), explicitly conforms to these federal definitions, requiring a nuanced understanding of both the federal framework and Idaho’s specific sourcing rules.3

1.2 The Nuanced Distinction: Basic Research vs. Qualified Research

Accurate utilization of the Idaho R&D credit requires a clear segregation of expenditures between Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) and Basic Research Payments (BRP).

Qualified Research activities must satisfy the four-part test, which includes eligibility under IRC Section 174, a goal of eliminating technological uncertainty, a technological nature rooted in physical or biological sciences, engineering, or computer science, and the inclusion of a process of experimentation.1 QREs typically include wages paid for qualified services, amounts paid for supplies used in research, and 65% of contract research expenses.1 This research is inherently linked to developing or improving a specific business component.1

Basic Research (BR), as defined in IRC §41(e), represents original investigation aimed solely at expanding fundamental scientific knowledge without regard to specific commercial application.2 While BR must satisfy the initial Section 174 eligibility requirement, its ultimate purpose differentiates it from QR. BR is typically performed by a qualified organization, such as a university or tax-exempt scientific institution.2 Because the purpose of BR is the expansion of general knowledge rather than a targeted business component solution, the compliance verification and accounting mechanisms for BRP are distinct from those for QREs.

1.3 The Strategic Value of Basic Research Payments (BRP)

The statutory creation of BRP incentives reflects a policy choice to encourage corporate funding of fundamental, often long-term, scientific endeavors executed by non-profit entities. The federal law, replicated by Idaho, treats BRP as a separate expenditure category, which, if it exceeds a predetermined historical baseline, qualifies for a distinct credit.2

The Idaho framework provides a 5% credit on this incremental Basic Research Payment amount.3 This structure allows taxpayers that fund university research consistently to potentially maximize their total R&D benefit, generating a credit through a separate calculation that is not entirely dependent on overcoming the standard QRE base amount hurdle.

Table 1: Key Distinctions Between Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) and Basic Research Payments (BRP)

Section 2: The Idaho Credit for Research Activities – Federal Conformity and Sourcing Rules

2.1 Idaho’s Statutory Basis: Idaho Code §63-3029G

The Idaho R&D Tax Credit, codified under Idaho Code §63-3029G, serves as a state-level mechanism to incentivize research investments physically located within Idaho. The credit is nonrefundable, meaning it can only offset state income tax liability, but it offers a valuable 14-year carryforward provision for unused amounts, ensuring long-term utility for businesses with fluctuating tax profiles.7 This credit is claimed using Idaho Form 67, the Credit for Idaho Research Activities.8

2.2 Complete Conformity to IRC §41 Definitions

Idaho State Tax Commission (ISTC) guidance confirms that the state credit is calculated using the definitions set forth in IRC Section 41. IDAPA Rule 35.01.01.720 explicitly mandates conformity, stating that the Idaho credit employs the same definitions for qualified research expenses, qualified research, basic research payments, and basic research as the federal code.3

This blanket conformity implies that all federal regulatory requirements and guidance for qualifying expenditures apply equally in Idaho. If an expenditure, including a BRP, fails to meet the federal qualification standards under IRC §41—for instance, if the research fails the technological uncertainty test, or if the payment lacks a written agreement—it is ineligible for the Idaho credit.4

2.3 Idaho’s Unique Sourcing Mandate: The “Conducted in Idaho” Rule

The primary point of divergence between the Idaho research credit and the federal credit is the strict geographic sourcing requirement. Idaho law requires that only amounts related to research conducted in Idaho qualify for the state credit.3

This sourcing mandate applies stringently to BRP. For a payment to qualify, the cash payment must be made to a qualified organization for basic research that is performed by that organization within Idaho.2

This requirement carries significant implications for compliance, particularly for multi-state corporations. Given that BRP is typically remitted to major institutions of higher education, which often conduct research across various locations, the taxpayer must secure precise documentation that confirms the physical location of the actual scientific work—such as lab testing, experimentation, and analysis—occurred exclusively on Idaho soil. Merely paying an Idaho-based organization is insufficient; the written agreement required under IRC §41 must be detailed enough to verify that the research performance itself satisfies Idaho’s sourcing rule.2

Section 3: Qualification Requirements for Basic Research Payments (BRP)

3.1 Definition of a Basic Research Payment (BRP)

The federal definition of BRP, adopted by Idaho, establishes stringent requirements for the payment structure and documentation 2:

