Strategic Guide to Idaho Form 67: Maximizing the Credit for Research Activities (R&D Tax Credit)

Idaho Form 67 is the required tax schedule utilized by businesses to calculate the Credit for Research Activities under Idaho Code §63-3029G. This nonrefundable state tax credit offers a five percent (5%) incentive on qualified research expenditures incurred in Idaho that exceed a computed historical base amount.

1. Executive Summary: The Core Purpose of Idaho Form 67

Idaho Form 67 serves as the official mechanism for taxpayers to compute and claim the nonrefundable Credit for Research Activities, which is designed to stimulate in-state innovation and economic investment.1 This incentive allows for a five percent (5%) credit against applicable state income taxes for increasing qualified research activities conducted exclusively within Idaho.3

1.2. Deeper Analysis: Alignment and Divergence from Federal Law

The fundamental structure of the Idaho Research Credit framework, codified in Idaho Code §63-3029G, relies heavily on the definitions established in the federal Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41.3 This conformity ensures definitional consistency, allowing businesses already documenting their activities for federal purposes to streamline their state compliance.

Key Conformity Points

The terms “qualified research expenses” (QREs), “qualified research,” “basic research payments,” and the methodology for calculating the “base amount” are defined by reference to IRC §41.3 To qualify, the research must satisfy the four-part test: the Section 174 Test (expenditures treated as expenses under IRC §174), the Technological Information Test, the Business Component Test, and the Process of Experimentation Test.4

Critical Idaho-Specific Divergences and Stipulations

While leveraging federal definitions, Idaho mandates several key adjustments that significantly localize the credit:

1. In-State Exclusivity: A core requirement of the Idaho credit is that all QREs and basic research payments must be attributable solely to research activities conducted exclusively in Idaho.3 This geographical constraint ensures that the tax benefit directly subsidizes R&D infrastructure and employment within the state.
2. Gross Receipts Sourcing: When determining the historical fixed-base percentage (FBP), the calculation uses “Idaho gross receipts,” defined explicitly by the state’s multistate corporation apportionment rules, rather than nationwide receipts.3
3. Alternative Credit Exclusions: Taxpayers must utilize the regular IRC §41 calculation methodology. Idaho statute prohibits the use of the Alternative Incremental Credit (AIC) (IRC §41(c)(4)) or the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) (IRC §41(c)(5)) methods.3
4. Start-up Election Independence: A taxpayer can elect to be treated as a start-up company for Idaho research credit purposes, even if it does not meet the federal start-up criteria. Once made, however, this election is irrevocable.3

The stringent requirement that research expenses be “conducted exclusively in Idaho” establishes a clear strategic direction for the state’s economic policy. By mandating hyper-local sourcing of research expenses, the state guarantees that its tax expenditure effectively maximizes direct benefits to the Idaho economy, ensuring that the incentive is tightly focused on rewarding investment within its borders.

2. Statutory and Regulatory Framework of the Idaho R&D Credit

2.1. Legislative Basis: Idaho Code §63-3029G

The legal authority for the credit is found in Idaho Code §63-3029G, titled “CREDITS FOR RESEARCH ACTIVITIES CONDUCTED IN THIS STATE — CARRYFORWARD”.2 This statute permits a nonrefundable credit against taxes imposed by sections 63-3024 (Individual Income Tax), 63-3025 (Corporate Income Tax), and 63-3025A (Trust/Estate Tax).3

It is important to differentiate the statutory R&D tax credit (Title 63) from the Tax Reimbursement Incentive (TRI) program (Title 67, Chapter 47). The TRI is a distinct, negotiated incentive designed for “meaningful projects”—expansions or creations of businesses that meet minimum required new job commitments and community match criteria.8 Form 67 relates only to the formulaic research credit based on incremental R&D spending, independent of specific job creation commitments associated with the TRI program.8

2.2. Calculation Methodology and Credit Rate

The Idaho credit is structured to incentivize increased research spending by providing a credit based on the excess of current-year QREs over a historic base amount.1 The total credit allowed is the sum of two distinct components, each calculated at a five percent (5%) rate 3:

1. Incremental QRE Component: Five percent (5%) of the excess of qualified research expenses for research conducted in Idaho over the calculated base amount.
2. Basic Research Component: Five percent (5%) of basic research payments that are allowable under IRC §41(e), provided the basic research is conducted in Idaho. This component typically applies primarily to qualifying corporations.3

2.3. Defining Qualified Research (STC Guidance)

To be eligible for the credit, the activities must satisfy the rigorous standards of “qualified research” defined by IRC §41 and confirmed by the Idaho State Tax Commission (STC).4 The research must be technological in nature, seeking to develop a new or improved business component, and involve a process of experimentation.4

The STC guidance clarifies specific exclusions that must be observed: qualified research involves only technological activities and does not include research in economics, business management, behavioral sciences, arts, or humanities.4 Furthermore, QREs include in-house research expenses, such as wages for employees engaged in qualified activities and the cost of supplies, as well as 65% of contract research expenses paid to third parties, provided these activities are performed in Idaho.5

3. Compliance: Idaho Gross Receipts and Apportionment

A critical element in calculating the Idaho Research Credit is determining the Base Amount, which requires identifying the taxpayer’s historic “Idaho Gross Receipts.” This calculation is complex and mandates the use of specific sourcing rules.

3.1. STC Guidance on “Idaho Gross Receipts”

The instructions for Form 67 explicitly mandate that gross receipt calculations must include only those gross receipts attributable to Idaho using the multistate corporation apportionment rules, as outlined in Idaho Code §63-3027(12) and (13).4 This ensures that the base used for comparison (the FBP denominator) reflects the taxpayer’s actual economic activity within the state.

The STC defines these receipts using specific sourcing principles:

• Receipts Definition: Gross receipts include receipts from the sale of real, tangible, or intangible property held for sale to customers, net of returns and allowances.4
• Sourcing Rules: Receipts are considered attributable to Idaho if the property is delivered or shipped to a purchaser in Idaho (destination sourcing). Furthermore, sales to the U.S. government are Idaho gross receipts if the property is shipped from a facility located within Idaho.4
• Annualization and New Business: If one or more of the preceding four tax years used for the average calculation is a short tax year, the Idaho gross receipts for that short year must be annualized. Conversely, a new taxpayer who has not transacted business in Idaho prior to the credit year is deemed to have average annual gross receipts for the four preceding years equal to zero, which significantly lowers their base amount in the initial years.10

The requirement to use multistate apportionment rules for calculating historical gross receipts introduces a dependency between corporate income tax compliance and R&D credit compliance. The accuracy of the credit hinges directly on the precision of the firm’s Idaho sales factor calculation. For large enterprises, particularly those operating as unitary groups, any future adjustment during an audit to the underlying Idaho sales factor could retroactively alter the R&D credit base amount for the four subsequent years. This interconnection necessitates highly coordinated data management between the apportionment team and the R&D tax credit specialists to mitigate future compliance risks.

4. Complexities of the Base Amount Calculation (Form 67, Parts A and B)

The base amount serves as the threshold for current-year QREs. Only QREs that exceed this amount generate the credit. The base amount is calculated by multiplying the Fixed-Base Percentage (FBP) by the average annual Idaho gross receipts for the four preceding tax years.10

4.1. Fixed-Base Percentage (FBP) Determination

The FBP is determined by the ratio of aggregate Idaho QREs to aggregate Idaho Gross Receipts over a specific transition period outlined in the statute. This percentage is subject to a statutory maximum cap of 16%.1 When calculating the FBP, the percentage must be rounded to four digits to the right of the decimal point (e.g., 0.06666 rounds to 6.67%).4

4.2. FBP Transition Rules for Established Businesses

For taxpayers who have been incurring Idaho QREs since 1993, the calculation of the FBP involves a statutory transition period that phases the calculation toward the 100% fixed-base ratio typically used under federal law. Form 67 provides a table to determine the required look-back window and the corresponding percentage multiplier used to calculate the FBP.10

Table: Idaho Fixed-Base Percentage (FBP) Transition Schedule (Form 67, Part B)