1. Cash Requirement: The amount must be paid in cash during the taxable year. Transfers of property, equipment, or other non-cash assets are excluded from the definition of BRP.
2. Written Agreement: The payment must be documented pursuant to a formal, written agreement between the paying corporation and the qualified organization.2 This contract must confirm that the basic research is to be executed by the qualified organization itself.2
3. Qualified Organization: The recipient must be an eligible organization, primarily an educational institution (institution of higher learning) or a qualified scientific tax-exempt organization.2 Idaho law specifically references contributions to Idaho institutions of higher learning, including university-related research parks.10

3.2 Defining a “Qualified Organization” and Payer Eligibility

While Idaho allows various entity types (C-Corporations, S-Corporations, Partnerships, and LLCs) to claim the overall research credit via pass-through allocation 7, the Basic Research Payment definition imposes a specific constraint on the paying entity.

IRC §41 explicitly defines BRP as an amount paid by a corporation.2 The code then excludes certain corporate forms from being eligible payers, namely S corporations, personal holding companies (PHCs), and service organizations.1

This strict adherence to the federal paying entity definition is a critical point for pass-through entities operating in Idaho. A partnership or S-corporation cannot directly incur a qualifying Basic Research Payment. However, Idaho’s unitary group provisions provide a mechanism for credit utilization: A C-Corporation that successfully makes qualifying BRP can earn the credit and, if it is a member of an Idaho unitary group, can elect to share the unused portion of that credit with other members of the unitary group, including related pass-through entities.7 This structure ensures that only federally qualified C-Corporations can generate the BRP credit, while allowing the resulting tax benefit to be distributed across the affiliated enterprise.

Section 4: The Idaho Basic Research Credit Calculation Methodology

4.1 Idaho’s Basic Research Credit Rate

The total Idaho Research Credit is a combination of two 5% components 3:

1. 5% of the excess QREs (Idaho-sourced) over the calculated base amount.
2. 5% of the basic research payments (Idaho-sourced) that exceed the Qualified Organization Base Period Amount (QOBPA).3

It is important to note that Idaho taxpayers are required to use the regular credit calculation method, as the federal Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) is not an available alternative calculation method under Idaho law.3

4.2 The Dual Role of Basic Research Payments (BRP)

The calculation mechanism for BRP ensures that historical spending levels are maintained before new funding receives the incremental credit.2

Portion 1: BRP up to the QOBPA. The BRP amount that does not exceed the QOBPA is statutorily treated as a Contract Research Expense for the purpose of calculating the incremental QRE credit.2 Although contract research is included in QREs at only 65% of the total amount paid, this strategic classification allows the baseline BRP spending to contribute toward surpassing the standard QRE base amount, thereby boosting the IRC §41(a)(1) credit component.2

Portion 2: BRP exceeding the QOBPA. Only the portion of the BRP that exceeds the QOBPA is included in the separate BRP credit calculation.2 This excess amount is the basis for the direct 5% credit under Idaho law.3

4.3 The Calculation Formula: BRP Excess

The amount of BRP generating the direct 5% credit is determined by the following formula:

$$\text{Incremental BRP} = \text{Current Year Idaho Basic Research Payments} – \text{Qualified Organization Base Period Amount (QOBPA)}$$

This structure emphasizes the need for corporate funding strategies to maximize the incremental component. Taxpayers must proactively ensure BRP funding levels clear the calculated QOBPA baseline, as only this excess yields the most direct and highest-value credit component. The payments below the QOBPA, while valuable for increasing QREs (at 65% inclusion), offer a lower return on investment than the incremental BRP portion.

Section 5: Deconstructing the Qualified Organization Base Period Amount (QOBPA)

The QOBPA is a historical calculation designed to establish the threshold for basic research funding. Idaho requires that this calculation strictly adhere to Idaho-sourced data.3

5.1 The Structure of the QOBPA

The QOBPA represents the baseline corporate funding level that must be maintained and surpassed to trigger the direct incremental BRP credit.1 It is composed of two statutory elements: the Minimum Basic Research Amount (MBRA) and the Maintenance-of-Effort (MOE) amount.1

$$\text{QOBPA} = \text{Minimum Basic Research Amount (MBRA)} + \text{Maintenance-of-Effort Amount (MOE)}$$

5.2 Component 1: The Minimum Basic Research Amount (MBRA)

The MBRA is a crucial floor calculation, generally based on the three taxable years immediately preceding the credit year (the base period). The MBRA is the greater of two amounts 2:

1. 1% of the Average Base Period QREs: This involves calculating 1% of the average of Idaho in-house research expenses and Idaho contract research expenses paid or incurred during the base period.2
2. Prior BRP treated as QREs: The average amounts that were previously treated as contract research expenses during the base period due to prior BRP provisions.2

For corporations without a full base period history, special provisions apply, setting a floor MBRA amount at not less than 50% of the current year’s basic research payments.1

5.3 Component 2: The Maintenance-of-Effort (MOE) Amount

The MOE amount is designed to measure and enforce a continued level of non-research educational support provided by the corporation to qualified organizations, specifically institutions of higher education.1

The MOE calculation requires tracking and averaging corporate grants and contributions (unrelated to basic research) paid to eligible institutions during the base period, adjusted for inflation factors mandated by federal rules. Institutions targeted for this measurement include Idaho institutions of higher learning, as recognized under Idaho Code §63-3029A.10

A significant compliance consideration involves the overlap with the Idaho Charitable Contributions Credit. Idaho Code §63-3029A allows a separate 50% credit for charitable contributions to state institutions of higher learning.10 When a taxpayer claims this charitable credit, the underlying non-research grant amount simultaneously contributes to the MOE calculation for the R&D credit. By increasing the MOE, the overall QOBPA baseline is raised, making it more challenging for the taxpayer to surpass the threshold necessary to claim the incremental 5% BRP credit. Taxpayers must therefore integrate the analysis of both the charitable contribution credit and the R&D credit to ensure maximum benefit realization.

5.4 Treatment of Base Amount Calculations in Idaho

Idaho adheres strictly to the IRC §41 structure for calculating the QOBPA.3 For multi-state corporations, the sourcing rule requires the calculation of MBRA and MOE to use only Idaho-sourced QREs and Idaho-attributable grants.3 This requires multi-state taxpayers to maintain robust, segregated historical records detailing all relevant expenditures and grants specifically within Idaho for the rolling base period years. Furthermore, if a taxpayer’s federal credit calculation involved short taxable year adjustments, Idaho mandates the use of those same adjusted calculations for the state credit.4

Section 6: Idaho State Tax Commission Guidance and Administrative Requirements

6.1 Regulatory Compliance: IDAPA Rule 35.01.01.720

The Idaho Administrative Code Rule 35.01.01.720 details the ISTC’s position on the research credit. The rule confirms the comprehensive conformity to IRC §41 and the exclusion of any expense that fails the federal qualification test.4

The rule also establishes the necessary sequencing for credit application (credit priority), noting that the credit for Idaho research activities is nonrefundable and is applied after other statutory credits.4 Specific credits that must be applied prior to the R&D credit include: the credit for tax paid to other states, the credit for contributions to Idaho educational entities (Idaho Code §63-3029A), and the Investment Tax Credit (ITC).11 This priority sequence is crucial for financial planning, as it determines the likelihood of utilizing the BRP credit in the current year.

6.2 Reporting Mechanics: Idaho Form 67 (Credit for Idaho Research Activities)

The Idaho research credit, including the BRP component, is reported on Idaho Form 67.9 C-Corporations must include a complete copy of their federal Form 1120 with their Idaho return.16

Form 67 requires the taxpayer to detail the calculated components of the credit, including the QOBPA, the incremental BRP, and the resulting 5% credit amount.3 The accuracy of the credit hinges on the ability of the taxpayer to support the calculated QOBPA through robust historical documentation of Idaho-sourced expenditures. Unused credits are carried over to future years, limited to a 14-year carryforward period.7

6.3 Unitary Group and Gross Receipts Considerations

For multi-state entities, specific rules ensure accurate attribution of research activity to Idaho:

• Idaho Gross Receipts: For calculating the QRE base amount (which indirectly involves the QOBPA portion treated as QRE), multi-state corporations must use only gross receipts attributable to sources within Idaho, following the apportionment rules outlined in Idaho Code §63-3027(q) and (r).3
• Unitary Group Sharing: While only C-Corporations can generate the BRP credit, the resulting credit may be shared. A corporate member of a unitary group must first claim the credit against its own Idaho income tax liability. Any remaining unused credit can then be elected to be shared with other members of the unitary group.3

Section 7: Case Study and Detailed Example of BRP Calculation

The following example illustrates the calculation of the Idaho Basic Research Credit for a hypothetical Idaho C-Corporation, TechCorp, in the 2024 tax year. The focus is on determining the QOBPA and the resultant incremental credit.