4.3. The Irrevocable Start-up Company Election

Idaho provides a unique benefit by allowing a taxpayer to elect start-up company status for Form 67 purposes, even if that taxpayer does not qualify as a start-up for the federal credit.3 This election, made by checking the applicable box on Form 67, provides a significant advantage during the early years of operation.4

• Benefit: A company electing start-up status uses a simplified FBP of 3% for the first five tax years that it incurs Idaho QREs.1 This fixed, low percentage results in a significantly reduced base amount compared to a potentially higher computed FBP, thereby generating a larger incremental credit during the company’s formative years.
• Mandatory Constraint: The crucial constraint on this beneficial option is that the election to be treated as a start-up company for Idaho purposes is irrevocable.1

The permanent nature of the start-up election requires sophisticated financial modeling and forecasting. While the immediate use of a low 3% FBP is highly favorable, the taxpayer must consider the long-term consequences. The QREs and gross receipts reported during those favorable start-up years will eventually be incorporated into the FBP calculation when the company transitions into the 6th year and beyond. If the company’s QREs grow much faster than its Idaho gross receipts during those first five years, the mandated future FBP calculation could be artificially inflated by the high QRE-to-receipt ratio established early on. Consequently, this critical strategic decision necessitates careful analysis by senior tax and finance professionals before the election is made.

5. Idaho-Specific Utilization Rules and Limitations

5.1. Credit Mechanics and Carryforward Provisions

The Idaho Credit for Research Activities is a nonrefundable credit.1 This characteristic dictates that the credit may only reduce Idaho income tax liability and cannot result in a tax refund if the credit amount exceeds the tax due.12

A substantial feature of the Idaho credit is the long carryforward period. Any unused credits that cannot be applied in the current tax year due to the nonrefundable nature or credit stacking limitations may be carried forward for up to 14 tax years.1 This long duration is vital for R&D-intensive businesses, which often incur significant QREs and accumulate credits before achieving substantial taxable income.

5.2. Nonrefundable Credit Ordering Priority (IDAPA 35.01.01.799)

Idaho law imposes a strict statutory order, or “stacking,” in which nonrefundable credits must be applied against the tax liability.12 This ordering priority directly impacts the annual utility of the R&D credit.

The Idaho research credit (authorized by Section 63-3029G) is applied relatively late, holding the eighth position in the statutory hierarchy, following several major business and personal credits.12

Table: Priority Order of Nonrefundable Idaho Tax Credits (Selected)

The placement of the R&D credit at position 8 is a critical tax planning consideration. If a taxpayer has large amounts of higher-priority credits, such as the Investment Tax Credit (ITC), those credits will first consume the available Idaho tax liability.13 This reduction in available liability means the R&D credit often goes unused in the current year, necessitating the reliance on the carryforward provision. Consequently, the generous 14-year carryforward is essential for ensuring the economic value of the R&D credit is realized over time, mitigating the negative impact of its low utilization priority.

6. Special Rules for Corporate Structures and Flow-Through Entities

6.1. Unitary Group Sharing and Limitations

For corporations included in a unitary group and filing a combined report under Idaho Code §63-3027(22), the sharing of the R&D credit is permitted, subject to specific rules.2

The corporation that generated (earned) the credit must first apply the credit against its own Idaho income tax liability up to the allowable limitation.1 Only the portion of the credit that remains unused by the earning member may then be shared with and used by another member of the unitary group.2 Corporations claiming and sharing the credit are required to provide the STC with a calculation schedule that clearly identifies the credit earned, the amount used by the originating member, the shared credit, and the computation of any remaining carryovers.13

6.2. Allocation for Pass-Through Entities

If the taxpayer is an S corporation, partnership, trust, or estate—collectively referred to as pass-through entities—the credit calculation is performed at the entity level.5 The resulting credit is then passed through to the shareholders, partners, or beneficiaries in proportion to their ownership interests.4 Owners receive documentation of the allocated credit amount on Form ID K-1, specifically reported on Part VII, line 45 (or equivalent sections for certain composite filers).4 The credit is then claimed on the owner’s individual or corporate tax return, where it remains subject to the limitations of the nonrefundable status and the state’s credit stacking rules.

7. Practical Application: Detailed Form 67 Calculation Example

To illustrate the mechanics of Form 67, particularly the use of the FBP Transition Schedule, consider R&D TechCorp, an established Idaho-based manufacturer in its 8th tax year of incurring Idaho QREs.