7.1 Hypothetical Scenario: TechCorp’s Idaho Basic Research Payments

TechCorp, an Idaho C-Corporation, funds basic physics research at the University of Idaho. The research is conducted exclusively in Idaho and is subject to a written agreement.

7.2 Calculation of the Qualified Organization Base Period Amount (QOBPA)

Step 1: Calculate the Average Base Period QREs.

The average of the total Idaho QREs for 2020-2022 is calculated:

$$(\$3,000,000 + \$4,000,000 + \$5,000,000) / 3 = \$4,000,000$$

Step 2: Calculate the Minimum Basic Research Amount (MBRA).

The MBRA is determined as the greater of 1% of the Average Base Period QREs or the average prior BRP treated as QREs.2 Assuming prior BRP treatment was zero for simplicity:

$$1\% \times \$4,000,000 = \$40,000$$

$$\text{MBRA} = \$40,000$$

Step 3: Calculate the Maintenance-of-Effort (MOE) Amount.

Based on the complexity of IRC §41(e)(5) and assuming an estimated MOE threshold:

$$\text{MOE} = \$150,000$$

Step 4: Calculate the Qualified Organization Base Period Amount (QOBPA).

The QOBPA is the sum of the MBRA and the MOE 1:

$$\text{QOBPA} = \text{MBRA} + \text{MOE} = \$40,000 + \$150,000 = \textbf{\$190,000}$$

7.3 Calculation of the Idaho Basic Research Credit (2024)

Step 5: Determine the Incremental BRP.

The Incremental BRP is the current year BRP exceeding the QOBPA 2:

$$\text{Incremental BRP} = \$900,000 – \$190,000 = \textbf{\$710,000}$$

Step 6: Calculate the Idaho Basic Research Credit.

The credit is 5% of the Incremental BRP 3:

$$\text{Credit} = \$710,000 \times 0.05 = \textbf{\$35,500}$$

Step 7: Determine the Treatment of the QOBPA Portion.

The $190,000 of BRP equal to the QOBPA is excluded from the direct credit calculation but is reclassified as a Contract Research Expense for the incremental QRE calculation.2 This amount is included in TechCorp’s total QREs at 65%:

$$\text{QOBPA contribution to QRE} = \$190,000 \times 0.65 = \$123,500$$

This contribution ensures that the baseline funding supports the generation of the standard incremental R&D credit.

Table 4: Summary of TechCorp’s 2024 Idaho Basic Research Credit

Section 8: Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

The Idaho Credit for Research Activities offers a significant incentive for corporations funding basic scientific research, but it demands strict adherence to complex federal calculation methodologies and state-specific sourcing mandates. Compliance and maximization strategies must address the dual nature of Basic Research Payments (BRP) and the high documentation requirements imposed by the Qualified Organization Base Period Amount (QOBPA).

1. Verification of Research Sourcing and Documentation: The most critical state-level compliance point is the “conducted in Idaho” rule.4 Taxpayers must ensure all written agreements supporting BRP explicitly confirm that the research activities will be performed within Idaho to validate the claim during an ISTC review.
2. Entity and Payment Compliance: Only C-Corporations are eligible to generate BRP.1 While resulting credits may flow through to affiliated entities within a unitary group, the initial payment must be cash-based and originate from a qualifying corporate structure.2
3. Strategic Management of the QOBPA Baseline: The taxpayer’s R&D funding strategy should be modeled to efficiently manage the QOBPA. Expenditures below the QOBPA are valuable because they convert into QREs (at 65% inclusion), aiding in overcoming the standard QRE base amount.2 However, to earn the higher return from the direct BRP credit, spending must strategically exceed this QOBPA baseline.
4. Navigating Credit Stacking Conflicts: Financial planning must account for Idaho’s credit priority rules. Specifically, the interplay between the Basic Research MOE calculation (a component of the QOBPA) and the separate 50% charitable contributions credit (Idaho Code §63-3029A) is critical. Significant charitable grants to Idaho educational entities can increase the MOE, raising the QOBPA hurdle for the R&D credit. Taxpayers must balance the benefits derived from the charitable contribution credit against the potential increase in the R&D base amount. Furthermore, the final BRP credit is nonrefundable and must be utilized against the remaining tax liability after priority credits have been applied.4 This necessitates thorough planning to ensure sufficient Idaho income tax liability exists for full utilization of the generated credit, or proper management of the 14-year carryforward.7

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/