7.1. Hypothetical Scenario Setup: R&D TechCorp, Inc. (8th Tax Year)

Historical Data for FBP Calculation (CY-3 to CY-1)

Historical Data for Average Gross Receipts (Preceding 4 Years)

7.2. Step 1: Calculating Average Annual Idaho Gross Receipts (Form 67, Line 10)

The aggregate Idaho Gross Receipts for the four preceding years are $\$85,000,000$.

The average annual Idaho Gross Receipts (Line 10) are calculated as:

$$\frac{\text{\$85,000,000}}{\text{4 years}} = \text{\$21,250,000}$$

7.3. Step 2: Determining the Base Amount (Form 67, Lines 9 and 11)

1. Fixed-Base Percentage (FBP) Calculation: The ratio of aggregate QREs to aggregate Gross Receipts for the specified three-year window is:
   
   $$\frac{\text{\$3,500,000}}{\text{\$67,000,000}} \approx 0.052238$$
2. Rounded FBP (Line 9): Rounding to four decimal places results in $5.2238\%$.
3. FBP Multiplier (Line 4): Since this is the 8th tax year of QREs, the statutory multiplier is $50\%$ ($0.50$).11
4. Final Fixed-Base Percentage (Line 9): $0.052238 \times 0.50 \approx 0.026119$ (or $2.61\%$).
5. Base Amount (Line 11): The Base Amount is the Average Annual Gross Receipts multiplied by the Final FBP:
   
   $$\$21,250,000 \times 0.026119 = \text{\$555,028.75}$$

7.4. Step 3: Calculating the Current Year Credit

1. Current Year Idaho QREs: $\$1,200,000$.
2. Base Amount: $\$555,028.75$.
3. Excess Incremental QREs (Line 12): $\$1,200,000 – \$555,028.75 = \text{\$644,971.25}$.
4. Current Year Incremental R&D Credit (Line 14): $\$644,971.25 \times 5\% = \text{\$32,248.56}$.

7.5. Step 4: Credit Application and Carryforward Analysis

1. Total Available Credit (Line 23): $\$32,248.56$ (Current Credit) $+ \$50,000$ (Prior Carryover) $=\text{\$82,248.56}$.
2. Net Idaho Tax Liability (after higher-priority credits): $\$100,000$.
3. Credit Used: Since the available credit $(\$82,248.56)$ is less than the liability $(\$100,000)$, the full available credit is applied.
4. Credit Carryover to Next Year: $\$0$.

8. Conclusion: Maximizing Idaho R&D Investment Value

Idaho Form 67 and the associated Credit for Research Activities represent a substantial, strategically focused state tax incentive aimed at increasing in-state technological development. The credit’s structure provides predictability by conforming to federal IRC §41 definitions while ensuring direct local economic impact through strict state-specific limitations.

Successful navigation of the Idaho R&D credit necessitates expert compliance in three key areas:

1. Exacting Sourcing Documentation: Businesses must maintain robust documentation to demonstrate that all claimed QREs were performed exclusively within Idaho borders. Any deviation from this stringent requirement risks the disallowance of the entire expense.
2. Strategic Base Calculation: The reliance on Idaho-apportioned gross receipts for the base amount calculation mandates close coordination between R&D specialists and the corporate apportionment team. Ensuring the accuracy and consistency of the Idaho sales factor over the four preceding years is essential to avoid future audit exposure that could retroactively impact the base amount.
3. Long-Term Election Modeling: The election to be treated as an Idaho start-up company provides significant benefits in the first five years (using a 3% FBP) but carries an irrevocable penalty. A thorough analysis of projected QRE growth versus projected Idaho gross receipts must be completed to ensure the election does not result in a disproportionately high mandatory FBP after the start-up period concludes.

Due to the credit’s low priority in the state’s stacking order, the resulting R&D credits frequently transition into the 14-year carryforward period.1 Therefore, establishing meticulous systems for tracking and optimizing the utilization of these deferred credits is paramount to fully realizing the long-term economic benefit Idaho provides for investment in research and development.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/